Immaculate Conception#Dogmatic definition

{{Main|Original sin}}

Anne, the mother of Mary, first appears in the 2nd-century apocryphal Gospel of James. The author of the gospel borrowed from Greek tales of the childhood of heroes. For Jesus' grandmother the author drew on the more benign biblical story of Hannah—hence Anna—who conceived Samuel in her old age, thus reprising the miraculous birth of Jesus with a merely remarkable one for his mother.{{sfn|Nixon|2004|p=11}} Anne and her husband, Joachim, are infertile, but God hears their prayers and Mary is conceived.{{sfn|Nixon|2004|pp=11–12}} According to Stephen J. Shoemaker, within the Gospel of James, the conception occurs without sexual intercourse between Anne and Joachim, which fits well with the Gospel of James' persistent emphasis on Mary's sacred purity, but the story does not advance the idea of an immaculate conception.{{sfn|Shoemaker|2016|p=57}} The author of the Gospel of James may have based this account of Mary's conception on that of John the Baptist as recounted in the Gospel of Luke.{{cite book|url=https://archpitt.org/the-immaculate-conception-the-conception-of-st-anne-when-she-conceived-the-holy-mother-of-god-according-to-the-ruthenian-tradition/|title=The Immaculate Conception: The Conception of St Anne 'When She Conceived the Holy Mother of God' According to the Ruthenian Tradition|series=Byzantine Leaflet Series|publisher=Byzantine Catholic Archeparchy of Pittsburgh|access-date=6 December 2022}} The Eastern Orthodox Church holds that "Mary is conceived by her parents as we are all conceived".{{Cite web |url=http://ww1.antiochian.org/node/18597 |title=Hopko, Thomas. The Winter Pascha Chapter 9, Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America |access-date=May 7, 2022 |archive-date=March 2, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210302142848/http://ww1.antiochian.org/node/18597 |url-status=dead }}

According to church historian Frederick Holweck, writing in the Catholic Encyclopedia, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, and Cyril of Jerusalem developed the idea of Mary as the New Eve, drawing comparison to Eve, while yet immaculate and incorrupt{{snd}}that is to say, not subject to original sin. Holweck adds that Ephrem the Syrian said she was as innocent as Eve before the Fall.{{citation-attribution|[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm Holweck, Frederick. "Immaculate Conception." The Catholic Encyclopedia] Vol. 7. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. 11 May 2022}}{{cite book|author=Mark Miravalle|quote=You and your mother are the only ones who are immune from all stain; for there is no spot in Thee, O Lord, not any taint in your mother.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JXy9AQAAQBAJ&pg=PA32|page=32|title=Meet Mary Getting to Know the Mother of God|year=2007|publisher=Sophia Institute Press|isbn=9781933184326|oclc=177062079}}

Ambrose asserted Mary's incorruptibility, attributing her virginity to grace and immunity from sin. Severus, Bishop of Antioch, concurred affirming Mary's purity and immaculateness.{{cite web |author=Mark Miravalle |date=December 8, 2021 |title=What is the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception? |url=https://catholicexchange.com/what-is-the-dogma-of-the-immaculate-conception/}} John Damascene extended the supernatural influence of God to Mary's parents, suggesting they were purified by the Holy Spirit during her generation. According to Damascene, even the material of Mary's origin was deemed pure and holy. This perspective, which emphasized an immaculate active generation and the sanctity of the conceptio carnis, found resonance among some Western authors. Notably, the Greek Fathers did not explicitly discuss the Immaculate Conception.

File:Lusenberg-Immaculata-1876.jpg, 1876, representing Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception, at Saint Antony's Church, Urtijëi, Italy]]

By the 4th century the idea that Mary was free from sin was generally more widespread,{{sfn|Shoemaker|2016|p=119}} but original sin raised the question of whether she was also free of the sin passed down from Adam.{{sfn|Coyle|1996|pp=36–37}} The question became acute when the feast of her conception began to be celebrated in England in the 11th century,{{sfn|Collinge|2012|pp=209–210}} and the opponents of the feast of Mary's conception brought forth the objection that as sexual intercourse is sinful, to celebrate Mary's conception was to celebrate a sinful event.{{sfn|Boss|2000|p=126}} The feast of Mary's conception originated in the Eastern Church in the 7th century, reached England in the 11th, and from there spread to Europe, where it was given official approval in 1477 and extended to the whole church in 1693; the word "immaculate" was not officially added to the name of the feast until 1854.{{sfn|Collinge|2012|pp=209–210}}

The doctrine of the Immaculate Conception caused a virtual civil war between Franciscans and Dominicans during the Middle Ages, with Franciscan 'Scotists' in its favour and Dominican 'Thomists' against it.{{sfn|Cameron|1996|p=335}}{{sfn|Kappes|2014|p=13}} The English ecclesiastic and scholar Eadmer ({{Circa|1060|1126}}) reasoned that it was possible that Mary was conceived without original sin in view of God's omnipotence, and that it was also appropriate in view of her role as Mother of God: Potuit, decuit, fecit, "it was possible, it was fitting, therefore it was done".{{sfn|Coyle|1996|pp=36–37}} Others, including Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153) and Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), objected that if Mary were free of original sin at her conception then she would have no need of redemption, making Christ's saving redemption superfluous; they were answered by Duns Scotus (1264–1308), who "developed the idea of preservative redemption as being a more perfect one: to have been preserved free from original sin was a greater grace than to be set free from sin".{{sfn|Coyle|1996|p=38}}

In 1439, the Council of Basel, in schism with Pope Eugene IV who resided at the Council of Florence,{{sfn|Kappes|2014|pp=158–159}} declared the Immaculate Conception a "pious opinion" consistent with faith and Scripture; the Council of Trent, held in several sessions in the early 1500s, made no explicit declaration on the subject but exempted her from the universality of original sin; and also affirmed that she remained during all her life free from all stain of sin, even the venial one.;Council of Trent, DG 1573. As quoted in {{cite web|author=John Paul II|title=General Audience of 19th June 1996|url=https://www-vatican-va.translate.goog/content/john-paul-ii/it/audiences/1996/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_19960619.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=it&_x_tr_pto=wapp}} (at n°. 2) by 1571 the revised Roman Breviary set out an elaborate celebration of the Feast of the Immaculate Conception on 8 December.{{sfn|Reynolds|2012|pp=4–5, 117}}

According to Patrizia Granziera, the creation of the dogma was slow and elaborate and it was more the fruit of popular devotion than scholarly.{{sfn|Granziera|2019|p=469}} The Immaculate Conception became a popular subject in literature and art,{{sfn|Twomey|2008|p=ix}} and some devotees went so far as to hold that Anne had conceived Mary by kissing her husband Joachim, and that Anne's father and grandmother had likewise been conceived without sexual intercourse, although Bridget of Sweden ({{Circa|1303}}–1373) told how Mary herself had revealed to her that Anne and Joachim conceived their daughter through a sexual union which was sinless because it was pure and free of sexual lust.{{sfn|Solberg|2018|pp=108–109}}

In the 16th and especially the 17th centuries there was a proliferation of Immaculatist devotion in Spain, leading the Habsburg monarchs to demand that the papacy elevate the belief to the status of dogma.{{sfn|Hernández|2019|p=6}} In France in 1830 Catherine Labouré (May 2, 1806 – December 31, 1876) saw a vision of Mary standing on a globe while a voice commanded her to have a medal made in imitation of what she saw.{{sfn|Mack|2003}} The medal said "O Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee", which was a confirmation from Mary herself that she was conceived without sin. Labouré's vision marked the beginning of a great 19th-century Marian revival.{{sfn|Foley|2002|p=29}}

In 1849 Pope Pius IX issued the encyclical Ubi primum soliciting the bishops of the church for their views on whether the doctrine should be defined as dogma; ninety percent of those who responded were supportive, although the Archbishop of Paris, Marie-Dominique-Auguste Sibour, warned that the Immaculate Conception "could be proved neither from the Scriptures nor from tradition".{{sfn|Schaff|1931|p=unpaginated}} In 1854 the Immaculate Conception dogma was proclaimed with the bull Ineffabilis Deus.{{sfn|Foley|2002|p=153}}{{sfn|Collinge|2012|p=209}}

We declare, pronounce, and define that the doctrine which holds that the most Blessed Virgin Mary, in the first instance of her conception, by a singular grace and privilege granted by Almighty God, in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the human race, was preserved free from all stain of original sin, is a doctrine revealed by God and therefore to be believed firmly and constantly by all the faithful.{{sfn|Sheed|1958|pp=134–138}}

Dom Prosper Guéranger, Abbot of Solesmes Abbey, who had been one of the main promoters of the dogmatic statement, wrote Mémoire sur l'Immaculée Conception, explaining what he saw as its basis:

For the belief to be defined as a dogma of faith [...] it is necessary that the Immaculate Conception form part of Revelation, expressed in Scripture or Tradition, or be implied in beliefs previously defined. Needed, afterward, is that it be proposed to the faith of the faithful through the teaching of the ordinary magisterium. Finally, it is necessary that it be attested by the liturgy, and the Fathers and Doctors of the Church.[https://www.catholic.org/featured/headline.php?ID=1593 "How Abbot of Solesmes Explained the Immaculate Conception", Zenit, December 9, 2004]

File:Virgilio Tojetti 1877 Our Lady of Lourdes.jpg's 9th apparition, 25 February 1858, by Virgilio Tojett (1877), after Bernadette Soubirous' description.{{Cite web |date=2014-04-08 |title=Virgilio Tojetti – Adoration of the Virgin Mary in the Grotto at Massabielle near Lourdes – Dorotheum |url=https://www.dorotheum.com/en/l/3900127/,%20https://www.dorotheum.com/en/l/3900127/ |access-date=2022-07-12 |website=www.dorotheum.com |language=en-GB}} Soubirous claimed the Lady identified herself as the "Immaculate Conception".]]

Guéranger maintained that these conditions were met and that the definition was therefore possible. Ineffabilis Deus found the Immaculate Conception in the Ark of Salvation (Noah's Ark), Jacob's Ladder, the Burning Bush at Sinai, the Enclosed Garden from the Song of Songs, and many more passages.{{sfn|Manelli|2008|p=35}} From this wealth of support the pope's advisors singled out Genesis 3:15: "The most glorious Virgin ... was foretold by God when he said to the serpent: 'I will put enmity between you and the woman,{{' "}}{{sfn|Manelli|1994|pp=6–7}} a prophecy which reached fulfilment in the figure of the Woman in the Revelation of John, crowned with stars and trampling the Dragon underfoot.{{sfn|Twomey|2008|pp=73–74}} Luke 1:28, and specifically the phrase "full of grace" by which Gabriel greeted Mary, was another reference to her Immaculate Conception: "she was never subject to the curse and was, together with her Son, the only partaker of perpetual benediction".{{sfn|German|2001|p=596}}

Ineffabilis Deus was one of the pivotal events of the papacy of Pius, pope from 16 June 1846 to his death on 7 February 1878.{{sfn|Hillerbrand|2012|p=250}} Four years after the proclamation of the dogma, in 1858, the young Bernadette Soubirous said that Mary appeared to her at Lourdes in southern France, to announce that she was the Immaculate Conception; the Catholic Church later endorsed the apparition as authentic.{{sfn|Hammond|2003|p=602}} There are other (approved) Marian apparitions in which Mary identified herself as the Immaculate Conception, for example Our Lady of Gietrzwald in 1877, Poland.{{cite journal |last=Dabrowski |first=P.M. |date=2013 |title=Multiple visions, multiple viewpoints: apparitions in a Polish-German borderland, 1877–1880 |journal=The Polish Review |volume=58 |issue=3 |pages=35–64 |doi=10.5406/polishreview.58.3.0035|jstor=10.5406/polishreview.58.3.0035 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/polishreview.58.3.0035}}

File:Quadrittu (cropped).jpg, Sicily]]

{{Main|Feast of the Immaculate Conception|Patronages of the Immaculate Conception}}

The feast day of the Immaculate Conception is December 8.{{sfn|Barrely|2014|p=40}} The Roman Missal and the Roman Rite Liturgy of the Hours include references to Mary's immaculate conception in the feast of the Immaculate Conception. Its celebration seems to have begun in the Eastern church in the 7th century and may have spread to Ireland by the 8th, although the earliest well-attested record in the Western church is from England early in the 11th.{{sfn|Boss|2000|p=124}} It was suppressed there after the Norman Conquest (1066), and the first thorough exposition of the doctrine was a response to this suppression.{{sfn|Boss|2000|p=124}} It continued to spread through the 15th century despite accusations of heresy from the Thomists and strong objections from several prominent theologians.{{sfn|Boss|2000|p=128}}

Beginning around 1140 Bernard of Clairvaux, a Cistercian monk, wrote to Lyons Cathedral to express his surprise and dissatisfaction that it had recently begun to be observed there,{{sfn|Boss|2000|p=126}} but in 1477 Pope Sixtus IV, a Franciscan Scotist and devoted Immaculist, placed it on the Roman calendar (i.e., list of church festivals and observances) via the bull Cum praexcelsa.{{sfn|Manelli|2008|p=643}} Thereafter in 1481 and 1483, in response to the polemic writings of the prominent Thomist, Vincenzo Bandello, Pope Sixtus IV published two more bulls which forbade anybody to preach or teach against the Immaculate Conception, or for either side to accuse the other of heresy, on pains of excommunication.

Pope Pius V kept the feast on the tridentine calendar but suppressed the word "immaculate".{{sfn|Hernández|2019|p=38}} Gregory XV in 1622 prohibited any public or private assertion that Mary was conceived in sin. Urban VIII in 1624 allowed the Franciscans to establish a military order dedicated to the Virgin of the Immaculate Conception.{{sfn|Hernández|2019|p=38}} Following the promulgation of Ineffabilis Deus the typically Franciscan phrase "immaculate conception" reasserted itself in the title and euchology (prayer formulae) of the feast. Pius IX solemnly promulgated a mass formulary drawn chiefly from one composed 400 years by a papal chamberlain at the behest of Sixtus IV, beginning "O God who by the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin".{{sfn|Manelli|2008|pp=643–644}}

File:La Inmaculada Concepción de Ciudad de Batangas 2024-06-29.jpg, Philippines, pontifically crowned on December 8, 2022]]

The Roman Rite liturgical books, including the Roman Missal and the Liturgy of the Hours, included offices venerating Mary's immaculate conception on the feast of the Immaculate Conception. An example is the antiphon that begins: "Tota pulchra es, Maria, et macula originalis non est in te" ("You are all beautiful, Mary, and the original stain [of sin] is not in you". It continues: "Your clothing is white as snow, and your face is like the sun. You are all beautiful, Mary, and the original stain [of sin] is not in you. You are the glory of Jerusalem, you are the joy of Israel, you give honour to our people. You are all beautiful, Mary".)The text (in Latin) is given at [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQh0jLR2Iks Tota Pulchra Es – GMEA Honor Chorus.] On the basis of the original Gregorian chant music,{{cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-uJEr669ts| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/N-uJEr669ts| archive-date=2021-12-11 | url-status=live|title=Tota pulchra es Maria, Canto gregoriano nella devozione mariana, studio di Giovanni Vianini, Milano|date=November 6, 2008|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}} polyphonic settings have been composed by Anton Bruckner,{{cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k23PLEuG-h8| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/k23PLEuG-h8| archive-date=2021-12-11 | url-status=live|title=Anton Bruckner – Tota pulchra es|date=October 3, 2008|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}} Pablo Casals, Maurice Duruflé,{{cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhmVu7xgpBc| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/DhmVu7xgpBc| archive-date=2021-12-11 | url-status=live|title=Maurice Duruflé: Tota pulchra es Maria|date=May 23, 2010|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}} Grzegorz Gerwazy Gorczycki,{{cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaqFtF2HDTk| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/aaqFtF2HDTk| archive-date=2021-12-11 | url-status=live|title=Tota pulchra es – Grzegorz Gerwazy Gorczycki|date=June 17, 2011|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}} Ola Gjeilo,{{cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DKooq6HWDI| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/3DKooq6HWDI| archive-date=2021-12-11 | url-status=live|title=TOTA PULCHRA ES GREX VOCALIS|date=May 21, 2009|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}} José Maurício Nunes Garcia,{{cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVH0fkNY-xA| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/gVH0fkNY-xA| archive-date=2021-12-11 | url-status=live|title=Tota pulchra es, Maria Canto gregoriano nella devozione mariana|date=September 21, 2008|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}} and {{ill|Nikolaus Schapfl|de}}.{{cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0KizZtM9-c| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/a0KizZtM9-c| archive-date=2021-12-11 | url-status=live|title=Tota Pulchra – Composed by Nikolaus Schapfl (*1963)|date=January 4, 2010|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}}

Other prayers honouring Mary's immaculate conception are in use outside the formal liturgy. The Immaculata prayer, composed by Maximillian Kolbe, is a prayer of entrustment to Mary as the Immaculata.{{cite web|url=http://campus.udayton.edu/mary//prayers/consec01.html#2|title=Prayers of Consecration|access-date=December 7, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081211015531/http://campus.udayton.edu/mary/prayers/consec01.html#2|archive-date=December 11, 2008|url-status=dead}} A novena of prayers, with a specific prayer for each of the nine days has been composed under the title of the Immaculate Conception Novena.{{cite web|url=http://www.ewtn.com/Devotionals/novena/immaculate.htm|title=Nine Days Of Prayer – Immaculate Conception}}

Ave Maris Stella is the vesper hymn of the feast of the Immaculate Conception.Sutfin, Edward J., True Christmas Spirit, Grail Publications, St. Meinrad, Indiana, 1955 The hymn Immaculate Mary, addressed to Mary as the Immaculately Conceived One, is closely associated with Lourdes.{{cite web|url=http://www.churchyear.net/icprayers.html|title=Immaculate Conception Prayers}}

The Loreto Litanies included the official Latin Marian title of Regina sine labe originali concepta (Queen conceived without original sin), which had been granted by Pope Gregory XVI (1831-1846) from 1839 onwards to some dioceses, thus several years before the proclamation of the dogma.{{cite book|author=Giuseppe Besutti|title= "Litanie" in the Nuovo Dizionario di Mariologia|author2=Stefano De Fiores|author3= Salvatore Meo|series=I dizionari (n°. 17)|isbn= 9788821513961|location=Cinisello Balsamo (Milano)|publisher= San Paolo Edizioni|year= 1985|page=764}} (ISBN-10: 8821513963)

{{Main|Marian art in the Catholic Church}}

File:Giotto di Bondone - No. 6 Scenes from the Life of Joachim - 6. Meeting at the Golden Gate - WGA09176.jpg

The Immaculate Conception became a popular subject in literature,{{sfn|Twomey|2008|p=ix}} but its abstract nature meant it was late in appearing as a subject in art.{{sfn|Hall|2018|p=337}} During the Medieval period it was depicted as "Joachim and Anne Meeting at the Golden Gate", meaning Mary's conception through the chaste kiss of her parents at the Golden Gate in Jerusalem;{{sfn|Hall|2018|p=175}} the 14th and 15th centuries were the heyday for this scene, after which it was gradually replaced by more allegorical depictions featuring an adult Mary.{{sfn|Hall|2018|p=171}}

The definitive iconography for the depiction of "Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception" seems to have been finally established by the painter and theorist Francisco Pacheco in his "El arte de la pintura" of 1649: a beautiful young girl of 12 or 13, wearing a white tunic and blue mantle, rays of light emanating from her head ringed by twelve stars and crowned by an imperial crown, the Sun behind her and the Moon beneath her feet.{{sfn|Moffitt|2001|p=676}} Pacheco's iconography influenced other Spanish artists or artists active in Spain such as El Greco, Bartolomé Murillo, Diego Velázquez, and Francisco Zurbarán, who each produced a number of artistic masterpieces based on the use of these same symbols.{{sfn|Katz|Orsi|2001|p=98}} The popularity of this particular representation of The Immaculate Conception spread across the rest of Europe, and has since remained the best known artistic depiction of the concept: in a heavenly realm, moments after her creation, the spirit of Mary (in the form of a young woman) looks up in awe at (or bows her head to) God. The Moon is under her feet and a halo of twelve stars surround her head, possibly a reference to "a woman clothed with the sun" from Revelation 12:1–2. Additional imagery may include clouds, a golden light, and putti. In some paintings the putti are holding lilies and roses, flowers often associated with Mary.{{sfn|Jenner|1910|pp=3–9}}

{{further|Sinlessness of Mary}}

The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo and Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Churches believe in the Immaculate Conception of the Theotokos. The Ethiopic phrase used to express that the Blessed Virgin Mary is free from original sin is "መርገመ ስጋ መርገመ ነፍስ የሌለባት". The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church celebrates the Feast of the Immaculate Conception on Nehasie 7 (August 13).{{Cite web|url=https://english.eritreantewahdo.org/bwl-advanced-faq/what-is-our-position-on-st-mary-and-immaculate-conception-and-what-is-it/|title=What is our position on St. Mary and Immaculate Conception and what is it?|date=January 19, 2016|publisher=Diocese of U.S.A. and Canada, Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church}}{{Cite web|url=https://eotcmk.org/e/the-birth-of-the-blessed-virgin-mary-2/|title=THE BIRTH OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY – Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church Sunday School Department – Mahibere Kidusan}}

The proposition of Ethiopian Orthodox reads: "Our Lady, the Virgin Mary, who conceived and gave birth to Jesus Christ in virginity is free from the original sin derived from the descendants of Adam, clean from any sins of the flesh and soul; embedded in the conscience of God before the time of her birth, free and protected from human desires and frailties, and the choicest from among the chosen. Such is the Virgin Mary - Pure and Holy of Holies. (Song 4.7)".{{sfn|EOTC|2017|p=51}} This is synodal statement.

Eastern Orthodoxy never accepted Augustine's specific ideas on original sin, and in consequence did not become involved in the later developments that took place in the Catholic Church, including the Immaculate Conception,{{sfn|McGuckin|2010|p=218}}{{sfn|Coyle|1996|p=36}} although Eastern Orthodoxy affirms Mary's purity and preservation from sin.

In 1894, when Pope Leo XIII addressed the Eastern church in his encyclical Praeclara gratulationis, Ecumenical Patriarch Anthimos, in 1895, replied with an encyclical approved by the Constantinopolitan Synod in which he stigmatised the dogmas of the Immaculate Conception and papal infallibility as "Roman novelties" and called on the Roman church to return to the faith of the early centuries.{{sfn|Meyendorff|1981|p=90}} Eastern Orthodox Bishop Kallistos Ware comments that "the Latin dogma seems to us not so much erroneous as superfluous".{{sfn|Ware|1995|p=77}}

In the mid-19th century, some Catholics who were unable to accept the doctrine of papal infallibility left the Roman Church and formed the Old Catholic Church. This movement rejects the Immaculate Conception.{{sfn|Hillerbrand|2012|p=63}}{{sfn|Smit|2019|pp=14, 53}}

Protestants overwhelmingly condemned the promulgation of Ineffabilis Deus as an exercise in papal power, and the doctrine itself as unscriptural,{{sfn|Herringer|2019|p=507}} for it denied that all had sinned and rested on the Latin translation of Luke 1:28 (the "full of grace" passage) that the original Greek did not support.{{sfn|Hammond|2003|p=601}} Protestants, therefore, teach that Mary was a sinner saved through grace, like all believers.{{sfn|German|2001|p=596}}

The Catholic–Lutheran dialogue's statement The One Mediator, the Saints, and Mary, issued in 1990 after seven years of study and discussion, conceded that Lutherans and Catholics remained separated "by differing views on matters such as the invocation of saints, the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption of Mary";{{cite web |display-authors=3 |first1=J. Francis |last1=Stafford |first2=Avery |last2=Dulles |first3=Robert B. |last3=Eno |first4=Joseph A |last4=Fitzmyer |first5=Elizabeth |last5=Johnson |first6=Killian |last6=McDonnell |first7=Carl J. |last7=Peter |first8=Walter |last8=Principe |first9=Georges |last9=Tavard |first10=Frederick M. |last10=Jelly |first11=John f. |last11=Hotchkin |first12=George |last12=Anderson |first13=Robert W. |last13=Bertram |first14=Joseph W. |last14=Burgess |first15=Gerhard O. |last15=Forde |first16=Karlfried |last16=Froelich |first17=Eric |last17=Gritsch |first18=Kenneth |last18=Hagen |first19=John |last19=Reumann |first20=Daniel F. |last20=Martensen |first21=Horace |last21=Hummel |first22=John F. |last22=Johnson |title=Lutheran-Catholic Statement on Saints, Mary |url=http://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/ecumenical-and-interreligious/ecumenical/lutheran/upload/lu20.pdf |publisher=USCCB |access-date=7 April 2020 |language=en |date=23 February 1990}} the final report of the Anglican–Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC), created in 1969 to further ecumenical progress between the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion, similarly recorded the disagreement of the Anglicans with the doctrine, although Anglo-Catholics may hold the Immaculate Conception as an optional pious belief.{{sfn|Armentrout|2000|p=260}}

{{Portal|Catholicism}}

• Feast of the Immaculate Conception
• Feast of the Conception of the Virgin Mary
• Act for the Immaculate Conception of Mary
• Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (disambiguation)
• Church of the Immaculate Conception (disambiguation)
• Patronages of the Immaculate Conception
• Congregation of the Immaculate Conception
• Marian doctrines of the Catholic Church
• Marian Fathers of the Immaculate Conception
• Catholic Mariology
• Perpetual virginity of Mary

{{Reflist}}

{{refbegin|30em}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Armentrout

| first = Don S.

| title = An Episcopal Dictionary of the Church: A User-Friendly Reference for Episcopalians

| publisher = Church Publishing

| year = 2000

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=g4_P098HhHMC

| isbn = 9780898697018

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Barrely

| first = Christine

| title = The Little Book of Mary

| publisher = Chronicle Books

| year = 2014

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=eGWeAgAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9781452135663

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Boring

| first = Eugene

| title = An Introduction to the New Testament: History, Literature, Theology

| publisher = Westminster John Knox

| year = 2012

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=leFrgkyEtusC

| isbn = 9788178354569

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Boss

| first = Sarah Jane

| title = Empress and Handmaid: On Nature and Gender in the Cult of the Virgin Mary

| publisher = A&C Black

| year = 2000

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=wPWd4hICgDcC

| isbn = 9780304707812

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Bromiley

| first1 = Geoffrey W.

| title = The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

| publisher = Eerdmans

| year = 1995

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Zkla5Gl_66oC

| isbn = 9780802837851

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Brown

| first1 = Raymond Edward

| title = Mary in the New Testament

| publisher = Paulist Press

| year = 1978

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ML1mnUBwmhcC

| isbn = 9780809121687

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Buchanan

| first = Colin

| title = Historical Dictionary of Anglicanism

| publisher = Rowman & Littlefield

| year = 2015

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=mFCbCgAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9781442250161

}}

• {{Citation

|last1 = Cameron

|first1 = Euan

|chapter = Cultural and Sociopolitical Context of the Reformation

|editor1-last = Sæbø

|editor1-first = Magne

|editor2-last = Brekelmans

|editor2-first = Christianus

|editor3-last = Haran

|editor3-first = Menahem

|editor4-last = Fishbane

|editor4-first = Michael A.

|editor5-last = Ska

|editor5-first = Jean Louis

|editor6-last = Machinist

|editor6-first = Peter

|title = Hebrew Bible, Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation

|publisher = Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

|year = 1996

|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=OMlT-FViF40C

|isbn = 9783525539828

}}

• {{Cite book

|last1 = Carrigan

|first1 = Henry L.

|chapter = Virgin Birth

|editor1-last = Freedman

|editor1-first = David Noel

|editor2-last = Myers

|editor2-first = Allen C.

|title = Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible

|publisher = Eerdmans

|year = 2000

|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=qRtUqxkB7wkC

|isbn = 9789053565032

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Collinge

| first1 = William J.

| title = Historical Dictionary of Catholicism

| publisher = Scarecrow Press

| year = 2012

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=L8C3TKNdn5oC

| isbn = 9780810879799

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Coyle

| first = Kathleen

| title = Mary in the Christian Tradition: From a Contemporary Perspective

| publisher = Gracewing Publishing

| year = 1996

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=5QCZlA_j3BcC

| isbn = 9780852443804

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Elliott

| first1 = J.K.

| title = The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation

| publisher = OUP Oxford

| year = 1993

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=TXMcJPy1axAC

| isbn = 9780191520327

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = EOTC

| first1 =

| title = The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church Faith, Order and Ecumenical Relation

| publisher = Tensae Publishing House

| year = 2017

| url = https://books.google.com.et/books?id=ZU5yHAAACAAJ

| isbn =

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Espín

| first1 = Orlando O.

| chapter = Immaculate Conception

| editor1-last = Espín

| editor1-first = Orlando O.

| editor2-last = Nickoloff

| editor2-first = James B.

| title = An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies

| publisher = Liturgical Press

| year = 2007

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=k85JKr1OXcQC

| isbn = 9780814658567

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Fastiggi

| first1 = Robert

| chapter = Mariology in the Counter-Reformation

| editor1-last = Maunder

| editor1-first = Chris

| title = The Oxford Handbook of Mary

| publisher = Oxford University Press

| year = 2019

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=NgulDwAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9780198792550

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Foley

| first = Donal Anthony

| title = Marian Apparitions, the Bible, and the Modern World

| publisher = Gracewing Publishing

| year = 2002

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=p3tChFOtAiwC

| isbn = 9780852443132

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = German

| first1 = T.J.

| chapter = Immaculate Conception

| editor1-last = Elwell

| editor1-first = Walter A.

| title = Evangelical Dictionary of Theology

| publisher = Baker Academic

| year = 2001

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=yu846j61u0wC

| isbn = 9780801020759

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Göle

| first = Nilüfer

| title = Islam and Public Controversy in Europe

| publisher = Routledge

| year = 2016

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=e0sfDAAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9781317112549

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Granziera

| first1 = Patrizia

| chapter = Mary and Inculturation in Mexico and India

| editor1-last = Maunder

| editor1-first = Chris

| title = The Oxford Handbook of Mary

| publisher = Oxford University Press

| year = 2019

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=NgulDwAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9780198792550

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Hall

| first = James

| title = Dictionary of Subjects and Symbols in Art

| publisher = Routledge

| year = 2018

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=oR-yDwAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9780429962509

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Hernández

| first = Rosilie

| title = Immaculate Conceptions: The Power of the Religious Imagination in Early Modern Spain

| publisher = University of Toronto Press

| year = 2019

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=UWiwDwAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9781487504779

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Herringer

| first1 = Carol Engelhardt

| chapter = Mary as Cultural Symbol in the Nineteenth Century

| editor1-last = Maunder

| editor1-first = Chris

| title = The Oxford Handbook of Mary

| publisher = Oxford University Press

| year = 2019

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=NgulDwAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9780198792550

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Hillerbrand

| first = Hans J.

| title = A New History of Christianity

| publisher = Abingdon Press

| year = 2012

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=pmBUIcGW4T4C&pg=PA63

| isbn = 9781426719141

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Hammond

| first = Carolyn

| chapter = Mary

| editor1-last = Houlden

| editor1-first = James Leslie

| title = Jesus in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia, Volume 1

| publisher = ABC-CLIO

| year = 2003

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=17kzgBusXZIC

| isbn = 9781576078563

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Jenner

| first = Katherine Lee Rawlings

| title = Our Lady in Art

| publisher = A.C. McClurg & Company

| year = 1910

| oclc = 903296042

| url = http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/5153827.html

}}

• {{cite journal

|last=Kappes

|first=Christiaan

|title=Immaculate Conception: Why Thomas Aquinas Denied, While Duns Scotus, Gregory Palamas, and Mark Eugenicus Professed Absolute Immaculate Existence of Mary

|year=2014

|journal=Academy of the Immaculate

|location=New Bedford, MA

|url=https://www.academia.edu/4375213

}}

• {{Cite book

| last1 = Katz

| first1 = Melissa R.

| last2 = Orsi

| first2 = Robert A.

| title = Divine Mirrors: The Virgin Mary in the Visual Arts

| publisher = Oxford University Press

| year = 2001

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Kritzeck

| first = James Aloysius

| title = Peter the Venerable and Islam

| publisher = Princeton University Press

| year = 2015

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=KhfWCgAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9781400875771

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Lohse

| first1 = Bernhard

| title = A Short History of Christian Doctrine

| publisher = Fortress Press

| year = 1966

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=-_SAE5-K_l8C&pg=PA204

| url-access = registration

| isbn = 9781451404234

}}

• {{cite book |title=The museum of the mind: art and memory in world cultures|last=Mack |first=John|publisher=British Museum|year=2003}}
• {{cite book

| last1 = Manelli

| first1 = Fr. Stephano

| title = All Generations Shall Call Me Blessed: Biblical Mariology

| publisher = Academy of the Immaculate

| year = 1994

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=tUoXAgAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9781601140005

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Manelli

| first1 = Fr. Stephano

| chapter = The Mystery of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the Old Testament

| editor1-last = Miravalle

| editor1-first = Mark I.

| title = Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons

| publisher = Seat of Wisdom Books

| year = 2008

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ez0VRbQi1i4C

| isbn = 9781579183554

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Maunder

| first1 = Chris

| chapter = Introduction

| editor1-last = Maunder

| editor1-first = Chris

| title = The Oxford Handbook of Mary

| publisher = Oxford University Press

| year = 2019

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=NgulDwAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9780198792550

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Meyendorff

| first = Jean

| title = The Orthodox Church: Its Past and Its Role in the World Today

| publisher = St Vladimir's Seminary Press

| year = 1981

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=E16XzwPdJtsC

| isbn = 9788178354569

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = McGuckin

| first = John Anthony

| title = The Orthodox Church: An Introduction to its History, Doctrine, and Spiritual Culture

| publisher = John Wiley & Sons

| year = 2010

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=wMY5P4KSiM8C

| isbn = 9781444393835

}}

• {{Citation

|last1 = Moffitt

|first1 = John F.

|chapter = Modern Extraterrestrial Portraiture

|editor1-last = Caron

|editor1-first = Richard

|editor2-last = Godwin

|editor2-first = Joscelyn

|editor3-last = Hanegraaff

|editor3-first = Wouter J.

|editor4-last = Vieillard-Baron

|editor4-first = Jean-Louis

|title = Esotérisme, gnoses & imaginaire symbolique: mélanges offerts à Antoine Faivre

|publisher = Peeters Publishers

|year = 2001

|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=rNF0O3K2EQEC

|isbn = 9789042909557

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Mullett

| first = Michael A.

| title = The Catholic Reformation

| publisher = Psychology Press

| year = 1999

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=1RRKrNCB5_8C

| isbn = 9780415189149

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Nixon

| first1 = Virginia

| title = Mary's Mother: Saint Anne in Late Medieval Europe

| publisher = Penn State Press

| year = 2004

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=37XJ2IKgPf0C

| isbn = 0271024666

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Norman

| first = Edward R.

| title = The Roman Catholic Church: An Illustrated History

| publisher = University of California Press

| year = 2007

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=XgIyOR8pCHMC

| isbn = 9780520252516

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Obach

| first = Robert

| title = The Catholic Church on Marital Intercourse: From St. Paul to Pope John Paul II

| publisher = Lexington Books

| year = 2008

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=yP_Sbtq_XZgC

| isbn = 9780739130896

}}

• {{Citation

|last1 = O'Collins

|first1 = Gerald

|chapter = Dogma

|editor1-last = Richardson

|editor1-first = Alan

|editor2-last = Bowden

|editor2-first = John

|title = The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Theology

|publisher = Westminster John Knox Press

|year = 1983

|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=PN7UMUTBBPAC

|isbn = 9780664227487

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Pies

| first = Ronald W.

| title = The Ethics of the Sages: An Interfaith Commentary on Pirkei Avot

| publisher = Jason Aronson

| year = 2000

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=hErhExBfZAMC

| isbn = 9780765761033

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Reynolds

| first = Brian

| title = Gateway to Heaven: Marian Doctrine and Devotion, Image and Typology in the Patristic and Medieval Periods, Volume 1

| publisher = New City Press

| year = 2012

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=_yWVkCWe3n0C

| isbn = 9781565484498

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Schaff

| first = Philip

| title = Creeds of Christendom: Volume I

| publisher = CCEL

| year = 1931

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ICsleJlkc94C

| isbn = 9781610250375

| edition = 6th

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Sheed

| first = Frank J.

| title = Theology for Beginners

| publisher = A&C Black

| year = 1958

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Du8T-iKfou0C

| isbn = 9780722074251

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Shoemaker

| first = Stephen J.

| title = Mary in Early Christian Faith and Devotion

| publisher = Yale University Press

| year = 2016

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Fa8ODAAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9780300219531

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Smit

| first = Peter-Ben

| title = Old Catholic Theology: An Introduction

| publisher = Brill

| year = 2019

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=w8y8DwAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9789004412149

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Solberg

| first = Emma Maggie

| title = Virgin Whore

| publisher = Cornell University Press

| year = 2018

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=6tpwDwAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9781501730344

}}

• {{cite book

| last = Stortz

| first = Martha Ellen

| chapter = Where or When Was Your Servant Innocent?

| editor1-last = Bunge

| editor1-first = Marcia J.

| title = The Child in Christian Thought

| publisher = Eerdmans

| year = 2001

| chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=QBrHz8gRRowC&pg=PA93

| isbn = 9780802846938

}}

• {{Citation

|last1 = Tinsley

|first1 = E.J.

|chapter = Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary

|editor1-last = Richardson

|editor1-first = Alan

|editor2-last = Bowden

|editor2-first = John

|title = The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Theology

|publisher = Presbyterian Publishing House

|year = 2005

|chapter-url = https://books.google.com/books?id=PN7UMUTBBPAC&pg=PA286

|isbn = 9780664227487

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Toews

| first = John

| title = The Story of Original Sin

| publisher = Wipf and Stock Publishers

| year = 2013

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=5JBNAwAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9781620323694

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Twomey

| first = Lesley K.

| title = The Serpent and the Rose: The Immaculate Conception and Hispanic Poetry in the Late Medieval Period

| publisher = Brill

| year = 2008

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Qz6wCQAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9789047433200

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Ware

| first1 = Bishop Kallistos

| title = The Orthodox Way

| publisher = St Vladimir's Seminary Press

| year = 1995

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=HG8c-lUZIDEC

| isbn = 9780913836583

}}

• {{Cite book

| last = Wiley

| first = Tatha

| title = Original Sin: Origins, Developments, Contemporary Meanings

| publisher = Paulist Press

| year = 2002

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=eUVrj1R8f2oC

| isbn = 9780809141289

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Williams

| first1 = Paul

| chapter = The Virgin Mary in the Eucharist

| editor1-last = Maunder

| editor1-first = Chris

| title = The Oxford Handbook of Mary

| publisher = Oxford University Press

| year = 2019

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=NgulDwAAQBAJ

| isbn = 9780198792550

}}

• {{cite book

| last1 = Wright

| first1 = David F.

| chapter = Mary

| editor1-last = McKim

| editor1-first = Donald K.

| editor2-last = Wright

| editor2-first = David F.

| title = Encyclopedia of the Reformed Faith

| publisher = Westminster John Knox Press

| year = 1992

| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=MJPsgwN789gC

| isbn = 9780664218829

}}

{{refend}}

{{Commons category|Immaculate Conception}}

• [https://www.papalencyclicals.net/pius09/p9ineff.htm Ineffabilis Deus] – encyclical defining the Immaculate Conception

{{Virgin Mary}}

{{Catholic saints}}

{{Liturgical year of the Catholic Church}}

{{History of the Catholic Church}}

{{Catholicism}}

{{Our Lady of Lourdes}}

{{Madonna styles}}

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Conception, Immaculate}}

Category:Anglican Mariology

Category:Articles containing video clips

Immac

Immac

Immac

Immac

Immac

Immac

Category:Scotism

Category:Western Christianity