File talk:Periodic Table by Quality.PNG/Archive 1

update C to GA and Br to B-class.Nergaal (talk) 06:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

I have updated a provisional version with the C class. If somebody feels like the colors are not well chosen, go ahead and change them. Also, I forgot Radon is a GA now. Nergaal (talk) 22:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

Should tabs be added down the left, for the 7 periods (all start-class)? rst20xx (talk) 13:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

:I wanted to do that, but I thought it add anything as long as all periods are Start-class articles. But if you do want to add them, then go ahead. Nergaal (talk) 15:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

::You should add them and note that period 1 is a GA now. Nergaal (talk) 15:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

:::I'll add those in the next update. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 19:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

Can somebody redraw the table with all cells having the same width? Also, put the lanthanides and actinides one cell to the left. Nergaal (talk) 15:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

:I'll move the f-block over in the next update. I'm not going to resize the cells, though. I spent a long time cutting them down to fit the text as tightly as possible. There's no need for this image to be pretty, so I made it as small a file as I could. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 01:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

::It all makes sense now! Nergaal (talk) 11:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

:::Wouldn't it be smaller still to just use something like Periodic table (standard) appropriately coloured? And also much, much easier to update... rst20xx (talk) 15:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

::::Yes and not really. Having an image is easier to use, especially for the WP:Elements userbox. Also, I am not sure how easy is it to zoom into a template. On the otehr hand, having a template allows for easy linking. I guess we could have a duplicate template and we will see which one helps more. Nergaal (talk) 15:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

:::::The duplicate template is at Template:Periodic table by article quality. Double sharp (talk) 10:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

Is still start-class... rst20xx (talk) 15:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

and group 3 and 12 are C-class. Nergaal (talk) 03:45, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

:Updated. The chemistry bot keeps changing the format of its lists, so sometimes it can be difficult to accurately track changes. I appreciate your help. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 14:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

is C-class. Nergaal (talk) 22:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

:Did you change it to C-class today? You must have changed that rating just after the WP 1.0 Bot update. If you made any other changes besides the ones I updated, I'll change it now. But if tantalum is the only one that got skipped, I'll just wait until the next bot update. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 23:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

::No, it was an older rating that waws somehow missed. Check the log for July 2. Nergaal (talk) 04:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

Astatine is now rated a C-Class so can that be updated both on the image and in the to-do list on the main project page? Bonzostar (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

:Cool. Just so you know, I wait until Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Chemistry articles by quality/1 is updated, then I go through the diff to see all of the articles whose qualities have changed. That way, I can update the table/report for several articles all at once. As for the project page, feel free to update it yourself! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 21:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

Ununpentium is now a C-class. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 12:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

Group 5 element is now a Start-class.--R8R Gtrs (talk) 12:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

Okay, so there is Good article reviewing going for Rubidium and Fluorine so I prepared for that the 2 are GAs. ~~Awsome EBE123 ^talk_Contribs 22:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

{{Clear}}

Since the Bplus-class has been implemented, doesn't this have to be updated along the lines of WP:ELEM/PTQ? Lanthanum-138 (talk) 09:48, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

:Just adding a + while using the same B color should be enough here; an intermediate shade of green will likely make it harder to distinguish things. --mav (reviews needed) 22:26, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

::{{done}} (finally). Double sharp (talk) 10:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)