Euphonia

{{Short description|Genus of birds}}

{{about|a genus of birds|the talking device|Euphonia (device)}}

{{distinguish|Euphony}}

{{Automatic taxobox

| name = Euphonia

| image = ViolaceousEuphonia2.jpg

| image_caption = Violaceous euphonia, Euphonia violacea

| taxon = Euphonia

| authority = Desmarest, 1806

| type_species =Euphonia olivacea{{cite web |url= https://www.aviansystematics.org/4th-edition-checklist?viewfamilies=196 |title= Fringillidae |author= |date= |website= aviansystematics.org |publisher= The Trust for Avian Systematics |access-date= 2023-07-16}} = Euphonia minuta

| type_species_authority = Desmarest, 1806

| subdivision_ranks = Species

| subdivision =

See text.

}}

Euphonias are members of the genus Euphonia, a group of Neotropical birds in the finch family. They and the chlorophonias comprise the subfamily Euphoniinae.

The genus name is of Greek origin and refers to the birds' pleasing song, meaning "sweet-voiced" ({{lang|grc|εὖ}} eu means "well" or "good" and {{lang|grc|φωνή}} phōnē means "sound", hence "of good sound").

Most male euphonias are dark metallic blue above and bright yellow below. Many have contrasting pale foreheads and white undertails. Some have light blue patches on the head and/or orangish underparts. Females much more plain, predominantly olive-green all over. They range in overall length from {{convert|9|to|11|cm|in|frac=2|abbr=on}}. They eat small fruit and berries, particularly mistletoe (Loranthaceae). Some species may also eat some insects.{{cite web| editor1-last=del Hoyo | editor1-first=J. | editor2-last=Elliott | editor2-first=A. | editor3-last=Sargatal | editor3-first=J. | editor4-last=Christie | editor4-first=D.A. | editor5-last=de Juana | editor5-first=E. | title=Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive | publisher=Lynx Edicions | url=http://www.hbw.com | accessdate=15 July 2015 }}{{subscription required}}

Euphonias were once considered members of the tanager family, Thraupidae.{{cite journal | last1=Banks | first1=Richard C. | last2=Cicero | first2=Carla | last3=Dunn | first3=Jon L. | last4=Kratter | first4=Andrew W. | last5=Rasmussen | first5=Pamela C. | last6=Remsen | first6=J.V. Jr. | last7=Rising | first7=James D. | last8=Stotz | first8=Douglas F. | year=2003 | title=Forty-fourth supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-List of North American Birds | journal=The Auk | volume=120 | issue=3 | pages=923–931 | url=http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1642/0004-8038%282003%29120%5B0923:FSTTAO%5D2.0.CO;2

| doi=10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0923:FSTTAO]2.0.CO;2 | url-access=subscription }} A molecular phylogenetic study of the finch family Fringillidae published in 2012 included 9 species from the genus Euphonia and a single species from the genus Chlorophonia, the blue-naped chlorophonia. The resulting cladogram showed the blue-naped chlorophonia nested within the Euphonia clade implying that the genus Euphonia is paraphyletic.{{cite journal | last1=Zuccon | first1=Dario | last2=Prŷs-Jones | first2=Robert | last3=Rasmussen | first3=Pamela C. | last4=Ericson | first4=Per G.P. | year=2012 | title=The phylogenetic relationships and generic limits of finches (Fringillidae) | journal=Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution | volume=62 | issue=2 | pages=581–596 | doi=10.1016/j.ympev.2011.10.002 | url=http://www.nrm.se/download/18.9ff3752132fdaeccb6800010935/Zuccon%20et%20al%202012.pdf | pmid=22023825| bibcode=2012MolPE..62..581Z }}

The genus was introduced in 1806 by the French zoologist Anselme Gaëtan Desmarest in his Histoire naturelle des tangaras, des manakins et des todiers with the white-vented euphonia as the type species.{{cite book | last=Desmarest | first=Anselme Gaëtan | year=1806 | title=Histoire naturelle des tangaras, des manakins et des todiers | place=Paris | publisher=Garnery | language=French |page=35 and plate 27 (pages and plates are not numbered) | url=https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/40241826}}{{ cite book | editor-last=Paynter | editor-first=Raymond A. Jr | year=1970 | title=Check-list of Birds of the World | volume=13 | publisher=Museum of Comparative Zoology | place=Cambridge, Massachusetts | page=340 | url=https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14483575 }}

A taxonomic analysis published in 2020 found that the genus Euphonia was paraphyletic with respect to Chlorophonia. To resolve the paraphyly the authors of the study proposed the resurrection of the genus Cyanophonia that had been introduced in 1851 by Charles Lucien Bonaparte. They suggested that the Antillean euphonia (Cyanophonia musica) should be the type species. The proposed genus would contain three species: the Antillean euphonia, the golden-rumped euphonia and the elegant euphonia. An alternative and simpler way to resolve the paraphyly would be move the three species from Euphonia into Chlorophonia, which has been followed by the IOC.{{Cite journal | last1=Imfeld | first1=Tyler S. | last2=Barker | first2=F. Keith | last3=Brumfield | first3=Robb T. | year=2020 | title=Mitochondrial genomes and thousands of ultraconserved elements resolve the taxonomy and historical biogeography of the Euphonia and Chlorophonia finches (Passeriformes: Fringillidae) | journal=The Auk | volume=137 | issue=3 | doi=10.1093/auk/ukaa016| doi-access=free }}