Ronald Coase

File:Coase scan 10 edited.jpg

Ronald Harry Coase was born in Willesden, a suburb of London, on 29 December 1910. His father, Henry Joseph Coase (1884–1973) was a telegraphist for the post office, as was his mother, Rosalie Elizabeth Coase (née Giles; 1882–1972), before marriage.{{cite book |chapter=Coase, Ronald Harry |title= Who's Who in America 2000, Millennium Edition |place= New Providence, NJ |publisher=Marquis Who's Who |year=1999 |volume= I (A–K)|page=[https://archive.org/details/whoswhoinamerica100chic/page/890/mode/2up?view=theater 891] |edition=54th |url= https://archive.org/details/whoswhoinamerica100chic/ |url-access=registration |isbn= 0-8379-0200-2 |via= Internet Archive |access-date= 16 July 2023}}{{cite book |chapter=COASE, Ronald Harry |title=The International Who's Who |edition= 70th |place= London & New York |publisher=Routledge |year= 2006 |page=[https://archive.org/details/internationalwho0000unse_m8w3/page/406/mode/2up?view=theater 406] |url= https://archive.org/details/internationalwho0000unse_m8w3/page/n5/mode/2up?view=theater |url-access = registration |isbn= 1-85743-366-1 |accessdate= 16 July 2023}}{{cite book |chapter=Coase, Prof. Ronald Harry |title=Who's Who 2007: An Annual Biographical Dictionary |edition= 159 |url=https://archive.org/details/whoswho20010000unse/page/n5/mode/2up |url-access= registration |page= [https://archive.org/details/whoswho2007whosw0000blac/page/447/mode/2up?view=theater 447] |place=London |publisher=A & C Black |year= 2007|isbn=978-0-7136-7526-9 |via= Internet Archive |accessdate= 16 July 2023}} As a child, Coase had a weakness in his legs, for which he was required to wear leg-irons. Due to this problem, he attended the school for physical defectives. At the age of 12, he was able to enter Kilburn Grammar School on scholarship. At Kilburn, he studied for the intermediate examination of the University of London as an external student in 1927–29.{{cite web| url = http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1991/coase-autobio.html| title = Ronald Coase. "Nobel Prize Autobiography," 1991}}Breit, William and Barry T. Hirsch. Lives of the Laureates, 4th ed. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 2004.

Coase then continued his studies at the University of London, enrolling as an internal student of the London School of Economics, where he took courses with Arnold Plant and received a Bachelor of Commerce degree in 1932. During his undergraduate studies, Coase received the Sir Ernest Cassel Travelling Scholarship which he used to visit the University of Chicago in 1931–1932 studying with Frank Knight and Jacob Viner. Coase's colleagues would later admit that they did not remember this first visit.{{cite journal |journal=Journal of Law and Economics |last=Kitch |first=Edmund W. |title=The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932–1970 |volume=26 |issue=1 |year=1983 |pages=163–234 |jstor=725189|doi=10.1086/467030 |s2cid=153525815 }} Between 1932 and 1934, Coase was an assistant lecturer at the Dundee School of Economics and Commerce, which later became part of the University of Dundee. Subsequently, Coase was an assistant lecturer in commerce at the University of Liverpool between 1934 and 1935 before returning to London School of Economics as a member of staff until 1951 in which year he was awarded an earned doctorate in economics from the University of London. He then started to work at the University at Buffalo and retained his British citizenship after moving to the United States in the 1950s.{{Cite web|url=http://alb.merlinone.net/mweb/wmsql.wm.request?oneimage&imageid=5579499%2F|title=U. of Chicago Professor Wins Nobel Economics Prize|access-date=17 March 2011|archive-date=28 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200228213928/https://alb.merlinone.net/scripts/foxIsapi.dLL/wmsql.wm.request?oneimage&imageid=5579499%2F|url-status=dead}} In 1958, he moved to the University of Virginia. Coase settled at the University of Chicago in 1964 and became the co-editor of the Journal of Law and Economics with Aaron Director.{{Cite web|url=http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/04/040913.director.shtml|title=Aaron Director, Founder of the field of Law and Economics|website=www-news.uchicago.edu|access-date=7 September 2019}} He was also for a time a trustee of the Philadelphia Society.{{cite web |url=http://phillysoc.org/trustees.htm |title=Trustees |publisher=Phillysoc.org |access-date=3 September 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827033031/http://phillysoc.org/trustees.htm |archive-date=27 August 2013}} He received the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1991.

File:Grave of Ronald Coase (1910–2013) at Graceland Cemetery, Chicago.jpg

Nearing his 100th birthday, Coase was working on a book concerning the rise of the economies of China and Vietnam.{{Cite web |url=http://english.vietnamnet.vn/spf/201003/99yearold-economist-researches-the-rise-of-China-and-Vietnam-900486/ |title=99-year-old economist researches the rise of China and Vietnam |date=24 March 2010 |work=VietNamNet Bridge |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100903162312/http://english.vietnamnet.vn/spf/201003/99yearold-economist-researches-the-rise-of-China-and-Vietnam-900486/ |archive-date=3 September 2010}} In an interview, Coase explained the mission of the Coase China Society and his vision of economics and the part to be played by Chinese economists.{{Cite web |url=http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/coase-china-society-interviews-ronald-coase |title=Coase China Society Interviews Ronald Coase |date=3 January 2011 |work=Chicago University Law School}}{{Cite web |url=http://english.unirule.org.cn/Html/Unirule-News/20110101130956819.html |title=Interview with Professor Ronald Coase |date=3 January 2011 |work=Unirule Institute of Economics |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110117184354/http://english.unirule.org.cn/Html/Unirule-News/20110101130956819.html |archive-date=17 January 2011}} This became "How China Became Capitalist" (2012) co-authored with Ning Wang. Coase was honoured and received an honorary doctorate from the university at Buffalo Department of Economics in May 2012.http://economics.buffalo.edu/ Robert Coase Honorary Doctorate

Coase married Marian Ruth Hartung of Chicago, Illinois in Willesden, England, 7 August 1937. Although they were unable to have children, they were married 75 years until her death on 17 October 2012, making him one of the longest-married Nobel Prize laureates.{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/sep/04/ronald-coase|title=Ronald Coase obituary|last=Littlewood|first=Mark|date=4 September 2013|newspaper=The Guardian|language=en|access-date=9 September 2018}}{{cite news |title=Ronald H. Coase, a Law Professor And Leading Economist, Dies at 102 |newspaper=The New York Times |first=Patrick J. |last=Lyons |date=3 September 2013 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/04/business/economy/ronald-h-coase-nobel-winning-economist-dies-at-102.html?_r=0}} Coase himself died in Chicago on 2 September 2013, at the age of 102.{{cite web |last=Galer |first=Sarah |url=http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/coaseinmemoriam |title=Ronald H. Coase, Founding Scholar in Law and Economics, 1910–2013 |publisher=University of Chicago Law School |website=Law.uchicago.edu |access-date=3 September 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130905071516/http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/coaseinmemoriam |archive-date=5 September 2013}} Both are buried at Graceland Cemetery in Chicago.

He was praised across the political spectrum, with Slate calling him "one of the most distinguished economists in the world"{{cite web |title=Ronald Coase, the Economist Who Explained Why We Have Companies |first=Matthew |last=Yglesias |website=Slate|date=3 September 2013 |url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/09/03/ronald_coase_s_theory_of_the_firm.html}} and Forbes calling him "the greatest of the many great University of Chicago economists".{{cite web |title=Ronald Coase Was The Greatest of the Many Great University of Chicago Economists |first=Fred |last=Smith |work=Forbes |date=3 September 2013 |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/fredsmith/2013/09/03/ronald-coase-was-the-greatest-of-the-many-great-university-of-chicago-economists/}} The Washington Post called his work over eight decades "impossible to summarize" while recommending five of his papers to read.{{cite news |title=Ronald Coase is dead. Here are five of his papers you need to read. |first=Dylan |last=Matthews |date=3 September 2013 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/09/03/ronald-coase-is-dead-here-are-five-of-his-papers-you-need-to-read/|newspaper=The Washington Post}}

{{Main|The Nature of the Firm}}

In "The Nature of the Firm" (1937), a brief but highly influential essay, Coase attempts to explain why the economy features a number of business firms instead of consisting exclusively of a multitude of independent, self-employed people who contract with one another. Given that "production could be carried on without any organization [that is, firms] at all", Coase asks, why and under what conditions should we expect firms to emerge?

Since modern firms can only emerge when an entrepreneur of some sort begins to hire people, Coase's analysis proceeds by considering the conditions under which it makes sense for an entrepreneur to seek hired help instead of contracting out for some particular task.

The traditional economic theory of the time (in the tradition of Adam Smith) suggested that, because the market is "efficient" (that is, those who are best at providing each good or service most cheaply are already doing so), it should always be cheaper to contract out than to hire.

Coase noted, however, a number of transaction costs involved in using the market; the cost of obtaining a good or service via the market actually exceeds the price of the good. Other costs, including search and information costs, bargaining costs, keeping trade secrets, and policing and enforcement costs, can all potentially add to the cost of procuring something from another party. This suggests that firms will arise which can internalise the production of goods and services required to deliver a product, thus avoiding these costs. This argument sets the stage for the later contributions by Oliver Williamson: markets and hierarchies are alternative co-ordination mechanisms for economic transactions.Hein Schreuder, "Coase, Hayek and Hierarchy", In: S. Lindenberg & Hein Schreuder, editors, Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Organization Studies, Pergamon Press{{Cite book|last=Knight|first=Jack|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VeoKtu_22q0C|title=Institutions and Social Conflict|date=1992|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-42189-8|page=12|language=en}}

There is a natural limit to what a firm can produce internally, however. Coase notices "decreasing returns to the entrepreneur function", including increasing overhead costs and increasing propensity for an overwhelmed manager to make mistakes in resource allocation. These factors become countervailing costs to the use of the firm.

Coase argues that the size of a firm (as measured by how many contractual relations are "internal" to the firm and how many "external") is a result of finding an optimal balance between the competing tendencies of the costs outlined above. In general, making the firm larger will initially be advantageous, but the decreasing returns indicated above will eventually kick in, preventing the firm from growing indefinitely.

Other things being equal, therefore, a firm will tend to be larger:

• the lower the costs of organising and the slower these costs rise with an increase in the number of transactions organised
• the less likely the entrepreneur is to make mistakes and the smaller the increase in mistakes with an increase in the transactions organised
• the greater the lowering (or the smaller the rise) in the supply price of factors of production to firms of larger size

The first two costs will increase with the spatial distribution of the transactions organised and the dissimilarity of the transactions. This explains why firms tend to either be in different geographic locations or to perform different functions. Additionally, technology changes that mitigate the cost of organising transactions across space may allow firms to become larger – the advent of the telephone and of cheap air travel, for example, would be expected to increase the size of firms.

A further exploration of the dichotomy between markets and hierarchies as co-ordination mechanisms for economic transactions derived a third alternative way called Commons based peer production, in which individuals successfully collaborate on large-scale projects following a diverse cluster of motivational drives and social signals.

{{Main|The Problem of Social Cost}}

File:Coase working 2000s.jpg

Upon publishing his article The Federal Communications Commission in 1959, Coase received negative feedback from the faculty at the University of Chicago over his conclusions and apparent conflicts with A. C. Pigou. According to Coase, "What I said was thought to run counter to Pigou's analysis by a number of economists at the University of Chicago and was therefore, according to them, wrong. At a meeting in Chicago I was able to convince these economists that I was right and Pigou's analysis faulty." Coase had presented his paper in 1960 during a seminar in Chicago, to twenty senior economist including George Stigler and Milton Friedman. He gradually won over the usually skeptic audience, in what has later been considered a "paradigm-shifting moment" in the genesis of Chicago Law and Economics.{{cite book |first=William |last=Davies |title=The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition |publisher=Sage |year=2014 |isbn= 978-1473905337|pages=87–90 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6119AwAAQBAJ&pg=PT87}} Coase would join the Chicago faculty four years later.

Published in the Journal of Law and Economics in 1960, while Coase was a member of the Economics department at the University of Virginia, "The Problem of Social Cost" provided the key insight that it is unclear where the blame for externalities lies. The example he gave was of a rancher whose cattle stray onto the cropland of his neighbour. If the rancher is made to restrict his cattle, he is harmed just as the farmer is if the cattle remain unrestrained.

Coase argued that without transaction costs the initial assignment of property rights makes no difference to whether or not the farmer and rancher can achieve the economically efficient outcome. If the cost of restraining cattle by, say, building a fence, is less than the cost of crop damage, the fence will be built. The initial assignment of property rights determines who builds the fence. If the farmer is responsible for the crop damage, the farmer will pay for the fence (as long the fence costs less than the crop damage). The allocation of property rights is primarily an equity issue, with consequences for the distribution of income and wealth, rather than an efficiency issue.

With sufficient transaction costs, initial property rights matter for both equity and efficiency. From the point of view of economic efficiency, property rights should be assigned such that the owner of the rights wants to take the economically efficient action. To elaborate, if it is efficient not to restrict the cattle, the rancher should be given the rights (so that cattle can move about freely), whereas if it is efficient to restrict the cattle, the farmer should be given the rights over the movement of the cattle (so the cattle are restricted).

This seminal argument forms the basis of the famous Coase theorem as labelled by Stigler.

In 1990, Coase wrote that he feared "The Problem of Social Cost" had been widely misunderstood.[https://www.law.uchicago.edu/lawecon/coaseinmemoriam/problemofsocialcost The Problem of Social Cost] University of Chicago Law School

File:Coase profile 2003.jpg

Though trained as an economist, Coase spent much of his career working in a law school. He is a central figure in the development of the subfield of law and economics. He viewed law and economics as having two parts, the first "using the economists' approach and concepts to analyze the working of the legal system, often called the economic analysis of the law"; and the second "a study of the influence of the legal system on the working of the economic system." Coase said that the second part "is the part of law and economics in which I am most interested."

In his Simons Lecture celebrating the centennial of the University of Chicago, titled "Law and Economics at Chicago", Coase noted that he only accidentally wandered into the field:

{{Blockquote | text = It is generally agreed that this article has had an immense influence on legal scholarship, but this was no part of my intention. For me, 'The Problem of Social Cost' was an essay in economics. It was aimed at economists. What I wanted to do was to improve our analysis of the working of the economic system. Law came into article because, in a regime of positive transaction costs, the character of the law becomes one of the main factors determining the performance of the economy. If transaction costs were zero (as is assumed in standard economic theory) we can imagine people contracting around the law whenever the value of production would be increased by a change in the legal position. But in a regime of positive transaction costs, such contracting would not occur whenever transaction costs were greater than the gain that such a redistribution of rights would bring. As a consequence the rights which individuals possess will commonly be those established by the law, which in these circumstances can be said to control the economy. As I have said, in 'The Problem of Social Cost' I had no intention of making a contribution to legal scholarship. I referred to legal cases because they afforded examples of real situations as against the imaginary ones normally used by economists in their analysis. It was undoubtedly an economist who invented the widget. But in 'The Problem of Social Cost' I did something else. I pointed out that the judges in their opinions often seemed to show a better understanding of the economic problem than did many economists even though their views were not always expressed in a very explicit fashion. I did this not to praise the judges but to shame economists.}}

Despite wandering accidentally into law and economics, the opportunity to edit the Journal of Law and Economics was instrumental in bringing him to the University of Chicago:

{{Blockquote| text = [W]hen I was approached to fill Aaron Director's place on his retirement, what I found most attractive about coming to Chicago was the opportunity it gave me of editing the Journal. Indeed, it is probable that without the Journal I would not have come to Chicago. I knew nothing of the original aim of the Journal. What I wanted to do was to encourage the type of research which I had advocated in 'The Problem of Social Cost', and I used my editorship of the Journal as a means of bringing this about.{{cite journal |title=Law and Economics at Chicago |last=Coase |first=R. H. |journal=Journal of Law and Economics |volume=36 |issue=1 |year=1993 |pages=239–254 |jstor=725475|doi=10.1086/467274 |s2cid=153402423 }}}}

Coase believed that the University of Chicago was the intellectual center of law and economics. He concluded his Simons lecture by stating:

I am very much aware that, in concentrating in this lecture on law and economics at Chicago, I have neglected other significant contributions to the subject made elsewhere such as those by Guido Calabresi at Yale, by Donald Turner at Harvard, and by others. But it can hardly be denied that in the emergence of the subject of law and economics, Chicago has played a very significant part and one of which the University can be proud.

In law and economics, the Coase theorem ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|k|oʊ|s}}) describes the economic efficiency of an economic allocation or outcome in the presence of externalities. The theorem states that if trade in an externality is possible and there are sufficiently low transaction costs, bargaining will lead to a Pareto efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of property. In practice, obstacles to bargaining or poorly defined property rights can prevent Coasean bargaining. This 'theorem' is commonly attributed to Coase.

Another important contribution of Coase is the Coase conjecture, which is an informal argument that durable goods monopolists do not have market power because they are unable to commit to not lowering their prices in future periods.

When asked what he considered his politics to be, Coase stated,

I really don't know. I don't reject any policy without considering what its results are. If someone says there's going to be regulation, I don't say that regulation will be bad. Let's see. What we discover is that most regulation does produce, or has produced in recent times, a worse result. But I wouldn't like to say that all regulation would have this effect because one can think of circumstances in which it doesn't.{{cite magazine |title=Looking for results |magazine=Reason magazine |url=http://reason.com/archives/1997/01/01/looking-for-results/1|date=January 1997 }}

Coase admitted that early in life, he aligned himself with socialism.

{{Blockquote |text = As a young man I was a Socialist. The first challenge to this belief came when, in 1931, 5 months before I took the final examinations for the B.Com. degree, I attended Arnold Plant's seminar at the London School of Economics (LSE). He introduced me to Adam Smith's invisible hand and to the advantages of a competitive system. He also pointed out that government schemes in the economic sphere were often ill-conceived and were introduced to placate special interests. I adopted many of Plant's positions but continued to regard myself as a Socialist. That this meant holding what could be considered, and were, inconsistent positions was not unusual at that time. Abba Lerner, a fellow student and a fine theorist, with whom I had a very friendly relation, also believed in the virtues of a competitive system but was even more attached to Socialism than I was.{{cite journal |title=Law and Economics and A.W. Brian Simpson |first=R. H. |last=Coase |journal=Journal of Legal Studies |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=103–119 |jstor=724523 |date=1996|doi=10.1086/467973 |s2cid=146511123 }}}}

Guido Calabresi wrote that Coase's focus on transaction costs in The Nature of the Firm was the result of his socialist beliefs. Reflecting on this, Coase wrote: "It is very difficult to know where one's ideas come from but for all I know he may well be right." Coase continued:

{{Blockquote | text = My socialist sympathies gradually fell away and this process was accentuated as a result of being assigned in 1935 at LSE the course on the Economics of Public Utilities. I soon found out that very little was known about British public utilities and I set about making a series of historical studies on the water, gas, and electricity supply industries and of the Post Office and broadcasting.

These researches taught me much about the public utility industries and they certainly made me aware of the defects of government operation of these industries, whether municipal or through nationalisation. These researches were interrupted by the war, when I joined the civil service, at first, for a short period, in the Forestry Commission, then responsible for timber production, and for the rest of the war, in the Central Statistical Office, one of the offices of the War Cabinet. This war-time experience did not significantly influence my views but I could not help noticing that, with the country in mortal danger and despite the leadership of Winston Churchill, government departments often seemed more concerned to defend their own interests than those of the country.}}

Coase was research advisor to the Ronald Coase Institute, an organisation that promotes research on institutions and organizations – the laws, rules, customs, and norms – that govern real economic systems, with particular support for young scholars from developing and transitional countries.

File:Coase b&w2.jpg]]

The University of Chicago Law School carries on the legacy of Ronald Coase through the mission of the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics. Each year, the University of Chicago Law School hosts the Coase Lecture, which was delivered in 2003 by Ronald Coase himself.{{Cite web |last=Coase |first=2003 Coase Lecture: Ronald |last2=Present |first2="The |last3=Law |first3=Future of |last4=Economics" |date=2009-07-06 |title=2003 Coase Lecture: Ronald Coase, "The Present and Future of Law and Economics" {{!}} University of Chicago Law School |url=https://www.law.uchicago.edu/events/2003-coase-lecture-ronald-coase-present-and-future-law-and-economics |access-date=2023-12-22 |website=www.law.uchicago.edu |language=en}}

• {{Cite journal |doi=10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x |year=1937 |title=The Nature of the Firm |journal=Economica |volume=4 |issue=16 |pages=386–405 |title-link=The Nature of the Firm |last1=Coase |first1=R. H. }}
• {{Cite journal |doi=10.1086/466560 |year=1960 |title=The Problem of Social Cost |journal=Journal of Law and Economics |volume=3 |issue=1 |pages=1–44 |title-link=The Problem of Social Cost |last1=Coase |first1=R. H. |s2cid=222331226 }}
• {{Cite journal |doi=10.1086/466731 |title=Durability and Monopoly |journal=Journal of Law and Economics |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=143–149 |year=1972 |last1=Coase |first1=R. H. |s2cid=155011558 }}
• {{Cite journal |title=The Lighthouse in Economics |journal=Journal of Law and Economics |year=1974 |volume=17 |issue=2 |pages=357–376 |doi=10.1086/466796 |title-link=The Lighthouse in Economics |last1=Coase |first1=R. H. |s2cid=153715526 }}
• {{cite book |last= Coase |first= R. H. |year= 1988 |title= The Firm the Market and the Law |place= Chicago |publisher= The University of Chicago Press |url= https://archive.org/details/firmmarketlaw00coas/page/n3/mode/2up |url-access= registration |isbn=0226111016}}
• {{Cite journal |title=The Institutional Structure of Production |journal=American Economic Review |volume=82 |issue=4 |pages=713–719 |year=1992 |jstor=2117340|last1=Coase |first1=R. H. }} (Nobel Prize lecture)
• {{cite book |last= Coase |first= R. H. |year= 1994 |title= Essays on Economics and Economists |place= Chicago |publisher= The University of Chicago Press |url= https://archive.org/details/essaysoneconomic0000coas/page/n3/mode/2up |url-access= registration |isbn=0226111032}}
• {{cite journal |title=The Acquisition of Fisher Body By General Motors |journal=The Journal of Law & Economics |volume=43 |issue=1 |year=2000 |pages=15–32 |doi=10.1086/467446 |last1=Coase |first1=Ronald |jstor=10.1086/467446 |s2cid=154712364 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/467446|url-access=subscription }}
• {{cite journal |title=The Conduct of Economics: The Example of Fisher Body and General Motors |journal=Journal of Economics & Management Strategy |volume=15 |issue=2 |year=2006 |pages=255–278 |doi=10.1111/j.1530-9134.2006.00100.x |last1=Coase |first1=Ronald |citeseerx=10.1.1.424.5083 |s2cid=154100464 }}
• {{cite journal |title=The Industrial Structure of Production: A Research Agenda for Innovation in an Entrepreneurial Economy |first1=Ronald |last1=Coase |first2=Ning |last2=Wang |journal=Entrepreneurship Research Journal |volume=2 |issue=1 |year=2011 |doi=10.2202/2157-5665.1026|s2cid=154727631 }}
• {{cite book |title= How China Became Capitalist |year= 2012 |author1= Coase, Ronald |author2= Ning Wang |publisher= Palgrave Macmillan |url = https://archive.org/details/howchinabecameca0000coas/page/n5/mode/2up |url-access= registration |isbn= 978-1137019363}}.

{{Portal|Conservatism|Economics|Libertarianism|Politics}}

• Government failure
• Horizontal integration
• List of think tanks
• Vertical integration

{{reflist}}

• {{cite book|last=MacKenzie |first=Douglas |editor-first=Ronald |editor-last=Hamowy |editor-link=Ronald Hamowy |title=The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism |chapter=Coase, Ronald H. (1910– ) |chapter-url=https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/libertarianism/n48.xml|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yxNgXs3TkJYC |year=2008 |publisher=Sage; Cato Institute |location=Thousand Oaks, CA |doi=10.4135/9781412965811.n48 |isbn=978-1412965804 |oclc=750831024 |lccn=2008009151 |pages=73–74 }}

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374337555_Ronald_Coase_in_the_French_Wikipedia

{{wikiquote}}

• [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpBb14SRMTc A video of Coase talking about law and economics]
• {{Nobelprize}}
• {{cite book|url=http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/Coase.html|title=The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics| entry=Ronald H. Coase 1910-2013|edition=2nd|series=Library of Economics and Liberty|publisher=Liberty Fund|year=2008}}
• [http://ssrn.com/abstract=732483 "Wireless Communications and Computing at a Crossroads"], Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 205, 239
• [http://coase.org/ Coase Institute]
• [http://www.reason.com/news/show/30115.html "Looking for Results"], interview in Reason by Thomas W. Hazlett
• [http://webcast-law.uchicago.edu/2003/17_Coase_Lecture.mov 2003 Coase Centennial Speech delivered by Coase] (500MB QuickTime video file)
• [https://www.economist.com/node/17730360?story_id=17730360&CFID=157315775&CFTOKEN=39244204 "Why do Firms Exist?"], Schumpeter, The Economist, 2010.
• [http://www.econtalk.org/archives/_featuring/ronald_coase/ Russ Roberts's "Coase on Externalities, the Firm, and the State of Economics"] from the Library of Economics and Liberty
• [http://www.trubeta.com/#!coase/mainPage No Cheap Victories – Last Interview and Tribute]
• [https://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2013/09/ronald-coase-and-the-misuse-of-economics.html Ronald Coase and the Misuse of Economics by John Cassidy], The New Yorker, 2013
• {{Google Scholar id|pOCX2hcAAAAJ}}
• {{Internet Archive author ||sname= Ronald Coase}}
• [https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.COASER Guide to the Ronald H. Coase Papers 1805–2013] at the [https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/scrc/ University of Chicago Special Collections Research Center]

{{s-start}}

{{s-ach|aw}}

{{s-bef|before=Harry M. Markowitz|before2=Merton H. Miller|before3=William F. Sharpe}}

{{s-ttl|title=Laureate of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics|years=1991}}

{{s-aft|after=Gary S. Becker}}

{{s-end}}

{{Instecon}}

{{Chicago school economists}}

{{Nobel laureates in economics 1976–2000}}

{{1991 Nobel Prize winners}}

{{Property navbox}}

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Coase, Ronald}}

Category:1910 births

Category:2013 deaths

Category:Alumni of University of London Worldwide

Category:Alumni of the University of London

Category:Alumni of the London School of Economics

Category:English business theorists

Category:British economics writers

Category:Law and economics scholars

Category:Historians of economic thought

Category:Nobel laureates in Economics

Category:People educated at Kilburn Grammar School

Category:People from Willesden

Category:University at Buffalo faculty

Category:University of Chicago faculty

Category:University of Virginia faculty

Category:British men centenarians

Category:University of Virginia alumni

Category:English Nobel laureates

Category:British Nobel laureates

Category:20th-century English historians

Category:20th-century English male writers

Category:21st-century English historians

Category:20th-century British economists

Category:21st-century British economists

Category:New institutional economists

Category:Environmental economists

Category:Cato Institute people

Category:Academics of the University of Dundee

Category:Fellows of the Earhart Foundation

Category:Distinguished fellows of the American Economic Association

Category:Academics of the London School of Economics

Category:Corresponding fellows of the British Academy

Category:Chicago School economists

Category:Member of the Mont Pelerin Society

Category:Burials at Graceland Cemetery (Chicago)