Nada (1974 film)

{{Infobox film

| name = Nada

| image = Nada French Poster.jpg

| alt =

| caption = French theatrical release poster

| director = Claude Chabrol

| screenplay = Claude Chabrol

| based_on = {{Based on|Nada|Jean-Patrick Manchette}}

| producer = André Génovès

| starring = {{ubl|Fabio Testi|Maurice Garrel|Mariangela Melato|Michel Duchaussoy}}

| cinematography = Jean Rabier

| editing = Jacques Gaillard

| music = Pierre Jansen

| studio = {{ubl|Les Films La Boëtie|Italian International Film}}

| distributor = {{ubl|Les Films La Boëtie (France)|Cinema International Corporation (Italy)}}

| released = {{Film date|df=y|1974|||France|ref1=}}

| runtime = 110 minutes

| country = {{ubl|France|Italy}}

| language = {{ubl|French|English}}

}}

Nada ({{langx|es|Nothing}}), also titled The Nada Gang in the US,{{cite news|first=Nora |last=Sayre |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1974/11/07/archives/screen-chabrols-the-nada-gang-is-at-playboythe-cast.html |title=Screen: Chabrol's 'The Nada Gang' Is at Playboy |work=The New York Times |date=7 November 1974 |access-date=11 May 2023}}{{cite news|first=Andrew |last=Sarris |url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=dv5NAAAAIBAJ&sjid=2osDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6058,3747013&hl=en |title=Fear & loathing of the bourgeoisie |work=The Village Voice |date=14 November 1974 |access-date=11 May 2023}} is a 1974 Franco-Italian political thriller film directed by Claude Chabrol, based on the novel of the same name by Jean-Patrick Manchette.{{cite web|url=http://cinema.encyclopedie.films.bifi.fr/index.php?pk=47460 |title=Nada (1973) Claude Chabrol |website=Ciné-Ressources |access-date=11 May 2023 |language=fr}} It follows an anarchist group which, after kidnapping the United States Ambassador to France, is hunted down by the police, with both sides making use of uninhibited violence.

Plot

The anarchist group "Nada" decides to kidnap the United States Ambassador to France and demand a ransom for his release. Although some group members are reluctant to the plan, teacher Treuffais alone refuses to participate in the venture. During the operation, carried out in a brothel which the Ambassador regularly visits, a police officer and an undercover agent are killed. The Minister of the Interior orders Commissioner Goémond to find the hideout of the group, implying that the death of the hostage could be useful to the state as it would turn the public's opinion against the Left. During the attack on the group's refuge, all members except Diaz are killed, who executes his hostage before he flees. Goémond, who had arrested and violently interrogated Treuffais, waits for Diaz in Treuffais' apartment, convinced that Diaz will show up sooner or later. During the final shootout, both Goémond and Diaz are killed. Treuffais rings up a newspaper, offering to tell the full story of the Nada group.

Cast

;The Nada group

Fabio Testi as Diaz
Maurice Garrel as Épaulard
Mariangela Melato as Cash
Michel Duchaussoy as Treuffais
Lou Castel as D'Arey

;Others

Michel Aumont as Goémond
Didier Kaminka as Meyer
Katia Romanoff as Anna Meyer
André Falcon as the Minister
Lyle Joyce as Ambassador Poindexter
Viviane Romance as Mrs. Gabrielle
Daniel Lecourtois as the Prefect
Rudy Lenoir as Mr. Bouillon
Dominique Zardi as policeman
Henri Attal as policeman
François Perrot

Reception and legacy

The initial reaction of French critics towards Nada was reserved.{{cite book|title=Current Biography Yearbook 1976 |publisher=H. W. Wilson Company |year=1976 |page=70}} While Jacques Grant of magazine Cinématographe called it a "poor film", Chabrol's former colleagues of Cahiers du Cinéma simply ignored it (as they had already done with Chabrol's three preceding works).{{cite book|title=Tout Chabrol |first=Laurent |last=Bourdon |publisher=LettMotif |year=2020 |isbn= 9782367163093 |pages=243–44}} Louis Chauvet of Le Figaro considered the scenario weak, but saw a maturation of the director's talent in purely cinematographic terms.

Upon the film's opening in New York on 6 November 1974, The New York Times critic Nora Sayre titled Nada a "muddled yet sometimes rewarding movie" with "impeccable camerawork" and "several good performances", but one that "grasps at clichés" in its portrayal of the Nada group, concluding that Chabrol "has chosen a milieu that's just too alien for him, as the absurdity of the film's conclusion proves". Writing for The Village Voice, Andrew Sarris was even less sympathetic of the film, in which "stylistics prevail over thematics". Although rating it superior to Costa-Gavras' two years earlier State of Siege, Sarris called Nada a "spectacle of joyless unimaginative smugness", being "relentlessly rhethorical" and counselling "a revolutionary patience of Christian duration" when it argues that "terrorism is counterproductive in terms of the desirable end of a revolution".

Contrary to Sayre's and Sarris' opinion, Tom Milne in British magazine Time Out regarded Nada as "one of Chabrol's best films" and a "chillingly cool political thriller", which juxtaposes the "absurd ideological confusions" of the Nada group with an authority which is "even less concerned with human life than the terrorists".{{cite book|title=Time Out Film Guide, Seventh Edition 1999 |publisher=Penguin |location=London |year=1998}}

In her 1999 book May 68 in French Fiction and Film: Rethinking Society, Rethinking Representation, Margaret Atack sees Nada as Chabrol's exploration of the "weakness of the bourgeoisie"{{cite book|last=Atack |first=Margaret |title=May 68 in French Fiction and Film: Rethinking Society, Rethinking Representation |year=1999 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780198715153 |page=129}}{{cite book|first=Susan |last=Hayward |title=French National Cinema |publisher=Routledge |location=London |year=1993 |page=260}} through the suspense format of the social thriller,{{cite book|editor1-last=Cook |editor1-first=Malcolm |editor2-last=Cook |editor2-first=Martin |title=French Culture Since 1945 |year=1993 |publisher=Longman |location=London |isbn=9780582088061 |page=86}} which overlaps with film noir in Chabrol's obsession with the "very fine line between good and evil, morality and madness".