James Burnham#The Managerial Revolution

{{Short description|American philosopher (1905–1987)}}

{{Infobox academic

| name = James Burnham

| image = James_Burnham.jpg

| alt =

| caption =

| birth_date = November 22, 1905

| birth_place = Chicago, Illinois, U.S.

| death_date = {{d-da|July 28, 1987|November 22, 1905}}

| death_place = Kent, Connecticut, U.S.

| spouse = {{marriage|Marcia Lightner|1934}}

| relatives = David Burnham (brother)

| awards =

| alma_mater =

| thesis_title =

| thesis_url =

| thesis_year =

| school_tradition = {{hlist | Trotskyism (early) | American conservatism (late)}}

| doctoral_advisor =

| academic_advisors =

| influences = {{flatlist|

}}

| era =

| discipline = Philosophy

| sub_discipline = Political philosophy

| workplaces = New York University

| doctoral_students =

| notable_students = Maurice Natanson

| main_interests =

| notable_works = The Managerial Revolution (1941)
The Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom (1943)

| notable_ideas = Managerial class
Managerial state

| influenced = {{flatlist|

}}

| signature =

| signature_alt =

| education = {{ubl | Princeton University | Balliol College, Oxford}}

}}

James Burnham (November 22, 1905 – July 28, 1987) was an American philosopher and political theorist. He chaired the New York University Department of Philosophy.

His first book was An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis (1931). Burnham became a prominent Trotskyist activist in the 1930s. His most famous book, The Managerial Revolution (1941), speculated on the future of an increasingly proceduralist hence sclerotic society. A year before he wrote the book, he rejected Marxism and became an influential theorist of the political right as a leader of the American conservative movement.{{Cite book|last=Kelly|first=Daniel|title=James Burnham and the Struggle for the World: A Life|date=2002|publisher= ISI Books|isbn=1-882926-76-5|location=Wilmington, DE |oclc=50158918}} Burnham was an editor and a regular contributor to William F. Buckley's conservative magazine National Review on a variety of topics. He rejected containment of the Soviet Union and called for the rollback of communism worldwide.[https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1987/07/31/james-burnham-82-national-review-editor/6eec0cfe-2bdc-4122-9a82-b5139f78b8fe/ James Burnham, 82, National Review Editor] {{Webarchive |url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180629211327/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1987/07/31/james-burnham-82-national-review-editor/6eec0cfe-2bdc-4122-9a82-b5139f78b8fe/ |date= 2018-06-29}}, Washington Post{{Cite book|last= Burnham |first=James|url= https://archive.org/details/warweareinla00burn|title=The War We Are In: The Last Decade and the Next|date=1967|publisher=Arlington House |location=New Rochelle, NY |oclc=654685307|ol=26318667M}}

Biography

=Early life=

Born in Chicago, Illinois, on November 22, 1905,{{Cite book | author= Manfred Overesch, Friedrich Wilhelm Saal | title = Chronik deutscher Zeitgeschichte: Politik, Wirtschaft, Kultur | volume = 3, Part 2 | year = 1986 | publisher = Droste | isbn = 3-7700-0719-0 | page = 791 }} James Burnham was the son of Claude George Burnham, an English immigrant and executive with the Burlington Railroad.{{cite web |url= http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/AD_Issues/amdipl_17/articles/sempa_burnham1.html | work =Sempa | title = James Burnham (I) |publisher= UNC |date=2000-12-03 |access-date=2012-11-25 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20121004213624/http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/AD_Issues/amdipl_17/articles/sempa_burnham1.html |archive-date=2012-10-04 |url-status=live }} James was raised as a Roman Catholic but rejected Catholicism as a college student, professing atheism for the rest of his life.Priscilla Buckley, "James Burnham 1905–1987." National Review, July 11, 1987, p. 35. He graduated at the top of his class at Princeton University before attending Balliol College, Oxford, where his professors included J. R. R. Tolkien and Martin D'Arcy. In 1929, he became a professor of philosophy at New York University.{{Cite web|last=Kimball|first=Roger|author-link=Roger Kimball|date=September 2002|title=The power of James Burnham|url= https://newcriterion.com/issues/2002/9/the-power-of-james-burnham |url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191014070728/https://newcriterion.com/issues/2002/9/the-power-of-james-burnham|archive-date=2019-10-14|access-date=2020-06-03 |website=The New Criterion}}

In 1934, he married Marcia Lightner.{{Cite book|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=V8XXBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT12|title=Suicide of the West: An Essay on the Meaning and Destiny of Liberalism|first= James|last=Burnham|date=November 25, 2014|publisher=Encounter Books|isbn=978-1-59403784-9|via=Google Books}}

=Trotskyism=

In 1933, along with Sidney Hook, Burnham helped to organize the American Workers Party led by the Dutch-born pacifist minister A. J. Muste.{{Sfn | Diggins | 1975 | pp = 169–70}}"The Cerebral Communist: James Burnham", pp. 160–201. Burnham supported the 1934 merger with the Communist League of America which formed the US Workers Party. In 1935, he allied with the Trotskyist wing of that party and favored fusion with the Socialist Party of America. During this period, he became a friend to Leon Trotsky. Writing for Partisan Review, Burnham was also an important influence on writers including Dwight Macdonald and Philip Rahv.{{Sfn | Diggins | 1975 | p = 180}} However, Burnham's engagement with Trotskyism was short-lived: from 1937 a number of disagreements came to the fore.

In 1937, the Trotskyists were expelled from the Socialist Party, an action which led to the formation of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) at the end of the year. Inside the SWP, Burnham allied with Max Shachtman in a faction fight over the position of the SWP's majority faction, led by James P. Cannon and backed by Leon Trotsky, defending the Soviet Union as a degenerated workers state against the incursions of imperialism. Shachtman and Burnham, especially after witnessing the Nazi–Soviet pact of 1939 and the invasions of Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia by Joseph Stalin's regime, as well as the Soviet invasion of Finland in November 1939, came to contend that the USSR was a new form of imperialistic class society and was thus not worthy of even critical support from the socialist movement.{{citation needed |date=April 2020}}

In February 1940 he wrote Science and Style: A Reply to Comrade Trotsky, in which he broke with dialectical materialism. In this text he responds to Trotsky's request to draw his attention to "those works which should supplant the system of dialectic materialism for the proletariat" by referring to Principia Mathematica by Russell and Whitehead and "the scientists, mathematicians and logicians now cooperating in the new Encyclopedia of Unified Science".Burhham J. (1940) Science and Style A Reply to Comrade Trotsky, in In Defence of Marxism by Leon Trotsky, London 1966, pp. 232–56.

After a protracted discussion inside the SWP, in which the factions argued their case in a series of heated internal discussion bulletins, the special 3rd National Convention of the organization in early April 1940 decided the question in favor of the Cannon majority by a vote of 55–31.James P. Cannon, "The Convention of the Socialist Workers Party," The Fourth International, v. 1, no. 1 (May 1940), p. 16. Even though the majority sought to avoid a split by offering to continue the debate and to allow proportional representation of the minority on the party's governing National Committee, Shachtman, Burnham, and their supporters resigned from the SWP to launch their own organization, again called the Workers Party.

This break also marked the end of Burnham's participation in the radical movement, however. On May 21, 1940, he addressed a letter to the National Committee of the Workers Party resigning from the organization. In it he made it clear the distance he had moved away from Marxism:

{{quote| I reject, as you know, the "philosophy of Marxism," dialectical materialism. ...

The general Marxian theory of "universal history", to the extent that it has any empirical content, seems to me disproved by modern historical and anthropological investigation.

Marxian economics seems to me for the most part either false or obsolete or meaningless in application to contemporary economic phenomena. Those aspects of Marxian economics which retain validity do not seem to me to justify the theoretical structure of the economics.

Not only do I believe it meaningless to say that "socialism is inevitable" and false that socialism is "the only alternative to capitalism"; I consider that on the basis of the evidence now available to us a new form of exploitive society (which I call "managerial society") is not only possible but is a more probable outcome of the present than socialism. ...

On no ideological, theoretic or political ground, then, can I recognize, or do I feel, any bond or allegiance to the Workers Party (or to any other Marxist party). That is simply the case, and I can no longer pretend about it, either to myself or to others.James Burnham, "Burnham's Letter of Resignation," The Fourth International, v. 1, no. 4 (August 1940), pp. 106–07."[http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/burnham/1940/05/resignation.htm James Burnham: Letter of Resignation (1940)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100314223236/http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/burnham/1940/05/resignation.htm |date=2010-03-14 }}" on Marxists Internet Archive. Retrieved January 5, 2010.}}

In 1941, Burnham wrote a book analyzing the development of economics and society as he saw it, called The Managerial Revolution: What is Happening in the World. The book was included in Life magazine's list of the 100 outstanding books of 1924–1944.Canby, Henry Seidel. "The 100 Outstanding Books of 1924–1944". Life, 14 August 1944. Chosen in collaboration with the magazine's editors.

=OSS and ''National Review''=

{{Conservatism US|intellectuals}}

During World War II, Burnham took a leave from NYU to work for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), a forerunner of the Central Intelligence Agency. Recommended by George F. Kennan, Burnham was invited to lead the semi-autonomous "Political and Psychological Warfare" division of the Office of Policy Coordination.

Subsequently, during the Cold War, he called for an aggressive strategy against the Soviet Union. A contributor to The Freeman in the early 1950s, he considered the magazine too focused on economic issues, though it presented a wide range of opinion on the Soviet threat. In The Struggle for the World (1947), he called for common citizenship between the United States, Great Britain, and the British dominions, as well as a "World Federation" against communism. Burnham thought in terms of a hegemonic world, instead of a balance of power:

A World Federation initiated and led by the United States would be, we have recognized, a World Empire. In this imperial federation, the United States, with a monopoly of atomic weapons, would hold a preponderance of decisive material power over all the rest of the world. In world politics, that is to say, there would not be a balance of power.James Burnham, The Struggle for the World (Toronto: Longmans, 1947), 190, 210.

In 1955, he helped William F. Buckley Jr. found National Review magazine, which from the start took positions in foreign policy consistent with Burnham's own. In the National Review, he wrote a column titled "Third World War," which referred to the Cold War.{{Cite web|last=Sempa|first=Francis P.|date=May 27, 2020|title=Forget About a 'New' Cold War. The Old One Never Ended.|url=https://thediplomat.com/2020/05/forget-about-a-new-cold-war-the-old-one-never-ended/|access-date=2020-06-03|website=The Diplomat |language=en-US|archive-date=2020-06-03 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200603011202/https://thediplomat.com/2020/05/forget-about-a-new-cold-war-the-old-one-never-ended/|url-status=live}} Burnham became a lifelong contributor to the journal, and Buckley referred to him as "the number one intellectual influence on National Review since the day of its founding." His approach to foreign policy has caused some to regard him as the first "neoconservative," although Burnham's ideas have been an important influence on both the paleoconservative and neoconservative factions of the American Right.{{Cite journal |last=Kampmark|first=Binoy|date=October 2011|title=The first neo-conservative: James Burnham and the origins of a movement|journal=Review of International Studies|volume=37|issue=4|pages= 1885–1902|doi=10.1017/S0260210510001117|s2cid=145548819 |issn= 0260-2105}}

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

In early November 1978 he suffered a stroke which affected his health and short-term memory.{{Cite book | last = Kupferberg | first = Feiwel | title = The rise and fall of the German Democratic Republic | year = 2002 | publisher = Transaction Publishers | location = New Brunswick, NJ | isbn = 0-7658-0122-1 | page = 60 }} He died of kidney and liver cancer{{Cite book | last = Hart | first = Jeffrey D. | title = The making of the American conservative mind: National review and its times | year = 2005 | publisher = ISI Books | location = Wilmington, Del. | isbn = 1-932236-81-3 | page = [https://archive.org/details/makingofamerican00hart/page/255 255] | url = https://archive.org/details/makingofamerican00hart/page/255 }} at home in Kent, Connecticut, on July 28, 1987.{{Cite book | last = Francis | first = Samuel T. | author-link = Sam Francis (writer) | title = Beautiful Losers: Essays on the Failure of American Conservatism | year = 1994 | publisher = Univ of Missouri Pr | isbn = 0-8262-0976-9 | page = [https://archive.org/details/beautifullosers00samu/page/129 129] | url = https://archive.org/details/beautifullosers00samu/page/129 }} He was buried in Kent on August 1, 1987.{{Cite book | last = Smant | first = Kevin J. | title = How great the triumph: James Burnham, anticommunism, and the conservative movement | year = 1992 | publisher = University Press of America | location = Lanham | isbn = 0-8191-8464-0 | page = 152 }}

Ideas

=''The Managerial Revolution''=

File:Managerial-revolution-1941.jpg of the 1941 edition of Burnham's seminal work]]

{{Excerpt|The Managerial Revolution#Summary|hat=no}}

=Later writings=

In The Machiavellians, he developed his theory that the emerging new élite would prosper better if it retained some democratic trappings—political opposition, a free press, and a controlled "circulation of the élites."

His 1964 book Suicide of the West became a classic text for the post-war conservative movement in American politics, proclaiming Burnham's new interest in traditional moral values, classical liberal economics and anti-communism. He defined political ideologies as syndromes afflicting their proponents with various internal contradictions. His works greatly influenced paleoconservative author Sam Francis, who wrote two books about Burnham, and based his political theories upon the "managerial revolution" and the resulting managerial state.

In fiction

British writer George Orwell was inspired by Burnham's The Managerial Revolution and his explanation of power,{{Cite web |title= George Orwell 1984 Critical commentary|url= https://ptfaculty.gordonstate.edu/jmallory/index_files/page0367.htm |access-date= 2021-12-30 |website= PT faculty | publisher = Gordon state |archive-date=2021-09-03|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210903145456/https://ptfaculty.gordonstate.edu/jmallory/index_files/page0367.htm |url-status= live}} which informed Orwell's 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. Orwell noted in 1945, "For Burnham's geographical picture of the new world has turned out to be correct. More and more obviously the surface of the earth is being parceled off into three great empires ...".{{Cite web|title=You and the Atom Bomb |url= https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/you-and-the-atom-bomb/ |access-date= 2021-10-08|website= The Orwell Foundation |date=19 October 2011 |language=en-GB |archive-date=2019-12-18|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20191218090759/https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/you-and-the-atom-bomb/ |url-status= live}} The superpowers of Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia in the novel are partly influenced by Burnham's assessment of Roosevelt's America, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union as being managerial states. In 1946 Orwell, summarized Burnham's managerial revolution and outlined the geopolitical landscape of Nineteen Eighty-Four:

{{Quote | The rulers of this new society will be the people who effectively control the means of production: that is, business executives, technicians, bureaucrats and soldiers, lumped together by Burnham, under the name of 'managers'. These people will eliminate the old capitalist class, crush the working class, and so organise society that all power and economic privilege remain in their own hands. Private property rights will be abolished, but common ownership will not be established. The new 'managerial' societies will not consist of a patchwork of small, independent states, but of great super-states grouped round the main industrial centres in Europe, Asia, and America. These super-states will fight among themselves for possession of the remaining uncaptured portions of the earth, but will probably be unable to conquer one another completely. Internally, each society will be hierarchical, with an aristocracy of talent at the top and a mass of semi-slaves at the bottom."{{Cite web|title=Second Thoughts on James Burnham |url= https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/second-thoughts-on-james-burnham/ |website= The Orwell Foundation}}}}

While Orwell partly agreed with Burnham's analysis, he never fully accepted Burnham's attitude towards Machiavellian managerial power. This unresolved thought helped to inspire the character of O'Brien, who talks about power and regimes in Nineteen Eighty-Four.{{Cite web|title=1984 Historical and Social Context |url= https://www.enotes.com/topics/1984/in-depth/historical-social-context|access-date= 2021-12-30 |website= eNotes |archive-date= 2021-12-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211230010850/https://www.enotes.com/topics/1984/in-depth/historical-social-context |url-status=live}}

Works

Books

Book contributions

Pamphlets

  • [http://purl.flvc.org/FCLA/DT/367713 War and the Workers] (as John West). New York: Workers Party of the United States, 1935. [http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/burnham/1936/war/ Marxists].
  • [http://purl.flvc.org/FCLA/DT/2683067 Why Did They "Confess"? A Study of the Radek-Piatakov Trial.] New York: Pioneer Publishers, 1937. [http://www.marxists.org/history/ussr/government/law/1937/moscow-trials/radek-piatakov-trial.htm Marxists].
  • [http://ucf.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/ucf%3A4797 The People's Front: The New Betrayal.] New York: Pioneer Publishers, 1937. [http://www.bolshevik.org/Pamphlets/Burnham_PopFront/BPF%200.html Bolshevik].
  • How to Fight War: Isolation, Collective Security, Relentless Class Struggle? New York: Socialist Workers Party & Young Peoples Socialist League (4th Internationalists), 1938.
  • [http://digital.library.pitt.edu/cgi-bin/t/text/text-idx?idno=31735059397160;view=toc;c=amlefttxt Let the People Vote on War!] New York: Pioneer Publishers, 1939?.
  • [http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/idom/dm/index.htm In Defense of Marxism (Against the Petty-Bourgeois Opposition)] (with Leon Trotsky, Joseph Hansen and William Warde). New York: Pioneer Publishers, 1942.

Public speaking

  • Why Does a Country Go Communist? An address delivered at the Indian Congress for Cultural Freedom on March 31, 1951. Bombay: Democratic Research Service, 1951.

Selected articles

See also

References

{{reflist}}

Sources

{{sfn whitelist|CITEREFBurnham1941}}

  • {{Citation | first = John P. | last = Diggins | url = https://archive.org/details/upfromcommunismc00digg/mode/2up | title = Up From Communism | place = New York | publisher = Columbia University Press | year = 1975 | via = The Internet archive}}

Further reading

  • David T. Byrne, James Burnham: An Intellectual Biography, Northern Illinois University Press, 2025
  • Samuel Francis, [https://web.archive.org/web/20170106061803/http://www.mmisi.org/pr/12_01/francis.pdf Power and History, The Political Thought of James Burnham.] London: Claridge Press, 1999.
  • Grant Havers, "James Burnham's Elite Theory and the Postwar American Right," Telos 154 (Spring 2011): 29–50.
  • Benjamin Guy Hoffman, [https://www.proquest.com/openview/ac8dec97d373db2d20cc2c5480780ea2/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y The Political Thought of James Burnham.] PhD dissertation. University of Michigan, 1969.
  • Daniel Kelly, [https://archive.org/details/jamesburnhamstru0000kell James Burnham and the Struggle for the World: A Life.] Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.
  • C. Wright Mills and Hans Gerth, "A Marx for the Managers", 1942. Reprinted in Power, Politics, and People: The Collected Essays of C. Wright Mills edited by Irving Horowitz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.
  • George Orwell, "Second Thoughts on James Burnham," Polemic, No. 3, May 1946.
  • Paul Sweezy, "The Illusion of the 'Managerial Revolution,'" Science & Society, vol. 6, no. 1 (Winter 1942), pp. 1–23. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/40399677 In JSTOR].