Spacecraft propulsion#Speculative methods

{{short description|Method used to accelerate spacecraft}}

{{multiple issues|

{{more science citations needed|date=July 2023}}

{{Excessive examples|date=July 2023}}

}}

File:Shuttle Main Engine Test Firing.jpg during a test firing at the John C. Stennis Space Center in Hancock County, Mississippi.]]

File:Engine of APOLLO Eagle.png engines of the Apollo Lunar Module reaction control system (RCS)]]

Spacecraft propulsion is any method used to accelerate spacecraft and artificial satellites. In-space propulsion exclusively deals with propulsion systems used in the vacuum of space and should not be confused with space launch or atmospheric entry.

Several methods of pragmatic spacecraft propulsion have been developed, each having its own drawbacks and advantages. Most satellites have simple reliable chemical thrusters (often monopropellant rockets) or resistojet rockets for orbital station-keeping, while a few use momentum wheels for attitude control. Russian and antecedent Soviet bloc satellites have used electric propulsion for decades,{{Cite web|url=http://fluid.ippt.gov.pl/sbarral/hall.html|title=Electric Propulsion Research at Institute of Fundamental Technological Research|date=16 August 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110816154150/http://fluid.ippt.gov.pl/sbarral/hall.html|archive-date=16 August 2011}} and newer Western geo-orbiting spacecraft are starting to use them for north–south station-keeping and orbit raising. Interplanetary vehicles mostly use chemical rockets as well, although a few have used electric propulsion such as ion thrusters and Hall-effect thrusters. Various technologies need to support everything from small satellites and robotic deep space exploration to space stations and human missions to Mars.

Hypothetical in-space propulsion technologies describe propulsion technologies that could meet future space science and exploration needs. These propulsion technologies are intended to provide effective exploration of the Solar System and may permit mission designers to plan missions to "fly anytime, anywhere, and complete a host of science objectives at the destinations" and with greater reliability and safety. With a wide range of possible missions and candidate propulsion technologies, the question of which technologies are "best" for future missions is a difficult one; expert opinion now holds that a portfolio of propulsion technologies should be developed to provide optimum solutions for a diverse set of missions and destinations.{{cite web |url=http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/501329main_TA02-ID_rev3-NRC-wTASR.pdf |title=In-space propulsion systems roadmap |last=Meyer |first=Mike |date=April 2012 |website=nasa.gov |access-date=Feb 1, 2021 |page=9 |archive-date=October 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/501329main_TA02-ID_rev3-NRC-wTASR.pdf |url-status=dead }}Mason, Lee S. "[http://www.mdcampbell.com/Mason2006.pdf A practical approach to starting fission surface power development.]" proceedings of International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP'06), American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois, 2006b, paper. Vol. 6297. 2006.{{cite news |last=Leone |first=Dan |date=May 20, 2013 |title=NASA Banking on Solar Electric Propulsion's Slow but Steady Push |url=http://www.spacenews.com/article/civil-space/35395space-technology-and-innovation-nasa-banking-on-solar-electric-propulsion%E2%80%99s |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130720074025/http://www.spacenews.com/article/civil-space/35395space-technology-and-innovation-nasa-banking-on-solar-electric-propulsion%E2%80%99s |archive-date=July 20, 2013 |access-date=February 1, 2021 |newspaper=Space News |publisher=SpaceNews, Inc}}

Purpose and function

{{more citations needed section | date = July 2023}}

Space exploration is about reaching the destination safely (mission enabling), quickly (reduced transit times), with a large quantity of payload mass, and relatively inexpensively (lower cost). The act of reaching the destination requires an in-space propulsion system, and the other metrics are modifiers to this fundamental action.{{Sfn|Meyer|2012|p=5}} Propulsion technologies can significantly improve a number of critical aspects of the mission.

When launching a spacecraft from Earth, a propulsion method must overcome a higher gravitational pull to provide a positive net acceleration.{{cite web |last=Benson |first=Tom |title=Guided Tours: Beginner's Guide to Rockets |url=http://exploration.grc.nasa.gov/education/rocket/guided.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130814022045/http://exploration.grc.nasa.gov/education/rocket/guided.htm |archive-date=2013-08-14 |access-date=2007-08-02 |publisher=NASA}} When in space, the purpose of a propulsion system is to change the velocity, or v, of a spacecraft.{{cite web |last=Zobel |first=Edward A. |year=2006 |title=Summary of Introductory Momentum Equations |url=http://id.mind.net/~zona/mstm/physics/mechanics/momentum/introductoryProblems/momentumSummary2.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927025532/http://id.mind.net/~zona/mstm/physics/mechanics/momentum/introductoryProblems/momentumSummary2.html |archive-date=September 27, 2007 |access-date=2007-08-02 |publisher=Zona Land}}

In-space propulsion begins where the upper stage of the launch vehicle leaves off, performing the functions of primary propulsion, reaction control, station keeping, precision pointing, and orbital maneuvering. The main engines used in space provide the primary propulsive force for orbit transfer, planetary trajectories, and extra planetary landing and ascent. The reaction control and orbital maneuvering systems provide the propulsive force for orbit maintenance, position control, station keeping, and spacecraft attitude control.{{Sfn|Meyer|2012|p=5}}

In orbit, any additional impulse, even tiny, will result in a change in the orbit path, in two ways:{{cite web | title=In-Space Propulsion Technology Products for NASA's Future Science and Exploration Missions | url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110016163/downloads/20110016163.pdf | access-date=2024-08-03}}

  • Prograde/retrograde (i.e. acceleration in the tangential/opposite in tangential direction), which increases/decreases altitude of orbit.
  • Perpendicular to orbital plane, which changes orbital inclination.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}}

Earth's surface is situated fairly deep in a gravity well; the escape velocity required to leave its orbit is 11.2 kilometers/second.{{Cite web |date=2024-02-23 |title=Escape velocity {{!}} Definition, Formula, Earth, Moon, & Facts {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/science/escape-velocity |access-date=2024-04-20 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}} Thus for destinations beyond, propulsion systems need enough propellant and to be of high enough efficiency. The same is true for other planets and moons, albeit some have lower gravity wells.

As human beings evolved in a gravitational field of "one g" (9.81m/s²), it would be most comfortable for a human spaceflight propulsion system to provide that acceleration continuously,{{according to whom|date = July 2023}} (though human bodies can tolerate much larger accelerations over short periods).{{Cite web |title=The Jump to Light Speed Is a Real Killer |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/star-wars-science-light-speed/ |access-date=2024-04-20 |website=Scientific American |language=en}} The occupants of a rocket or spaceship having such a propulsion system would be free from the ill effects of free fall, such as nausea, muscular weakness, reduced sense of taste, or leaching of calcium from their bones.{{Cite journal |last1=Wolfe |first1=J. W. |last2=Rummel |first2=J. D. |date=1992 |title=Long-term effects of microgravity and possible countermeasures |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11536970/ |journal=Advances in Space Research |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=281–284 |doi=10.1016/0273-1177(92)90296-a |issn=0273-1177 |pmid=11536970|bibcode=1992AdSpR..12a.281W }}{{Cite journal |date=December 22, 2022 |title=Human Health during Space Travel: State-of-the-Art Review |pmc=9818606 |last1=Krittanawong |first1=C. |last2=Singh |first2=N. K. |last3=Scheuring |first3=R. A. |last4=Urquieta |first4=E. |last5=Bershad |first5=E. M. |last6=MacAulay |first6=T. R. |last7=Kaplin |first7=S. |last8=Dunn |first8=C. |last9=Kry |first9=S. F. |last10=Russomano |first10=T. |last11=Shepanek |first11=M. |last12=Stowe |first12=R. P. |last13=Kirkpatrick |first13=A. W. |last14=Broderick |first14=T. J. |last15=Sibonga |first15=J. D. |last16=Lee |first16=A. G. |last17=Crucian |first17=B. E. |journal=Cells |volume=12 |issue=1 |page=40 |doi=10.3390/cells12010040 |doi-access=free |pmid=36611835 }}

Theory

The Tsiolkovsky rocket equation shows, using the law of conservation of momentum, that for a rocket engine propulsion method to change the momentum of a spacecraft, it must change the momentum of something else in the opposite direction. In other words, the rocket must exhaust mass opposite the spacecraft's acceleration direction, with such exhausted mass called propellant or reaction mass.{{Cite book |last=Turner |first=Martin J. L. |title=Rocket and spacecraft propulsion: principles, practice and new developments |date=2009 |publisher=Praxis Publ |isbn=978-3-540-69202-7 |edition=3rd |series=Springer-Praxis books in astronautical engineering |location=Chichester, UK}}{{Rp|location=Sec 1.2.1}}{{Cite web |last=Tsiolkovsky |first=K. |title=Reactive Flying Machines |url=http://epizodsspace.airbase.ru/bibl/inostr-yazyki/tsiolkovskii/tsiolkovskii-nhedy-t2-1954.pdf}} For this to happen, both reaction mass and energy are needed. The impulse provided by launching a particle of reaction mass with mass m at velocity v is mv. But this particle has kinetic energy mv²/2, which must come from somewhere. In a conventional solid, liquid, or hybrid rocket, fuel is burned, providing the energy, and the reaction products are allowed to flow out of the engine nozzle, providing the reaction mass. In an ion thruster, electricity is used to accelerate ions behind the spacecraft. Here other sources must provide the electrical energy (e.g. a solar panel or a nuclear reactor), whereas the ions provide the reaction mass.

The rate of change of velocity is called acceleration and the rate of change of momentum is called force.{{Cite web |title=Momentum |url=https://pages.uoregon.edu/jschombe/glossary/momentum.html |access-date=2024-04-19 |website=pages.uoregon.edu}} To reach a given velocity, one can apply a small acceleration over a long period of time, or a large acceleration over a short time; similarly, one can achieve a given impulse with a large force over a short time or a small force over a long time. This means that for maneuvering in space, a propulsion method that produces tiny accelerations for a long time can often produce the same impulse as another which produces large accelerations for a short time.{{Cite web |title=Impulsive Maneuvers — Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics |url=https://orbital-mechanics.space/orbital-maneuvers/impulsive-maneuvers.html |access-date=2024-05-18 |website=orbital-mechanics.space}} However, when launching from a planet, tiny accelerations cannot overcome the planet's gravitational pull and so cannot be used.{{cite web|publisher=National Air and Space Museum| url=https://howthingsfly.si.edu/ask-an-explainer/how-much-force-rocket-launch | date=January 14, 2014 |access-date=September 7, 2024| title=Ask an Explainer: How much force is in a rocket launch?}}

Some designs however, operate without internal reaction mass by taking advantage of magnetic fields or light pressure to change the spacecraft's momentum.

= Efficiency =

When discussing the efficiency of a propulsion system, designers often focus on the effective use of the reaction mass, which must be carried along with the rocket and is irretrievably consumed when used.{{cite web| publisher=Embry Riddle Aeronautical University|url=https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/introductiontoaerospaceflightvehicles/chapter/rocket-engines/ | title=Introduction to Aerospace Flight Vehicles|date=January 2023 |access-date=September 7, 2024|quote=The shape and length of the combustion chamber and exit nozzle are essential design parameters for a rocket engine. The combustion chamber must be long enough for complete propellant combustion before the hot gases enter the nozzle, ensuring efficient combustion and maximizing thrust production. |last1=Leishman |first1=J. Gordon }} Spacecraft performance can be quantified in amount of change in momentum per unit of propellant consumed, also called specific impulse. This is a measure of the amount of impulse that can be obtained from a fixed amount of reaction mass. The higher the specific impulse, the better the efficiency. Ion propulsion engines have high specific impulse (~3000 s) and low thrust{{Cite web |title=Xenon Ion Propulsion System (XIPS) Thrusters |url=https://www2.l3t.com/edd/pdfs/datasheets/EP_Thrusters-XIPS_PPU%20Overview%20datasheet.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417143504/http://www2.l3t.com/edd/pdfs/datasheets/EP_Thrusters-XIPS_PPU%20Overview%20datasheet.pdf |archive-date=17 April 2018 |access-date=16 March 2019 |website=L3 Technologies}} whereas chemical rockets like monopropellant or bipropellant rocket engines have a low specific impulse (~300 s) but high thrust.{{Cite web |title=Chemical Bipropellant thruster family |url=http://www.space-propulsion.com/brochures/bipropellant-thrusters/bipropellant-thrusters.pdf |access-date=16 March 2019 |website=Ariane Group}}

The impulse per unit weight-on-Earth (typically designated by I_\text{sp}) has units of seconds. Because the weight on Earth of the reaction mass is often unimportant when discussing vehicles in space, specific impulse can also be discussed in terms of impulse per unit mass, with the same units as velocity (e.g., meters per second).{{Cite web |title=Specific Impulse |url=https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/specimp.html |access-date=May 18, 2024 |website=NASA}} This measure is equivalent to the effective exhaust velocity of the engine, and is typically designated v_{e}.{{Cite web |title=Chapter 3: Gravity & Mechanics – NASA Science |url=https://science.nasa.gov/learn/basics-of-space-flight/chapter3-2/ |access-date=2024-04-19 |website=science.nasa.gov |date=20 July 2023 |language=en-US}} Either the change in momentum per unit of propellant used by a spacecraft, or the velocity of the propellant exiting the spacecraft, can be used to measure its "specific impulse." The two values differ by a factor of the standard acceleration due to gravity, gn, 9.80665 m/s² (I_\text{sp} g_\mathrm{n} = v_{e}).{{Cite web |title=III.4.2.1: Rockets and Launch Vehicles |url=https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/III.4.2.1_Rockets_and_Launch_Vehicles.pdf |access-date=May 18, 2024 |website=www.faa.gov}}

In contrast to chemical rockets, electrodynamic rockets use

electric or magnetic fields to accelerate a charged propellant. The benefit of this method is that it can achieve exhaust velocities, and therefore I_\text{sp}, more than 10 times greater than those of a chemical engine, producing steady thrust with far less fuel. With a conventional chemical propulsion system, 2% of a rocket's total mass might make it to the destination, with the other 98% having been consumed as fuel. With an electric propulsion system, 70% of what's aboard in low Earth orbit can make it to a deep-space destination.{{Cite web|last=Boyle|first=Alan|date=2017-06-29|title=MSNW's plasma thruster just might fire up Congress at hearing on space propulsion|url=https://www.geekwire.com/2017/msnws-plasma-thruster-just-might-fire-congress-hearing-space-propulsion/|access-date=2021-08-15|website=GeekWire|language=en-US}}

However, there is a trade-off. Chemical rockets transform propellants into most of the energy needed to propel them, but their electromagnetic equivalents must carry or produce the power required to create and accelerate propellants. Because there are currently practical limits on the amount of power available on a spacecraft, these engines are not suitable for launch vehicles or when a spacecraft needs a quick, large

impulse, such as when it brakes to enter a capture orbit. Even so, because

electrodynamic rockets offer very high I_\text{sp}, mission planners are

increasingly willing to sacrifice power and thrust (and the extra time it will

take to get a spacecraft where it needs to go) in order to save large amounts

of propellant mass.

Operating domains

Spacecraft operate in many areas of space. These include orbital maneuvering, interplanetary travel, and interstellar travel.

=Orbital=

{{Main|Orbital mechanics}}

Artificial satellites are first launched into the desired altitude by conventional liquid/solid propelled rockets, after which the satellite may use onboard propulsion systems for orbital stationkeeping. Once in the desired orbit, they often need some form of attitude control so that they are correctly pointed with respect to the Earth, the Sun, and possibly some astronomical object of interest.{{cite news |author1=Hess, M. |author2=Martin, K. K. |author3=Rachul, L. J. | title=Thrusters Precisely Guide EO-1 Satellite in Space First | publisher=NASA | date=February 7, 2002 | url=http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/news-release/releases/2002/02-020.htm | access-date=2007-07-30 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071206154134/http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/news-release/releases/2002/02-020.htm |archive-date = 2007-12-06}} They are also subject to drag from the thin atmosphere, so that to stay in orbit for a long period of time some form of propulsion is occasionally necessary to make small corrections (orbital station-keeping).{{cite web |last=Phillips |first=Tony |date=May 30, 2000 |url=https://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast30may_1m.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000619105529/https://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast30may_1m.htm |archive-date=June 19, 2000 |title=Solar S'Mores |publisher=NASA |access-date=2007-07-30

}} Many satellites need to be moved from one orbit to another from time to time, and this also requires propulsion.{{cite web | last=Olsen | first=Carrie | date=September 21, 1995 | url=http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/rocket_sci/satellites/hohmann.html | title=Hohmann Transfer & Plane Changes | publisher=NASA | access-date=2007-07-30 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070715042552/http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/rocket_sci/satellites/hohmann.html |archive-date = 2007-07-15}} A satellite's useful life is usually over once it has exhausted its ability to adjust its orbit.{{Cite web |title=Satellite communication – Orbit, Signals, Relay {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/satellite-communication/How-satellites-work |access-date=2024-04-20 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}

=Interplanetary=

{{Main|Interplanetary spaceflight}}

For interplanetary travel, a spacecraft can use its engines to leave Earth's orbit. It is not explicitly necessary as the initial boost given by the rocket, gravity slingshot, monopropellant/bipropellent attitude control propulsion system are enough for the exploration of the solar system (see New Horizons). Once it has done so, it must make its way to its destination. Current interplanetary spacecraft do this with a series of short-term trajectory adjustments.{{cite web|author=Staff |date=April 24, 2007 |url=http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/odyssey/mission/cruise.html |title=Interplanetary Cruise |publisher=NASA |work=2001 Mars Odyssey |access-date=2007-07-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070802071234/http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/odyssey/mission/cruise.html |archive-date=August 2, 2007 }} In between these adjustments, the spacecraft typically moves along its trajectory without accelerating. The most fuel-efficient means to move from one circular orbit to another is with a Hohmann transfer orbit: the spacecraft begins in a roughly circular orbit around the Sun. A short period of thrust in the direction of motion accelerates or decelerates the spacecraft into an elliptical orbit around the Sun which is tangential to its previous orbit and also to the orbit of its destination. The spacecraft falls freely along this elliptical orbit until it reaches its destination, where another short period of thrust accelerates or decelerates it to match the orbit of its destination.{{cite news | first=Dave | last=Doody | title=Chapter 4. Interplanetary Trajectories | work=Basics of Space Flight | publisher=NASA JPL | date=February 7, 2002 | url=http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/bsf4-1.html | access-date=2007-07-30 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070717143018/http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/bsf4-1.html | archive-date=July 17, 2007 }} Special methods such as aerobraking or aerocapture are sometimes used for this final orbital adjustment.{{cite conference |last=Hoffman |first=S. |date=August 20–22, 1984 |title=A comparison of aerobraking and aerocapture vehicles for interplanetary missions |url=http://www.aiaa.org/content.cfm?pageid=406&gTable=mtgpaper&gID=44030 |conference= |location=Seattle, Washington |publisher=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics |pages= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927230504/http://www.aiaa.org/content.cfm?pageid=406&gTable=mtgpaper&gID=44030 |archive-date=September 27, 2007 |access-date=2007-07-31 |book-title=AIAA and AAS, Astrodynamics Conference}}

File:Ssunsail.jpg

Some spacecraft propulsion methods such as solar sails provide very low but inexhaustible thrust;{{cite web|author=Anonymous |year=2007 |url=http://www.planetary.org/programs/projects/innovative_technologies/solar_sailing/facts.html |title=Basic Facts on Cosmos 1 and Solar Sailing |publisher=The Planetary Society |access-date=2007-07-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070703052531/http://www.planetary.org/programs/projects/innovative_technologies/solar_sailing/facts.html |archive-date=July 3, 2007 }} an interplanetary vehicle using one of these methods would follow a rather different trajectory, either constantly thrusting against its direction of motion in order to decrease its distance from the Sun, or constantly thrusting along its direction of motion to increase its distance from the Sun.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} The concept has been successfully tested by the Japanese IKAROS solar sail spacecraft.{{cite web | last=Malik | first=Tariq | title=Japanese solar sail successfully rides sunlight | website=NBC News | date=2010-07-13 | url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna38222268 | access-date=2024-09-27}}

=Interstellar=

{{Main|Interstellar travel}}

Because interstellar distances are great, a tremendous velocity is needed to get a spacecraft to its destination in a reasonable amount of time. Acquiring such a velocity on launch and getting rid of it on arrival remains a formidable challenge for spacecraft designers.{{cite web | last=Rahls | first=Chuck | date=December 7, 2005 | url=http://www.physorg.com/news8817.html | title=Interstellar Spaceflight: Is It Possible? | publisher=Physorg.com | access-date=2007-07-31 }} No spacecraft capable of short duration (compared to human lifetime) interstellar travel has yet been built, but many hypothetical designs have been discussed.

Propulsion technology

Spacecraft propulsion technology can be of several types, such as chemical, electric or nuclear. They are distinguished based on the physics of the propulsion system and how thrust is generated. Other experimental and more theoretical types are also included, depending on their technical maturity. Additionally, there may be credible meritorious in-space propulsion concepts not foreseen or reviewed at the time of publication, and which may be shown to be beneficial to future mission applications.{{Sfn|Meyer|2012|p=10}}

Almost all types are reaction engines, which produce thrust by expelling reaction mass, in accordance with Newton's third law of motion.{{Cite web |title=AMT Handbook |url=https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/03_amtp_ch1.pdf |access-date=April 20, 2024 |website=www.faa.gov}}{{Cite web |title=Rocket Principles |url=https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/rocket/TRCRocket/rocket_principles.html |access-date=April 20, 2024 |website=NASA}}This law of motion is most commonly paraphrased as: "For every action force there is an equal, but opposite, reaction force."{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} Examples include jet engines, rocket engines, pump-jet, and more uncommon variations such as Hall–effect thrusters, ion drives, mass drivers, and nuclear pulse propulsion.{{Cite web |title=Chapter 11: Onboard Systems – NASA Science |url=https://science.nasa.gov/learn/basics-of-space-flight/chapter11-4/ |access-date=2024-04-19 |website=science.nasa.gov |date=20 July 2023 |language=en-US}}

=Chemical propulsion=

{{Main|Rocket engine}}

File:SpaceX engine test fire.jpg's Kestrel engine is tested.]]

A large fraction of rocket engines in use today are chemical rockets; that is, they obtain the energy needed to generate thrust by chemical reactions to create a hot gas that is expanded to produce thrust.{{Cite web |title=Chapter 14: Launch – NASA Science |url=https://science.nasa.gov/learn/basics-of-space-flight/chapter14-1/ |access-date=2024-04-19 |website=science.nasa.gov |date=20 July 2023 |language=en-US}} Many different propellant combinations are used to obtain these chemical reactions, including, for example, hydrazine, liquid oxygen, liquid hydrogen, nitrous oxide, and hydrogen peroxide.{{Cite web |title=4.0 In-Space Propulsion – NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/smallsat-institute/sst-soa/in-space_propulsion/ |access-date=2024-04-25 |language=en-US}} They can be used as a monopropellant or in bi-propellant configurations.{{Cite web |title=4.0 In-Space Propulsion – NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/smallsat-institute/sst-soa/in-space_propulsion/ |access-date=2024-04-20 |language=en-US}}

Rocket engines provide essentially the highest specific powers and high specific thrusts of any engine used for spacecraft propulsion. Most rocket engines are internal combustion heat engines (although non-combusting forms exist).{{Cite book |last=Leishman |first=J. Gordon |date=2023-01-01 |title=Introduction to Aerospace Flight Vehicles - Rocket Engines |url=https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/introductiontoaerospaceflightvehicles/chapter/rocket-engines/ |language=en|publisher=Embry Riddle Aeronautical University}} Rocket engines generally produce a high-temperature reaction mass, as a hot gas, which is achieved by combusting a solid, liquid or gaseous fuel with an oxidiser within a combustion chamber.{{Cite web |title=Rocket Propulsion |url=https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/rocket.html |access-date=April 21, 2024 |website=NASA}} The extremely hot gas is then allowed to escape through a high-expansion ratio bell-shaped nozzle, a feature that gives a rocket engine its characteristic shape. The effect of the nozzle is to accelerate the mass, converting most of the thermal energy into kinetic energy, where exhaust speeds reaching as high as 10 times the speed of sound at sea level are common.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}}

==Green chemical propulsion==

The dominant form of chemical propulsion for satellites has historically been hydrazine, however, this fuel is highly toxic and at risk of being banned across Europe.{{Cite web |date=2017-10-25 |title=Hydrazine ban could cost Europe's space industry billions |url=https://spacenews.com/hydrazine-ban-could-cost-europes-space-industry-billions/ |access-date=2022-08-19 |website=SpaceNews |language=en-US}} Non-toxic 'green' alternatives are now being developed to replace hydrazine. Nitrous oxide-based alternatives are garnering traction and government support,{{Cite web |last=Urban |first=Viktoria |date=2022-07-15 |title=Dawn Aerospace granted €1.4 million by EU for green propulsion technology |url=https://spacewatch.global/2022/07/dawn-aerospace-granted-e1-4-million-by-eu-for-green-propulsion-technology/ |access-date=2022-08-19 |website=SpaceWatch.Global |language=en-US}}{{Cite web |title=International research projects {{!}} Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment |url=https://www.mbie.govt.nz/science-and-technology/space/nzspacetalk/international-research-projects/ |access-date=2022-08-19 |website=www.mbie.govt.nz}} with development being led by commercial companies Dawn Aerospace, Impulse Space,{{Cite web |last=Berger |first=Eric |date=2022-07-19 |title=Two companies join SpaceX in the race to Mars, with a launch possible in 2024 |url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/07/relativity-and-impulse-space-say-theyre-flying-to-mars-in-late-2024/ |access-date=2022-08-19 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-us}} and Launcher.{{Cite web |date=2021-06-15 |title=Launcher to develop orbital transfer vehicle |url=https://spacenews.com/launcher-to-develop-orbital-transfer-vehicle/ |access-date=2022-08-19 |website=SpaceNews |language=en-US}} The first nitrous oxide-based system flown in space was by D-Orbit onboard their ION Satellite Carrier (space tug) in 2021, using six Dawn Aerospace B20 thrusters, launched upon a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket.{{Cite web |title=Dawn Aerospace validates B20 Thrusters in space – Bits&Chips |date=6 May 2021 |url=https://bits-chips.nl/artikel/dawn-aerospace-validates-b20-thrusters-in-space/ |access-date=2022-08-19 |language=en-US}}{{Cite web |title=Dawn B20 Thrusters Proven In Space |url=https://www.dawnaerospace.com/latest-news/b20-thrusters-proven-in-space |access-date=2022-08-19 |website=Dawn Aerospace |language=en-US}}

=Electric propulsion=

File:Ion Engine Test Firing - GPN-2000-000482.jpg for the Deep Space 1 spacecraft during a hot fire test at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory]]{{Main|Spacecraft electric propulsion}}

File:Xenon hall thruster.jpg Jet Propulsion Laboratory ]]

Rather than relying on high temperature and fluid dynamics to accelerate the reaction mass to high speeds, there are a variety of methods that use electrostatic or electromagnetic forces to accelerate the reaction mass directly, where the reaction mass is usually a stream of ions.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}}

Ion propulsion rockets typically heat a plasma or charged gas inside a magnetic bottle and release it via a magnetic nozzle so that no solid matter needs to come in contact with the plasma.{{Cite web |title=NASA Facts - Ion Propulsion |url=https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ionpropfact_sheet_ps-01628.pdf |access-date=May 18, 2024 |website=NASA}} Such an engine uses electric power, first to ionize atoms, and then to create a voltage gradient to accelerate the ions to high exhaust velocities.{{Cite web |title=Ion Propulsion – NASA Science |url=https://science.nasa.gov/mission/dawn/technology/ion-propulsion/ |access-date=2024-04-25 |website=science.nasa.gov |date=23 October 2018 |language=en-US}} For these drives, at the highest exhaust speeds, energetic efficiency and thrust are all inversely proportional to exhaust velocity.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} Their very high exhaust velocity means they require huge amounts of energy and thus with practical power sources provide low thrust, but use hardly any fuel.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}}

Electric propulsion is commonly used for station keeping on commercial communications satellites and for prime propulsion on some scientific space missions because of their high specific impulse.{{Cite web |title=Space Power Chapter 7: Electric Rockets – Opening the Solar System – NSS |date=3 August 2017 |url=https://nss.org/space-power-chapter-7-electric-rockets-opening-the-solar-system/ |access-date=2024-04-28 |language=en-US}} However, they generally have very small values of thrust and therefore must be operated for long durations to provide the total impulse required by a mission.{{Sfn|Meyer|2012|p=5}}Tomsik, Thomas M. "[http://thehuwaldtfamily.org/jtrl/research/Propulsion/Rocket%20Propulsion/NASA-TM-2000-209941,%20Advances%20in%20Cryo%20Propellant%20Densification%20Technology.pdf Recent advances and applications in cryogenic propellant densification technology] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141129035753/http://thehuwaldtfamily.org/jtrl/research/Propulsion/Rocket%20Propulsion/NASA-TM-2000-209941,%20Advances%20in%20Cryo%20Propellant%20Densification%20Technology.pdf|date=2014-11-29}}." NASA TM 209941 (2000).Oleson, S., and Sankovic, J. "[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2000ESASP.465..717O Advanced Hall electric propulsion for future in-space transportation]." Spacecraft Propulsion. Vol. 465. 2000.Dunning, John W., Scott Benson, and Steven Oleson. "NASA's electric propulsion program." 27th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Pasadena, California, IEPC-01-002. 2001.

The idea of electric propulsion dates to 1906, when Robert Goddard considered the possibility in his personal notebook.{{cite journal | last = Choueiri | first = Edgar Y. | year = 2004 | title = A Critical History of Electric Propulsion: The First 50 Years (1906–1956) | journal = Journal of Propulsion and Power | volume = 20 | issue = 2 | pages = 193–203 | url = http://alfven.princeton.edu/publications/choueiri-jpp-2004 | doi = 10.2514/1.9245 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.573.8519 | access-date = 2016-10-18 | archive-date = 2019-04-28 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190428155604/https://alfven.princeton.edu/publications/choueiri-jpp-2004 }} Konstantin Tsiolkovsky published the idea in 1911.{{Cite journal |last=Choueiri |first=Edgar |date=2004-06-26 |title=A Critical History of Electric Propulsion: The First Fifty Years (1906-1956) |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-3334 |journal=40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit |location=Reston, Virginia |publisher=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics |doi=10.2514/6.2004-3334|isbn=978-1-62410-037-6 |url-access=subscription }}

Electric propulsion methods include:{{Cite web |title=4.0 In-Space Propulsion – NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/smallsat-institute/sst-soa/in-space_propulsion/ |access-date=2024-04-28 |language=en-US}}

==Power sources==

For some missions, particularly reasonably close to the Sun, solar energy may be sufficient, and has often been used, but for others further out or at higher power, nuclear energy is necessary; engines drawing their power from a nuclear source are called nuclear electric rockets.{{Cite web |title=Space Nuclear Propulsion – NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/tdm/space-nuclear-propulsion/ |access-date=2024-04-28 |language=en-US}}

Current nuclear power generators are approximately half the weight of solar panels per watt of energy supplied, at terrestrial distances from the Sun.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} Chemical power generators are not used due to the far lower total available energy.{{Cite web |last=Luckenbaugh |first=Josh |date=July 31, 2023 |title=Government, Industry Explore Nuclear, Solar Space Engines |url=https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2023/7/31/government-industry-explore-nuclear-solar-space-engines |access-date=2024-04-28 |website=www.nationaldefensemagazine.org}} Beamed power to the spacecraft is considered to have potential, according to NASA and the University of Colorado Boulder.{{Cite web |date=2021 |title=Beamed Laser Power for UAVs |url=https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/120329main_fs-087-dfrc.pdf |access-date=April 24, 2024 |website=NASA}}{{Cite web |last=Beam Propulsion |first=Chuck |date=November 28, 2007 |title=Beam Propulsion |url=https://www.colorado.edu/faculty/kantha/sites/default/files/attached-files/final_vaughan.pdf#:~:text=If%20efficient%20magnetic%20nozzles%20can,as%20well%20as%20interplanetary%20missions. |access-date=April 24, 2024 |website=University of Colorado Boulder}}

With any current source of electrical power, chemical, nuclear or solar, the maximum amount of power that can be generated limits the amount of thrust that can be produced to a small value.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} Power generation adds significant mass to the spacecraft, and ultimately the weight of the power source limits the performance of the vehicle.{{Cite web |title=3.0 Power – NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/smallsat-institute/sst-soa/power-subsystems/ |access-date=2024-04-28 |language=en-US}}

=Nuclear propulsion=

{{Main|Nuclear propulsion#Spacecraft}}

File:Plasma propulsion engine.webp fusion plasma thruster]]

Nuclear fuels typically have very high specific energy, much higher than chemical fuels, which means that they can generate large amounts of energy per unit mass. This makes them valuable in spaceflight, as it can enable high specific impulses, sometimes even at high thrusts. The machinery to do this is complex, but research has developed methods for their use in propulsion systems, and some have been tested in a laboratory.{{Cite web |date=2018-05-25 |title=Nuclear Thermal Propulsion: Game Changing Technology for Deep Space Exploration – NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/stmd/tech-demo-missions-program/nuclear-thermal-propulsion-game-changing-technology-for-deep-space-exploration/ |access-date=2024-04-25 |language=en-US}}

Here, nuclear propulsion moreso refers to the source of propulsion being nuclear, instead of a nuclear electric rocket where a nuclear reactor would provide power (instead of solar panels) for other types of electrical propulsion.

Nuclear propulsion methods include:

= Without internal reaction mass =

There are several different space drives that need little or no reaction mass to function.

== Reaction wheels ==

Many spacecraft use reaction wheels or control moment gyroscopes to control orientation in space.{{cite journal |last=Tsiotras |first=P. |author2=Shen, H. |author3=Hall, C. D. |year=2001 |title=Satellite attitude control and power tracking with energy/momentum wheels |url=http://www.ae.gatech.edu/people/tsiotras/Papers/jgcd99.pdf |journal=Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics |volume=43 |issue=1 |pages=23–34 |bibcode=2001JGCD...24...23T |citeseerx=10.1.1.486.3386 |doi=10.2514/2.4705 |issn=0731-5090}}

A satellite or other space vehicle is subject to the law of conservation of angular momentum, which constrains a body from a net change in angular velocity. Thus, for a vehicle to change its relative orientation without expending reaction mass, another part of the vehicle may rotate in the opposite direction. Non-conservative external forces, primarily gravitational and atmospheric, can contribute up to several degrees per day to angular momentum,{{cite book |last=King-Hele |first=Desmond |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HSffDG356TkC&pg=PA6 |title=Satellite orbits in an atmosphere: Theory and application |publisher=Springer |year=1987 |isbn=978-0-216-92252-5 |page=6}} so such systems are designed to "bleed off" undesired rotational energies built up over time.

==EM wave-based propulsion==

{{original research | section | date=January 2017}}

The law of conservation of momentum is usually taken to imply that any engine which uses no reaction mass cannot accelerate the center of mass of a spaceship (changing orientation, on the other hand, is possible).{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} But space is not empty, especially space inside the Solar System; there are gravitation fields, magnetic fields, electromagnetic waves, solar wind and solar radiation.{{Cite web |title=What keeps space empty? |url=https://wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2012/12/20/what-keeps-space-empty/ |access-date=2024-04-28 |website=Science Questions with Surprising Answers |language=en-US}} Electromagnetic waves in particular are known to contain momentum, despite being massless; specifically the momentum flux density P of an EM wave is quantitatively 1/c2 times the Poynting vector S, i.e. P = S/c2, where c is the velocity of light.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} Field propulsion methods which do not rely on reaction mass thus must try to take advantage of this fact by coupling to a momentum-bearing field such as an EM wave that exists in the vicinity of the craft; however, because many of these phenomena are diffuse in nature, corresponding propulsion structures must be proportionately large.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}}

==Solar and magnetic sails==

File:Solarsail msfc.jpg

The concept of solar sails rely on radiation pressure from electromagnetic energy, but they require a large collection surface to function effectively.{{Cite web |title=NASA-Supported Solar Sail Could Take Science to New Heights – NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-supported-solar-sail-could-take-science-to-new-heights/ |access-date=2024-04-28 |language=en-US}} E-sails propose to use very thin and lightweight wires holding an electric charge to deflect particles, which may have more controllable directionality.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}}

Magnetic sails deflect charged particles from the solar wind with a magnetic field, thereby imparting momentum to the spacecraft.{{Cite journal |last=Djojodihardjo |first=Harijono |date=November 2018 |title=Review of Solar Magnetic Sailing Configurations for Space Travel |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42423-018-0022-4 |journal=Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology |language=en |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=207–219 |doi=10.1007/s42423-018-0022-4 |bibcode=2018AAnST...1..207D |issn=2524-5252|url-access=subscription }} For instance, the so-called Magsail is a large superconducting loop proposed for acceleration/deceleration in the solar wind and deceleration in the Interstellar medium.{{Cite journal |last1=Zubrin |first1=Robert M. |last2=Andrews |first2=Dana G. |date=March 1991 |title=Magnetic sails and interplanetary travel |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/3.26230 |journal=Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets |language=en |volume=28 |issue=2 |pages=197–203 |doi=10.2514/3.26230 |bibcode=1991JSpRo..28..197Z |issn=0022-4650|url-access=subscription }} A variant is the mini-magnetospheric plasma propulsion system{{Cite journal |last1=Winglee |first1=R. M. |last2=Slough |first2=J. |last3=Ziemba |first3=T. |last4=Goodson |first4=A. |date=September 2000 |title=Mini-Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion: Tapping the energy of the solar wind for spacecraft propulsion |url=https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/1999JA000334 |journal=Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |language=en |volume=105 |issue=A9 |pages=21067–21077 |doi=10.1029/1999JA000334 |bibcode=2000JGR...10521067W |issn=0148-0227|url-access=subscription }} and its successor, the magnetoplasma sail,{{Cite journal |last1=Funaki |first1=Ikkoh |last2=Asahi |first2=Ryusuke |last3=Fujita |first3=Kazuhisa |last4=Yamakawa |first4=Hiroshi |last5=Ogawa |first5=Hiroyuki |last6=Otsu |first6=Hirotaka |last7=Nonaka |first7=Satoshi |last8=Sawai |first8=Shujiro |last9=Kuninaka |first9=Hitoshi |date=2003-06-23 |title=Thrust Production Mechanism of a Magnetoplasma Sail |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2003-4292 |journal=34th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Laser Conference |language=en |publisher=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics |doi=10.2514/6.2003-4292 |isbn=978-1-62410-096-3|url-access=subscription }} which inject plasma at a low rate to enhance the magnetic field to more effectively deflect charged particles in a plasma wind.

Japan launched a solar sail-powered spacecraft, IKAROS in May 2010, which successfully demonstrated propulsion and guidance (and is still active as of this date).{{when|date = July 2023}}{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} As further proof of the solar sail concept, NanoSail-D became the first such powered satellite to orbit Earth.{{Cite web |url= http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/tdm/solarsail|title=Solar Sail Demonstrator|work=NASA |date=19 September 2016 |last1=Harbaugh |first1=Jennifer }} As of August 2017, NASA confirmed the Sunjammer solar sail project was concluded in 2014 with lessons learned for future space sail projects.{{Cite web|url=https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/tdm/solarsail/index.html|title=Solar Sail Demonstrator|date=19 September 2016}} The U.K. Cubesail programme will be the first mission to demonstrate solar sailing in low Earth orbit, and the first mission to demonstrate full three-axis attitude control of a solar sail.{{cite web|title=Space Vehicle Control|url=http://www.surrey.ac.uk/ssc/research/space_vehicle_control/cubesail/news/index.htm|website=University of Surrey|access-date=8 August 2015|archive-date=7 May 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160507025010/http://www.surrey.ac.uk/ssc/research/space_vehicle_control/cubesail/news/index.htm}}

==Other propulsion types==

The concept of a gravitational slingshot is a form of propulsion to carry a space probe onward to other destinations without the expense of reaction mass; harnessing the gravitational energy of other celestial objects allows the spacecraft to gain kinetic energy.{{Cite journal | year = 2004 | pages = 619–000 | doi = 10.1119/1.1621032| last2 = Cacioppo| last3 = Gangopadhyaya| first1 = J. J. | volume = 72| last1 = Dykla | first2 = R.| first3 = A. | journal = American Journal of Physics | title = Gravitational slingshot| issue = 5|bibcode = 2004AmJPh..72..619D | url = http://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=physics_facpubs| url-access = subscription}} However, more energy can be obtained from the gravity assist if rockets are used via the Oberth effect.

A tether propulsion system employs a long cable with a high tensile strength to change a spacecraft's orbit, such as by interaction with a planet's magnetic field or through momentum exchange with another object.{{cite news|first=Dave |last=Drachlis |title=NASA calls on industry, academia for in-space propulsion innovations |publisher=NASA |date=October 24, 2002 |url=http://www.msfc.nasa.gov/news/news/releases/2002/02-269.html |access-date=2007-07-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071206095134/http://www.msfc.nasa.gov/news/news/releases/2002/02-269.html |archive-date=December 6, 2007 }}

Beam-powered propulsion is another method of propulsion without reaction mass, and includes sails pushed by laser, microwave, or particle beams.{{Cite web |date=2023-01-09 |title=Pellet-Beam Propulsion for Breakthrough Space Exploration – NASA |url=https://www.nasa.gov/general/pellet-beam-propulsion-for-breakthrough-space-exploration/ |access-date=2024-04-24 |language=en-US}}

=Advanced propulsion technology=

Advanced, and in some cases theoretical, propulsion technologies may use chemical or nonchemical physics to produce thrust but are generally considered to be of lower technical maturity with challenges that have not been overcome.{{Sfn|Meyer|2012|p=20}} For both human and robotic exploration, traversing the solar system is a struggle against time and distance. The most distant planets are 4.5–6 billion kilometers from the Sun and to reach them in any reasonable time requires much more capable propulsion systems than conventional chemical rockets. Rapid inner solar system missions with flexible launch dates are difficult, requiring propulsion systems that are beyond today's current state of the art. The logistics, and therefore the total system mass required to support sustained human exploration beyond Earth to destinations such as the Moon, Mars, or near-Earth objects, are daunting unless more efficient in-space propulsion technologies are developed and fielded.{{Sfn|Meyer|2012|p=6}}

{{cite journal

|doi=10.1061/40476(299)45

|citeseerx = 10.1.1.83.3242

|title=Robotics Challenges for Robotic and Human Mars Exploration

|journal=Robotics 2000

|year=2000

|last1=Huntsberger

|first1=Terry

|last2=Rodriguez

|first2=Guillermo

|last3=Schenker

|first3=Paul S.

|isbn=978-0-7844-0476-8

|pages=340–346}}

A variety of hypothetical propulsion techniques have been considered that require a deeper understanding of the properties of space, particularly inertial frames and the vacuum state. Such methods are highly speculative and include:{{citation needed|date = July 2023}}{{colbegin}}

{{colend}}

A NASA assessment of its Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program divides such proposals into those that are non-viable for propulsion purposes, those that are of uncertain potential, and those that are not impossible according to current theories.{{cite conference

| first =Marc

| last =Millis

| title =Assessing Potential Propulsion Breakthroughs

| book-title =New Trends in Astrodynamics and Applications II

| date =June 3–5, 2005

| location =Princeton, NJ

| url =https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060000022.pdf

}}

=Table of methods=

{{more citations needed section|date = July 2023}}

Below is a summary of some of the more popular, proven technologies, followed by increasingly speculative methods. Four numbers are shown. The first is the effective exhaust velocity: the equivalent speed which the propellant leaves the vehicle. This is not necessarily the most important characteristic of the propulsion method; thrust and power consumption and other factors can be. However,

  • if the delta-v is much more than the exhaust velocity, then exorbitant amounts of fuel are necessary (see the section on calculations, above),{{according to whom|date = July 2023}} and
  • if it is much more than the delta-v, then, proportionally more energy is needed; if the power is limited, as with solar energy, this means that the journey takes a proportionally longer time.{{according to whom|date = July 2023}}

The second and third are the typical amounts of thrust and the typical burn times of the method; outside a gravitational potential, small amounts of thrust applied over a long period will give the same effect as large amounts of thrust over a short period, if the object is not significantly influenced by gravity.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} The fourth is the maximum delta-v the technique can give without staging. For rocket-like propulsion systems, this is a function of mass fraction and exhaust velocity; mass fraction for rocket-like systems is usually limited by propulsion system weight and tankage weight.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} For a system to achieve this limit, the payload may need to be a negligible percentage of the vehicle, and so the practical limit on some systems can be much lower.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}}

class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;"

|+ Propulsion methods

! style="text-align:left;" | Method

! Effective exhaust
velocity
(km/s)

! Thrust (N)

! Firing
duration

! Maximum
delta-v (km/s)

! style="text-align:left;" | Technology
readiness level

style="text-align:left;" | Solid-fuel rocket{{ntsh|2.5}}<2.5<107{{Ntsh|60}}Minutes{{Nts|7}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|9}}: Flight proven

style="text-align:left;" | Hybrid rocket<4{{Ntsh|60}}Minutes{{Ntsh|3}}>3

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|9}}: Flight proven

style="text-align:left;" | Monopropellant rocket{{Ntsh|2}}1–3{{Cite web|url=http://www.space-propulsion.com/brochures/hydrazine-thrusters/hydrazine-thrusters.pdf|title=Chemical monopropellant thruster family|website=Ariane Group|access-date=16 March 2019}}{{Ntsh|{{#expr:10^.5}}}}0.1–400{{Ntsh|1}}Milliseconds–minutes{{Nts|3}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|9}}: Flight proven

style="text-align:left;" | Liquid-fuel rocket{{ntsh|4.4}}<4.4<107{{Ntsh|60}}Minutes{{Nts|9}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|9}}: Flight proven

style="text-align:left;" | Electrostatic ion thruster{{Ntsh|112.5}}15–210{{cite web| title = ESA Portal – ESA and ANU make space propulsion breakthrough|url=https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/25070-esa-and-australian-team-develop-breakthrough-in-space-propulsion|date=18 January 2006|publisher=European Union}}{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*365.25*12^-.5}}}}Months–years{{Ntsh|100}}>100

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|9}}: Flight proven

style="text-align:left;" | Hall-effect thruster (HET){{Ntsh|29}}up to 50{{Cite web |url=https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/hall/overview/overview.htm |title=Overview of Hall thrusters |access-date=2020-05-29 |archive-date=2020-05-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200523031148/https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/hall/overview/overview.htm }}{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*365.25*12^-.5}}}}Months–years{{Ntsh|100}}>100

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|9}}: Flight provenHall-effect thrusters have been used on Russian and antecedent Soviet bloc satellites for decades.{{Original research inline|date = July 2023}}{{citation needed|date = July 2022}}

style="text-align:left;" | Resistojet rocket{{Ntsh|4}}2–6{{Ntsh|{{#expr:10^-.5}}}}10−2–10{{Ntsh|60}}Minutes{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|8}}: Flight qualified[https://www.webcitation.org/5sq1FWURx?url=http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/CDReadyMJPC2005_1177/PV2005_4260.pdf A Xenon Resistojet Propulsion System for Microsatellites] (Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey)

style="text-align:left;" | Arcjet rocket{{Ntsh|10}}4–16{{Ntsh|{{#expr:10^-.5}}}}10−2–10{{Ntsh|60}}Minutes{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|8}}: Flight qualified{{Citation needed|date=February 2010}}

style="text-align:left;" | Field-emission
electric propulsion
(FEEP)
{{Ntsh|115}}100{{cite web| url = http://www.alta-space.com/index.php?page=feep| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110707120124/http://www.alta-space.com/index.php?page=feep| archive-date = 2011-07-07| title = Alta - Space Propulsion, Systems and Services - Field Emission Electric Propulsion}}–130{{Ntsh|{{#expr:10^-4.5}}}}10−6–10−3{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*365.25*12^-.5}}}}Months–years{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|8}}: Flight qualified

style="text-align:left;" | Pulsed plasma thruster (PPT){{Nts|20}}{{Nts|0.1}}{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600000*10^((1+ln2/ln10)/2)}}}}80–400 days{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|7}}: Prototype demonstrated in space

style="text-align:left;" | Dual-mode propulsion rocket{{Ntsh|2.85}}1–4.7{{Ntsh|1000}}0.1–107{{Ntsh|1}}Milliseconds–minutes{{Ntsh|6}}3–9

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|7}}: Prototype demonstrated in space

style="text-align:left;" | Solar sails

| Radiation pressure, Speed of light

| {{Ntsh|9}} 9.08/km2 at 1 AU
908/km2 at 0.1 AU
10−10/km2 at 4 ly

| Indefinite

{{Ntsh|40}}>40

| {{Ntsh|6.9}}{{unbulleted list

| 9: Light pressure attitude-control flight proven

| 6: Model, 196 m2 1.12 mN 400 m/s delta-v demonstrated in interplanetary space{{cite web |url=http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/home/IKAROS-blog/?itemid=1017|title=今日の IKAROS(8/29) – Daily Report – Aug 29, 2013 | publisher=Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) |date=29 August 2013 | access-date=8 June 2014 |language=ja}}

}}

style="text-align:left;" | Tripropellant rocket{{Ntsh|3.9}}2.5–5.3{{Citation needed|date=February 2011}}{{Ntsh|1000}}0.1–107{{Citation needed|date=February 2011}}{{Ntsh|60}}Minutes{{Nts|9}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|6}}: Prototype demonstrated on ground[http://www.astronautix.com/engines/rd701.htm RD-701] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100210203238/http://www.astronautix.com/engines/rd701.htm |date=2010-02-10 }}

style="text-align:left;" | Magnetoplasmadynamic
thruster
(MPD)
{{Ntsh|60}}20–100{{Nts|100}}{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*7}}}}Weeks{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|6}}: Model, 1 kW demonstrated in space{{cite web| url = https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/ISASnews/No.190/labo-5.html| title = Google Translate}}

style="text-align:left;" | Nuclear–thermal rocket{{Nts|9}}[http://www.astronautix.com/engines/rd0410.htm RD-0410] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090408122011/http://www.astronautix.com/engines/rd0410.htm |date=2009-04-08 }}{{Ntsh|10000000}}107{{Ntsh|60}}Minutes{{Ntsh|20}}>20

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|6}}: Prototype demonstrated on ground

style="text-align:left;" | Propulsive mass drivers{{Ntsh|15}}0–30{{Ntsh|1000000}}104–108{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*31}}}}Months{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|6}}: Model, 32 MJ demonstrated on ground

style="text-align:left;" | Tether propulsion{{n/a}}{{Ntsh|1000000}}1–1012{{Ntsh|60}}Minutes{{Ntsh|7}}7

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|6}}: Model, 31.7 km demonstrated in space[http://www.yes2.info/ Young Engineers' Satellite 2] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030210014335/http://www.yes2.info/ |date=2003-02-10 }}

style="text-align:left;" | Air-augmented rocket{{Ntsh|5.5}}5–6{{Ntsh|1000}}0.1–107{{Ntsh|{{#expr:60^.5}}}}Seconds–minutes{{Ntsh|7}}>7?

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|6}}: Prototype demonstrated on ground[http://astronautix.com/lvs/gnom.htm Gnom] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100102204131/http://astronautix.com/lvs/gnom.htm |date=2010-01-02 }}[http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT2002/5000/5880trefny.html NASA GTX] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081122140310/http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT2002/5000/5880trefny.html |date=November 22, 2008 }}

style="text-align:left;" | Liquid-air-cycle engine{{Nts|4.5}}{{Ntsh|100000}}103–107{{Ntsh|{{#expr:60^.5}}}}Seconds–minutes{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|6}}: Prototype demonstrated on ground

style="text-align:left;" | Pulsed-inductive thruster (PIT){{Ntsh|45}}10–80{{cite web| url = https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19930023164_1993023164.pdf| title = The PIT MkV pulsed inductive thruster}}{{Nts|20}}{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*31}}}}Months{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|5}}: Component validated in vacuum

style="text-align:left;" | Variable-specific-impulse
magnetoplasma rocket

(VASIMR)
{{Ntsh|155}}10–300{{Citation needed|date=February 2011}}{{Ntsh|620}}40–1,200{{Citation needed|date=February 2011}}{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*31^.5}}}}Days–months{{Ntsh|100}}>100

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|5}}: Component, 200 kW validated in vacuum

style="text-align:left;" | Magnetic-field oscillating
amplified thruster
(MOA)
{{Ntsh|70}}10–390{{cite web| url = http://scidoc.org/articlepdfs/IJASAR/IJASAR-2470-4415-10-102.pdf| title = Thermal velocities in the plasma of a MOA Device, M.Hettmer, Int J Aeronautics Aerospace Res. 2023;10(1):297-300}}{{Ntsh|{{#expr:10^-.5}}}}0.1–1{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*31^.5}}}}Days–months{{Ntsh|100}}>100

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|5}}: Component validated in vacuum

style="text-align:left;" | Solar–thermal rocket{{Ntsh|9.5}}7–12{{Ntsh|10}}1–100{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*7}}}}Weeks{{Ntsh|20}}>20

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|4}}: Component validated in lab{{cite news|url=https://spaceref.com/press-release/pratt-whitney-rocketdyne-wins-22-million-contract-option-for-solar-thermal-propulsion-rocket-engine/|title= Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne Wins $2.2 Million Contract Option for Solar Thermal Propulsion Rocket Engine|date= June 25, 2008|publisher=Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne)}}

style="text-align:left;" | Radioisotope rocket/Steam thruster{{Ntsh|7.5}}7–8{{citation needed|date=January 2011}}{{Ntsh|1.4}}1.3–1.5{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*31}}}}Months{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|4}}: Component validated in lab

style="text-align:left;" | Nuclear–electric rocket

| colspan=4 {{n/a|As electric propulsion method used}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|4}}: Component, 400 kW validated in lab

style="text-align:left;" | Orion Project (near-term
nuclear pulse propulsion)
{{Ntsh|60}}20–100{{Ntsh|{{#expr:10^10.5}}}}109–1012{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*7}}}}Days{{Ntsh|45}}30–60

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|3}}: Validated, 900 kg proof-of-concept{{cite web| url=http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Plumbob.html#PascalB| title=Operation Plumbbob|date=July 2003| access-date=2006-07-31}}{{cite web| url=http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Brownlee.html| title=Learning to Contain Underground Nuclear Explosions| first=Robert R.| last=Brownlee|date=June 2002| access-date=2006-07-31}}

style="text-align:left;" | Space elevator{{n/a}}{{n/a}}Indefinite{{Ntsh|12}}>12

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|3}}: Validated proof-of-concept

style="text-align:left;" | Reaction Engines SABRE{{Ntsh|17.25}}30/4.5{{Ntsh|1000}}0.1 – 107{{Ntsh|60}}Minutes{{Nts|9.4}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|3}}: Validated proof-of-concept

style="text-align:left;" | Electric sails

| 145–750, solar wind

| {{dunno}}

Indefinite{{Ntsh|40}}>40

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|3}}: Validated proof-of-concept

style="text-align:left;" | Magsail in Solar wind{{n/a}}{{Ntsh|644}}{{Nts|644}}{{Cite journal |last1=Andrews |first1=Dana |last2=Zubrin |first2=Robert |date=1990 |title=MAGNETIC SAILS AND INTERSTELLAR TRAVEL |url=https://www.academia.edu/78476000 |journal=Journal of the British Interplanetary Society |volume=43 |pages=265–272 |via=JBIS}}{{Efn|Divided by 3.1 correction factor.}}Indefinite{{Ntsh|250}}250–750

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|3}}: Validated proof-of-concept

style="text-align:left;" | Magnetoplasma sail in Solar wind{{Cite journal |last1=Funaki |first1=Ikkoh |last2=Kajimura |first2=Yoshihiro |last3=Ashida |first3=Yasumasa |last4=Yamakawa |first4=Hiroshi |last5=Nishida |first5=Hiroyuki |last6=Oshio |first6=Yuya |last7=Ueno |first7=Kazuma |last8=Shinohara |first8=Iku |last9=Yamamura |first9=Haruhito |last10=Yamagiwa |first10=Yoshiki |date=2013-07-14 |title=Magnetoplasma Sail with Equatorial Ring-current |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2013-3878 |journal=49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference |series=Joint Propulsion Conferences |language=en |location=San Jose, CA |publisher=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics |doi=10.2514/6.2013-3878 |isbn=978-1-62410-222-6|url-access=subscription }}278{{Ntsh|700}}700{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*31}}}}Months–Years{{Ntsh|250}}250–750

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|4}}: Component validated in lab{{Citation |last1=Funaki |first1=Ikkoh |title=Solar Wind Sails |date=2012-03-21 |url=http://www.intechopen.com/books/exploring-the-solar-wind/solar-wind-sails |work=Exploring the Solar Wind |editor-last=Lazar |editor-first=Marian |publisher=InTech |language=en |bibcode=2012esw..book..439F |doi=10.5772/35673 |isbn=978-953-51-0339-4 |access-date=2022-06-13 |last2=Yamakaw |first2=Hiroshi|s2cid=55922338 |doi-access=free }}

style="text-align:left;" | Magsail in Interstellar medium{{Cite journal |last=Freeland |first=R.M. |date=2015 |title=Mathematics of Magsail |url=https://bis-space.com/shop/product/mathematics-of-magsails/ |journal=Journal of the British Interplanetary Society |volume=68 |pages=306–323 |via=bis-space.com}}

|{{n/a}}

|88,000 initially

|{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*365*10}}}}Decades

|{{Ntsh|15000}}15,000

| style="text-align:left;" |{{Nts|3}}: Validated proof-of-concept

style="text-align:left;" | Beam-powered/laser

| colspan=4 {{n/a|As propulsion method powered by beam}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|3}}: Validated, 71 m proof-of-concept

style="text-align:left;" | Launch loop/orbital ring{{n/a}}{{Ntsh|10000}}104{{Ntsh|60}}Minutes{{Ntsh|20.5}}11–30

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Nuclear pulse propulsion
(Project Daedalus' drive)
{{Ntsh|510}}20–1,000{{Ntsh|{{#expr:10^10.5}}}}109–1012{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*365.25}}}}Years{{Ntsh|15000}}15,000

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Gas-core reactor rocket{{Ntsh|15}}10 – 20{{Ntsh|{{#expr:10^4.5}}}}103–106{{dunno}}{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Nuclear salt-water rocket{{Nts|100}}{{Ntsh|100000}}103–107{{Ntsh|1800}}Half-hour{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Fission sail{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Fission-fragment rocket{{Nts|15000}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Nuclear–photonic rocket/Photon rocketRadiation pressure, Speed of light{{Ntsh|{{#expr:10^-2.5}}}}10−5–1{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*365.25*10^.5}}}}Years–decades{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Fusion rocket{{Ntsh|550}}100–1,000{{citation needed|date=January 2011}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Antimatter-catalyzed
nuclear pulse propulsion
{{Ntsh|2100}}200–4,000{{dunno}}{{Ntsh|{{#expr:3600*24*7^.5}}}}Days–weeks{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Antimatter rocket{{Ntsh|55000}}10,000–100,000{{citation needed|date=January 2011}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}{{dunno}}

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Bussard ramjet{{Ntsh|10001.1}}2.2–20,000{{dunno}}Indefinite{{Ntsh|30000}}30,000

| style="text-align:left;" | {{Nts|2}}: Technology concept formulated

style="text-align:left;" | Method

! Effective exhaust
velocity
(km/s)

! Thrust (N)

! Firing
duration

! Maximum
delta-v (km/s)

! style="text-align:left;" | Technology
readiness level

Table Notes{{Notelist}}

Planetary and atmospheric propulsion

=Launch-assist mechanisms=

{{Main|Space launch}}

There have been many ideas proposed for launch-assist mechanisms that have the potential of substantially reducing the cost of getting to orbit. Proposed non-rocket spacelaunch launch-assist mechanisms include:{{Cite web |date=1970-01-01 |title=Can We Get Into Space Without Big Rockets? |url=https://science.howstuffworks.com/can-get-into-space-without-big-rocket.htm |access-date=2024-04-28 |website=HowStuffWorks |language=en-us}}{{Cite web |last=Bolonkin |first=Alexander |date=January 2011 |title=Review of new ideas, innovations of non- rocket propulsion systems for Space Launch and Flight (Part 2) |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268426650 |access-date=April 28, 2024 |website=www.researchgate.net}}

=Air-breathing engines=

{{Main|Jet engine|Air-breathing electric propulsion}}

{{more citations needed section | date = July 2023}}

Studies generally show that conventional air-breathing engines, such as ramjets or turbojets are basically too heavy (have too low a thrust/weight ratio) to give significant performance improvement when installed on a launch vehicle.{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}} However, launch vehicles can be air launched from separate lift vehicles (e.g. B-29, Pegasus Rocket and White Knight) which do use such propulsion systems. Jet engines mounted on a launch rail could also be so used.{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}}

On the other hand, very lightweight or very high-speed engines have been proposed that take advantage of the air during ascent:

  • SABRE – a lightweight hydrogen fuelled turbojet with precooler{{cite web

|author=Anonymous

|year=2006

|url=http://www.reactionengines.co.uk/sabre.html

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070222125903/http://www.reactionengines.co.uk/sabre.html

|archive-date=2007-02-22

|title=The Sabre Engine

|publisher=Reaction Engines Ltd.

|access-date=2007-07-26

}}

  • ATREX – a lightweight hydrogen fuelled turbojet with precooler{{cite journal

|author1=Harada, K. |author2=Tanatsugu, N. |author3=Sato, T. | title=Development Study on ATREX Engine

| journal=Acta Astronautica

| year=1997 | volume=41 | issue=12 | pages=851–862

| doi=10.1016/S0094-5765(97)00176-8 |bibcode=1997AcAau..41..851T}}

  • Liquid air cycle engine – a hydrogen-fuelled jet engine that liquifies the air before burning it in a rocket engine
  • Scramjet – jet engines that use supersonic combustion
  • Shcramjet – similar to a scramjet engine, however it takes advantage of shockwaves produced from the aircraft in the combustion chamber to assist in increasing overall efficiency.

Normal rocket launch vehicles fly almost vertically before rolling over at an altitude of some tens of kilometers before burning sideways for orbit; this initial vertical climb wastes propellant but is optimal as it greatly reduces airdrag. Airbreathing engines burn propellant much more efficiently and this would permit a far flatter launch trajectory. The vehicles would typically fly approximately tangentially to Earth's surface until leaving the atmosphere then perform a rocket burn to bridge the final delta-v to orbital velocity.

For spacecraft already in very low-orbit, air-breathing electric propulsion could use residual gases in the upper atmosphere as a propellant. Air-breathing electric propulsion could make a new class of long-lived, low-orbiting missions feasible on Earth, Mars or Venus.{{cite news|title=World-first firing of air-breathing electric thruster|url=http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Engineering_Technology/World-first_firing_of_air-breathing_electric_thruster|access-date=7 March 2018|work=Space Engineering & Technology|publisher=European Space Agency|date=5 March 2018}}[http://erps.spacegrant.org/uploads/images/2015Presentations/IEPC-2015-271_ISTS-2015-b-271.pdf Conceptual design of an air-breathing electric propulsion system] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170404043702/http://erps.spacegrant.org/uploads/images/2015Presentations/IEPC-2015-271_ISTS-2015-b-271.pdf |date=2017-04-04 }}. (PDF). 30th International Symposium on Space Technology and Science. 34th International Electric Propulsion Conference and 6th Nano-satellite Symposium. Hyogo-Kobe, Japan July 4, 2015.

=Planetary arrival and landing=

{{Main|Atmospheric entry}}

{{More sources needed|section|date=April 2024}}

File:Pathfinder Air Bags - GPN-2000-000484.jpg airbag system]]

When a vehicle is to enter orbit around its destination planet, or when it is to land, it must adjust its velocity.{{Cite web |title=Chapter 4: Trajectories – NASA Science |url=https://science.nasa.gov/learn/basics-of-space-flight/chapter4-1/ |access-date=2024-04-24 |website=science.nasa.gov |date=20 July 2023 |language=en-US}} This can be done using any of the methods listed above (provided they can generate a high enough thrust), but there are methods that can take advantage of planetary atmospheres and/or surfaces.

  • Aerobraking allows a spacecraft to reduce the high point of an elliptical orbit by repeated brushes with the atmosphere{{Cite web |title=Definition of AEROBRAKE |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/aerobrake |access-date=2024-04-24 |website=www.merriam-webster.com |language=en}} at the low point of the orbit. This can save a considerable amount of fuel because it takes much less delta-V to enter an elliptical orbit compared to a low circular orbit. Because the braking is done over the course of many orbits, heating is comparatively minor, and a heat shield is not required. This has been done on several Mars missions such as Mars Global Surveyor, 2001 Mars Odyssey, and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, and at least one Venus mission, Magellan.
  • Aerocapture is a much more aggressive manoeuver, converting an incoming hyperbolic orbit to an elliptical orbit in one pass. This requires a heat shield and more controlled navigation because it must be completed in one pass through the atmosphere, and unlike aerobraking no preview of the atmosphere is possible. If the intent is to remain in orbit, then at least one more propulsive maneuver is required after aerocapture—otherwise the low point of the resulting orbit will remain in the atmosphere, resulting in eventual re-entry. Aerocapture has not yet been tried on a planetary mission, but the re-entry skip by Zond 6 and Zond 7 upon lunar return were aerocapture maneuvers, because they turned a hyperbolic orbit into an elliptical orbit. On these missions, because there was no attempt to raise the perigee after the aerocapture, the resulting orbit still intersected the atmosphere, and re-entry occurred at the next perigee.
  • A ballute is an inflatable drag device.{{Cite web |title=Definition of BALLUTE |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ballute |access-date=2024-04-26 |website=www.merriam-webster.com |language=en}}
  • Parachutes can land a probe on a planet or moon with an atmosphere, usually after the atmosphere has scrubbed off most of the velocity, using a heat shield.
  • Airbags can soften the final landing.
  • Lithobraking, or stopping by impacting the surface, is usually done by accident. However, it may be done deliberately with the probe expected to survive (see, for example, the Deep Impact spacecraft), in which case very sturdy probes are required.

Research

Development of technologies will result in technical solutions that improve thrust levels, specific impulse, power, specific mass, (or specific power), volume, system mass, system complexity, operational complexity, commonality with other spacecraft systems, manufacturability, durability, and cost. These types of improvements will yield decreased transit times, increased payload mass, safer spacecraft, and decreased costs. In some instances, the development of technologies within this technology area will result in mission-enabling breakthroughs that will revolutionize space exploration. There is no single propulsion technology that will benefit all missions or mission types; the requirements for in-space propulsion vary widely according to their intended application.{{Sfn|Meyer|2012|p=5}}

One institution focused on developing primary propulsion technologies aimed at benefitting near and mid-term science missions by reducing cost, mass, and/or travel times is the Glenn Research Center (GRC).{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} Electric propulsion architectures are of particular interest to the GRC, including ion and Hall thrusters.{{citation needed|date = July 2023}} One system combines solar sails, a form of propellantless propulsion which relies on naturally-occurring starlight for propulsion energy, and Hall thrusters. Other propulsion technologies being developed include advanced chemical propulsion and aerocapture.[https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/space/sep/ Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP)]. Glenn Research Center. NASA. 2019[http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/ion/ Ion propulsion system research] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060901214224/http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/ion/|date=2006-09-01}}. Glenn Research Center. NASA. 2013

=Defining technologies=

The term "mission pull" defines a technology or a performance characteristic necessary to meet a planned NASA mission requirement. Any other relationship between a technology and a mission (an alternate propulsion system, for example) is categorized as "technology push." Also, a space demonstration refers to the spaceflight of a scaled version of a particular technology or of a critical technology subsystem. On the other hand, a space validation would serve as a qualification flight for future mission implementation. A successful validation flight would not require any additional space testing of a particular technology before it can be adopted for a science or exploration mission.{{Sfn|Meyer|2012|p=5}}

=Testing=

Spacecraft propulsion systems are often first statically tested on Earth's surface, within the atmosphere but many systems require a vacuum chamber to test fully.{{Cite journal |last1=Rafalskyi |first1=Dmytro |last2=Martínez |first2=Javier Martínez |last3=Habl |first3=Lui |last4=Zorzoli Rossi |first4=Elena |last5=Proynov |first5=Plamen |last6=Boré |first6=Antoine |last7=Baret |first7=Thomas |last8=Poyet |first8=Antoine |last9=Lafleur |first9=Trevor |last10=Dudin |first10=Stanislav |last11=Aanesland |first11=Ane |date=November 2021 |title=In-orbit demonstration of an iodine electric propulsion system |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=599 |issue=7885 |pages=411–415 |doi=10.1038/s41586-021-04015-y |pmid=34789903 |issn=1476-4687|pmc=8599014 |bibcode=2021Natur.599..411R }} Rockets are usually tested at a rocket engine test facility well away from habitation and other buildings for safety reasons. Ion drives are far less dangerous and require much less stringent safety, usually only a moderately large vacuum chamber is needed.{{Citation needed|date=April 2024}} Static firing of engines are done at ground test facilities, and systems which cannot be adequately tested on the ground and require launches may be employed at a launch site.

In fiction

{{Main|Space travel in science fiction#Methods of travel}}

File:Wormhole travel as envisioned by Les Bossinas for NASA.jpg

In science fiction, space ships use various means to travel, some of them scientifically plausible (like solar sails or ramjets), others, mostly or entirely fictitious (like anti-gravity, warp drive, spindizzy or hyperspace travel).{{Cite book|last=Ash|first=Brian|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-SUYAAAAIAAJ&q=Visual+Encyclopedia+of+Science+Fiction|title=The Visual Encyclopedia of Science Fiction|date=1977|publisher=Harmony Books|isbn=978-0-517-53174-7|language=en}}{{Rp|8, 69–77}}{{Cite book|last=Prucher|first=Jeff|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lJCS0reqmFUC&q=Earthling+%22science+fiction%22&pg=PP2|title=Brave New Words: The Oxford Dictionary of Science Fiction|date=2007-05-07|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-988552-7|pages=|language=en}}{{Rp|142}}

Further reading

{{more science citations needed|section|date=July 2023}}

  • {{cite book |author=Heister, Stephen D. |author2=Anderson, William E. |author3=Pourpoint, Timothée L. |author4=Cassady, R. Joseph |date=2019 |title=Rocket Propulsion |edition= |volume=47 |series=Cambridge Aerospace Series |location=Cambridge England |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-39506-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zZCFDwAAQBAJ |access-date=22 July 2023}}
  • {{cite book |author=Sutton |first1=George P. |last2=Biblarz |first2=Oscar |date=2016 |title=Rocket Propulsion Elements |edition=9th |location=New York, New York |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-75365-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XwSRDQAAQBAJ |access-date=22 July 2023}}
  • {{cite journal |author=Taploo, A |author2=Lin, Li |author3=Keidar, Michael | date = 1 September 2021 | title = Analysis of Ionization in Air-Breathing Plasma Thruster | journal = Physics of Plasmas | volume = 28 | issue = 9 | page = 093505 | doi = 10.1063/5.0059896 | bibcode = 2021PhPl...28i3505T | s2cid = 240531647}}{{primary source inline|date = July 2023}} See also: {{cite journal |author=Taploo, A |author2=Lin, Li |author3=Keidar, Michael | date = 2022 | title = Air Ionization in Self-Neutralizing Air-Breathing Plasma Thruster | journal = J. Electr. Propuls. | volume = 1 | issue = 1| page = 25 | doi = 10.1007/s44205-022-00022-x | bibcode = 2022JElP....1...25T | s2cid = 253556114| doi-access = free }}{{primary source inline|date = July 2023}}
  • {{cite journal |vauthors=Taploo A, Soni V, Solomon H, McCraw M, Lin L, Spinelli J, Shepard S, Solares S, Keidar M |date=12 October 2023 |title=Characterization of a circular arc electron source for a self-neutralizing air-breathing plasma thruster |journal= Journal of Electric Propulsion |volume=2 |issue=21 |doi=10.1007/s44205-023-00058-7 |doi-access=free |bibcode=2023JElP....2...21T }}

{{Portal| Spaceflight }}

See also

References

{{reflist|2}}