St Martin's Lane Academy

In Britain in the early eighteenth century there was no organised public official patronage of the arts, aside from commissions for specific projects. There was no established body to compare with the Académie royale de peinture et de sculpture that Jean-Baptiste Colbert had established in France, and no public exhibitions of recent paintings along the lines of the Paris salons, held every other year.

The closest approximation to an academic life-drawing class was established in Great Queen Street in 1711 under twelve directors, with Sir Godfrey Kneller as its governor. George Vertue, a founder-member, describes it as "the Academy of Painting", although there is no evidence that any painting was ever done there. Sir James Thornhill took over from Kneller in 1718, but a few years later, after a period of infighting, he started a new academy, conducting life-drawing classes from a room he added to his own house in James Street, Covent Garden, from 1724William Sandby, The History of the Royal Academy of Arts from Its Foundation in 1768 (London: Longmans, Green) 1862:21. while a faction led by John Vanderbank and Louis Chéron set up what they advertised as "The Academy for the Improvement of Painters and Sculptors by drawing from the Naked" at premises in St Martin's Lane. It proved popular, but failed after a few years when the subscriptions were embezzled by the treasurer. Thornhill continued his life-classes until his death in May 1734, but had little success in finding subscribers. Hogarth, (who was Thornhill's son-in-law) attributed its failure at least in part to the competition from Vanderbank and Cheron.

It was Hogarth who established the St. Martin's Lane Academy in 1735, using the equipment from Thornhill's studio, and he remained its central figure. It is sometimes referred to as the "Second St Martin's Lane Academy", to differentiate it from that of Vanderbank and Chéron. Hogarth wrote an account of its formation in about 1760,An excerpt is in Sandby:1862: in which he takes credit for the democratic principle that all should contribute an equal sum to the Academy's expenses and have an equal vote, "attributing the failure of the previous academies to the leading members having assumed a superiority which their fellow-students could not brook." Thus the academy abandoned hierarchic seventeenth-century precedents and was formed on the basis of a club.{{citation needed|date=July 2012}} The members of the academy took turns to "set" the model – that is decide his or her pose – rather than having this done by a paid director of the sort employed in French academies. Hogarth was opposed to copying from pictures, but there may have been casts to work from, inherited from Thornhill's studio.{{cite book|first=Rica|last=Jones|chapter=The Artist's Training and Technique|title=Manners and Morals|publisher=Tate Gallery|location=London|year=1987|pages=19–24}} The premises of the Academy were a large room in Peter's Court, entered from St Martin's Lane through a low vaulted passageway.An engraving of it as it was in the mid nineteenth century was published in Sandby 1862:23.

The membership of the academy was formed from an informal, club-like circle that was in the habit of meeting at Old Slaughter's Coffee House, which had been at 74 and 75, St. Martin's Lane since 1692, when the neighbourhood was still distinctly suburban.The building was demolished in 1843when Cranbourn Street was opened. (Survey of London 20 (1940:117 and pl. 120. It was known as"Old" Slaughter's Coffee House after 1742,{{Citation

|first=John

|last=Timbs

|title=Clubs and club life in London

|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tBgHAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA352

|year=1872

|publisher=John Camden Hotten

|location=London

|pages=352–356

|chapter=Slaughter's Coffee-house}} when a new Slaughter's Coffee House opened, at no. 82 (more recently the site of Westminster County Court).Griffith 1983 note 28;

Hogarth seems to have had some assistance in running the academy.George Vertue noted early in 1745 "The academy for the study of painting & other artists [sic] is carryd on and conducted by several, Ellis, Hayman, Gravelot, Wills— &c..." Of these four named by Vertue, the most obscure is James Wills (working c. 1740–1777), later the Rev. James Wills. In 1754 he made a

translation of du Fresnoy's stilted and old-fashioned Latin poem on the art of painting, De arte graphica, which did not meet a successful reception.Edwards 1808 found it "dry and literal". but which apparently identifies Wills as the "Fresnoy" who published bitterly sarcastic invective at Sir Joshua Reynolds and artists like Zoffany who had left the Society of Artists to join the newly founded Royal Academy.Whitley 1928:ii.272–79 makes the identification with Wills and prints some of the characteristically vituperative public letters of "Fresnoy". His conversation piece The Andrews Family (signed "J. Wills pinxit" and dated 1749) is in the collection of the Fitzwilliam Museum.Vertue Note-Books (The Walpole Society) 22 p 123. Edward Edwards' continuation of Walpole's Anecdotes of Painters (1808:55) notes that Wills had painted some portraits and historical subjects, "but not meeting much success in his profession he quit it, and having received a liberal education, took orders. He was for some years curate at Cannons, Middlesex, where the prominent cabinet-maker of St. Martin's Lane William Hallett had built a residence on part of the foundations of the great demolished house. In 1772 Wills was appointed to the living at Canons by Hallett's grandson, the subject, with his wife, of Gainsborough's The Morning Walk (1787).W.T. Whitley, Artists and Their Friends (1928), vol II:275; Ralph Edwards and Margaret Jourdain, Georgian Cabinet-Makers (London: Faber and Faber) 1955, s.v. "William Hallett").

Hogarth's involvement with the academy began to decline in 1753, following the circulation by its secretary, Francis Milner Newton, of a letter calling a meeting with the intention of electing 24 artists as professors of a putative public academy. Hogarth had long been opposed to the idea of such an institution. Newton's plans came to nothing, and the academy continued, under Francis Hayman and George Michael Moser. Moser moved the school to Pall Mall in 1767, and it closed four years later, when he became the first keeper of the Royal Academy.

Among the members of the St. Martin's Lane Academy were the engraver and book illustrator Hubert Gravelot; François Roubiliac, a French sculptor established in London; the painter Francis Hayman and his pupil, the very young Thomas Gainsborough who was employed by Gravelot; the Swiss-born artist and enameller George Michael Moser; the medallist Richard Yeo and the architect Isaac Ware. Desmond Fitz-Gerald notes that an asterisk in the list of subscribers to Joshua Kirby's, Dr Brook Taylor's Method of Perspective Made Easy (London 1754) identifies members of the St. Martin's Lane Academy, and notes as further members the architect James Paine; Charles, son of Henry Cheere, sculptor; and Johann Sebastian Müller, an engraver of Chippendale's Director.Fitz-Gerald, "Chipppendale's place in the English rococo", Furniture History 4 (1969:1–9); the full list from this source has not been published.

An unexpected member of the circle was James Stuart, trained as a painter but familiar as one of the earliest practitioners of Neoclassicism in Europe; that later phase was far in the future when he moved in the Academy's milieu, introduced by the engravers Louis and Joseph Goupy, both of whom were members.Kerry Bristol, "A Newly-Discovered Drawing by James Stuart", Architectural History 44 Essays in Architectural History Presented to John Newman (2001:39–44) p. 42 and note; Bristol notes the connection from Stuart's obituary in The Gentleman's Magazine in 1788.

The painters involved in the academy were reacting against the Italianate Late Baroque manner exemplified by Thornhill himself,Edward Croft-Murray, Decorative Painting in England, while the designers were developing alternatives to the cool Neo-Palladianism being espoused at the time by Lord Burlington and William Kent; the rococo artists found patrons, as Mark Girouard first noted, in the circle that formed around Frederick, Prince of Wales in Leicester Square.

==Old Slaughter's Coffee House==

Not all the artists in St. Martin's Lane were members of the Academy. Matthew Lock, the draughtsman and engraver who engraved most of the designs for Chippendale's Director, advertised in 1748 that he was offering evening drawing-classes for tradesmen and students in his premises "Facing Old Slaughter's Coffee House".Christopher Gilbert, The Life and Work of Thomas Chippendale (London/New York: Macmillan) 1966:7. and Thomas Chippendale, the most famous maker of English rococo furniture, seem never to have joined.Fitz-Gerald 1968 attempts to make a connection through connections to subscribers to The Director, but unsuccessfully, according to Gilbert 1968 and Geoffrey de Bellaigue, reviewing Gilbert in The Burlington Magazine 122 No. 927 (June 1980:441).

Other French Protestant emigrés were drawn to the mix of English and foreigners at Slaughter's. Abraham de Moivre, friend of Newton and Halley, eked out a meagre existence as a tutor, spending evening hours at Slaughter's.He worked out his theory of the normal probability curve, which he published in the 1738 edition of the Doctrine of Chances; for Moivre and the abstract theory of the curve, see Helen M. Walker, "Bi-Centenary of the Normal Curve" Journal of the American Statistical Association 29 No. 185 (March 1934:72–75); Moivre noted at Slaughter's p 75. at the time chiefly interesting to gamblers seeking to maximise their odds rather than to statisticians. Other intellectuals were drawn to the atmosphere of Slaughter's: Joseph Priestley met in a virtual "Slaughter's Club" with Josiah Wedgwood, Captain Cook and Sir Joseph Banks.William P. Griffith, "Priestley in London" Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 38.1 (August 1983:5.

The presence of several outstanding cabinetmakers in St. Martin's Lane was influential in translating Rococo designs into furnishings. In December 1753, directly across from Old Slaughter's Thomas Chippendale took a long lease on three houses that served as his premises for the rest of his career.Gilbert 1966:9. A chance remark establishes that the cabinet-maker John Linnell attended life-classes at the St. Martin's Lane Academy,Desmond Fitz-Gerald, "Chipppendale's place in the English rococo", Furniture History 4 (1969:1–9). and William Hallett also had workshops in the Lane.

In the 1760s Old Slaughter's Coffee House was the place where the Italian painter Antonio Zucchi, brought to London by Robert Adam, formed a friendship with the literary intellectual Jean-Paul Marat, "a man of extensive classical learning who continually proposed subjects which he had selected for Zucchi to design", the painter Joseph Farington noted in his diary, after Marat's subsequent revolutionary career had run its course;(Joseph Farington) James Greig, ed., The Farington Diary (London) 1922: vol I:24, entry for December 1803. Marat came to Zucchi's house "in the most familiar manner, a knife and fork laid for him every day."Noted by Carol M. Osborne, "The Zucchi Sketchbook" The Huntington Library Quarterly 42.3 (Summer 1979:263–269) p. 268. At a later date it was "over a Neck of Veal and Potatoes, at the Old Slaughter Coffee House",David Williams (1738–1816), founder of the Royal Literary Fund recalled later (David Williams, "More Light on Franklin's Religious Ideas", The American Historical Review 43.4 [July 1938:803–813] p. 810.) The Honest Whigs are discussed by Verner W. Crane, "The Club of Honest Whigs: Friends of Science and Liberty" The William and Mary Quarterly 3rd Series 23.2 (April 1966:210–233). that the liberal scientific Club of Honest Whigs, centred on the figure of Benjamin Franklin was formed.

The artistic circle meeting at Old Slaughter's Coffee House was revived from its obscurity in a series of articles by Mark Girouard.Girouard, "English art and the rococo, I–III: Coffee at Slaughter's; Hogarth and his friends; the two worlds of St Martin's Lane", Country Life 139 (13, 27 January and 3 February 1966), pp 58–61; 188–90; 224–27.

{{reflist|2}}

{{coord |51|30|42|N|0|7|38.4|W|type:landmark_region:GB|display=title}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Saint Martin's Lane Academy}}

Category:Art schools in London

Category:Culture in London

Category:18th century in London

Category:1735 establishments in England