Special right triangle

{{Short description|Right triangle with a feature making calculations on the triangle easier}}

{{Redirect2|45-45-90 triangle|30-60-90 triangle|the drawing tool|Set square}}

Image:Euler diagram of triangle types.svg of types of triangles, using the definition that isosceles triangles have at least two equal sides, i.e. that equilateral triangles are isosceles]]

A special right triangle is a right triangle with some regular feature that makes calculations on the triangle easier, or for which simple formulas exist. For example, a right triangle may have angles that form simple relationships, such as 45°–45°–90°. This is called an "angle-based" right triangle. A "side-based" right triangle is one in which the lengths of the sides form ratios of whole numbers, such as 3 : 4 : 5, or of other special numbers such as the golden ratio. Knowing the relationships of the angles or ratios of sides of these special right triangles allows one to quickly calculate various lengths in geometric problems without resorting to more advanced methods.

Angle-based

File:Special right triangles for trig.svg of multiples of 30 and 45 degrees.]]

Angle-based special right triangles are specified by the relationships of the angles of which the triangle is composed. The angles of these triangles are such that the larger (right) angle, which is 90 degrees or {{sfrac|{{pi}}|2}} radians, is equal to the sum of the other two angles.

The side lengths are generally deduced from the basis of the unit circle or other geometric methods. This approach may be used to rapidly reproduce the values of trigonometric functions for the angles 30°, 45°, and 60°.

Special triangles are used to aid in calculating common trigonometric functions, as below:

class="wikitable"

! degrees !! radians !! gons !! turns !! sin !! cos !! tan !! cotan

00g0{{sfrac|{{sqrt|0}}|2}} = 0{{sfrac|{{sqrt|4}}|2}} = 10undefined
30°{{sfrac|{{pi}}|6}}{{sfrac|33|1|3}}g{{sfrac|1|12}}{{sfrac|{{sqrt|1}}|2}} = {{sfrac|1|2}}{{sfrac|{{sqrt|3}}|2}}{{sfrac|1|{{radic|3}}}}{{sqrt|3}}
45°{{sfrac|{{pi}}|4}}50g{{sfrac|1|8}}{{sfrac|{{sqrt|2}}|2}} = {{sfrac|1|{{radic|2}}}}{{sfrac|{{sqrt|2}}|2}} = {{sfrac|1|{{radic|2}}}}11
60°{{sfrac|{{pi}}|3}}{{sfrac|66|2|3}}g{{sfrac|1|6}}{{sfrac|{{sqrt|3}}|2}}{{sfrac|{{sqrt|1}}|2}} = {{sfrac|1|2}}{{sqrt|3}}{{sfrac|1|{{radic|3}}}}
90°{{sfrac|{{pi}}|2}}100g{{sfrac|1|4}}{{sfrac|{{sqrt|4}}|2}} = 1{{sfrac|{{sqrt|0}}|2}} = 0undefined0

{{multiple image

| width = 120

| image1 = Tile V488 bicolor.svg

| caption1 = 45°–45°–90°

| image2 = Tile V46b.svg

| caption2 = 30°–60°–90°

}}

The 45°–45°–90° triangle, the 30°–60°–90° triangle, and the equilateral/equiangular (60°–60°–60°) triangle are the three Möbius triangles in the plane, meaning that they tessellate the plane via reflections in their sides; see Triangle group.

{{clear}}

={{anchor|45-45-90 triangle|90-45-45 triangle}}45°–45°–90° triangle=

File:Squadra 45.jpg shaped as 45°–45°–90° triangle]]

Image:45-45-triangle.svg

File:45° 45° 90° Special Right Triangle.svg of hypotenuse length 1]]

In plane geometry, dividing a square along its diagonal results in two isosceles right triangles, each with one right angle (90°, {{sfrac|{{pi}}|2}} radians) and two other congruent angles each measuring half of a right angle (45°, or {{sfrac|{{pi}}|4}} radians). The sides in this triangle are in the ratio 1 : 1 : {{sqrt|2}}, which follows immediately from the Pythagorean theorem.

Of all right triangles, such 45°–45°–90° degree triangles have the smallest ratio of the hypotenuse to the sum of the legs, namely {{sfrac|{{sqrt|2}}|2}}.Posamentier, Alfred S., and Lehman, Ingmar. The Secrets of Triangles. Prometheus Books, 2012.{{rp|p. 282, p. 358}} and the greatest ratio of the altitude from the hypotenuse to the sum of the legs, namely {{sfrac|{{sqrt|2}}|4}}.{{rp|p.282}}

Triangles with these angles are the only possible right triangles that are also isosceles triangles in Euclidean geometry. However, in spherical geometry and hyperbolic geometry, there are infinitely many different shapes of right isosceles triangles.

={{anchor|30-60-90 triangle|90-60-30 triangle}}30°–60°–90° triangle=

File:Squadra 30 60.jpg

File:Equilateral triangle with height square root of 3.svg

File:30° 60° 90° Special Right Triangle.svg of hypotenuse length 1]]

This is a triangle whose three angles are in the ratio 1 : 2 : 3 and respectively measure 30° ({{sfrac|{{pi}}|6}}), 60° ({{sfrac|{{pi}}|3}}), and 90° ({{sfrac|{{pi}}|2}}). The sides are in the ratio 1 : Square root of 3 : 2.

The proof of this fact is clear using trigonometry. The geometric proof is:

:Draw an equilateral triangle ABC with side length 2 and with point M as the midpoint of segment BC. Draw an altitude line from A to M. Then ABM is a 30°–60°–90° triangle with hypotenuse of length 2, and base BM of length 1.

:The fact that the remaining leg AM has length Square root of 3 follows immediately from the Pythagorean theorem.

The 30°–60°–90° triangle is the only right triangle whose angles are in an arithmetic progression. The proof of this fact is simple and follows on from the fact that if α, {{nowrap|α + δ}}, {{nowrap|α + 2δ}} are the angles in the progression then the sum of the angles {{nowrap|3α + 3δ}} = 180°. After dividing by 3, the angle {{nowrap|α + δ}} must be 60°. The right angle is 90°, leaving the remaining angle to be 30°.

Side-based

Right triangles whose sides are of integer lengths, with the sides collectively known as Pythagorean triples, possess angles that cannot all be rational numbers of degrees.{{Cite journal|title=Rational Triangle|last=Weisstein|first=Eric W|journal=MathWorld|url=http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RationalTriangle.html}} (This follows from Niven's theorem.) They are most useful in that they may be easily remembered and any multiple of the sides produces the same relationship. Using Euclid's formula for generating Pythagorean triples, the sides must be in the ratio

:{{nowrap|m{{sup|2}} − n{{sup|2}} : 2mn : m{{sup|2}} + n{{sup|2}}}}

where m and n are any positive integers such that {{nowrap|m > n}}.

=Common Pythagorean triples=

{{Main|Pythagorean triple}}

There are several Pythagorean triples which are well-known, including those with sides in the ratios:

:

border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0"

|align="right"|3 :

align="right"| 4 :align="right"| 5
align="right"|5 :align="right"|12 :align="right"|13
align="right"|8 :align="right"|15 :align="right"|17
align="right"|7 :align="right"|24 :align="right"|25
align="right"|9 :align="right"|40 :align="right"|41

The 3 : 4 : 5 triangles are the only right triangles with edges in arithmetic progression. Triangles based on Pythagorean triples are Heronian, meaning they have integer area as well as integer sides.

The possible use of the 3 : 4 : 5 triangle in Ancient Egypt, with the supposed use of a knotted rope to lay out such a triangle, and the question whether Pythagoras' theorem was known at that time, have been much debated.{{cite book |last=Cooke |first=Roger L. |title=The History of Mathematics: A Brief Course |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wOGh7XPowAMC |edition=2nd |year=2011|publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-03024-0 |pages=237–238}} It was first conjectured by the historian Moritz Cantor in 1882. It is known that right angles were laid out accurately in Ancient Egypt; that their surveyors did use ropes for measurement; that Plutarch recorded in Isis and Osiris (around 100 AD) that the Egyptians admired the 3 : 4 : 5 triangle; and that the Berlin Papyrus 6619 from the Middle Kingdom of Egypt (before 1700 BC) stated that "the area of a square of 100 is equal to that of two smaller squares. The side of one is {{sfrac|1|2}} + {{sfrac|1|4}} the side of the other."{{cite book |author=Gillings, Richard J. |title=Mathematics in the Time of the Pharaohs |url=https://archive.org/details/mathematicsintim0000gill |url-access=registration |publisher=Dover |date=1982 |page=[https://archive.org/details/mathematicsintim0000gill/page/161 161]}} The historian of mathematics Roger L. Cooke observes that "It is hard to imagine anyone being interested in such conditions without knowing the Pythagorean theorem." Against this, Cooke notes that no Egyptian text before 300 BC actually mentions the use of the theorem to find the length of a triangle's sides, and that there are simpler ways to construct a right angle. Cooke concludes that Cantor's conjecture remains uncertain: he guesses that the Ancient Egyptians probably did know the Pythagorean theorem, but that "there is no evidence that they used it to construct right angles".

The following are all the Pythagorean triple ratios expressed in lowest form (beyond the five smallest ones in lowest form in the list above) with both non-hypotenuse sides less than 256:

:

border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" align="left" style="margin-right: 2em"

|align="right"|11 :

align="right"| 60 :align="right"| 61
align="right"|12 :align="right"| 35 :align="right"| 37
align="right"|13 :align="right"| 84 :align="right"| 85
align="right"|15 :align="right"|112 :align="right"|113
align="right"|16 :align="right"| 63 :align="right"| 65
align="right"|17 :align="right"|144 :align="right"|145
align="right"|19 :align="right"|180 :align="right"|181
align="right"|20 :align="right"| 21 :align="right"| 29
align="right"|20 :align="right"| 99 :align="right"|101
align="right"|21 :align="right"|220 :align="right"|:221

border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" align="left" style="margin-right: 2em"

|align="right"| 24 :

align="right"|143 :align="right"|145
align="right"| 28 :align="right"| 45 :align="right"| 53
align="right"| 28 :align="right"|195 :align="right"|197
align="right"| 32 :align="right"|255 :align="right"|257
align="right"| 33 :align="right"| 56 :align="right"| 65
align="right"| 36 :align="right"| 77 :align="right"| 85
align="right"| 39 :align="right"| 80 :align="right"| 89
align="right"| 44 :align="right"|117 :align="right"|125
align="right"| 48 :align="right"| 55 :align="right"| 73
align="right"| 51 :align="right"|140 :align="right"|149

border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" align="left" style="margin-right: 2em"

|align="right"| 52 :

align="right"|165 :align="right"|173
align="right"| 57 :align="right"|176 :align="right"|185
align="right"| 60 :align="right"| 91 :align="right"|109
align="right"| 60 :align="right"|221 :align="right"|229
align="right"| 65 :align="right"| 72 :align="right"| 97
align="right"| 84 :align="right"|187 :align="right"|205
align="right"| 85 :align="right"|132 :align="right"|157
align="right"| 88 :align="right"|105 :align="right"|137
align="right"| 95 :align="right"|168 :align="right"|193
align="right"| 96 :align="right"|247 :align="right"|265

border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0"

|align="right"|104 :

align="right"|153 :align="right"|185
align="right"|105 :align="right"|208 :align="right"|233
align="right"|115 :align="right"|252 :align="right"|277
align="right"|119 :align="right"|120 :align="right"|169
align="right"|120 :align="right"|209 :align="right"|241
align="right"|133 :align="right"|156 :align="right"|205
align="right"|140 :align="right"|171 :align="right"|221
align="right"|160 :align="right"|231 :align="right"|281
align="right"|161 :align="right"|240 :align="right"|289
align="right"|204 :align="right"|253 :align="right"|325
align="right"|207 :align="right"|224 :align="right"|305

{{clear}}

=Almost-isosceles Pythagorean triples=

Isosceles right-angled triangles cannot have sides with integer values, because the ratio of the hypotenuse to either other side is {{sqrt|2}} and Square root of 2#Proofs of irrationality. However, infinitely many almost-isosceles right triangles do exist. These are right-angled triangles with integer sides for which the lengths of the non-hypotenuse edges differ by one.{{citation

| last1 = Forget | first1 = T. W.

| last2 = Larkin | first2 = T. A.

| issue = 3

| journal = Fibonacci Quarterly

| pages = 94–104

| title = Pythagorean triads of the form x, x + 1, z described by recurrence sequences

| url = http://www.fq.math.ca/Scanned/6-3/6-3/forget.pdf

| volume = 6

| year = 1968| doi = 10.1080/00150517.1968.12431232

}}.{{citation

| last1 = Chen | first1 = C. C.

| last2 = Peng | first2 = T. A.

| journal = The Australasian Journal of Combinatorics

| mr = 1327342

| pages = 263–267

| title = Almost-isosceles right-angled triangles

| url = http://ajc.maths.uq.edu.au/pdf/11/ajc-v11-p263.pdf

| volume = 11

| year = 1995}}. Such almost-isosceles right-angled triangles can be obtained recursively,

:a0 = 1, b0 = 2

:an = 2bn−1 + an−1

:bn = 2an + bn−1

an is length of hypotenuse, n = 1, 2, 3, .... Equivalently,

:(\tfrac{x-1}{2})^2+(\tfrac{x+1}{2})^2 = y^2

where {x, y} are solutions to the Pell equation {{nowrap|x{{sup|2}} − 2y{{sup|2}} {{=}} −1}}, with the hypotenuse y being the odd terms of the Pell numbers 1, 2, 5, 12, 29, 70, 169, 408, 985, 2378... {{OEIS|id=A000129}}.. The smallest Pythagorean triples resulting are:{{OEIS|A001652}}

:

border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" align="left" style="margin-right: 3em"

|align="right"| 3 :

align="right"| 4 :align="right"| 5
align="right"| 20 :align="right"| 21 :align="right"| 29
align="right"| 119 :align="right"| 120 :align="right"| 169
align="right"| 696 :align="right"| 697 :align="right"| 985

border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" align="left"

|align="right"| 4,059 :

align="right"| 4,060 :align="right"| 5,741
align="right"| 23,660 :align="right"| 23,661 :align="right"| 33,461
align="right"| 137,903 :align="right"| 137,904 :align="right"| 195,025
align="right"| 803,760 :align="right"| 803,761 :align="right"| 1,136,689

{{clear}}

Alternatively, the same triangles can be derived from the square triangular numbers.{{citation

| last = Nyblom | first = M. A.

| issue = 4

| journal = The Fibonacci Quarterly

| mr = 1640364

| pages = 319–322

| title = A note on the set of almost-isosceles right-angled triangles

| url = http://www.fq.math.ca/Scanned/36-4/nyblom.pdf

| volume = 36

| year = 1998| doi = 10.1080/00150517.1998.12428915

}}.

=Arithmetic and geometric progressions=

File:Kepler triangle.svg.]]

{{Main article|Kepler triangle}}

The Kepler triangle is a right triangle whose sides are in geometric progression. If the sides are formed from the geometric progression a, ar, ar2 then its common ratio r is given by r = {{sqrt|φ}} where φ is the golden ratio. Its sides are therefore in the ratio {{nowrap|1 : {{sqrt|φ}} : φ}}. Thus, the shape of the Kepler triangle is uniquely determined (up to a scale factor) by the requirement that its sides be in geometric progression.

The 3–4–5 triangle is the unique right triangle (up to scaling) whose sides are in arithmetic progression.{{citation

| last1 = Beauregard | first1 = Raymond A.

| last2 = Suryanarayan | first2 = E. R.

| doi = 10.2307/2691431

| issue = 2

| journal = Mathematics Magazine

| mr = 1448883

| pages = 105–115

| title = Arithmetic triangles

| volume = 70

| year = 1997| jstor = 2691431

}}.

=Sides of regular polygons=

File:Euclid XIII.10.svg circles, form a right triangle.]]

Let a=2\sin\frac{\pi}{10}=\frac{-1+\sqrt5}{2}=\frac1\varphi\approx 0.618 be the side length of a regular decagon inscribed in the unit circle, where \varphi is the golden ratio. Let b=2\sin\frac{\pi}{6}=1 be the side length of a regular hexagon in the unit circle, and let c=2\sin\frac{\pi}{5}=\sqrt{\frac{5-\sqrt5}{2}}\approx 1.176 be the side length of a regular pentagon in the unit circle. Then a^2+b^2=c^2, so these three lengths form the sides of a right triangle.[http://aleph0.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/bookXIII/propXIII10.html Euclid's Elements, Book XIII, Proposition 10]. The same triangle forms half of a golden rectangle. It may also be found within a regular icosahedron of side length c: the shortest line segment from any vertex V to the plane of its five neighbors has length a, and the endpoints of this line segment together with any of the neighbors of V form the vertices of a right triangle with sides a, b, and c.[http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/pentagon+decagon+hexagon+identity nLab: pentagon decagon hexagon identity].

See also

References