Oregon Ballot Measure 116
{{Short description|none}}
{{Infobox referendum
| name = Ballot Measure 116
| title = Independent Public Service Compensation Commission Amendment: Establishes “Independent Public Service Compensation Commission” to determine salaries for specified officials; eliminates legislative authority to set such salaries.
| country = Oregon
| yes = 981715
| no = 1083451
| invalid =
| total =
| map = File:2024 Oregon ballot measure 116 results map by county.svg
| mapcaption = {{col-begin}}
{{col-2}}
No
{{legend|#8B8B54|70-80%}}
{{legend|#BCBC83|60-70%}}
{{legend|#DEDEBD|50-60%}}
{{col-2}}
Yes
{{legend|#B6C8D9|50-60%}}
{{col-end}}
| notes =
}}
Oregon Ballot Measure 116, the Independent Public Service Compensation Commission Amendment, was a proposed amendment to the Constitution of Oregon that was decided by voters as part of the 2024 Oregon elections on November 5, 2024.{{cite web|url=https://www.koin.com/news/elections/oregon-voters-to-decide-on-5-ballot-measures-in-2024-november-election/|title=Oregon voters to decide on 5 ballot measures in 2024 November election|date=August 2, 2024|first=Michaela|last=Bourgeois|work=KOIN|accessdate=October 28, 2024}}{{cite web|url=https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/election-preview/|title=Election 2024: Your guide to Oregon’s November election|date=October 13, 2024|first=Carlos|last=Fuentes|work=The Oregonian|accessdate=October 28, 2024}} If approved, it would have established an "Independent Public Service Compensation Commission", which would determine salaries for politicians and other government figures in the state.{{Cite web |date=2024-10-17 |title=Measure 116 would change who sets salaries for state elected officials - Oregon Center for Public Policy |url=https://www.ocpp.org/2024/10/17/measure-116-would-change-who-sets-salaries-for-state-elected-officials/ |access-date=2024-10-28 |language=en-US}}
Positions for and against
Newspaper editorials have pointed out that the Commission would not be independent from the Oregon Legislature, which would later determine who would get appointed to the Commission and how it would operate. The Oregonian editorial board stated in its opposition:
Legislators and measure supporters are painting this measure as a way to put the power in the hands of the people and prevent “politicians from meddling in the process,” when it actually takes away accountability to the public.{{Cite web |last=Board |first=The Oregonian Editorial |date=2024-09-29 |title=Editorial endorsement November 2024: Vote ‘no’ on Measure 116, the Legislature’s accountability dodge |url=https://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/2024/09/editorial-endorsement-november-2024-vote-no-on-measure-116-the-legislatures-accountability-dodge.html |access-date=2024-10-29 |website=oregonlive |language=en}}Willamette Week editorialized:
Currently, as is the case in 30 other states, legislators have the authority to set their own salaries. Although they have long grumbled about low pay and their workload has increased, lawmakers have lacked the political courage to tackle the issue for themselves.In a hurried process in 2023, lawmakers proposed enshrining in the constitution a salary commission, which would set salaries for statewide elected officials, judges, district attorneys—and lawmakers.
There is no requirement, however, that the commission be bipartisan or nonpartisan, and there are few limits on whom the Legislature can appoint to that commission: state employees, lobbyists and officials’ family members are barred, but everybody else, including donors and political consultants, is eligible.
But the biggest red flag: Unlike virtually any other action a government body might take, no review or appeal of the salary commission’s decisions is allowed, according to the measure’s official explanatory statement: “Determinations of the commission would not be subject to review or modification by the Legislative Assembly, the governor or any other official.”
That’s bad governance. Vote no.{{Cite web |date=2024-10-16 |title=WW’s Fall 2024 Endorsements: Ballot Measures |url=https://www.wweek.com/news/2024/10/16/wws-fall-2024-endorsements-ballot-measures/ |access-date=2024-10-29 |website=Willamette Week |language=en}}
Polling
| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
!Poll source !Date(s) administered !Sample size{{efn|Key: !Margin of error !For Measure 116 !Against Measure 116 !Undecided |
| style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling (D){{Cite web|url=https://www.nwprogressive.org/weblog/2024/10/oregon-voters-split-on-ranked-choice-voting-initiative-while-poised-to-reject-rebate-plan-and-accept-constitutional-changes.html|title=Oregon voters are split on ranked choice voting initiative, while poised to reject rebate plan and accept constitutional changes|first=Andrew|last=Villeneuve|website=Northwest Progressive Institute|date=October 24, 2024|accessdate=November 3, 2024}}{{efn|This poll was sponsored by the Northwest Progressive Institute}}
|data-sort-value="2024-10-17"|October 16–17, 2024 |716 (LV) |± 3.7% |style="background: rgb(153, 255, 153);"|49% |26% |25% |
{{Reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
See also
References
{{reflist}}
{{Oregon-election-stub}}
{{2024 United States elections}}