History of Sumer

:::Dates are approximate information, consult particular article for details

::: Uruk III = Jemdet Nasr period

File:Cities of Sumer (en).svg]]

Permanent year-round urban settlement may have been prompted by intensive agricultural practices. The work required in maintaining irrigation canals called for, and the resulting surplus food enabled, relatively concentrated populations. The centres of Eridu and Uruk, two of the earliest cities, had successively elaborated large temple complexes built of mud brick. Developing as small shrines with the earliest settlements, by the Early Dynastic I period, they had become the most imposing structures in their respective cities, each dedicated to its own respective god. From south to north, the principal temple-cities, their principal temple complex, and the gods they served,George, Andrew (1993), House Most High. The Temples of Ancient Mesopotamia, Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. were

Before 3000 BCE the political life of the city was headed by a priest-king (ensi) assisted by a council of eldersJacobsen, Thorkild (Ed) (1939),"The Sumerian King List" (Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago; Assyriological Studies, No. 11.) and based on these temples, but it is unknown how the cities had secular rulers rise in prominence from the earliest times.Harriet Crawford. Sumer and the Sumerians. 2004. Page 28 The development and system of administration led to the development of archaic tabletsCuneiform. By C. B. F. Walker. around 3500 BCERecords of the Past, Volume 5, Issue 11. Edited by Henry Mason Baum, Frederick Bennett Wright, George Frederick Wright. Records of the Past Exploration Society., 1906. Pg 352.–3200 BCE[http://www-personal.umich.edu/~piotrm/WRISYRRE.htm The Adaptation of Cuneiform to Akkadian] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130823172941/http://www-personal.umich.edu/~piotrm/WRISYRRE.htm |date=2013-08-23 }} Piotr Michalowski University of Michigan, Ann Arbor and ideographic writing (c. 3100 BCE) was developed into logographic writing around 2500 BCE (and a mixed form by about 2350 BCE).Western Civilization: Beyond Boundaries. Cengage Learning, Jan 1, 2008. pages 12–13. As Sumerologist Christopher WoodsChristopher Woods. Associate Professor of Sumerian. http://nelc.uchicago.edu/faculty/woods {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130410071358/http://nelc.uchicago.edu/faculty/woods |date=2013-04-10 }} points out in Earliest Mesopotamian Writing: "A precise date for the earliest cuneiform texts has proved elusive, as virtually all the tablets were discovered in secondary archaeological contexts, specifically, in rubbish heaps that defy accurate stratigraphic analysis. The sun-hardened clay tablets, having obviously outlived their usefulness, were used along with other waste, such as potsherds, clay sealings, and broken mud bricks, as fill in leveling the foundations of new construction—consequently, it is impossible to establish when the tablets were written and used."{{citation |last1=Woods |first1=Christopher |editor1-first=Christopher |editor1-last=Woods |title=Visible Language. Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East and Beyond |chapter-url=http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/oimp32.pdf |series=Oriental Institute Museum Publications |volume=32 |year=2010 |publisher=University of Chicago |location=Chicago |isbn=978-1-885923-76-9 |chapter=The Earliest Mesopotamian Writing |pages=33–50 |access-date=2013-07-19 |archive-date=2021-08-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210826005847/https://oi.uchicago.edu//sites/oi.uchicago.edu/files/uploads/shared/docs/oimp32.pdf |url-status=dead }} Even so, it is proposed that the ideas of writing developed across the area, according to Theo J. H. Krispijn,The Idea of Writing: Writing Across Borders. Edited by Alex de Voogt, Joachim Friedrich Quack. BRILL, Dec 9, 2011. Page [https://books.google.com/books?id=KTA6MsEjkPIC&pg=PA181 181] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231129102521/https://books.google.com/books?id=KTA6MsEjkPIC&pg=PA181#v=onepage&q&f=false |date=2023-11-29 }}.Drs. T.J.H. (Theo) Krispijn - Assyriology - Faculty of Humanities http://www.hum.leiden.edu/lias/organisation/assyriology/krispijntjh.html {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130519015253/http://www.hum.leiden.edu/lias/organisation/assyriology/krispijntjh.html |date=2013-05-19 }} along the following time-frame:via Dietrich Sürenhagen (1999)

Relative stratigraphy chronology

ImageSize = width:555 height:75

PlotArea = left:25 right:15 bottom:20 top:25

AlignBars = justify

Colors =

id:time value:rgb(0.7,0.7,1) #

id:period value:rgb(1,0.7,0.5) #

id:age value:rgb(0.95,0.85,0.5) #

id:era value:rgb(1,0.85,0.5) #

id:eon value:rgb(1,0.85,0.7) #

id:filler value:gray(0.8) # background bar

id:black value:black

Period = from:-5300 till:-1940

TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal

ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:200 start:-5300

ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:50 start:-5300

PlotData =

align:center textcolor:black fontsize:10 mark:(line,black)

mark:(line,black) textcolor:black fontsize:M

bar:  mark:(line,black) align:center shift:(0,15)

at:-3400 text:A width:20

at:-3300 text:B width:20

at:-3240 text:C width:20

at:-3000 text:D width:20

bar:  color:era mark:(line,black) width:10

from:-4100 till:-3300 shift:(0,0) text:Uruk XIV-V

from:-3300 till:-3000 shift:(0,0) text:Uruk IV

from:-3100 till:-2900 shift:(0,-10) text: Uruk III

:::A : c. 3400 BCE : numerical tablet; B : c. 3300 BCE : numerical tablet with logograms;
C : c. 3240 BCE : script (phonograms); D : c. 3000 BCE : lexical script

The pre- and protohistory of southern Mesopotamia is divided into the Ubaid (c. 6500–3800 BC), Uruk (c. 4000 to 3100 BC) and Jemdet Nasr (c. 3100 to 2900 BC) periods. There is scholarly disagreement as to when the Sumerian presence began in the region, although it is generally assumed that the Sumerian language was used in southern Mesopotamia by the late Uruk period. Some scholars believe that the Sumerians migrated to the area as late as c. 3600 BC, whereas others believe that the Sumerian presence goes back to the early Ubaid period or even prior to that.{{cite book|first1=William H. Jr.|last1=Stiebing|title=Ancient Near Eastern History and Culture|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DoyTDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA40|publisher=Routledge|date=2016|isbn=978-1-315-51116-0|pages=39–40|access-date=2023-07-27|archive-date=2023-07-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230727002749/https://books.google.com/books?id=DoyTDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA40|url-status=live}}

{{main|Early Dynastic Period (Mesopotamia)}}

The Early Dynastic Period began after a cultural break with the preceding Jemdet Nasr period that has been radio-carbon dated to about 2900 BC at the beginning of the Early Dynastic I Period. No inscriptions have yet been found verifying any names of kings that can be associated with the Early Dynastic I period. The ED I period is distinguished from the ED II period by the narrow cylinder seals of the ED I period and the broader wider ED II seals engraved with banquet scenes or animal-contest scenes.Georges Roux, Ancient Iraq, page 129 The Early Dynastic II period is when Gilgamesh, the famous king of Uruk, is believed to have reigned.Georges Roux, Ancient Iraq, p. 502 Texts from the ED II period are not yet understood. Later inscriptions have been found bearing some Early Dynastic II names from the Sumerian King List. The Early Dynastic IIIa period, also known as the Fara period, is when syllabic writing began. Accounting records and an undeciphered logographic script existed before the Fara Period, but the full flow of human speech was first recorded about 2600 BC at the beginning of the Fara Period. The Early Dynastic IIIb period is also known as the Pre-Sargonic period.

Hegemony, which came to be conferred by the Nippur priesthood, alternated among a number of competing dynasties, hailing from Sumerian city-states traditionally including Kish, Uruk, Ur, Adab and Akshak, as well as some from outside of southern Mesopotamia, such as Awan, Hamazi, and Mari, until the Akkadians, under Sargon of Akkad, overtook the area.

File:Tableta con trillo.png, a limestone tablet from Kish with pictographic, early cuneiform, writing (ca. 3350–3200 BC). Possibly the earliest known example of writing. Ashmolean Museum.]]

{{see|Kish (Sumer)}}

The earliest Dynastic name on the list known from other legendary sources is Etana, whom it calls "the shepherd, who ascended to heaven and consolidated all the foreign countries". He was estimated by RouxRoux, Georges 1971, "Ancient Iraq", Penguin, Harmondsworth. to have lived approximately 3000 BC. Among the 11 kings who followed, a number of Semitic Akkadian names are recorded, suggesting that these people made up a sizable proportion of the population of this northern city. The earliest monarch on the list whose historical existence has been independently attested through archaeological inscription is En-me-barage-si of Kish (c. 2600 BC), said to have defeated Elam and built the temple of Enlil in Nippur. Enmebaragesi's successor, Aga, is said to have fought with Gilgamesh of Uruk, the fifth king of that city. From this time, for a period Uruk seems to have had some kind of hegemony in Sumer. This illustrates a weakness of the Sumerian king list, as contemporaries are often placed in successive dynasties, making reconstruction difficult.

File:Rolzegel.JPG, symbolized by two rams, framed by reed bundles as on the Uruk Vase. Late Uruk period, 3300–3000 BC. Pergamon Museum/ Vorderasiatisches Museum.{{cite book |title=Art of the First Cities: The Third Millennium B.C. from the Mediterranean to the Indus |date=2003 |publisher= Metropolitan Museum of Art |isbn= 978-1-58839043-1 |page= [https://archive.org/details/artoffirstcities0000unse/page/481 481] |url= https://archive.org/details/artoffirstcities0000unse |url-access= registration}}{{cite web |title= Vorderasiatisches Museum Berlin |url= http://repository.edition-topoi.org/collection/VMRS/single/1769/2 |website= Repository |publisher= Edition Topoi |access-date= 2020-03-02 |archive-date= 2019-04-02 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190402122509/http://repository.edition-topoi.org/collection/VMRS/single/1769/2 |url-status= live }}]]

{{see|Uruk}}

Mesh-ki-ang-gasher is listed as the first King of Uruk. He was followed by Enmerkar.Identified by David Rohl with Nimrod the Hunter, mentioned in the Bible as founding Erech The epic Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta{{cite web|url=http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/etcsl.cgi?text=t.1.8.2.3|title=The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature|website=ETCSL|publisher=Oxford|place=UK|access-date=23 April 2018|archive-date=26 September 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110926233654/http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/etcsl.cgi?text=t.1.8.2.3|url-status=live}} tells of his voyage by river to Aratta, a mountainous, mineral-rich country up-river from Sumer. He was followed by Lugalbanda, also known from fragmentary legends, and then by Dumuzid, the Fisherman. The most famous monarch of this dynasty was Dumuzid's successor Gilgamesh, hero of the Epic of Gilgamesh, where he is called Lugalbanda's son. Ancient, fragmentary copies of this text have been discovered in locations as far apart as Hattusas in Anatolia, Megiddo in Israel, and Tell el Amarna in Egypt.

{{main|First Dynasty of Ur}}

File:Golden helmet of Meskalamdug in the British Museum.jpg, ruler of the First Dynasty of Ur, 26th century BCE.]]

This dynasty is dated to the 26th century BC.{{cite book |title=The Cambridge Ancient History |date=1970 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=9780521070515 |page=[https://archive.org/details/cambridgeancient0001unse/page/228 228] |url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgeancient0001unse |url-access=registration |language=en}} Meskalamdug is the first archaeologically recorded king (Lugal from lu=man, gal=big) of the city of Ur. He was succeeded by his son Akalamdug, and Akalamdug by his son Mesh-Ane-pada. Mesh-Ane-pada is the first king of Ur listed on the king list, and it says he defeated Lugalkildu of Uruk. He also seems to have subjected Kish, thereafter assuming the title "King of Kish" for himself. This title would be used by many kings of the preeminent dynasties for some time afterward. King Mesilim of Kish is known from inscriptions from Lagash and Adab stating that he built temples in those cities, where he seems to have held some influence. He is also mentioned in some of the earliest monuments from Lagash as arbitrating a border dispute between Lugal-sha-engur, ensi (high priest or governor) of Lagash, and the ensi of their main rival, the neighbouring town of Umma. Mesilim's placement before, during, or after the reign of Mesannepada in Ur is uncertain, owing to the lack of other synchronous names in the inscriptions, and his absence from the king list.

{{Main|Awan dynasty}}

File:Ur-Nanshe_King_of_Lagash_in_the_limestone_votive_relief_of_Ur-Nanshe.jpg, king of Lagash circa 2500 BCE.]]

This dynasty is dated to the 26th century BC, about the same time as Elam is also mentioned clearly.D. T. Potts, [https://books.google.com/books?id=WE62CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA79 The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221123080707/https://books.google.ca/books?id=WE62CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA79 |date=2022-11-23 }} Cambridge World Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, 2015 {{ISBN|1107094690}} p79 According to the Sumerian king list, Elam, Sumer's neighbor to the east, held the kingship in Sumer for a brief period, based in the city of Awan.

{{see|Uruk}}

Enshakushanna was a king of Uruk in the later 3rd millennium BC who is named on the Sumerian king list, which states his reign to have been 60 years. He was succeeded in Uruk by Lugal-kinishe-dudu, but the hegemony seems to have passed briefly to Eannatum of Lagash.

Following this period, the region of Mesopotamia seems to have come under the sway of a Sumerian conqueror from Adab, Lugal-Ane-mundu, ruling over Uruk, Ur, and Lagash. According to inscriptions, he ruled from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean, and up to the Zagros Mountains, including Elam.Samuel Kramer, The Sumerians, 51-52. However, his empire fell apart with his death; the king-list indicates that Mari in Upper Mesopotamia was the next city to hold the hegemony.

The Third Dynasty of Kish, represented solely by Kug-Bau or Kubaba, is unique in the fact that she was the only woman named on the king-list to reign as "king". It adds that she had been a tavern keeper before overthrowing the hegemony of Mari and becoming monarch. In later centuries she was worshipped as a minor goddess, particularly at Carchemish, achieving some status in the Hurrian and Hittites periods. In the post-Hittite Phrygian period she was called Kubele (Latin Cybele), Great Mother of the Gods.{{Citation needed|date=September 2020}}

Akshak too achieved independence with a line of rulers extending from Puzur-Nirah, Ishu-Il, and Shu-Suen, son of Ishu-Il, before being defeated by the rulers in the Fourth Dynasty of Kish.

{{see|Lagash}}

File:Relief Ur-Nanshe Louvre AO2344.jpg: top, creating the foundation for a shrine; bottom, presiding over its dedication (Louvre)]]

File:Stele of Vultures detail 01-transparent.png's Stele of the Vultures (Louvre)]]

This dynasty is dated to the 25th century BC.{{Citation needed|date=November 2011}} En-hegal is recorded as the first known ruler of Lagash, being tributary to Uruk. His successor Lugal-sha-engur was similarly tributary to Mesilim. Following the hegemony of Mesannepada of Ur, Ur-Nanshe succeeded Lugal-sha-engur as the new high priest of Lagash and achieved independence, making himself king. He defeated Ur and captured the king of Umma, Pabilgaltuk. In the ruins of a building attached by him to the temple of Ningirsu, terracotta bas reliefs of the king and his sons have been found, as well as onyx plates and lions' heads in onyx reminiscent of Egyptian work.{{EB1911 |inline=y |wstitle=Babylonia and Assyria |volume=3 |pages=99–112 |first1=Archibald Henry |last1=Sayce |author1-link=Archibald Sayce |first2=Leonard William |last2=King |author2-link=Leonard William King |first3=Morris |last3=Jastrow |author3-link=Morris Jastrow Jr.}} One inscription states that ships of Dilmun (Bahrain) brought him wood as tribute from foreign lands. He was succeeded by his son Akurgal.

Eannatum, grandson of Ur-Nanshe, made himself master of the whole of the district of Sumer, together with the cities of Uruk (ruled by Enshakushana), Ur, Nippur, Akshak, and Larsa. He also annexed the kingdom of Kish; however, it recovered its independence after his death. Umma was made tributary—a certain amount of grain being levied upon each person in it, that had to be paid into the treasury of the goddess Nina and the god Ningirsu. Eannatum's campaigns extended beyond the confines of Sumer, and he overran a part of Elam, took the city of Az on the Persian Gulf, and exacted tribute as far as Mari; however many of the realms he conquered were often in revolt. During his reign, temples and palaces were repaired or erected at Lagash and elsewhere; the town of Nina{{Citation needed|date=March 2008}}—that probably gave its name to the later Niniveh—was rebuilt, and canals and reservoirs were excavated. Eannatum was succeeded by his brother, En-anna-tum I. During his rule, Umma once more asserted independence under Ur-Lumma, who attacked Lagash unsuccessfully. Ur-Lumma was replaced by a priest-king, Illi, who also attacked Lagash.

His son and successor Entemena restored the prestige of Lagash. Illi of Umma was subdued, with the help of his ally Lugal-kinishe-dudu or Lugal-ure of Uruk, successor to Enshakushana and also on the king-list. Lugal-kinishe-dudu seems to have been the prominent figure at the time, since he also claimed to rule Kish and Ur. A silver vase dedicated by Entemena to his god is now in the Louvre. A frieze of lions devouring ibexes and deer, incised with great artistic skill, runs round the neck, while the eagle crest of Lagash adorns the globular part. The vase is a proof of the high degree of excellence to which the goldsmith's art had already attained. A vase of calcite, also dedicated by Entemena, has been found at Nippur. After Entemena, a series of weak, corrupt priest-kings is attested for Lagash. The last of these, Urukagina, was known for his judicial, social, and economic reforms, and his may well be the first legal code known to have existed.

Urukagina (c. 2359–2335 BC short chronology) was overthrown and his city Lagash captured by Lugal-zage-si, the high priest of Umma. Lugal-zage-si also took Uruk and Ur, and made Uruk his capital. In a long inscription that he made engraved on hundreds of stone vases dedicated to Enlil of Nippur, he boasts that his kingdom extended "from the Lower Sea (Persian Gulf), along the Tigris and Euphrates, to the Upper Sea" or Mediterranean. His empire was overthrown by Sargon of Akkad.

{{Main article|Akkadian Empire}}

File:Victory stele of Naram Sin 9066.jpg at the Louvre, Paris.]]The Akkadian period lasted c. 2334–2147 BC (middle chronology). The following is a list of known kings of this period:

{{further|Gutian dynasty of Sumer}}

Following the fall of Sargon's Empire to the Gutians, a brief "Dark Ages" ensued. This period lasted c. 2141–2050 BC (short chronology).

{{further|Lagash}}

Image:Ur-Ningirsu ruler of Lagash circa 2110 BCE.jpg , prince of Lagash, circa 2110 BCE. Louvre Museum.]]

This period lasted c. 2260–2110 BC.{{Citation needed|date=November 2011}}

{{further|Uruk}}

This dynasty lasted between c. 2055–2048 BC short chronology. The Gutians were ultimately driven out by the Sumerians under Utu-hegal, the only king of this dynasty, who in turn was defeated by Ur-Nammu of Ur.

{{Main article|Third Dynasty of Ur}}

File:King Ur-Nammu.jpg, founder of the Third Dynasty of Ur, on a cylinder seal.{{cite web |title=Hash-hamer Cylinder seal of Ur-Nammu |url=https://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=368841&partId=1 |website=British Museum |access-date=2019-03-31 |archive-date=2019-03-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190328104204/https://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=368841&partId=1 |url-status=live }}]]

The Third Dynasty of Ur is dated to c. 2047–1940 BC short chronology. Ur-Nammu of Ur defeated Utu-hegal of Uruk and founded the Third Dynasty of Ur. Although the Sumerian language ("Emegir") was again made official, Sumerian identity was already in decline, as the population became continually absorbed into the Akkadian (Assyro-Babylonian) population.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XFwUxmCdG94C|title=Syntactic Change in Akkadian: The Evolution of Sentential Complementation|publisher=Oxford University Press US|year=2007|isbn=978-0-19-953222-3|pages=20–21|author=Deutscher, Guy|author-link=Guy Deutscher (linguist)|access-date=2020-10-06|archive-date=2023-04-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230418050423/https://books.google.com/books?id=XFwUxmCdG94C|url-status=live}}Woods C. 2006 "Bilingualism, Scribal Learning, and the Death of Sumerian". In S. L. Sanders (ed) Margins of Writing, Origins of Culture: 91–120 Chicago [http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/OIS2.pdf] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130429121058/http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/OIS2.pdf|date=2013-04-29}}

After the Ur III dynasty was destroyed by the Elamites in 2004 BC, a fierce rivalry developed between the city-states of Larsa, more under Elamite than Sumerian influence, and Isin, that was more Amorite (as the Western Semitic nomads were called). Archaeologically, the fall of the Ur III dynasty corresponds to the beginning of the Middle Bronze Age. The Semites ended up prevailing in Mesopotamia by the time of Hammurabi of Babylon, who founded the Babylonian Empire, and the language and name of Sumer gradually passed into the realm of antiquarian scholars. Nevertheless, Sumerian influence on Babylonia, and all subsequent cultures in the region, was undeniably great.

During the third millennium BC, there developed a very intimate cultural symbiosis between the Sumerians and the Akkadians, which included widespread bilingualism. The influence of Sumerian on Akkadian (and vice versa) is evident in all areas, from lexical borrowing on a massive scale, to syntactic, morphological, and phonological convergence. This has prompted scholars to refer to Sumerian and Akkadian in the third millennium as a sprachbund.

Akkadian gradually replaced Sumerian as the spoken language of Mesopotamia somewhere around the turn of the third and the second millennium BC (the exact dating being a matter of debate), but Sumerian continued to be used as a sacred, ceremonial, literary and scientific language in Mesopotamia until the first century AD.

• History of Mesopotamia
• Jawa
• List of Mesopotamian dynasties
• History of institutions in Mesopotamia

{{reflist|30em}}

{{Ancient Mesopotamia}}

{{Ancient Near East}}

{{Rulers of Sumer}}

Category:Sumer

Category:History of Mesopotamia

Category:Articles which contain graphical timelines