Concerned Officers Movement

File:COM First Leaflet 14Mar1970.jpgCOMs genesis sprang from the participation of Marine Captain Bob Brugger in the November 1969 March on Washington against the Vietnam War. The Washington Post carried an article about Brugger and his wife that caused his superior officers to enter an unsatisfactory mark for loyalty in his fitness report and generated supportive phone calls from other officers.{{cite news|last=MacPherson|first=Myra|date=1969-11-15|title=Marine Captain: Mobilization Marshal|newspaper=The Washington Post }}{{cite news|last=Holmberg|first=David|date=1970-06-01|title=Officers Form Unit as Outlet for Dissent|work=The Evening Star}} Brugger's opposition to "blind patriotism" and his stand against racism at home and in Vietnam had struck a chord with other officers who read the article.

Over several months a group of officers agreed to work together and on March 14, 1970, they participated as Officers' Resistance in a G.I. Rally for Peace and Justice in Washington, D.C. By the end of March 1970 they had changed their name to the Concerned Officers Movement. Early members who signed the first published newsletter were LT Jim Crawford, USN; CPT Ed Fox, USA; CPT Gerry Giovaniello, USAR; LTJG Tono Hixon, USNR; LTJG Phil Lehman, USNR; LTJG Randy Thomas, USNR; CPT Larry Wasser, USA (MC); and CPT Bob Gaines, USAR. Other early members were 1LT Louis Font, a West Point honor graduate, who received extensive national media coverage for his stand against the war and CAPT Mike Mullen, USMCR who was one of the contacts on the organization's first leaflet (see image to right).{{cite news|last=Charlton|first=Linda|date=1970-03-17|title=West Point Graduate Seeking Discharge Over Vietnam Issue|work=The New York Times}}

COM's first newsletter, published in April 1970, described the organization's political views:

{{blockquote|The Concerned Officers' Movement was formed by a group of active duty and reserve officers who could no longer continue to be passive, unquestioning agents of military and national policies they found untenable.

Paramount in the program of COM is a fervent opposition to the continuing military effort in Vietnam. COM decries the military policies that turned an internal political struggle into a nation-destroying bloodbath. The application of American military power in Vietnam was as unnecessary as it was unworkable.

COM further abhors the military mentality that promotes absurd measures like the body count; that leads to the indiscriminate slaughter of innocent civilians; that destroys land and villages and calls it victory.}}

While stating they were "loyal, responsible military officers", they supported "a cease-fire and the rapid disengagement of American troops from Southeast Asia", opposed the "preponderant share of national resources devoted to the military", and called for the "free expression of dissenting opinion" within the military.

The fact that military officers had formed a group openly speaking out against the war and the U.S. military was unprecedented and quickly reached the national media. On June 3, 1970, The New York Times announced that the "antiwar movement has reached the United States military officers corps." "Calling themselves the Concerned Officers Movement, about 25 officers based in Washington, most of them Navy men, have banded together to provide a forum for what they say is growing disillusionment among their ranks with the Indochina war."{{cite news|date=1970-06-03|title=Military Officers Join Drive Against the War|work=The New York Times}}

COM continued to grow and on September 26, 1970, 28 members representing about 250 others on active duty from the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps held a press conference in Washington, D.C., to announce "their intention to speak against the war in Vietnam" and "to encourage other officers to express antiwar opinions".{{cite thesis |type=PhD |last=Currin Jr. |first=Scovill Wannamaker |date=2015 |title=An Army of the Willing: Fayette'Nam, Soldier Dissent, and the Untold Story of the All-Volunteer Force |publisher=Duke University, Department of History}}{{rp|213}} Font told the press, "I reject this war....I have asked myself time and again: 'When the law becomes a crime, consensus and conformity becomes a crime, am I to condone it?' My answer is no." Major Albert Braverman, a physician at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, stated that COM had active chapters at the Marine base at Camp Lejeune, NC, at Navy and Marine bases in Norfolk, VA, Pensacola, FL and San Diego, at Army bases at Fort Bragg, NC, and Fort Jackson, SC, at the Air Force base in Grand Forks, ND, and in Iceland and Hawaii. They also read an open letter to Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird demanding an immediate withdrawal from the war written by LTJG John Kent, USN, an Annapolis graduate, all-American wrestler and jet fighter pilot, and signed by 29 officers of the San Diego chapter of COM ranging in rank from ensign to lieutenant commander.{{cite news |last=Franklin |first=Ben |date=1970-10-23 |title=Antiwar Officers See Retaliation |work=The New York Times }}{{cite news |last=Sell |first=Ted |date=1970-10-26 |title=Navy Officers Unite to From Antiwar Group |work=Los Angeles Times }}{{cite web|url=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_Kent_Letter_to_the_Secretary_of_Defense_25Sep1970.pdf|title=English: Letter written by LTJG John Kent and signed by 28 other officers to the Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird demanding an immediate withdrawal from the Vietnam War.|last=JohnKent|date=25 September 1970|publisher=|via=Wikimedia Commons}}

COM carried out a variety of antiwar activities throughout 1970 and 1971. It published a newsletter, which by the fourth issue was called COMmon Sense, distributing it throughout the armed services. It bought newspaper ads calling for an immediate withdrawal of American forces from Vietnam, wrote leaflets, printed posters and held press conferences. COM's Norfolk Naval Base chapter paid for a billboard outside the base that read Peace Now. In May 1971, 29 officers from Fort Bragg and Pope Air Force Base took out a "scathing antiwar" ad in the Fayetteville Observer which they openly signed with name, rank and military branch. This was the first time this many military officers from one place publicly opposed the war. Soon, officers from Fort Jackson, Fort Knox and Minot Air Force Base were signing similar ads in their local papers. On September 13, 1971, over 130 officers from all over the U.S. signed a full-page antiwar ad in the Washington Post.{{rp|242–45}} File:1971-09-13 COM Anti-War Ad - Washington Post.jpg

Initially, many COM members wanted to stay within the military and felt they had a right to express dissenting views. In fact, their third newsletter argued that responsible dissent "can and must be allowed to exist in the military, if it is to keep pace with the times in which we live." "We believe that such expressions of our convictions are within our rights, and that in expressing them, we are following our obligations as officers to defend the Constitution." The organization felt the armed forces were an insular and hidebound world and explored ways to establish the right of free speech for active duty servicemen, both officers and enlisted.

The military, however, disagreed and in many cases reprimanded, discharged and transferred COM members soon after their participation became known. Within three weeks of their September 26, 1970, press conference many COM members were facing retaliation. One Navy doctor in the San Diego chapter was discharged on 48 hours' notice after making his membership known. Official military spokespeople blamed budget cutbacks or force reductions, but COM members were told privately they were being discharged due to their membership. The New York Times quoted a Pentagon spokesman who denied the existence of a "purge" of antiwar officers, but then went on to admit the military did get concerned when these officers "go public". He argued that public statements "[d]raw the radicals to them like bees to honey", making them "duck soup for radicals" and raising "questions about the officers' reliability." Ironically, some members who did want to get out were forced to stay in the military against their will and given orders transferring them to remote military bases like Adak, Alaska, or even Vietnam.{{cite news|last=Kondracke|first=Morton|date=1970-07-13 |title=Anti-War Officers Fight Discharge |work=Washington Star}}{{cite news|last=Lakin|first=Jim |date=1970-11-19|title=Navy punishes anti-war advocates|work=San Diego Independent }}{{cite book|last=Cortright|first=David|date=2005|title=Soldiers In Revolt|url=https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/826-soldiers-in-revolt|location=Chicago, IL|publisher=Haymarket Books|page=109|isbn=1931859272|author-link=David Cortright}}

As a result, COM had a high turnover rate as the military discharged or transferred its members. This, combined with its focus on active duty officers, meant the national organization was relatively short-lived, tapering off considerably by the end of 1971.

In early 1971 COM created quite a stir by holding press conferences on both coasts calling for an investigation into the military's top brass for possible war crimes. Under the auspices of The National Committee for a Citizens Commission of Inquiry on U.S. War Crimes in Vietnam (Citizens Commission of Inquiry), COM held press conferences on January 12 in Washington, D.C., and January 20 in Los Angeles calling for an investigation into the "responsibility for war crimes of key military figures", including Generals William Westmoreland and Creighton Abrams, and Admiral Elmo Zumwalt. While formally they were only calling for an investigation, they presented evidence of war crimes and catastrophic environmental damage, leaving the impression they were accusing their own commanders of war crimes. The Washington, D.C. COM members involved were CPT Robert Master, USA, CPT Grier Merwin, USA, Fox, Font and LTJG Peter Dunkelberger, USN.{{cite news|last=Sheehan|first=Neil|date=1971-01-13|title=Five Officers Say They Seek Formal War Crimes Inquiries|url=http://www.veteranscholar.com/docu21.html|work=The New York Times|access-date=2017-06-09}} In Los Angeles were LT Norman Banks, USAF, LTJG Ted Shallcross, USN, LT James Skelly, USN, and Kent.{{cite news|date=1971-01-21|title=4 More Officers Seek U.S. War Crimes Inquiry|work=The New York Times}}{{cite news|date=1971-01-21|title=Military Leader Inquiry Is Urged|work=Independent Press-Telegram}}{{cite book|last=Cortright|first=David|date=2005|title=Soldiers In Revolt |url=https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/826-soldiers-in-revolt|location=Chicago |publisher=Haymarket Books|page=110|isbn=1931859272|author-link=David Cortright}}

Later that same year COM members used the military's own practice of encouraging the wearing of uniforms to religious services to conduct antiwar demonstrations in uniform, a prohibited activity under military regulations.[http://dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/133401p.pdf] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170611172335/http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/133401p.pdf|date=2017-06-11}}, DoD Directive 1334.1, "Wearing of the Uniform". On April 23, 1971, ignoring warnings from higher ups that their actions would be considered a political demonstration, COM organized a memorial service at Washington's National Cathedral involving more than 250 officers in uniform honoring all the war dead, on both sides of the war.{{cite book |last=Moser |first=Richard |date=1996 |title=The New Winter Soldiers:GI and Veteran Dissent During the Vietnam Era |url=https://archive.org/details/newwintersoldier0000mose/page/89 |location=New Brunswick, NJ |publisher=Rutgers University Press |page=[https://archive.org/details/newwintersoldier0000mose/page/89 89] |isbn=978-0-8135-2242-5 }} On May 2, 45 officers and enlisted men from the San Diego Chapter wore their uniforms to a similar antiwar "religious" event in Exposition Park in Los Angeles led by a prominent antiwar Episcopal minister, George Regas.{{cite web|url=http://content.wisconsinhistory.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15932coll8/id/1620/rec/1892|title=Liberty call (San Diego Concerned Officers Movement) :: GI Press Collection|website=content.wisconsinhistory.org}} As one of the men who participated later recalled in his memoir: "Thus, with one of our men playing the haunting lament on his bugle that is heard at military funerals, we marched with [a] coffin draped with the flags of the Viet Cong, North Vietnam, South Vietnam, and the United States."{{cite book |last=Skelly |first=James |date=2017 |title=The Sarcophagus of Identity: Tribalism, Nationalism, and the Transcendence of the Self |location=Stuttgart |publisher=ibidem Verlag |page=135}} No one was ever reprimanded or punished for these actions, probably because the military decided it would be better to ignore the whole thing and pretend it never happened.

The San Diego COM, located in the principal homeport of the Pacific Fleet,[http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/port-san-diego/], Naval Base San Diego may have been the most active chapter and was certainly the longest lasting, continuing actively until late 1973.{{cite web |url=http://content.wisconsinhistory.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15932coll8/id/1625/rec/1891 |title=Liberty call (San Diego Concerned Military) :: GI Press Collection|website=content.wisconsinhistory.org}} The Chapter was initiated by Kent and local antiwar activist Jeannie Boyle and formally founded in July 1970 by Kent, LT Harold Appel, USN, Skelly and Shallcross.{{cite web |url=http://content.wisconsinhistory.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15932coll8/id/45211/rec/1889 |title=San Diego COM Leaflet Announcing Formation :: GI Press Collection|website=content.wisconsinhistory.org}} Very quickly it broadened its outreach to include enlisted men and women and by 1972 had changed its name to Concerned Military. On May 15, 1971, which they called Armed Farces Day, they hosted the touring FTA "political vaudeville" antiwar show, known to most GIs as the "Fuck The Army" Show, featuring Jane Fonda, Donald Sutherland, Peter Boyle, Dick Gregory, and Country Joe McDonald. The show, held in the auditorium of San Diego High School, was a tremendous success with a capacity crowd of over 2,400 enthusiastic sailors and marines, and contributed to the growth and reputation of the chapter.

File:Connstellation Vote Poster.jpg

They also joined with other antiwar activists in major efforts to mobilize opposition to the departure for Vietnam of several aircraft carriers. The first of these projects attracted antiwar activists from all over California and was aimed at trying to keep the USS Constellation from sailing. The project was initiated by a group called San Diego Nonviolent Action, which united with COM to focus on the role of aircraft carriers. They had the initial goal of stopping the Constellation from returning to Vietnam through education and non-violent activity like a blockade or by preventing military personnel from getting to the naval base. Very quickly, this effort expanded into a multi-faceted campaign.[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:San_Diego_Nonviolent_Action_Harbor_Project_Initial_Statement_April_1971.jpg], San Diego Nonviolent Action Anti-Aircraft Carrier Initial Statement; accessed December 23, 2017.{{Cite web|url=https://exhibits.stanford.edu/fitch/catalog/vm783bv8394|title=Motorboat with 'Connie Stay Home' banner held by Francesco Da Vinci, the founder of Nonviolent Action. In the background is the USS Constellation.|website=The Bob Fitch Photography Archive - Stanford University|language=en|access-date=2019-11-11|first3=California 94305 Copyright}}

As veteran antiwar activists, including Joan Baez and David Harris, became involved, Harris suggested organizing a citywide referendum on whether the Constellation should set sail.[https://exhibits.stanford.edu/fitch/catalog/dg760vz2991 Joan Baez Wearing Stay Home For Peace T-Shirt], Joan Baez Prior to Singing at a Constellation Vote Rally This Constellation Vote became a major antiwar campaign over several months that led to a citywide straw vote in late September 1971 with 54,721 votes counted. Over 82% of voters elected to keep the ship home, including 73% of the military personnel who voted. While not a "real" vote, the impact on public opinion was appreciable.{{cite news |date=1971-09-19 |title=WAR FOES FIGHTING CARRIER'S RETURN; San Diego Poll Being Taken on Constellation's Future|work=The New York Times}}{{cite news|date=1971-09-26|title=Protest Vote Fails To Bar the Sailing Of Carrier to Asia|work=The New York Times}}[http://content.wisconsinhistory.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15932coll8/id/19335/rec/2] Constellation Vote Poster[https://exhibits.stanford.edu/fitch/browse/the-connie-vote-the-uss-constellation-and-the-peace-movement-in-san-diego-1971 The Connie Vote: The USS Constellation and the Peace Movement in San Diego, 1971], The Bob Fitch Photography Archive at Stanford University. Even an unsympathetic observer deemed the overall effort to stop the Constellation "an impressive campaign", and the commander-in-chief of the Pacific Fleet was quoted as saying "never was there such a concerted effort to entice American servicemen from their posts."{{cite book|last=Guttridge|first=Leonard|date=1992|title=Mutiny: A History of Naval Insurrection|url=https://www.usni.org/store/books/bluejacket-books/mutiny|location=Annapolis, MD|publisher=Naval Institute Press|pages=255–56|isbn=0870212818|access-date=2017-06-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170814220401/https://www.usni.org/store/books/bluejacket-books/mutiny|archive-date=2017-08-14|url-status=dead}}

A considerable amount of research was conducted into the role of aircraft carriers in modern warfare by Professor William Watson of MIT who was then a visiting Professor of History at UC San Diego.{{cite web|url=http://web.mit.edu/wbwatson/www/|title=MIT History|website=web.mit.edu}} He argued in a widely distributed pamphlet that aircraft carriers had become weapons "used to crush popular uprisings and to bully the weaker and poorer countries of the world."[https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/10318752], Attack Carrier: The Constellation Papers, September 1971

The involvement of large numbers of antiwar officers and enlisted men created significant debate in the traditionally pro-military town. It also permitted creative methods not normally available to other antiwar groups, such as the CONSTELLATION STAY HOME FOR PEACE banner frequently seen being towed over the city by recently retired navy flight instructor LT John Huyler, and the Constellation Vote stickers found everywhere on board the USS Constellation, including in the captain's personal bathroom.{{cite web|url=https://exhibits.stanford.edu/fitch/catalog/cj188gr6022|title=Plane flying over San Diego with banner "CONSTELLATION STAY HOME FOR PEACE"|last=Fitch|first=Bob|date=1971|quote=John Huyler flying with banner}}[https://exhibits.stanford.edu/fitch/catalog/qn860wq8461 Constellation Vote Logo], Constellation Vote Logo Used on Stickers and Flyers[https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-90100-598566010/praxis-underground-newspaper-v1-no7-october-6#fullscreen Praxis Underground Newspaper V.1 No.7, October 6, 1971 p.9], "Stay Home For Peace Stickers" Land GI in Brig Bathroom stickers weren't the only complication the captain had to deal with. Over 1,300 of the ship's sailors signed a petition requesting the FTA Show be allowed on board. The captain refused this request but then got himself in hot water by intercepting and destroying 2,500 pieces of U.S. mail sent by antiwar activists to crewmembers. Faced with a possible court of inquiry and health problems, the captain was removed from command before the ship sailed.{{cite news |date=1971-06-07 |title=Inquiry Asked in Navy Antiwar Material Case|work=The San Diego Union}}

When the Constellation actually did sail for Vietnam, no visible blockade occurred but nine of its crew publicly refused to go and took sanctuary in a local Catholic church, [https://www.ctksandiego.org Christ the King], with the support of COM members and other activists. The "Connie 9" as they were quickly dubbed, were soon arrested in an early morning raid by US Marshals and flown back to the ship, but within weeks were honorably discharged from the navy.{{cite news |date=1971-10-03 |title=9 Constellation Sailors Seized, Flown to Ship|work=The San Diego Union }}{{cite news |date=1971-12-08 |title='We've Won,' 8 Sailors Say on Discharge|work=The San Diego Union }}[http://content.wisconsinhistory.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15932coll8/id/98297/rec/12], Kitty Litter (USS Kitty Hawk Newsletter) 1972 This action led to other Stop Our Ship (SOS) campaigns in San Diego and other Navy ports in a wider effort to prevent navy ships from heading to Southeast Asia. "A strong resistance movement within the Seventh Fleet was led by COM and its local chapter."[http://content.wisconsinhistory.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15932coll8/id/14339/rec/11], Stop Our Ship Leaflet (USS Coral Sea)[http://content.wisconsinhistory.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15932coll8/id/81191/rec/45], Stop Our Ship Petition (USS Coral Sea){{cite web|url=https://exhibits.stanford.edu/fitch/catalog/qx316ms0992|title=Cindy O'Hara leaflets cars entering Naval base with newsletter|last=Fitch|first=Bob|date=1971|quote=Cindy O'Hare, Stop the Hawk activist}}

File:Confidence to Greenpeace Support Letter.jpg

The chapter in Kodiak, Alaska, was the only one started from the beginning to include all ranks, modifying its name accordingly to Concerned Servicemen’s Movement (CSM). It was initiated by Lt(jg) Norman Bleier from the San Diego COM chapter after his commanding officer deemed him such a problem that he was transferred to Kodiak "to freeze until your enlistment is up." This was not an unusual tactic for the Navy as another member of the Kodiak group, EM3 James Kelly, was also ordered there after initiating a Congressional investigation against the Navy for ignoring his medical condition.{{rp|v1,iI,p4}} And Kent, from the San Diego chapter, had also been given orders to Adak, Alaska, which he only avoided when a Federal Judge ordered the Navy to discharge him.{{cite news |date=1971-03-02 |title=Court Orders Navy to Discharge Officer |work=Los Angeles Times}}

Kodiak CSM, which included both U.S. Navy and Coast Guard personnel, became the most influential GI dissent group in Alaska, both by publishing a well written underground newsletter, FID, and by playing a role in the founding of the influential environmental group Greenpeace. The group’s newsletter was named after a Fid, a traditional sailor's tool still used with knots and ropes. CSM considered FID a means to express its members First Amendment rights, while promoting discussion of the war, officer-enlisted relations, racism, and the ecology.{{rp|v1,i1,p1}} The group had a number of sympathizers onboard the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Confidence. Ironically, the Confidence was ordered to intercept and board the very first Greenpeace boat which was on its way to protest a powerful U.S. nuclear underground test on the island of Amchitka in 1971. Eighteen Confidence crewmen penned and then smuggled aboard a letter of support for the Greenpeace crew and voyage. Its message was clear, "Good luck. We are behind you one hundred percent." Shouts of "The U.S. Coast Guard is on our side" were heard on the protest vessel. This sympathetic action helped influence the members of the Greenpeace crew to found the organization we know today.{{rp|v1,iVII,p11}}{{cite book |last=Hunter |first=Robert |date=2004 |title=The Greenpeace to Amchitka: An Environmental Odyssey |url=https://arsenalpulp.com/Books/T/The-Greenpeace-to-Amchitka |page=117 |location=Vancouver, Canada |publisher=Arsenal Pulp Press |isbn=9781551521787 }}

At its height, COM had as many as 28 chapters in all the military branches and has been estimated to have "had approximately 3,000 members, including many supporters from the enlisted ranks." At one point it even had a chapter in the Pentagon. It had no formal leadership, although various people stepped forward at different times to play central roles. COM did not attract the media attention as dramatically as its more well-known partner and ally, Vietnam Veterans Against the War, but it played a key and underappreciated role in the antiwar movement of the early 1970s. The fact that officers not only resisted the war, but spoke out publicly and formed a significant organization, speaks to the depth of the anti-Vietnam War and anti-U.S. military sentiment in the U.S. at the time.

• F.T.A. – documentary film about the FTA Show
• GI's Against Fascism
• GI Coffeehouses
• GI Underground Press
• Intrepid Four
• Movement for a Democratic Military
• Presidio mutiny
• Sir! No Sir!, a documentary about the anti-war movement within the ranks of the United States Armed Forces
• The Spitting Image, a 1998 book by Vietnam veteran and sociology professor Jerry Lembcke which disproves the widely believed narrative that American soldiers were spat upon and insulted by antiwar protesters
• United States Servicemen's Fund
• Waging Peace in Vietnam
• Winter Soldier Investigation
• Donald W. Duncan
• Fort Hood Three
• Fort Lewis Six
• Court-martial of Howard Levy

{{reflist}}

{{Authority control}}

• [http://www.displacedfilms.com/films/sir-no-sir/ Sir! No Sir!, a film about GI resistance to the Vietnam War]
• [https://amatterofconscience.com/ A Matter of Conscience - GI Resistance During the Vietnam War]
• [https://wagingpeaceinvietnam.com/ Waging Peace in Vietnam - US Soldiers and Veterans Who Opposed the War]
• [https://vimeo.com/user59632642 Waging Peace in Vietnam Interviews with GI resisters]

{{Anti-Vietnam}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:Anti–Vietnam War groups

Category:American military personnel of the Vietnam War

Category:United States military support organizations

Category:Organizations established in 1970

Category:1970 establishments in the United States

Category:Resistance Inside the Army