LGBTQ rights in North Carolina

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) held laws criminalizing consensual homosexual activity between adults unconstitutional.New York Times: [https://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/26/politics/26WIRE-SODO.html "Supreme Court Strikes Down Texas Law Banning Sodomy," June 26, 2003], accessed June 28, 2011

In State v. Whiteley (2005), the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled that the crime against nature statute, N.C. G.S. § 14-177,{{cite web |url=http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_14/GS_14-177.html |title=G.S. § 14-177 |publisher=Ncga.state.nc.us |date= |accessdate=2013-12-05}} is not unconstitutional on its face because it may properly be used to criminalize sexual conduct involving minors, non-consensual or coercive conduct, public conduct, and prostitution.[http://law.justia.com/cases/north-carolina/court-of-appeals/2005/040636-1.html State of North Carolina v. Gregory Paul Whiteley], Retrieved 15 April 2016

The state's sodomy law, though unenforceable, has not been repealed.{{cite news |last=Chibbaro Jr. |first=Lou |title=Sodomy laws remain on books in 17 states, including Md. and Va. |url=http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/04/17/sodomy-laws-remain-on-books-in-17-states-including-md-and-va/ |accessdate=May 24, 2013 |newspaper=Washington Blade |date=April 17, 2013}}

{{Main|Same-sex marriage in North Carolina}}

North Carolina has recognized same-sex marriages since October 14, 2014, when a federal court decision found the state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples unconstitutional. The state formerly banned same-sex marriage and all other types of same-sex unions both by statute and by constitutional amendment until the ban was overturned by a federal court decision.

North Carolina had previously denied marriage rights to same-sex couples by statute since 1996. A state constitutional amendment that was approved in 2012 reinforced that by defining marriage between a man and a woman as the only valid "domestic legal union" in the state and denying recognition to any similar legal status, such as civil unions.

Image:County-by-county results of vote on North Carolina Amendment 1.png

In September 2011, the North Carolina General Assembly passed North Carolina Senate Bill 514 (2011) which put an amendment banning any form of same-sex unions on the primary election ballot in May 2012. The measure passed on a vote of 30–16 in the state Senate and a vote of 74–42 in the state House.{{cite web |title=Senate Bill 514 / S.L. 2011-409 |url=http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2011&BillID=S514&votesToView=all |work=NCGA website |publisher=North Carolina General Assembly |accessdate=13 December 2011}}

Voters approved the amendment by 61% to 39% on May 8, 2012. North Carolina was the 30th state, and the last of the former Confederate states, to adopt a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. The amendment added to Section XVI of the Constitution of North Carolina:[http://www2.mcdowellnews.com/news/2012/may/08/23/marriage-amendment-ar-2257474/ "Marriage Amendment passes in North Carolina by double-digits," The McDowell News], mcdowellnews.com, 9 May 2012, accessed 9 May 2012

{{blockquote|Marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State. This section does not prohibit a private party from entering into contracts with another private party; nor does this section prohibit courts from adjudicating the rights of private parties pursuant to such contracts.}}

{{See also|Same-sex marriage in North Carolina#Lawsuits}}

;General Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Cooper

On April 28, 2014, the United Church of Christ and other religious organizations filed General Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Cooper, arguing that North Carolina's statute that makes it a crime to preside at the solemnization of the marriage of a couple that lacks a valid state marriage license unconstitutionally restricts religious freedom.{{cite news |title=North Carolina's Gay-Marriage Ban Is Challenged by Church |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/29/us/churchs-lawsuit-challenges-north-carolina-ban-on-same-sex-marriage.html |work=New York Times |date=28 April 2014 |accessdate=June 4, 2014|last1=Paulson |first1=Michael }} On October 10, District Court Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. ruled the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional.{{cite news |last1=Snow |first1=Justin |title=Federal judge strikes down North Carolina same-sex marriage ban |url=http://www.metroweekly.com/2014/10/federal-judge-strikes-down-north-carolina-same-sex-marriage-ban/ |accessdate=October 10, 2014 |work=Metro Weekly |date=October 10, 2014}}

;Fisher-Borne v. Smith and Gerber v. Cooper

On June 13, 2012, six same-sex couples filed a federal lawsuit, Fisher-Borne v. Smith, that initially sought the right to obtain second-parent adoptions. In July 2013, following the U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor in June, they amended their suit to challenge the constitutionality of the state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples.{{cite news |title=Gay marriage cases in 5 states offer broad view |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/gay-marriage-cases-in-5-states-offer-broad-view/2014/01/16/75419c56-7ec0-11e3-97d3-b9925ce2c57b_story.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190204122429/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/gay-marriage-cases-in-5-states-offer-broad-view/2014/01/16/75419c56-7ec0-11e3-97d3-b9925ce2c57b_story.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 4, 2019 |accessdate=January 20, 2014 |newspaper=Washington Post |date=January 16, 2014}} Briefing was completed on August 13, 2014.{{cite web |url=http://www.lambdalegal.org/pending-marriage-equality-cases?state=NC |accessdate=August 24, 2014 |title=Pending Marriage Equality Cases: North Carolina}} On April 9, 2014, the American Civil Liberties Union filed Gerber v. Cooper in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, seeking state recognition of same-sex marriages established outside of North Carolina. Plaintiffs are three couples: Ginter-Mejia and Esmeralda Mejia, Jane Blackburn and Lyn McCoy, Pearl Berlin and Ellen W. Gerber. A judge has not yet been assigned in this case.{{cite web |url=http://dockets.justia.com/docket/north-carolina/ncmdce/1:2014cv00299/65577 |title=GERBER et al v. COOPER et al |publisher=Justia.com |date=April 9, 2014 |accessdate=August 23, 2014}} On October 14, U.S. District Judge William Osteen ruled for the plaintiffs.{{cite web |title=Order Enjoining North Carolina from enforcing marriage bans. |url=https://www.scribd.com/doc/243001005/1-12-cv-00589-135 |publisher=U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |accessdate=October 14, 2014}}

File:North Carolina counties and cities with domestic partnerships.svg either county-wide or in particular cities.

{{legend|#28db24|City offers domestic partner benefits}}

{{legend|#dfffa5|County-wide partner benefits through domestic partnership}}

{{legend|#d0d0d0|County or city does not offer domestic partner benefits}}]]

The counties of Durham,{{cite web |url=http://www.durhamcountync.gov/departments/bocc/Agendas/Archives/2003/9-2-03.html |title=9:00 A.M. Worksession - Agenda |publisher=Durham County Government |quote=In conjunction with the County Attorney's legal opinion that only same-sex domestic partner benefits can be offered to County employees without the violation of the Commissioners' oaths of office, the Human Resources Department has completed the actions necessary to make this offering possible. |date=September 2, 2003 |accessdate=April 4, 2012}} Orange,{{cite web |url=http://www.unmarriedamerica.org/members/news/2003/December-DP/Oc_NC_to_offer_partner_benefits.html |title=Orange County, NC To Offer Partner Benefits |date=December 1, 2003 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140820182356/http://www.unmarriedamerica.org/members/news/2003/December-DP/Oc_NC_to_offer_partner_benefits.html |archivedate=August 20, 2014 |url-status=dead}} Mecklenburg,{{cite web |url=http://sogpubs.unc.edu/electronicversions/pdfs/pelb37.pdf |title=North Carolina County Passes Domestic Partner Benefits Despite Defamatory Comments from Commissioner Bill James |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20201020151442/https://www.glaad.org/2009/12/22/north-carolina-county-passes-domestic-partner-benefits-despite-defamatory-comments-from-commissioner-bill-james |archivedate=October 20, 2020 |url-status=dead}} and Buncombe;{{cite web |url=http://www.citizenlink.com/2013/03/26/north-carolina-family-policy-council-buncombe-domestic-partner-benefits/ |title=North Carolina Family Policy Council: Buncombe Domestic Partner Benefits |date=March 22, 2013 |accessdate=June 7, 2013}} the cities of Durham,{{cite web |url=http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1090052/ |title=Durham Votes to Allow Benefits for Domestic Partners |date=April 7, 2003 |publisher=WRAL-TV |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140820194220/http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1090052/ |archivedate=August 20, 2014 |url-status=dead}} Greensboro,{{cite web |url=http://sogpubs.unc.edu/electronicversions/pdfs/pelb37.pdf |title=May North Carolina Local Government Employers Offer Domestic Partner Benefits? |publisher=University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |quote=In North Carolina, only Durham and Orange counties, the cities of Durham and Greensboro, and the towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro offer domestic partner benefits. |date=November 2009 |accessdate=April 4, 2012}} Asheville,{{cite web |url=http://www.ashevillenc.gov/NewsandEvents/CityNews/tabid/662/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/27046/Domestic-Partner-Registry-available-May-2.aspx |title=Domestic Partner Registry Available May 2 |date=April 27, 2011 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111006123456/http://ashevillenc.gov/NewsandEvents/CityNews/tabid/662/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/27046/Domestic-Partner-Registry-available-May-2.aspx |archivedate=October 6, 2011 |url-status=dead}} and Charlotte;[http://goqnotes.com/15605/charlotte-council-approves-domestic-partner-benefits-scraps-capital-plan/ Charlotte council approves domestic partner benefits, scraps capital plan ] and the towns of Carrboro{{cite web |url=http://www.ci.carrboro.nc.us/TC/PDFs/TownCode/TownCodeCh03.pdf |title=Carrboro Town Code: Chapter 3. Section 3-2.1 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130408183624/http://www.ci.carrboro.nc.us/tc/PDFs/TownCode/TownCodeCh03.pdf |archivedate=April 8, 2013 |url-status=dead}} and Chapel Hill{{cite web |url=http://www.ci.chapel-hill.nc.us/index.aspx?page=152 |title=Town of Chapel Hill: General Policies |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120512150921/http://www.ci.chapel-hill.nc.us/index.aspx?page=152 |archivedate=May 12, 2012 |url-status=dead}} have established domestic partnership registries.

In 2008, the North Carolina General Assembly added a provision to the Patients' Bill of Rights affording hospital visitation rights to same-sex couples though a designated visitor statute.[http://goqnotes.com/89/state-ensures-gay-hospital-visitation-rights/ State ensures gay hospital visitation rights ]

Some lower courts allowed second-parent adoptions until the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled 5–2 in 2010 in the case of Boseman v. Jarell that the state law did not permit adoption by a second unmarried person irrespective of the sex of those involved.[http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/family_law/2010/12/second-parent-adoption-struck-down-by-north-carolina-supreme-court.html Family Law Prof Blog, "Second Parent Adoption Struck Down by North Carolina Supreme Court," December 22, 2010], accessed June 15, 2012 The plaintiff in that case was Julia Boseman, first openly gay member of the state legislature. On June 13, 2012, 11 same-sex couples sued several state and local officials in federal court seeking second-parent adoption rights.New York Daily News: [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/aclu-sues-north-carolina-same-sex-adoption-ban-article-1.1095622 "ACLU sues North Carolina over same-sex adoption ban," June 14, 2012], accessed June 15, 2012 In 2013 they amended their suit to challenge the constitutionality of the state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples. On October 14, U.S. District Judge William Osteen ruled for the plaintiffs.

In November 2021, it was reported that the Governor of North Carolina Roy Cooper signed a bill into law legally banning discrimination — explicitly listing sexual orientation within foster parenting placements. The law went into effect from January 1, 2022.{{Cite web|url=https://www.reflector.com/several-new-bills-signed-into-law-by-gov-cooper/article_29b00d79-6363-5ac1-8ac8-e3588b5d525b.html|title = Several new bills signed into law by Gov. Cooper| date=4 November 2021 }}

{{Further|LGBT employment discrimination in the United States}}

State law previously banned local municipalities from prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in areas other than public employment, but this ban expired on December 1, 2020.Human Rights Campaign: [http://www.hrc.org/1142.htm North Carolina Non-Discrimination Law], accessed June 28, 2011{{Cite web|url=http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2015E2/Bills/House/PDF/H2v1.pdf|title=General Assembly of North Carolina Second Extra Session 2016|last=|first=|date=|website=|access-date=2019-11-22}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article67845317.html|title=N.C. Gov Pat McCrory signs into law bill restricting LGBT protections|last=|first=|date=|website=|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160324230255/http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article67845317.html|archive-date=2016-03-24|access-date=2019-11-22}}{{Cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/north-carolinas-controversial-anti-lgbt-bill-explained/story?id=37898153|title=North Carolina's Controversial Anti-LGBT Bill Explained|website=ABC News|language=en|access-date=2019-11-22}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rushed-vote-draws-north-carolina-national-fight-over-lgbt-rights-n545196|title=A Rushed Vote Draws North Carolina Into National Fight Over LGBT Rights|website=NBC News|date=25 March 2016 |language=en|access-date=2019-11-22}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/24/us/north-carolina-to-limit-bathroom-use-by-birth-gender.html|title=North Carolina Bans Local Anti-Discrimination Policies|last=Philipps|first=Dave|date=2016-03-23|work=The New York Times|access-date=2019-11-22|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.wral.com/last-vestige-of-nc-s-notorious-hb2-ban-on-local-nondiscrimination-ordinances-quietly-ends/19411254/|title=Last vestige of NC's notorious HB2 - ban on local nondiscrimination ordinances - quietly ends|newspaper=Wral.com|date=2 December 2020|language=en-US|access-date=2020-12-03}}

The counties of Buncombe,{{cite web |url=http://www.buncombecounty.org/common/personnel/PersonnelOrdinanceManual.pdf |title=Personnel Ordinance |publisher=Buncombe County, North Carolina |quote=Amended 4/16/2013 to include sexual orientation and gender identity |date=August 7, 2012 |accessdate=October 16, 2013 |archive-date=October 17, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017063127/http://www.buncombecounty.org/common/personnel/PersonnelOrdinanceManual.pdf |url-status=dead }} Mecklenburg,{{cite news |url=http://goqnotes.com/25492/mecklenburg-commissioners-vote-to-add-transgender-protections/ |title=Mecklenburg commissioners vote to add transgender protections |first=Matt |last=Comer |publisher=Q-Notes |date=October 16, 2013 |accessdate=October 16, 2013}} and Orange and the cities of Asheville,{{cite web |url=http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/NorthCarolina.pdf |title=North Carolina – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination |publisher=UCLA School of Law |date=September 2009 |accessdate=May 25, 2013 |archive-date=November 27, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141127102637/http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/NorthCarolina.pdf |url-status=dead }} Boone, Carrboro, Chapel Hill, Charlotte,{{cite news |url=http://goqnotes.com/19655/transgender-protections-added-to-charlotte-personnel-policy/ |title=Transgender protections added to Charlotte personnel policy |first=Matt |last=Comer |publisher=Q-Notes |date=December 14, 2012 |accessdate=October 16, 2013}} Greensboro,[http://www.news-record.com/news/greensboro-first-in-n-c-to-ok-sexual-orientation-gender/article_1b5c43dc-9605-11e4-8ac9-ffeead225773.html Greensboro first in N.C. to OK sexual orientation, gender identity housing protections ] Raleigh,{{cite news |url=http://equalitync.org/latest/news/raleigh_votes_to_protect_transgender_workers/ |title=BREAKING: Raleigh Votes to Protect Transgender Workers |date=October 21, 2014 |publisher=Equality NC}} and Winston-Salem{{cite web |url=https://journalnow.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/anti-discrimination-rules-now-apply-to-businesses-inside-winston-salem/article_387a228e-feba-11eb-b592-374bc9e211f9.html |title= Anti-discrimination Rules Now Apply to Businesses Inside Winston-Salem |publisher=Winston-Salem Journal |quote= The Winston-Salem City Council on Monday approved public accommodation and employment protections for LGBTQ people and members of other protected classes, extending rules to the private sector… |date=August 16, 2021 |accessdate=January 11, 2021}} prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in local public employment. The counties of Durham and Guilford along with the cities of Bessemer City, Durham,{{cite web |url=http://ww2.durhamnc.gov/HR_Director/recruit/pdf/HRM_301.pdf |title=Recruitment and Selection |publisher=City of Durham |quote=It is the policy of the City of Durham to assure that equal employment opportunity is afforded to all without regard to ... sexual orientation |date=July 19, 2012 |accessdate=May 25, 2013}}, and High Point prohibit local public discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation only.

The University of North Carolina system, which comprises North Carolina's 16 public universities, established a policy of non-discrimination with regard to sexual orientation and gender identity in employment and for students,{{cite web |title=Policy on Student Conduct |url=http://www.northcarolina.edu/policy/index.php?pg=vs&id=s7166 |website=University of North Carolina |accessdate=June 26, 2020 |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20130616152102/http://www.northcarolina.edu/policy/index.php?pg=vs&id=s7166 |archivedate=2013-06-16 |date=February 12, 2010 |url-status=dead}} which is now in partially in conflict with the Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act.{{Cite web|url=http://equalitync.org/latest/news/federal_judge_blocks_hb2/|title = We're Sorry}}

Appalachian State University, Fayetteville State University, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, North Carolina Central University, North Carolina State University, University of North Carolina at Asheville, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, and University of North Carolina at Pembroke have established non-discrimination policies that cover sexual orientation and gender identity in employment and admissions.{{citation needed|date=May 2013}} East Carolina University, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, University of North Carolina School of the Arts, Western Carolina University, and Winston-Salem State University have established non-discrimination policies that cover sexual orientation in employment and admissions.{{citation needed|date=May 2013}} Elizabeth City State University is the only public university in North Carolina that has not established a non-discrimination policy in respect to either sexual orientation or gender identity for employees or students.

The North Carolina Housing Finance Agency has a policy which provides "all employees and applicants for employment with equal employment opportunities, without regard to race, color, religion, creed, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, age, disability, political affiliation, or any other protected status".{{cite web |url=http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/NorthCarolina.pdf |title=North Carolina – Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Documentation of Discrimination |publisher=UCLA School of Law |date=September 2009 |accessdate=May 23, 2013 |archive-date=November 27, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141127102637/http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/NorthCarolina.pdf |url-status=dead }}{{update inline|date=August 2016}}

On June 26, 2014, the North Carolina House of Representatives passed by a 115–0 vote for an amendment to bill that prohibits discrimination in charter schools on the basis of any "category protected under the United States Constitution or under federal law applicable to the states." The amendment was later removed in the North Carolina State Senate and not included in the final bill signed into law.{{Cite web |url=http://www.ncleg.net/Applications/BillLookUp/LoadBillDocument.aspx?SessionCode=2013&DocNum=9230&SeqNum=0 |title=Senate Bill 793 |access-date=2014-08-19 |archive-date=2014-08-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140819103137/http://www.ncleg.net/Applications/BillLookUp/LoadBillDocument.aspx?SessionCode=2013&DocNum=9230&SeqNum=0 |url-status=dead }}{{Cite web|url=https://www.ncleg.gov/BillLookup/2013/s793|title=Senate Bill 793 (2013-2014 Session) - North Carolina General Assembly|website=www.ncleg.gov|access-date=2019-11-22}}{{Cite web |url=http://nclbc.com/2014/07/charter-school-bill-loses-lgbt-protections/ |title=Charter school bill loses LGBT protections |access-date=2014-08-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140819103115/http://nclbc.com/2014/07/charter-school-bill-loses-lgbt-protections/ |archive-date=2014-08-19 |url-status=dead }}

On April 12, 2016, North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory signed an Executive Order outlawing LGBT discrimination in any public employment within the state,{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbs17.com/news/mccrory-issues-executive-order-on-house-bill-2-adds-protections-for-gays-and-transgender-people/|title=McCrory issues executive order on House Bill 2, adds protections for gays and transgender people|date=2016-04-12|website=CBS17.com|language=en-US|access-date=2019-11-22}} though it did not impact the controversial HB2 legislation.{{Cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/04/pat-mccrory-north-carolina-hb2/477936/|title=Pat McCrory's New Executive Order Doesn't Do Much, but It Shows He's Worried|last=Graham|first=David A.|date=2016-04-12|website=The Atlantic|language=en-US|access-date=2019-11-22}}

In October 2017, Governor Roy Cooper extended this discrimination protection to businesses that contract with the state.{{Cite web|url=https://www.witn.com/content/news/Cooper-signs-executive-order-protecting-LGBT-residents-from-discrimination-451493723.html|title=Cooper signs executive order protecting LGBT residents from discrimination|last=WITN|website=www.witn.com|date=18 October 2017 |language=english|access-date=2019-11-22}}{{Cite web|url=https://governor.nc.gov/news/governor-cooper-signs-non-discrimination-executive-order-nc|title=NC Gov. Cooper: Governor Cooper Signs Non-Discrimination Executive Order for NC|website=governor.nc.gov|access-date=2019-11-22}}

{{Main|Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act}}

Passed in March 2016, the law also known as "HB2" prevents local governments from enacting policies contrary to state law in regards to hiring and use of bathroom facilities, and requires all people to use the bathroom of the gender listed on the person's birth certificate. The portion of the law regarding bathroom use based on gender at birth was repealed by the state legislature on March 30, 2017, and signed into law by North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper the very same day.{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/30/politics/north-carolina-hb2-agreement/index.html|title=North Carolina repeals 'bathroom bill'|author1=Jason Hanna |author2=Madison Park |author3=Eliott C. McLaughlin|website=CNN|date=30 March 2017|access-date=2019-11-22}}

{{Main|House Bill 142 (Session 2017 of the North Carolina General Assembly)}}

In August 2021, a local ordinance was passed within the city of Charlotte to explicitly outlaw and ban discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity. It goes into legal effect from January 1, 2022.{{Cite web|last=Browning|first=Bil|title=After years of delay & billions of dollars, Charlotte NC finally passes LGBTQ nondiscrimination law|url=https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2021/08/years-delay-billions-dollars-charlotte-nc-finally-passes-lgbtq-nondiscrimination-law/|access-date=2021-08-30|website=LGBTQ Nation|date=10 August 2021 }}{{Cite web|url=https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/08/11/bathroom-bill-north-carolina/|title=Five years after abhorrent anti-trans bathroom bill, city passes sweeping LGBT+ protections|date=11 August 2021}}{{Cite web|last=Kelley|first=Alexandra|date=2021-08-10|title=Five years after notorious 'bathroom bill,' Charlotte votes for LGBTQ+ protections|url=https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/diversity-inclusion/567234-five-years-after-notorious-bathroom-bill|access-date=2021-08-30|website=TheHill|language=en}}

In September 2021, a Catholic school fired a gay teacher back in 2014 and a federal judge ordered that he be reinstated immediately - because legally Catholic schools can't fire gay teachers under federal jurisdiction. This case will possibly be appealed in higher courts (and maybe as far as the Supreme Court of the United States).{{Cite web|url=https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2021/09/catholic-schools-cant-fire-teachers-gay-federal-court-rules/|title = Catholic schools can't fire teachers for being gay, federal court rules| date=6 September 2021 }}

In October 2021, Wake County passed a legal ordinance to explicitly legally ban discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity.{{Cite web|url=https://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2021/10/20/raleigh-joins-wake-county-in-new-non-discrimination-protections/|title = Raleigh joins Wake County in new non-discrimination protections|date = 20 October 2021}} About 30% of the North Carolina population is now legally protected from discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity by locally enforced ordinances.

North Carolina's hate crime statute does not cover sexual orientation or gender identity.Human Rights Campaign: [http://www.hrc.org/1138.htm North Carolina Hate Crimes Law], accessed June 28, 2011

In January 2021, a federal judge struck down the last US state law — North Carolina — that did not recognise same-sex domestic violence. Domestic violence protection laws are now extended to include same-sex couples.{{Cite web|title=LGBTQ people can finally get domestic violence protections in NC, court rules|url=https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article248195975.html|access-date=2021-08-30|website=Charlotte Observer|language=en}}{{Cite web|title=LGBTQ people now eligible for domestic violence protections in all 50 states|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/lgbtq-people-now-eligible-domestic-violence-protections-all-50-states-n1252989|access-date=2021-08-30|website=NBC News|date=6 January 2021 |language=en}}

{{See also|List of U.S. jurisdictions banning conversion therapy}}

On August 3, 2019, the North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper signed an executive order within his office - explicitly banning any state funding of conversion therapy on minors. This is the first time a southern US state has done this.{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/n-carolina-first-south-ban-state-funding-conversion-therapy-n1038846|title = N. Carolina is first in South to ban state funding for conversion therapy|website = NBC News| date=2 August 2019 }}{{Cite web|url=https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/democratic-governor-signs-order-ending-funding-for-conversion-therapy/|title = NC Gov. Bans Funding for LBGTQ Youth 'Conversion Therapy'|date = 2 August 2019}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.out.com/politics/2019/8/03/north-carolina-just-defunded-conversion-therapy-minors|title = North Carolina Just Defunded Conversion Therapy on Minors|date = 3 August 2019}}

On August 16, 2023, the legislature voted to override the governor's veto, and three new laws took effect immediately. They govern:{{Cite web |last=Migdon |first=Brooke |date=2023-08-16 |title=North Carolina Legislature overrides vetoes of bills targeting transgender health care, athletes |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4156088-north-carolina-legislature-overrides-vetoes-of-bills-targeting-transgender-health-care-athletes/ |access-date=2023-08-19 |website=The Hill |language=en-US}}{{Cite news |last1=Javaid |first1=Maham |last2=Parks |first2=Casey |date=2023-08-18 |title=N.C.'s new anti-trans laws sow confusion around gender-affirming care |language=en-US |newspaper=Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/08/18/ncs-new-anti-trans-laws-sow-confusion-around-gender-affirming-care/ |access-date=2023-08-19 |issn=0190-8286}}

• requiring educators to notify parents if a student requests that they use a different name or set of pronouns
• trans girls banned playing team sports
• gender-affirming care for transgender minors banned

In August 2023, laws were implemented to explicitly ban transgender individuals assigned male at birth from participating in female sports and athletic teams within the state.{{cite web | url=https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4156088-north-carolina-legislature-overrides-vetoes-of-bills-targeting-transgender-health-care-athletes/ | title=North Carolina Legislature overrides vetoes of bills targeting transgender health care, athletes | date=16 August 2023 }}

On June 26, 2022, a federal judge ruled that gender-affirming surgery was no longer required for North Carolina changes to the gender marker on North Carolina birth certificates.{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/equality/3534553-transgender-people-in-north-carolina-no-longer-required-to-provide-proof-of-surgery-to-correct-birth-certificates/|title = Transgender people in North Carolina no longer required to provide proof of surgery to correct birth certificates|website = The Hill| date=23 June 2022 }} This was the result of a lawsuit filed by Lambda Legal in November 2021; the lawsuit had complained that the existing law required "sex reassignment surgery" without defining it.{{Cite web |last=Avery |first=Dan |date=16 November 2021 |title=Lawsuit challenges surgery requirement for N.C. Birth certificate change |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/lawsuit-challenges-surgery-requirement-nc-birth-certificate-change-rcna5782 |access-date=9 February 2023 |website=NBC News}}

Effective August 15, 2023, SB49, known as the Parents' Bill of Rights, was adopted under the guise of fostering increased parental involvement in their children's education and more oversight for educators and their choice of instructional material. The bill includes:

• A ban on instruction of gender identity, sexual activity, or sexuality in grades kindergarten through fourth grade, regardless of whether the information is provided by school personnel or third parties. Curriculum includes the standard course of study and support materials, locally developed curriculum, supplemental instruction, and textbooks and other supplementary materials, but does not include responses to student-initiated questions.
• Required notification of a parent if a child requests to go by a different name or pronoun in school records or by school personnel.
• The right for parents to inspect and object to instructional materials.{{Cite web |date=August 16, 2023 |title=North Carolina Senate Bill 49 |url=https://www.ncleg.gov/Sessions/2023/Bills/Senate/PDF/S49v4.pdf |website=North Carolina General Assembly}}

Since August 2023, minors cannot be prescribed puberty blockers or hormone therapy or receive gender-affirming surgery.

• Law of North Carolina

{{reflist|2}}

{{LGBT rights in the United States}}

Category:LGBTQ rights in North Carolina