Planck constant#Reduced%20Planck%20constant

{{Main|Planck's law}}

File:Max Planck Wirkungsquantums 20050815.jpg: "In this edifice taught Max Planck, the discoverer of the elementary quantum of action h, from 1889 to 1928."]]

File:Wiens law.svg. Each curve represents behavior at different body temperatures. The Planck constant h is used to explain the shape of these curves.]]

The Planck constant was formulated as part of Max Planck's successful effort to produce a mathematical expression that accurately predicted the observed spectral distribution of black-body radiation.{{cite book |last1=Bitter |first1=Francis |title=Fields and particles |last2=Medicus |first2=Heinrich A. |date=1973 |publisher=Elsevier |location=New York |pages=137–144 |author-link=Francis Bitter}} This expression is now known as Planck's law.

In the last years of the 19th century, Max Planck was investigating the problem of black-body radiation first posed by Kirchhoff some 40 years earlier. Every physical body spontaneously and continuously emits electromagnetic radiation. There was no expression or explanation for the overall shape of the observed emission spectrum. At the time, Wien's law fit the data for short wavelengths and high temperatures, but failed for long wavelengths.{{rp|141}} Also around this time, but unknown to Planck, Lord Rayleigh had derived theoretically a formula, now known as the Rayleigh–Jeans law, that could reasonably predict long wavelengths but failed dramatically at short wavelengths.

Approaching this problem, Planck hypothesized that the equations of motion for light describe a set of harmonic oscillators, one for each possible frequency. He examined how the entropy of the oscillators varied with the temperature of the body, trying to match Wien's law, and was able to derive an approximate mathematical function for the black-body spectrum,{{citation | first = Max | last = Planck | author-link = Max Planck | title = Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum |language=de | url = http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/annalen/history/historic-papers/1901_309_553-563.pdf | journal = Annalen der Physik | year = 1901 | volume = 309 | issue = 3 | pages = 553–63 | doi = 10.1002/andp.19013090310 | bibcode = 1901AnP...309..553P | doi-access = free | access-date = 2008-12-15 | archive-date = 2012-06-10 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120610124128/http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/annalen/history/historic-papers/1901_309_553-563.pdf | url-status = live }}. English translations:

• {{Cite web |title=On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum |url=http://dbhs.wvusd.k12.ca.us/webdocs/Chem-History/Planck-1901/Planck-1901.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080418002757/http://dbhs.wvusd.k12.ca.us/webdocs/Chem-History/Planck-1901/Planck-1901.html |archive-date=2008-04-18}}
• {{cite web |url=http://theochem.kuchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp/Ando/planck1901.pdf |title=On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum |access-date=2011-10-13 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111006162543/http://theochem.kuchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp/Ando/planck1901.pdf |archive-date=2011-10-06 }} which gave a simple empirical formula for long wavelengths.

Planck tried to find a mathematical expression that could reproduce Wien's law (for short wavelengths) and the empirical formula (for long wavelengths). This expression included a constant, $h$, which is thought to be for {{lang|de|Hilfsgröße}} (auxiliary quantity),{{Cite arXiv |eprint=physics/0402064v1 |first=Luis J. |last=Boya |title=The Thermal Radiation Formula of Planck (1900) |date=2004}} and subsequently became known as the Planck constant. The expression formulated by Planck showed that the spectral radiance per unit frequency of a body for frequency {{math|ν}} at absolute temperature {{math|T}} is given by

$$B\_\backslash nu(\backslash nu,\; T)\; d\backslash nu=\; \backslash frac\{\; 2\; h\; \backslash nu^3\}\{c^2\}\; \backslash frac\{1\}\{e^\backslash frac\{h\backslash nu\}\{k\_\backslash mathrm\; B\; T\}\; -\; 1\}d\backslash nu\; ,$$

where $k\_\backslash text\{B\}$ is the Boltzmann constant, $h$ is the Planck constant, and $c$ is the speed of light in the medium, whether material or vacuum.{{Cite book |last=Planck |first=M. |url=https://archive.org/details/theoryofheatradi00planrich |title=The Theory of Heat Radiation |publisher=P. Blakiston's Son |translator-last=Masius |translator-first=M. |year=1914 |edition=2nd |pages=6, 168 |ol=7154661M |author-link=Max Planck}}{{cite book |last=Chandrasekhar |first=S. |url=https://archive.org/details/radiativetransfe0000chan |title=Radiative Transfer |publisher=Dover |year=1960 |isbn=978-0-486-60590-6 |edition=revised reprint |page=8 |author-link=Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar |url-access=registration |orig-year=1950}}{{cite book |last1=Rybicki |first1=G. B. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LtdEjNABMlsC |title=Radiative Processes in Astrophysics |last2=Lightman |first2=A. P. |publisher=Wiley |year=1979 |isbn=978-0-471-82759-7 |page=22 |author-link2=Alan Lightman |access-date=2020-05-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727111701/https://books.google.com/books?id=LtdEjNABMlsC |archive-date=2020-07-27 |url-status=live}}

Planck soon realized that his solution was not unique. There were several different solutions, each of which gave a different value for the entropy of the oscillators. To save his theory, Planck resorted to using the then-controversial theory of statistical mechanics, which he described as "an act of desperation".{{citation |last=Kragh |first=Helge |title=Max Planck: the reluctant revolutionary |date=1 December 2000 |url=https://physicsworld.com/a/max-planck-the-reluctant-revolutionary/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090108204645/http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/373 |publisher=PhysicsWorld.com |archive-date=2009-01-08 |author-link=Helge Kragh}} One of his new boundary conditions was

{{blockquote|text=to interpret U_N ['the vibrational energy of N oscillators'] not as a continuous, infinitely divisible quantity, but as a discrete quantity composed of an integral number of finite equal parts. Let us call each such part the energy element ε;|sign=Planck|source="On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum"}}

With this new condition, Planck had imposed the quantization of the energy of the oscillators, in his own words, "a purely formal assumption ... actually I did not think much about it",{{citation |last=Kragh |first=Helge |title=Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ELrFDIldlawC |page=62 |year=1999 |access-date=2021-10-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211206180414/https://books.google.com/books?id=ELrFDIldlawC |url-status=live |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-09552-3 |archive-date=2021-12-06}} but one that would revolutionize physics. Applying this new approach to Wien's displacement law showed that the "energy element" must be proportional to the frequency of the oscillator, the first version of what is now sometimes termed the Planck–Einstein relation:

$$E\; =\; hf.$$

Planck was able to calculate the value of $h$ from experimental data on black-body radiation: his result, {{val|6.55|e=-34|u=J.s}}, is within 1.2% of the currently defined value. He also made the first determination of the Boltzmann constant $k\_\backslash text\{B\}$ from the same data and theory.{{citation |last=Planck |first=Max |title=The Genesis and Present State of Development of the Quantum Theory (Nobel Lecture) |date=2 June 1920 |url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1918/planck-lecture.html |access-date=13 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110715190331/http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1918/planck-lecture.html |url-status=live |archive-date=15 July 2011 |author-link=Max Planck}}

File:Black body.svg

The black-body problem was revisited in 1905, when Lord Rayleigh and James Jeans (together) and Albert Einstein independently proved that classical electromagnetism could never account for the observed spectrum. These proofs are commonly known as the "ultraviolet catastrophe", a name coined by Paul Ehrenfest in 1911. They contributed greatly (along with Einstein's work on the photoelectric effect) in convincing physicists that Planck's postulate of quantized energy levels was more than a mere mathematical formalism. The first Solvay Conference in 1911 was devoted to "the theory of radiation and quanta".{{Citation |title=Previous Solvay Conferences on Physics |url=http://www.solvayinstitutes.be/Conseils%20Solvay/PreviousPhysics.html |access-date=12 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081216120021/http://www.solvayinstitutes.be/Conseils%20Solvay/PreviousPhysics.html |url-status=dead |publisher=International Solvay Institutes |archive-date=16 December 2008}}

{{Main|Photoelectric effect}}

The photoelectric effect is the emission of electrons (called "photoelectrons") from a surface when light is shone on it. It was first observed by Alexandre Edmond Becquerel in 1839, although credit is usually reserved for Heinrich Hertz,See, e.g., {{cite web |last=Arrhenius |first=Svante |title=Presentation speech of the 1921 Nobel Prize for Physics |date=10 December 1922 |url=https://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/press.html |access-date=13 December 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110904232203/http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/press.html |url-status=live |archive-date=4 September 2011 |author-link=Svante Arrhenius}} who published the first thorough investigation in 1887. Another particularly thorough investigation was published by Philipp Lenard (Lénárd Fülöp) in 1902.{{cite journal |last=Lenard |first=P. |title=Ueber die lichtelektrische Wirkung |url=https://zenodo.org/record/1424009 |journal=Annalen der Physik |volume=313 |issue=5 |pages=149–198 |year=1902 |access-date=2019-07-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190818204108/https://zenodo.org/record/1424009 |url-status=live |bibcode=1902AnP...313..149L |doi=10.1002/andp.19023130510 |archive-date=2019-08-18 |author-link=Philipp Lenard}} Einstein's 1905 paper{{cite journal |last=Einstein |first=Albert |title=Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt |url=http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/annalen/history/einstein-papers/1905_17_132-148.pdf |journal=Annalen der Physik |volume=17 |issue=6 |pages=132–48 |year=1905 |access-date=2009-12-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110709180735/http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/annalen/history/einstein-papers/1905_17_132-148.pdf |url-status=live |bibcode=1905AnP...322..132E |doi=10.1002/andp.19053220607 |archive-date=2011-07-09 |author-link=Albert Einstein |doi-access=free}} discussing the effect in terms of light quanta would earn him the Nobel Prize in 1921, after his predictions had been confirmed by the experimental work of Robert Andrews Millikan.{{cite journal |last=Millikan |first=R. A. |title=A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck's h |journal=Physical Review |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=355–88 |year=1916 |bibcode=1916PhRv....7..355M |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.7.355 |author-link=Robert Andrews Millikan |doi-access=free}} The Nobel committee awarded the prize for his work on the photo-electric effect, rather than relativity, both because of a bias against purely theoretical physics not grounded in discovery or experiment, and dissent amongst its members as to the actual proof that relativity was real.{{cite book |last=Isaacson |first=Walter |title=Einstein: His Life and Universe |date=2007-04-10 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cdxWNE7NY6QC |access-date=2021-10-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200109170326/https://books.google.com/books?id=cdxWNE7NY6QC |url-status=live |isbn=978-1-4165-3932-2 |archive-date=2020-01-09 |pages=309–314}}{{Cite web |title=The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921 |url=https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180703190346/https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/ |archive-date=2018-07-03 |access-date=2014-04-23 |publisher=Nobel Foundation}}

Before Einstein's paper, electromagnetic radiation such as visible light was considered to behave as a wave: hence the use of the terms "frequency" and "wavelength" to characterize different types of radiation. The energy transferred by a wave in a given time is called its intensity. The light from a theatre spotlight is more intense than the light from a domestic lightbulb; that is to say that the spotlight gives out more energy per unit time and per unit space (and hence consumes more electricity) than the ordinary bulb, even though the color of the light might be very similar. Other waves, such as sound or the waves crashing against a seafront, also have their intensity. However, the energy account of the photoelectric effect did not seem to agree with the wave description of light.

The "photoelectrons" emitted as a result of the photoelectric effect have a certain kinetic energy, which can be measured. This kinetic energy (for each photoelectron) is independent of the intensity of the light, but depends linearly on the frequency; and if the frequency is too low (corresponding to a photon energy that is less than the work function of the material), no photoelectrons are emitted at all, unless a plurality of photons, whose energetic sum is greater than the energy of the photoelectrons, acts virtually simultaneously (multiphoton effect).{{Cite journal |last=Smith |first=Richard |year=1962 |title=Two Photon Photoelectric Effect |journal=Physical Review |volume=128 |issue=5 |page=2225 |bibcode=1962PhRv..128.2225S |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.128.2225}}{{cite journal|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.130.2599.4|title=Two-Photon Photoelectric Effect|year=1963|last1=Smith|first1=Richard|journal=Physical Review|volume=130|issue=6|page=2599|bibcode = 1963PhRv..130.2599S |doi-access=free}} Assuming the frequency is high enough to cause the photoelectric effect, a rise in intensity of the light source causes more photoelectrons to be emitted with the same kinetic energy, rather than the same number of photoelectrons to be emitted with higher kinetic energy.

Einstein's explanation for these observations was that light itself is quantized; that the energy of light is not transferred continuously as in a classical wave, but only in small "packets" or quanta. The size of these "packets" of energy, which would later be named photons, was to be the same as Planck's "energy element", giving the modern version of the Planck–Einstein relation:

$$E\; =\; hf\; .$$

Einstein's postulate was later proven experimentally: the constant of proportionality between the frequency of incident light $f$ and the kinetic energy of photoelectrons $E$ was shown to be equal to the Planck constant $h$.

{{Main|Bohr model}}

File:Bohr atom model.svg

In 1912 John William Nicholson developed{{cite journal |doi=10.1093/mnras/72.8.677 |title=The Constitution of the Solar Corona II |year=1912 |last1=Nicholson |first1=J. W. |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=72 |issue=8 |pages=677–693 |doi-access=free }} an atomic model and found the angular momentum of the electrons in the model were related by h/2{{pi}}.

{{Cite journal |last=Heilbron |first=John L. |year=2013 |title=The path to the quantum atom |journal=Nature |volume=498 |issue=7452 |pages=27–30 |doi=10.1038/498027a |pmid=23739408 |s2cid=4355108}}{{Cite journal |last=McCormmach |first=Russell |year=1966 |title=The Atomic Theory of John William Nicholson |journal=Archive for History of Exact Sciences |volume=3 |issue=2 |pages=160–184 |doi=10.1007/BF00357268 |jstor=41133258 |s2cid=120797894}}

Nicholson's nuclear quantum atomic model influenced the development of Niels Bohr 's atomic model{{Cite journal |last1=Hirosige |first1=Tetu |last2=Nisio |first2=Sigeko |year=1964 |title=Formation of Bohr's theory of atomic constitution |journal=Japanese Studies in History of Science |volume=3 |pages=6–28}}{{cite thesis |first=J. L. |last=Heilbron |title=A History of Atomic Models from the Discovery of the Electron to the Beginnings of Quantum Mechanics |degree=PhD |publisher=University of California, Berkeley |year=1964}} and Bohr quoted him in his 1913 paper of the Bohr model of the atom.{{Cite journal |last=Bohr |first=Neils |year=1913 |title=On the constitution of atoms and molecules |url=https://zenodo.org/record/2493915 |url-status=live |journal=The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science |series=6th series |volume=26 |issue=151 |pages=1–25 |bibcode=1913PMag...26..476B |doi=10.1080/14786441308634955 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230307022713/https://zenodo.org/record/2493915 |archive-date=2023-03-07 |access-date=2023-07-23}} Bohr's model went beyond Planck's abstract harmonic oscillator concept: an electron in a Bohr atom could only have certain defined energies $E\_n$, defined by

$$E\_n\; =\; -\backslash frac\{h\; c\; R\_\{\backslash infty\}\}\{n^2\}\; ,$$

where $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum, $R\_\{\backslash infty\}$ is an experimentally determined constant (the Rydberg constant) and $n\; \backslash in\; \backslash \{1,\; 2,\; 3,\; ...\; \backslash \}$. This approach also allowed Bohr to account for the Rydberg formula, an empirical description of the atomic spectrum of hydrogen, and to account for the value of the Rydberg constant $R\_\{\backslash infty\}$ in terms of other fundamental constants.

In discussing angular momentum of the electrons in his model Bohr introduced the quantity $\backslash frac\{h\}\{2\backslash pi\}$, now known as the reduced Planck constant as the quantum of angular momentum.

{{Main|Uncertainty principle}}

The Planck constant also occurs in statements of Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Given numerous particles prepared in the same state, the uncertainty in their position, $\backslash Delta\; x$, and the uncertainty in their momentum, $\backslash Delta\; p\_\{x\}$, obey

$$\backslash Delta\; x\backslash ,\; \backslash Delta\; p\_\{x\}\; \backslash ge\; \backslash frac\{\backslash hbar\}\{2\}\; ,$$

where the uncertainty is given as the standard deviation of the measured value from its expected value. There are several other such pairs of physically measurable conjugate variables which obey a similar rule. One example is time vs. energy. The inverse relationship between the uncertainty of the two conjugate variables forces a tradeoff in quantum experiments, as measuring one quantity more precisely results in the other quantity becoming imprecise.

In addition to some assumptions underlying the interpretation of certain values in the quantum mechanical formulation, one of the fundamental cornerstones to the entire theory lies in the commutator relationship between the position operator $\backslash hat\{x\}$ and the momentum operator $\backslash hat\{p\}$:

$$[\backslash hat\{p\}\_i,\; \backslash hat\{x\}\_j]\; =\; -i\; \backslash hbar\; \backslash delta\_\{ij\}\; ,$$

where $\backslash delta\_\{ij\}$ is the Kronecker delta.

The Planck relation connects the particular photon energy {{math|E}} with its associated wave frequency {{math|f}}:

$$E\; =\; hf.$$

This energy is extremely small in terms of ordinarily perceived everyday objects.

Since the frequency {{math|f}}, wavelength {{math|λ}}, and speed of light {{math|c}} are related by $f=\; \backslash frac\{c\}\{\backslash lambda\}$, the relation can also be expressed as

$$E\; =\; \backslash frac\{hc\}\{\backslash lambda\}\; .$$

In 1923, Louis de Broglie generalized the Planck–Einstein relation by postulating that the Planck constant represents the proportionality between the momentum and the quantum wavelength of not just the photon, but the quantum wavelength of any particle. This was confirmed by experiments soon afterward. This holds throughout the quantum theory, including electrodynamics. The de Broglie wavelength {{math|λ}} of the particle is given by

$$\backslash lambda\; =\; \backslash frac\{h\}\{p\},$$

where {{math|p}} denotes the linear momentum of a particle, such as a photon, or any other elementary particle.

The energy of a photon with angular frequency {{math|1=ω = 2πf}} is given by

$$E\; =\; \backslash hbar\; \backslash omega\; ,$$

while its linear momentum relates to

$$p\; =\; \backslash hbar\; k\; ,$$

where {{math|k}} is an angular wavenumber.

These two relations are the temporal and spatial parts of the special relativistic expression using 4-vectors.

$$P^\backslash mu\; =\; \backslash left(\backslash frac\{E\}\{c\},\; \backslash vec\{p\}\backslash right)\; =\; \backslash hbar\; K^\backslash mu\; =\; \backslash hbar\backslash left(\backslash frac\{\backslash omega\}\{c\},\; \backslash vec\{k\}\backslash right).$$

Classical statistical mechanics requires the existence of {{math|h}} (but does not define its value).{{Citation |last1=Giuseppe Morandi |title=Statistical mechanics: an intermediate course |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MhInFlnNsREC&pg=PA51 |page=84 |year=2001 |access-date=2021-10-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211206180408/https://books.google.com/books?id=MhInFlnNsREC&pg=PA51 |url-status=live |isbn=978-981-02-4477-4 |archive-date=2021-12-06 |last2=F. Napoli |last3=E. Ercolessi|publisher=World Scientific }} Eventually, following upon Planck's discovery, it was speculated that physical action could not take on an arbitrary value, but instead was restricted to integer multiples of a very small quantity, the "[elementary] quantum of action", now called the Planck constant.{{Cite book |last=ter Haar |first=D. |url=https://archive.org/details/oldquantumtheory0000haar |title=The Old Quantum Theory |publisher=Pergamon Press |year=1967 |isbn=978-0-08-012101-7 |page=[https://archive.org/details/oldquantumtheory0000haar/page/133 133] |url-access=registration}} This was a significant conceptual part of the so-called "old quantum theory" developed by physicists including Bohr, Sommerfeld, and Ishiwara, in which particle trajectories exist but are hidden, but quantum laws constrain them based on their action. This view has been replaced by fully modern quantum theory, in which definite trajectories of motion do not even exist; rather, the particle is represented by a wavefunction spread out in space and in time.{{cite journal |last=Einstein |first=Albert |title=Physics and Reality |url=http://www.kostic.niu.edu/Physics_and_RealityAlbert_Einstein.pdf |journal=Daedalus |volume=132 |issue=4 |page=24 |year=2003 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120415132339/http://www.kostic.niu.edu/Physics_and_Reality-Albert_Einstein.pdf |url-status=dead |doi=10.1162/001152603771338742 |s2cid=57559543 |archive-date=2012-04-15 |quote=The question is first: How can one assign a discrete succession of energy values {{math|H_σ}} to a system specified in the sense of classical mechanics (the energy function is a given function of the coordinates {{math |q_r}} and the corresponding momenta {{math |p_r}})? The Planck constant {{math |h}} relates the frequency {{math |H_σ/h}} to the energy values {{math |H_σ}}. It is therefore sufficient to give to the system a succession of discrete frequency values.}}{{rp|373}} Related to this is the concept of energy quantization which existed in old quantum theory and also exists in altered form in modern quantum physics. Classical physics cannot explain quantization of energy.

The Planck constant has the same dimensions as action and as angular momentum (both with unit J·s = kg·m²·s⁻¹). The Planck constant is fixed at {{nowrap|$h$ {{=}} {{physconst|h}}}} as part of the definition of the SI units.{{SIbrochure9th}}

Alternatively, if the radian were considered a base unit, then $h$ would have the dimension of action (unit J·s), while $\backslash hbar$ would have the dimension of angular momentum (unit J·s·rad⁻¹), instead.{{cite journal | last1=Quincey | first1=Paul | last2=Brown | first2=Richard J C | title=Implications of adopting plane angle as a base quantity in the SI | journal=Metrologia | volume=53 | issue=3 | date=2016-06-01 | issn=0026-1394 | doi=10.1088/0026-1394/53/3/998 | doi-access=free | pages=998–1002 | arxiv=1604.02373 | bibcode=2016Metro..53..998Q }}

This value is used to define the SI unit of mass, the kilogram: "the kilogram [...] is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of {{math|h}} to be {{val|6.62607015|e=-34}} when expressed in the unit J⋅s, which is equal to kg⋅m²⋅s⁻¹, where the metre and the second are defined in terms of speed of light {{math|c}} and duration of hyperfine transition of the ground state of an unperturbed caesium-133 atom {{math|Δν_Cs}}." Technologies of mass metrology such as the Kibble balance measure the kilogram by fixing the Planck constant.

As $h$ has an exact defined value, the value of the reduced Planck constant $\backslash hbar$ can be calculated to arbitrary precision without any limiting uncertainty:

$\backslash hbar\; =\; \backslash frac\{h\}\{2\backslash pi\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{6.626\backslash ,070\backslash ,15\}\{2\backslash pi\}\backslash times10^\{-34\}\backslash ,\backslash mathrm\{J\; \{\backslash cdot\}\; s\}\; =\; 1.054\backslash ,571\backslash ,817...\backslash times10^\{-34\}\backslash ,\backslash mathrm\{J\; \{\backslash cdot\}\; s\}$

The Planck constant is one of the smallest constants used in physics. This reflects the fact that on a scale adapted to humans, where energies are typical of the order of kilojoules and times are typical of the order of seconds or minutes, the Planck constant is very small. When the product of energy and time for a physical event approaches the Planck constant, quantum effects dominate.{{Cite web |title=The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. II Ch. 19: The Principle of Least Action |url=https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_19.html |access-date=2023-11-03 |website=www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu}}

Equivalently, the order of the Planck constant reflects the fact that everyday objects and systems are made of a large number of microscopic particles. For example, in green light (with a wavelength of 555 nanometres or a frequency of {{val|540|u=THz}}) each photon has an energy {{nowrap|1={{math|E}} = {{math|hf}} = {{val|3.58|e=-19|u=J}}}}. This is a very small amount of energy in terms of everyday experience, but everyday experience is not concerned with individual photons any more than with individual atoms or molecules. An amount of light more typical in everyday experience (though much larger than the smallest amount perceivable by the human eye) is the energy of one mole of photons, which can be computed by multiplying the photon energy by the Avogadro number, {{physconst|NA|after=,|unit=no}} with the result of {{val|216|u=kJ}}, about equal to the food energy in a small fresh apple.{{cite book | title=Energy of Matter | edition=Revised | first=Joseph | last=Angelo | year=2020 | page=17 | isbn=9781438195803 | publisher=Infobase Publishing | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fWmLEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA17 | quote="A small fresh apple contains about 53 Cal (220 kJ);" }}

Many equations in quantum physics are customarily written using the reduced Planck constant,{{cite book |last1=Schwarz |first1=Patricia M. |last2=Schwarz |first2=John H. |author-link2=John Henry Schwarz|title=Special Relativity: From Einstein to Strings |date=25 March 2004 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-44950-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BmhQxWwk0K4C |language=en}}{{rp|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=BmhQxWwk0K4C&dq=%22The%20more%20commonly%20used%20constant%2C%20however%2C%20is%22&pg=PA105 104]}} also know as the Dirac constant,

equal to $\backslash frac\{h\}\{2\; \backslash pi\}$ and denoted $\backslash hbar$ (pronounced h-bar{{cite book |last1=Chabay |first1=Ruth W. |author-link1=Ruth Chabay |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zMWHEAAAQBAJ |title=Matter and Interactions |last2=Sherwood |first2=Bruce A. |date=20 November 2017 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-119-45575-2 |language=en}}{{rp|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=zMWHEAAAQBAJ&dq=%22pronounced+h-bar%22&pg=PA336 336]}}).

The combination $\backslash frac\{h\}\{2\; \backslash pi\}$ appeared in Niels Bohr's 1913 paper,{{cite journal |last=Bohr |first=N. |date=July 1913 |title=I. On the constitution of atoms and molecules |url=https://zenodo.org/record/2493915 |journal=The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science |volume=26 |issue=151 |pages=1–25 |doi=10.1080/14786441308634955|bibcode=1913PMag...26....1B }}{{rp|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=g1k3AQAAMAAJ&q=%22If+we+therefore+assume+that+the+orbit+of+the+electron+in%22 15]}} where it was denoted by {{nowrap|$M\_\{0\}$.}}{{rp|169}}{{efn|Bohr denoted by $M$ the angular momentum of the electron around the nucleus, and wrote the quantization condition as {{nowrap|$M=\backslash tau\; M\_\{0\}$,}} where $\backslash tau$ is a positive integer (see Bohr model).}} For the next 15 years, the combination continued to appear in the literature, but normally without a separate symbol.{{cite book |last1=Mehra |first1=Jagdish |author-link1=Jagdish Mehra|last2=Rechenberg |first2=Helmut|author-link2=Helmut Rechenberg |title=The Historical Development of Quantum Theory |volume=1|date=3 August 1982 |publisher=Springer New York |isbn=978-0-387-90642-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oLWNzwEACAAJ |language=en}}{{rp|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=MvxAAQAAIAAJ&q=%22electron+ring+in+protofluorine%22 180]}}{{efn|Here are some papers that are mentioned in and in which $\backslash frac\{h\}\{2\; \backslash pi\}$ appeared without a separate symbol:{{cite journal |last1=Sommerfeld |first1=A. |author-link1=Arnold Sommerfeld|title=Zur Theorie der Balmerschen Serie |journal=Sitzungsberichte der mathematisch-physikalischen Klasse der K. B. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München |date=1915 |volume=33 |issue=198 |pages=425–458|url=https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1140%2Fepjh%2Fe2013-40053-8/MediaObjects/13129_2013_121_MOESM1_ESM.pdf|doi=10.1140/epjh/e2013-40053-8}}{{rp|page=428}} {{cite journal |last1=Schwarzschild |first1=K. |author-link1=Karl Schwarzschild|title=Zur Quantenhypothese |journal=Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin|date=1916 |pages=548–568}}{{rp|page=[https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/93032#page/599/mode/1up 549]}} {{cite journal |last1=Ehrenfest |first1=P. |author-link1=Paul Ehrenfest|title=XLVIII. Adiabatic invariants and the theory of quanta |journal=The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science |date=June 1917 |volume=33 |issue=198 |pages=500–513 |doi=10.1080/14786440608635664}}{{rp|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=B6lJAAAAYAAJ&dq=%22we+must+demand+that+p+can+take+no+other+values+than%22&pg=PA508 508]}} {{cite journal |last1=Landé |first1=A. |author-link1=Alfred Landé|title=Das Serienspektrum des Heliums |journal=Physikalische Zeitschrift |date=June 1919 |volume=20 |pages= 228–234}}{{rp|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=2ZPqCAAAQBAJ&dq=%22festgelegt+,+w%C3%A4hrend+das+Valenzelektron+mit%22&pg=PA102 230]}} {{cite journal |last1=Bohr |first1=N.|author-link1=Niels Bohr |title=Über die Serienspektra der Elemente |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |date=October 1920 |volume=2 |issue=5 |pages=423–469 |doi=10.1007/BF01329978|bibcode=1920ZPhy....2..423B }}{{rp|page=458}} {{cite journal |last1=Stern |first1=Otto |author-link1=Otto Stern|title=Ein Weg zur experimentellen Prüfung der Richtungsquantelung im Magnetfeld |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |date=December 1921 |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=249–253 |doi=10.1007/BF01332793|bibcode=1921ZPhy....7..249S |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hlZKAAAAMAAJ&dq=%22Ein+Weg+zur+experimentellen+Pr%C3%BCfung+der+Richtungsquantelung%22+%22Bringen+wir+also+ein+Gas+aus+Atomen%22&pg=PA249|url-access=subscription }}{{cite journal |last1=Heisenberg |first1=Werner|author-link1=Werner Heisenberg |title=Zur Quantentheorie der Linienstruktur und der anomalen Zeemaneflekte |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |date=December 1922 |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=273–297 |doi=10.1007/BF01329602|bibcode=1922ZPhy....8..273H }}{{rp|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=KF2oBgAAQBAJ&dq=%22gegeben+ist,+hat+das+ganze+Atom+den+Drehimpuls%22&pg=PA137 276]}} {{cite journal |last1=Kramers |first1=H. A.|author-link1=Hans Kramers |last2=Pauli |first2=W.|author-link2=Wolfgang Pauli |title=Zur Theorie der Bandenspektren |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |date=December 1923 |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=351–367 |doi=10.1007/BF01328226|bibcode=1923ZPhy...13..351K |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9PpMAQAAIAAJ&dq=%22negativen+Halogenionen+ein+resultierendes%22&pg=RA1-PA351|url-access=subscription }}{{cite journal |last1=Born |first1=M. | author-link1=Max Born|last2=Jordan |first2=P.|author-link2=Pascual Jordan |title=Zur Quantenmechanik |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |date=December 1925 |volume=34 |issue=1 |pages=858–888 |doi=10.1007/BF01328531|bibcode=1925ZPhy...34..858B }}{{cite journal |last1=Dirac |first1=P. A. M.| author-link1=Paul Dirac |title=The fundamental equations of quantum mechanics |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character |date=December 1925 |volume=109 |issue=752 |pages=642–653 |doi=10.1098/rspa.1925.0150|doi-access=free |bibcode=1925RSPSA.109..642D }}.{{cite journal |last1=Born |first1=M.| author-link1=Max Born |last2=Heisenberg |first2=W.|author-link2=Werner Heisenberg |last3=Jordan |first3=P.|author-link3=Pascual Jordan |title=Zur Quantenmechanik. II. |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |date=August 1926 |volume=35 |issue=8–9 |pages=557–615 |doi=10.1007/BF01379806|bibcode=1926ZPhy...35..557B }}}} Then, in 1926, in their seminal papers, Schrödinger and Dirac again introduced special symbols for it: $K$ in the case of Schrödinger,{{cite journal |last1=Schrödinger |first1=Erwin |author-link1=Erwin Schrödinger |date=1926 |title=Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem |journal=Annalen der Physik |volume=384 |issue=4 |pages=361–376 |bibcode=1926AnP...384..361S |doi=10.1002/andp.19263840404 |doi-access=free}} and $h$ in the case of Dirac.{{cite journal |last1=Dirac |first1=Paul A. M. |author-link1=Paul Dirac |date=October 1926 |title=On the theory of quantum mechanics |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character |volume=112 |issue=762 |pages=661–677 |bibcode=1926RSPSA.112..661D |doi=10.1098/rspa.1926.0133 |doi-access=free}} Dirac continued to use $h$ in this way until 1930,{{cite book |last1=Mehra |first1=Jagdish |author-link1=Jagdish Mehra|last2=Rechenberg |first2=Helmut|author-link2=Helmut Rechenberg |title=The Historical Development of Quantum Theory |volume=6|date=2000 |publisher=Springer|location= New York |language=en}}{{rp|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=warvAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Until+1930,+Dirac+always+wrote%22 291]}} when he introduced the symbol $\backslash hbar$ in his book The Principles of Quantum Mechanics.{{rp|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=warvAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Until+1930,+Dirac+always+wrote%22 291]}} {{cite book |last1=Dirac |first1=Paul A. M. |author-link1=Paul Dirac |title=The Principles of Quantum Mechanics |date=1930 |publisher=Clarendon |edition=1st |location=Oxford, U.K.}}

{{Portal|Electronics|Chemistry}}

• Committee on Data of the International Science Council
• International System of Units
• Introduction to quantum mechanics
• List of scientists whose names are used in physical constants
• Planck units
• Wave–particle duality

{{notelist}}

{{reflist}}

{{refbegin}}

• {{citation |last=Barrow |first=John D. |title=The Constants of Nature; From Alpha to Omega – The Numbers that Encode the Deepest Secrets of the Universe |url=https://archive.org/details/constantsofnatur0000barr |year=2002 |publisher=Pantheon Books |isbn=978-0-375-42221-8 |author-link=John D. Barrow |url-access=registration}}

{{refend}}

• [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhgb23tAFFs&list=PL-vj-3_a7wTDeKEupZSX7Tw42yReNgJLl "The role of the Planck constant in physics" – presentation at 26th CGPM meeting at Versailles, France, November 2018 when voting took place.]
• [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nV9f5uqul0&t=84s "The Planck constant and its units" – presentation at the 35th Symposium on Chemical Physics at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 3 November 2019.]

{{Authority control}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2025}}

Category:Fundamental constants

Category:1900 in science

Category:Max Planck