Earth's energy budget#Earth's energy imbalance (EEI)

Earth's energy budget includes the "major energy flows of relevance for the climate system".IPCC, 2021: [https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_AnnexVII.pdf Annex VII: Glossary] [Matthews, J.B.R., V. Möller, R. van Diemen, J.S. Fuglestvedt, V. Masson-Delmotte, C.  Méndez, S. Semenov, A. Reisinger (eds.)]. In [https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 2215–2256, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.022. These are "the top-of-atmosphere energy budget; the surface energy budget; changes in the global energy inventory and internal flows of energy within the climate system".{{rp|2227}}

File:NPP Ceres Shortwave Radiation.ogv measurements (26–27 Jan 2012). Brightest white areas show the highest reflectivity (least absorption) of solar energy, while darkest blue areas show the greatest absorption.]]

In spite of the enormous transfers of energy into and from the Earth, it maintains a relatively constant temperature because, as a whole, there is little net gain or loss: Earth emits via atmospheric and terrestrial radiation (shifted to longer electromagnetic wavelengths) to space about the same amount of energy as it receives via solar insolation (all forms of electromagnetic radiation).

The main origin of changes in the Earth's energy is from human-induced changes in the composition of the atmosphere, amounting to about 460 TW or globally {{val|0.90|0.15|u=W/m²}}.

{{Main|Solar irradiance}}

The total amount of energy received per second at the top of Earth's atmosphere (TOA) is measured in watts and is given by the solar constant times the cross-sectional area of the Earth corresponded to the radiation. Because the surface area of a sphere is four times the cross-sectional area of a sphere (i.e. the area of a circle), the globally and yearly averaged TOA flux is one quarter of the solar constant and so is approximately 340 watts per square meter (W/m²). Since the absorption varies with location as well as with diurnal, seasonal and annual variations, the numbers quoted are multi-year averages obtained from multiple satellite measurements.

Of the ~340 W/m² of solar radiation received by the Earth, an average of ~77 W/m² is reflected back to space by clouds and the atmosphere and ~23 W/m² is reflected by the surface albedo, leaving ~240 W/m² of solar energy input to the Earth's energy budget. This amount is called the absorbed solar radiation (ASR). It implies a value of about 0.3 for the mean net albedo of Earth, also called its Bond albedo (A):

: $ASR\; =\; (1-A)\; \backslash times\; 340~\backslash mathrm\{W\}~\backslash mathrm\{m\}^\{-2\}\; \backslash simeq\; 240~\backslash mathrm\{W\}~\backslash mathrm\{m\}^\{-2\}.$

File:NPP Ceres Longwave Radiation.ogv

{{Main|Outgoing longwave radiation|Greenhouse effect}}

Thermal energy leaves the planet in the form of outgoing longwave radiation (OLR). Longwave radiation is electromagnetic thermal radiation emitted by Earth's surface and atmosphere. Longwave radiation is in the infrared band. But, the terms are not synonymous, as infrared radiation can be either shortwave or longwave. Sunlight contains significant amounts of shortwave infrared radiation. A threshold wavelength of 4 microns is sometimes used to distinguish longwave and shortwave radiation.

Generally, absorbed solar energy is converted to different forms of heat energy. Some of the solar energy absorbed by the surface is converted to thermal radiation at wavelengths in the "atmospheric window"; this radiation is able to pass through the atmosphere unimpeded and directly escape to space, contributing to OLR. The remainder of absorbed solar energy is transported upwards through the atmosphere through a variety of heat transfer mechanisms, until the atmosphere emits that energy as thermal energy which is able to escape to space, again contributing to OLR. For example, heat is transported into the atmosphere via evapotranspiration and latent heat fluxes or conduction/convection processes, as well as via radiative heat transport. Ultimately, all outgoing energy is radiated into space in the form of longwave radiation.

The transport of longwave radiation from Earth's surface through its multi-layered atmosphere is governed by radiative transfer equations such as Schwarzschild's equation for radiative transfer (or more complex equations if scattering is present) and obeys Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation.

A one-layer model produces an approximate description of OLR which yields temperatures at the surface (T_s=288 Kelvin) and at the middle of the troposphere (T_a=242 K) that are close to observed average values:{{cite web |url=https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/atmosphericwarming/singlelayermodel.html |title=ACS Climate Science Toolkit – Atmospheric Warming – A Single-Layer Atmosphere Model |publisher=American Chemical Society |accessdate=30 September 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230525201203/https://www.acs.org/climatescience/atmosphericwarming/singlelayermodel.html |archive-date=2023-05-25}}

: $OLR\; \backslash simeq\; \backslash epsilon\; \backslash sigma\; T\_\backslash text\{a\}^4\; +\; (1-\backslash epsilon)\; \backslash sigma\; T\_\backslash text\{s\}^4.$

In this expression σ is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant and ε represents the emissivity of the atmosphere, which is less than 1 because the atmosphere does not emit within the wavelength range known as the atmospheric window.

Aerosols, clouds, water vapor, and trace greenhouse gases contribute to an effective value of about {{nowrap|1=ε = 0.78}}. The strong (fourth-power) temperature sensitivity maintains a near-balance of the outgoing energy flow to the incoming flow via small changes in the planet's absolute temperatures.File:Non-cloud Greenhouse Effect metrics time series.svg (2000–2022) based on satellite data.]]

As viewed from Earth's surrounding space, greenhouse gases influence the planet's atmospheric emissivity (ε). Changes in atmospheric composition can thus shift the overall radiation balance. For example, an increase in heat trapping by a growing concentration of greenhouse gases (i.e. an enhanced greenhouse effect) forces a decrease in OLR and a warming (restorative) energy imbalance.{{cite web |title=ACS Climate Science Toolkit - Radiative Forcing - How Atmospheric Warming Works |url=https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/atmosphericwarming/radiativeforcing.html |accessdate=30 September 2022 |publisher=American Chemical Society |archive-date=28 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220928003445/https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/atmosphericwarming/radiativeforcing.html |url-status=dead }} Ultimately when the amount of greenhouse gases increases or decreases, in-situ surface temperatures rise or fall until the absorbed solar radiation equals the outgoing longwave radiation, or ASR equals OLR.

{{See also|Earth's internal heat budget|Anthropogenic heat}}

The geothermal heat flow from the Earth's interior is estimated to be 47 terawatts (TW) and split approximately equally between radiogenic heat and heat left over from the Earth's formation. This corresponds to an average flux of 0.087 W/m² and represents only 0.027% of Earth's total energy budget at the surface, being dwarfed by the {{val|173,000|u=TW}} of incoming solar radiation.

Human production of energy is even lower at an average 18 TW, corresponding to an estimated 160,000 TW-hr, for all of year 2019. However, consumption is growing rapidly and energy production with fossil fuels also produces an increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases, leading to a more than 20 times larger imbalance in the incoming/outgoing flows that originate from solar radiation.{{cite web |url= https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/oceans-break-heat-record-for-third-year-in-a-row/ |title=Oceans break heat record for third year in a row |author=Chelsea Harvey |date=2022-01-12 |publisher=Scientific American}}

Photosynthesis also has a significant effect: An estimated 140 TW (or around 0.08%) of incident energy gets captured by photosynthesis, giving energy to plants to produce biomass. A similar flow of thermal energy is released over the course of a year when plants are used as food or fuel.

Other minor sources of energy are usually ignored in the calculations, including accretion of interplanetary dust and solar wind, light from stars other than the Sun and the thermal radiation from space. Earlier, Joseph Fourier had claimed that deep space radiation was significant in a paper often cited as the first on the greenhouse effect.

File:Earth_heat_balance_Sankey_diagram.svg illustrating a balanced example of Earth's energy budget. Line thickness is linearly proportional to relative amount of energy.]]

In simplest terms, Earth's energy budget is balanced when the incoming flow equals the outgoing flow. Since a portion of incoming energy is directly reflected, the balance can also be stated as absorbed incoming solar (shortwave) radiation equal to outgoing longwave radiation:

: $ASR\; =\; OLR.$

To describe some of the internal flows within the budget, let the insolation received at the top of the atmosphere be 100 units (= 340 W/m²), as shown in the accompanying Sankey diagram. Called the albedo of Earth, around 35 units in this example are directly reflected back to space: 27 from the top of clouds, 2 from snow and ice-covered areas, and 6 by other parts of the atmosphere. The 65 remaining units (ASR = 220 W/m²) are absorbed: 14 within the atmosphere and 51 by the Earth's surface.

The 51 units reaching and absorbed by the surface are emitted back to space through various forms of terrestrial energy: 17 directly radiated to space and 34 absorbed by the atmosphere (19 through latent heat of vaporisation, 9 via convection and turbulence, and 6 as absorbed infrared by greenhouse gases). The 48 units absorbed by the atmosphere (34 units from terrestrial energy and 14 from insolation) are then finally radiated back to space. This simplified example neglects some details of mechanisms that recirculate, store, and thus lead to further buildup of heat near the surface.

Ultimately the 65 units (17 from the ground and 48 from the atmosphere) are emitted as OLR. They approximately balance the 65 units (ASR) absorbed from the sun in order to maintain a net-zero gain of energy by Earth.

File:Earth's Heat Accumulation.png Land, ice, and oceans are active material constituents of Earth's climate system along with the atmosphere. They have far greater mass and heat capacity, and thus much more thermal inertia. When radiation is directly absorbed or the surface temperature changes, thermal energy will flow as sensible heat either into or out of the bulk mass of these components via conduction/convection heat transfer processes. The transformation of water between its solid/liquid/vapor states also acts as a source or sink of potential energy in the form of latent heat. These processes buffer the surface conditions against some of the rapid radiative changes in the atmosphere. As a result, the daytime versus nighttime difference in surface temperatures is relatively small. Likewise, Earth's climate system as a whole shows a slow response to shifts in the atmospheric radiation balance.{{cite web |url=https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/HeatBucket/heatbucket.php |title=Earth's Big Heat Bucket |publisher=NASA Earth Observatory |author=Michon Scott |date=2006-04-24}}

The top few meters of Earth's oceans harbor more thermal energy than its entire atmosphere.{{cite web |url=https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ocean-heat/ |title=Vital Signs of the Plant: Ocean Heat Content |publisher=NASA |accessdate=2021-11-15}} Like atmospheric gases, fluidic ocean waters transport vast amounts of such energy over the planet's surface. Sensible heat also moves into and out of great depths under conditions that favor downwelling or upwelling.{{cite web |url=https://www.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/education-careers/education-program/k-12-teachers/project-atmosphere/training-opportunities/project-atmosphere-peer-led-training/project-atmosphere-peer-training-resources/air-sea/ |title=Air-Sea interaction: Teacher's guide |publisher=American Meteorological Society |year=2012 |access-date=2021-11-15}}{{cite web|url=http://oceanmotion.org/html/background/upwelling-and-downwelling.htm|title=Ocean Motion : Definition : Wind Driven Surface Currents - Upwelling and Downwelling|access-date=2021-11-15}}

Over 90 percent of the extra energy that has accumulated on Earth from ongoing global warming since 1970 has been stored in the ocean. About one-third has propagated to depths below 700 meters. The overall rate of growth has also risen during recent decades, reaching close to 500 TW (1 W/m²) as of 2020. That led to about 14 zettajoules (ZJ) of heat gain for the year, exceeding the 570 exajoules (=160,000 TW-hr{{Cite journal |url=https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy?country=~OWID_WRL |title=Global Direct Primary Energy Consumption |author1=Hannah Ritchie |author1-link=Hannah Ritchie |author2=Max Roser |author2-link=Max Roser |journal=Our World in Data |publisher=Published online at OurWorldInData.org. |year=2020 |access-date=2020-02-09}}) of total primary energy consumed by humans by a factor of at least 20.

Generally speaking, changes to Earth's energy flux balance can be thought of as being the result of external forcings (both natural and anthropogenic, radiative and non-radiative), system feedbacks, and internal system variability.{{cite book |title=Radiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing Uncertainties |author=National Research Council |publisher=The National Academic Press |year=2005 |doi=10.17226/11175|isbn=978-0-309-09506-8 }} Such changes are primarily expressed as observable shifts in temperature (T), clouds (C), water vapor (W), aerosols (A), trace greenhouse gases (G), land/ocean/ice surface reflectance (S), and as minor shifts in insolaton (I) among other possible factors. Earth's heating/cooling rate can then be analyzed over selected timeframes (Δt) as the net change in energy (ΔE) associated with these attributes:

:$$

\begin{align}

\Delta E / \Delta t &= ( \ \Delta E_T + \Delta E_C + \Delta E_W + \Delta E_A + \Delta E_G + \Delta E_S + \Delta E_I +... \ ) / \Delta t \\

\\

&= ASR - OLR.

\end{align}

Here the term ΔE_T, corresponding to the Planck response, is negative-valued when temperature rises due to its strong direct influence on OLR.

The recent increase in trace greenhouse gases produces an enhanced greenhouse effect, and thus a positive ΔE_G forcing term. By contrast, a large volcanic eruption (e.g. Mount Pinatubo 1991, El Chichón 1982) can inject sulfur-containing compounds into the upper atmosphere. High concentrations of stratospheric sulfur aerosols may persist for up to a few years, yielding a negative forcing contribution to ΔE_A. Various other types of anthropogenic aerosol emissions make both positive and negative contributions to ΔE_A. Solar cycles produce ΔE_I smaller in magnitude than those of recent ΔE_G trends from human activity.{{cite web |url=https://climate.nasa.gov/blog/2910/what-is-the-suns-role-in-climate-change/ |title=What Is the Sun's Role in Climate Change? |publisher=NASA |date=2019-09-06}}

Climate forcings are complex since they can produce direct and indirect feedbacks that intensify (positive feedback) or weaken (negative feedback) the original forcing. These often follow the temperature response. Water vapor trends as a positive feedback with respect to temperature changes due to evaporation shifts and the Clausius-Clapeyron relation. An increase in water vapor results in positive ΔE_W due to further enhancement of the greenhouse effect. A slower positive feedback is the ice-albedo feedback. For example, the loss of Arctic ice due to rising temperatures makes the region less reflective, leading to greater absorption of energy and even faster ice melt rates, thus positive influence on ΔE_S. Collectively, feedbacks tend to amplify global warming or cooling.Arias, P.A., N. Bellouin, E. Coppola, R.G. Jones, G. Krinner, J. Marotzke, V. Naik, M.D. Palmer, G.-K. Plattner, J. Rogelj, M. Rojas, J. Sillmann, T. Storelvmo, P.W. Thorne, B. Trewin, K. Achuta Rao, B. Adhikary, R.P. Allan, K. Armour, G. Bala, R. Barimalala, S. Berger, J.G. Canadell, C. Cassou, A. Cherchi, W. Collins, W.D. Collins, S.L. Connors, S. Corti, F. Cruz, F.J. Dentener, C. Dereczynski, A. Di Luca, A. Diongue Niang, F.J. Doblas-Reyes, A. Dosio, H. Douville, F. Engelbrecht, V.  Eyring, E. Fischer, P. Forster, B. Fox-Kemper, J.S. Fuglestvedt, J.C. Fyfe, et al. 2021: [https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_TS.pdf Technical Summary]. In [https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 33−144. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.002.{{rp|94}}

Clouds are responsible for about half of Earth's albedo and are powerful expressions of internal variability of the climate system. They may also act as feedbacks to forcings, and could be forcings themselves if for example a result of cloud seeding activity. Contributions to ΔE_C vary regionally and depending upon cloud type. Measurements from satellites are gathered in concert with simulations from models in an effort to improve understanding and reduce uncertainty.{{cite web |url=https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/44250/clouds-and-global-warming |title=Clouds and Global Warming |publisher=NASA Earth Observatory |date=2010-06-10}}

File:The-NASA-Earth's-Energy-Budget-Poster-Radiant-Energy-System-satellite-infrared-radiation-fluxes.jpg and can be measured by satellites. The Earth's energy imbalance is the "net absorbed" energy amount and grew from +0.6 W/m² (2009 est.) to above +1.0 W/m² in 2019.]]{{See also|Radiative forcing}}

The Earth's energy imbalance (EEI) is defined as "the persistent and positive (downward) net top of atmosphere energy flux associated with greenhouse gas forcing of the climate system".{{rp|2227}}

If Earth's incoming energy flux (ASR) is larger or smaller than the outgoing energy flux (OLR), then the planet will gain (warm) or lose (cool) net heat energy in accordance with the law of energy conservation:

: $EEI\; \backslash equiv\; ASR\; -\; OLR$.

Positive EEI thus defines the overall rate of planetary heating and is typically expressed as watts per square meter (W/m²). During 2005 to 2019 the Earth's energy imbalance averaged about 460 TW or globally 0.90 ± 0.15 W per m².

When Earth's energy imbalance (EEI) shifts by a sufficiently large amount, the shift is measurable by orbiting satellite-based instruments. Imbalances that fail to reverse over time will also drive long-term temperature changes in the atmospheric, oceanic, land, and ice components of the climate system. Temperature, sea level, ice mass and related shifts thus also provide measures of EEI.

The biggest changes in EEI arise from changes in the composition of the atmosphere through human activities, thereby interfering with the natural flow of energy through the climate system. The main changes are from increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, that produce heating (positive EEI), and pollution. The latter refers to atmospheric aerosols of various kinds, some of which absorb energy while others reflect energy and produce cooling (or lower EEI).  

It is not (yet) possible to measure the absolute magnitude of EEI directly at top of atmosphere, although changes over time as observed by satellite-based instruments are thought to be accurate. The only practical way to estimate the absolute magnitude of EEI is through an inventory of the changes in energy in the climate system. The biggest of these energy reservoirs is the ocean.

The planetary heat content that resides in the climate system can be compiled given the heat capacity, density and temperature distributions of each of its components. Most regions are now reasonably well sampled and monitored, with the most significant exception being the deep ocean.{{cite web |url=https://argo.ucsd.edu/expansion/deep-argo-mission/ |title=Deep Argo Mission |publisher=Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego |access-date=26 November 2023}}

File:Schematic presentation on the Earth heat inventory for the current anthropogenically driven positive Earth energy imbalance (EEI) at the top of the atmosphere (TOA).png

Estimates of the absolute magnitude of EEI have likewise been calculated using the measured temperature changes during recent multi-decadal time intervals. For the 2006 to 2020 period EEI was about {{val|+0.76|0.2|u=W/m2}} and showed a significant increase above the mean of {{val|+0.48|0.1|u=W/m2}} for the 1971 to 2020 period.

EEI has been positive because temperatures have increased almost everywhere for over 50 years. Global surface temperature (GST) is calculated by averaging temperatures measured at the surface of the sea along with air temperatures measured over land. Reliable data extending to at least 1880 shows that GST has undergone a steady increase of about 0.18 °C per decade since about year 1970.{{cite web |title=Global Annual Mean Surface Air Temperature Change |url=https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v4/ |publisher=NASA |access-date=23 February 2020}}

Ocean waters are especially effective absorbents of solar energy and have a far greater total heat capacity than the atmosphere.{{cite web |url=https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-ocean-heat-content |title=Climate Change: Ocean Heat Content |author=LuAnn Dahlman and Rebecca Lindsey |publisher=NOAA |date=2020-08-17}} Research vessels and stations have sampled sea temperatures at depth and around the globe since before 1960. Additionally, after the year 2000, an expanding network of nearly 4000 Argo robotic floats has measured the temperature anomaly, or equivalently the ocean heat content change (ΔOHC). Since at least 1990, OHC has increased at a steady or accelerating rate. ΔOHC represents the largest portion of EEI since oceans have thus far taken up over 90% of the net excess energy entering the system over time (Δt):

: $EEI\; \backslash gtrsim\; \backslash Delta\; OHC\; /\; \backslash Delta\; t$.

Earth's outer crust and thick ice-covered regions have taken up relatively little of the excess energy. This is because excess heat at their surfaces flows inward only by means of thermal conduction, and thus penetrates only several tens of centimeters on the daily cycle and only several tens of meters on the annual cycle.Lowrie, W. (2007). Fundamentals of geophysics. Cambridge: CUP, 2nd ed. Much of the heat uptake goes either into melting ice and permafrost or into evaporating more water from soils.

Several satellites measure the energy absorbed and radiated by Earth, and thus by inference the energy imbalance. These are located top of atmosphere (TOA) and provide data covering the globe. The NASA Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) project involved three such satellites: the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite (ERBS), launched October 1984; NOAA-9, launched December 1984; and NOAA-10, launched September 1986.

File:Earth's heating rate since 2005.jpg measurements (2005–2019). A rate of +1.0 W/m² summed over the planet's surface equates to a continuous heat uptake of about 500 terawatts (~0.3% of the incident solar radiation).]]

NASA's Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instruments are part of its Earth Observing System (EOS) since March 2000. CERES is designed to measure both solar-reflected (short wavelength) and Earth-emitted (long wavelength) radiation. The CERES data showed increases in EEI from {{val|+0.42|0.48|u=W/m2}} in 2005 to {{val|+1.12|0.48|u=W/m2}} in 2019. Contributing factors included more water vapor, less clouds, increasing greenhouse gases, and declining ice that were partially offset by rising temperatures.{{cite web |url=https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/earthmatters/2021/06/22/earths-radiation-budget-is-out-of-balance/ |title=Earth Matters: Earth's Radiation Budget is Out of Balance |author=Joseph Atkinson |publisher=NASA Earth Observatory |date=22 June 2021}} Subsequent investigation of the behavior using the GFDL CM4/AM4 climate model concluded there was a less than 1% chance that internal climate variability alone caused the trend.

Other researchers have used data from CERES, AIRS, CloudSat, and other EOS instruments to look for trends of radiative forcing embedded within the EEI data. Their analysis showed a forcing rise of {{val|+0.53|0.11|u=W/m2}} from years 2003 to 2018. About 80% of the increase was associated with the rising concentration of greenhouse gases which reduced the outgoing longwave radiation.{{cite web |url=https://news.umbc.edu/umbcs-ryan-kramer-confirms-human-caused-climate-change-with-direct-evidence-for-first-time/ |title=UMBC's Ryan Kramer confirms human-caused climate change with direct evidence for first time |publisher=University of Maryland, Baltimore County |date=12 April 2021 |author=Sarah Hansen}}{{cite web |url=https://phys.org/news/2021-03-humans-earth-energy.html |title=Direct observations confirm that humans are throwing Earth's energy budget off balance |website=phys.org |date=26 March 2021}}

Further satellite measurements including TRMM and CALIPSO data have indicated additional precipitation, which is sustained by increased energy leaving the surface through evaporation (the latent heat flux), offsetting some of the increase in the longwave greenhouse flux to the surface.

It is noteworthy that radiometric calibration uncertainties limit the capability of the current generation of satellite-based instruments, which are otherwise stable and precise. As a result, relative changes in EEI are quantifiable with an accuracy which is not also achievable for any single measurement of the absolute imbalance.

{{See also|Geodesy}}

File:Earth heating from space geodesy 2002-2016.png.]]

Observations since 1994 show that ice has retreated from every part of Earth at an accelerating rate. Mean global sea level has likewise risen as a consequence of the ice melt in combination with the overall rise in ocean temperatures.{{cite journal |author=WCRP Global Sea Level Budget Group |year=2018 |title=Global sea-level budget 1993–present |journal=Earth System Science Data |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=1551–1590 |bibcode=2018ESSD...10.1551W |doi=10.5194/essd-10-1551-2018 |doi-access=free}}

These shifts have contributed measurable changes to the geometric shape and gravity of the planet.

Changes to the mass distribution of water within the hydrosphere and cryosphere have been deduced using gravimetric observations by the GRACE satellite instruments. These data have been compared against ocean surface topography and further hydrographic observations using computational models that account for thermal expansion, salinity changes, and other factors. Estimates thereby obtained for ΔOHC and EEI have agreed with the other (mostly) independent assessments within uncertainties.{{cite journal |last1=Marti |first1=Florence |last2=Blazquez |first2=Alejandro |last3=Meyssignac |first3=Benoit |last4=Ablain |first4=Michaël |last5=Barnoud |first5=Anne |last6=Fraudeau |first6=Robin |last7=Jugier |first7=Rémi |last8=Chenal |first8=Jonathan |last9=Larnicol |first9=Gilles |last10=Pfeffer |first10=Julia |last11=Restano |first11=Marco |last12=Benveniste |first12=Jérôme |display-authors=5 |title=Monitoring the ocean heat content change and the Earth energy imbalance from space altimetry and space gravimetry |journal=Earth System Science Data |year=2021 |doi=10.5194/essd-2021-220 |doi-access=free}}{{cite journal |last1=Hakuba |first1=M.Z. |last2=Frederikse |first2=T. |last3=Landerer |first3=F.W. |title=Earth's Energy Imbalance From the Ocean Perspective (2005–2019) |journal=Geophysical Research Letters |volume=48 |issue=16 |date=28 August 2021 |doi=10.1029/2021GL093624 |doi-access=free}}

Climate scientists Kevin Trenberth, James Hansen, and colleagues have identified the monitoring of Earth's energy imbalance as an important metric to help policymakers guide the pace for mitigation and adaptation measures. Because of climate system inertia, longer-term EEI (Earth's energy imbalance) trends can forecast further changes that are "in the pipeline".

Scientists found that the EEI is the most important metric related to climate change. It is the net result of all the processes and feedbacks in play in the climate system.{{Cite journal |last1=Trenberth |first1=Kevin E |last2=Cheng |first2=Lijing |date=2022-09-01 |title=A perspective on climate change from Earth's energy imbalance |journal=Environmental Research: Climate |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=013001 |doi=10.1088/2752-5295/ac6f74 |issn=2752-5295 |doi-access=free}} 50px Text was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License] Knowing how much extra energy affects weather systems and rainfall is vital to understand the increasing weather extremes.

In 2012, NASA scientists reported that to stop global warming atmospheric CO₂ concentration would have to be reduced to 350 ppm or less, assuming all other climate forcings were fixed. As of 2020, atmospheric CO₂ reached 415 ppm and all long-lived greenhouse gases exceeded a 500 ppm {{CO2}}-equivalent concentration due to continued growth in human emissions.{{cite web |url=https://gml.noaa.gov/aggi/ |title=NOAA's Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (An Introduction) |publisher=NOAA |access-date=2021-08-04}}

• Lorenz energy cycle
• Planetary equilibrium temperature
• Climate sensitivity
• Tipping points in the climate system
• {{Portal-inline|Climate change}}

{{reflist|refs=

{{Cite journal |last1=Stephens |first1=Graeme L. |last2=Li |first2=Juilin |last3=Wild |first3=Martin |last4=Clayson |first4=Carol Anne |author4-link=Carol Anne Clayson|last5=Loeb |first5=Norman |last6=Kato |first6=Seiji |last7=L'Ecuyer |first7=Tristan |last8=Stackhouse |first8=Paul W. |last9=Lebsock |first9=Matthew |name-list-style=amp |display-authors=4 |date=2012 |title=An update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations |journal=Nature Geoscience |language=en |volume=5 |issue=10 |pages=691–696 |bibcode=2012NatGe...5..691S |doi=10.1038/ngeo1580 |issn=1752-0894}}

{{Cite journal |last=Previdi |first=M |display-authors=etal |year=2013 |title=Climate sensitivity in the Anthropocene |journal= Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society|volume=139 |issue=674 |pages=1121–1131 |bibcode=2013QJRMS.139.1121P |citeseerx=10.1.1.434.854 |doi=10.1002/qj.2165|s2cid=17224800 }}

{{Cite journal |last1=Davies |first1=J. H. |last2=Davies |first2=D. R. |date=2010-02-22 |title=Earth's surface heat flux |journal=Solid Earth |language=en |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=5–24 |doi=10.5194/se-1-5-2010 |bibcode=2010SolE....1....5D |issn=1869-9529|doi-access=free }}Davies, J. H., & Davies, D. R. (2010). Earth's surface heat flux. Solid Earth, 1(1), 5–24.

{{Cite journal |last1=Wild |first1=Martin |last2=Folini |first2=Doris |last3=Schär |first3=Christoph |last4=Loeb |first4=Norman |last5=Dutton |first5=Ellsworth G. |last6=König-Langlo |first6=Gert |date=2013 |title=The global energy balance from a surface perspective |journal=Climate Dynamics |language=en |volume=40 |issue=11–12 |pages=3107–3134 |doi=10.1007/s00382-012-1569-8 |bibcode=2013ClDy...40.3107W |hdl=20.500.11850/58556 |s2cid=129294935 |issn=0930-7575|url=http://doc.rero.ch/record/321020/files/382_2012_Article_1569.pdf |hdl-access=free }}

{{Cite journal |last1=Wielicki |first1=Bruce A. |last2=Harrison |first2=Edwin F. |last3=Cess |first3=Robert D. |last4=King |first4=Michael D. |last5=Randall |first5=David A. |display-authors=etal |year=1995 |title=Mission to Planet Earth: Role of Clouds and Radiation in Climate |journal=Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society |language=en |volume=76 |issue=11 |pages=2125–2153 |bibcode=1995BAMS...76.2125W |doi= 10.1175/1520-0477(1995)076<2125:mtpero>2.0.co;2|issn=0003-0007|doi-access=free }}

{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R91t_pCwA_0C&q=Environmental+Biology+and+Toxicology+sharma&pg=PR3 |title=Environmental Biology & Toxicology |last=Sharma |first=P.D. |publisher=Rastogi Publications |year=2008 |isbn=9788171337422 |edition=2nd |pages=14–15 |language=en}}

{{Cite web |url=http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/energy_budget/ |title=The NASA Earth's Energy Budget Poster |publisher=NASA |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140421050855/http://science-edu.larc.nasa.gov/energy_budget/ |archive-date=21 April 2014 |url-status=dead |access-date=20 April 2014}}

{{Cite web |url=https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/EnergyBalance |title=Climate and Earth's Energy Budget |date=2009-01-14 |website=earthobservatory.nasa.gov |language=en |access-date=2019-08-05}}

{{Cite book |url=https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Global+Warming%3A+Understanding+the+Forecast%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9780470943410 |title=Global Warming: Understanding the Forecast, 2nd Edition |last=Archer |first=David |year=2012 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0-470-94341-0 |edition=2nd |language=en-us}}

{{Cite web |url=https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Earth%27s_energy_flow |title=Earth's energy flow - Energy Education |website=energyeducation.ca |access-date=2019-08-05}}

{{Cite journal |last=Fleming |first=James R. |date=1999 |title=Joseph Fourier, the 'greenhouse effect', and the quest for a universal theory of terrestrial temperatures |journal=Endeavour |language=en |volume=23 |issue=2 |pages=72–75 |doi=10.1016/S0160-9327(99)01210-7}}

{{Cite web |url=http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_16/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120204041743/http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_16/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-02-04 |title=Earth's Energy Imbalance |last1=Hansen |first1=James |last2=Sato |first2=Makiko |date=January 2012 |publisher=NASA |last3=Kharecha |first3=Pushker |last4=von Schuckmann |first4=Karina}}

{{Cite web |url=https://icp.giss.nasa.gov/education/radforce/ |title=GISS ICP: Effect of the Sun's Energy on the Ocean and Atmosphere |website=icp.giss.nasa.gov |access-date=2019-08-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190707140846/https://icp.giss.nasa.gov/education/radforce/ |archive-date=7 July 2019 |url-status=dead }}

{{Cite web |url=https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/EnergyBalance/page7.php |title=Climate and Earth's Energy Budget (Part 7-Climate Forcings and Global Warming) |last=Lindsey |first=Rebecca |date=2009-01-14 |website=earthobservatory.nasa.gov |language=en |access-date=2019-08-05| publisher=Earth Observatory, part of the EOS Project Science Office, located at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center}}

{{cite journal |url=https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014RG000449 |title=The albedo of Earth |last1=Stephens |first1=Graeme L. |last2=O'Brien |first2=Denis |last3=Webster |first3=Peter J. |last4=Pilewski |first4=Peter |last5=Kato |first5=Seiji |last6=Li |first6=Jui-lin |journal=Reviews of Geophysics |doi=10.1002/2014RG000449 |date=2015-01-25 |pages=141–163 |volume=53 |issue=1 |bibcode=2015RvGeo..53..141S |s2cid=12536954 |access-date=2021-05-24 |archive-date=2021-05-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210524165822/https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014RG000449 |url-status=live }}

{{cite journal |url=https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2021AV000440 |title=Earth's albedo and its symmetry |last1=Datseris |first1=George |last2=Stevens |first2=Bjorn |journal=AGU Advances |doi=10.1029/2021AV000440 |date=2021-08-11 |pages=1–13 |volume=2 |issue=3 |bibcode=2021AGUA....200440D |s2cid=238722349 |access-date=2021-12-07 }}

{{cite journal |last1=Thorsen |first1=Tyler J. |last2=Kato |first2=Seiji |last3=Loeb |first3=Norman G. |last4=Rose |first4=Fred G. |title=Observation-Based Decomposition of Radiative Perturbations and Radiative Kernels |journal=Journal of Climate |date=15 December 2018 |volume=31 |issue=24 |pages=10039–10058 |doi=10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0045.1 |pmid=35095187 |pmc=8793621 |bibcode=2018JCli...3110039T |issn=0894-8755 |doi-access=free }}

{{cite journal |last1=Loeb |first1=Norman G. |last2=Johnson |first2=Gregory C. |last3=Thorsen |first3=Tyler J. |last4=Lyman |first4=John M. |last5=Rose |first5=Fred G. |last6=Kato |first6=Seiji |display-authors=4 |title=Satellite and Ocean Data Reveal Marked Increase in Earth's Heating Rate |journal=Geophysical Research Letters |date=15 June 2021 |volume=48 |issue=13 |doi=10.1029/2021GL093047 |bibcode=2021GeoRL..4893047L |doi-access=free }}

{{cite journal |last1=von Schuckman |first1=K. |last2=Palmer |first2=M. D. |last3=Trenberth |first3=K. E. |last4=Cazenave |first4=A. |author-link=Anny Cazenave |last5=Chambers |first5=D. |last6=Champollion |first6=N. |last7=Hansen |first7=J. |last8=Josey |first8=S. A. |last9=Loeb |first9=N |last10=Mathieu |first10=P. P. |last11=Meyssignac |first11=B. |last12=Wild |first12=N. |display-authors=4 |title=An imperative to monitor Earth's energy imbalance |journal=Nature Climate Change |date=27 January 2016 |doi=10.1038/NCLIMATE2876 |doi-access=free |volume=6 |issue=2 |pages=138–144 |bibcode=2016NatCC...6..138V }}

{{cite journal |last1=von Schuckmann |first1=Karina |last2=Minière |first2=Audrey. |last3=Gues |first3=Flora |last4=Cuesta-Valero |first4=Francisco José |last5=Kirchengast |first5=Gottfried |last6=Adusumilli |first6=Susheel |last7=Straneo |first7=Flammetta |last8=Ablain |first8=Michaël |last9=Allen |first9=Richard P. |last10=Barker |first10=Paul M. |display-authors=7 |title=Heat stored in the Earth system 1960-2020: where does the energy go? |journal=Earth System Science Data |date=17 April 2023 |doi=10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023 |doi-access=free |url=https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/15/1675/2023/essd-15-1675-2023.html |volume=15 |issue=4 |page=1675-1709 50px Material was copied from this source, which is available under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License]}}

{{cite journal |last1=Murphy |first1=D. M. |last2=Solomon |first2=S. |last3=Portmann |first3=R. W. |last4=Rosenlof |first4=K. H. |last5=Forster |first5=P. M. |last6=Wong |first6=T. |display-authors=4 |title=An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950 |journal=Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres |date=9 September 2009 |volume=114 |issue=D17 |doi=10.1029/2009JD012105 |bibcode=2009JGRD..11417107M |doi-access=free }}

{{cite journal |last1=Raghuraman |first1=S. P. |last2=Paynter |first2=D. |last3=Ramaswamy |first3=V. |title=Anthropogenic forcing and response yield observed positive trend in Earth's energy imbalance |journal=Nature Communications |date=28 July 2021 |doi=10.1038/s41467-021-24544-4 |volume=12 |issue=4577|page=4577 |pmid=34321469 |pmc=8319337 |bibcode=2021NatCo..12.4577R }}

{{cite journal |last1=Allan |first1=Richard P. |last2=Liu |first2=Chunlei |last3=Loeb |first3=Norman G. |last4=Palmer |first4=Matthew D. |last5=Roberts |first5=Malcolm |last6=Smith |first6=Doug |last7=Vidale |first7=Pier-Luigi |display-authors=4 |title=Changes in global net radiative imbalance 1985–2012 |journal=Geophysical Research Letters |date=18 July 2014 |volume=41 |issue=15 |pages=5588–5597 |doi=10.1002/2014GL060962 |pmid=25821270 |pmc=4373161 |bibcode=2014GeoRL..41.5588A |doi-access=free }}

{{cite journal |url=https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091585 |title=Observational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative Forcing |last1=Kramer |first1=Ryan J. |last2=He |first2=Haozhe |last3=Soden |first3=Brian J. |last4=Oreopoulos |first4=Lazaros |last5=Myhre |first5=Gunnar |last6=Forster |first6=Piers M. |last7=Smith |first7=Christopher J. |display-authors=4 |journal=Geophysical Research Letters |volume=48 |issue=7 |date=2021-03-25 |doi=10.1029/2020GL091585 |bibcode=2021GeoRL..4891585K |s2cid=233684244 }}

{{cite journal |last1=Loeb |first1=Norman G. |last2=Lyman |first2=John M. |last3=Johnson |first3=Gregory C. |last4=Allan |first4=Richard P. |last5=Doelling |first5=David R. |last6=Wong |first6=Takmeng |last7=Soden |first7=Brian J. |last8=Stephens |first8=Graeme L. |display-authors=4 |title=Observed changes in top-of-the-atmosphere radiation and upper-ocean heating consistent within uncertainty |journal=Nature Geoscience |date=22 January 2012 |volume=5 |issue=2 |pages=110–113 |doi=10.1038/ngeo1375 |bibcode=2012NatGe...5..110L }}

{{cite journal |last1=Loeb |first1=Norman G. |last2=Doelling |first2=David R. |last3=Hailan |first3=Wang |last4=Su |first4=Wenling |last5=Nguyen |first5=Cathy |last6=Corbett |first6=Joseph G. |last7=Liang |first7=Lusheng |last8=Mitrescu |first8=Cristian |last9=Rose |first9=Fred G. |last10=Keto |first10=Seiji |display-authors=4 |title=Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product |journal=Journal of Climate |date=15 January 2018 |volume=31 |issue=2 |pages=895–918 |doi=10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0208.1 |bibcode=2018JCli...31..895L |doi-access=free }}

{{Cite journal |last1=Cheng |first1=Lijing |last2=Foster |first2=Grant |last3=Hausfather |first3=Zeke |last4=Trenberth |first4=Kevin E. |last5=Abraham |first5=John |date=2022 |title=Improved Quantification of the Rate of Ocean Warming |journal=Journal of Climate |volume=35 |issue=14 |pages=4827–4840 |doi=10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0895.1 |bibcode=2022JCli...35.4827C |doi-access=free}}

{{cite journal |title = A review of global ocean temperature observations: Implications for ocean heat content estimates and climate change |url=https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rog.20022 |year = 2013 |last1=Abraham |first1=J. P. |last2=Baringer |first2=M. |last3=Bindoff |first3=N. L. |last4=Boyer |first4=T. |last5=Cheng |first5=L. J. |last6=Church |first6=J. A. |display-authors=4 |volume=51 |issue = 3 |journal=Reviews of Geophysics |pages=450–483 |doi= 10.1002/rog.20022 |bibcode = 2013RvGeo..51..450A |hdl=11336/25416 |citeseerx = 10.1.1.594.3698 |s2cid=53350907 }}

{{cite journal |last1=Slater |first1=Thomas |last2=Lawrence |first2=Isobel R. |last3=Otosaka |first3=Inès N. |last4=Shepherd |first4=Andrew |last5=Gourmelen |first5=Noel |last6=Jakob |first6=Livia |last7=Tepes |first7=Paul |last8=Gilbert |first8=Lin |last9=Nienow |first9=Peter |display-authors=4 |title=Review article: Earth's ice imbalance |journal=The Cryosphere |date=25 January 2021 |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=233–246 |doi=10.5194/tc-15-233-2021 |bibcode=2021TCry...15..233S |s2cid=234098716 |url=https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/233/2021/ |language=English |issn=1994-0416|doi-access=free }}

{{cite journal |title = Earth's energy imbalance and implications |url=https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/11/13421/2011/ |date=22 December 2011 |last1=Hansen |first1=J. |last2=Sato |first2=M. |last3=Kharecha |first3=P. |last4=von Schuckmann |first4=K. |volume=11 |issue=24 |journal=Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |pages=13421–13449 |doi= 10.5194/acp-11-13421-2011 |arxiv=1105.1140 |bibcode=2011ACP....1113421H |s2cid=16937940 |doi-access=free }}

{{cite journal |title = An imperative for climate change planning: tracking Earth's global energy |url=https://courses.seas.harvard.edu/climate/seminars/pdfs/Trenberth2009_TrackingGlobalEnergy.pdf |date=1 October 2009 |last1=Trenberth |first1=Kevin E. |volume=1 |issue=1 |journal=Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability |pages=19–27 |doi= 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.06.001 |bibcode=2009COES....1...19T }}

{{cite journal |title=Insights into Earth's Energy Imbalance from Multiple Sources|first1=Kevin E.|last1=Trenberth|first2=John T.|last2=Fasullo|last3=von Shuckmann|first3=Karina|last4=Cheng|first4=LiJing|journal=Journal of Climate|date=2016|volume=29|issue=20|pages=7495–7505|doi=10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0339.1|bibcode=2016JCli...29.7495T|osti=1537015|s2cid=51994089 |url=https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1537015}}

{{cite journal |last1=Robock |first1=Alan |title=Volcanic eruptions and climate |journal=Reviews of Geophysics |date=2000-05-01 |volume=38 |issue=2 |pages=191–219 |doi=10.1029/1998RG000054 |bibcode=2000RvGeo..38..191R |s2cid=1299888 |doi-access=free }}

{{cite journal |title=What influence will future solar activity changes over the 21st century have on projected global near-surface temperature changes? |author=Gareth S. Jones, Mike Lockwood, Peter A. Stott |journal= Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres|date=2012-03-16 |volume=117 |issue=D5 |pages=n/a |doi=10.1029/2011JD017013 |bibcode=2012JGRD..117.5103J |doi-access=free }}

}}

{{Commons category|Earth's energy budget}}

• [http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/EnergyBalance/page6.php NASA: The Atmosphere's Energy Budget]
• [http://ceres.larc.nasa.gov/ Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES)]
• [http://gewex-srb.larc.nasa.gov/ NASA/GEWEX Surface Radiation Budget (SRB) Project]

{{Earth |state=collapsed |expanded=collapsed}}

{{Climate change}}

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Earth's Energy Budget}}

Category:Atmospheric sciences

Category:Climate forcing

Category:Climate variability and change

Category:Climatology

Category:Earth

Category:Earth sciences

Category:Energy

Category:Environmental science

Category:Oceanography

Category:Articles containing video clips