Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project
{{Short description|Solar power station in Nevada, United States}}
{{use mdy dates|date=October 2021}}
{{Infobox power station
| name = Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project
| country = United States
| location = Tonopah, Nye County, Nevada
| status = Post-bankruptcy reorganization, restart
| construction_began = {{start date and age|2011}}
| commissioned = {{start date and age|2016}}
| decommissioned =
| cost = $975 million
| owner = Tonopah Solar Energy, LLC (SolarReserve, LLC)
| operator = Vinci SA{{cite press release |title=VINCI completes the acquisition of ACS's energy business (Cobra IS) |publisher=globalnewswire |date=December 31, 2021 |url=https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2021/12/31/2359481/0/en/VINCI-completes-the-acquisition-of-ACS-s-energy-business-Cobra-IS.html |access-date=July 17, 2022}}
| solar_csp_technology = T
| solar_concentration =
| solar_collectors = 10347 × 115.72 m2
| solar_collectors_area = {{convert|296|acre|sqm}}
| ps_site_area = {{convert|1670|acre|ha|0}}
| solar_site_resource = 2,685 kW·h/m2/yr[https://www.nrel.gov/csp/solarpaces/project_detail.cfm/projectID=60 Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project], National Renewable Energy Laboratory
| th_fuel_primary =
| th_fuel_secondary =
| th_fuel_tertiary =
| ps_units_operational = 1
| ps_units_manu_model = Alstom
| ps_units_uc =
| ps_units_planned =
| ps_units_decommissioned =
| ps_electrical_capacity = 110
| ps_electrical_cap_fac = 51.9% (planned)
20.3% (2018)
| ps_storage_capacity = 1,100 MW·he
| ps_annual_generation = 196 GW·h over 1 year (2018)
| website = [https://web.archive.org/web/20181028025814/http://www.solarreserve.com/en/global-projects/csp/crescent-dunes Crescent Dunes]
}}
The Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project is a solar thermal power project with an installed capacity of 110 megawatt (MW){{cite web |title=Crescent Dunes Solar Thermal Power Plant |url=http://www.grupocobra.com/business/project/crescent-dunes-solar-thermal-power-plant/ |year=2016 |work=Grupo COBRA |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160604213753/http://www.grupocobra.com/business/project/crescent-dunes-solar-thermal-power-plant/ |archive-date=4 June 2016 |url-status=dead |access-date=26 May 2019}} and 1.1 gigawatt-hours of energy storage{{Cite web |url=http://cleantechnica.com/2016/02/22/crescent-dunes-24-hour-solar-tower-online/ |title=Crescent Dunes 24-Hour Solar Tower Is Online |date=22 February 2016 |website=CleanTechnica |access-date=15 June 2016}} located near Tonopah, about {{convert|190|mi|-1}} northwest of Las Vegas.{{cite press release |url=http://energy.gov/articles/energy-department-finalizes-737-million-loan-guarantee-tonopah-solar-energy-nevada-project |title=Energy Department Finalizes $737 Million Loan Guarantee to Tonopah Solar Energy for Nevada Project |date=28 September 2011 |publisher=Loan Programs Office (LPO), Dept. of Energy (DOE) |access-date=2 July 2014}}{{cite web |url=https://www.energy.gov/lpo/crescent-dunes |title=Crescent Dunes: Project Under Construction |date= 1 September 2015 |publisher=Loan Programs Office (LPO), Dept. of Energy (DOE) |access-date=17 January 2016}} Crescent Dunes is the first commercial concentrated solar power (CSP) plant with a central receiver tower and advanced molten salt energy storage technology at full scale (110 MW), following the experimental Solar Two and Gemasolar in Spain at 50 MW. As of 2023, it is operated by its new owner; ACS, and in a new contract with NV Energy, it now supplies solar energy at night only, drawing on thermal energy stored each day.[https://www.solarpaces.org/what-happened-with-crescent-dunes/ What happened with Crescent Dunes?]
Startup energy venture company SolarReserve (created via seed funding), US Renewables Group, and United Technologies were the original owners of Tonopah Solar Energy LLC, the owner and operator of the Crescent Dunes plant. The Crescent Dunes project was subsequently backed by a $737 million in U.S. government loan guarantees and by Tonopah partnering with Cobra Thermosolar Plants, Inc. The overall venture had a projected cost of less than $1 billion.{{Cite web | url=https://www.swfinstitute.org/news/80796/us-taxpayer-backed-tonopah-solar-energy-files-for-bankruptcy-protection | title=US Taxpayer Backed Tonopah Solar Energy Files for Bankruptcy Protection - SWFI }} The plant suffered several design, construction and technical problems and, having not produced power since April 2019, its sole customer, NV Energy, subsequently terminated its contract. Bloomberg reported that NV Energy was not allowed to sever its agreement with the plant until after the DoE took over the shuttered plant in August 2019.{{cite web |last1=Delbert |first1=Caroline |title=The $1 Billion Solar Plant Is an Obsolete, Expensive Flop |url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/a30472835/crescent-dunes-solar-plant/ |website=www.popularmechanics.com |date=January 10, 2020 |publisher=Hearst Digital Media|url-status= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210121042956/https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/a30472835/crescent-dunes-solar-plant/ |archive-date=21 January 2021 |access-date=27 January 2022|quote=Bloomberg reports that even though the plant shut down in April 2019, NV Energy was not allowed to sever its agreement with the plant until late in 2019, after the DoE was forced to take over the shuttered plant in August. SolarReserve took the DoE to court.}}{{cite web |url=https://www.reviewjournal.com/business/energy/tonopah-solar-plant-could-end-up-in-bankruptcy-developer-says-1865917/ |title=Tonopah solar plant could end up in bankruptcy, developer says |last=Schulz |first=Bailey |date=7 October 2019 |editor-last=Cook |editor-first=Glenn |website=www.reviewjournal.com |publisher=J. Keith Moyer |location=Las Vegas |access-date=26 February 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191008050908/https://www.reviewjournal.com/business/energy/tonopah-solar-plant-could-end-up-in-bankruptcy-developer-says-1865917/ |archive-date=8 October 2019 |quote=... major decisions — such as bankruptcy proceedings — require a unanimous vote from the managers, the lawsuit alleges that the Energy Department can determine the fate of Tonopah Solar Energy without any representation of SolarReserve on the board}}
Since the initial failure of the Crescent Dunes project, SolarReserve took down its website and is believed to have permanently ceased operations.{{Cite web|url=https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/americas-concentrated-solar-power-companies-have-all-but-disappeared|title=America’s Concentrated Solar Power Companies Have All but Disappeared|website=www.greentechmedia.com|accessdate=September 17, 2023}}{{Cite web | url=https://www.evwind.es/2020/02/07/the-closure-of-solarreserve-an-isolated-case-of-the-concentrated-solar-power-industry/73461 | title=The closure of SolarReserve, an isolated case of the concentrated solar power industry | REVE News of the wind sector in Spain and in the world | date=February 7, 2020 }} Upon the developer's silence as the involved parties sought legal recourse, the plant's exact status was publicly unknown for some time and was left to conjecture.{{Cite news | url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-06/a-1-billion-solar-plant-was-obsolete-before-it-ever-went-online | title=A $1 Billion Solar Plant Was Obsolete Before It Ever Went Online | newspaper=Bloomberg.com | date=January 6, 2020 }}{{Cite web|url=https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-future-of-crescent-dunes-solar-plant-near-tonopah-appears-bleak-1866768/|title=EDITORIAL: Future of Crescent Dunes solar plant near Tonopah appears bleak|date=October 9, 2019}}{{Cite web|url=https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/nv-energy-sends-termination-notice-to-massive-tonopah-solar-project-developer-accuses-energy-department-of-taking-over|title=NV Energy sends termination notice to massive Tonopah solar project, developer accuses Energy Department of taking over|date=October 6, 2019|website=The Nevada Independent}}
While proceeding through its subsequent bankruptcy proceedings, Tonopah Solar Energy stated that it had hopes for a restart of the Crescent Dunes plant by the end of 2020.{{Cite web | url=https://www.law360.com/delaware/articles/1297268/bankrupt-solar-project-owner-hopes-for-year-end-restart | title=Bankrupt Solar Project Owner Hopes for Year-End Restart - Law360 }}{{Cite web | url=https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2020/08/03/post-bankruptcy-and-doe-loan-owner-of-crescent-dunes-wants-csp-plant-online-by-years-end/ | title=Post bankruptcy, Crescent Dunes CSP plant owner wants project back online by year's end | date=August 3, 2020 }} According to court documents, Tonopah is owned by SolarReserve, Cobra Energy Investment LLC, a division of Spanish construction company ACS Group and Banco Santander, S.A.{{Cite web | url=https://pvtimes.com/news/tonopah-solar-energy-files-for-bankruptcy-87661/ | title=Tonopah Solar Energy files for bankruptcy | date=July 30, 2020 }} On September 11, 2020, the bankruptcy court approved Tonopah Solar Energy's disclosure statement. On December 3, 2020, the Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization plan was confirmed by the court.{{Cite web | url=https://www.law360.com/bankruptcy/articles/1334384/del-court-confirms-1b-nev-solar-plant-s-ch-11-plan | title=Del. Court Confirms $1B Nev. Solar Plant's Ch. 11 Plan - Law360 }} As one result of this plan's confirmation, Cobra now has operational control of the plant. In July 2021, the project restarted production for NV Energy.{{Cite web|date=2021-10-14|title=Solar plant near Tonopah producing power for NV Energy after stop during bankruptcy|url=https://www.8newsnow.com/news/local-news/solar-plant-near-tonopah-producing-power-for-nv-energy-after-stop-during-bankruptcy/|access-date=2021-11-07|website=KLAS|language=en-US}}
History
File:Boden 000298 172859 518225 4578 (36776425306).jpgs at Crescent Dunes]]
In late September 2011 Tonopah Solar Energy received a $737 million loan guarantee from the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and the right to build on public land.{{cite news |last1=Chris Martin |last2=Nic Querolo |title=A $1 Billion Solar Plant Was Obsolete Before It Ever Went Online |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-06/a-1-billion-solar-plant-was-obsolete-before-it-ever-went-online |access-date=5 February 2020 |work=Bloomberg |date=6 January 2020 |quote=Harry Reid, then the Senate majority leader and senior senator from Nevada, cleared the way for the company to build on public land}} The capital stack included $170,000,000 in EB-5 investment through SolarReserve/ACS Cobra partner CMB Regional Centers.{{Cite web|url=https://www.cmbeb5visa.com/project/group-ix-crescent-dunes-solar-reserve/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170328195137/https://www.cmbeb5visa.com/project/group-ix-crescent-dunes-solar-reserve/|url-status=dead|archive-date=2017-03-28|title=Group IX – Crescent Dunes|website=www.cmbeb5visa.com|access-date=2017-03-27}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.cmbeb5visa.com/project/group-xi-crescent-dunes-acs-cobra/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170328020133/https://www.cmbeb5visa.com/project/group-xi-crescent-dunes-acs-cobra/|url-status=dead|archive-date=2017-03-28|title=Nhóm XI – ACS Cobra|website=www.cmbeb5visa.com|access-date=2017-03-27}} Under a power purchase agreement between SolarReserve and NV Energy, all power generated by the Crescent Dunes project in the next 25 years would have been sold to NV Energy for $0.135 per kilowatt-hour.{{cite news |url= http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/doe-closes-two-solar-loans-just-before-the-deadline/ |title= DOE Races Against the Clock: Two Solar Loans Closed, Seven More to Go |first= Eric |last= Wesoff |date= 29 September 2011 |publisher= Greentech Media |access-date= 29 September 2011}}
Ground was broken on the project in September 2011.{{cite news |url= http://www.lvrj.com/news/nevada-solar-project-to-get-737-million-federal-loan-guarantee-130713818.html |title= Nevada solar project to get $737 million federal loan guarantee |first= Steve |last= Tetreault |date= 28 September 2011 |work= Las Vegas Review-Journal |access-date= 29 September 2011 }} Construction terminated at the end of 2013, followed by several months of testing the plant systems. The project entered commissioning phase in February 2014 following completion of construction.{{cite news |url=http://www.power-technology.com/projects/crescent-dunes-solar-energy-project-nevada/ |title=Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project, Nevada, United States of America |newspaper=Power Technology |access-date=29 December 2016}} It began operation in September 2015,{{cite web |url=http://www.nrel.gov/csp/solarpaces/project_detail.cfm/projectID=60 |title=Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project |author=National Renewable Energy Laboratory |date= 10 November 2015 }} but went off-line in October 2016 due to a leak in a molten salt tank. The owners warned the EPC about flaws in the salt tank foundations (and other matters) with formal comments lodged on the record in March 2012 progress meeting with DOE and its engineer present (the lender did not voice any objection). It returned to operation in July 2017.{{cite web |url=https://www.reviewjournal.com/business/energy/nevada-solar-plant-back-online-after-eight-month-outage/ |title=Nevada solar plant back online after eight-month outage |author=Las Vegas Review-Journal |date= 21 July 2017 }}
The plant having last produced power in April 2019, NV Energy—the project's sole customer—terminated its contract in October 2019 on the basis of the project having "failed to produce." Alleging a takeover of Tonopah Solar Energy by the DOE, SolarReserve then raised the possibility of the project filing for bankruptcy, which subsequently happened.{{Cite web|url=https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2019/10/07/will-doe-take-the-crescent-dunes-solar-project-into-bankruptcy/|title=Will DOE take the Crescent Dunes solar project into bankruptcy?|date=October 7, 2019|website=pv magazine USA}}[https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/SolarReserveCSPHoldingsLLCvsTonopahSolarEnergyLLCDocketNo20190791?1570209807 SOLARRESERVE CSP HOLDINGS vs.TONOPAH SOLAR ENERGY, LLC - Docket No.2019-0791] SolarReserve also filed a lawsuit, claiming that the Department of Energy was looking to appoint two new members to Tonopah Solar Energy's board of managers, giving the appearance of the Energy Department in complete control of Tonopah directors which comprise the entirety of the Tonopah Board of Managers. An interim outcome in this regard was that SolarReserve took down its website and was believed to have ceased operations permanently.
Tonopah Solar Energy filed for bankruptcy on July 30, 2020. Pending the approval of the bankruptcy court, a $200 million settlement with the remaining debtors — Tonopah Solar Energy LLC and ACS Cobra — for the return of taxpayer dollars was also announced at the end of July 2020.{{Cite web|url=https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/200m-settlement-announced-over-bankrupt-tonopah-solar-project-2084328/amp/|title = Tonopah solar project part of $200M settlement | Las Vegas Review-Journal| date=July 30, 2020 }} The amount is less than half of what taxpayers are owed on the outstanding $425 million of public debt.{{cite news| url = https://www.wsj.com/articles/energy-department-poised-to-lose-up-to-225-million-on-solar-project-bankruptcy-11596145244| title = Energy Department Poised to Lose Up to $225 Million on Solar Project Bankruptcy - WSJ| newspaper = Wall Street Journal| date = July 30, 2020}} Under the settlement agreement and as a function of subsequent repairs, restoration of the plant to power production and acquisition of new long-term customers, ACS Cobra is liable for an additional $100 million in otherwise suspended debt.{{Cite web|url=https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063659143|title = POLITICO Pro}}
Technology
File:Boden 000140 166043 510376 4578 (36643882391).jpg
The project's EPC Contractor was ACS Cobra, which carried out the engineering design, procured the equipment and materials necessary, and then constructed and delivered the facility to Tonopah Solar Energy. The project includes 10,347 heliostats that collect and focus the sun's thermal energy to heat molten salt flowing through an approximately {{convert|656|ft|adj=on}} tall solar power tower. Each heliostat is made up of 35 6×{{convert|6|ft|m}} mirror facets, yielding a heliostat overall usable area of {{convert|1245|sqft|sqm|1}}. Total solar field aperture adds up to {{convert|12882015|sqft|sqm|0}}. The molten salt circulates from the tower to a storage tank, where it is then used to produce steam and generate electricity.
Excess thermal energy is stored in the molten salt and could be used to generate power for up to ten hours, including during the evening hours and when direct sunlight is not available. The storage technology thus eliminated the need for any backup fossil fuels, such as natural gas. Melting about {{convert|70000000|lb|kg}} of salt took two months. Once melted, the salt stays melted for the life of the plant and is cycled through the receiver for reheating.{{cite news |url=http://analysis.newenergyupdate.com/csp-today/markets/no-drama-solarreserve-commissions-worlds-largest-csp-tower-storage |title=No drama as SolarReserve commissions world's largest CSP tower with storage |first= Heba |last= Hashem |date= 4 April 2014 |work= CSP Today Business Intelligence |publisher= FC Business Intelligence Limited |access-date= 6 May 2014 }}
= The thermal storage high-temperature salt tank buckling failure =
Crescent Dunes was the first large (110 MW) tower CSP with thermal storage. While storage tanks of trough CSP operate at {{convert|400|C}}, Crescent Dunes operated the storage tank at almost {{convert|600|C}}, while keeping {{convert|280|C}} as base (cold) temperature.
Higher temperatures differences result in a greater expansion of the tank floor, generating greater compressive forces around the floor plate. At very large diameters, as the big tank of Crescent Dunes, that resulted in a high probability of failure under cycling loading.{{cite web | url = https://www.solarpaces.org/vast-solar-has-a-fix-for-crescent-dunes-thermal-storage-tank-leak/ | title = In Tower CSP, thermal storage had issues at first | date = 4 April 2023 | website = www.solarpaces.org | access-date = 10 August 2023
| url-status =
| archive-url =
| archive-date = }}
Production
Crescent Dunes began operation in September 2015, but went off-line in October 2016 due to a leak in a molten salt tank. It returned to operation in July 2017. While its average monthly production was expected to exceed 40,000 MWh, as of May 2019 it never reached that value and only exceeded half of it during 9 months.{{Cite web|url=https://reneweconomy.com.au/solarreserve-still-falling-short-at-flagship-solar-tower-project-13928/|title=SolarReserve still falling short at flagship solar tower project|first=David|last=Leitch|date=February 8, 2018|website=RenewEconomy}}
class=wikitable style="text-align:right; font-size:0.9em;"
|+Generation (MW·h) of Crescent Dunes Solar Energy{{cite web |url=https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/57275/?pin=ELEC.PLANT.GEN.57275-SUN-ALL.M&linechart=ELEC.PLANT.GEN.57275-SUN-ALL.M |title=Crescent Dunes Solar Energy, Monthly |work=Electricity Data Browser |publisher=Energy Information Administration |access-date=December 17, 2021}} | |||||||||||||
Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015
| || || || || || || || || || 1,703 || 1,831 || 0 ! 3,534 | |||||||||||||
2016
| 1,508 || 9,121 || 7,099 || 2,158 || 11,485 || 6,216 || 25,560 || 28,267 || 30,514 || 5,410 || 0 || 0 ! 127,338 | |||||||||||||
2017
| 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 9,420 || 9,192 || 13,666 || 9,263 || 488 || 0 ! 42,029 | |||||||||||||
2018
| 795 || 5,145 || 5,907 || 13,801 || 10,653 || 33,387 || 23,749 || 33,169 || 31,632 || 21,253 || 8,130 || 8,189 ! 195,810 | |||||||||||||
2019
| 12,889 ||14,431 || 20,041 || 2,807 || colspan=8 style="text-align:center"| Production suspended ! 50,168 | |||||||||||||
2020
| colspan=12 style="text-align:center"| Production suspended ! 0 | |||||||||||||
2021
| colspan="6" style="text-align:center" |Production suspended | 3,974 || 15,445 || 20,796 || 11,929 || 17,489 || 5,088 ! 74,721 | |||||||||||||
2022
| 14,635 || 12,238 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 8,852 || 22,166 || 24,710 || 10,590|| 7,475 ! 100,666 | |||||||||||||
2023
| 8,437 || 2,086 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 6,649 || 14,563 || 13,784 || 18,060 || 10,590 || 6,067 ! 80,236 | |||||||||||||
2024
| 4,556 || 4,122 || 6,448 || 13,516 || 20,968 || 26,227 || 18,093 || 19,889 || 18,790 || 9,549 || 5,607 || 6,637 ! 154,402 | |||||||||||||
2025
||0| | |||||||||||||
- |
The commissioning of a new thermal plant requires up to four years to achieve 100% operating level, from the first grid connection to full production. As an example the Edwardsport production data, whose progression, skipping first partial year, is a 40% output the first full year, 57% the second full year, the next year the progression was stopped by a problem in October, but resumes with a 73% the fourth and next year.{{cite web |title=EuroTrough Helped Cut Ramp-Up Time of China's 100 MW Urat CSP |url=https://www.solarpaces.org/eurotrough-cut-ramp-up-in-china-100-mw-urat-csp%E2%80%A8
|website=www.solarpaces.org |publisher=SolarPACES |url-status= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211219113434/https://www.solarpaces.org/eurotrough-cut-ramp-up-in-china-100-mw-urat-csp%E2%80%A8 |archive-date=19 December 2021 |access-date=8 February 2022 |quote=... thermal plants require up to four years to ramp-up to 100% operating level...}} At Crescent Dunes, it was to be expected a similar progression, but the failure of the storage tanks in 2016 froze the commissioning.{{Cite web|url=https://helioscsp.com/salt-leak-shuts-down-crescent-dunes-concentrated-solar-power-plant/|title=Salt leak shuts down Crescent Dunes Concentrated Solar Power plant|first=Jose|last=Santamarta}} Following that, first full production year was delayed to 2018, starting with a 40% (200 over 500) output.
=Shutdown=
The first three months of 2019 (January, February and March) showed good progression, topping all previous monthly data, but in April the plant was shut down because the project's sole buyer, NV Energy, terminated the Power Purchase Agreement for failure to produce the contracted power production. The power generated also cost NV Energy about $135 per megawatt-hour, compared with less than $30 per MWh available from a new Nevada photovoltaic solar farm.{{Cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-06/a-1-billion-solar-plant-was-obsolete-before-it-ever-went-online|title=A $1 Billion Solar Plant Was Obsolete Before It Ever Went Online|newspaper=Bloomberg|date=January 6, 2020}} However, the Tonopah solar project power is dispatchable while photovoltaic power is intermittent. Levelized cost comparisons must include the capacity payments for generating capacity available to supply power during peak hours. By doing so, low-to-high hourly wholesale electricity prices have been shown to vary by up to four orders of magnitude.{{Cite web|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227357598|title=(PDF) Comparing the Costs of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity Generating Technologies|accessdate=September 17, 2023}}{{Cite web |url=https://economics.mit.edu/files/6317 |title=MIT Economics |access-date=January 14, 2021 |archive-date=February 21, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210221202324/http://economics.mit.edu/files/6317 |url-status=dead }}
Gallery
CrescentDunes.jpg|2012 January – The solar tower under construction as seen from a commercial airliner. The eponymous Crescent Dunes are at lower right.
Crescent Dunes Solar December 2014.JPG|2014 December – Completed site as seen from a commercial airliner.
Crescent Dunes 2024.png|2024 August - Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project as seen from commercial airliner
See also
{{stack|{{Portal|United States|Renewable energy}}}}
Notes
{{reflist|33em}}
External links
{{Commons category|Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project}}
- {{cite web
|url= http://www.solarreserve.com/en/global-projects/csp/crescent-dunes
|title= Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project
|publisher= SolarReserve, LLC
|access-date= 28 April 2015
|archive-date= August 14, 2017
|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170814214605/http://www.solarreserve.com/en/global-projects/csp/crescent-dunes
|url-status= dead
}}
- {{cite web
|url= https://solarpaces.nrel.gov/crescent-dunes-solar-energy-project
|title= Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project
|date= 20 January 2011 |work= Concentrating Solar Power Projects
|publisher= National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), DOE
|access-date= 29 September 2011 }}
- {{cite web
|url= http://energy.gov/lpo/solarreserve-llc-crescent-dunes
|title= SolarReserve, LLC (Crescent Dunes)
|work= Projects |publisher= LPO, DOE
|access-date= 16 September 2014 }}
- {{cite web
|url= http://www.recovery.gov/arra/Transparency/RecoveryData/pages/recipientprojectsummary508.aspx?awardidsur=128618&awardtype=Loans
|title= American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Loans - Award Summary: Tonopah Solar Energy, LLC
|date= 21 September 2011
|publisher= Recovery.gov
|access-date= 2 July 2014
|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140714200723/http://www.recovery.gov/arra/Transparency/RecoveryData/pages/recipientprojectsummary508.aspx?awardidsur=128618&awardtype=Loans
|archive-date= 14 July 2014
|url-status= dead
}}
{{Energy resource facilities in Nevada}}
{{Solar power in the United States}}
Category:Solar power stations in Nevada
Category:Buildings and structures in Nye County, Nevada
Category:Energy infrastructure completed in 2016
Category:Companies that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2020