Indosaurus

{{Location map|India

|width = 225px

|coordinates={{coord|23.2|N|80.0|E|display=inline}}

|caption= Indosaurus type locality in Carnosaur beds, Bara Simla, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India

|pushpin_relief=1

}}

The now-lost holotype was discovered between 1917 and 1919 in Jabalpur, India (GSI K27/565), by Charles Alfred Matley.The type species, Indosaurus matleyi, was named by Huene and Matley in 1933 making Indosaurus the first majungasaurine to be discovered.F. von Huene and C. A. Matley, 1933, "The Cretaceous Saurischia and Ornithischia of the Central Provinces of India", Palaeontologica Indica (New Series), Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India 21(1): 1-74 The generic name refers to India and the specific name honours Matley. This species now also includes Megalosaurus matleyi. Some paleontologists have speculated that Indosuchus, Lametasaurus and Indosaurus should be considered as nomina dubia.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225243196_Rahiolisaurus_gujaratensis_n_gen_n_sp_A_New_Abelisaurid_Theropod_from_the_Late_Cretaceous_of_India {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}

The parietal of the frontal-parietal region is broad whereas the lower surface of the frontal is wide, the transverse crest lies above and behind the orbit. The frontals are concave and decline in to the front of the cranium. The supratemporal fossa is short and broad as in Antrodemus.{{cite journal |last=Chatterjee |first=Sankar |date=1978 |title=Indosuchus and Indosaurus, Cretaceous carnosaurs from India |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291807131 |journal=Journal of Paleontology |volume=52 |issue=3 |pages=570–580 |via=ResearchGate}} The incomplete skull is of unusual thickness, although it lacked a dome on frontal bones as seen in Majungasaurus. It would have also lacked the paired frontal horns seen in Carnotaurus. Both Indosuchus and Indosaurus had a conservative skull roof which was dorsoventrally thickened but did not process prominences above the skull roof, similar to the condition seen in Abelisaurus.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288914603_Cretaceous_theropods_from_India_A_review_of_specimens_described_by_Huene_and_Matley_1933

The species I. matleyi weighed roughly {{cvt|700|kg}}.{{Citation needed|date=April 2025}}

Originally assigned by Huene to the Allosauridae, Indosaurus is today considered a member of the Abelisauridae family.{{Cite journal |last1=Tortosa |first1=Thierry |last2=Buffetaut |first2=Eric |last3=Vialle |first3=Nicolas |last4=Dutour |first4=Yves |last5=Turini |first5=Eric |last6=Cheylan |first6=Gilles |date=2014-01-01 |title=A new abelisaurid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of southern France: Palaeobiogeographical implications |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S075339691300089X |journal=Annales de Paléontologie |language=en |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=63–86 |doi=10.1016/j.annpal.2013.10.003 |bibcode=2014AnPal.100...63T |issn=0753-3969|url-access=subscription }} It shows similarities to the other Abelisaurids from India, such as Rajasaurus and Rahiolisaurus, and is hence usually placed within Abelisauridae, though the fragmentary nature for this taxon makes it difficult to recognize its exact taxonomic validity.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373144530_Review_of_the_Cretaceous_dinosaurs_from_India_and_their_paleobiogeographic_significance {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}

In 2014 Thierry Tortosa erected the subfamily Majungasaurinae. This was to separate Arcovenator, Majungasaurus, Indosaurus, Rahiolisaurus, and Rajasaurus from South American abelisaurids based on physical characteristics such as elongated antorbital fenestrae in front of the eye sockets, and a sagittal crest that widens into a triangular surface towards the front of the head.

It was suggested that the abelisaurids migrated between Africa, Europe, India and Madagascar, which would isolate the South American abelisaurids. It is possible that migration occurred between Europe and India across Africa given its proximity to both, and the volcanic Dras-Kohistan island arc may have allowed island hopping and an indirect path to Asia, though these are still questionable explanations.{{cite journal |last1=Tortosa |first1=T. |last2=Buffetaut |first2=E. |last3=Vialle |first3=N. |last4=Dutour |first4=Y. |last5=Turini |first5=E. |last6=Cheylan |first6=G. |year=2014 |title=A new abelisaurid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of southern France: Palaeobiogeographical implications |journal=Annales de Paléontologie |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=63–86 |bibcode=2014AnPal.100...63T |doi=10.1016/j.annpal.2013.10.003}}{{cite journal |last1=Kapur |first1=V. V. |last2=Khosla |first2=A. |year=2016 |title=Late Cretaceous terrestrial biota from India with special reference to vertebrates and their implications for biogeographic connections |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308209674 |journal=Cretaceous Period: Biotic Diversity and Biogeography |volume=71 |pages=161–172}}

The following cladogram was recovered by Tortosa (2014):

{{clade| style=font-size:100%; line-height:100%

|label1=Ceratosauria

|1={{clade

|1=Ceratosaurus

|2=Noasauridae

|3={{clade

|label1=Abelisauridae

|1={{clade

|1={{clade

|label1=Carnotaurinae

|1={{clade

|1=Carnotaurus 15px

|2=Abelisaurus 15px

}}

}}

|2={{clade

|label1=Majungasaurinae

|1={{clade

|1=Rajasaurus 15px

|2=Majungasaurus 15px

|3=Indosaurus 15px

|4=Rahiolisaurus 15px

|5=Arcovenator 15px

}} }} }} }} }} }}

Indosaurus lived in the Lameta Formation during the Maastrichtian age of the Cretaceous period. It is known to have lived alongside sauropods like Isisaurus, Jainosaurus and the dubious Titanosaurus, which it may have preyed upon. Other ceratosaurs such as the abelisaurid Rajasaurus, Rahiolisaurus and Indosuchus are known from the formation, along with the noasaurid Laevisuchus. The ichnogenus Deltapodus is also known from the formation, which may belong to the youngest know stegosaurid. The madtsoiid snake Sanajeh was also contemporaneous to Indosaurus.

The rocks of the Lameta formation appear to have been deposited in fluvial or lacustrine conditions. The environment at the time of deposition has alternatively been considered semi-arid, or tropical humid.{{Cite journal |last1=Srivastava |first1=Ashok K. |last2=Mankar |first2=Rupesh S. |date=January 2015 |title=Lithofacies architecture and depositional environment of Late Cretaceous Lameta Formation, central India |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-013-1192-y |journal=Arabian Journal of Geosciences |language=en |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=207–226 |doi=10.1007/s12517-013-1192-y |bibcode=2015ArJG....8..207S |issn=1866-7511 |s2cid=67851941|url-access=subscription }}{{Cite journal |last1=Kumari |first1=Anjali |last2=Singh |first2=Seema |last3=Khosla |first3=Ashu |date=January 2021 |title=Palaeosols and palaeoclimate reconstruction of the Maastrichtian Lameta Formation, Central India |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0195667120303189 |journal=Cretaceous Research |language=en |volume=117 |pages=104632 |bibcode=2021CrRes.11704632K |doi=10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104632 |s2cid=224946979|url-access=subscription }}

The dinosaurs in India probably all went extinct due to volcanic activity around 350,000 years before the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary. Dinosaurs probably avoided areas with volcanic fissure vents and lava flows.{{cite journal |last1=Mohabey |first1=D. M. |last2=Samant |first2=B. |year=2013 |title=Deccan continental flood basalt eruption terminated Indian dinosaurs before the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263733418 |journal=Geological Society of India Special Publication |pages=260–267 |number=1}}

{{Portal|Dinosaurs}}

• Timeline of ceratosaur research

{{Reflist}}

{{Theropoda|B.}}

{{Taxonbar|from=Q135312}}

Category:Abelisauridae

Category:Dinosaur genera

Category:Maastrichtian dinosaurs

Category:Fossil taxa described in 1933

Category:Taxa named by Charles Alfred Matley

Category:Taxa named by Friedrich von Huene

Category:Dinosaurs of India

{{theropod-stub}}