Copyright registration#Requirement of registration

{{Short description|Legal process recording publication of a work}}

{{globalize|date=February 2010}}

File:Copyright Card Catalog Files.jpg

The purpose of copyright registration is to place on record a verifiable account of the date and content of the work in question, so that in the event of a legal claim, or case of infringement or plagiarism, the copyright owner can produce a copy of the work from an official government source.

Before 1978, in the United States, federal copyright was generally secured by the act of publication with notice of copyright or by registration of an unpublished work.Copyright Basics (Circular 1) p.3. This has now been largely superseded by international conventions, principally the Berne Convention, which provide rights harmonized at an international level without a requirement for national registration. However, the U.S. still provides legal advantages for registering works of U.S. origin. For example, a registration, or a refusal of registration,{{Cite web|url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/411|title=17 U.S. Code § 411 - Registration and civil infringement actions|website= Legal Information Institute}} is required before an infringement suit may be filed in a US court and registration is required for claiming statutory damages in most cases.

Requirement of registration

It is a common misconception to confuse copyright registration with the granting of copyright. Copyright in most countries today is automatic on "fixation" – it applies as soon as the work is fixed in some tangible medium. This standard is established internationally by the Berne Convention (1886), which most countries have signed onto since. Registration may be required by countries before joining Berne. For instance, the US required registration of copyrighted works before it signed onto the Berne Convention in 1989; at that point, registration was no longer required for works to be copyrighted in the US.

The observation that registration is not required in the United States, however, has been described as misleading.{{cite book|last1=Thomas|first1=Roger E.|author1-link=John R. Thomas (professor)|last2=Schechter|first2=John R.|title=Intellectual Property: The Law of Copyrights, Patents, and Trademarks|date=2003|publisher=Thomson/West|location=St. Paul, MN|isbn=0-314-06599-7}}{{rp|86–87}} This is partly because registration remains a prerequisite to filing an infringement suit,{{rp|87}} and also because important remedies depend on prompt registration—such as attorneys fees and statutory damages.{{rp|90}} At least one commentator has questioned whether the conditioning of legal recourse on registration is inconsistent with the United States' obligations under the Berne Convention regarding "formalities".{{rp|90 n.11}}

Scholarship on reinstating registration requirements

Some scholars and policy advocates (such as law professor and activist Lawrence Lessig and U.S. Representative Zoe Lofgren) have called for returning to a system of registration requirements and possibly other formalities such as copyright notice. The system of automatic copyright on fixation has been cited as one of the factors behind the growth of so-called "orphan works" in, for instance, the U.S. Copyright Office's 2006 report on orphan works.United States Copyright Office, [http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat030806.html Copyright Office's Report on Orphan Works] (2006). UC Berkeley's Law School held a conference in 2013 on the question of "Reform(aliz)ing Copyright for the Internet Age?", noting that

"Formalities, which in the past three decades have largely disappeared from American copyright law, may be about to stage a comeback. ... [R]ecent research on formalities suggests that we can get many of the benefits that formalities promise for a more efficient and focused copyright law, without the problems that led us to do away with them in the first place."[http://www.law.berkeley.edu/formalities.htm "Reform(aliz)ing Copyright for the Internet Age?"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502015326/http://www.law.berkeley.edu/formalities.htm |date=2013-05-02 }}, Berkeley School of Law, April 18–19, 2013, Claremont Hotel, Berkeley CA.

Registering agencies

  • In Canada, copyrighted works can be registered at the Canadian Intellectual Property Office for a fee.{{cite web|title=A Guide to Copyright|url=http://www.cipo.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/h_wr02281.html|access-date=21 December 2013}}
  • In Kenya, copyrighted works can be registered at the Kenya Copyrights Board for a small fee.{{cite web|title=A Guide to Copyright in Kenya|url=https://www.copyright.go.ke/8-program/2-copyright-registration.html|access-date=19 May 2019}}
  • In the United Kingdom, there is no official registration regime for copyrights, however the Writers' Guild of Great Britain recommends The Script Vault{{Cite web|url=https://thescriptvault.com/|title=The Script Vault – Protect your Script, Secure your copyright}} to members who wish to register their copyright and the Guild's website provides a link on their FAQ page. {{Cite web|url=https://writersguild.org.uk/about/faqs/|title=FAQs|website=Writers' Guild of Great Britain}} Commercial services provide a registration facility where copies of work can be lodged to establish legal evidence of a copyright claim. There are also requirements to file certain published works with the British Library and, on request, the five legal deposit libraries.{{cite web|title=Legal Deposits information from the British Library|url=https://www.bl.uk/legal-deposit/about-legal-deposit|access-date=5 June 2019}}
  • In the United States, the United States Copyright Office accepts registrations. For works created in the US by US citizens, a registration is also required before an infringement suit may be filed in a US court. Furthermore, copyright holders cannot claim statutory damages or attorney's fees unless the work was registered prior to infringement, or within three months of publication.Copyright Basics (Circular 1) p.7.

Requirements by country

class="wikitable"

|+ Copyright Registration by Country

! Country !! Registration Agency (if any) !! Copyright registration requirements

AlbaniaAlbanian Author's Right OfficeVoluntary.{{DOClink|[http://www.zshda.gov.al/legalframe/acl.doc On Copyright and other rights related with it, Law No.9380 of 28.04.2005 (Albania)]}} Registration is acceptable in court as evidence of author's right.{{DOClink|[http://www.zshda.gov.al/legalframe/decision.doc On Creation and Working of Albanian Author's Right Office, Decision No. 232 of 19.04.2006 (Albania)]}}
Antigua and BarbudaNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available.{{Cite web |url=http://www.laws.gov.ag/acts/2003/a2003-22.pdf |title=Copyright Act, 2003 (Antigua and Barbuda) |access-date=2010-02-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081120061353/http://laws.gov.ag/acts/2003/a2003-22.pdf |archive-date=2008-11-20 |url-status=dead }}
ArgentinaMinistry of Justice, Security, and Human RightsVoluntary. Registration serves as presumption of authorship and date of creation.{{Cite web|url=http://www.jus.gov.ar/registros/derecho_autor/beneficios.shtml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070824153149/http://www.jus.gov.ar/registros/derecho_autor/beneficios.shtml|url-status=dead|title=Argentina - Benefits of Registration (Spanish)|archive-date=August 24, 2007}}
AustraliaNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available.[http://www.copyright.org.au/information/cit020/wp0019 How You Get Copyright] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100825143618/http://www.copyright.org.au/information/cit020/wp0019 |date=2010-08-25 }}, Australian Copyright Council
BelarusNational Center of Intellectual PropertyVoluntary. May establish evidence of date of creation and a presumption of ownership.{{citation needed|date=August 2013}}
BrazilVarious, depending on subject matter{{Cite web |url=http://www.cultura.gov.br/site/2008/03/08/orgaos-de-registro-de-obras-intelectuais/ |title=Ministério da Cultura - MinC » Ã"rgãos de Registro |access-date=2010-02-05 |archive-date=2010-03-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100304073622/http://www.cultura.gov.br/site/2008/03/08/orgaos-de-registro-de-obras-intelectuais/ |url-status=dead }}Voluntary. Registration may help to provide evidence of authorship and which may aid in certifying precedence in the case of two similar works.{{cite book | first=Rodrigo | last=Azevedo | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 6: Brazil }}
CanadaCanadian Intellectual Property OfficeVoluntary. Registration is evidence of ownership in an infringement case.{{Cite web|url=https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/canadian-intellectual-property-office/en/guide-copyright|title=A guide to copyright|first=Innovation|last=Government of Canada|date=January 10, 2023|website=ised-isde.canada.ca}}
ChinaNational Copyright AdministrationVoluntary. Recommended, especially for software.{{cite book | first=Peter | last=Ganea | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 8: People's Republic of China }}
DenmarkNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available.{{Cite web|url=https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/copyright/docs-en-registration-replies-denmark.pdf}}
EgyptNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available.{{cite book | first=Makeen | last=Makeen | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 14: Egypt }}
FinlandNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available.{{Cite web|url=https://kirjailijaliitto.fi/kirjailijalle/tekijanoikeus/|title=Kirjailijan tekijänoikeudet}}
FranceInstitut National de la Propriété IntellectuelleVoluntary, may establish evidence of date of creation and a presumption of ownership.{{cite book | first=Pierre | last=Sirinelli | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 15: France }}{{Cite web|url=https://www.inpi.fr/comprendre-la-propriete-intellectuelle/les-autres-modes-de-protection/le-droit-dauteur|title=Le droit d'auteur|date=July 28, 2015|website=INPI.fr}}
GermanyNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available.{{cite book | first=Dorothy | last=Thum | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 16: Germany }}
IndiaCopyright OfficeVoluntary, establishes prima facie evidence of the facts contained on the registration certificate and may be used in court as proof of those facts.{{cite book | first1=Pravin | last1=Anand | first2=Prashant | last2=Reddy | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 19: India }}
IsraelNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available.{{cite book | first=Tony | last=Greenman | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 20: Israel }}
ItalyNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available.{{cite book | first=Paolo | last=Auteri | edition=September 2016 | title=Diritto industriale. Proprietà intellettuale e concorrenza | editor=Giappichelli |chapter=Diritto di autore }}
JamaicaNone - The Intellectual Property Services Centre is a non-profit organization that provides private registration services and is recommended by the Jamaican Intellectual Property Office for that purpose[http://www.jipo.gov.jm/pages/copyright.htm JIPO - Copyright and Related Rights] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100203110331/http://www.jipo.gov.jm/pages/copyright.htm |date=2010-02-03 }}Not officially available, though voluntary registration through the Intellectual Property Services Centre provides rebuttable evidence of authorship and/or ownership. The Jamaican Intellectual Property Office officially recommends the practice of "poor man's copyright" to provide evidence of ownership and creation date.
JapanAgency for Cultural AffairsVoluntary, establishes presumption of facts contained in registration for use in court.{{cite book | first=Tatsuhiro | last=Ueno | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 22: Japan }}
KenyaKenya Copyright BoardVoluntary, establishes prima facie evidence of the facts contained on the registration certificate and may be used in court as proof of those facts
LithuaniaNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available.{{cite book | first=Vytautas | last=Mizaras | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 24: Lithuania }}
MalaysiaIntellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (MyIPO)Voluntary Notifications is to assist in providing prima facie evidence of ownership and evidence of date of creation. This may aid the copyright owner since the voluntary notification can be used in court as proof of the facts made.{{cite web | title=Copyright Voluntary Notification – The Official Portal of Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia | website=The Official Portal of Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia – (MyIPO) | date=2017-07-20 | url=http://www.myipo.gov.my/en/copyright-voluntary-notification/?lang=en | access-date=2019-12-09}}
MexicoInstituto Nacional del Derecho de AutorVoluntary, establishes prima facie evidence of ownership.{{cite book | first=Luis | last=Schmidt | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 25: Mexico }}
PortugalInspeção Geral das Atividades CulturaisVoluntary, offers refutable presumption of copyright and ownership.{{cite book | first=Luís | last=Leitão | edition= 2011 | title=Direito de Autor | editor=Almedina |chapter=Chap. 14: Portugal }}
Russian FederationRospatentVoluntary registration available for computer programs and databases.{{cite book | first=Irina | last=Savelieva | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 30: Russian Federation }}
South Africa

|Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC)

|Voluntary registration available for cinematograph films. Establishes prima facie evidence of the facts contained on the registration certificate and may be used in court as proof of those facts.{{Cite web|url=http://www.cipc.co.za/index.php/trade-marks-patents-designs-copyright/copyright/registration-procedure/|title=CIPC :: Registration Procedure|website=www.cipc.co.za|access-date=2019-12-05}}

SpainMinistry of CultureVoluntary, offers refutable presumption of copyright and ownership, but not required to file suit for infringement.{{cite book | first=Raquel | last=Xalabarder | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 35: Spain }}
SwedenNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available.{{cite book | first1=Karin | last1=Cederlund | first2=Johan | last2=Axhamn | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 36: Sweden }}
TurkeyMinistry of CultureRequired for cinematographic works and phonograms, voluntary for all other works. Registration may be used as evidence.{{cite book | first=Temel | last=Nal | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 39: Turkey }}
UkraineNational Office of Intellectual PropertyVoluntary.{{Cite web|url=https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/3792-12|title=Про авторське право і суміжні права|website=Офіційний вебпортал парламенту України}}
United KingdomNoneNot required. No voluntary procedure available. From 1842 to 1883, many products carried a Registration lozenge.{{cite web | url=https://www.antiquesinoxford.co.uk/sampson-mordan | title=Registration lozenge: Sampson Mordan & Co Ltd | publisher=Antiques in Oxford | access-date=2020-10-05}}{{cite book | first=Hubert | last=Best | edition=December 2009 | title=Copyright Throughout the World | editor=Silke von Lewinski |chapter=Chap. 40: United Kingdom }}
United StatesUnited States Copyright OfficeNot required to obtain copyright protection, but required for domestic copyright owners to bring a suit for copyright infringement in federal court. Not required for a federal court's subject-matter jurisdiction, however, as established through the Supreme Court decision in Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick.{{Cite web|url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-103.ZO.html|title=REED ELSEVIER, INC. v. MUCHNICK}}[http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/03/201003_Heyward.html "Trying to Curb "Drive-By Jurisdictional Rulings": Supreme Court Clarifies Purpose of Registration Requirement in Copyright Cases"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110716164234/http://www.sunsteinlaw.com/publications-news/news-letters/2010/03/201003_Heyward.html |date=2011-07-16 }} by Moses Heyward Registration establishes prima facie evidence of facts contained in registration certificate if made within five years of first publication. Copyright owners are precluded from collecting statutory damages and/or attorney's fees for any infringement occurring before registration.17 U.S.C. § 412 Foreign copyright owners are not required to register before suing for copyright infringement, but at least one court has held that they are subject to the same preclusion of statutory damages as domestic authors.Football Association Premier League Ltd. v. YouTube Inc., No. 07 Civ. 3582, (S.D.N.Y. July 3, 2009)

See also

References

{{Reflist|30em}}

Further reading

  • {{Cite web | title = Copyright Basics (Circular 1) | publisher = U.S. Copyright Office |date=July 2008 | url = http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf | ref=Circ01 }}