Eight-vertex model
{{short description|Generalization of the ice-type (six-vertex) models}}
In statistical mechanics, the eight-vertex model is a generalization of the ice-type (six-vertex) models. It was discussed by T. Bill Sutherland{{cite journal | last=Sutherland | first=Bill | title=Two‐Dimensional Hydrogen Bonded Crystals without the Ice Rule | journal=Journal of Mathematical Physics | publisher=AIP Publishing | volume=11 | issue=11 | year=1970 | issn=0022-2488 | doi=10.1063/1.1665111 | pages=3183–3186| bibcode=1970JMP....11.3183S }} and C. Fan & F. Y. Wu,{{cite journal | last1=Fan | first1=Chungpeng | last2=Wu | first2=F. Y. | title=General Lattice Model of Phase Transitions | journal=Physical Review B | publisher=American Physical Society (APS) | volume=2 | issue=3 | date=1970-08-01 | issn=0556-2805 | doi=10.1103/physrevb.2.723 | pages=723–733| bibcode=1970PhRvB...2..723F }} and solved by Rodney Baxter in the zero-field case.{{cite journal | last=Baxter | first=R. J. | title=Eight-Vertex Model in Lattice Statistics | journal=Physical Review Letters | publisher=American Physical Society (APS) | volume=26 | issue=14 | date=1971-04-05 | issn=0031-9007 | doi=10.1103/physrevlett.26.832 | pages=832–833| bibcode=1971PhRvL..26..832B }}
Description
As with the ice-type models, the eight-vertex model is a square lattice model, where each state is a configuration of arrows at a vertex. The allowed vertices have an even number of arrows pointing towards the vertex; these include the six inherited from the ice-type model (1-6), sinks (7), and sources (8).
We consider a lattice, with vertices and edges. Imposing periodic boundary conditions requires that the states 7 and 8 occur equally often, as do states 5 and 6, and thus can be taken to have the same energy. For the zero-field case the same is true for the two other pairs of states. Each vertex has an associated energy and Boltzmann weight
:
w_j=\exp\left(-\frac{\epsilon_j}{k_\mathrm{B}T}\right)
giving the partition function over the lattice as
:
Z=\sum \exp\left(-\frac{\sum_j n_j\epsilon_j}{k_\mathrm{B}T}\right)
where the outer summation is over all allowed configurations of vertices in the lattice. In this general form the partition function remains unsolved.
Solution in the zero-field case
The zero-field case of the model corresponds physically to the absence of external electric fields. Hence, the model remains unchanged under the reversal of all arrows. The states 1 and 2, and 3 and 4, consequently must occur as pairs. The vertices may be assigned arbitrary weights
:
\begin{align}
w_1=w_2&=a\\
w_3=w_4&=b\\
w_5=w_6&=c\\
w_7=w_8&=d.
\end{align}
The solution is based on the observation that rows in transfer matrices commute, for a certain parametrization of these four Boltzmann weights. This came about as a modification of an alternate solution for the six-vertex model which makes use of elliptic theta functions.
=Commuting transfer matrices=
The proof relies on the fact that when and , for quantities
:
\begin{align}
\Delta&=\frac{a^2+b^2-c^2-d^2}{2(ab+cd)}\\
\Gamma&=\frac{ab-cd}{ab+cd}
\end{align}
the transfer matrices and (associated with the weights , , , and , , , ) commute. Using the star-triangle relation, Baxter reformulated this condition as equivalent to a parametrization of the weights given as
:
a:b:c:d=\operatorname{snh}(\eta-u):\operatorname{snh} (\eta +u):\operatorname{snh} (2\eta): k\operatorname{snh} (2\eta)\operatorname{snh} (\eta-u)\operatorname{snh} (\eta+u)
for fixed modulus and and variable . Here snh is the hyperbolic analogue of sn, given by
:
\begin{align}
\operatorname {snh} (u) &=-i\operatorname {sn} (iu) = i\operatorname {sn} (-iu) \\
\text{where } \operatorname {sn} (u)&= \frac{H(u)}{\sqrt{k} \Theta(u)}
\end{align}
and and are theta functions of modulus . The associated transfer matrix thus is a function of alone; for all ,
:
T(u)T(v)=T(v)T(u).
=The matrix function <math>Q(u)</math>=
The other crucial part of the solution is the existence of a nonsingular matrix-valued function , such that for all complex the matrices commute with each other and the transfer matrices, and satisfy
{{NumBlk|:||{{EquationRef|1}}}}
where
:
\begin{align}
\zeta(u)&=[c^{-1}H(2\eta)\Theta(u-\eta)\Theta(u+\eta)]^N\\
\phi(u)&=[\Theta(0)H(u)\Theta(u)]^N.
\end{align}
The existence and commutation relations of such a function are demonstrated by considering pair propagations through a vertex, and periodicity relations of the theta functions, in a similar way to the six-vertex model.
=Explicit solution=
The commutation of matrices in ({{EquationNote|1}}) allow them to be diagonalised, and thus eigenvalues can be found. The partition function is calculated from the maximal eigenvalue, resulting in a free energy per site of
:
\begin{align}
f=\epsilon_5-2kT\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\sinh^2((\tau-\lambda)n)(\cosh(n\lambda)-\cosh(n\alpha))}{n\sinh(2n\tau)\cosh(n\lambda)}
\end{align}
for
:
\begin{align}
\tau&=\frac{\pi K'}{2K}\\
\lambda&=\frac{\pi \eta}{iK}\\
\alpha&=\frac{\pi u}{iK}
\end{align}
where and are the complete elliptic integrals of moduli and .
The eight vertex model was also solved in quasicrystals.
Equivalence with an Ising model
There is a natural correspondence between the eight-vertex model, and the Ising model with 2-spin and 4-spin nearest neighbor interactions. The states of this model are spins on faces of a square lattice. The analogue of 'edges' in the eight-vertex model are products of spins on adjacent faces:
:
\begin{align}
\alpha_{ij}&=\sigma_{ij}\sigma_{i,j+1}\\
\mu_{ij}&=\sigma_{ij}\sigma_{i+1,j}.
\end{align}
The most general form of the energy for this model is
:
\begin{align}
\epsilon&=-\sum_{ij}(J_h\mu_{ij}+J_v\alpha_{ij}+J\alpha_{ij}\mu_{ij}+J'\alpha_{i+1,j}\mu_{ij}+J''\alpha_{ij}\alpha_{i+1,j})
\end{align}
where , , , describe the horizontal, vertical and two diagonal 2-spin interactions, and describes the 4-spin interaction between four faces at a vertex; the sum is over the whole lattice.
We denote horizontal and vertical spins (arrows on edges) in the eight-vertex model , respectively, and define up and right as positive directions. The restriction on vertex states is that the product of four edges at a vertex is 1; this automatically holds for Ising "edges." Each configuration then corresponds to a unique , configuration, whereas each , configuration gives two choices of configurations.
Equating general forms of Boltzmann weights for each vertex , the following relations between the and , , , , define the correspondence between the lattice models:
:
\begin{align}
\epsilon_1&=-J_h-J_v-J-J'-J,\quad \epsilon_2=J_h+J_v-J-J'-J\\
\epsilon_3&=-J_h+J_v+J+J'-J,\quad \epsilon_4=J_h-J_v+J+J'-J\\
\epsilon_5&=\epsilon_6=J-J'+J''\\
\epsilon_7&=\epsilon_8=-J+J'+J''.
\end{align}
It follows that in the zero-field case of the eight-vertex model, the horizontal and vertical interactions in the corresponding Ising model vanish.
These relations gives the equivalence between the partition functions of the eight-vertex model, and the (2,4)-spin Ising model. Consequently a solution in either model would lead immediately to a solution in the other.
See also
Notes
{{Reflist}}
References
- {{Citation | last1=Baxter | first1=Rodney J. | title=Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics | url=http://physics.anu.edu.au/theophys/_files/Exactly.pdf | publisher=Academic Press Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers] | location=London | isbn=978-0-12-083180-7 | mr=690578 | year=1982 | access-date=2012-08-12 | archive-date=2021-04-14 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414063635/https://physics.anu.edu.au/theophys/_files/Exactly.pdf | url-status=dead }}
Category:Exactly solvable models