Operation Linebacker

{{Further|topic=the PAVN offensive|Easter Offensive}}

At midday on 30 March 1972, 30,000 PAVN troops, supported by regiments of tanks and artillery, rolled southward across the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) that separated the two Vietnams.Maj. A.J.C. Lavalle, ed. Airpower and the 1972 Spring Offensive. Maxwell AFB AL: Air University Press, 1976, p. 4. This three-division force caught the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) and their American allies unprepared.David Fulghum & Terrance Maitland, et al., South Vietnam on Trial. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1984, p. 138. The PAVN force struck the defensive positions of the ARVN 3rd Division and threw it into disarray. ARVN forces then fell back, and a race began between both belligerents to the bridges at Đông Hà and Cam Lộ.{{cite book|last=Melson|first=Charles|title=U.S. Marines In Vietnam: The War That Would Not End, 1971–1973|publisher=History and Museums Division, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps|year=1991|url=https://archive.org/details/TheWarThatWouldNotEnd|isbn=9781482384055}}{{PD-notice}}{{rp|50–63}}

By 4 April, ARVN officers had patched together a defensive line that held the PAVN at bay, but it was only a temporary respite.Fulghum and Maitland, p. 141. Although the conventional attack by the PAVN, which included the extensive use of armor and heavy artillery, riveted the attention of the allies on the northern provinces, it was only the first of three such operations that were launched that spring. On 5 April, a PAVN force of 20,000 crossed the border from their sanctuaries in Cambodia in another three-division, combined arms force to attack Bình Long Province, north of Saigon.Lavalle, p. 6. They quickly seized the town of Lộc Ninh and then surrounded the town of An Lộc, cutting the road to the capital.{{Cite book |last=Andrade |first=Dale |year=1995 |title=Trial by Fire: The 1972 Easter Offensive, America's Last Vietnam Battle |location=New York |publisher=Hippocrene Books|page=73}}

On 12 April, the PAVN struck again, this time moving in from eastern Laos and seizing a series of border outposts around Đắk Tô in Kon Tum Province in the Central Highlands.Fulghum and Maitland, pp. 154–158. The PAVN then proceeded east toward the provincial capital of Kon Tum. Hanoi had initiated the offensive to coincide with the winter monsoon, when continuous rain and low cloud cover made air support difficult.Earl H. Tilford, Setup: What the Air Force Did in Vietnam and Why. Maxwell AFB AL: Air University Press, 1991, p. 225.

The initial U.S. response to the offensive was lackadaisical and confused.Fulghum and Maitland, pp. 141–142. The Pentagon was not unduly alarmed and the U.S. Ambassador to South Vietnam and Commander, U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, General Creighton W. Abrams, were both out of the country. President Richard Nixon's first response was to consider a three-day attack by Boeing B-52 Stratofortress heavy bombers on Hanoi and the port city of Haiphong. His National Security Advisor, Dr. Henry Kissinger, convinced Nixon to reconsider, since he did not want to jeopardize the formalization of the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I) with the Soviet Union, that was due to be signed in May.Tilford, p. 234. Another stumbling block to the plan was Abrams' desire to utilize the available bombers (with their all-weather capability) to support the ARVN defense.Fulghum and Maitland, p. 170.

Nixon and Kissinger considered a plan offered by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to be both unimaginative and lacking in aggression.Fulghum and Maitland, p. 142. On 4 April, Nixon authorized the bombing of North Vietnam (which had been limited to reprisal raids just above the DMZ) up to the 18th parallel.Tilford, p. 228. To prevent a total ARVN collapse and to protect American prestige during the upcoming summit meeting with Soviet general secretary Leonid Brezhnev, Nixon decided to risk a massive escalation of force.Tilford, p. 232

Due to the continuous withdrawal of American forces as part of the policy of Vietnamization, at the time of the invasion fewer than 10,000 U.S. combat troops remained in South Vietnam, and most of them were scheduled to leave within the next six months.Michael Casey, Clark Dougan, Samuel Lipsman, Jack Sweetman, Stephen Weiss, et al., Flags into Battle. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1987, p. 182. The number of combat aircraft stationed in Southeast Asia was less than half that of its peak strength in 1968–1969. At the beginning of 1972, the U.S. Air Force (USAF) had only three squadrons of McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II fighter-bombers and one squadron of Cessna A-37 Dragonfly light attack aircraft, a total of 76 aircraft, stationed in South Vietnam.Lavalle, p. 12. Another 114 fighter-bombers were located at bases in Thailand. 83 B-52s were stationed at U-Tapao RTAFB, Thailand and at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.Tilford, pp. 223–224. The U.S. Navy (USN)'s Task Force 77 (stationed in the Gulf of Tonkin), had four aircraft carriers assigned to it, but only two were available at any one time to conduct operations. Their air wings had approximately 140 aircraft.John Morocco, Rain of Fire. Boston: Boston Publishing Company, 1985, p. 170.

American and Republic of Vietnam Air Force (RVNAF) aircraft had been supporting the defense (weather permitting) since the beginning of the offensive. These strikes were conducted in support of ARVN forces, and included those of the air wings of the carriers {{USS|Coral Sea|CV-43|6}} and {{USS|Hancock|CV-19|6}}. The bad weather limited the ability of the U.S. aircraft to assist in stemming the North Vietnamese onslaught. By 6 April, at naval and air bases around the globe, American forces were put on alert and ships and aircraft squadrons began moving toward Southeast Asia.{{Cite book |last=Morrocco |first=John |year=1985 |title=Rain of Fire: Air War, 1969–1973 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/rainoffire00time |location=Boston |publisher=Boston Publishing Company |isbn=0-939526-14-X|page=170}}

The U.S. began a rapid build-up of airpower. The USAF deployed 176 F-4s and 12 F-105 Thunderchiefs from bases in the Republic of Korea and the U.S. to Thailand between 1 April and 11 May in Operation Constant Guard.Lavalle, pp. 19, 23–25. Also see Morocco, pp. 108–109. Strategic Air Command (SAC) dispatched 124 B-52s from the U.S. to Guam bringing the total B-52 strength available for operations to 209.Tilford, p. 224. The USN cut short its port period for the carriers {{USS|Kitty Hawk|CV-63|6}} and {{USS|Constellation|CV-64|6}} and ordered {{USS|Midway|CV-41|6}}, {{USS|America|CV-66|6}} and {{USS|Saratoga|CV-60|6}} to augment the fleet so that four or more carrier air wings could conduct missions simultaneously. 7th Fleet assets in local waters were thereby increased from 84 to 138 ships.

USAF tactical strikes against North Vietnam north of the 20th parallel were authorized on 5 April under the nickname Freedom Train. The first mass B-52 raid directed against the north was conducted on 10 April when 12 B-52s, supported by 53 attack aircraft, struck petroleum storage facilities around Vinh.Wayne To Hanoi and Back. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 2000, p. 225. By 12 April, Nixon had informed Kissinger that he had decided on a more comprehensive bombing campaign which would include strikes against both Hanoi and Haiphong.

File:North Vietnamese Antiaircraft Weapons.jpg

The following day 18 B-52s struck Thanh Hóa's Bai Thuong Air Base. Three more days followed before another strike, this time by another 18 bombers in a pre-dawn attack against an oil tank farm outside Haiphong. They were followed by more than 100 tactical aircraft attacking targets around Hanoi and Haiphong during daylight. Between 6 and 15 April, U.S. aircraft also struck and destroyed the Paul Doumer and Thanh Hóa bridges and the Yên Viên railway marshalling yard. This marked the introduction of laser-guided bombs against strategic targets in North Vietnam. Both bridges had previously been attacked unsuccessfully with conventional bombs and even missiles. The B-52s were then withdrawn from operations in the north and when they returned in June, their missions would be limited to South Vietnam.Thompson, p. 229.

By mid-month, nearly all of North Vietnam had been cleared for bombing raids for the first time in over three years. Air Force and Navy commanders and pilots were relieved that Nixon (unlike President Johnson) left the operational planning to local commanders and loosened the targeting restrictions that had hampered Operation Rolling Thunder.Stanley Karnow, Vietnam. New York: Viking, 1983, p. 643. Between 1 May and 30 June B-52s, fighter-bombers, and gunships had flown 18,000 sorties against formidable anti-aircraft defenses with the loss of 29 aircraft.Casey, Dougan, Lipsman, p. 39.

The U.S. also now began what North Vietnamese historians have described as "using devious political and diplomatic schemes...to cut back the amount of aid being supplied to us by socialist nations".Van Thai & Van Quang 2002, p. 299. On 20 April Kissinger met secretly with Brezhnev in Moscow. Unwilling to jeopardize the normalisation of relations with the West and wary of Washington's growing relationship with Beijing, Brezhnev agreed to apply pressure to Hanoi to end the offensive and negotiate seriously.On 21 February 1972 Nixon had landed in Beijing for his dramatic diplomatic breakthrough with the People's Republic of China. The Chinese, who had previously hoped that a long war in Southeast Asia would bleed both the Americans and their Vietnamese neighbors, now feared that a decline in American power would deprive them of a counterweight to the Soviet Union. Karnow, p. 638.

Brezhnev then arranged for another secret meeting between Kissinger and Hanoi's lead negotiator Le Duc Tho, to be held on 2 May in Paris. On the day, the two men met for a session that Kissinger later described as "brutal and insulting."Fulghum and Maitland, p. 179. The North Vietnamese, sensing victory, were in no mood to make concessions. As a result of this meeting and the fall of Quảng Trị City Nixon was prepared to up the ante, stating that "the bastards have never been bombed like they're going to be bombed this time".Fulghum and Maitland, p. 168.

{{Main|Operation Pocket Money}}

On 27 April, ARVN defenses in Quảng Trị Province began to collapse. Due to conflicting orders from their high command, ARVN units joined an exodus of refugees heading southwards, abandoning Quảng Trị city.Dale Andrade, Trial by Fire. New York: Hippocrene Books, 1995 p. 52. PAVN forces entered the city on the same day as the meeting between Kissinger and Le Duc Tho. The PAVN offensive had become a massive conventional military operation that was being conducted on three fronts simultaneously, involving the equivalent of 15 divisions and 600 tanks.Dave Richard Palmer, Summons of the Trumpet, New York: Ballentine, 1978, p. 317. As the North Vietnamese continued to gain ground in three of South Vietnam's four military regions, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff updated their contingency plans (drawn up before the bombing halt of 1968) for the resumption of bombing in the north and recommended it to the President, who approved it on 8 May.Tilford, p. 233.

Shortly after his inauguration, Nixon had ordered the preparation of a contingency plan, one that would hopefully bring the Vietnam War to an end.Morocco, p. 130. Operation Duck Hook was to include an invasion of the North and included a proposal to mine its major harbors.Fulghum and Maitland, p. 144. The plan had been shelved at the time as too extreme but it had not been forgotten. The USN had also been updating its own contingency plans for just such a mining operation since 1965. On 5 May, Nixon ordered the Joint Chiefs to prepare to execute the aerial mining portion of the Duck Hook plan within three days under the operational title Pocket Money.

At precisely 09:00 (local time) on 9 May, six US Navy A-7 Corsair IIs and three A-6 Intruders from the USS Coral Sea flew into Haiphong harbor and dropped thirty-six {{convert|1,000|lb|kg|adj=on}} Mark-52 and Mark-55 naval mines into its waters. They were protected from attacks by Vietnam People's Air Force (VPAF) MiG fighter aircraft by the guided-missile cruisers {{USS|Chicago|CA-136|2}} and {{USS|Long Beach|CGN-9|2}}, with several destroyers including the guided-missile destroyer {{USS|Berkeley|DDG-15|6}} launching Operation Custom Tailor and by supporting flights of F-4 Phantoms. The reason for the precise timing of the strike became apparent when Nixon simultaneously delivered a televised speech explaining the escalation to the American people: "The only way to stop the killing is to take the weapons of war out of the hands of the international outlaws of North Vietnam.".Morocco, p. 131. The mines were activated five days after their delivery to allow any vessels then in port to escape without damage. Over the next three days other US carrier-based aircraft laid 11,000 more mines into North Vietnam's secondary harbors, blockading all maritime commerce for the country.Andrade, p. 518.

Before and during Pocket Money, Nixon and Kissinger had worried about the Soviet and Chinese reaction to the escalation. Hours before Nixon's speech announcing the mining, Kissinger had delivered a letter to Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin which outlined the U.S. plan, but which also made clear Nixon's willingness to proceed with the summit.Fulghum and Maitland, pp. 170–171. The next day, Nixon shook the hand of Soviet Foreign Trade Minister Nikolai Patolichev at the White House. Although Moscow and Beijing publicly denounced the American operation, they were not willing to jeopardize their thawing relationship with the U.S. and Hanoi's requests for support and aid from its socialist allies met with only cool responses.

Operation Linebacker, the code name for the new interdiction campaign, would have four objectives: to isolate North Vietnam from its sources of supply by destroying railroad bridges and rolling stock in and around Hanoi and north-eastwards toward the Chinese frontier; the targeting of primary storage areas and marshalling yards; to destroy storage and transshipment points and to eliminate (or at least damage) the North's air defense system.William P. Head, War Above the Clouds, Maxwell AFB AL: Air University Press, 2002, p. 65. With nearly 85 percent of North Vietnam's imports (which arrived by sea) blocked by Pocket Money, the administration and the Pentagon believed that this would cut its final lines of communication with its socialist allies. China alone shipped an average of 22,000 tons of supplies a month over two rail lines and eight major roads that linked it with North Vietnam.

File:A-7E VA-195 bombing Hai Duong bridge 1972.jpg A-7E bombing the Hải Dương bridge, 10 May 1972]]

On 10 May Operation Linebacker began with mass bombing operations against North Vietnam by tactical fighter aircraft of the Seventh Air Force and Task Force 77. Their targets included the railroad switching yards at Yên Viên and the Paul Doumer Bridge, on the northern outskirts of Hanoi.Casey, Dougan and Lipsman, p. 39. A total of 414 sorties were flown on the first day of the operation, 120 by the Air Force and 294 by the Navy and they encountered the heaviest single day of air-to-air combat during the Vietnam War. The U.S claimed 11 VPAF MiGs (four MiG-21s and seven MiG-17s) and two Air Force F-4s shot down.Thompson, p. 236. The VPAF confirmed two MiG-21s, three MiG-17s and one MiG-19 shot down, and they claimed 7 F-4s were shot down (after the war, 5 F-4s shot down were confirmed{{cite news|url= http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_246.shtml|archive-url= https://archive.today/20120720192830/http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_246.shtml|url-status= usurped|archive-date= 20 July 2012|title=Vietnamese Air-to-Air Victories, Part 2|publisher= ACIG |access-date=14 November 2014}}) Anti-aircraft artillery and surface-to-air missile firings also brought down two USN aircraft (one of which was flown by aces Duke Cunningham and William P. Driscoll).

By the end of the month, American aircraft had destroyed 13 bridges along the rail lines running from Hanoi to the Chinese border. Another four were destroyed between the capital and Haiphong, including the notorious Thanh Hóa Bridge. Several more bridges were brought down along the rail line leading to the south toward the DMZ. Targets were then switched to petroleum and oil storage and transportation networks and North Vietnamese airfields.Tilford, p. 235. There was an immediate impact on the battlefield in South Vietnam. Shelling by PAVN artillery dropped off by one-half between 9 May and 1 June. This slowdown was not due to an immediate shortage of artillery shells, but rather to a desire to conserve ammunition. U.S. intelligence analysts believed that PAVN had enough stockpiled supplies to sustain their campaigns throughout the autumn.Andrade, p. 519.

The intensity of the bombing campaign was reflected by the sharp increase in the number of strike and support sorties flown in Southeast Asia as a whole: from 4,237 for all services, including the RVNAF, during the month preceding the invasion, to 27,745 flown in support of ARVN forces from the beginning of April to the end of June (20,506 of them flown by the Air Force).Head, p. 66. B-52s provided an additional 1,000 sorties during the same period. The North was feeling the pressure, admitting in the official PAVN history that "between May and June only 30 percent of supplies called for in our plan actually reached the front-line units."Van Thai & Van Quang 2002, p. 293. In total, 41,653 Linebacker missions dropped 155,548 tons of bombs.Clodfelter, p. 224.

In addition to interdicting the road and rail system of North Vietnam, Linebacker also systematically attacked its air defense system. The VPAF, with approximately 200 interceptors, strongly contested these attacks throughout the campaign. Navy pilots, employing a mutually supporting "loose deuce" tactical formation and many with TOPGUN training, claimed a kill ratio of 6:1 in their favor in May and June, such that after that the VPAF rarely engaged them thereafter.Morocco, p. 144. In contrast, the USAF experienced a 1:1 kill ratio through the first two months of the campaign, as seven of its eventual 24 Linebacker air-to-air losses occurred without any corresponding VPAF loss in a twelve-day period between 24 June and 5 July.Marshall L. Michel, Clashes: Air Combat Over North Vietnam 1965–1972. Annapolis MD: Naval Institute Press, 1997, p. 244. USAF pilots were hampered by use of the outdated "fluid four" tactical formations (a four-plane, two element formation in which only the leader did the shooting and in which the outside wingmen were vulnerable) dictated by service doctrine. Also contributing to the parity was a lack of air combat training against dissimilar aircraft, a deficient early warning system, and ECM pod formations that mandated strict adherence to formation flying.Michel, p. 288 During August the introduction of real-time early warning systems, increased aircrew combat experience and degraded VPAF ground control interception capabilities reversed the trend to a more favorable, with 4:1 kill ratio were claimed.Michel. p. 284

During the operation, each side would ultimately claim favourable kill ratios. A total of 201 air battles took place between American and Vietnamese planes in 1972 sorties. The VPAF lost 47 MiGs (including 26 MiG-21s, 5 MiG-19s and 16 MiG-17s ) and they claimed 90 U.S. aircraft were shot down, including 74 F-4 fighters and two RF-4C (MiG-21s shot down 67 enemy aircraft, MiG-17s shot down 11 and MiG-19s shot down 12 enemy aircraft{{cite web | url=http://vietnam.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/mig21_history_vietnam.html | title=Vietnam Conflict Aviation Resource Center - A Warbirds Resource Group Site }}

Linebacker saw several other "firsts". On the opening day of the operation, USN Lieutenant Duke Cunningham and his radar intercept officer, Lieutenant (j.g.) William P. Driscoll became the first U.S. air aces of the Vietnam War when they shot down their fifth MiG.Morocco, p. 145. On 28 August, the USAF gained its first ace when Captain Richard S. Ritchie downed his fifth enemy aircraft. Twelve days later, Captain Charles B. DeBellevue (who had been Ritchie's backseater during four of his five victories) downed two more MiGs, bringing his total to six. On 13 October another weapons officer, Captain Jeffrey S. Feinstein, was credited with his fifth MiG, making him the final Air Force ace.

Although Linebacker was largely carried out by air, naval forces were also deployed to provide counter-battery fire against enemy targets along the coast and other important logistical areas and in support of ground troops. One such operation was Operation Lion's Den, or "The Battle of Haiphong Harbor". On 27 August 1972, Vice Admiral James L. Holloway III took with him his ship, the heavy cruiser {{USS|Newport News|CA-148|6}}, the guided missile cruiser {{USS|Providence|CLG-6|6}}, and the destroyers {{USS|Robison|DDG-12|6}} and {{USS|Rowan|DD-782|6}} conducted a brief night raid against the North Vietnamese forces protecting the port of Haiphong. After the bombardment, the ships were threatened by four Soviet-built torpedo boats. Joined by two aircraft from the USS Coral Sea, three of the four torpedo boats were sunk. It was one of the few ship-to-ship naval battles of the war.Holloway, James L. (2007). Aircraft Carriers at War: A Personal Retrospective of Korea, Vietnam, and the Soviet Confrontation. US Naval Institute Press. {{ISBN|1-59114-391-8}}, p. 308{{cite book|last=Sherwood|first=John|title=Nixon's Trident: Naval Power in Southeast Asia, 1968–1972|publisher=Naval Historical Center|year=2009|url=https://www.history.navy.mil/research/publications/publications-by-subject/nixons-trident.html|isbn=9781505469127|pages=68–9}}{{PD-notice}}

{{Further|topic=the negotiations|Paris Peace Talks}}

The stalled offensive in the South and the devastation in North Vietnam had helped to convince Hanoi to return to the bargaining table by early August. The meetings produced new concessions from Hanoi which promised to end the deadlock that had plagued negotiations since their inception in 1968. Gone were Hanoi's demands for the ouster of South Vietnamese President Nguyễn Văn Thiệu and his replacement by a coalition government in which the Viet Cong would participate.Lipsman and Weiss, p. 9. See also Karnow, p. 647. The U.S. on its part agreed to a cease fire in place which conceded that PAVN soldiers could remain in South Vietnam after a peace agreement.{{cite web|title=Memoirs v Tapes: President Nixon and the December Bombings|url=http://www.nixonlibrary.gov/exhibits/decbomb/chapter-ii.html|access-date=23 June 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180712134415/http://www.nixonlibrary.gov/exhibits/decbomb/chapter-ii.html|archive-date=12 July 2018|url-status=dead}} The diplomatic impasse was broken and Nixon ordered a halt to all bombing above the 20th parallel on 23 October and on 26 October Kissinger announced that "peace is at hand." This once again placed Hanoi and Haiphong off-limits, and halted Linebacker operations.

Air Force historian Earl Tilford has written that Linebacker was "a watershed in aerial warfare...it was the first modern aerial campaign in which precision guided munitions changed the way in which air power was used."Tilford, p. 238. It succeeded, where Rolling Thunder had failed, he claimed, for three reasons: Nixon was decisive in his actions and gave the military greater latitude in targeting; American airpower was forcefully and appropriately used; and the immense difference in the technology utilized made Linebacker the first bombing campaign in a "new era" of aerial warfare.Tilford, pp. 238–240.

During and immediately following the PAVN offensive, U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps aviators had flown 18,000 sorties in the four northern provinces of South Vietnam and dropped 40,000 tons of ordnance in the Battle of An Lộc. Between March and May, B-52 sortie rates had climbed from 700 to 2,200 per month and they had dropped 57,000 tons of bombs in Quảng Trị Province alone.Lavalle, p. 103. During Freedom Train and Linebacker proper, B-52s had dropped 150,237 tons of bombs on the North while Air Force and Navy tactical aircraft had flown 1,216 sorties and dropped another 5,000 tons of ordnance.Head, p. 71.

From the beginning of Freedom Train in April to the end of June 1972 the United States lost 52 aircraft over North Vietnam: 17 to missiles; 11 to anti-aircraft weapons; three to small arms fire; 14 to MiGs; and seven to unknown causes.Head, p. 66. One of those aircraft was an EB-66 electronic jamming aircraft with the call sign Bat-21. The EB-66 was shot down over northern South Vietnam on 2 April with only one survivor, Lieutenant Colonel Iceal Hambleton. See Lavalle, pp. 35–43. During the same time period, the RVNAF lost ten aircraft.Tilford, pp. 231, 251. Linebacker. See also Lavalle, p. 107. 63 VPAF aircraft were destroyed during the same time period.Tilford, p. 245. North Vietnam claimed that it had shot down 651 aircraft and sunk or set on fire 80 U.S. warships during the operation.

Linebacker had played a crucial role in blunting the northern offensive by drying up its vital sources of supply. PAVN had evolved into a conventional military force, and such a force depended upon a complex logistical system, which made it vulnerable to aerial attack.Palmer, p. 322. By September, imports into North Vietnam were estimated at 35 to 50 percent below what they had been in May, bolstering claims that the campaign had been successful in its interdiction effort.Tilford, p. 237. USAF General Robert N. Ginsburgh, of the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, summed up the attitudes of U.S. commanders by remarking that Linebacker had "a greater impact in its first four months of operation than Rolling Thunder had in three and one-half years."Morocco, p. 136. Although Kissinger may have announced that peace was at hand, it was not going to come easily. American bombers would once again return to the skies of North Vietnam in 1972 during Operation Linebacker II before the American commitment to the Vietnam War came to an end.Boyne, Linebacker II.

(Air-to-air losses only, claimed by the U.S){{cite web| url =https://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/fulltext/aces_aerial_victories.pdf| title =United States Air Force in Southeast Asia: Aces and Aerial Victories – 1965–1973| publisher =Air University| access-date =15 February 2007| url-status =dead| archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20061105053444/https://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/fulltext/aces_aerial_victories.pdf| archive-date =5 November 2006}}, on-line book, pp. 95–102.

{{cite book| author=Drendel, Lou.| title=...And Kill MiGs| publisher=Squadron/Signal Publications| isbn= 978-0-89747-056-8| year=1984}}

According to the VPAF, they lost 47 MiGs in aircombat (including 26 MiG-21s, 5 MiG-19s and 16 MiG-17s){{Cite web|url=http://old.vko.ru/pictures/2006_26/42_01.jpg|title=Wayback Machine|website=old.vko.ru}}

Between 10 May and 23 October 1972, the United States lost a total of 134 aircraft either over the north or as a direct result of Linebacker missions. 104 were lost in combat and 30 were destroyed in operational accidents. Losses by service were:

USAF: – 70 total

• 51 combat losses (22 to MiGs, 5 induced losses,Michel, p. 317 note 2. An "induced loss" occurred when a MiG was credited with indirectly causing a U.S. aircraft loss, including fuel exhaustion, fratricide, and loss of control while maneuvering. 20 to AAA, 4 to SAMs)
• 43 F-4D/E Phantom II (+17 non-combat losses)
• 2 RF-4C Photo Recon (+1 non-combat loss)
• 4 F-105G Wild Weasel (+1 non-combat loss)
• 2 F-111A "Aardvark"

USN: – 54 total

• 43 combat losses (4 to MiGs, 2 induced, 13 SAM, 27 AAA)
• 8 F-4B/J Phantom II (+3 non-combat losses)
• 22 A-7A/C/E Corsair II (+3 non-combat losses)
• 3 A-6A Intruder
• 2 F-8J Crusader (+3 non-combat losses)
• 5 A-4F Skyhawk (+1 non-combat loss)
• 1 RA-5C Vigilante
• 2 RF-8G Photo Crusader (+1 non-combat loss)

USMC: – 10 total

• 10 combat losses (1 MiG, 1 SAM, 8 AAA)
• 4 F-4J Phantom II
• 2 A-4E Skyhawk
• 4 A-6A Intruder

• USS Kitty Hawk riot

{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

• {{cite journal|last=Boyne|first=Walter J.|author-link=Walter J. Boyne|url=http://www.airforce-magazine.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/1997/November%201997/1197linebacker.aspx|title=Linebacker II|journal=Air Force Magazine|volume=80|issue=11|date=May 1997|issn=0730-6784|access-date=3 January 2016|archive-date=24 December 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121224011210/http://www.airforce-magazine.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/1997/November%201997/1197linebacker.aspx|url-status=usurped}}
• {{cite book|last=Head|first=William P.|title=War from Above the Clouds: B-52 Operations During the Second Indochina War and the Effects of the Air War on Theory and Doctrine|url=http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil/digital/pdf/paper/fp_0007_head_war_from_above_clouds.pdf|location=Maxwell AFB, Alabama|publisher=Air University Press|year=2002|oclc=54838431|access-date=1 January 2016|archive-date=10 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161110122420/http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil/digital/pdf/paper/fp_0007_head_war_from_above_clouds.pdf|url-status=dead}}
• {{cite book|editor-last=Lavalle|editor-first=A.J.C.|title=Airpower and the 1972 Spring Offensive|location=Maxwell AFB, Alabama|publisher=Air University Press|year=1976|url=http://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/fulltext/spring_invasion_1972.pdf|oclc=263557387|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110609012636/http://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/fulltext/spring_invasion_1972.pdf|archive-date=9 June 2011}}
• {{cite book|last=Nalty|first=Bernard C.|title=Air War Over South Vietnam: 1969–1975|location=Washington DC|publisher=Center of Air Force History|year=1995|isbn=9780160509148}}
• {{cite book|last=Nicholson|first=Charles A.|title=Project CHECO Southeast Asia Report. The USAF Response to the Spring 1972 NVN Offensive: Situation and Redeployment|url=https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a486927.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191115222249/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a486927.pdf|url-status=live|archive-date=15 November 2019|publisher=HQ PACAF, Directorate of Operations Analysis, CHECO/CORONA Harvest Division |year=1972}}
• {{cite journal |last1=Picinich |first1=A.A., Colonel |editor1-last=Radzykewycz |editor1-first=D.T., Captain |title=The F-111 In Southeast Asia September 1972 – January 1973 |journal=CHECO/CORONA HARVEST Division, DCS/Plans and Operations, HQ PACAF |date=21 February 1974 |volume=Project CHECO Report |issue=Special Project |publisher=Department of the Air Force |location=Hq USAF |language=en |id=UNCLASSIFIED}}
• {{cite book|last=Schlight|first=John|title=A War Too Long|url=https://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/fulltext/a_war_too_long.pdf|location=Washington DC|publisher=Center of Air Force History|year=1993|oclc=464220328|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070705113957/https://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/fulltext/a_war_too_long.pdf|archive-date=5 July 2007}}
• {{cite book|last=Thompson|first=Wayne|title=To Hanoi and Back: The U.S. Air Force and North Vietnam, 1966–1973|location=Washington DC|publisher=Smithsonian Institution Press|year=2002|isbn=9781560988779}}
• {{cite book|last=Tilford|first=Earl H.|title=Setup: What the Air Force Did in Vietnam and Why|location=Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama|publisher=Air University Press|year=1991|isbn=9781429458276}}
• {{cite book|editor1-last=Van Thai|editor1-first=Hoang|editor2-last=Van Quang|editor2-first=Tran|title=Victory in Vietnam: The Official History of the People's Army of Vietnam, 1954–1975, translated by Merle L. Pribbenow|publisher=University Press of Kansas|location=Lawrence, Kansas|orig-year=1988 |year=2002|edition=English|isbn=978-0-7006-1175-1}}

• {{cite book|last=Andrade|first=Dale|title=Trial by Fire: The 1972 Easter Offensive, America's Last Vietnam Battle|location=New York|publisher=Hippocrene Books|year=1995|isbn=9780781802864|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/trialbyfire1972e0000andr}}
• {{cite book|last1=Casey|first1=Michael|first2=Clark|last2=Dougan|first3=Samuel|last3=Lipsman|first4=Jack|last4=Sweetman|first5=Stephen|last5=Weiss|title=Flags into Battle|url=https://archive.org/details/flagsintobattle00case|url-access=registration|location=Boston, Massachusetts|publisher=Boston Publishing Company|year=1987|isbn=9780201116762}}
• {{cite book|last=Clodfelter|first=Micheal|title=Vietnam in Military Statistics: A History of the Indochina Wars, 1772–1991|publisher=McFarland & Company|location=Jefferson, North Carolina|year=1995|isbn=978-0786400270}}
• {{cite book|last=Davies|first=Peter E.|title=US Marine Corps F-4 Phantom II Units of the Vietnam War|publisher=Osprey Publishing|location=Midland House, West Way, Botley, Oxford|year=2012|isbn=978-1849087513}}
• {{cite book|last=Drendel|first=Lou|title=Air War over Southeast Asia: Volume 3, 1971–1975|location=Carrollton, Texas|publisher=Squadron/Signal Publications|year=1984|isbn=9780897471480|url=https://archive.org/details/airwaroversouthe00loud}}
• {{cite journal |last1=Drenkowski |first1=Dana |last2=Grau |first2=Lester W. |title=Patterns and Predictability: The Soviet Evaluation of Operation Linebacker II |journal=Journal of Slavic Military Studies |date=December 2007 |volume=20 |issue=4 |pages=559–607 |doi=10.1080/13518040701703096 |s2cid=143833568 |url=http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/Patterns-and-Predictability.pdf |access-date=16 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314113417/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/Patterns-and-Predictability.pdf |archive-date=14 March 2016 |url-status=dead}}
• {{cite book|last=Francillion|first=Rene J.|title=Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club: U.S. Carrier Operations off Vietnam|publisher=Naval Institute Press|location=Annapolis, Maryland|year=1988|isbn=978-0870216961}}
• {{cite book|last1=Fulghum|first1=David|first2=Terrence|last2=Maitland|title=South Vietnam on Trial: Mid-1970–1972|location=Boston, Massachusetts|publisher=Boston Publishing Company|year=1984|isbn=9780939526109}}
• {{cite book|last=Karnow|first=Stanley|title=Vietnam: A History|location=New York|publisher=Viking Books|year=1983|isbn=9780670746040|url=https://archive.org/details/vietnamhistory00karn}}
• {{cite book|last1=Lipsman|first1=Samuel|first2=Stephen|last2=Weiss|title=The False Peace: 1972–74|location=Boston, Massachusetts|publisher=Boston Publishing Company|year=1985|isbn=9780201112726|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/falsepeace1972740000lips}}
• {{cite book|last1=Littauer|first1=Raphael|first2=Norman|last2=Uphoff|title=The Air War in Indochina|location=Boston, Massachusetts|publisher=Beacon Press|year=1972|isbn=9780807002490}}
• {{cite book|last1=Mersky|first1=Peter|title=US Navy and Marine Corps A-4 Skyhawk Units of the Vietnam War 1963–1973 (Combat Aircraft)|location= Midland House, West Way, Botley, Oxford|year=2007|isbn=978-1846031816}}
• {{cite book|last=Michel III|first=Marshall L.|title=Clashes, Air Combat Over North Vietnam 1965–1972|year=1997|publisher=Naval Institute Press|location=Annapolis, Maryland|isbn=9781591145196}}
• {{cite book|last=Morocco|first=John|title=Rain of Fire: Air War, 1969–1973|location=Boston, Massachusetts|publisher=Boston Publishing Company|year=1985|isbn=9780939526147|url=https://archive.org/details/rainoffire00time}}
• {{cite book|last=Palmer|first=Dave Richard|title=Summons of the Trumpet: The History of the Vietnam War from a Military Man's Viewpoint|location=New York|publisher=Ballantine|year=1978|isbn=9780891410416|url=https://archive.org/details/summonsoftrumpet00palm}}
• {{cite book|last=Randolph|first=Stephen P.|title=Powerful and Brutal Weapons: Nixon, Kissinger, and the Easter Offensive|location=Cambridge|publisher=Harvard University Press|year=2007|isbn=9780674024915|url=https://archive.org/details/powerfulbrutalwe0000rand}}
• {{cite magazine|last=Smith|first=John T.|title=Day of the Top Guns, May 10, 1972|magazine=Air Enthusiast|date=March–May 1992|issue=45 |pages=13–23 |issn=0143-5450}}

{{Commons category|Operation Linebacker I/II}}

• [http://www.clemson.edu/caah/history/facultypages/EdMoise/airwar.html#line Bibliography: Operations Linebacker and Linebacker II]

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Linebacker, Operation}}

Category:Aerial operations and battles of the Vietnam War

Category:Battles and operations of the Vietnam War in 1972

Category:Campaigns of the Vietnam War

Category:Military campaigns involving the United States

Category:Military campaigns involving Vietnam

Category:Strategic bombing conducted by the United States

Category:Strategic bombing operations and battles

Category:United States Marine Corps in the Vietnam War