Henotheism#Hellenistic religion

Friedrich Schelling coined the German term {{Lang|de|Henotheismus}} {{ety|ell|ἕν (hén)|one}} and German {{Lang|de|Theismus}} 'theism' (which comes {{ety|ell|θεός (theós)|god}}).{{cite web | url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/henotheism | title=Definition of HENOTHEISM | access-date=2022-10-24 | archive-date=2022-10-24 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221024073028/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/henotheism | url-status=live }} The term refers to a form of theism focused on a single god. Related terms are monolatry and kathenotheism. The latter term is an extension of "henotheism", {{ety||καθ' ἕνα θεόν (kath' hena theon)|"one god at a time"}}.{{Cite web |url=http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=kathenotheism |title=Online Etymology Dictionary: kathenotheism |access-date=2009-06-24 |archive-date=2009-06-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090629071644/http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=kathenotheism |url-status=live }} Henotheism refers to a pluralistic theology wherein different deities are viewed to be of a unitary, equivalent divine essence.{{cite book |author1=Charles Taliaferro |author2=Victoria S. Harrison |author3=Stewart Goetz |title=The Routledge Companion to Theism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ct7fCgAAQBAJ |year=2012 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-33823-6 |pages=78–79 |access-date=2016-10-15 |archive-date=2023-01-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230115140609/https://books.google.com/books?id=ct7fCgAAQBAJ |url-status=live }} Another term related to henotheism is "equitheism", referring to the belief that all gods are equal.{{cite book|author=Carl Olson |title=The Many Colors of Hinduism: A Thematic-historical Introduction |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RVWKClYq4TUC |date=2007 |publisher=Rutgers University Press |isbn=978-0-8135-4068-9|pages=8–9}} Furthermore, the term henotheism does not exclude monism, nondualism, or dualism.{{cite book|author1=Ilai Alon |author2= Ithamar Gruenwald|author3=Itamar Singer |title= Concepts of the Other in Near Eastern Religions |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A1-l66daLgYC|date=1994 |publisher=BRILL Academic |isbn=978-9004102200 |pages=370–371 }}

Various scholars prefer the term monolatry to henotheism, to discuss religions where a single god is central, but the existence or the position of other gods is not denied.{{cite book|author = Christoph Elsas|editor=Erwin Fahlbusch |title=The Encyclopedia of Christianity |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yaecVMhMWaEC |year=1999|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans |isbn=978-90-04-11695-5 |pages=524 }} According to Christoph Elsas, henotheism in modern usage connotes a syncretic stage in the development of religions in late antiquity. A henotheist may worship a single god from a pantheon of deities at a given time, depending on his or her choice, while accepting other deities and concepts of god. Henotheism and inclusive monotheism are terms that refer to a middle position between unlimited polytheism and exclusive monotheism.[https://www.britannica.com/topic/monotheism Monotheism] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171229113308/https://www.britannica.com/topic/monotheism |date=2017-12-29 }} and [https://www.britannica.com/topic/polytheism Polytheism] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111205729/https://www.britannica.com/topic/polytheism |date=2020-11-11 }}, Encyclopædia Britannica (2014)

{{further|Zoroastrianism|Iranian studies}}

Zoroastrianism is often regarded as one of the oldest monotheistic religions in the world. Although Ahura Mazda is the supreme god, Zoroastrianism believes in lesser divinities known as Yazatas.{{cite journal | doi=10.1007/s41412-021-00113-4 | title=From Polytheism to Monotheism: Zoroaster and Some Economic Theory | date=2021 | last1=Ferrero | first1=Mario | journal=Homo Oeconomicus | volume=38 | issue=1–4 | pages=77–108 | doi-access=free }} These yazatas ("good agents") include Anahita, Sraosha, Mithra, Rashnu, and Tishtrya. According to some scholars, there are two issues that have long made it problematic to identify Zoroastrianism as true monotheism: the presence of lesser deities and dualism. But before hastening to conclude that the Amesha Spentas and the other yazatas compromise the purity of monotheism, we should consider that the other historical monotheisms too made room for other figures endowed with supernatural powers to bridge the gulf between the exalted, remote Creator God and the human world: the angels in all of them (whose conception in post-exilic Judaism was apparently developed after the pattern of the Amesha Spentas; Boyce and Grenet, 1991, 404–405), the saints and the Virgin Mary in several Christian churches, and the other persons of the Trinity in all of Christianity. Despite the vast differences with Zoroastrian theology, the common thread is that all these beings are subordinate to the Godhead as helpers or (in the case of the persons of the Trinity) co-equals, hence they do not pursue different interests and are worshiped jointly with the Godhead, not separately; therefore the supplicant's dilemma does not arise. Others such as Richard Foltz has put forth evidence that Iranians of Pre-Islamic era worshipped all these figures, especially Mithra and Anahita.Richard Foltz, "Religions of Iran: From Prehistory to the Present", Oneworld Publications, 2013, p. xiv

Prods Oktor Skjærvø states Zoroastrianism is henotheistic, and "a dualistic and polytheistic religion, but with one supreme god, who is the father of the ordered cosmos".Prods Oktor Skjærvø (2006), [http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~iranian/Zoroastrianism/Zoroastrianism1_Intro.pdf Introduction to Zoroastrianism] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170713150418/http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~iranian/Zoroastrianism/Zoroastrianism1_Intro.pdf |date=2017-07-13 }}, 2005, Harvard University Archives, p. 15 with footnote 1 Other scholars state that this is unclear, because historic texts present a conflicting picture, ranging from Zoroastrianism's belief in "one god, two gods, or a best god henotheism".{{cite book|author=Brian Arthur Brown|title=Four Testaments: Tao Te Ching, Analects, Dhammapada, Bhagavad Gita: Sacred Scriptures of Taoism, Confucianism, Buddhism, and Hinduism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_MsvDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA347|year=2016|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers|isbn=978-1-4422-6578-3|pages=347–349}}

{{further|Hinduism|Hindu views on monotheism|History of Hinduism}}

{{Quote box

|quote = To what is One

They call him Indra, Mitra, Varuna, Agni,

and he is heavenly-winged Garutman.

To what is One, sages give many a title.

|source = — Rigveda 1.164.46
Transl: Klaus Klostermaier{{cite book|author=Klaus K. Klostermaier|title=A Survey of Hinduism: Third Edition |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8CVviRghVtIC |year=2010|publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-0-7914-8011-3|pages=103 with footnote 10 on page 529}}See also, Griffith's Rigveda translation: [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Rig_Veda/Mandala_1/Hymn_164 Wikisource] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190506235352/https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Rig_Veda/Mandala_1/Hymn_164 |date=2019-05-06 }}

|bgcolor=#FFE0BB

|align = right

}}

Henotheism was the term used by scholars such as Max Müller to describe the theology of Vedic religion.Sugirtharajah, Sharada, Imagining Hinduism: A Postcolonial Perspective, Routledge, 2004, p.44; Müller noted that the hymns of the Rigveda, the oldest scripture of Hinduism, mention many deities, but praises them successively as the "one ultimate, supreme God", alternatively as "one supreme Goddess",{{cite book|author=William A. Graham |title=Beyond the Written Word: Oral Aspects of Scripture in the History of Religion |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XzYX0T-ZqTcC |year=1993|publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-44820-8 |pages=70–71 }} thereby asserting that the essence of the deities was unitary (ekam), and the deities were nothing but pluralistic manifestations of the same concept of the divine (God).

The Vedic era conceptualization of the divine or the One, states Jeaneane Fowler, is more abstract than a monotheistic God, it is the Reality behind and of the phenomenal universe. The Vedic hymns treat it as "limitless, indescribable, absolute principle", thus the Vedic divine is something of a panentheism rather than simple henotheism. In late Vedic era, around the start of Upanishadic age (~800 BCE), theosophical speculations emerge that develop concepts which scholars variously call nondualism or monism, as well as forms of non-theism and pantheism.{{cite book |author=Jeaneane D. Fowler |title=Perspectives of Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Hinduism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8dRZ4E-qgz8C |year=2002 |publisher=Sussex Academic Press |isbn=978-1-898723-93-6 |pages=43–44 }}{{Dead link|date=October 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}{{cite book|author=James L. Ford |title=The Divine Quest, East and West: A Comparative Study of Ultimate Realities |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Tk14CwAAQBAJ |year=2016|publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-1-4384-6055-0 |pages=308–309 }}{{cite book|author=Ninian Smart|title=The Yogi and the Devotee (Routledge Revivals): The Interplay Between the Upanishads and Catholic Theology |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yHE2aL8735AC |year=2013|publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-136-62933-4 |pages=46–47, 117 }} An example of the questioning of the concept of God, in addition to henotheistic hymns found therein, are in later portions of the Rigveda, such as the Nasadiya Sukta.{{cite book|author=Jessica Frazier |editor=Russell Re Manning|title= The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eFGYYtfBGFYC |year=2013|publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-161171-1 |pages=172–173 }} Hinduism calls the metaphysical absolute concept as Brahman, incorporating within it the transcendent and immanent reality.PT Raju (2006), Idealistic Thought of India, Routledge, {{ISBN|978-1406732627}}, page 426 and Conclusion chapter part XII{{cite book|author=Jeffrey Brodd|title=World Religions: A Voyage of Discovery|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hPiv0w6BDSQC|year=2003|publisher=Saint Mary's Press|isbn=978-0-88489-725-5|pages=43–45}}Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-8120814684}}, page 91 Different schools of thought interpret Brahman as either personal, impersonal or transpersonal. Ishwar Chandra Sharma describes it as "Absolute Reality, beyond all dualities of existence and non-existence, light and darkness, and of time, space and cause."Ishwar Chandra Sharma, Ethical Philosophies of India, Harper & Row, 1970, p.75.

{{further|Hellenistic religion}}

While Greek and Roman religion began as polytheism, during the Classical period, under the influence of philosophy, differing conceptions emerged. Often Zeus (or Jupiter) was considered the supreme, all-powerful and all-knowing king and father of the Olympian gods. According to Maijastina Kahlos, "monotheism was pervasive in the educated circles in Late Antiquity" and "all divinities were interpreted as aspects, particles or epithets of one supreme God".{{cite book |first=Maijastina |last=Kahlos |year=2007 |title=Debate and Dialogue: Christian and pagan cultures {{circa|360–430}} |publisher=Ashgate Publishing}}{{rp|style=ama|pp= 145, 160}} Maximus Tyrius (2nd century CE) stated: "In such a mighty contest, sedition and discord, you will see one according law and assertion in all the earth, that there is one God, the king and father of all things, and many gods, sons of God, ruling together with him."{{cite book |first=Maximus |last=Tyrius |author-link=Maximus Tyrius |editor-first=Thomas |editor-last=Taylor |year=1804 |chapter=Dissertation I. What God is according to Plato |title=The Dissertations of Maximus Tyrius |page=5}} The Neoplatonic philosopher Plotinus taught that above the gods of traditional belief was "The One".{{rp|style=ama|pp= 145, 160}} Maximus, the polytheist grammarian of Madauros,{{rp|style=ama|pp= 70}} even stated that "only a madman would deny the existence of the supreme God".{{rp|style=ama|pp= 145, 160}}

Second Temple Judaism and Rabbinical Judaism are emphatically monotheistic; however, its predecessor—the cult of Yahweh as it was practiced in ancient Israel during the 9th and 8th centuries BCE (Yahwism)—has been described as henotheistic or monolatric. For example, the Moabites worshipped the god Chemosh, the Edomites, Qaus, both of whom were part of the greater Canaanite pantheon, headed by the chief god, El. The Canaanite pantheon consisted of El and Asherah as the chief deities, with 70 sons who were said to rule over each of the nations of the earth. These sons were each worshiped within a specific region. Kurt Noll states that "the Bible preserves a tradition that Yahweh used to 'live' in the south, in the land of Edom" and that the original god of Israel was El Shaddai.K. L. Noll Canaan and Israel in Antiquity: An Introduction, Continuum, 2002, p.123

Several biblical stories allude to the belief that the Canaanite gods all existed and were thought to possess the most power in the lands by the people who worshiped them and their sacred objects; their power was believed to be real and could be invoked by the people who patronized them. There are numerous accounts of surrounding nations of Israel showing fear or reverence for the Israelite God despite their continued polytheistic practices.David Bridger, Samuel Wolk et al., The New Jewish Encyclopedia, Behrman House, 1976, pp.326-7 For instance, in 1 Samuel 4, the Philistines fret before the second battle of Aphek when they learn that the Israelites are bearing the Ark of the Covenant, and therefore Yahweh, into battle. The Israelites were forbidden to worship other deities; according to some interpretations of the Bible, they were not fully monotheistic before the Babylonian captivity. The biblical scholar Mark S. Smith refers to this stage as a form of monolatry.Mark S. Smith, The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel, Eerdmans Publishing, 2002, pp.58, 183 Smith argues that Yahweh underwent a process of merging with El and that acceptance of cults of Asherah was common in the period of the Judges. 2 Kings 3:27 has been interpreted as describing a human sacrifice in Moab that led the invading Israelite army to fear the power of Chemosh.Gregory A. Boyd, God at War: The Bible & Spiritual Conflict, InterVarsity Press, 1997, p.118

Paul the Apostle, in his First Epistle to the Corinthians, writes that "we know that an idol is nothing" and "that there is none other God but one".Bible, {{bibleverse|1|Corinthians|8:4-6|KJV}} He argues in verse 5 that "for though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth", "but to us there is but one God". Some translators of verse 5 put the words "gods" and "lords" in quotes to indicate that they are gods or lords only so-called.{{cite web |title= 1 Corinthians 8:5b, in the NKJV and several versions |url= http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=1Cr&c=8&t=NKJV#vrsn/5 |access-date= 19 March 2013 |website= blueletterbible.org |archive-date= 27 May 2015 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150527201640/http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=1Cr&c=8&t=NKJV#vrsn/5 |url-status= live }}

In his Second Epistle to the Corinthians, Paul refers to "the god of this world",{{bibleverse|2|Corinthians|4:4|KJV}} which the 18th-century theologian John Gill interpreted as a reference to Satan or the material things put before God, such as money, rather than acknowledging any separate deity from God.{{cite book |last= Gill |first= John|title= John Gill's Exposition of the Bible|pages= 2 Corinthians 4:4}}

Some scholars have written that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) can be characterized as henotheistic but others have rejected that stance. Eugene England, a professor at Brigham Young University, asserted that LDS Presidents Brigham Young and Joseph Fielding Smith along with the LDS scholar B. H. Roberts used the LDS interpretation of 1 Corinthians 8:5–6 as "a brief explanation of how it is possible to be both a Christian polytheist (technically a henotheist) and a monotheist".Englund, Eugene. "The Weeping God of Mormonism". Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, 35(1), Spring 2002, pp. 63–80. BYU Professor Roger R. Keller rejected descriptions of the LDS Church as polytheistic by countering, as summarized by a reviewer, "Mormons are fundamentally monotheistic because they deal with only one god out of the many which exist."Sillman, H. Jeffrey. "A One-Sided Dialogue", Sunstone, June 1989, pp. 48–49 (review of Roger R. Keller's "Reformed Christians and Mormon Christians: Let's Talk", Ann Arbor, Michigan: Pryor Pettengill, 1986)

In their book, Mormon America: The Power and the Promise, Richard and Joan Ostling, wrote that some Mormons are comfortable describing themselves as henotheists.Osterling, Richard and Osterline, Joan (2007). Mormon America: the power and the promise. HarperCollins. p. 310 Kurt Widmer, professor at the University of Lethbridge, described LDS beliefs as a "cosmic henotheism".Kurt Widmer. Mormonism and the Nature of God: A Theological Evolution, 1830–1915. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland, 2000, p. 158 A review of Widmer's book by Bruening and Paulsen in the FARMS Review of Books countered that Widmer's hypothesis was "strongly disconfirmed in light of the total evidence".Bruening, Ari D. and Paulsen, David L.. "The Development of the Mormon Understanding of God: Early Mormon Modalism and Early Myths". FARMS Review of Books 13/2 (2001), pp. 109–169. Van Hale wrote that "Mormonism teaches the existence of gods who are not the Father, Son, or Holy Ghost" and "the existence of more than one god [is] clearly a Mormon doctrine", but he also said that defining this belief system in theological terms was troublesome. According to Van Hale, henotheism might appear to be "promising" in describing LDS beliefs but is ultimately not accurate because henotheism was intended to describe the worship of a god that was restricted to a specific geographical area.Hale, Van. "Defining the Mormon Doctrine of Deity: What Can Theological Terminology Tell Us About Our Own Beliefs?" Sunstone 10 (January 1985), pp. 23–27.

In Japan, many Japanese new religions can be considered to be monotheistic (such as Tenrikyo){{cite thesis| last=Amis |first=Joel |date=2015 |title=The Japanese new religion Oomoto : reconciliation of nativist and internationalist trends |publisher=Université du Québec à Montréal |type=Master's thesis |url=https://archipel.uqam.ca/8089/}} or henotheistic (such as Konkokyo).{{cite web | last=D. | first=John | title=Konkokyo priestess interview (Bernkastel) | website=Green Shinto | date=2018-02-05 | url=https://www.greenshinto.com/2018/02/06/konkokyo-priestess-interview-bernkastel/ | access-date=2025-05-03}}

• Comparative religion
• Henosis – Mystical "oneness", "union", or "unity" in classical Greek
• King of the gods – A tendency for one divinity, usually male, to achieve preeminence
• Monolatry – It is the belief in the existence of many gods, but with the consistent worship of only one deity.

{{Portal bar|Religion|Mythology|Hinduism|Christianity|Judaism|Islam}}

{{reflist|30em}}

• [http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/religion/blrel_theism_heno.htm What are Henotheism and Monolatry?] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111103042028/http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/religion/blrel_theism_heno.htm |date=2011-11-03 }} in About Religion
• [http://www.sofiatopia.org/equiaeon/henotheism.htm On Henotheism] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070604202821/http://www.sofiatopia.org/equiaeon/henotheism.htm |date=2007-06-04 }} in Sofiatopia

{{Theism}}

{{philosophy of religion}}

{{Theology}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:Monotheism

Category:Polytheism

Category:Theism

Category:Religion in ancient Israel and Judah