List of District of Columbia ballot measures

{{Short description|None}}

{{Use mdy dates|date=November 2022}}

{{Elections in the District of Columbia sidebar}}

The District of Columbia (a political division coterminous with Washington, D.C.)The district has had a system of direct voting since 1979, shortly after it gained home rule in 1973. Residents have the ability to place new legislation, or legislation recently passed by the city council, on the ballot for a popular vote. The district has three types of ballot measures that can be voted on in a general election: District Charter amendments, initiatives and referendums. In order to be placed on the ballot, supporters of a measure must gather signatures from registered voters.{{Cite web |title=Initiative Measures and Referenda |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://www.dcboe.org/Ballot-Measures/Initiative-Measures |access-date=2022-12-24}}

Since adopting this process, ballot measures have become a common part of the city's electoral system. {{As of|2022|post=,}} more than 150 different initiatives had been filed with the district, along with a significantly smaller number of referendums; of those, only 29 have met the required qualifications to be placed on the ballot.{{cite report |title=Master Initiative and Initiative Measure List |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://www.dcboe.org/getattachment/Ballot-Measures/Initiative-Measures/MASTER-INITIATIVE-AND-INITIATIVE-MEASURE-LIST-wtih-hyperlinks-(2-27-19).pdf.aspx?lang=en-US |access-date=2022-12-24}}{{cite report |title=Master Referendum List |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://www.dcboe.org/getattachment/Ballot-Measures/Initiative-Measures/MASTER-REFERENDUM-LIST-3-20-19.pdf.aspx?lang=en-US |access-date=2022-12-24}} Ballot measures have been used to legalize politically contentious policies such as local term limits, abolition of the tipped minimum wage, cannabis use, and advancements in the District of Columbia statehood movement.

Background

Since the late 1800s, the residents of the District of Columbia have campaigned for control over their own affairs. In a substantial leap forward, the United States Congress passed the District of Columbia Home Rule Act in 1973, which devolved some of its powers to the city.{{cite web |title=D.C. Home Rule |publisher=Council of the District of Columbia |url=https://dccouncil.gov/dc-home-rule/ |access-date=2022-12-23}} Just a few years later in 1979, the newly formed city council passed the Initiative, Referendum, and Recall Procedures Act.{{Cite web |title=Recall Process |url=https://www.dcboe.org/Ballot-Measures/Recall-Process |access-date=2022-10-27 |website=District of Columbia Board of Elections}} This act created a process of direct democracy in which residents could enact their own laws or repeal existing laws.

File:DC Cannabis Campaign volunteer 2014.JPG]]

The prominence of ballot measures has allowed Washington, D.C., to lead the nation in social issues. In 2014, residents approved Initiative 71, which legalized cannabis for recreational use, making the district the third U.S. jurisdiction behind Colorado and Washington state.{{cite news |last=Davis |first=Aaron C. |title=D.C. Voters Overwhelmingly Support Legalizing Marijuana, Joining Colo., Wash. |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=2014-11-04 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-voters-titling-heavily-toward-legalizing-marijuana-likely-joining-colo-wash/2014/11/04/116e83f8-60fe-11e4-9f3a-7e28799e0549_story.html |access-date=2022-12-24 |url-access=limited}} The Entheogenic Plant and Fungus Policy Act of 2020 made the city the fourth U.S. jurisdiction to decriminalize entheogens.{{cite news |title=Initiative 81 Passes in the District of Columbia |date=2020-12-01 |publisher=Bruckheim & Patel |url=https://www.brucklaw.com/initiative-81-passes-dc/ |access-date=2022-12-24 |quote=D.C. will join Denver, Colorado, as well as Oakland and Santa Cruz, California, where laws are in place to decriminalize psychoactive plants and fungi.}} In 2022, voters approved Initiative 82, which eliminates the tipped minimum wage over five years, after an earlier initiative ultimately failed. It joined eight states in abolishing the practice.{{cite news |last=Gomez |first=Amanda Michelle |title=D.C. Voters Approve Measure Phasing Out the Tipped Minimum Wage |work=DCist |date=2022-11-08 |url=https://dcist.com/story/22/11/08/initiative-82-approved/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221109030855/https://dcist.com/story/22/11/08/initiative-82-approved/ |url-status=live |archive-date=November 9, 2022 |access-date=2022-12-24}}

Residents have also used ballot measures to expand their voting rights and (by extension) campaign for admitting the District of Columbia into the Union as the 51st state. An initiative in 1980 directed the D.C. government to begin the process of moving towards statehood due to the stalled and limited-in-scope voting rights amendment. Voters made the Attorney General for the District of Columbia an elected office beginning in 2014. An advisory referendum in 2016 showed that nearly 90 percent of residents support statehood, and it directed the D.C. Council to make formal statehood petitions to Congress.{{cite news |last=Hersher |first=Rebecca |title=D.C. Votes Overwhelmingly To Become 51st State |work=NPR |date=2016-11-09 |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/09/501412360/d-c-votes-overwhelmingly-to-become-51st-state |access-date=2022-12-24}}

Types of ballot measures

= District Charter amendments =

District Charter amendments are changes to the District of Columbia Home Rule Charter, the law that established the D.C. government and its authority.{{cite web |title=D.C. Home Rule |publisher=Council of the District of Columbia |url=https://dccouncil.gov/dc-home-rule/ |access-date=2023-01-19}} They require a majority vote to pass the D.C. Council, a majority of voters to approve the amendment, and then are submitted to Congress for a 35-business day congressional review period. If Congress does not pass a resolution of disapproval, the amendment is adopted.Code of the District of Columbia [https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/1-203.03 § 1–203.03.] Retrieved January 19, 2023.

=Initiatives=

  • Initiatives are measures placed on the ballot and, if passed, directly become law. They must meet specific requirements under the District Charter, including not authorizing discrimination or appropriating funds. In order to place an initiative or referendum on the ballot, supporters must file a proposal with the District of Columbia Board of Elections. Upon approval, there is a 10-day challenge period before supporters can begin gathering signatures. To be placed on the ballot, signatures equal to five percent of registered voters must be gathered.{{Cite web |title=Initiative Measures & Referenda |url=https://www.dcboe.org/Ballot-Measures/Initiative-Measures |access-date=2022-10-27 |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections}}

=Referendums=

There are two types of referendums in the District of Columbia:

  • Referendums are measures that seek to overturn or repeal laws recently-enacted by the D.C. government. Referendums are subject to the same requirements as initiatives.
  • Advisory referendums are questions to gauge public opinion on a potential action of the D.C. Council.Code of the District of Columbia [https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/1-204.12 § 1–204.12.(b)] Retrieved January 19, 2023.

Barriers to enactment

The D.C. government has concluded that approved ballot measures become self-enacting{{snd}}meaning the government does not need to take action, such as an approving signature or proclamation, for the measure to take effect.{{cite web |last=Lopez |first=German |title=Despite Congressional Threats, DC Council Is Definitely Moving Forward on Legal Marijuana |publisher=Vox |date=2015-01-14 |url=https://www.vox.com/2015/1/14/7548003/dc-council-marijuana-legalization |access-date=2022-12-24}} However, many approved ballot measures have been invalidated by either the D.C. Council or Congress, much to the frustration of residents.

=D.C. Council=

The Initiative, Referendum, and Recall Procedures Act gives the D.C. Council the power to reverse voter-approved initiatives, as it did in 2001 regarding term limits and in 2019 regarding the tipped minimum wage.{{Cite web |last=Chan |first=Sewell |date=2008-10-01 |title=When a City Council Repealed Term Limits |url=https://archive.nytimes.com/cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/when-a-city-council-repealed-term-limits/ |access-date=2022-10-27 |website=The New York Times}}{{Cite news |last=Nirappil |first=Fenit |date=2018-10-02 |title=D.C. Council overturns wage hike for bartenders, servers — four months after voters approved it |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-council-takes-initial-vote-to-overturn-initiative-77-four-months-after-voters-approved-it/2018/10/02/da906320-c651-11e8-b1ed-1d2d65b86d0c_story.html |access-date=2022-10-27 |newspaper=The Washington Post}}

=Congressional intervention=

Congress has ultimate authority over the district, including its budget. As a result, members of Congress, who do not represent the district and are not accountable to them, often add little-noticed clauses and amendments to the budget in order to manipulate or block the implementation of the city's laws.{{cite web |title=Democracy Held Hostage |publisher=American Civil Liberties Union |url=https://www.aclu.org/other/democracy-held-hostage |access-date=2022-12-24}} Two ballot measures were interfered with using this method:

  • Initiative 59, which legalized cannabis for medical use, was blocked via the Barr Amendment, named after Congressman Bob Barr. It even prevented the D.C. government from counting the results of the ballot measure vote for over a year. The amendment remained in effect until Congress voluntarily overturned it in 2009.{{cite press release |author= |title=Congress Lifts Ban on Medical Marijuana for Nation's Capitol |publisher=Americans for Safe Access |date=2009-12-13 |url=https://www.safeaccessnow.org/congress_lifts_ban_on_medical_marijuana_for_nations_capitol |access-date=2022-12-24}}
  • Initiative 71, which legalized cannabis for recreational use, was manipulated with a rider written by Congressman Andy Harris. It blocks the D.C. government from regulating the sale of cannabis, creating an unregulated gift economy. The rider remains in effect {{as of|2022|lc=y|post=.}}{{cite news |last=Flynn |first=Meagan |title=Congress Keeps D.C. Marijuana, Abortion Riders in Budget |date=2022-03-09 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/03/09/dc-marijuana-abortion-congress/ |access-date=2023-01-19 |url-access=limited}}

Initiative 77 was threatened by an amendment written by Congressmen Mark Meadows and Gary Palmer to block it from taking effect.{{cite news |last=Campbell |first=Alexia Fernández |title=House Republicans Try to Block DC from Raising Wages for Restaurant Workers |date=2018-07-12 |work=Vox |url=https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/7/12/17561980/initiative-77-repeal-republicans-congress |access-date=2022-12-05}} The amendment did not appear in the final enacted budget bill;{{cite act |type=Public Law |index=116-37 |date={{date|2019-08-02|mdy}} |legislature=United States Congress |title=H.R.3877 - Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 |url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/3877 |access-date=2022-12-05}} it was instead repealed by the D.C. Council.

List of ballot measures since 1979

class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders"

! scope="col" | Year

! scope="col" | Measure name

! class="unsortable" scope="col" |Description

! scope="col" | Status

! scope="col" | Yes votes

! scope="col" | No votes

! scope="col" class="unsortable" | {{Reference heading}}

rowspan="3" | 1980

! scope="row" |Initiative 2

| An initiative to legalize some forms of gambling, including a lottery, bingo, raffles, and some sports betting{{Cite news |date=1980-05-05 |title=District Divided on Gambling |page=4 |newspaper=Daily Press |location=Newport News, Virginia |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/111870833/district-divided-on-gambling/ |access-date=2022-10-23 |via=Newspapers.com}}

| {{Failure|Failed}}

|14,871 (39.23%)

|23,032 (60.77%)

| {{Cite news |date=1980-05-07 |title=Kennedy's Winner In D.C. Primary |page=6 |newspaper=Daily Press |location=Newport News, Virginia |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/111871063/kennedys-winner-in-dc-primary/ |access-date=2022-10-23 |via=Newspapers.com}}

scope="row" |Initiative 3

|An initiative to begin the process of moving the District of Columbia to statehood{{Cite news |title=D.C. Statehood on Ballot |page=3 |newspaper=The Daily Times |date=1980-10-14 |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/111871357/dc-statehood-on-ballot/ |access-date=2022-12-24 |via=Newspapers.com}}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|90,533 (59.7%)

|60,972 (40.2%)

| {{Cite web |title=Master Initiative and Initiative Measure List |url=https://dcboe.org/getattachment/Ballot-Measures/Initiative-Measures/MASTER-INITIATIVE-AND-INITIATIVE-MEASURE-LIST-wtih-hyperlinks-(2-27-19).pdf.aspx?lang=en-US |access-date=2022-10-23 |website=District of Columbia Board of Elections}}{{Cite web |title=Washington DC Ballot Tallies for 1980 |url=https://archive.org/details/election-results-1980-g |access-date=2023-02-02 |website=Internet Archive}}

scope="row" |Initiative 6

| An initiative to legalize some forms of gambling for charitable purposes

| {{Success |Passed}}

|104,899 (63.6%)

|59,833 (36.3%)

|

1981

! scope="row" |Initiative 7

|An initiative to provide tuition tax credits for public education{{Cite news |last1=Harris |first1=Leslie A. |last2=Herbert |first2=Jule R. |date=1981-10-30 |title=Election Issues: Tuition Tax |pages=A30 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/147149492 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|147149492}} }}

| {{Failure|Failed}}

|8,904 (10.76%)

|73,829 (89.24%)

| {{Cite news |last1=Pianin |first1=Eric |last2=Feinberg |first2=Lawrence |date=1981-11-04 |title=D.C. Voters Reject Tax Credit |pages=A1 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/147324512 |access-date=2022-10-26 |id={{ProQuest|147324512}} }}

rowspan="2" | 1982

! scope="row" |Initiative 9

|An initiative to require a mandatory minimum prison sentence, without the opportunity for parole, for people convicted for some crimes{{Cite news |date=2002-01-31 |title=Referendums and Other Measures Decided by Voters |pages=T04 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/409254201 |access-date=2022-10-25|id={{ProQuest|409254201}} }}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|82,238 (72.25%)

|31,579 (27.75%)

| {{Cite web |date=1982-09-26 |title=September's Primary Election Sept 14, 1982 Summary Report |url=https://archive.org/details/septembers-primary-election-sept-14-1982-summary-report |access-date=2023-02-06 |website=Internet Archive}}

scope="row" |Initiative 10

|An initiative supporting a nuclear freeze between the United States and the USSR{{Cite news |last=Hodge |first=Paul |date=1982-11-03 |title=28 Antinuclear Demonstrators Arrested |pages=B8 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/147462279 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|147462279}} }}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|77,521 (69.91%)

|33,369 (30.09%)

| {{Cite news |last1=Sherwood |first1=Tom |last2=Milloy |first2=Courtland |date=1982-11-03 |title=D.C. Voters Approve Statehood Constitution and Nuclear Freeze |pages=A34 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/147391827 |access-date=2022-10-26 |id={{ProQuest|147391827}} }}

1983

! scope="row" |Initiative 11

| An initiative to require the preservation of the historic Rhodes' Tavern and protect it from development{{Cite news |last=Grano Jr |first=Joseph N. |date=1983-11-03 |title=Rhodes Tavern Should Be Saved |pages=VG2 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/147565513 |access-date=2022-10-25|id={{ProQuest|147565513}} }}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|22,114 (59.68%)

|14,938 (40.32%)

| {{Cite news |last=Pichirallo |first=Joe |date=1983-11-09 |title=D.C. Voters Overwhelmingly Favor Saving Historic Rhodes Tavern |pages=A15 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/147590747 |access-date=2022-10-26 |id={{ProQuest|147590747}} }}

1984

! scope="row" |Initiative 17

| An initiative to guarantee a right to adequate overnight shelter for homeless people

| {{Partial failure|Passed; repealed}}{{Cite journal |last=Wells |first=Katie J. |date=2020 |title=Policy-failing: a repealed right to shelter |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02723638.2019.1598733 |journal=Urban Geography |volume=41 |issue=9 |pages=1139–1157 |doi=10.1080/02723638.2019.1598733 |s2cid=151203891 |via=Taylor & Francis Online}}

|109,080 (72.12%)

|42,159 (27.88%)

| {{Cite news |last=Boodman |first=Sandra G. |date=1984-11-07 |title=Voters Approve Homeless' Right to Shelter |pages=A41 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/138098047 |access-date=2022-10-26 |id={{ProQuest|138098047}} }}

1985

! scope="row" |Referendum 1

| A referendum to maintain rent control provisions for some kinds of housing

| {{Success |Passed}}

|22,920 (50.82%)

|22,183 (49.18%)

| {{Cite news |date=1985-11-16 |title=D.C. Absentee Ballots Tallied |pages=B5 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/pagepdf/138483404/ |access-date=2022-10-26 |via=ProQuest}}

rowspan="2" | 1987

! scope="row" |Initiative 25

|An initiative stating that the funding of public education is a high priority and requiring the government adhere to a schedule of public hearings for public education funding{{Cite news |last1=Boogs |first1=Roderic V. O. |last2=Toyer |first2=Iris |date=1987-09-20 |title=D.C.'s Schoolchildren Are Important |pages=C8 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/139286846 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|139286846}} }}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|54,729 (77.14%)

|16,223 (22.86%)

| {{Citation |title=Washington DC Ballot Tallies for 1987 |publication-date=1987 |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections}}

scope="row" |Initiative 28

|An initiative to require beverage retailers provide a five-cent refund for all cans and bottles returned

| {{Failure|Failed}}

|42,574 (55.00%)

|34,834 (45.00%)

| {{Cite news |last=Bruske |first=Ed |date=1987-11-04 |title=Bottle Bill Is Rejected In District: 5 of 6 Incumbents Win Reelection To School Board |pages=A1 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/139257367 |access-date=2022-10-26 |id={{ProQuest|139257367}} }}

1990

! scope="row" |Referendum 5

|A referendum to guarantee a right to adequate overnight shelter for homeless people{{Cite news |last=Gellman |first=Barton |date=1990-10-13 |title=D.C. Ordered To Provide Better Shelter; Families Must Be Moved Out of Hotels |pages=B01 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/307328228 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|307328228}} }}

| {{Failure|Failed}}

|60,734 (48.72%)

|63,913 (51.28%)

| {{Cite news |last=Wheeler |first=Linda |date=1990-11-15 |title=005 Felled By Voters In Ward 3; Homeless Issue Won In Most of District |pages=J08 |newspaper=The Washington post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/307375969 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|307375969}} }}

rowspan="2" | 1991

! scope="row" |Initiative 31

|An initiative to ban horse-drawn carriages from operating on public streets{{Cite news |last=Sanchez |first=Rene |date=1991-11-06 |title=Voters Pass Law Making Assault-Gun Merchants Liable |pages=A27 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/140574474 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|140574474}} }}

| {{Failure|Failed}}

|19,429 (38.00%)

|31,403 (62.00%)

| {{Cite news |date=1991-11-07 |title=THE 1991 ELECTIONS; THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |pages=D06 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/307449542 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|307449542}} }}

scope="row" |Referendum 6

|A referendum to hold gun manufacturers liable when use of their weapons results in pain, death, or medical expenses

| {{Success |Passed}}

|40,196 (77.00%)

|11,692 (23.00%)

|

rowspan="2" | 1992

! scope="row" |Initiative 41

|An initiative to limit individual contributions for local elections{{Cite news |last=Nathanson |first=Jim |date=1992-10-18 |title=Initiative 41: Bonanza for Incumbents |pages=C6 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/140700011 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|140700011}} }}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|122,502 (64.70%)

|66,843 (35.30%)

|

scope="row" |Initiative 43

|An initiative to authorize the death penalty for local inmates convicted of first-degree murder

| {{Failure|Failed}}

|66,303 (32.86%)

|135,465 (67.14%)

| {{Cite web |date=1992-11-13 |title=District of Columbia General Election - November 3, 1992 - Final and Complete Election Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://dcboe.org/dcboe/media/PDFFiles/1992_Nov_results.pdf |access-date=2022-10-24}}

1993

! scope="row" |Initiative 37

|An initiative calling for the United States and former members of the USSR to denuclearize and direct funding towards human services{{Cite news |date=1993-09-14 |title=Vote NO on Initiative 37 |pages=A20 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/140740670 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|140740670}} }}{{Cite news |date=1993-10-06 |title=More on Initiative 37 |pages=A18 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/307696507 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|307696507}} }}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|41,702 (56.26%)

|32,422 (43.74%)

| {{Cite web |date=1993-09-24 |title=District of Columbia Special Election - September 14, 1993 - Final and Complete Election Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://dcboe.org/dcboe/media/PDFFiles/1993_spec_elec_results.pdf |access-date=2022-10-24}}

1994

! scope="row" |Initiative 49

|An initiative limiting the mayor, councilmembers, and school board members to two consecutive terms{{Cite news |last=Brown |first=DeNeen L. |date=1994-11-09 |title=THE DISTRICT; Voters Back Term Limits By Big Margin; Approval of Initiative 49 Crosses Racial Lines |pages=A29 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/307776152 |access-date=2022-10-25|id={{ProQuest|307776152}} }}

| {{Partial failure|Passed; repealed}}

|83,865 (62.00%)

|52,116 (38.00%)

| {{Cite web |date=1994-11-18 |title=November 8 General Election |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://dcboe.org/Elections/Election-Results-Archives/Election-Year-1994/November-8-General-Election |access-date=2022-10-24}}

1996

! scope="row" | Initiative 51

|An initiative to allow residents to challenge commercial property assessments{{Cite news |date=1996-11-04 |title=Initiative 51 -- No |pages=A18 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/307994648 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|307994648}} }}

| {{Failure|Failed}}

|110,523 (80.00%)

|27,982 (20.00%)

| {{Cite web |date=1996-11-15 |title=November 15 General Election |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://dcboe.org/Elections/Election-Results-Archives/Election-Year-1996/November-5-General-Election |access-date=2022-10-24}}

1998

! scope="row" | Initiative 59

|An initiative to legalize the possession, cultivation, and distribution of cannabis for medical reasons{{Cite news |date=1998-10-24 |title=Initiative 59: Snuffed Out |pages=A24 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/1620796040 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|1620796040}} }}

| {{Partial failure|Passed; temporarily blocked}}{{Efn|Initiative was rendered invalid by Congress before ballots were cast.{{Cite news |date=1998-10-24 |title=Initiative 59: Snuffed out |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1998/10/24/initiative-59-snuffed-out/d92b42a2-47f6-4286-a295-9b7946667628/ |access-date=2022-10-26}} A congressional rider blocked implementation of this measure until 2009.{{cite news |last1=Altieri |first1=Erik |title=First Medical Marijuana Sale Reported in Washington, DC |url=http://blog.norml.org/2013/07/30/first-medical-marijuana-sale-reported-in-washington-dc/ |access-date=2017-06-02|work=NORML |date=2013-07-30}}}}

|75,536 (69.00%)

|34,621 (31.00%)

| {{Cite web |date=1999-09-20 |title=November 3, 1998 General Election Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://dcboe.org/dcboe/media/ArchivedElectionResults/ini59_98.htm |access-date=2022-10-24}}

2000

! scope="row" |Charter Amendment 3

|A charter amendment reducing the size of the State Board of Education from eleven members to nine members

| {{Success |Passed}}

|20,511 (51.00%)

|19,668 (49.00%)

| {{Cite web |date=2000-07-07 |title=June 27 Special Election on Charter Amendment III |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://www.dcboe.org/Elections/Election-Results-Archives/Election-Year-2000/June-27-Special-Election-on-Charter-Amendment-III |access-date=2022-10-25}}

2002

! scope="row" |Initiative 62

|An initiative to allow some nonviolent drug offenders to go through a treatment program rather than drug courts{{Cite news |last1=Santana |first1=Arthur |last2=Tucker |first2=Neely |date=2002-10-31 |title=Drug Treatment, Prosecutor Measures Go Before Voters |pages=DE3-4 |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/2075213477 |access-date=2022-10-25 |id={{ProQuest|2075213477}} }}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|86,162 (78.17%)

|24,063 (21.83%)

| {{Cite web |date=2002-11-21 |title=Certification Results General Election - November 5, 2002 |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://dcboe.org/dcboe/media/ArchivedElectionResults/initiative.html |access-date=2022-10-24}}

2010

! scope="row" |Proposed Charter Amendment IV

|A referendum to make the D.C. attorney general position an elected office{{Cite news |last=Marchese |first=Darci |date=2010-06-01 |title=Referendum Would Allow D.C. to Vote for AG |work=WTOP-FM |url=https://wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=1970459 |access-date=2022-10-24 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2013-05-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130522035028/https://wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=1970459}}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|90,316 (75.78%)

|28,868 (24.22%)

| {{Cite web |date=2010-11-19 |title=General Election 2010 - Certified Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://electionresults.dcboe.org/election_results/2010-General-Election |access-date=2022-11-29}}

2012

!Charter Amendment V

|Council may, by a 5/6 vote, expel a Councilmember.

|Passed

|22,452

(85.94%)

|36,883

(14.06%)

|

2012

!Charter Amendment VI

|Makes ineligible to serve any Councilmember convicted of a felony while in office

|Passed

|204,986

(77.61%)

|59,144

(22.39%)

|

2012

!Charter Amendment VII

|Makes ineligible to serve any Mayor convicted of a felony while in office

|Passed

|206,813

(78.35%)

|57,132

(21.65%)

|

2013

! scope="row" |Proposed Charter Amendment VIII

|A referendum to grant Washington, D.C., budget autonomy from the United States federal budget{{Cite web |last=Howell Jr. |first=Tom |date=2013-01-08 |title=D.C. elections board approves budget autonomy referendum |url=https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/8/dc-elections-board-approves-budget-autonomy-refere/ |access-date=2022-10-24 |website=The Washington Times}}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|46,788 (86.33%)

|7,411 (13.67%)

| {{Cite web |date=2013-05-10 |title=Special Election 2013 - Certified Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://electionresults.dcboe.org/election_results/2013-Special-Election |access-date=2022-11-29}}

2014

! scope="row" |Initiative 71

|An initiative to legalize the possession and cultivation of cannabis for personal use in small amounts{{Cite news |last1=Davis |first1=Aaron C. |last2=Craighill |first2=Peyton M. |date=2014-09-18 |title=Poll: D.C. voters poised to legalize pot, elevating national debate over marijuana |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/poll-dc-voters-poised-to-legalize-pot-elevating-national-debate-over-marijuana/2014/09/18/08360f90-3dfe-11e4-b0ea-8141703bbf6f_story.html |access-date=2022-10-24 |newspaper=The Washington Post}}

| {{Partial failure|Passed; partially blocked}}

|115,050 (70.06%)

|49,168 (29.94%)

| {{Cite web |date=2014-12-03 |title=General Election 2014 - Certified Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://electionresults.dcboe.org/election_results/2014-General-Election |access-date=2022-10-24}}

2016

! scope="row" |Advisory Referendum B

|A referendum approving a state constitution and encouraging the D.C. Council to petition Congress to admit the District of Columbia as the 51st state{{Cite web |date=2016-11-09 |title=DC Voters Elect Gray to Council, Approve Statehood Measure |url=https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/dc-election-statehood-council-seats/96080/ |access-date=2022-10-25 |website=NBC4 Washington}}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|244,134 (78.48%)

|40,779 (13.11%)

| {{Cite web |date=2016-11-18 |title=General Election 2016 - Certified Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://electionresults.dcboe.org/election_results/2016-General-Election |access-date=2022-10-25 |url-status=live |archive-date=2018-02-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180209232929/https://www.dcboe.org/election_info/election_results/v3/2016/November-8-General-Election}}

2018

! scope="row" |Initiative 77

|An initiative to increase the minimum wage for tipped employees to the same level as non-tipped employees{{Cite news |last=Nirappil |first=Fenit |date=2018-03-07 |title=D.C. voters to decide in June if tipped workers should get same minimum wage |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-voters-to-decide-in-june-if-tipped-workers-should-get-same-minimum-wage/2018/03/07/f40a9ecc-222f-11e8-94da-ebf9d112159c_story.html |access-date=2022-10-24 |newspaper=The Washington Post}}

| {{Partial failure|Passed; repealed}}{{Cite web |last=King |first=Kristi |date=2018-10-16 |title=DC Council officially overturns Initiative 77, killing minimum-wage increase |url=https://wtop.com/dc/2018/10/dc-council-officially-overturns-initiative-77-killing-minimum-wage-increase/ |access-date=2022-10-24 |website=WTOP News}}

|47,230 (55.74%)

|37,504 (44.26%)

| {{Cite web |date=2018-07-09 |title=Primary Election 2018 - Certified Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://electionresults.dcboe.org/election_results/2018-Primary-Election |access-date=2022-10-24}}

2020

! scope="row" |Initiative 81

|An initiative to require police to treat entheogenic plants and fungi as a lowest-priority offense, a form of effective decriminalization{{cite news |author1-last=Hall |author1-first=Madison |author2-last=Price |author2-first=Rob |title=Live Results: Washington, DC Votes to Decriminalize Psychedelic Plants and Mushrooms |work=Business Insider |date=2020-11-03 |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/washington-dc-initiative-81-to-decriminalize-shrooms-live-results-2020-10 |access-date=2022-12-24}}

| {{Success |Passed}}

|214,685 (76.18%)

|67,140 (23.82%)

| {{Cite web |date=2020-12-02 |title=General Election 2020 - Certified Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://electionresults.dcboe.org/election_results/2020-General-Election |access-date=2022-11-29}}

2022

! scope="row" |Initiative 82

|An initiative to increase the minimum wage for tipped employees to the same level as non-tipped employees{{Cite web |last=Hopkins |first=Paige |date=2022-10-25 |title=Here's what Initiative 82 could mean for tipping in D.C. |url=https://www.axios.com/local/washington-dc/2022/10/25/initiative-82-tipping-dc |access-date=2022-10-27 |website=Axios}}

| {{Success|Passed}}

| 132,925 (73.94%)

| 46,861 (26.06%)

| {{Cite web |date=2022-11-30 |title=General Election 2022 - Certified Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections |url=https://electionresults.dcboe.org/election_results/2022-General-Election |access-date=2022-12-03}}

2024

! scope="row" |Initiative 83

| An initiative that would permit ranked-choice voting and open the primary elections to independent voters.{{cite web |title=Washington, D.C., Initiative 83, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (November 2024) |website=Ballotpedia |url=https://ballotpedia.org/Washington,_D.C.,_Initiative_83,_Ranked-Choice_Voting_Initiative_(November_2024) |access-date=2024-09-10}}

| {{Success|Passed}}

| 212,332 (72.89%)

| 78,961 (27.11%)

| {{Cite web |date=2024-12-11 |title=General Election 20224 - Certified Results |publisher=District of Columbia Board of Elections

| url=https://electionresults.dcboe.org/election_results/2024-General-Election |access-date=2024-12-11}}

Notes

{{Notelist}}

References

{{Reflist}}