Karin Immergut

{{Infobox officeholder

| name = Karin Immergut

| image = Karin J. Immergut.jpg

| office = Judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

| term_start = May 19, 2024

| term_end =

| appointer = John Roberts

| predecessor = Robert B. Kugler

| successor =

| office1 = Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon

| term_start1 = August 5, 2019

| term_end1 =

| appointer1 = Donald Trump

| predecessor1 = Anna J. Brown

| successor1 =

| office2 = Judge of the Multnomah County Circuit Court

| appointer2 = Ted Kulongoski

| term_start2 = July 2009

| term_end2 = August 5, 2019

| predecessor2 = Dale R. Koch

| successor2 = Steffan Alexander

| office3 = United States Attorney for the District of Oregon

| president3 = George W. Bush
Barack Obama

| term_start3 = October 3, 2003

| term_end3 = July 2009

| predecessor3 = Michael W. Mosman

| successor3 = Dwight Holton

| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1960|12|22}}

| birth_place = New York City, U.S.

| death_date =

| death_place =

| party = Democratic (Before 1998)
Independent (1998–2003)
Republican (2003–present)

| spouse = James McDermott

| education = Amherst College (BA)
University of California, Berkeley (JD)

}}

Karin Johanna Immergut (born December 22, 1960){{cite news| url=https://blogs.wsj.com/law/2006/01/25/karin-immergut-and-patrick-fitzgerald-as-tight-as-the-doj-and-sec/tab/article | work=The Wall Street Journal | title=Karin Immergut & Patrick Fitzgerald: As Tight as the DOJ & SEC | first=Peter | last=Lattman | date=January 25, 2006}} is an American lawyer who has served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon since 2019. She concurrently serves as a judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court since 2024.

Early life and education

Immergut was born in Brooklyn, on December 22, 1960.{{cite journal|last=Collins|first=Cliff|date=February–March 2004|title=Profiles in the Law|journal=Oregon State Bar Bulletin|url=http://www.osbar.org/publications/bulletin/04febmar/profiles.html}} Her father was an Austrian chemist and her mother a Swedish mathematician. Her parents married in Sweden and then immigrated to the United States where Karin was born.

Immergut graduated from Amherst College in 1982 with a Bachelor of Arts. From 1982 to 1984, Immergut was a special assistant at the New York City Departments of Juvenile Justice and Corrections. She then attended the UC Berkeley School of Law, where she was managing editor of the Boalt Hall Journal of Industrial Relations (now Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law). She graduated with a Juris Doctor in 1987.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/download/immergut-sjq&download=1|title=SJC Questionnaire}}{{Dead link|date=March 2025 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}

Career

After law school she worked as a litigation associate at the law firm of Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C., for one year.

Following private practice, Immergut served as an assistant United States attorney for the Central District of California in Los Angeles for six years. During her tenure in the Central District of California, Immergut prosecuted several large-scale complex narcotics trafficking and money laundering cases and served as a deputy chief of the Narcotics Section and chief of the Training Section. She then moved to Burlington, Vermont, to work for the firm Gravel & Shea for two years.

Immergut served for five years as a deputy district attorney in Portland, Oregon, where she primarily prosecuted white collar crimes. In 1998, Immergut was a Multnomah County deputy district attorney when she went to work for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, who was investigating then-President Bill Clinton. Immergut personally questioned Monica Lewinsky in an August 6, 1998, deposition. In 2001, she joined the U.S. Attorney's office in Portland as an assistant U.S. attorney in the District of Oregon. Serving two years in the position, she prosecuted cases involving white collar crime and worked on Project Safe Neighborhoods, a national gun violence reduction initiative.

= U.S. attorney =

File:Karin_Immergut.jpg

Immergut was sworn in as interim United States attorney on October 3, 2003, and the United States Senate confirmed her nomination on that same date. She was appointed by President George W. Bush to the position.{{cite web |url=http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/or/ |title=United States Attorney Karen J. Immergut |publisher= usdoj.gov |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090610193926/http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/or/ |archive-date=June 10, 2009}} Bush signed her commission to serve as the United States Attorney for the District of Oregon on October 4, 2003, and she was sworn in as the United States Attorney on October 8, 2003. She succeeded Michael W. Mosman in that role.

As U.S. Attorney, Immergut served as the district's top federal law enforcement official. She managed a staff of approximately 107 people, including 51 assistant U.S. attorneys, who handled civil litigation on behalf of the United States and criminal investigations and prosecutions involving violations of federal law such as white collar crime, narcotics trafficking, violent crime, money laundering and cybercrime. In addition, Immergut served on the Advisory Committee of U.S. Attorneys.{{cite web|url=http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2004/January/04_usao_003.htm |title=#003: 01-08-04 ATTORNEY GENERAL APPOINTS SIX NEW MEMBERS TO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S 2004 ADVISORY COMMITTEE |publisher=Usdoj.gov |access-date=2018-06-08}}

In January 2008, Immergut applied to succeed Judge Garr King on the United States District Court for Oregon. She was initially considered the leading candidate for the post as the preferred choice of U.S. Senator Gordon H. Smith.{{cite news

|title=Judgment Call

|first=James

|last=Pitkin

|work=Willamette Week

|url=http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-8295-judgment_call.html

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121011150919/http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-8295-judgment_call.html

|url-status=dead

|archive-date=2012-10-11

|date=January 16, 2008

}} But after news reports highlighting her role in the investigation of President Bill Clinton's sex scandal, she was not one of the final candidates for the position, which ultimately Marco A. Hernandez was appointed to.{{cite news

|title=Immergut's Out: The Final Three Who Are In For A Federal Judge Appointment

|first=James

|last=Pitkin

|work=Willamette Week

|url=http://www.wweek.com/portland/blog-9035-immerguts_out_the_final_three_who_are_in_for_a_federal_judge_appointment.html

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121020235840/http://www.wweek.com/portland/blog-9035-immerguts_out_the_final_three_who_are_in_for_a_federal_judge_appointment.html

|archive-date=2012-10-20

|date=January 25, 2008

}} She re-registered as a Republican at the beginning of Bush's first term as President, in the same month that she went to work for Mosman. She resigned from the office in July 2009 in order to be appointed as Multnomah County Circuit Court Judge.{{cite news|url=http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-8295-judgment_call.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121011150919/http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-8295-judgment_call.html|archive-date=2012-10-11|title=U.S. Attorney Karin Immergut Lands on Plan B: Circuit Court Judge|last=Pitkin|first=James|date=May 8, 2009|work=Willamette Week|access-date=February 5, 2010}}

= Federal judicial service =

On June 7, 2018, President Donald Trump announced his intent to nominate Immergut to serve as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-fifteenth-wave-judicial-nominees-fourteenth-wave-united-states-attorney-nominees-ninth-wave-united-states-marshal-nominees/|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Fifteenth Wave of Judicial Nominees, Fourteenth Wave of United States Attorney Nominees, and Ninth Wave of United States Marshal Nominees – The White House|website=trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov}} On June 11, 2018, her nomination was sent to the Senate. President Trump nominated Immergut to the seat vacated by Judge Anna J. Brown, who assumed senior status on July 27, 2017.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/seventeen-nominations-sent-senate-today-3/|title=Seventeen Nominations Sent to the Senate Today – The White House|website=trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov}} On October 24, 2018, a hearing on her nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/10/24/2018/nominations|title=Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|website=www.judiciary.senate.gov|date=October 24, 2018 }}

On January 3, 2019, her nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the United States Senate. On January 23, 2019, President Trump announced his intent to renominate Immergut for a federal judgeship.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-intent-nominate-judicial-nominees/|title=President Donald J. Trump Announces Intent to Nominate Judicial Nominees – The White House|website=trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov}} Her nomination was sent to the Senate later that day.{{Cite web|url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/nominations-sent-senate-2/|title=Nominations Sent to the Senate – The White House|website=trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov}} On February 7, 2019, her nomination was reported out of committee by a 20–2 vote.{{Cite web|url=https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/02.07.2019%20Results%20of%20Executive%20Business%20Meeting1.pdf|title=Results of Executive Business Meeting – February 7, 2019, Senate Judiciary Committee}} On July 31, 2019, the Senate confirmed her nomination by voice vote. She received her judicial commission on August 5, 2019.{{FJC Bio|nid=6839681|inline=yes}}

=Notable decisions=

On June 17, 2021, Immergut granted a preliminary injunction to Olivia Moultrie, ruling that the National Women's Soccer League could not enforce its rule requiring players to be at least 18 years old before signing a professional contract.{{cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/soccer/2021/06/18/court-ruling-allows-15-year-old-olivia-moultrie-sign-nwsl/7745846002/|title=Olivia Moultrie, 15, granted preliminary injunction to sign NWSL contract|author=Reyes, Lorenzo|website=USA Today |date=June 18, 2021|accessdate=December 20, 2024}} Immergut's ruling held that the rule unlawfully "excludes female competitors from the only available professional soccer opportunity in the United States because they are under 18, regardless of talent, maturity, strength, and ability" and, pointing out that Major League Soccer did not have a similar age limit, that "the balance of equities and the public interest strongly favor affording girls in the United States the same opportunities as boys."{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/4209247/2021/06/18/olivia-moultrie-wins-preliminary-injunction-in-fight-against-nwsls-age-rule/|title= Olivia Moultrie wins preliminary injunction in fight against NWSL's age rule|date=June 18, 2021|work=The Athletic|accessdate=December 20, 2024}}

On March 10, 2023, Immergut ruled that Salem police officer Robert Johnston had no way of knowing he violated Eleaqia McCrae's rights when he shot her with rubber bullets at a protest in 2020, a legal principle known as qualified immunity. {{cite web|url=https://www.salemreporter.com/2023/03/17/judges-ruling-could-erase-1-million-city-payout-to-protester-injured-by-officer/|title=Judge's ruling could erase $1 million city payout to protester injured by officer|author=Tabrizian, Ardeshir|date=March 17, 2023|accessdate=September 18, 2024|archivedate=March 17, 2023|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20230317140912/https://www.salemreporter.com/2023/03/17/judges-ruling-could-erase-1-million-city-payout-to-protester-injured-by-officer/}} Immergut overturned a jury's unanimous verdict that Johnston violated McCrae’s Fourth Amendment right not to be subjected to excessive force and erased the jury's decision to award McCrae $250,000 for economic loss and $800,000 in other damages.{{cite web|url=https://www.salemreporter.com/2023/03/24/judge-wipes-out-1-million-city-payout-to-protester-injured-by-officer/|title=Judge wipes out $1 million city payout to protester injured by officer|author=Tabrizian, Ardeshir|date=March 24, 2023|accessdate=September 18, 2024}} On September 16, 2024, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found Immergut was wrong to throw out the jury’s award and that she should not have granted the officer immunity.{{cite web|url=https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2024/09/appeals-court-revives-1-million-jury-award-to-salem-protester-shot-in-the-eye.html|title=Appeals court revives $1 million jury award to Salem protester shot in the eye|author=Bernstein, Maxine|date=September 16, 2024|accessdate=September 18, 2024}}

On July 14, 2023, Immergut upheld Oregon's gun control law, Measure 114, "banning large capacity magazines and requiring a permit to purchase a gun falls in line with “the nation’s history and tradition of regulating uniquely dangerous features of weapons and firearms to protect public safety."{{Cite web|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-judge-rules-oregon-tough-011750148.html|title=Federal judge rules Oregon's tough new gun law is constitutional|website=yahoo.com|date=July 16, 2023 }}