Homestead Acts#Enlarged Homestead Act of 1909

{{Short description|US laws allowing ownership of unclaimed land}}

The Homestead Acts were several laws in the United States by which an applicant could acquire ownership of government land or the public domain, typically called a homestead. In all, more than {{convert|160|e6acre|e3km2 e3sqmi|abbr=unit}} of public land, or nearly 10 percent of the total area of the United States, were given away free to 1.6 million homesteaders; most of the homesteads were west of the Mississippi River.

An extension of the homestead principle in law, the Homestead Acts were an expression of the Free Soil policy of Northerners who wanted individual farmers to own and operate their own farms, as opposed to Southern slave owners who wanted to buy up large tracts of land and use slave labor, thereby shutting out free white farmers.

For a number of years individual Congressmen put forward bills providing for homesteading,[https://archive.org/details/jstor-1834687 Some Political Aspects of Homestead Legislation by John Bell Sanborn][https://books.google.com/books?id=RLZnSvkwzbIC&dq=Chapters+history+social+legislation+United+States&pg=PR13 Chapters in the History of Social Legislation in the United States to 1860 By Henry Walcott Farnam, 2000, P.138] but it was not until 1862 that the first homestead act was passed. The Homestead Act of 1862 opened up millions of acres. Any adult who had never taken up arms against the federal government of the United States could apply. Women and immigrants who had applied for citizenship were eligible. Most homesteading occurred during the period of 1900–1930.{{Cite journal |last1=Allen |first1=Douglas W. |last2=Leonard |first2=Bryan |date=2024 |title=Late Homesteading: Native Land Dispossession through Strategic Occupation |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/late-homesteading-native-land-dispossession-through-strategic-occupation/7E9F48FE4E0960870DE63C4257A43432 |journal=American Political Science Review |pages=1–15 |language=en |doi=10.1017/S0003055423001466 |issn=0003-0554|doi-access=free }}

Background

Land-grant laws similar to the Homestead Acts had been proposed by northern Republicans prior to Civil War but they had been repeatedly blocked in Congress by Democrats who wanted western lands open for purchase by slave owners. The Homestead Act of 1860 passed in Congress but was vetoed by President James Buchanan, a Democrat. After the Southern states seceded from the Union in 1861 (and their representatives had left Congress), the bill passed and was signed into law by President Abraham Lincoln (May 20, 1862).{{cite web |url=http://www.nps.gov/home/faqs.htm |title=Homestead National Monument: Frequently Asked Questions |publisher=National Park Service |access-date=May 26, 2009}} Daniel Freeman became the first person to file a claim under the new act.

Between 1862 and 1934, the federal government granted 1.6 million homesteads and distributed {{convert|270000000|acre|mi2}} of federal land for private ownership. This was a total of 10% of all land in the United States.[https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/homestead-act/ The Homestead Act of 1862]; Archives.gov Homesteading was discontinued in 1976, except in Alaska, where it continued until 1986. About 40% of the applicants who started the process were able to complete it and obtain title to their homesteaded land after paying a small fee in cash.US Department of the Interior, National Park Service. [http://www.nps.gov/home/historyculture/bynumbers.htm "Homesteading by the Numbers"], accessed February 5, 2010.

Homestead laws depleted Native American resources as much of the land they relied on was taken by the federal government and sold to settlers.{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-native-americans-battled-a-brutal-land-grab-by-an-expanding-america/2016/11/04/69dd7c00-8402-11e6-92c2-14b64f3d453f_story.html |title=How Native Americans battled a brutal land grab by an expanding America |first=Priyanka |last=Kumar |date=November 4, 2016 |newspaper=Washington Post}} Native ancestral lands had been limited through history, mainly through land allotments and reservations, causing a gradual decrease in this indigenous land. Many of these land-grabs occurred during and after treaty negotiations between indigenous tribes and the United States. Native Americans often traded their land in exchange for citizenship and civil rights. Due to the United States' economic power, these tribes had little leverage and millions of acres of land were transferred from their ownership.{{Cite journal |last=Spirling |first=Arthur |date=January 2012 |title=U.S. Treaty Making with American Indians: Institutional Change and Relative Power, 1784–1911 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00558.x |journal=American Journal of Political Science |language=en |volume=56 |issue=1 |pages=84–97 |doi=10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00558.x |issn=0092-5853}} It was difficult for indigenous people to legally challenge this infringement because they lacked legal rights and legal standing. These treaties were used to naturalize and civilize Native Americans.Rollings, William Hughes (2004). "Citizenship and Suffrage: The Native American Struggle for Civil Rights in the American West, 1830-1965". Nevada Law Journal. 5 (1): 126–140.

As an indirect, de facto way to secure the dispossessed land, the US government allowed late homesteading during the early twentieth century.{{Cite journal |last1=Allen |first1=Douglas W. |last2=Leonard |first2=Bryan |date=2024-02-16 |title=Late Homesteading: Native Land Dispossession through Strategic Occupation |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055423001466/type/journal_article |journal=American Political Science Review |language=en |pages=1–15 |doi=10.1017/S0003055423001466 |issn=0003-0554|doi-access=free }} This acted as a way to solidify settlements and permanently disrupt tribal land practices in the face of backlash.

This Homestead Acts also resulted in tensions between settlers and indigenous people, partly due to settlers moving onto indigenous territory while it was still occupied. Settlements excused Indian removal and culminated in multiple wars waged by settler militia.Wilm, Julius (2020). ""The Indians Must Yield": Antebellum Free Land, The Homestead Act, and the Displacement of Native Peoples". German Historical Institute. 67 (2): 17–39.

Also involved in the acts were Buffalo soldiers, African-American soldiers who were key in building the American frontier in the West. They often engaged in wars with Native Americans, led by the government, to take over indigenous land.{{Cite web |title=Buffalo Soldiers |url=https://nmaahc.si.edu/explore/stories/buffalo-soldiers |access-date=2024-05-09 |website=National Museum of African American History and Culture |language=en}}

History

= Preemption Act of 1841 =

The Preemption Act of 1841 allowed settlers to claim up to 160 acres of federal land for themselves and prevent its sale to others including large landowners or corporations; they paid only a low fixed price of $1.25 per acre ($3.09 per hectare).{{Cite journal |date=2016-06-15 |title=1841, September 4 - 5 Stat. 453 - Preemption Act of 1841 |url=https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_usa_2_d/8 |journal=Constitution Society}} To qualify, a person had to be either 21 years old or a "head of household" (such as a parent or surviving sibling supporting a family), a citizen or an immigrant declaring to become a citizen, and a resident on that land for a minimum of 14 months. To get permanent title to the land, the person had to accomplish certain actions, such as continue to reside on it or improve it for at least five years; they could not leave or abandon it for more than six months at a time.Land Acts (2014). National Archives and Records Administration. [https://www.archives.gov/files/calendar/genealogy-fair/2014/handouts/session-11-handout-5of5-martinez-land-other-land-acts.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/calendar/genealogy-fair/2014/other-land-acts.pdf]

= Donation Land Claim Act of 1850 =

The Donation Land Claim Act allowed settlers to claim land in the Oregon Territory, then including the modern states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho and parts of Wyoming. The Oregon Donation Land Claim Act was passed in 1850 and allowed white settlers to claim 320 acres or 640 to married couples between 1850 and 1855 when the act was repealed. Before it was repealed in 1855, the land was sold for $1.25 per acre.{{cite web |title=Donation Land Claim Act, spur to American settlement of Oregon Territory, takes effect on September 27, 1850. |url=https://www.historylink.org/File/9501 |access-date=8 March 2021 |website=www.historylink.org}} After the creation of the Oregon territory in 1848, the US government had passed the most generous land distribution bill in US history.

The Oregon Land Donation Act of 1850 had many negative effects on Indigenous people as well as Black people in the Pacific Northwest. Not only did the act use the land taken away from the Indigenous people in the Pacific Northwest, but the act also barred Black citizens from owning land and real estate. The act guaranteed land for White settlers and "half-breed" Indian men to the Oregon territory.{{cite journal |author-last=Coleman |author-first=Kenneth R. |date=2019 |title="We'll All Start Even": White Egalitarianism and the Oregon Donation Land Claim Act |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.5403/oregonhistq.120.4.0414 |journal=Oregon Historical Quarterly |volume=120 |issue=4 |pages=414 |doi=10.5403/oregonhistq.120.4.0414 |s2cid=214402016 |issn=0030-4727}} This act followed the passing of the 1848 territorial organic act which allowed any white settler to claim a maximum of six hundred and forty acres.{{Cite journal |last=Bergquist |first=James M. |date=1957 |title=The Oregon Donation Act and the National Land Policy |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20612302 |journal=Oregon Historical Quarterly |volume=58 |issue=1 |pages=17–35 |jstor=20612302 |issn=0030-4727}} The Land Donation Act, however, also acknowledged women's property rights due to Congress allowing the donation of four hundred acres to settlers—land that could be claimed by heads of households—including women.{{cite journal |author-last=Chused |author-first=Richard H. |date=1984 |title=The Oregon Donation Act of 1850 and Nineteenth Century Federal Married Women's Property Law |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/743910 |journal=Law and History Review |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=44–78 |doi=10.2307/743910 |jstor=743910 |s2cid=146633518 |issn=0738-2480}} This act differed from the Homestead Act of 1866 due to the ineligibility of Black citizens from applying.{{cite book |author-last=Frymer |author-first=Paul |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1vxm7rr |title=Building an American Empire: The Era of Territorial and Political Expansion |date=2017 |publisher=Princeton University Press |doi=10.2307/j.ctt1vxm7rr |jstor=j.ctt1vxm7rr}}

= Homestead Act of 1862 =

File:Freeman homestead-certificate.jpg

The "yeoman farmer" ideal of Jeffersonian democracy was still a powerful influence in American politics during the 1840–1850s, with many politicians believing a homestead act would help increase the number of "virtuous yeomen". The Free Soil Party of 1848–52, and the new Republican Party after 1854, demanded that the new lands opening up in the west be made available to independent farmers, rather than wealthy planters who would develop it with the use of slaves forcing the yeomen farmers onto marginal lands.Eric Foner; Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil War; 1970. Southern Democrats had continually fought (and defeated) previous homestead law proposals, as they feared free land would attract European immigrants and poor Southern whites to the west.Charles C. Bolton; Poor Whites of the Antebellum South: Tenants and Laborers in Central North Carolina and Northeast Mississippi; 1993; p. 67.{{harvnb|Phillips|2000}}.{{page needed|date=January 2023}}{{harvnb|McPherson|1998|p=193}}.

The intent of the Homestead Act of 1862{{cite web |url=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Homestead_Act |title=Homestead Act}}{{cite web |url=http://www.nps.gov/home/historyculture/abouthomesteadactlaw.htm |title=About the Homestead Act |publisher=National Park Service |access-date=2012-06-29}} was to reduce the cost of homesteading under the Preemption Act; after the South seceded and their delegates left Congress in 1861, the Republicans and supporters from the upper South passed a homestead act signed by Abraham Lincoln on May 20, 1862, which went into effect on Jan. 1st, 1863.{{harvnb|McPherson|1998|pp=450–451}}.Hannah L. Anderson, 'That Settles It: The Debate and Consequences of the Homestead Act of 1862', The History Teacher 45.1 (2011), p. 101 Its leading advocates were Andrew Johnson,{{harvnb|Trefousse|1989|p=42}}. George Henry Evans,{{harvnb|McElroy|2001|p=1}}. and Horace Greeley.[http://www.tulane.edu/~latner/Greeley.html "Horace Greeley"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071217100524/http://www.tulane.edu/~latner/Greeley.html |date=December 17, 2007 }}; Tulane University; August 13, 1999; retrieved 11-22-2007 George Henry Evans famously coined the phrase "Vote Yourself a Farm" in a bid to garner support for the movement.Felix Rohayton, 'Five: The Homestead Act' in Bold Endeavours: How Our Government Built America, And Why It Must Rebuild Now (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009), p. 87

In addition to the previous requirement in the Preemption Act of being either 21 years old or the head of a family, the 1862 act also allowed for persons under 21 who had served in the regular or volunteer forces of the U.S. army or navy for at least 14 days during "the existence of an actual war domestic or foreign".

The new act also required that the person "has never borne arms against the United States Government or given aid and comfort to its enemies"; unlike the 1848 and 1850 laws, it did not have any provision mentioning race. The act insured adult U.S. citizens 160 acres of land from the government to "improve their plot by cultivating the land".{{Cite web |date=2021-07-29 |title=Homestead Act (1862) |url=https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/homestead-act |access-date=2023-01-16 |website=National Archives |language=en}}

The Homestead act expanded, rather than changed, the 1841 Preemption Act. The claimed homestead could include the same land which they had previously filed a preemption claim (on up to 160 acres at $1.25 per acre, or up to 80 acres of subdivided and surveyed land at $2.50 per acre), and they could expand their current ownership to contiguous adjacent land up to 160 acres total.

The homestead application must be "made for his or her exclusive use and benefit, and that said entry [onto public land] is made for the purpose of actual settlement and cultivation, and not either directly or indirectly for the use or benefit of any other person or persons whomsoever". The acquired land would not be liable for any debts incurred prior to the issuance of the patent for it.

The time requirement for residence or cultivation was set at 5 years; if it was proven "after due notice" that they moved residence or abandoned the land for more than six months at a time, then the land reverted to the government. A homesteader could also pay the $1.25 (or the current rate) per acre price after proof of the less-stringent requirements set in the Preemption Act.

After filing an affidavit with the government's agent, and paying him a $10 fee, the homesteader could begin occupying their claim. The government agent received the same fee for homestead land as he would have received if that land was sold for cash, 1/2 from the homesteader's filing fee and the other half from the patent (certificate) fee. The homesteader did not get a certificate or patent until they or their heirs filed, after 5 years (but before 7 years), further affidavits from two neighbors or "credible witnesses" and an additional $8 fee. Those affidavits affirmed the 5 years of residence or cultivation and that "no part of said land has been alienated [transferred or mortgaged], and that he [the homesteader] has borne true allegiance to the Government of the United States".

If both parents died and all the children were under 21, an executor under state law could sell (for the benefit of the children, and not the estate) an absolute title to the land within two years of the parent's death. The purchaser would pay office fees for a patent to the land.

= Southern Homestead Act of 1866 =

{{For|African Americans that settled in the West and the Midwest|Exodusters}}

The act was enacted to allow poor tenant farmers and sharecroppers in the South to become landowners in the Southern United States during Reconstruction. In the South, poor farmers and sharecroppers made up the majority of the population so the act sold land at a lower price to decrease poverty among the working class.Edwards, Richard. “African Americans and the Southern Homestead Act.” Great Plains Quarterly 39, no. 2 (2019): 103–30.

It was not very successful, as even the low prices and fees were often too much for the applicants to afford.Paul Wallace Gates, "Federal Land Policy in the South 1866-1888." Journal of Southern History (1940) 6#3 pp: 303-330. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2192139 in JSTOR] The land made available was also mostly undeveloped forestry, and only white people had the means to make them productive.{{Cite journal |last1=Muhammad |first1=Andrew |last2=Sichko |first2=Christopher |last3=Olsson |first3=Tore C. |date=March 2024 |title=African Americans and federal land policy: Exploring the Homestead Acts of 1862 and 1866 |journal=Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy |language=en |volume=46 |issue=1 |pages=95–110 |doi=10.1002/aepp.13401 |issn=2040-5790|doi-access=free }}

= Timber Culture Act of 1873 =

The Timber Culture Act granted up to 160 acres of land to a homesteader who would plant at least 40 acres (revised to 10) of trees over a period of several years. This quarter-section could be added to an existing homestead claim, offering a total of 320 acres to a settler.{{Cite web |last=Elkin |first=Rosetta |date=2023-11-30 |title=The Timber Culture Act |url=https://arboretum.harvard.edu/stories/the-timber-culture-act/ |access-date=2024-05-09 |website=Arnold Arboretum |language=en-us}}

= Indian Homestead Act of 1875 =

The 1862 Homestead Act did not include indigenous peoples, so Congress passed the Indian Homestead Act to give Native family heads the opportunity to purchase homesteads from unclaimed public lands. This was under the condition that the individual relinquished their tribal identity and relations, along with the land improvement requirements. The federal land title was not officially granted to Native Americans until a period of five years had passed.{{Cite book |last=Knack |first=Martha C. |title=State and Reservation: New Perspectives on Federal Indian Policy |date=1992 |publisher=University of Arizona Press |isbn=9780816545681 |editor-last= |editor-first= |pages=63–91 |chapter=Utah Indians and the Homestead Laws}}

Because the US government did not issue fee waivers, many poor non-reservation Natives were unable to pay filing fees to claim homesteads. Access to such homesteads was further complicated by delays in resolving border disputes due to distance and discord between the US Land Office and the Bureau of Indian Affairs.{{Cite journal |last=Deutsch |first=Herman J. |date=1956 |title=Indian and White in the Inland Empire: The Contest for the Land, 1880-1912 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40487178 |journal=The Pacific Northwest Quarterly |volume=47 |issue=2 |pages=44–51 |jstor=40487178 |issn=0030-8803}} This made white settlements easier to finalize.

= Kinkaid Amendment of 1904 =

Recognizing that the Sandhills of north-central Nebraska required more than 160 acres for a claimant to support a family, Congress passed the Kinkaid Act, which granted larger homestead tracts, up to 640 acres, to homesteaders in Nebraska.{{Cite journal |last=Reynolds |first=Arthur R. |date=1949 |title=The Kinkaid Act and Its Effects on Western Nebraska |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3739379 |journal=Agricultural History |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=20–29 |jstor=3739379 |issn=0002-1482}}

= Forest Homestead Act of 1906 =

This act allowed homesteads within Forest Reserves (created from 1891 on) and National Forests (from 1905? on), responding to opponents of the nation's Forest Reserves who felt land suited for agriculture was being withheld from private development. Homestead applications were reviewed by the U.S. Forest Service (created in 1905). While at first five years residency was required (per the 1862 Act), in 1913 this act was amended to allow proving up in just three years.{{cite web |url=https://coloradoencyclopedia.org/article/homestead |title=Homestead |date=November 10, 2015 |publisher=Colorado Encyclopedia |access-date=June 15, 2021}}

= Enlarged Homestead Act of 1909 =

Because by the early 1900s much of the prime low-lying alluvial land along rivers had been homesteaded, the Enlarged Homestead Act was passed in 1909. To enable dryland farming, it increased the number of acres for a homestead to {{convert|320|acre|ha}} given to farmers who accepted more marginal lands (especially in the Great Plains), which could not be easily irrigated.[http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/wo/Minerals Realty and Resource Protection /bmps.Par.41235.File.dat/Split%20Estate%20Presentation%202006.pdf Split EstatePrivate Surface / Public Minerals: What Does it Mean to You?]{{dead link|date=November 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, a 2006 Bureau of Land Management presentation

A massive influx of these new farmers, combined with inappropriate cultivation techniques and misunderstanding of the ecology, led to immense land erosion and eventually the Dust Bowl of the 1930s.{{cite SSRN | last1=Libecap |first1=Gary D. |last2=Hansen |first2=Zeynep K. |title=U.S. Land Policy, Property Rights, and the Dust Bowl of the 1930s |language=en |date=September 1, 2001|ssrn=286699 }}{{cite web |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/dustbowl-drought/ |title=The American Experience: Drought |publisher=pbs.org |access-date=February 3, 2016}}

= Stock-Raising Homestead Act of 1916 =

In 1916, the Stock-Raising Homestead Act was passed for settlers seeking {{convert|640|acre}} of public land for ranching purposes.

= Subsistence Homesteads provisions under the New Deal – 1930s =

File:Wonder Valley Homestead Cabin.jpeg]]

Renewed interest in homesteading was brought about by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt's program of Subsistence Homesteading implemented in the 1930s under the New Deal.

== Small Tracts Act ==

In 1938 Congress passed a law, called the Small Tract Act (STA) of 1938, by which it is possible for any citizen to obtain certain lands from the Federal Government for residence, recreation, or business purposes. These tracts may not usually be larger than 5 acres. A 5-acre tract would be one which is 660 feet long and 330 feet wide, or its equivalent. The property was to be improved with a building. Starting July 1955, improvement was required to be minimum of 400 sq. feet of space.{{cite web |url=https://publicland.org/plf-archives/35_archives/documents/doc_1306_bellesi.html |title=BLM and the Small Tract Act in the Southern California Desert – A Brief History |author=Lou Bellesi |access-date=July 29, 2018}} 4,000 previously classified Small Tracts were offered at public auction at fair market value, circa 1958, by the Los Angeles Office of BLM.

In practice

Settlers found land and filed their claims at the regional land office, usually in individual family units, although others formed closer-knit communities. Often, the homestead consisted of several buildings or structures besides the main house.

The Homestead Act of 1862 gave rise later to a new phenomenon, large land rushes, such as the Oklahoma Land Runs of the 1880s and 90s.

End under Federal Land Policy and Management Act

File:Dugout home2.jpg home from a homestead near Pie Town, New Mexico, 1940]]

The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 ended homesteading;{{cite web |url=http://www.netside.net/~c3i/act.htm |title=The Florida Homestead Act of 1862 |year=2006 |access-date=November 22, 2007 |publisher=Florida Homestead Services |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080109103320/http://www.netside.net/~c3i/act.htm |archive-date=January 9, 2008 |url-status=dead}} (paragraphs.3,6&13) (Includes data on the U.S. Homestead Act){{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-3xliUQx6boC&q=end+homesteading&pg=PA21 |title=Arctic Homestead: The True Story of a Family's Survival and Courage.... |first=Norma |last=Cobb |publisher=St. Martin's Press |year=2000 |access-date=November 22, 2007 |isbn=978-0-312-28379-7 |pages=21}} by that time, federal government policy had shifted to retaining control of western public lands. The only exception to this new policy was in Alaska, for which the law allowed homesteading until 1986.

Elizabeth (Betty) Clouse-Smith was the last woman homesteader to successfully prove up land in her own name. She was among a group of people, including her son William J. Smith, who filed for homestead west of Big Delta, Alaska. On October 18, 1984, she received a patent for her {{convert|116|acre||adj=mid| claim}}.{{Cite news |last=Lange-Kubick |first=Cindy |date=2012-04-29 |title=Nation's last woman homesteader once called Nebraska home |url=https://journalstar.com/article_05005893-64b9-5d53-9984-43b420d753be.html |access-date=2025-01-16 |work=Lincoln Journal Star |language=en}}

The last claim under this Act was made by Ken Deardorff for {{convert|80|acre|ha}} of land on the Stony River in southwestern Alaska. He fulfilled all requirements of the homestead act in 1979 but did not receive his deed until May 1988. He is the last person to receive a title to land claimed under the Homestead Acts.{{cite web |url=http://www.nps.gov/home/historyculture/lasthomesteader.htm |title=The Last Homesteader |publisher=National Park Service |year=2006 |access-date=November 22, 2007}}

Issues and concerns

The Homestead Acts were sometimes abused, but historians continue to debate the extent.Richard Edwards, "Changing perceptions of homesteading as a policy of public domain disposal." Great Plains Quarterly 29.3 (2009): 179-202 [https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2228&context=greatplainsquarterly online].Richard Edwards, Jacob K. Friefeld, and Rebecca S. Wingo, eds. Homesteading the Plains: Toward a New History (2017) p 13. In the 1950s and 1960s, historians Fred Shannon, Roy Robbins, and Paul Wallace Gates emphasized fraudulent episodes, and historians largely turned away from the issue. In recent decades, however, the argument has mostly been that on the whole fraud was a relatively minor element and that strongly positive impacts regarding women and the family have only recently been appreciated.Richard Edwards, "Invited Essay: The New Learning about Homesteading." Great Plains Quarterly 38.1 (2018): 1-23. Robert Higgs argues that the Homestead Act induced no long-term misallocation of resources.Robert Higgs, The Transformation of the American Economy, 1865–1914 (1971), p. 92. In 1995, a random survey of 178 members of the Economic History Association found that 70 percent of economists and 84 percent of economic historians disagreed with the statement "Nineteenth-century U.S. land policy, which attempted to give away free land, probably represented a net drain on the productive capacity of the country."{{cite journal |last=Whaples |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Whaples |journal=The Journal of Economic History |volume=55 |issue=1 |pages=139–154 |jstor=2123771 |title=Where is There Consensus Among American Economic Historians? The Results of a Survey on Forty Propositions |date=March 1995 |doi=10.1017/S0022050700040602 |citeseerx=10.1.1.482.4975 |s2cid=145691938 |url=http://www.employees.csbsju.edu/jolson/econ315/whaples2123771.pdf}}

Some scholars{{who|date=June 2022}} believe the acreage limits were reasonable when the act was written but argue that no one understood the physical conditions of the plains. After a few generations, a family could build up a sizable estate.Hansen, Zeynep K., and Gary D. Libecap. [https://ssrn.com/abstract=460622 "Small Farms, Externalities, and the Dust Bowl of the 1930s"], Journal of Political Economy, Volume: 112(3). – pp.665–94. – 21 November 2003

According to Hugh Nibley, much of the rainforest west of Portland, Oregon, was acquired by the Oregon Lumber Company by illegal claims under the Act.See Nibley, Hugh. Approaching Zion (The Collected Works of Hugh Nibley, Vol 9), p. 469. Nibley's grandfather, Charles W. Nibley made his fortune in Oregon lumber, among other resources.

= Racism =

Several additional laws were enacted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to address the concerns of African Americans. The Southern Homestead Act of 1866 sought to address land ownership inequalities in the south during Reconstruction. It explicitly included Black Americans and encouraged them to participate, and, although rampant discrimination, systemic barriers, and bureaucratic inertia considerably slowed Black gains,{{cite book |last=Frymer |first=Paul |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1vxm7rr |title=Building an American Empire: The Era of Territorial and Political Expansion |date=2017 |publisher=Princeton University Press |doi=10.2307/j.ctt1vxm7rr |jstor=j.ctt1vxm7rr}} the 1866 law was part of the reason that within a generation after its passage, by 1900, one quarter of all Southern Black farmers were farm owners.{{cite book |author1=Melvin L. Oliver |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_ZUtb3FkddoC&pg=PA15 |title=Black Wealth/white Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality |author2=Thomas M. Shapiro |publisher=Psychology Press |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-415-91847-3 |pages=14–15}} Later Homestead acts only marginally benefited African Americans.{{Cite web |title=African American Homesteaders in the Great Plains (U.S. National Park Service) |url=https://www.nps.gov/articles/african-american-homesteaders-in-the-great-plains.htm |access-date=2024-10-22 |website=www.nps.gov |language=en}}

Related acts in other countries

= Canada =

Similar laws were passed in Canada:

The Legislative Assembly of Ontario passed The Free Grants and Homestead Act in 1868,{{cite canlaw | short title=The Free Grants and Homestead Act of 1868 |abbr=S.O. |year=1868 |chapter=8 |link=https://books.google.com/books?id=-GiuAAAAMAAJ&lpg=PR1&pg=PA72}} which introduced a conditional scheme to an existing free grant plan previously authorized by the Province of Canada in The Public Lands Act of 1860.{{cite canlaw |short title=The Public Lands Act of 1860 |abbr=S.C. |year=1860 |chapter=2 |link=https://archive.org/stream/statutesprovinc00canagoog#page/n12/mode/2up}} It was extended to include settlement in the Rainy River District under The Rainy River Free Grants and Homestead Act, 1886,{{cite canlaw |short title=The Rainy River Free Grants and Homestead Act, 1886 |abbr=S.O. |year=1886 |chapter=7 |link=https://archive.org/stream/statutesofprovin1886onta#page/22/mode/2up}} These Acts were consolidated in 1913 in The Public Lands Act,{{cite canlaw |short title=The Public Lands Act |abbr=S.O. |year=1913 |chapter=6 |part=II |link=https://archive.org/stream/statutesofprovin1913onta#page/42/mode/2up}} which was further extended in 1948 to provide for free grants to former members of the Canadian Forces.{{cite canlaw | short title =The Public Lands Amendment Act, 1948 |abbr=S.O. |year=1948 |chapter=72 |section=2 |link=https://archive.org/stream/statutesofprovin1948onta#page/400/mode/2up}} The original free grant provisions for settlers were repealed in 1951,{{cite canlaw |short title=The Public Lands Amendment Act, 1951 |abbr=S.O. |year=1951 |chapter=71 |section=1 |link=https://archive.org/stream/statutesofprovin1951onta#page/350/mode/2up}} and the remaining provisions were repealed in 1961.{{cite canlaw |short title=The Public Lands Amendment Act, 1960–61 |abbr=S.O. |year=1960-61 |chapter=71 |section=3 |link=https://archive.org/stream/statutesofprov196061onta#page/310/mode/2up}}

The Parliament of Canada passed the Dominion Lands Act in 1872 in order to encourage settlement in the Northwest Territories. Its application was restricted after the passage of the Natural Resources Acts in 1930, and it was finally repealed in 1950.

The Legislative Assembly of Quebec did not expand the scope of the 1860 Province of Canada Act (which modern day Quebec was part of in 1860), but did provide in 1868 that such lands were exempt from seizure, and chattels thereon were also exempt for the first ten years of occupation.{{cite canlaw |short title=An Act to Encourage Settlers |abbr=S.Q. |year=1868 |chapter=20 |link=http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b4775905;view=1up;seq=105}} Later known as the Settlers Protection Act,{{cite canlaw |short title=Settlers Protection Act |abbr=L.R.Q. |year= |chapter=P-38 |link=http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/documents/lr/P_38/P38_A.htm}} it was repealed in 1984.{{cite canlaw |short title=Loi sur les terres publiques agricoles |abbr=L.Q. |year=1982 |chapter=13 |link=http://www.bibliotheque.assnat.qc.ca/DepotNumerique_v2/AffichageFichier.aspx?idf=94450}}{{in lang|fr}}

Newfoundland and Labrador provided for free grants of land upon proof of possession for twenty years prior to 1977, with continuous use for agricultural, business or residential purposes during that time.{{cite canlaw |short title=Lands Act |abbr=S.N.L. |year=1991 |chapter=36 |section=36 |link=http://www.assembly.nl.ca/Legislation/sr/statutes/l3691.htm#36_}}, discussed at {{cite web |title=Squatter's Rights |url=http://www.env.gov.nl.ca/env/lands/ownership/squatters.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110515201605/http://www.env.gov.nl.ca/env/lands/ownership/squatters.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2011-05-15 |publisher=NL Department of Environment and Conservation}} Similar programs continued to operate in Alberta and British Columbia until 1970. In the early 21st century, some land is still being granted in the Yukon Territory under its Agricultural Lands Program.{{cite news |author=Tristin Hopper |title=Canada's Last Homesteaders: How Determined Pioneers Turn the Yukon's Wild Crown Land Into Successful Farms |url=https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadas-last-homesteaders-how-determined-pioneers-turn-the-yukons-wild-crown-land-into-successful-farms |date=February 14, 2014 |newspaper=The National Post |access-date=March 27, 2022}}

= New Zealand =

Despite the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi provisions for sale of land, the Māori Land Court decided that all land not cultivated by Māori was 'waste land' and belonged to the Crown without purchase.{{cite web |title=1. – Land ownership – Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand |url=http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/land-ownership/page-1 |website=www.teara.govt.nz |access-date=2016-01-13 |author=New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage Te Manatu Taonga}} Most provinces in colonial New Zealand had Waste Lands Acts enacted between 1854 and 1877. The 1874 Waste Lands Act in Auckland Province used the term Homestead, with allocation administered by a Crown Lands Board.{{cite web |title=Auckland Waste Lands Act 1874 (38 Victoriae 1874 No 16) |url=http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/awla187438v1874n16308/ |access-date=2021-03-06 |website=www.nzlii.org}}{{cite web |title=Provincial District of Auckland — The Land Act, 1877 {{!}} NZETC |url=http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-Stout44-t5-body-d14.html |website=nzetc.victoria.ac.nz |access-date=2016-01-13}} There was similar legislation in Westland.{{cite web |title=3. – Land ownership – Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand |url=http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/land-ownership/page-3 |website=www.teara.govt.nz |access-date=2016-01-13 |author=New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage Te Manatu Taonga}} It gave up to {{Convert|75|acre|ha|abbr = on}}, with settlers just paying the cost of a survey. They had to live there for five years, build a house and cultivate a third of the land, if already open, or a fifth if bush had to be cleared.{{cite web |title=Crown Lands Guide {{!}} NZETC |url=http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-Stout64-t18-body-d51.html |website=nzetc.victoria.ac.nz |access-date=2016-01-13}} The land was forfeited if they didn't clear enough bush. Further amendments were made in 1877, 1882 and 1885, adding details such as pastoral and perpetual leases and village and special settlements.{{cite web |last=Taonga |first=New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage Te Manatu |title=Centralisation after 1870 |url=https://teara.govt.nz/en/land-ownership/page-4 |access-date=2021-03-06 |website=teara.govt.nz |language=en}} This contributed to rapid deforestation.{{cite web |last=Pond |first=Wendy |date=May 1997 |title=The Land with All Woods and Waters |url=https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/wt-theme-u-land-with-all-woods-and-waters.pdf |url-status=dead |website=WAITANGI TRIBUNAL |access-date=June 17, 2021 |archive-date=August 13, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210813190537/https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/wt-theme-u-land-with-all-woods-and-waters.pdf }}

In popular culture

Laura Ingalls Wilder's Little House on the Prairie series describes her father and family claiming a homestead in Kansas, and later Dakota Territory. Wilder's daughter Rose Wilder Lane published a novel, Free Land, which describes the trials of homesteaders in what is now South Dakota.
Willa Cather's novels O Pioneers! and My Ántonia feature families homesteading on the Great Plains.
Oscar Micheaux's novel The Homesteader: a Novel (1917) is a semi-autobiographical story of an African American homesteader in South Dakota shortly after the turn of the 20th century.
The Rodgers and Hammerstein musical Oklahoma! is based in the Oklahoma land rush.
The 1962 Elvis Presley musical film Follow That Dream, adapted from Pioneer, Go Home! (1959), features a family that homesteads in Florida.
The movie Far and Away, starring Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, centers on the main characters' struggle to "obtain their 160 acres."
The miniseries Centennial depicts the homestead development of an eastern Colorado town.
The 1953 movie Shane depicts some early homesteaders in Wyoming opposed by a cattle baron who abuses, threatens and terrorizes them, calling them "pig farmers," "sod-busters," "squatters" and other taunts and insults. When the rancher gets violent, the homesteaders are divided over whether to leave or to hold onto their claims. A drifter working on one of the homesteads reluctantly tries to take action.
The 2016 film The Magnificent Seven, loosely adapted from the 1960 film of the same name, features Sam Chisolm, an African American U.S. Marshal raised on a homestead in Lincoln, Kansas. His family had been lynched in 1867 by former Confederate Army soldiers, hired by a robber baron to drive off settlers and free up real estate on the American frontier.

Notes

References

{{cite web |url=http://www.fff.org/freedom/0501e.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20021107160515/http://www.fff.org/freedom/0501e.asp |url-status=dead |archive-date=November 7, 2002 |title=The Free-Soil Movement, Part 1 |publisher=The Future of Freedom Foundation |first1=Wendy |last1=McElroy |year=2001 |access-date=November 22, 2007}}
{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-uuEA7xIUHUC&q=southern+opposition+homesteading&pg=PA194 |title=Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era |first1=James M. |last1=McPherson |author-link=James M. McPherson |year=1998 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-516895-2 |pages=193–195}}
{{cite journal |last1=Phillips |first1=Sarah |title=Antebellum Agricultural Reform, Republican Ideology, and Sectional Tension |journal=Agricultural History |year=2000 |volume=74 |issue=4 |pages=799–822 |doi=10.1215/00021482-74.4.799 |s2cid=147839658 |issn=0002-1482 |language=en}}
{{cite book |last=Trefousse |first=Hans L. |title=Andrew Johnson: A Biography |year=1989 |isbn=978-0-393-31742-8 |publisher=Norton |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/andrewjohnson00hans}}

External links

[https://web.archive.org/web/20150413205616/http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/wo/Law_Enforcement/nlcs/education__interpretation/homestead_graphics0.Par.57736.File.dat/Expanded%20Homestead%20Timeline%20final.pdf U.S. Bureau of Land Management Homesteading Timeline]
[https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Homestead.html Homestead Act]. – Library of Congress
[http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=31&page=transcript Text of 1862 Homestead Act]
[https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/homestead-act/index.html Homestead Act of 1862]. – National Archives and Records Administration
[https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/homesteading/ Land Acquisition and Dispossession: Mapping the Homestead Act, 1863–1912] – interactive web map.
[http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/67hornbek/q.htm "Adeline Hornbek and the Homestead Act: A Colorado Success Story"]. – National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places (TwHP) lesson plan. – National Park Service
[http://content.lib.washington.edu/cmpweb/exhibits/homesteading/index.html Homesteaders and Pioneers on the Olympic Peninsula] – an exhibit from the University of Washington Library