Racial profiling#United States

{{Short description|Law-enforcement practice}}

{{Discrimination sidebar|expanded=Manifestations}}

Racial profiling or ethnic profiling is the offender profiling, selective enforcement or selective prosecution based on race or ethnicity, rather than individual suspicion or evidence. This practice involves discrimination against minority populations and often relies on negative stereotypes. Racial profiling can include disproportionate stop-and-searches, traffic stops, and the use of surveillance technology for facial identification.{{cite web|title=Racial Profiling|url=https://www.aclu.org/issues/racial-justice/race-and-criminal-justice/racial-profiling|website=American Civil Liberties Union|access-date=September 12, 2024}} Racial profiling can occur de jure (when state policies target specific racial groups) or de facto (when the practice occurs outside official legislation).{{cite web|title=Racial Profiling|url=https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/racial-profiling|website=National Institute of Justice|access-date=September 12, 2024}}{{Dead link|date=September 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} Critics argue that racial profiling is discriminatory as it disproportionately targets people of color. Supporters claim it can be an effective tool for preventing crime but acknowledge that it should be closely monitored and used in a way that respects civil rights.{{cite web|title=Racial Profiling|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/racial-profiling|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|access-date=September 12, 2024}}{{cite web|title=Racial Profiling|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/racial-profiling/|website=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|access-date=September 12, 2024}}{{Dead link|date=September 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}{{cite web|title=Racial Profiling Violates Human Rights|url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/06/05/racial-profiling-violates-human-rights|website=Human Rights Watch|access-date=September 12, 2024}}{{Dead link|date=September 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}{{cite web|title=Racial Profiling in the Age of Terrorism|url=https://www.brookings.edu/research/racial-profiling-in-the-age-of-terrorism/|website=Brookings Institution|access-date=September 12, 2024}}

The subject of racial profiling has sparked debate between philosophers who disagree on its moral status. Some believe that racial profiling is morally permissible under certain circumstances, whereas others argue it is never morally permissible.

Justifications

Those who argue in favor of racial profiling usually set some conditions for racial profiling to be justified, typically fairness, evidence-basedness and non-abusiveness.{{Cite book |last=Lever |first=Annabelle |title=Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Race |publisher=OUP |year=2016 |isbn=978-0190236953 |editor-last=Zack |edition=1st |pages=425–435 |chapter=Race and Racial Profiling}} Proponents of racial profiling generally argue that, if these conditions are met, it can be an efficient tool for crime prevention because it allows law enforcement to focus their efforts on groups that are according to crime statistics and correlates of crime more likely to commit crimes.{{Cite journal |last=Risse and Zeckhauser |date=2004 |title=Racial Profiling |url=https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00009.x |journal=Philosophy & Public Affairs |volume=32 |issue=2 |pages=131–170 |doi=10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00009.x}}

Mathias Risse and Richard Zeckhauser provide a consequentialist analysis of racial profiling, weighing the benefits and costs against each other. They conclude that racial profiling is morally permissible because the harms done to the search subjects are fewer than the potential benefits for society in terms of security. Moreover, the (innocent) subjects themselves also benefit because they will live a safer environment overall.

Risse and Zeckhauser conclude that the objections to racial profiling are not rooted in the practice per se but in background injustice in our societies. Instead of banning racial profiling, they argue, efforts should be made to remedy racial inequality in our societies.{{Cite journal |last=Risse |first=Mathias |date=2007 |title=Racial profiling: A reply to two critics |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2007.9992207 |journal=Criminal Justice Ethics |volume=26 |issue=1 |pages=4–19|doi=10.1080/0731129X.2007.9992207 |s2cid=144965055 }}

Criticism

Opponents of racial profiling have claimed that those who support racial profiling grossly underestimate the harms done by racial profiling and fail to recognize how the practice can exacerbate racism.

Adam Omar Hosein argues that racial profiling may be permissible under certain circumstances, but the present circumstances (in the United States) make it unjust. The costs of racial profiling for black communities in the U.S. are much higher than Risse and Zeckhauer account for. Racial profiling can make targeted individuals assume they have an inferior political status, which can lead to an alienation from the state. This can make racial profiling turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy when an individual is more likely to commit a crime because they are perceived as a criminal.{{Cite journal |last=Hosein |first=Adam Omar |date=2018 |title=Racial Profiling and a Reasonable Sense of Inferior Political Status |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12162 |journal=Journal of Political Philosophy |volume=26 |issue=3 |pages=1–20 |doi=10.1111/jopp.12162 |s2cid=149645353}}

Hosein also points to an epistemic problem. Arguments in favor of racial profiling are based on the premise that there is a correlation between belonging to a specific racial group and committing certain crimes. However, should such a correlation exist, it is based on data that is skewed by previous racial profiling. Because more subjects of a certain racial group were targeted, more crime was registered in this group. It is therefore epistemically unjustified to assume that this group commits more crime. Racial profiling intersects with gendered profiling. Some argue profiling of men contributes to sex differences in crime.{{cite journal | title=Beyond Driving While Black and Flying While Brown: Using Intersectionality to Uncover the Gendered Aspects of Racial Profiling | journal=Colum. J. Gender & L. | date=8 March 2021 | url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/coljgl12&div=13&id=&page= | access-date=12 August 2024}}

By country

=Australia=

{{Main|Aboriginal deaths in custody|Indigenous Australians and crime}}

=Canada=

Accusations of racial profiling of visible minorities who accuse police of targeting them due to their ethnic background is a growing concern in Canada. In 2005, the Kingston Police released the first study ever in Canada which pertains to racial profiling. The study focused on the city of Kingston, Ontario, a small city where most of the inhabitants are white. The study showed that black-skinned people were 3.7 times more likely to be pulled over by police than white-skinned people, while Asian and White people are less likely to be pulled over than Black people.{{cite news|title=Police stop more blacks, Ont. study finds|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/police-stop-more-blacks-ont-study-finds-1.565724|publisher=CBC News|access-date=June 8, 2010 | date=May 27, 2005}} Several police organizations condemned this study and suggested more studies like this would make them hesitant to pull over visible minorities.

Canadian Aboriginals are more likely to be charged with crimes, particularly on reserves. The Canadian crime victimization survey does not collect data on the ethnic origin of perpetrators, so comparisons between incidence of victimizations and incidence of charging are impossible.{{citation|last1=Brzozowski|first1=Jodi-Anne|title=Victimization and offending among the Aboriginal population in Canada|url=http://www.statcan.gc.ca/bsolc/olc-cel/olc-cel?lang=eng&catno=85-002-X20060039199|volume=26|issue=3|publisher=Statistics Canada|last2=Taylor-Butts|first2=Andrea|last3=Johnson|first3=Sara|date=6 June 2006}} Although aboriginal persons make up 3.6% of Canada's population, they account for 20% of Canada's prison population. This may show how racial profiling increases effectiveness of police, or be a result of racial profiling, as they are watched more intensely than others.{{cite web|url=http://www41.statcan.ca/2006/2693/ceb2693_002-eng.htm|title=Aboriginal people over-represented in Saskatchewan's prisons|website=Statistics Canada|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090227153925/http://www41.statcan.ca/2006/2693/ceb2693_002-eng.htm|archive-date=2009-02-27|url-status=dead|access-date=2010-03-11|df=mdy-all}}

In February 2010, an investigation of the Toronto Star daily newspaper found that black people across Toronto were three times more likely to be stopped and documented by police than white people. To a lesser extent, the same seemed true for people described by police as having "brown" skin (South Asians, Arabs and Latinos). This was the result of an analysis of 1.7 million contact cards filled out by Toronto Police officers in the period 2003–2008.{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/761551--when-good-people-are-swept-up-with-the-bad|title=When good people are swept up with the bad|last=Rankin|first=Jim|date=2010-02-06|work=Toronto Star|access-date=July 29, 2010|quote=When good people are swept up with the bad - We're not trying to make any excuses for this. We recognize that bias in police decision making is a big, big issue for us, and so we're working really hard on it.}}

The Ontario Human Rights Commission states that "police services have acknowledged that racial profiling does occur and have taken [and are taking] measures to address [the issue], including upgrading training for officers, identifying officers at risk of engaging in racial profiling, and improving community relations".{{cite book|last=Griffiths|first=Curt|title=Canadian Police Work|year=2008|publisher=Nelson Education|location=Toronto|isbn=978-0176424107|page=[https://archive.org/details/canadianpolicewo0000grif/page/311 311]|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/canadianpolicewo0000grif/page/311}} Ottawa Police addressed this issue and planned on implementing a new policy regarding officer racially profiling persons, "the policy explicitly forbids officers from investigating or detaining anyone based on their race and will force officers to go through training on racial profiling".{{cite web|url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/ottawa-police-introduce-new-racial-profiling-policy-1.684206|title=Ottawa police introduce new racial profiling policy|date=2011-08-16|website=CTV News|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120723024712/http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20110816/racial-profiling-policy-110816/|archive-date=2012-07-23|url-status=live}} This policy was implemented after the 2008 incident where an African Canadian woman was strip searched by members of the Ottawa police. There is a video showing the strip search where one witnesses the black woman being held to the ground and then having her bra and shirt cut ripped/cut off by a member of the Ottawa Police Force which was released to the viewing of the public in 2010.

=China=

The Chinese government has been using a facial recognition surveillance technology, analysing physiognomical output of surveillance cameras to track and control Uyghurs, a Muslim minority in China's Western province of Xinjiang. The extent of the vast system was published in the spring of 2019 by the NYT who called it "automated racism".{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/technology/china-surveillance-artificial-intelligence-racial-profiling.html |title=One Month, 500,000 Face Scans: How China Is Using A.I. to Profile a Minority |last=Mozur |first=Paul |date=2019-04-14 |work=The New York Times |access-date=2019-12-04 |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}} In research projects aided by European institutions it has combined the facial output with people's DNA, to create an ethnic profile. The DNA was collected at the prison camps, which are interning more than one million Uyghurs, as had been corroborated in November 2019 by data leaks, such as the China Cables.{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/03/business/china-dna-uighurs-xinjiang.html |title=China Uses DNA to Map Faces, With Help From the West |last1=Wee |first1=Sui-Lee |date=2019-12-03 |work=The New York Times |access-date=2019-12-04 |last2=Mozur |first2=Paul |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-55634388|title = Huawei patent mentions use of Uighur-spotting tech|work = BBC News|date = 13 January 2021}}

=Germany=

In February 2012, the first court ruling concerning racial profiling in German police policy, allowing police to use skin color and "non-German ethnic origin" to select persons who will be asked for identification in spot-checks for illegal immigrants.{{Cite news|url=http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-press-review-on-court-ruling-allowing-police-checks-based-on-skin-color-a-824601.html|title=The World from Berlin: Profiling Ruling 'Sows Seeds of Distrust and Racism'|date=2012-03-29|work=Spiegel Online|access-date=2019-01-08}} Subsequently, it was decided legal for a person submitted to a spot-check to compare the policy to that of the SS in public.{{cite web|title=Anwaltskanzlei Sven Adam Polizei-, Ordnungs- und Versammlungsrecht Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main - Az.: 2 Ss 329/11|url=http://www.anwaltskanzlei-adam.de/index.php?id=106,753,0,0,1,0}} A higher court later overruled the earlier decision declaring the racial profiling unlawful and in violation of anti-discrimination provisions in Art. 3 Basic Law and the General Equal Treatment Act of 2006.{{Cite news|url=https://www.taz.de/!5080660/|title=Urteil zu Kontrollen nach Hautfarbe: Gericht verbietet Polizei-Rassismus|last=Rath|first=Christian|date=2012-10-30|work=Die Tageszeitung: taz|access-date=2019-01-08|language=de|trans-title=Judgment on checks on skin color: Court bans police racism|issn=0931-9085}}

The civil rights organisation Büro zur Umsetzung von Gleichbehandlung (Office for the Implementation of Equal Treatment) makes a distinction between criminal profiling, which is legitimate in Germany, and ethnic profiling, which is not.{{Cite web|url=http://www.bug-ev.org/en/topics/focus-areas/dossiers/ethnic-profiling/what-is-ethnic-profiling.html|title=What is ethnic profiling?|website=www.bug-ev.org|access-date=2019-01-08|archive-date=2018-10-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181017181329/http://www.bug-ev.org/en/topics/focus-areas/dossiers/ethnic-profiling/what-is-ethnic-profiling.html|url-status=dead}}

According to a 2016 report by the Interior ministry in Germany, there had been an increase in hate crimes and violence against migrant groups in Germany.{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39096833|title=Germany hate crime: Nearly 10 attacks a day on migrants in 2016|date=2017-02-26|work=BBC News|access-date=2017-03-06|language=en-GB}} The reports concluded that there were more than 10 attacks per day against migrants in Germany in 2016. This report from Germany garnered the attention of the United Nations, which alleged that people of African descent face widespread discrimination in Germany.{{Cite news|url=http://www.politico.eu/article/un-says-racial-profiling-widespread-in-germany/|title=UN says racial profiling widespread in Germany|last=Saeed|first=Saim|date=2017-02-28|work=POLITICO|access-date=2017-03-06|language=en-US}}

A 2017 statement by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Rights after a visit to Germany states: "While the Basic Law guarantees equality, prohibits racial discrimination, and states that human dignity is inviolable, it is not being enforced." and calls racial profiling by police officials endemic. Recommendations include legal reform, establishing an independent complaint system, training and continuing education for the police, and investigations to promote accountability and remedy.{{Cite web|url=https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=21233|title=Statement to the media by the United Nations' Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent, on the conclusion of its official visit to Germany, 20-27 February 2017|date=27 February 2017|access-date=4 November 2021|website=Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights}}

=Ethiopia=

{{main|Ethnic discrimination in Ethiopia#Tigray War}}

Ethnic profiling against Tigrayans occurred during the Tigray War that started in November 2020, with Ethiopians of Tigrayan ethnicity being put on indefinite leave from Ethiopian Airlines or refused permission to board, prevented from overseas travel, and an "order of identifying ethnic Tigrayans from all government agencies and NGOs" being used by federal police to request a list of ethnic Tigrayans from an office of the World Food Programme. Tigrayans' houses were arbitrarily searched and Tigrayan bank accounts were suspended. Ethnic Tigrayan members of Ethiopian components of United Nations peacekeeping missions were disarmed and some forcibly flown back to Ethiopia, at the risk of torture or execution, according to United Nations officials.

=Israel=

{{main|Racial profiling in Israel}}

In 1972, terrorists from the Japanese Red Army launched an attack that led to the deaths of at least 24 people at Ben Gurion Airport. Since then, security at the airport has relied on a number of fundamentals, including a heavy focus on what Raphael Ron, former director of security at Ben Gurion, terms the "human factor", which he generalized as "the inescapable fact that terrorist attacks are carried out by people who can be found and stopped by an effective security methodology."{{Cite web|url=http://securitysolutions.com/news/security_exposing_hostile_intent/|title=What can we learn from Ben Gurion Airport in Israel to help push aviation security in the U.S. to the next level?|website=SecuritySolutions.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151108172211/http://securitysolutions.com/news/security_exposing_hostile_intent/|archive-date=2015-11-08|url-status=dead|access-date=2017-01-08}} As part of its focus on this so-called "human factor", Israeli security officers interrogate travelers using racial profiling, singling out those who appear to be Arab based on name or physical appearance.International Herald Tribune, [http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/09/09/africa/ME-Israel-Airport-Dance.php Israeli airport security order dancer to prove identity with dance steps], September 9, 2008 Additionally, all passengers, including those who do not appear to be of Arab descent, are questioned as to why they are traveling to Israel, followed by several general questions about the trip in order to search for inconsistencies.{{Cite web|url=http://volokh.com/posts/1196146293.shtml|title=Airport Security in Israel|last=Somin|first=Ilya|date=2007-11-27|website=The Volokh Conspiracy|access-date=2019-01-08}} Although numerous civil rights groups{{which|date=September 2016}} have demanded an end to the profiling, the Israeli government maintains that it is both effective and unavoidable.{{Cite journal|last1=Hasisi|first1=Badi|last2=Margalioth|first2=Yoram|last3=Orgad|first3=Liav|date=2012|title=Ethnic Profiling In Airport Screening: Lessons From Israel, 1968-2010|journal=American Law and Economics Review|volume=14|issue=2|pages=517–560|jstor=42705624|doi=10.1093/aler/ahs009}} According to Ariel Merari, an Israeli terrorism expert,{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-11770842|title=New study delves inside a suicide bomber's mind|last=Lee|first=Dave|date=2010-11-17|work=BBC News|access-date=2016-09-16|language=en-GB}} "it would be foolish not to use profiling when everyone knows that most terrorists come from certain ethnic groups. They are likely to be Muslim and young, and the potential threat justifies inconveniencing a certain ethnic group."{{cite news|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna23714853|title=Rights group challenges Israel's airport security|date=March 19, 2008|newspaper=Associated Press|access-date=October 26, 2011}}

=Japan=

In December 2021, the U.S. Embassy in Tokyo, Japan warned of "suspected racial profiling" by police across Japan against non-Japanese residents.{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-embassy-tokyo-warns-suspected-racial-profiling-by-japanese-police-2021-12-06/ |title=U.S. embassy in Tokyo warns of 'suspected racial profiling' by Japanese police |first1=Chang-Ran |last1=Kim |first2=Elaine |last2=Lies |publisher=Reuters |date=6 December 2021 |accessdate=4 April 2025}} Since 2022, the number of people coming forward about racial profiling complaints against police officers in Japan has greatly expanded. In January 2024, three foreign-born residents of Japan filed a lawsuit which alleged they were repeatedly questioned by police based on their physical appearances, with one plaintiff, Pakistan-born Syed Zain, claiming that he was harassed by police at least 70 times since arriving in Japan in 2002.{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-68137532 |title=Japan: Foreign-born residents sue government for alleged racial profiling |first=Kelly |last=Ng |publisher=BBC News |date=29 January 2024 |accessdate=4 April 2025}} On 30 April 2024, an article was published by the The Mainichi which provided some detail how an investigation found that numerous Japanese police officers had a high rate of racial profiling incidents which involved the targeting of foreigners.{{cite news |url=https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20240427/p2a/00m/0na/019000c |title='We were told to target foreigners': Ex-officer on systematic racial profiling by Japan police |publisher=The Mainichi |date=30 April 2024 |accessdate=4 April 2025}} One former officer inspector from a west Japan prefecture which saw police consistently being ordered by senior officers target foreigners for questioning, ID checks and searches even claimed to the newspaper that "we were told to target foreigners." People with Korean, black and Southeast Asian roots were among those most frequently targeted, with white people being less targeted and often being considered by police to be either "tourists" or having "a Japanese partner." On May 8, 2022, the New York Times reported that racial profiling was "prevalent" in Japan, but not often documented.{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/04/world/asia/japan-police-racial-profiling-tokyo.html |title=Racial Profiling in Japan is Prevalent but Unseen |publisher=New York Times |date=8 May 2025 |accessdate=4 April 2025}}

=Mexico=

The General Law on Population (Reglamento de la Ley General de Poblacion) of 2000 in Mexico has been cited as being used to racially profile and abuse immigrants to Mexico.{{Cite news|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/3/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/|title=Mexico's illegals laws tougher than Arizona's|last=Seper|first=Jerry|date=2010-05-03|work=The Washington Times|access-date=2017-03-07|language=en-US}} Mexican law makes illegal immigration punishable by law and allows law officials great discretion in identifying and questioning illegal immigrants. Mexico has been criticized for its immigration policy. Chris Hawley of USA Today stated that "Mexico has a law that is no different from Arizona's", referring to legislation which gives local police forces the power to check documents of people suspected of being in the country illegally.{{cite news | url=https://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2010-05-25-mexico-migrants_N.htm | title=Activists blast Mexico's immigration law | author=Hawley, Chris | newspaper=USA Today | date=May 25, 2010}} Immigration and human rights activists have also noted that Mexican authorities frequently engage in racial profiling, harassment, and shakedowns against migrants from Central America.

=Sri Lanka=

Ethnic Sri Lankan Tamils traveling from the Northern Province and Eastern Province in Sri Lanka have to compulsory register with the Police and mandatory carry a police certificate as per the Prevention of Terrorism Act and emergency regulations if found not living in the house in the certificate they could be arrested.{{cite book|author=Anoma Pieris|title=Sovereignty, Space and Civil War in Sri Lanka: Porous Nation|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lfl0DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT93|accessdate=9 July 2021|date=25 October 2018|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-1-351-24632-3|pages=93–}}{{cite book|author=Sharika Thiranagama|title=In My Mother's House: Civil War in Sri Lanka|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D1b053j2-PYC&pg=PA250|accessdate=9 July 2021|date=16 August 2011|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|isbn=978-0-8122-0511-4|pages=250–}}{{cite web | url=https://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=13&artid=39075 | title=SL State reinforces stringent police registration of residents in Colombo | publisher=Tamilnet | date=22 May 2018 | accessdate=9 July 2021}}{{cite web | url=https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2014/03/06/LKA102016.E.pdf | title=RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) | publisher=Justice Government | date=11 December 2006 | accessdate=9 July 2021 | archive-date=9 July 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709213139/https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2014/03/06/LKA102016.E.pdf | url-status=dead }}{{cite web | url=https://www.refworld.org/docid/4f4f38972.html | title=Sri Lanka: Treatment of Tamils in Colombo by members of the Sri Lankan security forces and police; registration requirements in Colombo for Tamil citizens | publisher=RefWorld | date=9 February 2012 | accessdate=9 July 2021}}{{cite web | url=https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/tamils-must-register-police | title=Tamils must register with Police | publisher=Tamil Guardian | date=15 July 2006 | accessdate=9 July 2021}}{{cite book|author=Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and House Committee on Foreign Affairs|title=Country reports on human rights practices|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j39VnkS4VwYC&pg=PA2613|accessdate=9 July 2021|date=20 February 2013|publisher=Government Printing Office|pages=2613–|id=GGKEY:NN89UP1JS4T}} In 2007 Tamils were expelled from Colombo. The move to expel these people drew wide criticism of the government. The United States Embassy in Sri Lanka condemned the act, asking the government of Sri Lanka to ensure the constitutional rights of all the citizens of the country.{{cite news|title=The United States condemns the forced removal of Tamils |date=2007-06-08 |publisher=U.S. Department of State. |url=http://srilanka.usembassy.gov/pr-08june2007.html |work=press release June 2007 |access-date=2007-06-08 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091105131731/http://srilanka.usembassy.gov/pr-08june2007.html |archive-date=November 5, 2009 }} Norway also condemned the act, describing it as a clear violation of international human rights law. Their press release urged government of Sri Lanka to desist from any further enforced removals.{{cite news|title=Norway condemns enforced removal of Tamils from Colombo |date=2007-06-08 |publisher=Norway - the official site in Sri Lanka. |url=http://www.norway.lk/press/press+releases/press+releases.htm |work=press release June 2007 |access-date=2007-06-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070318202614/http://www.norway.lk/press/press+releases/press+releases.htm |archive-date=2007-03-18 |url-status=dead }} Canada has also condemned the action.{{cite news|title=Canada condemns 'dislodging' of Tamils |date=2007-06-08 |publisher=Dailymirrir |url=http://www.dailymirror.lk/2007/06/11/news/7.asp |access-date=2007-06-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930225250/http://www.dailymirror.lk/2007/06/11/news/7.asp |archive-date=2007-09-30 |url-status=dead }} Human rights groups, Local think tank and other observers have termed this act as "ethnic cleansing".{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6729555.stm | work=BBC News | title=Police evict Tamils from Colombo | date=2007-06-07 | access-date=2010-05-02}}{{cite magazine| url=http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1631473,00.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070615003452/http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1631473,00.html | url-status=dead | archive-date=June 15, 2007 | magazine=Time | date=2007-06-11 | access-date=2010-05-02 | title="Ethnic Cleansing" in Sri Lanka?}}[http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/jun/08lanka.htm Apex court halts eviction of Tamils from Colombo][http://in.news.yahoo.com/070608/211/6gskx.html]{{dead link|date=December 2016|bot=InternetArchiveBot|fix-attempted=yes}}{{cite news| url=https://www.theguardian.com/international/story/0,,2097984,00.html | work=The Guardian | location=London | title=Ethnic cleansing claim after police move Tamils at gunpoint | first=Randeep | last=Ramesh | date=2007-06-08 | access-date=2010-05-02}}{{cite news| url=https://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSCOL6048 | title=Sri Lanka court blocks state deportation of Tamils | date=2007-06-08 | work=Reuters | first=Simon | last=Gardner}} The media group said that this type of act reminds people of what "Hitler did to the Jews",{{cite news|url=https://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070607/wl_sthasia_afp/srilankapoliticsunrestrights_070607124831| title= Sri Lanka police evict ethnic Tamils from capital | date= 2007-06-07 | publisher = AFP | first = Jayasinghe | last = Amal | access-date = 2007-06-07}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}} and the Asian Center of Human Rights urged India to intervene.{{cite news|url=http://www.achrweb.org/press/2007/SLK0307.htm|title=Deportation of Tamils from Colombo is reminiscent of The Holocaust|date=2007-06-08|access-date=2007-06-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070610124824/http://www.achrweb.org/press/2007/SLK0307.htm|archive-date=2007-06-10|url-status=dead}}

=Spain=

Racial profiling by police forces in Spain is a common practice.{{cite web|title=The police have arrested me 160 times just because of my appearance|date=7 January 2014 |url=http://elpais.com/elpais/2014/01/07/inenglish/1389099066_776750.html}} A study by the University of Valencia, found that people of non-white aspect are up to ten times more likely to be stopped by the police on the street.{{cite web|title=Identificación policial por perfil étnico en españa|url=http://www.uv.es/garciaj/pub/2013_perfil_etnico.pdf}} Amnesty International accused Spanish authorities of using racial and ethnic profiling, with police singling out people who are not white in the street and public places.{{Cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/spain-police-accused-of-racial-profiling-6276849.html|title=Spain police accused of racial profiling|last1=Giles|first1=Ciaran|date=2011-12-14|work=The Independent|access-date=2019-01-08|agency=Associated Press|last2=Clendenning|first2=Alan}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/2012/05/29/153901342/spanish-police-accused-of-racially-profiling|title=Spanish Police Accused Of Racially Profiling|last=Frayer|first=Lauren|date=2012-05-29|website=NPR|language=en|access-date=2019-01-08}}

In 2011, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) urged the Spanish government to take "effective measures" to ethnic profiling, including the modification of existing laws and regulations which permit its practice.{{cite web|title=Examen de los informes presentados por los Estados partes de conformidad con el artículo 9 de la Convención: España|url=http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cerd/docs/co/Spain_AUV_sp.pdf}} In 2013, the UN Special Rapporteur, Mutuma Ruteere, described the practice of ethnic profiling by Spanish law enforcement officers "a persisting and pervasive problem".{{cite web|title=Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, Mutuma Ruteere|url=http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A.HRC.23.56.Add.3_ENG.pdf

}} In 2014, the Spanish government approved a law which prohibited racial profiling by police forces.{{Cite web|url=https://www.elperiodico.com/es/politica/20140711/inerior-prohibe-por-ley-las-identificaciones-por-razones-etnicas-3372691|title=Interior prohíbe por ley las identificaciones por razones étnicas|last=Navarro|first=Mayka|date=2014-07-11|website=elPeriodico|language=es|access-date=2019-01-08}}

=United Kingdom=

Racial issues have been prevalent in the UK for a long time. For example, following the arrival of Windrush migrants from the Caribbean and West Indies after the Second World War, racial tensions began to flare up in the country - see the Notting Hill Race Riot. The most recent statistics from the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford in 2019 show that people born outside of the UK made up 14% of the UK's population or 9.5 million people. Black Britons make up 3% of the population and Indian Britons occupy 2.3% of the population with the remainder being largely EU or North American migrants.{{cite web |last1=Vargas-Silva |first1=Carlos |title=Dr |url=https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/migrants-in-the-uk-an-overview/ |website=migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk |publisher=The Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford |access-date=10 June 2021}}

An increase in knife crime in the capital in recent decades has led to an increase in police stop and search powers. However, there are concerns that these powers lead to discrimination and racial profiling with statistics showing that there were 54 stop and searches for every 1000 black people compared to just 6 for every 1000 white people.{{cite web |url=https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/crime-justice-and-the-law/policing/stop-and-search/latest |website=gov.uk |publisher=UK Home Office |access-date=10 June 2021|title=Stop and search }} Following social dissatisfaction and claims of institutional racism, the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities published The report of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities in 2021, finding overall that there was no institutional racism in the UK.{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-report-of-the-commission-on-race-and-ethnic-disparities |website=gov.uk |publisher=Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities |access-date=10 June 2021|title=The report of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities |date=28 April 2021 }} The report and its findings were criticised by many including the United Nations working group who argued that the report 'attempts to normalise white supremacy' and could 'fuel racism'.{{cite news |title=Race report: UN experts say conclusions could 'fuel racism' |work=BBC News |date=19 April 2021 |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56800763 |access-date=10 June 2021}}

=United States=

{{Main|Racial profiling in the United States}}

{{see also|Airport racial profiling in the United States|Race and crime in the United States}}

In the United States, racial profiling is mainly used when referring to the disproportionate searching of African Americans, and Hispanic, along with other visible minorities.

According to an American College of Physicians study, 92% of Blacks, 78% of Latino Americans, 75% of Native Americans, and 61% of Asian Americans have “reported experiencing racial discrimination in the form of racial slurs, violence, threats, and harassment.”

Racial profiling has roots in slavery and has grown with the rise of urbanization, conflated with gentrification. The US harbors a sense of fear and danger in people of color through the uncontested use of racial profiling in day-to-day interactions - from personal implicit biases, overt and covert racist laws and practices, and discriminatory law enforcement agencies.

Sociologist Robert Staples said that racial profiling in the U.S. is “not merely a collection of individual offenses”, but rather a systemic phenomenon across American society, dating back to the era of slavery.

“At the root of the emergence of the modern Anglo-American police was the problem of changing social relations and conditions arising from industrialization and urbanization,” says sociologist Dr. Tia Dafnos.

This is exemplified in the large wage and generational wealth gaps and workplace and housing discrimination that exists between the White and non-White populations. Racial profiling in policing institutions is not new, either. The modern American police force has taken inspiration and structure from slave patrols and as a result people in minority populations report high rates of unfair treatment by courts, unreasonable arrests and frisking, and hesitancy to call the police in times of need out of fear of discrimination.

The US Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure, was extended after a run of controversial court cases in the 1960s in which people of color were facing higher rates of frisking and intimidation. This extension says that police must obey the law while enforcing it. Although the Supreme Court has claimed continued adherence to objectivity in the face of Fourth Amendment cases, American police employ racial profiling with harmful consequences.

Recent incidents of racial profiling, often in mundane situations like traffic stops, have resulted in unnecessary violence and deaths. Data suggest that “African American and American Indian/Alaska Native women and men are killed by the police at higher rates” than their White counterparts, and Latinx men are killed at higher rates than White men. African American men are 2.5 times more likely to be killed by police than White men.

Unlawful and wrongful death in the cases of George Floyd and Sonya Massey have been attributed to extreme racial profiling and met with social media outburst and growing attention towards the Black Lives Matter and Say Her Name movements. The Terry v. Ohio court case of 1968 has also led to countless incidents of racial profiling in the US, as it allows police officers to stop an individual or vehicle without probable cause if they think an individual is committing a crime or about to commit a crime, although they must have a reasonable suspicion based on "specific and articulable facts". The driving while black phenomenon draws from data that supports that people of color disproportionately experience police shootings, traffic stops, searches, and arrests.

See also

References

{{Reflist|refs=

{{cite news | last1= Zelalem | first1= Zecharias | title= Ethiopia Airlines accused of ethnic profiling over civil war with Tigray | date= 2020-12-04 |newspaper= The Daily Telegraph | url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/04/ethiopia-airlines-accused-ethnic-profiling-civil-war-tigray/ |access-date=2021-01-16 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210123030421/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/04/ethiopia-airlines-accused-ethnic-profiling-civil-war-tigray/ |archive-date= 2021-01-23 |url-status=live }} [https://archive.todayRCAyw Alt URL]

{{cite web |url=https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/news-feature/2020/12/16/Ethnic-profiling-Tigray-tensions-Ethiopia |title=Ethnic profiling of Tigrayans heightens tensions in Ethiopia | website=The New Humanitarian |last1=Freudenthal |first1=Emmanuel |archive-url=https://archive.today/20210116025606/https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/news-feature/2020/12/16/Ethnic-profiling-Tigray-tensions-Ethiopia |archive-date=2021-01-16 |url-status=live |date=17 December 2020}}

{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/ethiopia-conflict-tigrayans/ethiopian-police-seeking-lists-of-ethnic-tigrayans-u-n-report-idINKBN27T1B7 |title=Ethiopian police seeking lists of ethnic Tigrayans – U.N. report |quote = Ethiopian police visited a U.N. World Food Programme (WFP) office in Amhara region to request a list of ethnic Tigrayan staff, according to an internal U.N. security report seen by Reuters on Friday. ... The U.N. report said that the local police chief informed the WFP office of "the order of identifying ethnic Tigrayans from all government agencies and NGOs". |agency=Thomson Reuters |archive-url=https://archive.today/20210116034322/https://www.reuters.com/article/ethiopia-conflict-tigrayans/ethiopian-police-seeking-lists-of-ethnic-tigrayans-u-n-report-idINKBN27T1B7 |archive-date=2021-01-16 |url-status=live |date=13 November 2020}}

{{cite web |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/ethiopia-conflict-somalia-exclusive/exclusive-tigrayan-peacekeepers-in-somalia-disarmed-by-ethiopian-colleagues-sources-say-idUSKBN27Y1HF |title=Exclusive: Ethiopia says disarms Tigrayan peacekeepers in Somalia over security |last1=Houreld |first1=Katharine | website=Reuters |archive-url=https://archive.today/20210116031719/https://www.reuters.com/article/ethiopia-conflict-somalia-exclusive/exclusive-tigrayan-peacekeepers-in-somalia-disarmed-by-ethiopian-colleagues-sources-say-idUSKBN27Y1HF |archive-date=2021-01-16 |url-status=live |date=17 December 2020}}

{{cite news | url= https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/11/23/un-ethiopia-purging-tigrayan-officers-peacekeeping-missions/ |title=U.N. Fears Ethiopia Purging Ethnic Tigrayan Officers From Its Peacekeeping Missions | quote= The Ethiopian government has been rounding up ethnic Tigrayan security forces deployed in United Nations and African peacekeeping missions abroad and forcing them onto flights to the Ethiopian capital of Addis Ababa, where it is feared they may face torture or even execution, according to an internal U.N. account. |archive-url=https://archive.today/20210116033152/https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/11/23/un-ethiopia-purging-tigrayan-officers-peacekeeping-missions/ |archive-date=2021-01-16 |url-status=live | newspaper=Foreign Policy |date=23 November 2020}}

}}

Further reading

  • Baker, Al. "Judge Declines to Dismiss Case Alleging Racial Profiling by City Police in Street Stops." The New York Times. Nytimes.com, 31 August 2011. Web. 26 April 2012
  • {{cite book |last1=Baumgartner |first1=Frank R. |last2=Epp |first2=Derek A. |last3=Shoub |first3=Kelsey |date=July 10, 2018 |title=Suspect Citizens: What 20 Million Traffic Stops Tell Us About Policing and Race}}
  • Glaser, Jack. 2014. Suspect Race: Causes and Consequences of Racial Profiling (Oxford University Press)
  • Hadden, Sally. 2021. “Police and Slave Patrols,” in Jones, Ben, and Eduardo Mendieta, eds. The Ethics of Policing. New York University Press. 205–221.
  • {{cite book |last=Kaufmann |first=Mareile |title=Ethnic profiling and counter-terrorism : examples of European practice and possible repercussions |date=2010 |publisher=LIT Verlag |location=Berlin |isbn=978-3-64-310447-2}}
  • {{cite news |last=Kocieniewski |first=David |date=2000-11-29 |title=New Jersey Argues That the U.S. Wrote the Book on Race Profiling |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/29/nyregion/new-jersey-argues-that-the-us-wrote-the-book-on-race-profiling.html |work=New York Times |access-date=30 September 2018}}
  • Michal Tamir, "Racial Profiling – Who is the Executioner and Does he have a Face?" 15 Texas Hispanic Journal of Law and Policy (2009) 71–9.
  • {{cite journal | last1 = Ruiz | first1 = James | last2 = Julseth | first2 = Jason W. | last3 = Winters | first3 = Kathleen H. | year = 2010 | title = Profiling, Cajun Style: The FBI Investigation?. | journal = International Journal of Police Science & Management | volume = 12 | issue = 3| pages = 401–425 | doi=10.1350/ijps.2010.12.3.173| s2cid = 143646245 }}
  • {{cite journal | last1 = Ryberg | first1 = Jesper | year = 2011 | title = Racial Profiling And Criminal Justice | journal = Journal of Ethics | volume = 15 | issue = 1/2| pages = 79–88 | doi=10.1007/s10892-010-9098-3| s2cid = 143762533 }}
  • Shantz, Jeff. 2010. Racial Profiling and Borders: International, Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Lake Mary: Vandeplas).
  • Weitzer, Ronald; Tuch, Steven. 2006. Race and Policing in America: Conflict and Reform (New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • Wotherspoon, Terry, and John Hansen. 2019. [https://books.google.com/books?id=5emVDwAAQBAJ&dq=Wotherspoon%2C+Terry%2C+and+John+Hansen.+2019.+Racial+Profiling+and+Reconciliation.+Appearance+Bias+and+Crime.&pg=PA75 Racial Profiling and Reconciliation.] Appearance Bias and Crime. Retrieved 30 July 2024.
  • Wortley, Scot and Julian Tanner. 2004. [https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=45f313946703ae7f3fa0d86c109a173a8e890139 "Discrimination or 'good' policing? The racial profiling debate in Canada."] Our Diverse Cities. p. 197-201. Retrieved 30 July 2024.