Nagato-class battleship#Footnotes

The IJN considered a battle fleet of eight modern battleships and eight modern armored cruisers necessary for the defense of Japan, and the government adopted that policy in 1907.Evans & Peattie, p. 150 This was the genesis of the Eight-Eight Fleet Program, the development of a cohesive battle line of 16 capital ships less than eight years old.Stille, p. 7 Advances in naval technology like the British battleship {{HMS|Dreadnought|1906|6}} and the battlecruiser {{HMS|Invincible|1907|6}} forced the IJN to several times re-evaluate the ships that it counted as modern. By 1910, the IJN considered none of its current ships to be modern and restarted the program in 1911 with orders for the {{sclass|Fusō|battleship|0}} dreadnoughts and the {{sclass|Kongō|battlecruiser|2}}s. By 1915, the IJN was halfway to its goal and wanted to order four more dreadnoughts, but the Diet rejected its plan, and the 1916 budget authorized only one dreadnought, later named {{ship|Japanese battleship|Nagato||2}}, and two battlecruisers. Later that year, American President Woodrow Wilson announced plans for 10 additional battleships and six battlecruisers, and the following year the Diet authorized three more dreadnoughts in response, one of which would later be named {{ship|Japanese battleship|Mutsu||2}}.Evans & Peattie, pp. 160, 166–167

File:ONI-Nagato-class.jpg recognition drawing of the Nagato class]]

Allocated project number A-102, the Nagato class was designed before Commander Yuzuru Hiraga was reassigned to the Navy Technical Department (NTD) responsible for ship design, although Hiraga is often credited with the design of these ships.{{#tag:ref|Nagato was ordered on 12 May 1916 and Hiraga returned to the NTD three days later.Lengerer, footnote 3|group=Note}} In contrast to earlier designs, the Nagato class used the American "all or nothing" armor scheme that maximized the armor thickness protecting the core of the ship by eliminating armor elsewhere. The design had two armored decks of medium thickness rather than the single thicker deck used formerly. The ships also used a new type of underwater protection system that successfully resisted penetration by {{convert|200|kg|sp=us|adj=on}} torpedo warheads in full-scale trials. It consisted of a deep water-tight compartment adjacent to the hull, backed by a thick torpedo bulkhead that connected to the side and deck armor plates, with a deep fuel oil tank behind it.Lengerer, pp. 4–5; Skwiot 2008, pp. 3, 8

Although the United States Navy planned to arm its {{sclass|Colorado|battleship|4}} with {{convert|16|in|mm|adj=on|0}} guns before the Nagato class was designed, Nagato{{'}}s {{convert|410|mm|adj=on|sp=us|1}} guns made her the first dreadnought that was launched armed with guns larger than {{convert|15|in|0}}.Lengerer, p. 4

On 12 June 1917, well before Mutsu was laid down, Hiraga proposed a revised design for the ship that reflected the lessons from the Battle of Jutland that had occurred the previous year, and incorporated advances in boiler technology. Given project number A-125, his design added an extra twin main-gun turret, using space and weight made available by the reduction of the number of boilers from 21 to 12, while the power remained the same. He reduced the secondary armament from 20 guns to 16, although they were raised in height to improve their ability to fire during heavy weather and to improve their arcs of fire. To increase the ship's protection he proposed angling the belt armor outwards to improve its resistance to horizontal fire, and increasing the thickness of the lower deck armor and the torpedo bulkhead. Hiraga also planned to add anti-torpedo bulges to improve underwater protection. He estimated that his ship would displace as much as Nagato, although it would cost about a million yen more. Hiraga's changes would have considerably delayed Mutsu{{'}}s completion and were rejected by the Navy Ministry.Lengerer, pp. 3, 6–7

The ships had a length of {{convert|201.17|m|ft|0|sp=us}} between perpendiculars and {{convert|215.8|m|ft|0|sp=us}} overall. They had a beam of {{convert|29.02|m|ftin|sp=us}} and a draft of {{convert|9.08|m|ftin|sp=us}}.Skwiot 2008, p. 4 The Nagato-class ships displaced {{convert|32720|t|LT|sp=us}} at standard load and {{convert|39116|t|LT|sp=us}} at full load.Whitley, p. 200 Their crew consisted of 1,333 officers and enlisted men as built and 1,368 in 1935.Jentschura, Jung & Mickel, p. 28 In 1944, the crew totaled around 1,734 men.Stille, p. 34

The Nagato class was equipped with a unique heptapodal (seven-legged) mast designed to maximize rigidity for range-finding purposes and survivability under shellfire. It consisted of a thick vertical leg in the center surrounded by six outer legs. The central leg was large enough to accommodate an electric elevator running between the foretop and main deck.Gardiner & Gray, p. 231 In November 1944, the tops of Nagato{{'}}s mainmast and funnel were removed to improve the arcs of fire for her anti-aircraft guns.

In 1927, Mutsu{{'}}s bow was remodeled to reduce the amount of spray produced when steaming into a head sea. This increased her overall length by {{convert|1.59|m|ftin|sp=us}} to {{convert|217.39|m|ftin|sp=us}}. This proved successful and her sister's bow was rebuilt in 1930. During their 1934–1936 reconstruction, the ships' sterns were lengthened by {{convert|7.55|m|ft|sp=us}} to improve their speed and their forward superstructures were rebuilt into a pagoda mast. They were given torpedo bulges to improve their underwater protection and to compensate for the weight of the additional armor and equipment. These changes increased their overall length to {{convert|224.94|m|ft|0|abbr=on}}, their beam to {{convert|34.6|m|ftin|abbr=on}} and their draft to {{convert|9.49|m|ftin|sp=us}}. Their displacement increased over {{convert|7000|t|LT|sp=us}} to {{convert|46690|t|LT|sp=us}} at deep load.Skwiot 2008, pp. 6, 9–10, 34, 71–72

The ships were equipped with four Gihon geared steam turbines, each of which drove one {{convert|4.19|m|ftin|adj=on|sp=us|0}} propeller. The turbines were designed to produce a total of {{convert|80000|shp|lk=on}}, using steam provided by 21 Kampon water-tube boilers; 15 of these were oil-fired while the remaining half-dozen used fuel oil that was sprayed on the coal to increase its burn rate. The boilers had a working pressure of {{convert|286|psi|kPa kg/cm2|0|abbr=on|lk=on}}.Skwiot 2008, pp. 43–44

The ships had a stowage capacity of {{convert|1600|LT|t|abbr=on|0}} of coal and {{convert|3400|LT|t|abbr=on|0}} of oil, giving them a range of {{convert|5500|nmi|lk=in}} at a speed of {{convert|16|kn|lk=in}}. Nagato exceeded her designed speed of {{convert|26.5|knots}} during her sea trials, reaching {{convert|26.7|kn}} at {{convert|85500|shp|abbr=on}} and Mutsu reached the same speed with {{convert|87500|shp|abbr=on}}. The US Navy did not learn their actual speed capability until about 1937; previously it had believed that the ships were capable of only {{convert|23|kn}}.

During refits in 1923–25, the fore funnel was rebuilt in a serpentine shape in an unsuccessful effort to prevent smoke interference with the bridge and fire-control systems. The rebuilt fore funnel was eliminated during the ships' 1930s reconstructions when their boilers were replaced by 10 oil-fired Kampon boilers, which had a working pressure of {{convert|313|psi|kPa kg/cm2|0|abbr=on}} and temperature of {{convert|300|°C}}.Skwiot 2008, pp. 73, 76–77 The turbines were also replaced by lighter, more modern, units and their propellers were replaced by larger {{convert|4.3|m|ftin|adj=on|sp=us|0}} ones. When the ships conducted their post-reconstruction trials, they reached a speed of {{convert|24.98|kn}} with {{convert|82300|shp|abbr=on}}.Skwiot 2008, pp. 43, 78 Additional fuel oil was stored in the bottoms of the newly added torpedo bulges, which increased their capacity to {{convert|5560|LT|t}} and thus their range to {{convert|8560|nmi|abbr=on}} at 16 knots.

File:41cm-45 3rd Year Type naval gun outside the Yamato Museum during October 2008.jpg in Kure, Japan]]

The main armament of the Nagato-class ships consisted of eight 45-caliber 41 cm/45 3rd Year Type naval gun naval guns, mounted in two pairs of twin-gun, superfiring turrets fore and aft. Numbered one through four from front to rear, the hydraulically powered turrets gave the guns an elevation range of −2 to +35 degrees. The rate of fire for the guns was around two rounds per minute. Their turrets were replaced in the mid-1930s using the turrets stored from the unfinished {{sclass|Tosa|battleship|2}}s. While in storage they were modified to increase their range of elevation to −3 to +43 degrees,Skwiot 2008, p. 19 which increased the gun's maximum range from {{convert|30200|to|37900|m|yd|sp=us}}.Friedman, p. 269

By World War II, the guns used Type 91 armor-piercing, capped shells. Each of these shells weighed {{convert|1020|kg|lb|sp=us}} and had a muzzle velocity of {{convert|780|m/s|ft/s|sp=us}}. Also available was a {{convert|936|kg|lb|sp=us|adj=on}} high-explosive shell that had a muzzle velocity of {{convert|805|m/s|ft/s|sp=us}}. A special Type 3 Sankaidan incendiary shrapnel shell was developed in the 1930s for anti-aircraft use.Campbell, pp. 175, 181–182

The ships' secondary armament of twenty 50-caliber 14 cm/50 3rd Year Type naval gun naval gun was mounted in casemates on the upper sides of the hull and in the superstructure. The latter guns had a maximum elevation of +20 degrees and the former could elevate to +25 degrees which gave them ranges of {{convert|15800|m|yd|sp=us}} and {{convert|17000|m|yd|sp=us}} respectively.Skwiot 2008, pp. 24, 73 Each gun could fire a {{convert|38|kg|lb|adj=on}} high-explosive projectile at a rate up to 10 rounds per minute.Campbell, p. 190 Anti-aircraft defense was provided by four 40-caliber 3rd Year Type 3-inch{{#tag:ref|These guns were license-built British quick-firing (QF) QF 12-pounder guns. While the Japanese designated them as 8 cm, their actual caliber was 76.2 millimeters.|group=Note}} AA guns in single mounts. The {{convert|3|in|adj=on|0}} high-angle guns had a maximum elevation of +75 degrees, and had a rate of fire of 13 to 20 rounds per minute. They fired a {{convert|6|kg|lb|abbr=on}} projectile with a muzzle velocity of {{convert|680|m/s|ft/s|abbr=on}} to a maximum height of {{convert|7500|m|ft|sp=us}}.Campbell, p. 198 The ships were also fitted with eight {{convert|53.3|cm|in|adj=on|sp=us|0}} torpedo tubes, four on each broadside, two above water and two submerged. They used the 6th Year Type torpedo which had a {{convert|203|kg|adj=on|sp=us}} warhead of Shimose powder. It had three settings for range and speed: {{convert|15500|m|yd|sp=us}} at {{convert|26|kn}}, {{convert|10000|m|yd|sp=us}} at {{convert|32|kn}}, or {{convert|7000|m|yd|sp=us}} at {{convert|37|kn}}.Skwiot 2008, p. 31

File:Nagato-class battleship.jpg

Around 1926, the four above-water torpedo tubes were removed and the ships received three additional 76-millimeter AA guns that were situated around the base of the foremast.Skwiot 2008, p. 70 They were replaced by eight 40-caliber 12.7-centimeter Type 89 dual-purpose guns in 1932,Hackett, Kingsepp & Ahlberg, Nagato fitted on both sides of the fore and aft superstructures in four twin-gun mounts.Whitley, p. 202 When firing at surface targets, the guns had a range of {{convert|14700|m|yd|sp=us}}. Their maximum rate of fire was 14 rounds a minute, but their sustained rate of fire was around eight rounds per minute.Campbell, pp. 192–193 Two twin-gun mounts for license-built Vickers 2-pounder light AA guns were also added to the ship that same year.{{#tag:ref|Skwiot says two single mounts in 1932–34 and another pair, mounted near the aft funnel, were added in 1934.Skwiot 2008, pp. 26, 72|group=Note}} They had a rate of fire of 200 rounds per minute.Campbell, p. 74

When the ships were reconstructed in 1934–36, the remaining torpedo tubes and the two forward 14-centimeter guns were removed from the hull. All of the remaining 14-centimeter guns had their elevation increased to +35 degrees which increased their range to {{convert|20000|m|yd|sp=us}}. An unknown number of license-built 13.2-millimeter Hotchkiss machine guns in twin mounts were also added. The maximum range of these guns was {{convert|6500|m|yd|sp=us}},Skwiot 2008, pp. 33, 72–73 but the effective range against aircraft was {{convert|700|-|1500|m|yd|sp=us}}. The cyclic rate was adjustable between 425 and 475 rounds per minute, but the need to change the 30-round magazines reduced the effective rate to 250 rounds per minute.Campbell, p. 202

The 2-pounders were replaced in 1939 by 20 license-built Hotchkiss 25-millimeter Type 96 light AA guns in a mixture of twin-gun and single mounts.Hackett, Kingsepp & Ahlberg, Mutsu and Nagato This was the standard Japanese light AA gun during World War II, but it suffered from severe design shortcomings that rendered it a largely ineffective weapon. According to historian Mark Stille, the twin and triple mounts "lacked sufficient speed in train or elevation; the gun sights were unable to handle fast targets; the gun exhibited excessive vibration; the magazine was too small, and, finally, the gun produced excessive muzzle blast".Stille, p. 11 These {{convert|25|mm|in|adj=on|sp=us}} guns had an effective range of {{convert|1500|-|3000|m|yd|sp=us}}. The maximum effective rate of fire was only between 110 and 120 rounds per minute because of the frequent need to change the 15-round magazines.Campbell, p. 200 As far as is known, no additional AA guns were installed aboard Mutsu before her loss. Additional 25-millimeter guns were installed aboard Nagato during the war; on 10 July 1944, she was reported to have 98 guns on board. An additional 30 guns were added during a refit in Yokosuka in November. Two more twin 127-millimeter gun mounts were added at the same time abreast the funnelSkwiot 2008, p. 80 and all of her 14-centimeter guns were removed as she was now a floating anti-aircraft battery.

File:Nagatoarmor.svg

The Nagato-class ships' waterline armor belt was made from Vickers cemented armor and protected {{convert|137.14|m|ft|sp=us}} of the hull between the barbettes of the end turrets. The lower strake was {{convert|305|mm|in|0|abbr=on}} thick, {{convert|2.7|m|ftin|sp=us}} high, and tapered to a thickness of {{convert|100|mm|in|abbr=on}} at its bottom edge; above it was a strake of {{convert|229|mm|in|abbr=on|0}} armor that was {{convert|1.7|m|ftin|sp=us}} high. Approximately {{convert|1.77|m|ftin|sp=us}} of the armor belt was below the waterline. The turrets were protected with an armor thickness of 305 mm on the face, {{convert|230|-|190|mm|in|abbr=on|1}} on the sides, and {{convert|152|-|127|mm|in|abbr=on|0}} on the roof. The barbettes were protected by armor 305 mm thick, while the casemates of the 140 mm guns were protected by 25 mm armor plates. The sides of the conning tower were {{convert|369|mm|in|abbr=on}} thick.

The main deck armor consisted of three layers of high-tensile steel (HTS) {{convert|69|mm|in|abbr=on|1}} thick that connected to the top of the upper strake of side armor. The flat portion of the lower deck had one layer of Ducol steel 25 mm thick with two layers of HTS of equal thickness above it. About {{convert|3|m|ftin|sp=us}} from the side of the hull, this deck, now composed of three layers of HTS, totaling {{convert|75|mm|in|abbr=on|0}} in thickness, sloped downwards where it met a short horizontal armored (three layers of HTS with a total thickness of {{convert|66|mm|in|abbr=on|0}}) deck that connected to the main armored belt and the torpedo bulkhead. This was also made up of three 25 mm layers of HTS{{#tag:ref|This was intended to be a single plate of New Vickers non-cemented armor of equal thickness, but it could not be formed into the required shape.Lengerer, footnote 8|group=Note}} and curved up and outwards to meet the short horizontal armored deck. It enclosed a water-tight compartment that was {{convert|3.05|m|ftin|sp=us}} from the side of the ship. It was backed by fuel oil tanks {{convert|3.13|m|ftin|sp=us}} deep.Skwiot 2008, pp. 3, 10–11 The outermost void was designed to allow the explosive force of a torpedo's warhead to dissipate as much as possible while the oil tank was supposed to stop any fragments from penetrating the innermost bulkhead protecting the ship's vital areas.Lengerer, pp. 4–5

The new 41 cm turrets installed during their reconstruction were more heavily armored than the original ones. Face armor was increased to {{convert|460|mm|in|abbr=on|0}}, the sides to {{convert|280|mm|in|abbr=on|0}}, and the roof to {{convert|230|-|250|mm|in|abbr=on|0}}.Campbell, p. 182 The armor over the machinery and magazines was increased by {{convert|38|mm|in|abbr=on|1}} on the upper deck and 25 mm on the upper armored deck. The torpedo bulges added at the same time were {{convert|13.5|m|ftin|sp=us}} high and {{convert|2.84|m|ftin|sp=us}} deep. They were divided into four compartments, the lower two of which were filled with oil and the others remained empty.Skwiot 2008, pp. 9, 73 These additions increased the weight of each ship's armor to {{convert|13032|t|LT|sp=us}}, 32.6 percent of their displacement.Stille, p. 32 In early 1941, as a preparation for war, the uppermost compartment of the bulges was filled with sealed steel crushing tubes and the barbette armor of both ships was reinforced with 100 mm armor plates above the main deck and {{convert|215|mm|in|abbr=on}} plates below it.Chesneau, p. 172

File:Nagato1924.jpg

The Nagato-class ships were fitted with a {{convert|10|m|ftin|adj=on|sp=us}} rangefinder in the forward superstructure; {{convert|6|m|ftin|adj=on|sp=us|spell=in}} and {{convert|3|m|ftin|adj=on|sp=us|spell=in}} anti-aircraft rangefinders were added in the early 1920s. The rangefinders in the two superfiring turrets were replaced by 10-meter units in 1932–33.Skwiot 2008, pp. 34, 72

They were initially fitted with a Type 13 fire-control system derived from Vickers equipment received during World War I, but this was replaced by an improved Type 14 system around 1925. It controlled the main and secondary guns; no provision was made for anti-aircraft fire until the Type 31 fire-control director was introduced in 1932. A modified Type 14 fire-control system was tested aboard Nagato in 1935, and later approved for service as the Type 34. A new anti-aircraft director, designated the Type 94, used to control the 127 mm AA guns, was introduced in 1937, although it is unknown when they were installed on the ships. The 25 mm AA guns were controlled by a Type 95 director that was also introduced in 1937.Skwiot 2008, pp. 33–37

As far as is known, no radars were installed aboard Mutsu before her loss. While in drydock in May 1943, a Type 21 air-search radar was installed aboard Nagato on the roof of the 10-meter rangefinder at the top of the pagoda mast. On 27 June 1944, two Type 22 surface-search radars were installed on the pagoda mast and two Type 13 early warning radars were fitted on her mainmast.

Nagato was briefly fitted with an {{convert|18|m|ftin|sp=us|adj=on}}Skwiot 2008, p. 47 aircraft flying-off platform on No. 2 turret in August 1925. Yokosuka Ro-go Ko-gata and Heinkel HD 25 floatplanes were tested from it before it was removed early the following year. An additional boom was added to the mainmasts of both ships in 1926 to handle the Yokosuka E1Y then assigned to them. A Hansa-Brandenburg W.33 floatplane was tested aboard Nagato that same year. A catapult was fitted between the mainmast and No. 3 turretSkwiot 2008, p. 57 in mid-1933, a collapsible crane was installed in a portside sponson, and the ships were equipped to operate two or three floatplanes, although no hangar was provided. The sisters began to operate Nakajima E4N2 biplanes until they were replaced by Nakajima E8N2 biplanes in 1938. A more powerful catapult was installed in November 1938 to handle heavier aircraft like the one Kawanishi E7K that was added in 1939–40. Mitsubishi F1M biplanes replaced the E8Ns on 11 February 1943.Skwiot 2008, pp. 54, 57

File:Mutsu1921.jpg

While Mutsu was still fitting out, the American government decided to call a conference in Washington, D.C. to forestall the massively expensive naval arms race between the United States, the United Kingdom and the Empire of Japan that was developing. The Washington Naval Conference convened on 12 November, and the Americans proposed to scrap virtually every capital ship under construction or fitting out among the participating nations. Mutsu was specifically listed among those to be scrapped even though she had been commissioned a few weeks earlier. This was unacceptable to the Japanese delegation and they agreed to a compromise that allowed them to keep Mutsu in exchange for scrapping the obsolete dreadnought {{ship|Japanese battleship|Settsu||2}} and a similar arrangement for several American Colorado-class dreadnoughts that were fitting out.Skwiot 2008, pp. 17–19, 21

File:IJN BS Nagato 1920s.jpg

Upon commissioning, the sister ships were assigned to the 1st Battleship Division, although Nagato became the flagship of Rear Admiral Sōjirō Tochinai, a role she often fulfilled during her career. The ships hosted Edward, Prince of Wales, and his aide-de-camp Lieutenant Louis Mountbatten in 1922 during the prince's visit to Japan. After the 1923 Great Kantō earthquake, both ships loaded supplies from Kyushu for the victims on 4 September. They sank the hulk of the obsolete battleship {{ship|Japanese battleship|Satsuma||2}} on 7 September 1924 during gunnery practice in Tokyo Bay in accordance with the Washington Naval Treaty. Nagato became flagship of the Combined Fleet on 1 December 1925, flying the flag of Admiral Keisuke Okada. The sisters were placed in reserve several times during the 1920s while they were being modernized. Mutsu served as flagship of Emperor Hirohito during the 1927 naval maneuvers and fleet review and again in 1933.Hackett, Kingsepp & Ahlberg, Mutsu

File:NagatoFiring1936.jpg

The ships were reconstructed from late 1933 to mid-1936. In August 1937, the sisters transported 3,749 men of the 11th Infantry Division to Shanghai during the Second Sino-Japanese War. Their floatplanes bombed targets in Shanghai on 24 August before they returned to Sasebo the following day.Skwiot 2007, pp. 36, 81 Nagato became a training ship on 1 December 1937 until she again became the flagship of the Combined Fleet on 15 December 1938. The ship participated in an Imperial Fleet Review on 11 October 1940. The sisters were refitted in 1941 in preparation for war, which included the fitting of external degaussing coils and additional armor for their barbettes.

Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto issued the code phrase "Niitaka yama nobore" (Climb Mount Niitaka) on 2 December 1941 from Nagato at anchor at Hashirajima to signal the 1st Air Fleet (Kido Butai) to proceed with its attack on Pearl Harbor. When Japan began the Pacific War on 8 December,Japan Standard Time is 19 hours ahead of Hawaiian Standard Time, so in Japan, the attack on Pearl Harbor happened on 8 December. the sisters sortied for the Bonin Islands, along with the four ships of Battleship Division 2 and the light carrier {{ship|Japanese aircraft carrier|Hōshō||2}} as distant cover for the fleet attacking Pearl Harbor, and returned six days later. Yamamoto transferred his flag to the new battleship {{ship|Japanese battleship|Yamato||2}} on 12 February 1942.

In June 1942, Mutsu and Nagato were assigned to the Main Body of the 1st Fleet during the Battle of Midway, together with Yamato, Hōshō, the light cruiser {{ship|Japanese cruiser|Sendai||2}} and nine destroyers.Rohwer, pp. 168–169Parshall & Tully, p. 453 Following the loss of all four fleet carriers of the "Kido Butai" on 4 June, Yamamoto attempted to lure the American forces west to within range of the Japanese air groups at Wake Island, and into a night engagement with his surface forces, but the American forces withdrew and Mutsu saw no action. After rendezvousing with the remnants of the Striking Force on 6 June, over half of the survivors from the sunken aircraft carriers of the 1st Air Fleet were transferred to Mutsu and Nagato.Parshall & Tully, pp. 382–383 They arrived at Hashirajima on 14 June.

On 14 July, both ships were reassigned to Battleship Division 2 and Nagato became the flagship of the 1st Fleet. She remained in Japanese waters training until August 1942. Mutsu was transferred to the Advance Force of the 2nd Fleet on 9 August, and departed Yokosuka two days later to support operations during the Guadalcanal Campaign. She arrived at Truk on 17 August. On 20 August, while sailing from Truk to rendezvous with the main body of Vice Admiral Chūichi Nagumo's 3rd Fleet, Mutsu, the heavy cruiser {{ship|Japanese cruiser|Atago||2}}, and escorting destroyers unsuccessfully attempted to locate the escort carrier {{USS|Long Island|CVE-1|6}} in response to a flying boat detection of the American ship.

During the Battle of the Eastern Solomons on 27 August, Mutsu, assigned to the Support Force,Rohwer, p. 190 fired four shells at enemy reconnaissance aircraft during what was her first, and only, action of the war.Williams, p. 125 On 7 January 1943, Mutsu returned to Japan together with the carrier {{ship|Japanese aircraft carrier|Zuikaku||2}}, the heavy cruiser {{ship|Japanese cruiser|Suzuya|1934|2}} and four destroyers. The ship prepared to sortie on 13 April to reinforce the Japanese garrisons in the Aleutian Islands in response to the Battle of the Komandorski Islands, but the operation was cancelled the next day and Mutsu resumed training.

On 8 June 1943, Mutsu was moored at Hashirajima when the magazine of her No. 3 turret exploded at 12:13, cutting the ship in half. The forward section capsized almost immediately, but the rear section remained afloat until the early morning of the next day. Nearby ships were able to rescue 353 survivors from the 1,474 crew members and visitors aboard Mutsu, meaning that 1,121 men were killed in the explosion. To avert the potential damage to morale from the loss of a battleship, Mutsu{{'}}s loss was declared a state secret. To further prevent rumors from spreading, many survivors were reassigned to various garrisons in the Pacific Ocean.Williams, pp. 132–133

The IJN convened a commission three days after the sinking to investigate the loss. It issued its preliminary conclusions on 25 June, well before the investigation of the wreck was completed, and decided that the explosion was the result of a disgruntled seaman. The commission failed to consider the possibility of fire, which historian Mike Williams considers to be a possible cause, as a number of observers noted smoke coming from the vicinity of No. 3 turret. The truth, however, will never be known.Williams, pp. 135, 142

File:Nagato1944.png

Nagato transferred to Truk in the Caroline Islands in August 1943. Together with the bulk of the 1st Fleet, she sortied in September and October in unsuccessful searches for American carriers. On 1 February 1944, Nagato departed Truk to avoid an American air raid, and arrived at Palau three days later. The ship arrived on 21 February at Lingga Island, near Singapore, and she became the flagship of Vice Admiral Matome Ugaki, commander of Battleship Division 1, on 25 February until he transferred his flag to Yamato on 5 May. Nagato remained at Lingga until 11 May when she was transferred to Tawitawi on 12 May, and assigned to the 1st Mobile Fleet, under the command of Vice Admiral Jisaburō Ozawa.

Battleship Division 1 rendezvoused with Ozawa's main force on 16 June near the Mariana Islands, and Nagato escorted three aircraft carriers during the Battle of the Philippine Sea. She was only lightly engaged during the battle, was not damaged, and suffered no casualties. After the battle, the ship returned to Japan where she was refitted with additional radars and light AA guns. Nagato loaded a regiment of the 28th Infantry Division and delivered them at Okinawa on 11 July before continuing on to Lingga.Skwiot 2007, p. 46

File:Japanese Battleship Nagato 1944.jpg, 21 October 1944, shortly before the Battle of Leyte Gulf]]

In October 1944, the ship took part in "Operation Sho-1", an attack on the Allied landings on Leyte. Assigned to Vice Admiral Takeo Kurita's 1st Diversion Force (also known as the Center Force), Nagato was attacked by multiple waves of American dive bombers and fighters during the Battle of the Sibuyan Sea on 24 October en route to Leyte Gulf. She was struck twice by bombs that killed 52 crewmen, but was not seriously damaged.Skwiot 2007, p. 51

The next morning, the 1st Diversion Force attacked the American forces supporting the invasion in the Battle off Samar. Nagato engaged the escort carriers and destroyers of Task Group 77.4.3, codenamed "Taffy 3". She opened fire on three escort carriers, the first time she had fired her guns at an enemy ship, but missed. One of the defending destroyers fired a spread of torpedoes that missed their intended target and headed for Yamato and Nagato which were on a parallel course. The two battleships were forced to turn away north to avoid the torpedoes, and were 10 miles (16 km) away from the engagement before the torpedoes ran out of fuel. Turning back, Nagato engaged the American ships, claiming damage to one cruiser.{{#tag:ref|No cruisers were present, only destroyers and destroyer escorts.|group=Note}} Later in the day, Nagato was hit in the bow by two bombs, but the damage was not severe.

The ship returned to Japan for repairs in mid-November. Lack of fuel and materials meant that she could not be brought back into service and she was turned into a floating anti-aircraft battery. Her funnel and mainmast were removed to improve the arcs of fire of her AA guns, which were increased by two Type 89 mounts and nine triple 25 mm gun mounts. Her forward secondary guns were removed in compensation. A coal-burning donkey boiler was installed on the pier for heating and cooking purposes and a converted submarine chaser was moored alongside to provide steam and electricity; her anti-aircraft guns lacked full power and were only partially operational. On 20 April Nagato was reduced to reserve. In June 1945, all of her secondary guns and about half of her anti-aircraft armament was moved ashore, together with her rangefinders and searchlights. Her crew was therefore reduced to less than 1,000 officers and enlisted men. On 18 July 1945, the heavily camouflaged ship was attacked by carrier-based fighter bombers and torpedo bombers. Nagato was hit by two bombs and a rocket that killed 35 men and damaged four 25 mm guns. On 30 August, a few days before the formal surrender, American sailors took control of the ship.

File:Crossroads Baker Base Surge.jpg

Nagato was selected to participate as a target ship in Operation Crossroads, a series of U.S. nuclear weapon tests held at Bikini Atoll in mid-1946. In mid-March, Nagato departed Yokosuka for Eniwetok, but her hull had not been repaired from the underwater damage sustained during the attack on 18 July and she leaked enough that her pumps could not keep up. The ship had a list of seven degrees to port by the time tugboats from Eniwetok arrived. She reached the atoll on 4 April and Bikini in May.

Operation Crossroads began with the first blast (Test Able), an air burst on 1 July 1946; Nagato was not close to ground zero and was only lightly damaged. For Test Baker, an underwater explosion, the ship was positioned closer to ground zero. Nagato rode out the tsunami of water from the explosion with little apparent damage; she had a slight starboard list of two degrees after the tsunami dissipated. A more thorough assessment could not be made because she was dangerously radioactive. Her list gradually increased over the next five days and she capsized during the night of 29/30 July. Opened to divers in 1996,{{cite web|url=http://www.bikiniatoll.com/divetour.html|title=Bikini Atoll Dive Tourism Information|publisher=Bikini Atoll Divers|access-date=8 January 2014}} Nagato was named by The Times as one of the top 10 wreck diving sites in the world.{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/travel/holiday_type/winter_sports/article1461444.ece|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110924120359/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/travel/holiday_type/winter_sports/article1461444.ece|url-status=dead|archive-date=24 September 2011|title=World's Best Wreck Diving|newspaper=The Times|date=3 March 2007|access-date=11 September 2009 | location=London | first=Tim | last=Ecott}}{{subscription required}}

Mutsu{{'}}s wreck in Japan was treated differently. In 1970, salvage operations began that lasted until 1978 and recovered about 75% of the ship. The salvagers recovered bodies of 849 crewmen killed during the explosion. In 1995, the Mutsu Memorial Museum declared that no further salvage operations were planned. The only significant portion of the ship that remains is a {{convert|35|m|ftin|adj=on|sp=us}} long section running from the bridge structure forward to the vicinity of No. 1 turret. The highest portion of the ship is {{convert|12|m|ftin|sp=us}} below the surface. Many, but not all, artifacts are displayed at the Mutsu Memorial Museum in Tōwa-Cho. Since 1963, a memorial service has been held there every year on 8 June in honor of the crew.Williams, pp. 138–141

{{reflist|group=Note}}

{{reflist|30em}}

• {{cite book|last=Campbell|first=John|title=Naval Weapons of World War II|year=1985|publisher=Naval Institute Press|location=Annapolis, Maryland|isbn=0-87021-459-4}}
• {{cite book|title=Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1922–1946|editor1-last=Chesneau|editor1-first=Roger|publisher=Conway Maritime Press|location=Greenwich, UK|year=1980|isbn=0-85177-146-7}}
• {{cite book

| last1 = Evans

| first1 = David C.

| last2 = Peattie

| first2 = Mark R.

| title = Kaigun: Strategy, Tactics, and Technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1887–1941

| location = Annapolis, Maryland

| publisher = Naval Institute Press

| year = 1997

| isbn = 0-87021-192-7

| author-link2 = Mark Peattie|name-list-style=amp

}}

• {{cite book|last=Friedman|first=Norman|title=Naval Weapons of World War One|publisher=Seaforth|location=Barnsley, South Yorkshire, UK|year=2011|isbn=978-1-84832-100-7}}
• {{cite book |editor1-last=Gardiner |editor1-first=Robert |editor2-last=Gray |editor2-first=Randal |title=Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921 |year=1985 |location=Annapolis, Maryland|publisher=Naval Institute Press |isbn=0-87021-907-3|name-list-style=amp }}
• {{cite web|url=http://www.combinedfleet.com/Mutsu.html|title=IJN Mutsu: Tabular Record of Movement|last1=Hackett|first1=Bob|last2=Kingsepp|first2=Sander |last3=Ahlberg|first3=Lars|year=2009|publisher=Combinedfleet.com|access-date=15 May 2013|name-list-style=amp}}
• {{cite web|url=http://www.combinedfleet.com/nagatrom.htm|title=IJN Nagato: Tabular Record of Movement|last1=Hackett|first1=Bob|last2=Kingsepp|first2=Sander |last3=Ahlberg|first3=Lars|year=2009|publisher=Combinedfleet.com|access-date=15 May 2013|name-list-style=amp}}
• {{cite book| last1 = Jentschura| first1 = Hansgeorg| first2 = Dieter |last2=Jung|first3=Peter |last3=Mickel| year = 1977| title = Warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1869–1945| publisher = United States Naval Institute| location = Annapolis, Maryland| isbn = 0-87021-893-X|name-list-style=amp}}
• {{cite journal

| last1 = Lengerer

| first1 = Hans

| editor1-last = Ahlberg

| editor1-first = Lars

| title = Battleships of the Kaga Class and the So-called Tosa Experiments

| date = June 2010

| journal = Contributions to the History of Imperial Japanese Warships

| issue = Special Paper I

| pages = 1–26}}

• {{cite book |last1=Parshall |first1=Jonathan |last2=Tully |first2=Anthony |title=Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway |publisher=Potomac Books |location=Washington, D. C. |year=2007 |isbn=978-1-57488-924-6 |name-list-style=amp |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/shatteredswordun0000pars }}
• {{cite book |author=Rohwer, Jurgen |title=Chronology of the War at Sea, 1939–1945: The Naval History of World War Two |publisher=Naval Institute Press |location=Annapolis, Maryland |year=2005 |isbn=1-59114-119-2 }}
• {{cite book|last=Silverstone|first=Paul H.|title=Directory of the World's Capital Ships|year=1984|publisher=Hippocrene Books|location=New York|isbn=0-88254-979-0}}
• {{cite book|last=Skwiot|first=Miroslaw|title=Nagato Mutsu, Part I|series=Encyklopedua Okretów Wojennych|volume=51|year=2007|publisher=AJ-Press|location=Gdansk, Poland|isbn=978-83-7237-184-3}}
• {{cite book|last=Skwiot|first=Miroslaw|title=Nagato Mutsu, Part II|series=Encyklopedia Okretów Wojennych|volume=52|year=2008|publisher=AJ-Press|location=Gdansk, Poland|isbn=978-83-7237-202-4}}
• {{cite book |last=Stille |first=Mark |title=Imperial Japanese Navy Battleships 1941–45| series =New Vanguard|volume=146 |publisher=Osprey Publishing |location=Botley, Oxford, UK |year=2008 |isbn=978-1-84603-280-6 }}
• {{cite web|last=Tully|first=A.P.|title=Nagato's Last Year: July 1945 – July 1946|url=http://www.combinedfleet.com/picposts/Nagatostory.html|work=Mysteries/Untold Sagas of the Imperial Japanese Navy|publisher=Combinedfleet.com|access-date=26 May 2013|year=2003}}
• {{Cite book |last=Whitley|first=M. J.|title=Battleships of World War II|year=1998|location=Annapolis, Maryland|publisher=Naval Institute Press|isbn=1-55750-184-X}}
• {{cite book|last=Williams| first=Mike

| chapter = Mutsu – An Exploration of the Circumstances Surrounding her Loss

| editor = Jordan, John

| publisher = Conway| location=London

| year = 2009

| title = Warship 2009

| pages = 125–142| isbn=978-1-84486-089-0

}}

{{Commons category|Nagato class battleship|Nagato-class battleship}}

• [http://www.maritimequest.com/warship_directory/japan/battleships/mitsu_page_1.htm Maritimequest.com: Mutsu photo gallery] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200724214524/http://www.maritimequest.com/warship_directory/japan/battleships/mitsu_page_1.htm |date=24 July 2020 }}
• [http://www.maritimequest.com/warship_directory/japan/battleships/nagato_page_1.htm Maritimequest.com: Nagato photo gallery]

{{Nagato class battleship}}

{{WWI Japanese ships}}

{{WWII Japanese ships}}

{{featured article}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Nagato Class Battleship}}

Category:Battleship classes