Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

The groundwork toward this declaration began in 1923 and 1925 with the works of Haudenosaunee Chief Deskaheh and Māori religious leader T. W. Ratana, who attempted to bring issues of Canada and New Zealand's failure to uphold treaties to the League of Nations, United Nations' precursor.{{cite web |url = http://grandrivercountry.org/legal-case-reviews/canadas-forgotten-founders/ |title = Canada's Forgotten Founders: The Modern Significance of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Application for Membership in the League of Nations » Grand River Country |website=grandrivercountry.org |date = January 18, 2016 |language=en-US |access-date=2017-12-14 |url-status=live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171215062509/http://grandrivercountry.org/legal-case-reviews/canadas-forgotten-founders/ |archive-date = 2017-12-15 |df=mdy-all }}{{cite journal |last=Corntassel |first=Jeff |title = Toward Sustainable Self-Determination: Rethinking the Contemporary Indigenous-Rights Discourse |journal=Alternatives: Global, Local, Political |language=en|volume=33|issue=1|pages=105–132|doi=10.1177/030437540803300106|year=2008 |s2cid=55864113 }} Issues of indigenous peoples on a world scale began to be reevaluated in 1982 with the establishment of the Working Group on Indigenous Peoples, formed by the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). Their goal was to create an overarching document that would help protect the rights and privileges of indigenous peoples throughout the world.

The declaration went through numerous drafts from 1994, after a version had already been recommended by the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action in 1993,Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, Part II, paragraph 29 to 2006, when the draft of the declaration was adopted and its adoption at the United Nations General Assembly was recommended by the United Nations Human Rights Council.{{cite web | title=The Draft United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: a vital turning point in international human rights protection | website=Amnesty International | date=July 31, 2006 | url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ior52/005/2006/en/ | access-date=January 17, 2024}}

On Thursday, September 13, 2007, the United Nations voted by a vast majority of 143 in favor (4 against, 11 abstained, and 34 absent) of the declaration. In May 2016, Canada officially removed its objector status to UNDRIP, almost a decade after it was adopted by the General Assembly. By 2016, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States of America, who had also voted against the declaration, had reversed their positions and expressed support.{{cite web |url = https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html |title = United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples {{!}} United Nations For Indigenous Peoples |website=www.un.org |access-date=2019-04-22 }}

Canada has processes underway to better recognize and realize in practice the rights of indigenous peoples.{{cite web |url=https://www.lrwc.org/canada-must-implement-the-un-declaration-of-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples-update/ |title=Canada: Implementation of UNDRIP is now the law |date= June 29, 2021}}

Several states do not recognize indigenous ethnic minorities within their territories as being indigenous peoples, and simply refer to them as ethnic minorities. Many of these ethnic minorities are marginalized from the majority ethnic population in relative social, economic and political performance measures, and their indigenous rights are poorly protected. UNDRIP signatories that disregard the intent outlined in UNDRIP articles include the People's Republic of China{{cite web |url = https://www.e-ir.info/2014/05/27/china-the-un-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples-the-tibetan-case/ |title= China & the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Tibetan Case|date= May 27, 2014}} and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.{{cite web |url = https://unpo.org/article/22155 |title= Denied Recognition: Vietnam's refusal to recognize the indigenous and religious rights of the Khmer Krom}}

Due to the past and ongoing violence and abuse of indigenous individuals and peoples, the UN created this non-legally binding declaration as an aspiration for how indigenous individuals and peoples should be treated.

This declaration is a resolution, meaning it is not a law-bearing document. Indigenous peoples are not considered political nation-states and do not have access to international law protection through the international court of justice. Article 40 states that indigenous peoples have the right to fair procedures for the resolution of conflicts and disputes with countries or other parties. Because indigenous people cannot use the International Court of Justice, UNDRIP has no indication of which judicial power indigenous peoples are to bring disputes to.

The declaration's purpose is not to create new rights, but rather addresses topics such as indigenous reconciliation in regard to restoring and protecting culture, traditions, and indigenous institutions, and the pursuit of self-determined development.{{cite web |url = https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/indigenous-people/new-relationship/frequently-asked-questions-the-united-nations-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples |title = FAQ: B.C. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act – Province of British Columbia |author = Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation |website = www2.gov.bc.ca |access-date = 2019-11-15 |archive-date = November 23, 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20211123084046/https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/indigenous-people/new-relationship/frequently-asked-questions-the-united-nations-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples |url-status = dead }}

The declaration is structured as a United Nations resolution, with 23 preambular clauses and 46 articles. Most articles include an aspiration for how the State should promote and protect the rights of indigenous people (see Provision for further explanation). Major themes of the articles include:{{cite web|title= United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: United Nations Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 13 September 2007 | url=https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf|publisher= United Nations |date=2007| pages=22–23}}

• Rights of self-determination of indigenous individuals and peoples (articles 1–8; 33–34)
• The difference is between the individual and people's group
• Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.
• Rights of indigenous individuals and people to protect their culture through practices, languages, education, media, and religion, including control of their intellectual property (articles 9–15, 16, 25, and 31)
• Asserts the indigenous peoples' right to own type of governance and to economic development (articles 17–21, 35–37)
• Health rights (articles 23–24)
• Protection of subgroups ex. elderly, women, and children (article 22)
• Land rights from ownership (including reparation, or return of land i.e. article 10) to environmental issues (articles 26–30, and 32)
• Dictates how this document should be understood in future reference (articles 38–46).

The opening and article 2 of the declaration provide that "indigenous peoples are equal to all other peoples" (source). Besides asserting the rights that indigenous individuals and peoples have as other peoples, there are articles (23 of the 46) pointing to how States should interact with the declaration. Most of the articles point to States working in conjunction with the indigenous peoples. Some measures countries are suggested to take are:

• To return land (article 26), ceremonial objects (article 12), and human remains (article 12)
• To place "programmes for monitoring, maintaining, and restoring the health of indigenous peoples" (article 29)
• To protect and uphold the rights of indigenous individuals and peoples (subpoint in many articles; see Declaration)

{{Infobox UN resolution

| number = 61/295

| organ = GA

| date = 13 September

| year = 2007

| meeting =

| code = A/61/295

| document = https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf

| for = 143

| abstention = 11

| against = 4

| absent = 34

| subject = {{nowrap|Indigenous rights}}

| result = Adopted

| image =

| caption =

}}

The declaration was over 25 years in the making. The idea originated in 1982 when the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) set up its Working Group on Indigenous Populations (WGIP), established as a result of a study by Special Rapporteur José Ricardo Martínez Cobo on the problem of discrimination faced by indigenous peoples. Tasked with developing human rights standards that would protect indigenous peoples, in 1985 the working group began working on drafting the declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The draft was finished in 1993 and was submitted to the Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, which gave its approval the following year. During this the International Labour Organization adopted the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (C169).

The draft declaration was then referred to the Commission on Human Rights, which established another working group to examine its terms. Over the following years this working group met on 11 occasions to examine and fine-tune the draft declaration and its provisions. Progress was slow because of certain states' concerns regarding some key provisions of the declaration, such as indigenous peoples' right to self-determination and the control over natural resources existing on indigenous peoples' traditional lands.[https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/declaration.html Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Adopted by the Human Rights Council on 29 June 2006] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120120122457/http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/declaration.html |date=January 20, 2012 }} United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. The final version of the declaration was adopted on June 29, 2006, by the 47-member Human Rights Council (the successor body to the Commission on Human Rights), with 30 member states in favour, 2 against, 12 abstentions, and 3 absentees.[https://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=19056&Cr=rights&Cr1=council UN Human Rights Council adopts documents on disappearances and indigenous peoples] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170913135207/http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=19056&Cr=rights&Cr1=council |date=September 13, 2017 }} United Nations News Centre, 29 June 2006.

The declaration (document A/61/L.67) was then referred to the General Assembly, which voted on the adoption of the proposal on September 13, 2007, during its 61st regular session.{{Cite news |date=2007-09-13 |title=Indigenous rights outlined by UN |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/6993776.stm |access-date=2025-06-01 |language=en-GB}}

The vote was as follows:

All four member states that voted against have their origins as settler colonies of the British Empire, and have a majority of non-indigenous population. Since then, all four countries have moved to endorse the declaration in some informal way in which it would not actually become binding law pleadable in court. Canada, under a Conservative Party leadership made official public statements against the application of the UNDRIP in Canada.{{cite web|title=Canada's Opposition to UNDRIP|url=http://www.kairoscanada.org/dignity-rights/indigenous-rights/undrip/canadas-opposition-to-undrip/|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131130185813/http://www.kairoscanada.org/dignity-rights/indigenous-rights/undrip/canadas-opposition-to-undrip/|archive-date=November 30, 2013|access-date=2013-12-29|df=mdy-all}}

However, the Liberal Government elected to leadership in 2015, has unequivocally indicated Canada's support for UNDRIP. On December 3, 2020, Bill C-15 was introduced to the House of Commons that would bring Canadian law into alignment with the UN resolution.{{cite news|title=Liberals introduce bill to implement UN Indigenous rights declaration {{!}} CBC News|language=en-US|work=CBC|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberals-introduce-undrip-legislation-1.5826523|access-date=2020-12-04}}{{cite web|title=LEGISinfo – House Government Bill C-15 (43–2)|url=https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?Language=E&billId=11007812|access-date=2020-12-04|website=www.parl.ca}} Bill C-15 passed Canada's senate on June 16, 2021, and received royal assent on June 21, 2021, to become law. In doing so Canada became the first of the four countries that originally voted against the UNDRIP to adopt it into law.{{Cite web|last=Aiello|first=Rachel|date=2021-06-16|title=Bill to align Canadian law with UN Indigenous rights declaration passes to become law|url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/bill-to-align-canadian-law-with-un-indigenous-rights-declaration-passes-to-become-law-1.5473285|access-date=2021-06-17|website=CTVNews|language=en}}

Australian Government interventions have been challenged under its terms without success.{{cite web|title=UW Law Digital Commons|url=http://digital.law.washington.edu/dspace-law/bitstream/handle/1773.1/1233/22PRLPJ247.pdf?sequence=1|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131230234111/http://digital.law.washington.edu/dspace-law/bitstream/handle/1773.1/1233/22PRLPJ247.pdf?sequence=1|archive-date=December 30, 2013|access-date=2013-12-29|df=mdy-all}}

Three abstaining countries, Colombia, Samoa, and Ukraine have since endorsed the document.UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, [https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/declaration.html United Nations Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120120122457/http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/declaration.html|date=January 20, 2012}}.

In contrast to the declaration's initial rejection by Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States over legal concerns (all four countries later switched their positions to accepting the declaration as a non-legally-binding document), United Nations officials and other world leaders expressed pleasure at its adoption. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described it as a "historic moment when UN Member States and indigenous peoples have reconciled with their painful histories and are resolved to move forward together on the path of human rights, justice and development for all." Louise Arbour, a former justice of the Supreme Court of Canada then serving as the UN's High Commissioner for Human Rights, expressed satisfaction at the hard work and perseverance that had finally "borne fruit in the most comprehensive statement to date of indigenous peoples' rights." Similarly, news of the declaration's adoption was greeted with jubilation in Africa[http://allafrica.com/stories/200709131047.html Africa: Jubilation as UN Approves Indigenous Peoples Declaration] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070926215212/http://allafrica.com/stories/200709131047.html |date=September 26, 2007 }} AllAfrica.com, 13 September 2007. and, present at the General Assembly session in New York, Bolivian foreign minister David Choquehuanca said that he hoped the member states that had voted against or abstained would reconsider their refusal to support a document he described as being as important as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/448939.html Aprueba ONU declaración de derechos indígenas] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080306055618/http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/448939.html |date=March 6, 2008 }} El Universal, 13 September 2007. Bolivia has become the first country to approve the U.N. declaration of indigenous rights. Evo Morales, President of Bolivia, stated, "We are the first country to turn this declaration into a law and that is important, brothers and sisters. We recognize and salute the work of our representatives. But if we were to remember the indigenous fight clearly, many of us who are sensitive would end up crying in remembering the discrimination, the scorn."

Stephen Corry, director of the international indigenous rights organization Survival International, said, "The declaration has been debated for nearly a quarter century. Years which have seen many tribal peoples, such as the Akuntsu and Kanoê in Brazil, decimated and others, such as the Innu in Canada, brought to the edge. Governments that oppose it are shamefully fighting against the human rights of their most vulnerable peoples. Claims they make to support human rights in other areas will be seen as hypocritical."{{cite web|url=http://www.survivalinternational.org/news/2499|title=After 22 years, UN votes on indigenous peoples declaration|author=Survival International|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100429234520/http://www.survivalinternational.org/news/2499|archive-date=April 29, 2010|df=mdy-all}}

The Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) formally acknowledges and upholds the principles of the declaration in both their Collection Access and Use Policy{{cite web |url = http://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/docs/about-us/collections-access-use-policy.pdf |title= AIATSIS Collection Access and Use Policy |access-date=12 February 2015 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150318185906/http://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/docs/about-us/collections-access-use-policy.pdf |archive-date=March 18, 2015 |df=mdy-all |website= AIATSIS}} and their Guidelines for Ethical Research in Australian Indigenous Studies.{{cite web |url = http://aiatsis.gov.au/research/research-ethics/guidelines-ethical-research-australian-indigenous-studies |title = Guidelines for Ethical Research in Australian Indigenous Studies |access-date=12 February 2015 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402110814/http://aiatsis.gov.au/research/research-ethics/guidelines-ethical-research-australian-indigenous-studies |archive-date=April 2, 2015 |df=mdy-all |date=2015-01-16 |website= AIATSIS}}

Prior to the adoption of the declaration, and throughout the 62nd session of the General Assembly, a number of countries expressed concern about some key issues, such as self-determination, access to lands, territories and resources and the lack of a clear definition of the term "indigenous".{{cite web |url = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-Z-FzCJ6-Y&list=PL5049A0699834E460 |title=Video Discussions on the Indigenous Peoples Rights Declaration |date=May 19, 2007 |publisher=sommerfilms – Rebecca Sommer |access-date=26 January 2017|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170205181048/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-Z-FzCJ6-Y&list=PL5049A0699834E460 |archive-date= 2017-02-05 |df=mdy-all}} In addition to those intending to vote against the adoption of the declaration, a group of African countries represented by Namibia proposed to defer action, to hold further consultations, and to conclude consideration of the declaration by September 2007.{{cite journal |last1=Crook |first1=John R. |title=United States Joins Australia and New Zealand in Criticizing Proposed Declaration on Indigenous Peoples' Rights |journal=American Journal of International Law |date=2007 |volume=101 |issue=1 |pages=211–213 |doi=10.1017/S0002930000756454 |s2cid=140521665 |url=https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2272549 |access-date=12 October 2021 |issn=0002-9300|url-access=subscription }} Ultimately, after agreeing on some adjustments to the draft declaration, a vast majority of states recognized that these issues could be addressed by each country at the national level.{{citation needed|date=September 2020}}

The four states that voted against continued to express serious reservations about the final text of the declaration as placed before the General Assembly.{{cite book

| publisher=McGill-Queen's University Press

| isbn = 978-0-7735-3006-5

| last = Hall

| first = Tony

| title = The American Empire and the Fourth World : The bowl with one spoon

| location = Montreal; Ithaca

| series = McGill-Queen's native and northern series, 34.

| year = 2003

}}{{page needed|date=September 2020}} All four opposing countries later changed their vote{{clarify|date=May 2024}} in favour of the declaration.

The Australian Government opposed the declaration in the General Assembly vote of 2007, but has since endorsed the declaration. Australia's Mal Brough, Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, referring to the provision regarding the upholding of indigenous peoples' customary legal systems, said that "There should only be one law for all Australians and we should not enshrine in law practices that are not acceptable in the modern world."

Marise Payne, Liberal Party Australian Senate for New South Wales, further elaborated on the Australian government's objections to the declaration in a speech to the Australian Senate:[http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb//view_document.aspx?TABLE=HANSARDS&ID=2481341 Matters of Urgency: United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110524190121/http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/view_document.aspx?ID=2481341&TABLE=HANSARDS |date=May 24, 2011 }} Senate Hansards, 10 September 2007.

• Concerns about references to self-determination and their potential to be misconstrued.
• Ignorance of contemporary realities concerning land and resources. "They seem, to many readers, to require the recognition of Indigenous rights to lands which are now lawfully owned by other citizens, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous, and therefore to have some quite significant potential to impact on the rights of third parties."
• Concerns over the extension of indigenous intellectual property rights under the declaration as unnecessary under current international and Australian law.
• The potential abuse of the right under the declaration for indigenous peoples to unqualified consent on matters affecting them, "which implies to some readers that they may then be able to exercise a right of veto over all matters of state, which would include national laws and other administrative measures."
• The exclusivity of indigenous rights over intellectual, real and cultural property, that "does not acknowledge the rights of third parties – in particular, their rights to access Indigenous land and heritage and cultural objects where appropriate under national law." Furthermore, that the declaration "fails to consider the different types of ownership and use that can be accorded to Indigenous people and the rights of third parties to property in that regard."
• Concerns that the declaration places indigenous customary law in a superior position to national law, and that this may "permit the exercise of practices which would not be acceptable across the board", such as customary corporal and capital punishments.

In October 2007 former Australian Prime Minister John Howard pledged to hold a referendum on changing the Australian constitution to recognize Indigenous Australians if re-elected. He said that the distinctiveness of people's identity and their rights to preserve their heritage should be acknowledged.{{cite news |url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7039823.stm |title = Howard vows Aborigine rights vote |url-status=live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071013004854/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7039823.stm |archive-date=October 13, 2007|df=mdy-all|date=2007-10-11}}

On April 3, 2009, the Rudd Government formally endorsed the declaration.{{Cite news |last=United Nations News Service |date=3 April 2009 |title=Experts hail Australia's backing of UN declaration of indigenous peoples' rights |work=UN News Centre |url=http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=30382#.Wd6q1rDP1qY |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171011233542/http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=30382#.Wd6q1rDP1qY |archive-date=11 October 2017}}

The Canadian Government said that while it supported the "spirit" of the declaration, it contained elements that were "fundamentally incompatible with Canadian Constitution", which includes both the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Section 35, which enshrines aboriginal and treaty rights. In particular, the Canadian government had problems with article 19 (which appears to require governments to secure the consent of indigenous peoples regarding matters of general public policy), and articles 26 and 28 (which could allow for the re-opening or repudiation of historically settled land claims).{{cite news|url=http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=eec0b550-e95a-492b-8801-6ede20a2d35e|title=Factbox: What is the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples?|newspaper=National Post|date=13 September 2007|access-date=25 June 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102195634/http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=eec0b550-e95a-492b-8801-6ede20a2d35e|archive-date=November 2, 2012|df=mdy-all}}

Former Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Chuck Strahl, described the document as "unworkable in a Western democracy under a constitutional government."{{cite news |url = http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=23df9769-3423-4f43-b828-a755725c2719&k=23677 |title = Native rights declaration inconsistent with legal tradition: Strahl |newspaper=National Post|date=13 September 2007 |access-date = 2010-06-25 |url-status=dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111011071636/http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=23df9769-3423-4f43-b828-a755725c2719&k=23677 |archive-date= 2011-10-11 |df=mdy-all }} Strahl elaborated, saying "In Canada, you are balancing individual rights vs. collective rights, and (this) document ... has none of that. By signing on, you default to this document by saying that the only rights in play here are the rights of the First Nations. And, of course, in Canada, that's inconsistent with our constitution." He gave an example: "In Canada ... you negotiate on this ... because (native rights) don't trump all other rights in the country. You need also to consider the people who have sometimes also lived on those lands for two or three hundred years, and have hunted and fished alongside the First Nations."{{cite news |url = http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=5a03839b-6ee5-4391-8cd8-fe9338ac7baf |title=Tories defend 'no' in native rights vote |newspaper=Canwest News Service |date=14 September 2007 |access-date = 2010-06-25 |url-status=dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080307021048/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=5a03839b-6ee5-4391-8cd8-fe9338ac7baf |archive-date=2008-03-07 |df=mdy-all}}

The Assembly of First Nations passed a resolution in December 2007 to invite Presidents Hugo Chávez and Evo Morales to Canada to put pressure on the government to sign the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, calling the two heads of state "visionary leaders" and demanding Canada resign its membership on the United Nations Human Rights Council.{{cite news |url = http://www.handsoffvenezuela.org/canadian_indigenous_leaders_invite_chavez.htm |first=Jorge|last=Barrera|title=AFN plans to invite "visionary" Chavez to visit Canada|newspaper=Canwest News Service|date=7 Feb 2008|access-date=25 June 2010|url-status=dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110522075415/http://www.handsoffvenezuela.org/canadian_indigenous_leaders_invite_chavez.htm |archive-date=May 22, 2011|df=mdy-all}}

On March 3, 2010, in the Speech From the Throne, the Governor General of Canada announced that the government was moving to endorse the declaration. "We are a country with an Aboriginal heritage. A growing number of states have given qualified recognition to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Our Government will take steps to endorse this aspirational document in a manner fully consistent with Canada's Constitution and laws."

On November 12, 2010, Canada officially endorsed the declaration but without changing its position that it was "aspirational".{{cite news |url = http://indigenouspeoplesissues.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=52:north-america-indigenous-peoples&id=7509:canada-canada-endorses-the-united-nations-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples |title = Canada: Canada Endorses The United Nations Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples |publisher=IPIR |date=12 November 2010 |access-date=16 December 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130617031434/http://indigenouspeoplesissues.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=52:north-america-indigenous-peoples&id=7509:canada-canada-endorses-the-united-nations-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples |archive-date=June 17, 2013 |df=mdy-all }}

Anishinabek spiritual leader, Chief William Commanda (1908-3 August 2011) was honoured at the 21st annual week-long First Peoples' Festival held in Montreal from August 2–9, 2011, celebrating Canada's 2010 adoption of the U. N. declaration. AFN Innu representative, Ghislain Picard's tribute praised Grandfather Commanda for his work that was "key not only in the adoption of the U.N. declaration, but in all the work leading up to it throughout the last 25 years."{{citation |title = Political Party! Celebrating UNDRIP and Indigenous Culture in Montreal |first= Gale Courey|last=Toensing|date=13 September 2011|url=http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/article/political-party!-celebrating-undrip-and-indigenous-culture-in-montreal-53604|publisher=Indian Country Today|location=Montreal, PQ, Canada|access-date=20 September 2013}}

In 2015, Romeo Saganash (a Cree Member of Parliament for Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou) sponsored Private Member's Bill C-641, the "United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act", which would have required the Canadian government to ensure that the laws of Canada are in harmony with UNDRIP but it was defeated on May 6, 2015.[https://openparliament.ca/bills/41-2/C-641/ Bill C-641 (Historical) United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160202035651/https://openparliament.ca/bills/41-2/C-641/ |date=February 2, 2016 }}, openparliament.ca

On July 7, 2015, in an open letter to provincial cabinet members, Premier of Alberta Rachel Notley asked each minister to conduct a review of their policies, programs, and legislation that might require changes based on the principles of the UN declaration.{{cite web |url = http://indigenous.alberta.ca/QandA-UN-Declaration.cfm |title = Questions and Answers |date = February 2016 |access-date = July 29, 2018 |archive-date = October 24, 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20181024025815/http://indigenous.alberta.ca/QandA-UN-Declaration.cfm |url-status = dead }}

In December 2015, the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission listed ratifying UNDRIP as one of its national "calls to action" in its final report.

In 2016, Canada officially adopted and promised to implement the declaration fully. Speaking at the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada minister Carolyn Bennett announced, "We are now a full supporter of the declaration, without qualification. We intend nothing less than to adopt and implement the declaration in accordance with the Canadian Constitution."{{cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/aboriginal/canada-adopting-implementing-un-rights-declaration-1.3575272|title=Canada officially adopts UN declaration on rights of Indigenous Peoples|date=2016-05-10|work=CBC News|access-date=2016-05-19|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160516173323/http://www.cbc.ca/news/aboriginal/canada-adopting-implementing-un-rights-declaration-1.3575272|archive-date=May 16, 2016|df=mdy-all}} Bennett described the declaration as "breathing life into Section 35 [of the Canadian Constitution] and recognizing it as a full box of rights for Indigenous Peoples in Canada." In July 2016, Canadian Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould, a member of a Kwakwaka'wakw First Nation, gave a speech that stated that "adopting the UNDRIP as being Canadian law are unworkable", due to its incompatibility with the Indian Act, the current governing statute.{{cite web|url=http://aptn.ca/news/2016/07/12/justice-minister-jody-wilson-raybould-says-adopting-undrip-into-canadian-law-unworkable/|title=Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould says adopting UNDRIP into Canadian law 'unworkable' – APTN News|date=July 12, 2016|website=aptn.ca|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161019012152/http://aptn.ca/news/2016/07/12/justice-minister-jody-wilson-raybould-says-adopting-undrip-into-canadian-law-unworkable/|archive-date=October 19, 2016|df=mdy-all}}

The federal government pledged on 21 June 2017 to rename its National Aboriginal Day to be consistent with the terminology used by the declaration.{{cite news|last=Harris|first=Kathleen|title=Trudeau marks National Aboriginal Day with pledge to build relations, rename day|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-aboriginal-indigenous-day-1.4170695|access-date=21 June 2017|work=CBC News|date=21 June 2017|language=en|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170622033724/http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-aboriginal-indigenous-day-1.4170695|archive-date=June 22, 2017|df=mdy-all}}

In September 2017, the British Columbia's provincial government announced that it will govern in accordance with the principles outlined in the declaration.{{cite web |url = https://energeticcity.ca/2017/09/b-c-government-adopts-un-declaration-rights-indigenous-peoples/ |title = B.C. government adopts UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples |last=Newton |first=Chris |date=September 6, 2017 |website=energeticcity.ca |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170907162553/https://energeticcity.ca/2017/09/b-c-government-adopts-un-declaration-rights-indigenous-peoples/ |archive-date=2017-09-07 }} On October 24, 2019, it announced that it will amend its legislation to conform to UNDRIP.{{cite web |url = https://globalnews.ca/news/6077339/b-c-becomes-first-province-to-implement-un-indigenous-rights-declaration/ |title = B.C. Becomes first province to implement UN Indigenous rights declaration }} BC is the first province in Canada to start implementing legislation in accordance with the UNDRIP.{{cite web |url = https://globalnews.ca/news/6077339/b-c-becomes-first-province-to-implement-un-indigenous-rights-declaration/ |title = B.C. becomes first province to implement UN Indigenous rights declaration |website=Global News|language=en|access-date=2019-11-15}}

The British Columbia (BC) provincial government was the first Canadian province to start bringing its legislation in alliance with the UNDRIP by implementing the BC Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People's Act.{{Cite web|url=https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/indigenous-people/new-relationship/united-nations-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples|title=B.C. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act – Province of British Columbia|publisher=Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation|website=www2.gov.bc.ca|access-date=2019-11-15}} The ongoing process of implementation is intended to propel reconciliation forward in BC. The provincial government has been working with the Assembly of First Nations, First Nations Summit and Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs, headed by First Nations Chiefs of BC to employ UNDRIP principles . The legislation was originally put forth by Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation Scott Fraser (politician), under John Horgan's New Democratic Party government.{{Cite web|url=https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/b-c-makes-history-with-legislation-to-implement-un-declaration-on-indigenous-rights|title=B.C. makes history with legislation to implement UN declaration|first=Derrick|last=Penner|date=2019-10-25|website=Vancouver Sun|language=en|access-date=2019-11-15}} The Legislative Assembly of British Columbia notes that the purposes the Act are as follows: (a) to affirm the application of the Declaration to the laws of British Columbia; (b) to contribute to the implementation of the Declaration; (c) to support the affirmation of, and develop relationships with, Indigenous governing bodies.{{Cite web|url=https://www.leg.bc.ca:443/parliamentary-business/legislation-debates-proceedings/41st-parliament/4th-session/bills/first-reading/gov41-1|title=Bill 41 – 2019: Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act|website=www.leg.bc.ca|language=en|access-date=2019-11-15}} As of November 2019, the BC government has committed to putting almost {{CAD|100 million|link=yes}} per year aside for First Nation communities, in order for them to invest in their own self-governance and cultural revitalization; the province has also dedicated {{CAD|50 million}} to invest in First Nations communities language revitalization. Additionally, they have implemented Grand Chief Edward John's recommendations to decrease the number of indigenous children taken from homes and put in care.

On December 3, 2020, Bill C-15, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, was introduced to the House of Commons by the Minister of Justice David Lametti that would bring Canadian law into alignment with the UN resolution. Bill C-15 passed Canada's senate on June 16, 2021, and received royal assent on June 21, 2021 to become law. In doing so Canada became the first of the four countries with histories as settler colonies of the British empire with majority non-indigenous populations that originally voted against to now adopt UNDRIP.

File:NZ delegation UN Forum on Indigenous Issues.jpg. New Zealand endorsed the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in April 2010.]]

In 2007 New Zealand's Minister of Māori Affairs, Parekura Horomia, described the declaration as "toothless", and said: "There are four provisions we have problems with, which make the declaration fundamentally incompatible with New Zealand's constitutional and legal arrangements." Article 26 in particular, he said, "appears to require recognition of rights to lands now lawfully owned by other citizens, both indigenous and non-indigenous. This ignores contemporary reality and would be impossible to implement."[http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0709/S00272.htm Māori Party's head in the clouds] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930013049/http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0709/S00272.htm |date=September 30, 2007 }} New Zealand government press release, via scoop.co.nz, 14 September 2007.

In response, Māori Party leader Pita Sharples said it was "shameful to the extreme that New Zealand voted against the outlawing of discrimination against indigenous people; voted against justice, dignity and fundamental freedoms for all".{{cite web |url=http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/4202223a8153.html |title=NZ indigenous rights stance 'shameful' – Maori Party |date=14 September 2007 |work=Stuff.co.nz |location=New Zealand |access-date=27 September 2011}}

On July 7, 2009, the Key government announced that it would support the declaration; this, however, appeared to be a premature announcement by Pita Sharples, the then Minister of Māori Affairs, as the New Zealand government cautiously backtracked on Sharples' July announcement.{{cite web |url=http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/2570689/Government-to-endorse-UN-indigenous-rights-declaration |title=Government to endorse UN indigenous rights declaration |work=Stuff |location=New Zealand |date=7 July 2009 |access-date=7 July 2009}} However, on April 19, 2010, Sharples announced New Zealand's support of the declaration at a speech in New York.{{cite web |url=http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/3599153/NZ-does-U-turn-on-rights-charter|title=NZ does U-turn on rights charter |date=20 April 2010}}{{Cite web|url=https://indigenouspeoplesissues.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4850:new-zealand-statement-on-adoption-of-declaration-at-un-permanent-forum-on-indigenous-issues&catid=58:oceania-indigenous-peoples&Itemid=80|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100908110951/http://indigenouspeoplesissues.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4850%3Anew-zealand-statement-on-adoption-of-declaration-at-un-permanent-forum-on-indigenous-issues&catid=58%3Aoceania-indigenous-peoples&Itemid=80 |url-status=dead |title=New Zealand Statement Before 9th Session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues|archive-date=September 8, 2010}}

Despite not being incorporated into law, UNDRIP has begun to influence policy and judicial decisions in New Zealand. For example, the Declaration has been referenced in several decisions of the Supreme Court of New Zealand and extensively in findings by the Waitangi Tribunal.{{Cite web |title=UNDRIP in other jurisdictions |url=https://antar.org.au/issues/undrip/undrip-in-other-jurisdictions/ |access-date=2024-11-25 |website=ANTAR |language=en-AU}}

On 24 November 2023, the National-led coalition agreed not to recognize the declaration as having any binding legal effect on New Zealand as part of the coalition agreement. This coalition government also agreed to stop all work on He Puapua, which is a report on implementing the goals of UNDRIP in New Zealand.{{cite web |title=Coalition Agreement with National & New Zealand First |url=https://assets.nationbuilder.com/nationalparty/pages/18466/attachments/original/1700778597/NZFirst_Agreement_2.pdf?1700778597|publisher=Government of New Zealand |access-date=4 January 2025}}

Speaking for the United States mission to the UN, spokesman Benjamin Chang said, "What was done today is not clear. The way it stands now is subject to multiple interpretations and doesn't establish a clear universal principle."[http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/13/news/UN-GEN-UN-Indigenous-Peoples.php UN adopts declaration on rights for indigenous peoples worldwide] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070916145638/http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/13/news/UN-GEN-UN-Indigenous-Peoples.php |date=September 16, 2007 }} International Herald Tribune, 13 September 2007. The U.S. mission also issued a floor document, "Observations of the United States with respect to the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples", setting out its objections to the declaration. Most of these are based on the same points as the three other countries' rejections but, in addition, the United States drew attention to the declaration's failure to provide a clear definition of exactly whom the term "indigenous peoples" is intended to cover.[https://archive.today/20070612010029/http://www.un.int/usa/press_releases/20070913_204.html Explanation of vote on the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples] United States Mission to the United Nations press release, 13 September 2007.

On December 16, 2010, President Obama declared that the United States would "lend its support" to the declaration. The decision was announced during the second White House Tribal Nations Conference, where he said he is "working hard to live up to" the name that was given to him by the Crow Nation: "One Who Helps People Throughout the Land." Obama has told Native American leaders that he wants to improve the "nation-to-nation" relationship between the United States and the tribes and repair broken promises. Today, there are more than 560 Indian tribes[http://www.bia.gov/cs/groups/xraca/documents/text/idc1-021809.pdf Federal Register, Volume 78, Number 87 dated May 6, 2013] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131019173349/http://www.bia.gov/cs/groups/xraca/documents/text/idc1-021809.pdf |date=October 19, 2013 }} ({{Federal Register|78|26384}}) in the United States that are recognized at the federal level, with some additional sixty-plus tribes recognized at the state level. Many had representatives at the White House conference and applauded Obama's announcement.{{cite news |url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/16/AR2010121603136.html |title=U.S. will sign U.N. declaration on rights of native people, Obama tells tribes |newspaper = The Washington Post |date=16 December 2010 |access-date=16 December 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121111180610/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/16/AR2010121603136.html |archive-date=November 11, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}

The Obama administration's decision came after three consultation meetings with Native Americans and more than 3,000 written comments on the subject.{{Citation | author = U.S. Department of State | title = Announcement of U.S. Support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples | access-date = 2015-03-19 | date = 2010-12-16 | url = https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/184099.pdf | df = mdy-all }} The support of the government also included several interpretations of the meaning of the declaration. In the view of the United States government, the declaration advances "a new and distinct international concept of self-determination specific to indigenous peoples," which is not the same as the existing concept in international law. The statement also interprets free, prior and informed consent, "which the United States understands to call for a process of meaningful consultation with tribal leaders, but not necessarily the agreement of those leaders, before the actions addressed in those consultations are taken."

Speaking on behalf of the United Kingdom Government, UK Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Karen Pierce, "emphasized that the Declaration was non-legally binding and did not propose to have any retroactive application on historical episodes. National minority groups and other ethnic groups within the territory of the United Kingdom and its overseas territories did not fall within the scope of the indigenous peoples to which the Declaration applied."[https://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/ga10612.doc.htm General Assembly Adopts Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples]; {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140925040218/http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/ga10612.doc.htm |date=September 25, 2014 }} at www.un.org

The UK position was also allegedly intended to prevent formal appeal of Canadian decisions to UK courts: Canadian indigenous peoples never accepted the 1982 constitution in which such appeal (regarding early treaties made with the Crown of the British Empire) was cut off. Under the prior 1867 constitution, 1920s Dominion of Canada and earlier law, which continue to apply to these peoples and treaties, the UNDRIP allegedly could have been pled in a UK court in conflicts between treaty and Canadian law. Calls to pursue this approach have been common{{how much|date=March 2019}} among Canadian First Nations people.{{cite web |url=http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2013/09/13/un-declaration-anniversary-draws-aboriginal-calls-resource-control-canada-151257 |title=Aboriginal Call for Full Control of Resources in Canada Based on UNDRIP - ICTMN.com |website=indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130916013804/http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2013/09/13/un-declaration-anniversary-draws-aboriginal-calls-resource-control-canada-151257 |archive-date=2013-09-16}}

Finland signed the International Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples when it was originally put forward.{{cite web |url = http://unbisnet.un.org:8080/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=voting&index=.VM&term=ares61295 |title=UNBISnet |website = Unbisnet.un.org:8080 |access-date=2013-12-24 |url-status=live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121106220245/http://unbisnet.un.org:8080/ipac20/ipac.jsp?profile=voting&index=.VM&term=ares61295 |archive-date = 2012-11-06 |df=mdy-all }}{{cite web |url = http://social.un.org/index/IndigenousPeoples/DeclarationontheRightsofIndigenousPeoples.aspx |title = Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples |website = Social.un.org |access-date=2013-12-24 |url-status=dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130623070256/http://social.un.org/index/IndigenousPeoples/DeclarationontheRightsofIndigenousPeoples.aspx |archive-date=June 23, 2013 |df=mdy-all }} However the reindeer owners and Forest Administration (Metsähallitus) have a long dispute in the area of the forests.YK pyysi säästämään Nellimen porot HS 27.9.2011 A6 The UN Human Rights Committee ordered the Finnish State to stop logging in some of the disputed areas.{{cite web |url = https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=16897&LangID=E |title = OHCHR {{!}} Finland / Indigenous peoples: New bill threatens Sami's rights to their traditional lands and livelihood |website=www.ohchr.org |access-date=2020-01-22 }}{{cite web |url = https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/saami-vs-metsahallitus-case-corporate-recognition |title=Saami vs. Metsähallitus: The Case for Corporate Recognition of Indigenous Rights |website=www.culturalsurvival.org|date=February 25, 2015 |language=en|access-date=2020-01-22}}

The Russian Federation never reversed its abstention from the adoption of the UNDRIP. During the first review cycle of the Universal Periodic Review of 2009, it had accepted a recommendation by Mexico to "comply with the principles contained in the Declaration", yet in the second cycle, 2013, it rejected an almost identical recommendation by Estonia, claiming that its own legislation is already more advanced than the provisions of the UNDRIP.{{cite book |last=Rohr |first=Johannes |url = https://www.iwgia.org/images/publications//0695_HumanRights_report_18_Russia.pdf |title = Indigenous Peoples in the Russian Federation |publisher=International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs |year=2014 |isbn=978-87-92786-49-4 |series = Human Rights Report 18 |location=Copenhagen |page = 54 }}

Ukraine, which initially abstained from adopting the declaration, changed its approach to indigenous issues in response to the recent annexation of Crimea, asserting that Crimean Tatars are indigenous people. In May 2014, the country formally endorsed the UNDRIP.[http://www.iccrimea.org/reports/dont-cry-ukraina.html Don't Cry for Us Ukraina! (Ukraine)] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160625095340/http://www.iccrimea.org/reports/dont-cry-ukraina.html |date=June 25, 2016 }}, International Committee for Crimea, Inc{{Cite web|title=Про Заяву Верховної Ради України щодо гарантії прав кримськотатарського народу у складі Української Держави|url=https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/1140-18|access-date=2021-09-25|website=Офіційний вебпортал парламенту України|language=uk}} On June 1, 2021, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine passed the law "On the Indigenous Peoples of Ukraine", regarding the status of Crimean Tatars, Crimean Karaites, and Krymchaks, which made reference to the UNDRIP.{{Cite web|title=Офіційний портал Верховної Ради України|url=http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=71931|access-date=2021-06-12|website=w1.c1.rada.gov.ua}}

Ten UN member states in the Pacific, all with indigenous majorities, were absent from the assembly at the time of the vote: Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu.

• Related international declarations, resolutions, and treaties:
• Alta Outcome Document
• Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and UN General Assembly Resolution 1654
• Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (C169)
• United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants
• Nagoya Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity
• Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdictions Agreement (BBNJ)
• Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge (GRATK)
• Right to development
• Cultural rights
• Free, prior and informed consent
• Indigenous intellectual property
• Bioprospecting and biopiracy
• International Year of Indigenous Languages
• Settler colonialism in Canada

{{Reflist}}

{{refbegin}}

• {{citation |url = https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf |author = UN |publisher=United Nations |date=18 March 2008 |title = United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples |access-date=20 September 2013 |ref={{sfnref|UN|2008|11}} }}

{{refend}}

{{Wikisourcepar|Draft United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples}}

{{Wikisourcepar|Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples}}

• [https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as Adopted by the General Assembly, 13 September 2007] Full text of the declaration.

{{-}}

{{International human rights legal instruments}}

{{Native American rights}}

{{Indigenous peoples by continent}}

{{United Nations}}

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples}}

Category:Indigenous politics

Category:Indigenous law

Category:United Nations General Assembly resolutions

Category:Human rights instruments

Category:2007 in the United Nations

Category:Truth and reconciliation reports