Duke of Edinburgh-class cruiser

After the preceding {{sclass|Devonshire|cruiser (1903)|4}}, the Royal Navy rethought how it planned to use its armoured cruisers. It decided that they were going to form a fast wing of the battlefleet, which meant that they required heavier armour and armament to fight their counterparts in opposing fleets (thus necessitating larger hulls and higher costs). Two armoured cruisers were planned for the 1902–1903 Naval Programme and the newly appointed Director of Naval Construction, Philip Watts designed what naval historian Oscar Parkes called: "cruiser editions of the {{sclass|King Edward VII|battleship}}s". In these, his first design, he perpetuated the worst feature of the designs by his predecessor, Sir William White, by placing the secondary armament of {{convert|6|in|adj=on|spell=in}} guns in embrasures a deck below the main armament which meant that the guns were inoperable in anything more than a dead calm sea.Parkes, pp. 441, 443 A solution for this problem was offered after construction began when Watts learned that the ships would be lighter than expected and that weight would be available to replace the six-inch guns with {{convert|7.5|in|adj=on}} guns raised to the same deck as the main armament. The change would cost a total of £398,000 for the two ships, far too expensive for the Board of Admiralty, so it was rejected on 30 March 1904.Friedman 2012, pp. 261–62

The Duke of Edinburgh-class ships were designed to displace {{convert|13550|LT|t}}, but they proved to be significantly lighter as built, displacing {{convert|12590|LT|t}} at normal load and {{convert|13965|LT|t}} fully loaded. The ships had an overall length of {{convert|505|ft|6|in|m|1}} and a length between perpendiculars of {{convert|480|ft|m|abbr=on|1}}. They had a beam of {{convert|73|ft|6|in|m|1}} and a deep draught of {{convert|26|ft|6|in|m|1}} forward and {{convert|27|ft|6|in|m|1}} aft. The class was over {{convert|30|ft|m|1}} longer overall than the Devonshires and displaced over {{convert|2500|LT|t|0}} more.Chesneau & Kolesnik, pp. 71–72

The ships' complement was 769 officers and enlisted men.Friedman 2012, p. 336 They rolled quickly with a metacentric height of {{convert|4.2|ft|m|1}} at deep load and their six-inch guns were as wet as predicted.McBride, pp. 379, 391

The cruisers were powered by two 4-cylinder triple-expansion steam engines, each driving one shaft, which produced a total of {{convert|23000|ihp|lk=in|-1}} and gave a maximum speed of {{convert|23|kn|lk=in}}. The engines were powered by 20 Babcock & Wilcox water-tube boilers and six cylindrical boilers. The ships carried a maximum of {{convert|2150|LT|t}} of coalChesneau & Kolesnik, p. 72 and an additional {{convert|600|LT|t|0}} of fuel oil that was sprayed on the coal to increase its burn rate. At full capacity, they could steam for {{convert|8130|nmi|lk=in}} at a speed of {{convert|10|kn}}.

The Duke of Edinburgh{{'}}s main armament consisted of six 45-calibre BL 9.2-inch Mk X guns in single-gun turrets, a much more powerful gun than used in the Devonshires.McBride, p. 363 The guns were distributed in two centreline turrets, one each fore and one aft of the superstructure, and four wing turrets disposed in the corners about the funnels. The centreline turrets could traverse a total of 285° while the wing turrets were limited to about 120° on the broadside due to muzzle blast. The gun had an elevation range of −5° to +15°. The {{convert|9.2|in|adj=on}} shell weighed {{convert|380|lb|kg|1}} and was fired at a maximum muzzle velocity of {{convert|2778|ft/s|m/s|abbr=on}}. This gave it a range of {{convert|15500|yd|m}} at maximum elevation. The gun's rate of fire was about three rounds per minuteFriedman 2011, pp. 71–72 and the ships carried 100 rounds for each gun.

Their secondary armament of ten 50-calibre BL 6-inch Mk XI guns was arranged in single embrasures. They were mounted amidships on the main deck and were only usable in calm weather. The guns could only traverse about 120° on the broadside. They initially had a maximum elevation of +13°, but this was later increased to +20°. This gave them a range of {{convert|14310|yd|m}} at an elevation of +15° with their {{convert|100|lb|kg|1|adj=on}} shell.Friedman 2011, pp. 83–84 Each gun was provided with 150 rounds.

Twenty Vickers quick-firing (QF) 3-pounder guns were fitted for defence against torpedo boats, six on turret roofs and fourteen in the superstructure, all on pivot mounts. These guns were too small to be useful against the torpedo boats before they got within torpedo range. They fired a {{convert|47|mm|in|adj=on}} shell that weighed {{convert|3.3|lb|kg}} and was fired at a maximum muzzle velocity of {{convert|2587|ft/s|m/s|abbr=on}}. This gave it a range of {{convert|7550|yd|m}} at an elevation of +20°.Friedman 2011, pp. 117–18 250 rounds were carried for each gun.

The ships also mounted three submerged 18-inch torpedo tubes.{{#tag:ref|While most sources show the ships with three torpedo tubes, the ship plans included in McBride do not show a stern torpedo roomMcBride, p. 374 and Friedman only lists two torpedo tubes.|group=Note}} They carried a total of eighteen torpedoes in addition to the six {{convert|14|in|adj=on|0}} torpedoes that could be used by the two {{convert|45|ft|m|1|adj=on}} steam pinnaces.McBride, p. 371

The Duke of Edinburgh-class ships had a {{convert|6|in|0|adj=on}} waterline armour belt of Krupp cemented armour that covered {{convert|260|ft|m|1}} of the hull amidships. It covered the side of the ship up to the upper deck, a height of {{convert|14|ft|6|in|m}} above the waterline and reached {{convert|4|ft|10|in|m}} below it. Between the central citadel and the bow, the belt armour was {{convert|4|in|0}} thick and it extended to the stern with a thickness of {{convert|3|in|mm|0}}. Transverse bulkheads six inches thick protected the citadel from raking fire.Parkes, p. 444

The faces of the gun turrets were 7.5 inches thick with {{convert|5.5|in|0|adj=on}} sides and a {{convert|2|in|mm|0|adj=on}} roof.Friedman 2011, p. 72 The barbettes were protected by six inches of armour as were the ammunition hoists, although the armour for those thinned to three inches between the armour belt. Two-inch armour screens separated each of the six-inch guns. The thickness of the lower deck was only {{convert|.75|in|mm}} except for a patch of {{convert|1.5|in|adj=on}} armour over the steering gear and another {{convert|2|in|mm|0}} thick over the engine cylinders. The sides of the conning tower were {{convert|10|in|0}} thick.

The funnels proved to be too short in service and they were raised about {{convert|6|ft|m|1}} four years after completion to keep the superstructure free of smoke in a following wind. In March 1916, both ships had all their six-inch guns removed, the embrasures plated over, and six of the guns were remounted on the upper deck. In May 1917, two more were added to Duke of Edinburgh on the forecastle.Parkes, p. 443 The ship's foremast was converted to a tripod mast to support the weight of the fire-control director probably added in 1917.Friedman 2012, p. 260

File:HMS Duke of Edinburgh 1909.jpg

Duke of Edinburgh and Black Prince served in the Channel, Atlantic and Home Fleets before World War I. They were stationed in the Mediterranean when World War I began and participated in the pursuit of the Goeben and Breslau as part of the 1st Cruiser Squadron, but was ordered not to engage. After the German ships reached Ottoman waters, the ships were sent to the Red Sea in mid-August to protect troop convoys arriving from India. While on escort duty they captured three German merchantmen.Preston, p. 13, Corbett, I, pp. 83, 87–88

The two sisters rejoined the 1st Cruiser Squadron in December 1914, which had transferred to the Grand Fleet and participated in the Battle of Jutland in May 1916.Preston, p. 13 Black Prince became separated from the fleet when darkness fell and was sunk with all hands by German battleships later that night.Campbell, pp. 303, 338 Duke of Edinburgh was not damaged during the battle and was the only ship of her squadron to survive. After Jutland Duke of Edinburgh was ordered to reinforce the patrols north of the Shetland Islands against German blockade runners and commerce raiders.Newbolt, IV, pp. 36, 192 She was eventually transferred to the Atlantic in August 1917 for convoy escort duties.Newbolt, V, p. 135 The ship was sold for scrap in 1920.Silverstone, p. 228

{{reflist|group=Note}}

{{reflist}}

• {{cite book |last=Campbell|first=John|title=Jutland: An Analysis of the Fighting|year=1998|location=London|publisher=Conway Maritime Press|isbn=1-55821-759-2}}
• {{cite book|title=Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905|editor1-last=Chesneau|editor1-first=Roger|editor2-last=Kolesnik|editor2-first=Eugene M.|publisher=Conway Maritime Press|location=Greenwich|year=1979|isbn=0-8317-0302-4|name-list-style=amp|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/conwaysallworlds0000unse_l2e2}}
• {{cite book|last=Corbett|first=Julian|author-link=Julian Corbett|title=Naval Operations to the Battle of the Falklands|edition=2nd, reprint of the 1938|series=History of the Great War: Based on Official Documents|date=March 1997|volume=I|publisher=Imperial War Museum and Battery Press|location=London and Nashville, Tennessee|isbn=0-89839-256-X}}
• {{cite book|last=Friedman|first=Norman|title=British Cruisers of the Victorian Era|year=2012|publisher=Seaforth|location=Barnsley, South Yorkshire, UK|isbn=978-1-59114-068-9}}
• {{cite book|last=Friedman|first=Norman|title=Naval Weapons of World War One|publisher=Seaforth|location=Barnsley, South Yorkshire, UK|year=2011|isbn=978-1-84832-100-7}}
• {{cite journal|last=McBride|first=Keith|year=1990|title=The Dukes and the Warriors|journal=Warship International|publisher=International Naval Research Organization|volume=XXVII|issue=4|pages=362–393|issn=0043-0374}}
• {{cite book|last=Newbolt|first=Henry|title=Naval Operations|edition=reprint of the 1928|series=History of the Great War Based on Official Documents|volume=IV|year=1996|publisher=Battery Press|location=Nashville, Tennessee|isbn=0-89839-253-5}}
• {{cite book|last=Newbolt|first=Henry|title=Naval Operations|publisher=Imperial War Museum and Battery Press|location=London and Nashville, Tennessee|edition=reprint of the 1931|series=History of the Great War: Based on Official Documents|year=1997|volume=V|isbn=1-870423-72-0}}
• {{cite book|last=Parkes|first=Oscar|title=British Battleships|publisher=Naval Institute Press|location=Annapolis, Maryland|year=1990|edition=reprint of the 1957|isbn=1-55750-075-4}}
• {{cite book|editor1-last=Gardiner|editor1-first=Robert|editor2-last=Gray|editor2-first=Randal|title=Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921|year=1985|location=Annapolis, Maryland|publisher=Naval Institute Press |isbn=0-85177-245-5 |name-list-style=amp|chapter=Great Britain and Empire Forces|first1=Antony|last1=Preston|author-link=Antony Preston|pages=1–104}}
• {{cite book|last=Silverstone|first=Paul H.|title=Directory of the World's Capital Ships|year=1984|publisher=Hippocrene Books|location=New York|isbn=0-88254-979-0}}

{{Commons category|Duke of Edinburgh class cruiser}}

• [http://dreadnoughtproject.org/tfs/index.php/Duke_of_Edinburgh_Class_Cruiser_(1904) The Dreadnought Project] Technical details of the Duke of Edinburgh class.

{{Duke of Edinburgh class cruiser}}

{{WWI British ships}}

Category:Cruiser classes

Category:Ship classes of the Royal Navy