Rees v Sinclair

{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}}

{{refimprove|date=October 2014}}

{{Infobox court case

| name = Rees v Sinclair

| court = Court of Appeal of New Zealand

| date_filed =

| image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg

| date decided = 3 October 1973

| full name = Rees v Sinclair

| citations = [1974] 1 NZLR 180

| judges = McCarthy P, MacArthur J, Beattie J

| prior actions =

| subsequent actions =

| opinions =

| transcripts =

| Keywords = negligence

}}

Rees v Sinclair [1974] 1 NZLR 180 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding liability for negligence against lawyers.{{cite book |title=Butterworths Student Companion Torts |edition=4th |last1=McLay |first1=Geoff |publisher=LexisNexis |ISBN=0-408-71686-X|year=2003 |page=}} It effectively reinforced the English case of Rondel v Worsley into New Zealand case law.