Martin Durkin (director)#Against Nature

In 1997, Channel 4 broadcast Durkin's documentary series Against Nature, which attacked the environmental movement as being a threat to personal freedom and for crippling economic development.

The UK's then broadcasting regulator the Independent Television Commission received 151 complaints from viewers and interviewees featured in the programme with four complaints upheld.[http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/itc/itc_publications/complaints_reports/programme_complaints/show_complaint.asp-prog_complaint_id=40.html Programme Complaints & Interventions Report], ofcom.org.uk; accessed 20 December 2015.[https://www.theguardian.com/Columnists/Column/0,,184160,00.html Getting your science from charlatans] George Monbiot, The Guardian, 16 March 2000. In its report on the series, the ITC rejected 147 complaints that mainly were concerned with fairness and misrepresentation, stating that "the programmes' line that green ideologies were, at least in some respects, open to criticism on both scientific and humanitarian grounds, was a legitimate approach". It stated that environmentalists had been permitted a fair chance to air their side of the story in the televised debates that followed the broadcast.{{citation needed|date=December 2015}}

The ITC stated that four complaints were upheld because: "the programmes breached the Programme Code in respect of the failure to make the four interviewees adequately aware of the nature of the programmes, and the way their contributions were edited."[http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/itc/itc_publications/complaints_reports/programme_complaints/show_complaint.asp-prog_complaint_id=40.html Independent Television Commission ruling on "Against Nature"], ofcom.org.uk; accessed 20 December 2015. For these reasons, Channel 4 later issued a public apology on prime time television.{{cite web|title=Why would Channel 4 attempt to discredit the environmental movement?|url=http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/climate/why-would-channel-4-attempt-discredit-environmental-movement|publisher=Greenpeace UK|accessdate=2014-07-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714174200/http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/climate/why-would-channel-4-attempt-discredit-environmental-movement|archive-date=2014-07-14|url-status=dead}} According to The Independent, Durkin "accepts the charge of misleading contributors, but describes the verdict of distortion as 'complete tosh'".

{{BLP one source|section|date=December 2015}}

Durkin produced two documentaries for Channel 4's science strand Equinox. In 1998 he produced "Storm in a D-Cup", which argued that the medical dangers of silicone breast implants had been exaggerated for political reasons and highlighting evidence that implants may even carry medical benefits. In 2000 he produced The Rise and Fall of GM defending the science of genetic modification.

The 1998 documentary on breast implants was originally developed for the BBC but was eventually produced for Channel 4 after the BBC declined to commission it; the BBC's in-house researcher concluded that Durkin had ignored evidence contradicting his claims in the programme. Environmental activist and writer George Monbiot wrote "Neither Martin Durkin nor, extraordinarily, Charles Furneaux, the commissioning editor of the science series Equinox, has a science background. They don't need one, for science on Channel 4 has been reduced to a crude manifesto for corporate libertarianism." The film later won awards from the British Medical Association and the American Society for Plastic Surgeons.{{citation needed|date=March 2024}}

This documentary, which argues in favour of genetic modification, was broadcast on Channel 4 on 20 March 2000, also met with complaints.

[http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=39 Profile of Durkin] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070318034944/http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=39 |date=2007-03-18 }}, gmwatch.org; accessed 20 December 2015. Environmentalist activists organised a campaign in an effort to discredit the film. A joint letter signed by a number of scientists from the Third World was issued in protest of Durkin's claims in this documentary.[http://www.biotech-info.net/joint_letter.html Joint letter to Channel Four Television and the Times newspaper] Tewolde Gebre Egziaber Mae-Wan Ho, a scientist featured on the programme, later said of her participation in the programme: "I feel completely betrayed and misled. They did not tell me it was going to be an attack on my position." However, although broadcasting regulator Ofcom received 17 complaints about the programme none was upheld; Ofcom concluded that 'although the programme set out to be a critical analysis of the case against GM, it nevertheless gave opportunity for a number of anti-GM speakers to explain their views clearly and fairly.'[http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/itc/itc_publications/complaints_reports/programme_complaints/show_complaint.asp-prog_complaint_id=304.html Ofcom review of complaints against Martin Durkin], ofcom.org.uk; accessed 20 December 2015.

{{Main|The Great Global Warming Swindle}}

The Great Global Warming Swindle was a 2007 documentary film promoting climate change denial that premiered on Channel 4 in the United Kingdom on March 8, 2007, and was subsequently criticised heavily by scientists. The film features scientists and others who oppose the scientific consensus that global warming is caused by human activity. The second part of the programme examines the conditions under which one of the current theories was developed. It alleges political pressures on those who do reject anthropogenic causes of global warming, speculates on reasons for the wide adoption of this consensus and on factors leading to its original development. The film also interviews deniers who view environmental policies as holding back developing nations from industrialising.

The film has drawn widespread complaints {{cite news | title=The global-warmers were bound to attack, but why are they so feeble?|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/18/ngreen218.xml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070322110156/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/18/ngreen218.xml|url-status=dead|archive-date=22 March 2007|date=17 March 2007|publisher=Telegraph.co.uk|first=Martin|last=Durkin|accessdate=13 January 2008|location=London, UK}}{{cite news|title=Why Channel 4 has got it wrong over climate change|url=http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2026091,00.html|date=4 March 2007|work=The Guardian|first=Robin|last=McKie|accessdate=13 January 2008|location=London, UK}} from some in the scientific community, citing numerous errors and misleading claims.

Carl Wunsch who appeared on the programme has since repudiated the film, and described it "as close to propaganda as anything since World War II".{{cite news|title=Climate scientist 'duped to deny global warming'|url=http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2031455,00.html|date=11 March 2007|newspaper=The Guardian|first=Ben|last=Goldacre|author2=David Adam|accessdate=13 January 2008|location=London, UK}} Durkin responded that Wunsch had been told very explicitly the nature of the programme and now appeared to be back-tracking.

The film was praised by opponents of the scientific consensus on global warming, including Andrew Bolt,{{cite web|title=The global warming film you mustn't watch|url=http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/the_global_warming_documentary|publisher=The Herald Sun|date=12 March 2007}} Dominic Lawson{{cite news|last=Lawson |first=Dominic |title=Dominic Lawson: Here is another inconvenient truth (but this one will infuriate the Green lobby) |work=The Independent |date=2 March 2007 |url=http://comment.independent.co.uk/columnists_a_l/dominic_lawson/article2318675.ece |accessdate=20 December 2015 |location=London, UK |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080516214557/http://comment.independent.co.uk/columnists_a_l/dominic_lawson/article2318675.ece |archivedate=16 May 2008 }} and Steven Milloy,{{cite web|last=Milloy|first=Steven|title=Must-See Global Warming TV|publisher=Fox News|date=18 March 2007|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258993,00.html|accessdate=18 March 2007}} and Durkin's work has been defended in an interview in Spiked.{{cite web|title=Apocalypse my arse|first=Brendan|last=O'Neill|accessdate=16 March 2007|date=9 March 2007|url=http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2948}}

It later emerged that Durkin had fallen out with geneticist Armand Leroi (with whom Durkin had previously refused to work), after Leroi questioned the accuracy of the data used in the film in an email to Durkin. Leroi copied the e-mail to various colleagues including Guardian journalist and Bad Science columnist Ben Goldacre and science writer and mathematics expert Simon Singh.{{citation needed|date=December 2015}} Durkin replied to Leroi copying in the others with the single sentence: "You're a big daft cock." Singh then sent an email to Durkin that said: "I have not paid the same attention to your programme as Armand has done, but from what I did see it is an irresponsible piece of film-making. If you can send me a copy of the programme then I will examine it in more detail and give you a more considered response...it would be great if you could engage in the debate rather just resorting to one line replies."{{citation needed|date=December 2015}}

Durkin responded by claiming that global warming had stopped, and concluded with, "Never mind a bit of irresponsible film-making. Go and fuck yourself."[http://ocean.mit.edu/~cwunsch/papersonline/durkinemails.htm Email correspondence between Armand Leroi, Simon Singh and Martin Durkin], ocean.mit.edu; accessed 20 December 2015. Durkin later apologised for his language, saying that he had sent the e-mails when tired and had just finished making the programme, and that he was "eager to have all the science properly debated with scientists qualified in the right areas."{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article1517515.ece|title=C4's debate on global warming boils over|accessdate=13 January 2008|date=15 March 2007|publisher=Times Online|first=Sam|last=Coates|author2=Mark Henderson|location=London, UK}}{{dead link|date=September 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}

The film was awarded the Best Documentary trophy at the Io Isabella film festival{{cite web|url=https://bsa.govt.nz/decisions/2794|title=Kodikara and Smith and SKY Network Television Ltd – 2008-077|publisher=Broadcasting Standards Authority|date=25 November 2008|accessdate=26 May 2015}} and was shortlisted for the Best Documentary prize in the British television industry's 2008 Broadcast Awards. An official judgement{{Cite web |url=http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/obb114/issue114.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100215200621/http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/obb114/issue114.pdf |title=Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin |archive-date=February 15, 2010 |date=21 July 2008}} issued on 21 July 2008 by the British media regulator Ofcom found that the programme "did not fulfill obligations to be impartial and to reflect a range of views on controversial issues". It upheld complaints by Sir David King that his views had been misrepresented, and Carl Wunsch, on the points that he had been misled as to its intent, and that the impression had been given that he agreed with the programme's position on climate change. However, the regulator said that because "the link between human activity and global warming... became settled before March 2007" the audience was not "materially misled so as to cause harm or offence". Ofcom declined to rule on the accuracy of the programme, saying: "It is not within Ofcom's remit or ability in this case as the regulator of the 'communications industry' to establish or seek to adjudicate on 'facts' such as whether global warming is a man-made phenomenon".[http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2008/07/21/distortions-falsehoods-fabrications Ofcom comments regarding Durkin], monbiot.com, 21 July 2008.

The movie has also been criticized for presenting only one Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, Hoyt and Schatten (1993),{{cite journal |last1=Hoyt |first1=Douglas V. |last2=Schatten |first2=Kenneth H. |title=A discussion of plausible solar irradiance variations, 1700-1992 |journal=Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |date=November 1993 |volume=98 |issue=A11 |pages=18895–18906 |doi=10.1029/93JA01944|bibcode=1993JGR....9818895H }} which has been unequivocally discredited due to flawed analysis.{{cite journal |last1=Chatzistergos |first1=Theodosios |title=A Discussion of Implausible Total Solar Irradiance Variations Since 1700 |journal=Solar Physics |date=February 2024 |volume=299 |issue=2 |page=21 |doi=10.1007/s11207-024-02262-6|doi-access=free |bibcode=2024SoPh..299...21C }} The apparent agreement between the HS93 TSI reconstruction and Earth's temperature record is now recognized as an artifact of flawed methodology. Consequently, the movie's claim that solar variability can explain the recent increase in global temperatures is invalid.

{{BLP unreferenced section|date=December 2015}}

In 2010 Durkin made a programme called Britain's Trillion Pound Horror Story for Channel 4. Ostensibly about Britain's national debt, the film makes a case for lower taxes, a smaller public sector and a free-market economy.[https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2010/nov/12/britains-trillion-pound-horror-story-tv-review Last night's TV: Britain's Trillion Pound Horror Story and Misfits], The Guardian, 12 November 2010 The film argues that Hong Kong's social and economic success is attributable to the positive non-interventionism implemented in 1961 by John James Cowperthwaite.[http://www.spectator.co.uk/2010/11/rallying-cry/ Rallying cry], James Delingpole, The Spectator, 13 November 2010 In the film, Durkin argued that increasing public spending would stunt the economy instead of reviving it. The film featured Nigel Lawson, Geoffrey Howe, Brendan Barber and Alistair Darling.{{citation needed|date=December 2015}}

{{Main|Brexit: The Movie}}

In 2016 Durkin made a documentary film called Brexit: The Movie, about that year's referendum on EU membership, arguing for a vote to Leave. The film had a budget of £100,000, funded by crowdfunding.{{cite web|url=http://www.cityam.com/235494/eu-referendum-filmmaker-martin-durkin-says-brexit-the-movie-crowdfunding-campaign-has-hit-its-100000-target-ahead-of-its-may-release-date|title=Brexit: The Movie crowdfunding campaign hits its target|first=Emma |last=Haslett|date=26 February 2016|publisher=}}

In 2024, Martin Durkin wrote and directed a documentary film called Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth), promoting climate change denial, by downplaying the extent of the problem and the dangers posed by the current rate of anthropogenic climate change, whilst promoting discredited theories (such as solar activity and cosmic rays being the cause of rising temperatures), promoting misinformation about the impacts of climate change on things such as the Great Barrier Reef and polar bears, promoting conspiracy theories (by framing the issue as one of 'climate vs freedom'), and actively discouraging the adoption of climate change mitigation measures.{{Cite web |title=Climate – the Movie: a hot mess of (c)old myths! |url=https://skepticalscience.com/climate-the-movie-a-hot-mess-of-cold-myths.html |access-date=2024-03-31 |website=Skeptical Science|date=23 March 2024|last1=Mason|first1=John|last2=Winkler|first2=Bärbel|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240331171753/https://skepticalscience.com/climate-the-movie-a-hot-mess-of-cold-myths.html|url-status=live|archive-date=2024-03-31}}{{Cite web |date=2024-04-11 |title=Review of Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) reveals numerous, well-known misinformation talking points and inaccuracies – Science Feedback |url=https://science.feedback.org/review/review-climate-the-movie-the-cold-truth-reveals-numerous-well-known-misinformation-talking-points-inaccuracies/ |access-date=2024-05-27 |website=science.feedback.org/ |language=en-GB}}

The movie, like The Great Global Warming Swindle, has also been criticized{{cite web |last1=Chatzistergos |first1=Dr. Theodosios |title=E-SWAN Chizhevsky Medal Lecture 2024 by Dr. Theodosios Chatzistergos |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2H_i5CmtFlA&t=1090s&ab_channel=E-SWAN |website=Youtube |access-date=5 May 2025}} for presenting only the Hoyt and Schatten (1993) TSI series, which has been unequivocally discredited due to flawed analysis. Its apparent agreement with Earth's temperature record is now understood to be an artifact of that flawed methodology and the whole claim of the movie that TSI can explain the temperature increase on Earth over the recent decades is invalid.

Martin Durkin has executive produced a wide range of programmes. Productions include: The Naked Pilgrim, an architectural travelogue that followed art critic Brian Sewell's pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela; produced for UK's Channel Five it won the Sandford St. Martin Trust award for best programme in 2004; Face of Britain for Channel 4, a three-part series presented by Neil Oliver, which looked at the Wellcome Trust's DNA project profiling the ancestry of various British communities; How Do They Do It?, an engineering series for Discovery Channel; Secret Intersex, a two-part series about intersexuality for Channel 4, which was short listed for Best Science Programme in the 2004 Royal Television Society awards.[http://www.rts.org.uk/awards.asp?sec_id=725 Royal Television Society – Programme] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060925011331/http://www.rts.org.uk/awards.asp?sec_id=725 |date=2006-09-25 }}, rts.org.uk; accessed 20 December 2015. He has served on the steering committees of the World Congress of Science Producers and the Edinburgh Television Festival and as a judge on the Bafta and Royal Television Society Awards.{{citation needed|date=March 2024}}

{{reflist|30em}}

• {{IMDb name|1942836}}
• Geoffrey Lean, [https://web.archive.org/web/20070315010705/http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/climate_change/article2326210.ece "Global Warming: An inconvenient truth or hot air?"], The Independent, 4 March 2007.
• [http://www.channel4.com/programmes/britains-trillion-pound-horror-story/episode-guide/series-1/episode-1 Britain's Trillion Pound Horror Story] · [http://www.channel4.com/programmes/britains-trillion-pound-horror-story/4od#3139408 Watch on 4OD] · [http://www.channel4.com/programmes/britains-trillion-pound-horror-story/4od/player/3139408 Play on 4OD Player]
• Robin McKie,[http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2026125,00.html "Why Channel 4 has got it wrong over climate change"], The Observer, 4 March 2007.
• Profile of Martin Durkin on GMWatch.org [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318034944/http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=39 Profile of Martin Durkin], GMWatch.org; accessed 20 December 2015.
• [https://www.theguardian.com/Archive/Article/0,4273,3976877,00.html "More digs at Durkin"], The Guardian, 22 March 2000.
• [http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/19980402000124.html Friends of the Earth press release], foe.co.uk, 2 April 1998.
• [http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/itc/itc_publications/complaints_reports/programme_complaints/show_complaint.asp-prog_complaint_id=40.html Independent Television Commission ruling on "Against Nature"], ofcom.org.uk; accessed 20 December 2015.
• [https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/jul/21/climatechange.carbonemissions1 "Why does Channel 4 seem to be waging a war against the greens?"] The Guardian, 22 July 2008.
• [http://www.brexitthemovie.com Brexit – The Movie web site]
• [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3Tfxiuo-oM Climate The Movie on Youtube]

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Durkin, Martin}}

Category:Living people

Category:British documentary film directors

Category:English television producers

Category:Equinox (TV series)

Category:1962 births

Category:British conspiracy theorists