Confield

Autechre are a British electronic music duo composed of members Rob Brown and Sean Booth.{{cite news |last1=Tingen |first1=Paul |title=Autechre – Recording Electronica |url=http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/apr04/articles/autechre.htm |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=Sound on Sound |date=April 2004 |archive-date=23 May 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120523102033/http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/apr04/articles/autechre.htm |url-status=live }} After the release of the self-titled album Lego Feet in 1991,{{cite news |last1=Robb |first1=John |title=Beyond The Radar: Autechre Interviewed |url=https://thequietus.com/interviews/autechre-interview-oversteps/ |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=The Quietus |date=8 April 2010}} their first project under the Autechre name would come with the release of Cavity Job later in December. The duo's first studio album, Incunabula, was a surprise success.{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/autechre-mathematics-is--the-new-rocknroll-683346.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090331164931/http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/autechre-mathematics-is--the-new-rocknroll-683346.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=31 March 2009 |title=Autechre: Mathematics is the new rock'n'roll |access-date=28 January 2025 | author=Mike Barnes |date=29 April 2001 |work=The Independent}} After signing with Warp Records, the duo would go on to release albums such as Amber and Tri Repetae, which were received mostly positively by critics.{{cite news |last1=Beta |first1=Andy |title=Autechre: Incunabula / Amber / Tri Repetae |url=https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/22592-incunabula-amber-tri-repetae/ |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=Pitchfork |date=21 November 2016}}

With Confield, the duo largely abandoned the ambient and melodic styles of their earlier works such as Amber and Tri Repetae in favour of more chaotic and abstract sound palettes. As their style grew more experimental, Confield and their later albums would see the use of software like Max to form the basis of songs rather than physical synthesisers.{{cite news |last1=Nosnitsky |first1=Andrew |title=Autechre: NTS Sessions 1-4 |url=https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/autechre-nts-sessions-1-4/ |access-date=30 January 2025 |work=Pitchfork |date=15 May 2018 |archive-date=18 May 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180518200054/https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/autechre-nts-sessions-1-4/ |url-status=live }}{{cite news |last1=Suarez |first1=Gary |title=25 Years On: Autechre's Tri Repetae Revisited |url=https://thequietus.com/opinion-and-essays/anniversary/autechre-trirepetae-review-anniversary/ |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=The Quietus |date=18 November 2015}}{{cite news |last1=Mullen |first1=Matt |title=How Autechre's radically inventive music-making turned experimentation into electronica |url=https://www.musicradar.com/news/pioneers-autechre |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=MusicRadar |date=15 February 2024 |language=en}} According to Booth, most tracks from Confield originated from experiments with this software that would not fit in with a club environment.

Confield and later releases by the duo such as Exai would make use of generative sequences done through Max.{{cite news |last1=Frame |first1=Charlie |title=Autechre — Exai |url=https://thequietus.com/quietus-reviews/autechre-exai-review/ |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=The Quietus |date=25 February 2013}} Brown and Booth later noted the use of something called "the system" while making their music; a large network of synthesisers and other digital processes.{{cite news |last1=Sherburne |first1=Philip |title=Autechre on Their Epic NTS Sessions, David Lynch, and Where Code Meets Music |url=https://pitchfork.com/thepitch/autechre-interview-nts-sessions-david-lynch-where-code-meets-music/ |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=Pitchfork |date=9 August 2018 |archive-date=8 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190108100857/https://pitchfork.com/thepitch/autechre-interview-nts-sessions-david-lynch-where-code-meets-music/ |url-status=live }} The duo have also stated in interviews that the music created by this system is not entirely random, and still requires human control to guide and change tracks.{{cite news |last1=Pareles |first1=Jon |title=Autechre Worked in Isolation for Decades. Now It's Unintentionally Timely. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/arts/music/autechre-sign-interview.html |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=The New York Times |date=13 October 2020 |archive-date=14 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201014051235/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/arts/music/autechre-sign-interview.html |url-status=live }}

{{Listen

| filename = Autechre - Pen Expers.mp3

| title = "Pen Expers"

| description = The third track from Confield. "Pen Expers" has been likened to a drill 'n' bass track with hard percussion and high-pitched melodies.

}}

Confield has been described as IDM,{{cite web |url=https://www.allmusic.com/album/confield-mw0000003112 |title=Confield – Autechre |website=AllMusic |accessdate=6 July 2012 |last=Bush |first=John |archive-date=21 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120621234437/http://www.allmusic.com/album/confield-mw0000003112 |url-status=live }} experimental, electronic,{{cite journal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=f4iBwoaNrbcC&pg=PT10 |title=Autechre: Confield / Built to Spill: Ancient Melodies of the Future |journal=Spin |volume=17 |issue=8 |date=August 2001 |accessdate=9 December 2018 |last=Weisbard |first=Eric |pages=136–38}} electronica,{{cite news |last1=Aizlewood |first1=John |last2=Denselow |first2=Robin |last3=Williams |first3=Richard |last4=Sullivan |first4=Caroline |last5=Wyse |first5=Pascal |last6=Aizlewood |first6=John |title=We will rock you |url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2001/apr/27/shopping.culture2 |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=The Guardian |date=27 April 2001 |archive-date=19 April 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160419070846/http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2001/apr/27/shopping.culture2 |url-status=live }} and abstract. In a review for Pitchfork, Malcolm Seymour III described how abstract the album was in comparison to the duo's previous projects.{{cite news |last1=Seymour III |first1=Malcolm |title=Autechre: Confield Album Review |url=https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/365-confield/ |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=Pitchfork |date=17 April 2001 |archive-date=20 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200420225826/https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/365-confield/ |url-status=live }} Seymour III also stated how Confield was a lot less accessible to newer listeners compared to Autechre's previous projects. Mike Barnes of The Independent called the music harsh but beautiful, noting its repetitive beats and its complex rhythms throughout. In a retrospective review of Tri Repetae for The Quietus, Gary Suarez noted how the album treated melodies like "bitter foes", with sounds being timestretched and manipulated. Louise Bradbury of OffBeat noted how melodies "took secondseat" with Confield, with sweeping percussive elements being the main focus of the album.{{cite magazine |author=Louise Bradbury |date=1 June 2001 |title=Music Reviews|url= |magazine=OffBeat |location= |issue=160 |issn=1090-0810 |page=20}}

Tony Naylor of NME called "Sim Gishel" a track with atmospheric, stifled melodies and disjointed beats.{{cite journal |url=https://www.nme.com/reviews/autechre/4997 |title=Autechre : Confield |journal=NME |date=11 May 2001 |accessdate=28 January 2025 |last=Naylor |first=Tony |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130223054842/http://www.nme.com/reviews/autechre/4997 |archivedate=23 February 2013}} "Eidetic Casin" was also noted for its "iridescent chimes". Pascal Wyse of The Guardian commented on the "strange sampled snoring" of "Uviol" and the melodies resembling voices on "Lentic Cathachresis". In a review for AllMusic, John Bush described "Cfern" as a track that "keeps listeners guessing" with conflicting rhythms and confusing beats. Bush also said the opener "VI Scose Poise" contained "bouncing-ball-in-a-ring-modulator production" along with melodies in the minor key. Seymour III compared "Pen Expers" to drill 'n' bass with "vacuum-navigated" percussion. "Parhelic Triangle" contains a brooding baseline and a variety of chimes; Seymour III compared the track to "Acroyear2" from LP5. In Sounding Art, Katharine Norman stated "Bine" contained warped drum machines and disordered sounds.{{cite book |last1=Norman |first1=Katharine |title=Sounding Art: Eight Literary Excursions through Electronic Music |date=2004 |publisher=Routledge |location=Aldershot |isbn=9780754604266 |page=156}} Norman compared the track to a "machine gone mad".

{{Music ratings

| MC = 82/100{{cite web |url=https://www.metacritic.com/music/confield/autechre |title=Reviews for Confield by Autechre |website=Metacritic |accessdate=6 July 2012 |archive-date=4 November 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104190113/http://www.metacritic.com/music/confield/autechre |url-status=live }}

| rev1 = AllMusic

| rev1Score = {{Rating|3|5}}

| rev2 = Blender

| rev2score = {{rating|3|5}}{{cite magazine |last=Wolk|first=Douglas|date=June 2001 |title=The Guide – New Releases|magazine=Blender |publisher=Dennis Publishing |page=105}}

| rev3 = The Guardian

| rev3Score = {{Rating|3|5}}

| rev4 = NME

| rev4Score = 8/10

| rev5 = Pitchfork

| rev5Score = 8.8/10

| rev6 = The Rolling Stone Album Guide

| rev6Score = {{Rating|3|5}}{{cite book |chapter=Autechre |last=Sisario |first=Ben |title=The New Rolling Stone Album Guide |editor1-last=Brackett |editor1-first=Nathan |editor2-last=Hoard |editor2-first=Christian |publisher=Simon & Schuster |edition=4th |year=2004 |isbn=0-7432-0169-8 |page=[https://archive.org/details/newrollingstonea00brac/page/29 29] }}

| rev7 = Spin

| rev7Score = 7/10

| rev8 = Muzik

| rev8Score = 2/5{{cite magazine |last=Green |first=Thomas |date=May 2001 |title=Autechre |magazine=Muzik |publisher=TI Media |page=67}}

}}

Confield received acclaim from critics.{{cite web |last=Leone |first=Dominique |date=15 August 2002 |title=Gantz Graf EP |url=https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/362-gantz-graf-ep/ |access-date=29 January 2025 |website=Pitchfork}} At Metacritic, which aggregates scores from mainstream critics and assigns a weighted average, Confield has an average score of 82 based on 10 reviews, indicating "critical acclaim".

Reviewing the album for Pitchfork, Malcolm Seymour III gave the album an 8.8 out of 10, concluding that Autechre fans would feel alienated by the release. However, Seymour III also noted the high production value of the album and that it was "thought-provoking". Tony Naylor of NME gave Confield an 8 out of 10, stating the release was not "emotionally detached" and calling it both "biologically warm" and imaginative. Spin's Eric Weisbard gave the album a 7 out of 10, concluding that the album was a variety of six minute tracks that set texture-beats against drone-shimmers. Confield was covered in a 2001 issue of Billboard, stating that the duo's music would likely be picked apart, as well as calling them influential.{{cite magazine |author= |date=5 May 2001 |title=Billboard |url= |magazine=Billboard |location= |publisher=Nielsen Business Media, Inc. |volume=113 |issue=18 |issn=0006-2510 |page=65}} It was also noted that the audience should instead "sit back and let [the album] wash over [them]". In a review for Blender, Douglas Wolk described how the duo had moved away from traditional compositions to fractured beats that "detonate in flurries". Wolk also noted how Autechre "[pushed] the outer limits of their craft" with Confield. Louise Bradbury of OffBeat gave a positive review, calling the album "breathtaking".

Some critics gave mixed reviews. Ben Sisario gave Confield three stars in The Rolling Stone Album Guide. Sisario mentioned the "crunching, robotic rhythms" and "clean, spacey melodies" of Confield and Draft 7.30, but also noted how newer Autechre releases maintained a sense of "mind-numbing sameness". John Bush of AllMusic gave the album three stars and commented that the album contained signs of the duo's earlier work. However, he also noted its experimental nature and said it was an album that should be respected instead of enjoyed. Pascal Wyse of The Guardian gave the album three stars, concluding that the release was overly robotic and comparing it to information overload. Mark Jenkins of The Washington Post compared the sounds on Confield to the sound of a skipping CD player.{{cite news |last1=Jenkins |first1=Mark |title=Autechre "Confield" |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2001/05/25/autechre-confield-warp-for-a/25dc4038-bf0c-4e8b-a8ef-a201bbd64cbb/ |access-date=28 January 2025 |work=The Washington Post |date=24 May 2001 |archive-date=27 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170827081707/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2001/05/25/autechre-confield-warp-for-a/25dc4038-bf0c-4e8b-a8ef-a201bbd64cbb/ |url-status=live }} Jenkins also noted the stylistic change from "smooth and pulsing" tracks on the duo's previous works to "ragged and fidgety" tracks within the album. For Muzik, Thomas Green gave Confield a 2/5, likening its sounds to manipulated metal filaments within a dustbin. While Green stated their diehard fans would still enjoy the album, he also said the duo simply "didn't surprise any more".

{{Track listing

| title1 = VI Scose Poise

| length1 = 6:57

| title2 = Cfern

| length2 = 6:41

| title3 = Pen Expers

| length3 = 7:08

| title4 = Sim Gishel

| length4 = 7:14

| title5 = Parhelic Triangle

| length5 = 6:03

| title6 = Bine

| length6 = 4:41

| title7 = Eidetic Casein

| length7 = 6:12

| title8 = Uviol

| length8 = 8:35

| title9 = Lentic Catachresis

| length9 = 8:29

| total_length = 62:00

}}

{{Track listing

| headline = Japanese bonus track

| title10 = MCR Quarter

| note10 = Recorded live at Band On The Wall, Manchester 1998

| length10 = 11:02

| total_length = 73:02

}}

{{reflist}}

• [https://web.archive.org/web/20041223142839/http://www.warprecords.com/ography/release.php?cat=WARP128 Confield] at the official Warp discography (features audio clips).

{{Autechre}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:2001 albums

Category:Autechre albums

Category:Warp Records albums

Category:Experimental music albums