Jin Chinese#Phonology

After the concept of Mandarin Chinese was proposed, the Jin dialects were universally included within it, mainly because Chinese linguists paid little attention to these dialects at the time. In order to promote Standard Mandarin in the early days of People's Republic of China, linguists started to research various dialects in Shanxi, comparing these dialects with Standard Mandarin for helping the locals to learn it more quickly. During this period, a few linguists discovered some unique features of Jin Chinese that do not exist in other northern Mandarin dialects, planting the seeds for the future independence of Jin Chinese. Finally, in 1985, Li Rong proposed that Jin should be considered a separate top-level dialect group, similar to Yue or Wu. His main criterion was that Jin dialects had preserved the entering tone as a separate category, still marked with a glottal stop as in the Wu dialects, but distinct in this respect from most other Mandarin dialects. Some linguists have adopted this classification. However, others disagree that Jin should be considered a separate dialect group for these reasons:{{sfn|Yan|2006|pp=60–61, 67–69}}{{sfn|Kurpaska|2010|pp=74–75}}

1. Use of the entering tone as a diagnostic feature is inconsistent with the way that all other Chinese dialect groups have been delineated based on the reflexes of the Middle Chinese voiced initials.
2. Certain other Mandarin dialects also preserve the glottal stop, especially the Jianghuai dialects, and so far, no linguist has claimed that these dialects should also be split from Mandarin.

The Language Atlas of China divides Jin into the following eight groups:{{sfn|Kurpaska|2010|p=68}}

File:Jinyufen qu.png

:* {{Interlanguage link|Bingzhou dialect|lt=Bingzhou group|zh|并州片}} ({{Lang-zh|c=并州片}}), spoken in central Shanxi (the ancient Bing Province), including Taiyuan. Most dialects under this group can distinguish the light entering tone from the dark one, with only 1 level tone. In many dialects, especially those to the south of Taiyuan, the voiced obstruents from Middle Chinese become tenuis in all 4 tones, namely {{IPA|[b]}} → {{IPA|[p]}}, {{IPA|[d]}} → {{IPA|[t]}} and {{IPA|[ɡ]}} → {{IPA|[k]}}.

:* {{Interlanguage link|Lüliang dialect|lt=Lüliang group|zh|吕梁片}} ({{Lang-zh|c=呂梁片}}), spoken in western Shanxi (including Lüliang) and northern Shaanxi. Dialects under this group can differentiate light entering tone from dark entering tone. In most dialects, the voiced obstruents from Middle Chinese become aspirated in both level and entering tones, namely {{IPA|[b]}} → {{IPA|[pʰ]}}, {{IPA|[d]}} → {{IPA|[tʰ]}} and {{IPA|[ɡ]}} → {{IPA|[kʰ]}}.

:* {{Interlanguage link|Shangdang dialect|lt=Shangdang group|zh|上党片}} ({{Lang-zh|c=|s=上党片|t=上黨片}}), spoken in the area of Changzhi (ancient Shangdang) in southeastern Shanxi. Dialects under this group can differentiate light entering tone from dark entering tone. The palatalization of velar consonants does not occur in some dialects.

:* {{Interlanguage link|Wutai dialect|lt=Wutai group|zh|五台片}} ({{Lang-zh|c=|s=五台片|t=五臺片}}), spoken in parts of northern Shanxi (including Wutai County) and central Inner Mongolia. A few Dialects under this group can differentiate light entering tone from dark entering tone, while the others cannot. The fusion of the level tone and the rising one occurred in some dialects, though some linguists claim every dialect under this group has this feature.{{Cite journal |last=Fan |first=Huiqin 范慧琴 |title=Jìn yǔ wǔ tái piàn yīn píng hé shàng shēng de fèn hé jí qí yǎn biàn |journal=语文研究 |date=2015 |issue=3 |script-title=zh:晋语五台片阴平和上声的分合及其演变 |trans-title=The separation and combination of level and rising tones in Wutai dialects of Jin Chinese and their evolution |url=https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?DBCode=CJFQ&FileName=YWYJ201503004&DBName=CJFDLAST2015&v=MDAwNDFyQ1VSN2llWnVSc0ZpN25VTHZLUERyU1pMRzRIOVRNckk5RllJUUlCWDFOeWhCbTZrNElUQW1YcmhjeUY= |pages=28–32 |quote={{lang|zh-Hans|文章认为晋语五台片阴平和上声的分合有忻州型和宁武型两个类型，不同类型以及不同方言点的共时差异反映出两个声调的历时演变过程是渐进式的，合流是声调晚期演变的结果，调值相近是合流的直接动因。。}}}}

:* {{Interlanguage link|Da-Bao dialect|lt=Da-Bao group|zh|大包片}} ({{Lang-zh|c=大包片}}), spoken in parts of northern Shanxi and central Inner Mongolia, including Baotou.

:* Zhangjiakou–Hohhot group ({{Lang-zh|c=|s=张呼片|t=張呼片}}), spoken in Zhangjiakou in northwestern Hebei and parts of central Inner Mongolia, including Hohhot.

:* {{Interlanguage link|Han-Xin dialect|lt=Han-Xin group|zh|邯新片}} ({{Lang-zh|c=邯新片}}), spoken in southeastern Shanxi, southern Hebei (including Handan) and northern Henan (including Xinxiang).

:* Zhi-Yan group ({{Lang-zh|c=志延片}}), spoken in Zhidan County and Yanchuan County in northern Shaanxi.

The Taiyuan dialect from the Bingzhou group is sometimes taken as a convenient representative of Jin because many studies of this dialect are available, but most linguists agree that the Taiyuan vocabulary is heavily influenced by Mandarin, making it unrepresentative of Jin.{{Cite web |last=Qiao |first=Quansheng 乔全生 |title=Jìn fāngyán yánjiū de lìshǐ, xiànzhuàng yǔ wèilái |script-title=zh:晋方言研究的历史、现状与未来 |trans-title=The History, Current State and Future of the Research on Jin Chinese |url=https://www1.doshisha.ac.jp/~cjtl210/data1/34_qiaoquansheng.pdf |pages=10 |quote={{lang|zh-Hans|太原方言的词汇与其他方言比较，结果认为晋方言的词汇与官话方言非常接近。}}}} The Lüliang group is usually regarded as the "core" of the Jin language group as it preserves most archaic features of Jin. However, there is no consensus as to which dialect among the Lüliang group is the representative dialect.

Unlike most varieties of Mandarin, Jin has preserved a final glottal stop, which is the remnant of a final stop consonant ({{IPA|/p/}}, {{IPA|/t/}} or {{IPA|/k/}}). This is in common with the Early Mandarin of the Yuan dynasty (c. 14th century AD) and with a number of modern southern varieties of Chinese. In Middle Chinese, syllables closed with a stop consonant had no tone. However, Chinese linguists prefer to categorize such syllables as belonging to a separate tone class, traditionally called the "entering tone". Syllables closed with a glottal stop in Jin are still toneless, or alternatively, Jin can be said to still maintain the entering tone. In standard Mandarin Chinese, syllables formerly ending with a glottal stop have been reassigned to one of the other tone classes in a seemingly random fashion.

• {{IPA|[ŋ]}} is mainly used in finals.

• The nasal consonant sounds may vary between nasal sounds {{IPA|[m, n, ɲ, ɳ, ŋ]}} or prenasalised stop sounds {{IPA|[ᵐb, ⁿd, ᶯɖʐ, ᶮdʲ, ᵑɡ]}}.
• A prenasalised affricated fricative sound {{IPA|/nᵈz/}}, is also present.

• The diphthong {{IPA|/ɤu/}} may also be realized as a monophthong close central vowel {{IPA|[ʉ]}}.
• Sounds ending in the sequence {{IPA|/-aʔ/}} may also be heard as {{IPA|[-ɛʔ]}}, then realized as {{IPA|[ɛʔ, iɛʔ, yɛʔ, uɛʔ]}}.
• {{IPA|/y/}} can also be heard as a labio-palatal approximant {{IPA|[ɥ]}} when preceding initial consonants.
• {{IPA|/i/}} when occurring after alveolar sounds {{IPA|/ts, tsʰ, s/}} can be heard as an alveolar syllabic {{IPA|[ɹ̩]}}, and is heard as a retroflex syllabic {{IPA|[ɻ̩]}} when occurring after retroflex consonants {{IPA|/tʂ, tʂʰ, ʂ, ʐ/}}.

Jin employs extremely complex tone sandhi, or tone changes that occur when words are put together into phrases. The tone sandhi of Jin is notable in two ways among Chinese varieties:

• Tone sandhi rules depend on the grammatical structure of the words being put together. Hence, an adjective–noun compound may go through different sets of changes compared to a verb–object compound.{{cite book |last1=Chen |first1=Matthew |title=Tone Sandhi: Patterns across Chinese Dialects |date=2000 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=0521033403 |pages=93}}
• There are Jin varieties in which the "dark level" tone category (yīnpíng 阴平) and "light level" (yángpíng 阳平) tone have merged in isolation but can still be distinguished in tone sandhi contexts. That is, while e.g. Standard Mandarin has a tonal distinction between Tone 1 and Tone 2, corresponding words in Jin Chinese may have the same tone when pronounced separately. However, these words can still be distinguished in connected speech. For example, in Pingyao Jin, dark level tou 偷 'secretly' and ting 听 'to listen' on the one hand, and light level tao 桃 'peach' and hong 红 'red' on the other hand, all have the same rising tone [˩˧] when pronounced in isolation. Yet, when these words are combined into touting 偷听 'eavesdropping' and taohong 桃红 'peach red', the tonal distinction emerges. In touting, tou has a falling tone [˧˩] and ting has a high-rising tone [˧˥], whereas both syllables in taohong still have the same low-rising tone [˩˧] as in isolation.{{cite book |last1=Chen |first1=Matthew |title=Tone Sandhi: Patterns across Chinese Dialects |date=2000 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=0521033403 |pages=51}}
• According to Guo (1989)Guo, Jianrong 郭建荣 (1989). Xiaoyi fangyan zhi 孝义方言志. Beijing: Yuwen. and also noted by Sagart (1999), the departing (qusheng 去声) tone category in the Jin dialect of Xiaoyi is characterized by -ʰ and a high falling tone [˥˧]. Xiaoyi also lacks a voicing split in the level tone.{{cite journal |last=Sagart |first=Laurent |title=The origin of Chinese tones |journal=Proceedings of the Symposium/Cross-Linguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena/Tonogenesis, Typology and Related Topics |publisher=Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies |date=1999 |url=https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00096904 |access-date=2024-06-15}} The rising (shangsheng 上声) tone in Xiaoyi is also "characterized by a glottal break in the middle of the syllable [˧˩ʔ˩˨]".{{cite journal |last=Sagart |first=Laurent |date=2022-11-15 |title=Audio files of some shangsheng 上声 words in Xiaoyi 孝义 dialect (Shanxi), in the pronunciation of Prof. Guo Jianrong 郭建荣, Oct. 1985 |journal=Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian |publisher=Hypotheses |doi=10.58079/UKDO |url=https://stan.hypotheses.org/2032 |access-date=2024-06-15}}

Jin readily employs prefixes such as {{linktext|lang=zh|圪}} {{IPA|/kəʔ/}}, {{linktext|lang=zh|黑}} {{IPA|/xəʔ/}}, {{linktext|lang=zh|忽}} {{IPA|/xuəʔ/}}, and {{linktext|lang=zh|入}}(日) {{IPA|/ʐəʔ/}}, in a variety of derivational constructions. For example:

{{linktext|lang=zh|入|鬼}} "fool around" < {{linktext|lang=zh|鬼}} "ghost, devil"

In addition, there are a number of words in Jin that evolved, evidently, by splitting a mono-syllabic word into two, adding an 'l' in between (cf. Ubbi Dubbi, but with {{IPA|/l/}} instead of {{IPA|/b/}}). For example:

:{{IPA|/pəʔ ləŋ/}} < {{linktext|lang=zh|蹦}} {{IPA|/pəŋ/}} "hop"

:{{IPA|/tʰəʔ luɤ/}} < {{linktext|lang=zh|拖}} {{IPA|/tʰuɤ/}} "drag"

:{{IPA|/kuəʔ la/}} < {{linktext|lang=zh|刮}} {{IPA|/kua/}} "scrape"

:{{IPA|/xəʔ lɒ̃/}} < {{linktext|lang=zh|巷}} {{IPA|/xɒ̃/}} "street"

A similar process can in fact be found in most Mandarin dialects (e.g. {{linktext|lang=zh|窟窿}} kulong < {{linktext|lang=zh|孔}} kong), but it is especially common in Jin.

This may be a kind of reservation for double-initials in Old Chinese, although this is still controversial. For example, the character {{lang|zh|孔}} (pronounced {{IPA|/kʰoːŋ/}} in Mandarin) which appears more often as {{lang|zh|窟窿}} {{IPA|/kʰuəʔ luŋ/}} in Jin, had the pronunciation like {{IPA|/kʰloːŋ/}} in Old Chinese.{{Citation needed|date=October 2019}}

Some dialects of Jin make a three-way distinction in demonstratives. (Modern English, for example, has only a two-way distinction between "this" and "that", with "yon" being archaic.){{Citation needed|date=September 2023}}

There is considerable lexical diversity in Jin Chinese, with some words having very distinct regional forms. Usually, there are more unique words in the core dialects than in the non-core dialects. Moreover, some cannot be easily represented using Chinese characters.

{{Reflist}}

{{refbegin}}

• {{citation

| author = Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) |author-link = Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

| script-title = zh:中国语言地图集（第2版）：汉语方言卷

| title = Zhōngguó Yǔyán Dìtújí (Dì 2 bǎn): Hànyǔ fāngyán juǎn

| trans-title = Language Atlas of China (2nd Edition): Chinese Dialect Volume

| title-link = Language Atlas of China

| publisher = The Commercial Press | location = Beijing | year = 2012

| ref = {{sfnref|CASS|2012}}

| postscript = .

| language = zh-CN

}}

• {{Citation | last1 = Hou 侯 | first1 = Jingyi 精一 | last2=Shen 沈 | first2 = Ming 明 | editor-last = Hou | editor-first = Jingyi |script-title=zh:现代汉语方言概论 |trans-title = Overview of Modern Chinese Dialects | publisher = Shanghai Education Publishing House | year=2002 | isbn=7-5320-8084-6 | language = zh-CN }}
• {{Citation |last=Kurpaska | first=Maria |title = Chinese Language(s): A Look Through the Prism of The Great Dictionary of Modern Chinese Dialects |publisher = De Gruyter Mouton |year=2010 |isbn=978-3-11-021914-2 }}
• {{citation

| surname = Yan

| given = Margaret Mian

| title = Introduction to Chinese Dialectology

| publisher = LINCOM Europa | year = 2006 | isbn = 978-3-89586-629-6

| postscript = .

}}

{{refend}}

{{incubator|code=cjy}}

• [https://web.archive.org/web/20081227193739/http://www.glossika.com/en/dict/classification/jin/index.php Classification of the Jin Dialects]
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20081227193739/http://www.glossika.com/en/dict/dialectdata/shanxi/pingyao.php Details of the Pingyao Dialect]

{{Sino-Tibetan languages}}

{{Languages of China}}

{{Chinese language}}

Category:Languages of China

Category:Varieties of Chinese