Stoicism#Physics

{{seealso|List of Stoic philosophers}}

The name Stoicism derives from the Stoa Poikile (Ancient Greek: ἡ ποικίλη στοά), or "painted porch", a colonnade decorated with mythic and historical battle scenes on the north side of the Agora in Athens where Zeno of Citium and his followers gathered to discuss their ideas, near the end of the fourth century BC.{{cite book | last = Becker | first = Lawrence | title = A History of Western Ethics | publisher = Routledge | location = New York | year = 2003 | isbn = 978-0415968256 |page=27}} Unlike the Epicureans, Zeno chose to teach his philosophy in a public space. Stoicism was originally known as Zenonism. However, this name was soon dropped, likely because the Stoics did not consider their founders to be perfectly wise and to avoid the risk of the philosophy becoming a cult of personality.{{Cite book|title=Stoicism and the Art of Happiness|last=Robertson|first=Donald|publisher=John Murray| year= 2018| location=Great Britain}}

Zeno's ideas developed from those of the Cynics (brought to him by Crates of Thebes), whose founding father, Antisthenes, had been a disciple of Socrates. Zeno's most influential successor was Chrysippus, who followed Cleanthes as leader of the school, and was responsible for molding what is now called Stoicism.{{cite web |title=Chrysippus {{!}} Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |url=https://iep.utm.edu/chrysippus/ |access-date=31 August 2023 |archive-date=9 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231009152625/https://iep.utm.edu/chrysippus/ |url-status=live }} Stoicism became the foremost popular philosophy among the educated elite in the Hellenistic world and the Roman Empire{{cite book|title=These Were the Greeks|last=Amos|first=H.|publisher=Dufour Editions|year=1982|isbn=978-0802312754|location=Chester Springs|oclc=9048254}} to the point where, in the words of Gilbert Murray, "nearly all the successors of Alexander [...] professed themselves Stoics".Gilbert Murray, The Stoic Philosophy (1915), p. 25. In Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy (1946). Later Roman Stoics focused on promoting a life in harmony within the universe within which we are active participants.

ScholarsSedley, D. (2003) The School, from Zeno to Arius Didymus. In: B. Inwood (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge University Press. usually divide the history of Stoicism into three phases: the Early Stoa, from Zeno's founding to Antipater; the Middle Stoa, including Panaetius and Posidonius; and the Late Stoa, including Musonius Rufus, Seneca, Epictetus, and Marcus Aurelius. No complete works survived from the first two phases of Stoicism. Only Roman texts from the Late Stoa survived.A.A.Long, Hellenistic Philosophy, p. 115.

{{See also|History of logic}}

File:Chrysippos BM 1846.jpg, the third leader of the Stoic school, wrote more than 300 books on logic. His works were lost, but an outline of his logical system may be reconstructed from fragments and testimony.]]

{{anchor|logic}}

For the Stoics, logic (logike) was the part of philosophy which examined reason (logos).{{Harvnb|Sellars|2006|p=55}} To achieve a happy life—a life worth living—requires logical thought. The Stoics held that an understanding of ethics was impossible without logic.{{Harvnb|Shenefelt|White|2013|p=78}} In the words of Inwood, the Stoics believed that:{{Harvnb|Inwood|2003|p=229}}

{{blockquote|Logic helps a person see what is the case, reason effectively about practical affairs, stand his or her ground amid confusion, differentiate the certain from the probable, and so forth.}}

To the Stoics, logic was a wide field of knowledge which included the study of language, grammar, rhetoric and epistemology. However, all of these fields were interrelated, and the Stoics developed their logic (or "dialectic") within the context of their theory of language and epistemology.{{Harvnb|O'Toole|Jennings|2004|p=400}}

The Stoic tradition of logic originated in the 4th-century BCE in a different school of philosophy known as the Megarian school.{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1996a|p=880}} It was two dialecticians of this school, Diodorus Cronus and his pupil Philo, who developed their own theories of modalities and of conditional propositions. The founder of Stoicism, Zeno of Citium, studied under the Megarians and he was said to have been a fellow pupil with Philo.{{Harvnb|Sellars|2006|p=56}}

However, the outstanding figure in the development of Stoic logic was Chrysippus of Soli (c. 279 – c. 206 BCE), the third head of the Stoic school. Chrysippus shaped much of Stoic logic as we know it creating a system of propositional logic.{{Harvnb|Shenefelt|White|2013|p=80}} The logical writings by Chrysippus are, however, almost entirely lost, instead his system has to be reconstructed from the partial and incomplete accounts preserved in the works of later authors.

The smallest unit in Stoic logic is an assertible({{transliteration|grc|axiomata}}), a proposition which is either true or false and which either affirms or denies.{{Harvnb|Sellars|2006|p=58}} Examples of assertibles include "it is night", "it is raining this afternoon", and "no one is walking."{{Harvnb|Sellars|2006|pp=58–59}}{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=102}} Assertibles have a truth-value such that they are only true or false depending on when it was expressed (e.g. the assertible "it is night" will only be true if it is true that it is night).{{sfn|Bobzien|1999|pp=95}} The Stoics catalogued these simple assertibles according to whether they are affirmative or negative, and whether they are definite or indefinite (or both).{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|pp=97–98}}

Compound assertibles can be built up from simple ones through the use of logical connectives, which examine choice and consequence such as "if ... then", "either ... or", and "not both".{{Harvnb|Shenefelt|White|2013|p=79}} Chrysippus seems to have been responsible for introducing the three main types of connectives: the conditional (if), conjunctive (and), and disjunctive (or).{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=105}} A typical conditional takes the form of "if p then q";{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=106}} whereas a conjunction takes the form of "both p and q"; and a disjunction takes the form of "either p or q".{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=109}} The or they used is exclusive, unlike the inclusive or generally used in modern formal logic.{{Harvnb|Inwood|2003|p=231}} These connectives are combined with the use of not for negation.{{Harvnb|Sellars|2006|p=60}} Thus the conditional can take the following four forms:{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=129}} 1) "If p, then q" 2) "If not p, then q" 3) "If p, then not q" 4) "If not p, then not q." Later Stoics added more connectives: the pseudo-conditional took the form of "since p then q"; and the causal assertible took the form of "because p then q".{{Ref label|A|a|none}} There was also a comparative (or dissertive): "more/less (likely) p than q".{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|pp=109–111}}

Assertibles can also be distinguished by their modal properties{{Ref label|B|b|none}}—whether they are possible, impossible, necessary, or non-necessary.{{Harvnb|Sellars|2006|p=59}} In this the Stoics were building on an earlier Megarian debate initiated by Diodorus Cronus. Diodorus had defined possibility in a way which seemed to adopt a form of fatalism.{{Harvnb|Adamson|2015|p=136}} Diodorus defined possible as "that which either is or will be true".{{harvnb|Bobzien|2020}} Thus there are no possibilities that are forever unrealised, whatever is possible is or one day will be true. His pupil Philo, rejecting this, defined possible as "that which is capable of being true by the proposition's own nature", thus a statement like "this piece of wood can burn" is possible, even if it spent its entire existence on the bottom of the ocean.{{Harvnb|Adamson|2015|p=138}} Chrysippus, on the other hand, was a causal determinist: he thought that true causes inevitably give rise to their effects and that all things arise in this way.{{Harvnb|Adamson|2015|p=58}} But he was not a logical determinist or fatalist: he wanted to distinguish between possible and necessary truths. Thus he took a middle position between Diodorus and Philo, combining elements of both their modal systems.{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=120}} Chrysippus's set of Stoic modal definitions was as follows:{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=118}}

In Stoic logic, an argument is defined as a compound or system of premises and a conclusion. {{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=121}} A typical Stoic syllogism is: "If it is day, it is light; It is day; Therefore it is light". It has a non-simple assertible for the first premise ("If it is day, it is light") and a simple assertible for the second premise ("It is day"). Stoic logic also uses variables which stand for propositions in order to generalize arguments of the same form.{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1996a|p=881}} In more general terms this argument would be: "If p, then q; p; Therefore q."

Chrysippus listed five basic argument forms, called indemonstrables,{{Harvnb|Mates|1953|pages=67–73 }}{{Ref label|C|c|none}} which all other arguments are reducible to:{{Harvnb|Ierodiakonou|2006|p=678}}

There can be many variations of these five indemonstrable arguments.{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=128}} For example the assertibles in the premises can be more complex, and the following syllogism is a valid example of the second indemonstrable (modus tollens): "if both p and q, then r; not r; therefore not: both p and q" Similarly one can incorporate negation into these arguments. A valid example of the fourth indemonstrable (strong modus tollendo ponens or exclusive disjunctive syllogism) is:{{Harvnb|Shenefelt|White|2013|p=87}} "either [not p] or q; not [not p]; therefore q" which, incorporating the principle of double negation, is equivalent to: "either [not p] or q; p; therefore q."

However, many other arguments are not expressed in the form of the five indemonstrables, and the task is to show how they can be reduced to one of the five types. A simple example of Stoic reduction is reported by Sextus Empiricus:{{Harvnb|Ierodiakonou|2009|p=521}} "if both p and q, then r; not r; but also p; Therefore not q" This can be reduced to two separate indemonstrable arguments of the second and third type:{{Harvnb|Ierodiakonou|2009|p=522}} "if both p and q, then r; not r; therefore not: both p and q; not: both p and q; p; therefore not q"

The Stoics stated that complex syllogisms could be reduced to the indemonstrables through the use of four ground rules or themata.{{Harvnb|Bobzien|1996b|p=133}} Of these four themata, only two have survived.{{Harvnb|Kneale|Kneale|1962|p=169}} One, the so-called first thema, was a rule of antilogism: "When from two [assertibles] a third follows, then from either of them together with the contradictory of the conclusion the contradictory of the other follows."Apuleius, De Interpretatione 209. 9–14) The other, the third thema, was a cut rule by which chain syllogisms could be reduced to simple syllogisms.{{Ref label|E|e|none}} The importance of these rules is not altogether clear.{{Harvnb|Barnes|1997|p=82}} In the 2nd-century BCE Antipater of Tarsus is said to have introduced a simpler method involving the use of fewer themata, although few details survive concerning this.

{{quote box

| bgcolor = #d6ebff

|width=20em

| quote = Why should not the philosopher develop his own reason? You turn to vessels of crystal, I to the syllogism called The Liar; you to myrrhine glassware, I to the syllogism called The Denyer.

|source=–Epictetus, Discourses, iii.9.20

}}

In addition to describing which inferences are valid ones, part of a Stoic's logical training was the enumeration and refutation of false arguments, including the identification of paradoxes,{{Harvnb|Inwood|2003|p=232}} which represented a challenge to the basic logical notions of the Stoics such as truth or falsehood.{{Harvnb|Ierodiakonou|2009|p=525}} One paradox studied by Chrysippus, known as the Liar paradox, asked "A man says he is lying; is what he says true or false?"—if the man says something true then it seems he is lying, but if he is lying then he is not saying something true, and so on. Another, known as the Sorites paradox or "Heap" asked "How many grains of wheat do you need before you get a heap?" It was said to challenge the idea of true or false by offering up the possibility of vagueness.{{Harvnb|Ierodiakonou|2009|p=526}} In mastering these paradoxes, the Stoics hoped to cultivate their rational powers,{{Harvnb|Long|2001|p=95}} in order to more easily enable ethical reflection, permit secure and confident arguing, and lead themselves to truth.{{harvnb|Nussbaum|2009}}

The Stoics held that all beings ({{lang|grc|ὄντα}})—although not all things (τινά)—are material.Jacques Brunschwig, Stoic Metaphysics in The Cambridge Companion to Stoics, ed. B. Inwood, Cambridge, 2006, pp. 206–232 Besides the existing beings they admitted four incorporeals (asomata): time, place, void, and sayable.Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Mathematicos 10.218. (chronos, topos, kenon, lekton) They were held to be just 'subsisting' while such a status was denied to universals.Marcelo D. Boeri, The Stoics on Bodies and Incorporeals, The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 54, No. 4 (Jun., 2001), pp. 723–752 Thus, they accepted Anaxagoras's idea (as did Aristotle) that if an object is hot, it is because some part of a universal heat body had entered the object. But, unlike Aristotle, they extended the idea to cover all chance incidents. Thus, if an object is red, it would be because some part of a universal red body had entered the object.

They held that there were four categories:

1. Substance ({{lang|grc|ὑποκείμενον}}): The primary matter, formless substance, (ousia) that things are made of
2. Quality ({{lang|grc|ποιόν}}): The way matter is organized to form an individual object; in Stoic physics, a physical ingredient (pneuma: air or breath), which informs the matter
3. Somehow disposed ({{lang|grc|πως ἔχον}}): Particular characteristics, not present within the object, such as size, shape, action, and posture
4. Somehow disposed in relation to something ({{lang|grc|πρός τί πως ἔχον}}): Characteristics related to other phenomena, such as the position of an object within time and space relative to other objects

A simple example of the Stoic categories in use is provided by Jacques Brunschwig:

{{Blockquote|I am a certain lump of matter, and thereby a substance, an existent something (and thus far that is all); I am a man, and this individual man that I am, and thereby qualified by a common quality and a peculiar one; I am sitting or standing, disposed in a certain way; I am the father of my children, the fellow citizen of my fellow citizens, disposed in a certain way in relation to something else.Jacques Brunschwig "Stoic Metaphysics", p. 228 in Brad Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 206–232.}}

According to the Stoics, knowledge can be attained through the application of reason to the impressions (phantasiai) received by the mind by the senses. The mind has the ability to judge (συγκατάθεσις, synkatathesis)—approve or reject—an impression, enabling it to distinguish a true representation of reality from one that is false. Some impressions can be assented to immediately, but others can achieve only varying degrees of hesitant approval, which can be labeled belief or opinion (doxa). It is only through reason that we gain clear comprehension and conviction (katalepsis). Certainty and true knowledge (episteme), achievable by the Stoic sage, can be attained only by verifying the conviction with the expertise of one's peers and the collective judgment of humankind.

{{anchor|Physics}}

File:L'Image et le Pouvoir - Buste cuirassé de Marc Aurèle agé - 3.jpg, the Stoic Roman emperor.]]

According to the Stoics, the Universe is a material reasoning substance (logos), which was divided into two classes: the active and the passive.{{cite book |last=Karamanolis |first=George E. |year=2013 |chapter=Free will and divine providence |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZVdsBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA151 |title=The Philosophy of Early Christianity |location=New York and London |publisher=Routledge |edition=1st |series=Ancient Philosophies |page=151 |isbn=978-1844655670 |access-date=18 November 2021 |archive-date=8 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230708182043/https://books.google.com/books?id=ZVdsBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA151 |url-status=live }} The passive substance is matter itself, while the active substance is an intelligent aether or primordial fire, which acts on the passive matter, the logos or anima mundi pervading and animating the entire Universe. It was conceived as material and is usually identified with God or Nature. The Stoics also referred to the seminal reason ("logos spermatikos"), or the law of generation in the Universe, which was the principle of the active reason working in inanimate matter. Humans, too, each possess a portion of the divine logos, which is the primordial Fire and reason that controls and sustains the Universe.Tripolitis, A., Religions of the Hellenistic-Roman Age, pp. 37–38. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. Everything is subject to the laws of Fate, for the Universe acts according to its own nature, and the nature of the passive matter it governs.

Stoicism does not posit a beginning or end to the Universe.Ferguson, Everett. Backgrounds of Early Christianity. 2003, p. 368. The current Universe is a phase in the present cycle, preceded by an infinite number of Universes, doomed to be destroyed (("Ekpyrosis"), conflagration) and re-created again,Michael Lapidge, Stoic Cosmology, in: John M. Rist, The Stoics, Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 182–183. and to be followed by another infinite number of Universes.

File:Seneca-berlinantikensammlung-1.jpg, a Stoic philosopher from the Roman empire who served as an adviser to Nero.]]

Alongside Aristotle's ethics, the Stoic tradition forms one of the major founding approaches to virtue ethics.Sharpe, Matthew, [http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30059463/sharpe-stoicvirtue-2013.pdf Stoic Virtue Ethics] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181113015946/http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30059463/sharpe-stoicvirtue-2013.pdf |date=13 November 2018 }}, Handbook of Virtue Ethics, 2013, 28–41 The Stoics believed that the practice of virtue is enough to achieve eudaimonia: a well-lived life. The Stoics identified the path to achieving it with a life spent practicing the four cardinal virtues in everyday life — prudence, fortitude, temperance, and justice — as well as living in accordance with nature.

The Stoics are especially known for teaching that "virtue is the only good" for human beings, and that external things, such as health, wealth, and pleasure, are not good or bad in themselves (adiaphora) but have value as "material for virtue to act upon". Many Stoics —such as Seneca and Epictetus — emphasized that because "virtue is sufficient for happiness", a sage would be emotionally resilient to misfortune. The Stoics also believed that certain destructive emotions resulted from errors of judgment, and people should aim to maintain a will (called prohairesis) that is "in accordance with nature". Because of this, the Stoics thought the best indication of an individual's philosophy was not what a person said but how the person behaved.John Sellars. Stoicism, 2006, p. 32.

The Stoics outlined that our own actions, thoughts, and reactions are within our control. These suggest a space that is up to us or within our power. Stoic ethics involves improving the individual's ethical and moral well-being: "Virtue consists in a will that is in agreement with Nature."Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy, p. 254 The foundation of Stoic ethics is that good lies in the state of the soul itself, in wisdom and self-control. For the Stoics, reason meant using logic and understanding the processes of nature—the logos or universal reason, inherent in all things, as a means of overcoming destructive emotions. {{cite book | last = Graver | first = Margaret | title = Stoicism and Emotion | publisher = University of Chicago Press | location = Chicago | year = 2009 | isbn = 978-0226305585 |oclc=430497127}} This principle also applies to the realm of interpersonal relationships; "to be free from anger, envy, and jealousy",Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy, p. 264 and even to accept slaves as equals of others because all are products of nature.Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy, p. 253. The Stoic ethic espouses a deterministic perspective; in regard to those who lack Stoic virtue, Cleanthes once opined that the wicked person is "like a dog tied to a cart, and compelled to go wherever it goes". A Stoic of virtue, by contrast, would amend one's will to suit the world and remain, in the words of Epictetus, "sick and yet happy, in peril and yet happy, dying and yet happy, in exile and happy, in disgrace and happy", thus positing a "completely autonomous" individual will, and at the same time a universe that is "a rigidly deterministic single whole".

For the Stoic Chrysippus, the passions are evaluative judgements.{{Cite journal |last1=Groenendijk |first1=L.F. |last2=de Ruyter |first2=D.J. |date=2009 |title=Learning from Seneca: A Stoic perspective on the art of living and education |url=https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/learning-from-seneca-a-stoic-perspective-on-the-art-of-living-and |journal=Ethics and Education |volume=4 |pages=81–92 |doi=10.1080/17449640902816277 |s2cid=143758851| url-access=subscription|issn=1744-9642 |access-date=5 July 2023 |archive-date=2 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221202183712/https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/learning-from-seneca-a-stoic-perspective-on-the-art-of-living-and |url-status=live }} A passion is a disturbing and misleading force in the mind which occurs because of a failure to reason correctly.{{sfn|Annas|1994|pp=103–104}} The Stoics used the word to discuss many common emotions such as anger, fear and excessive joy.{{sfn|Annas|1994|pp=103–104}} Incorrect judgement as to a present good gives rise to delight, while lust is a wrong estimate about the future.{{sfn|Annas|1994|pp=103–104}} Unreal imaginings of evil cause distress about the present, or fear for the future.{{sfn|Capes|1880|pp=47-48}} The ideal Stoic would instead measure things at their real value,{{sfn|Capes|1880|pp=47-48}} and see that the passions are not natural.{{sfn|Capes|1880|pp=47-48}} To be free of the passions is to have a happiness which is self-contained.{{sfn|Capes|1880|pp=47-48}} There would be nothing to fear—for unreason is the only evil; no cause for anger—for others cannot harm you.{{sfn|Capes|1880|pp=47-48}}

The Stoics arranged the passions under four headings: distress, pleasure, fear and lust.{{Harvnb|Sorabji|2000|p=29}} One report of the Stoic definitions of these passions appears in the treatise On Passions by Chrysippus (trans. Long & Sedley, pg. 411, modified):

• Distress (lupē): Distress is an irrational contraction, or a fresh opinion that something bad is present, at which people think it right to be depressed.
• Fear (phobos): Fear is an irrational aversion, or avoidance of an expected danger.
• Lust (epithumia): Lust is an irrational desire, or pursuit of an expected good but in reality bad.
• Delight (hēdonē): Delight is an irrational swelling, or a fresh opinion that something good is present, at which people think it right to be elated.

Two of these passions (distress and delight) refer to emotions currently present, and two of these (fear and lust) refer to emotions directed at the future. Thus there are just two states directed at the prospect of good and evil, but subdivided as to whether they are present or future:{{Harvnb|Graver|2007|p=54}} Numerous subdivisions of the same class were brought under the head of the separate passions:Cicero's Tusculan Disputations by J. E. King.

• Distress: Envy, Rivalry, Jealousy, Compassion, Anxiety, Mourning, Sadness, Troubling, Grief, Lamenting, Depression, Vexation, Despondency.
• Fear: Sluggishness, Shame, Fright, Timidity, Consternation, Pusillanimity, Bewilderment, and Faintheartedness.
• Lust: Anger, Rage, Hatred, Enmity, Wrath, Greed, and Longing.
• Delight: Malice, Rapture, and Ostentation.

The wise person (sophos) is someone who is free from the passions (apatheia). Instead the sage experiences good-feelings (eupatheia) which are clear-headed.{{Harvnb|Inwood|1999|p=705}} These emotional impulses are not excessive, but nor are they diminished emotions.{{Harvnb|Annas|1994|p=115}}{{Harvnb|Graver|2007|p=52}} Instead they are the correct rational emotions. The Stoics listed the good-feelings under the headings of joy (chara), wish (boulesis), and caution (eulabeia).{{sfn|Annas|1994|pp=114}} Thus if something is present which is a genuine good, then the wise person experiences an uplift in the soul—joy (chara).{{Harvnb|Inwood|1999|p=701}} The Stoics also subdivided the good-feelings:{{Harvnb|Graver|2007|p=58}}

• Joy: Enjoyment, Cheerfulness, Good spirits
• Wish: Good intent, Goodwill, Welcoming, Cherishing, Love
• Caution: Moral shame, Reverence

The Stoics accepted that suicide was permissible for the wise person in circumstances that might prevent them from living a virtuous life,{{Cite book

| last1 = Marietta

| first1 = Don E.

| title = Introduction to Ancient Philosophy

| year = 1998

| publisher = M.E. Sharpe

| location = Armonk, N.Y.

| isbn = 9780765602152

| oclc=37935252

|pages=153–154

}} such as if they fell victim to severe pain or disease, but otherwise suicide would usually be seen as a rejection of one's social duty.William Braxton Irvine, (2009), A guide to the good life: the ancient art of Stoic joy, p. 200. Oxford University Press For example, Plutarch reports that accepting life under tyranny would have compromised Cato's self-consistency (constantia) as a Stoic and impaired his freedom to make the honorable moral choices.{{Cite journal|title=Cato's suicide in Plutarch AV Zadorojnyi|journal=The Classical Quarterly |volume=57 |issue=1 |pages=216–230 |year=2007 |doi=10.1017/S0009838807000195 |last1=Zadorojnyi |first1=Alexei V. |s2cid=170834913}}

For around five hundred years Stoic logic was one of the two great systems of logic.{{Harvnb|Kneale|Kneale|1962|p=113}} The logic of Chrysippus was discussed alongside that of Aristotle, and it may well have been more prominent since Stoicism was the dominant philosophical school.{{Harvnb|Kneale|Kneale|1962|p=177}} From a modern perspective Aristotle's term logic and the Stoic logic of propositions appear complementary, but they were sometimes regarded as rival systems.

In late antiquity the Stoic school fell into decline, and the last pagan philosophical school, the Neoplatonists, adopted Aristotle's logic for their own.{{Harvnb|Sharples|2003|p=156}} Plotinus had criticized both Aristotle's Categories and those of the Stoics; his student Porphyry, however, defended Aristotle's scheme. He justified this by arguing that they be interpreted strictly as expressions, rather than as metaphysical realities. The approach can be justified, at least in part, by Aristotle's own words in The Categories. Boethius' acceptance of Porphyry's interpretation led to their being accepted by Scholastic philosophy.{{citation needed|date=January 2023}} As a result the Stoic writings on logic did not survive, and only elements of Stoic logic made their way into the logical writings Boethius and other later commentators , transmitting confused parts of Stoic logic to the Middle Ages. Propositional logic was redeveloped by Peter Abelard in the 12th-century, but by the mid-15th-century the only logic which was being studied was a simplified version of Aristotle's.{{Harvnb|Hurley|2011|p=6}} Knowledge about Stoic logic as a system was lost until the 20th century, when logicians familiar with the modern propositional calculus reappraised the ancient accounts of it.

The Fathers of the Church regarded Stoicism as a "pagan philosophy";Agathias. Histories, 2.31.{{cite encyclopedia |last=David |first=Sedley |editor=E. Craig |encyclopedia=Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy |title=Ancient philosophy |url=http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/A130 |access-date=2008-10-18 |archive-date=11 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141011170008/http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/A130 |url-status=live }} nonetheless, early Christian writers used some of the central philosophical concepts of Stoicism. Examples include the terms "logos", "virtue", "Spirit", and "conscience". Like Stoicism, Christianity asserts an inner freedom in the face of the external world, a belief in human kinship with Nature or God, a sense of the innate depravity—or "persistent evil"—of humankind, and the futility and temporary nature of worldly possessions and attachments. Both encourage Ascesis with respect to the passions and inferior emotions, such as lust, and envy, so that the higher possibilities of one's humanity can be awakened and developed. Stoic influence can also be seen in the works of Ambrose of Milan, Marcus Minucius Felix, and Tertullian.{{Cite web|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Stoicism|title=Stoicism | Definition, History, & Influence | Britannica|website=www.britannica.com|access-date=2 January 2022|archive-date=28 June 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230628193627/https://www.britannica.com/topic/Stoicism|url-status=live}}

{{main|Neostoicism}}

Neostoicism was a philosophical movement that arose in the late 16th century from the works of the Renaissance humanist Justus Lipsius, who sought to combine the beliefs of Stoicism and Christianity.{{cite IEP |url-id=neostoic |title=Neostoicism |last=Sellars |first=John}} The project of neostoicism has been described as an attempt by Lipsius to construct "a secular ethics based on Roman Stoic philosophy." He did not endorse religious toleration in an unqualified way: hence the importance of a morality not tied to religion.{{cite book |last1=Israel |first1=Jonathan Irvine |title=The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness and Fall, 1477–1806 |date=1998 |publisher=Clarendon Press |isbn=978-0-19-820734-4 |page=372 |language=en}} The work of Guillaume du Vair, Traité de la Constance (1594), was another important influence in the neo-stoic movement. Where Lipsius had mainly based his work on the writings of Seneca, du Vair emphasized Epictetus. Pierre Charron came to a neo-stoic position through the impact of the French Wars of Religion. He made a complete separation of morality and religion.{{cite book |last1=Schmitt |first1=C. B. |last2=Kraye |first2=Jill |last3=Kessler |first3=Eckhard |last4=Skinner |first4=Quentin |title=The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy |year=1990 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-39748-3 |page=374 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jJnyxg3xxTEC&pg=PA374 |language=en}}

In the 18th-century Immanuel Kant declared that "since Aristotle ... logic has not been able to advance a single step, and is thus to all appearance a closed and complete body of doctrine."{{Harvnb|O'Toole|Jennings|2004|p=403}} quoting Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. To 19th-century historians, who believed that Hellenistic philosophy represented a decline from that of Plato and Aristotle, Stoic logic was seen with contempt.{{Harvnb|O'Toole|Jennings|2004|p=403}} Carl Prantl thought that Stoic logic was "dullness, triviality, and scholastic quibbling" and he welcomed the fact that the works of Chrysippus were no longer extant.{{Harvnb|O'Toole|Jennings|2004|p=397}}

Although developments in modern logic that parallel Stoic logic began in the middle of the 19th-century with the work of George Boole and Augustus De Morgan, Stoic logic itself was only reappraised in the 20th-century, beginning with the work of Polish logician Jan Łukasiewicz and Benson Mates. According to Susanne Bobzien, "The many close similarities between Chrysippus' philosophical logic and that of Gottlob Frege are especially striking".{{sfn|Bobzien|2020}}

{{blockquote|What we see as a result is a close similarity between [these] methods of reasoning and the behaviour of digital computers. ... The code happens to come from the nineteenth-century logician and mathematician George Boole, whose aim was to codify the relations studied much earlier by Chrysippus (albeit with greater abstraction and sophistication). Later generations built on Boole's insights ... but the logic that made it all possible was the interconnected logic of an interconnected universe, discovered by the ancient Chrysippus, who labored long ago under an old Athenian stoa.{{Harvnb|Shenefelt|White|2013|pp=96–97}}}}

{{anchor|Modern}}

Contemporary usage defines a stoic as a "person who represses feelings or endures patiently".{{cite web |url=http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=stoic |work=etymonline.com, Online Etymology Dictionary |title=Stoic |access-date=2006-09-02 |last=Harper |first=Douglas |date=November 2001 |archive-date=19 November 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161119033326/http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=stoic |url-status=live }} The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy{{'}}s entry on Stoicism notes: "the sense of the English adjective 'stoical' is not utterly misleading with regard to its philosophical origins".{{sfn|Baltzly}}

Contemporary Stoicism draws from the late 20th- and early 21st-century spike in publications of scholarly works on ancient Stoicism. The revival of Stoicism in the 20th century can be traced to the publication of Problems in Stoicism by A. A. Long in 1971.{{sfn|Long|1971}}

According to philosopher Pierre Hadot, philosophy for a Stoic is not just a set of beliefs or ethical claims; it is a way of life involving constant practice and training (or "askēsis"), an active process of constant practice and self-reminder. Epictetus, in his Discourses, distinguished between three types of act: judgment, desire, and inclination.{{sfn|Hadot|1995|pp=9-10}} which Hadot identifies these three acts with logic, physics and ethics respectively.{{sfn|Hadot|1998|pp=106-115}} Hadot writes that in the Meditations, "Each maxim develops either one of these very characteristic topoi [i.e., acts], or two of them or three of them."Hadot, P. (1987) Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Paris, 2nd ed., p. 135.

Stoic philosophy was the original philosophical inspiration for modern cognitive psychotherapy, particularly as mediated by Albert Ellis' rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT),{{Cite web|url=http://www.rebtnetwork.org/|title=REBT Network: Albert Ellis | Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy|website=www.rebtnetwork.org|access-date=13 January 2023|archive-date=14 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201114001008/http://rebtnetwork.org/|url-status=live}} the major precursor of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) The original cognitive therapy treatment manual for depression by Aaron T. Beck et al. states, "The philosophical origins of cognitive therapy can be traced back to the Stoic philosophers".Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery (1979) Cognitive Therapy of Depression, p. 8. A well-known quotation from Enchiridion of Epictetus was taught to most clients during the initial session of traditional REBT by Ellis and his followers: "It's not the events that upset us, but our judgments about the events."{{sfn|Robertson|2010}}

• 4 Maccabees
• Amor fati
• A Man in Full

{{Refbegin}}

a. {{Note label|A|a|none}} The minimum requirement for a conditional is that the consequent follows from the antecedent. The pseudo-conditional adds that the antecedent must also be true. The causal assertible adds an asymmetry rule such that if p is the cause/reason for q, then q cannot be the cause/reason for p. {{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=109}}

b. {{Note label|B|b|none}} "Stoic modal logic is not a logic of modal propositions (e.g., propositions of the type 'It is possible that it is day' ...) ... instead, their modal theory was about non-modalized propositions like 'It is day', insofar as they are possible, necessary, and so forth." {{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|p=117}}

c. {{Note label|C|c|none}} Most of these argument forms had already been discussed by Theophrastus, but: "It is plain that even if Theophrastus discussed (1)–(5), he did not anticipate Chrysippus' achievement. ... his Aristotelian approach to the study and organization of argument-forms would have given his discussion of mixed hypothetical syllogisms an utterly unStoical aspect." {{Harvnb|Barnes|1999|p=83}}

d. {{Note label|D|d|none}} These Latin names date from the Middle Ages. {{Harvnb|Shenefelt|White|2013|p=288}}

e. {{Note label|E|e|none}} For a brief summary of these themata see Susanne Bobzien's [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ancient/#StoSyl/ Ancient Logic] article for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. For a detailed (and technical) analysis of the themata, including a tentative reconstruction of the two lost ones, see {{Harvnb|Bobzien|1999|pp=137–148}}, {{Harvnb|Long |Sedley|1987|}}, §36 HIJ.

{{Refend}}

{{reflist|30em}}

Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta is a collection by Hans von Arnim of fragments and testimonia of the earlier Stoics, published in 1903–1905 as part of the Bibliotheca Teubneriana. It includes the fragments and testimonia of Zeno of Citium, Chrysippus and their immediate followers. At first the work consisted of three volumes, to which Maximilian Adler in 1924 added a fourth, containing general indices. Teubner reprinted the whole work in 1964.

• [https://archive.org/details/stoicorumveterum01arniuoft Volume 1] – Fragments of Zeno and his followers
• [https://archive.org/details/stoicorumveterum02arniuoft Volume 2] – Logical and physical fragments of Chrysippus
• [https://archive.org/details/stoicorumveterum03arniuoft Volume 3] – Ethical fragments of Chrysippus and some fragments of his pupils
• [https://archive.org/details/stoicorumveterum04arniuoft Volume 4] – Indices of words, proper names and sources

• {{Citation|author-last=Adamson|author-first=Peter|title=Philosophy in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds|

year=2015|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-872802-3}}

• {{Cite book|last=Annas|first=Julia|title=Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind|year=1994|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=978-0520076594}}
• {{Citation|last=Barnes|first=Johnathan|year=1997|title=Logic and the Imperial Stoa|publisher=Brill|isbn=90-04-10828-9}}
• {{Citation|last=Barnes|first=Johnathan|contribution=Logic: The Peripatetics|title=The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy|editor1-first=Keimpe|editor1-last=Algra|year=1999|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0-521-25028-5}}
• Becker, Lawrence C., A New Stoicism (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1998) {{ISBN|0691016607}}
• {{Citation|last=Bobzien|first=Susanne|contribution=Logic|title=The Oxford Classical Dictionary|year=1996a|editor1-first=Simon|editor1-last=Hornblower|editor2-first=Antony|editor2-last=Spawforth|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-1986-6172-6|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780198661726}}
• {{Citation|last=Bobzien|first=Susanne|contribution=Stoic Syllogistic|title=Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14|year=1996b|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-1982-3670-2}}
• {{Citation|last=Bobzien|first=Susanne|contribution=Logic: The Stoics|title=The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy|editor1-first=Keimpe|editor1-last=Algra|year=1999|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0-521-25028-5}}
• {{cite SEP|url-id=logic-ancient|title=Ancient Logic|last=Bobzien|first=Susanne|date=2020}}
• Brooke, Christopher. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau (Princeton UP, 2012) [http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9737.html excerpts] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140429075707/http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9737.html |date=29 April 2014 }}
• {{Cite book|last=Capes|first=William Wolfe|title=Stoicism|year=1880|publisher=Pott, Young, & Co.|oclc=1240350}}
• {{Cite book|last=Graver|first=Margaret|title=Stoicism and Emotion|year=2007|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=978-0226305578}}
• {{cite book |last1=Hadot |first1=Pierre |title=Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault |date=3 August 1995 |publisher=Wiley |isbn=978-0-631-18033-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RNDmvMrpr4YC |access-date=21 May 2025 |language=en}}
• {{cite book |last1=Hadot |first1=Pierre |title=The Inner Citadel: The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius |date=1998 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-46171-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3dLVyyDE-vQC |access-date=21 May 2025 |language=en}}
• {{Citation|author-last=Hadot|author-first=Pierre|title=What is Ancient Philosophy?|year=2002|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=0-674-00733-6|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/whatisancientphi0000hado}}
• {{Citation|author-last=Hurley|author-first=Patrick J.|title=A Concise Introduction to Logic|year=2011|publisher=Wadsworth|isbn=978-0-8400-3417-5}}
• {{Citation|last=Ierodiakonou|first=Katerina|contribution=Stoicism|title=Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece|year=2006|editor1-first=Nigel|editor1-last=Wilson|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn= 978-0-4158-7396-3}}
• {{Citation|last=Ierodiakonou|first=Katerina| contribution=Stoic Logic| title=A Companion to Ancient Philosophy| year=2009|editor1-last=Gill|editor1-first=Mary Louise|editor2-last=Pellegrin|editor2-first=Pierre|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|isbn=978-1-4051-8834-0}}
• {{Citation|last=Inwood|first=Brad|contribution=Stoic Ethics|editor1-last=Algra|editor1-first=Keimpe|editor2-last=Barnes|editor2-first=Johnathan|editor3-last=Mansfield|editor3-first=Jaap|editor4-last=Schofield|editor4-first=Malcolm|title=The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy|year=1999|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0521250283}}
• {{Citation|author-last=Inwood|author-first=Brad|contribution=Stoicism|title=Routledge History of Philosophy Volume II: Aristotle to Augustine|year=2003|editor-last=Furley|editor-first=David|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-4153-0874-8}}
• {{Citation|author1-last=Kneale|author1-first=William|author2-last=Kneale|author2-first=Martha|title=The Development of Logic|year=1962|publisher=Clarendon Press}}
• {{Cite book |last=Karamanolis |first=George E. |year=2013 |chapter=Free will and divine providence |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZVdsBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA151 |title=The Philosophy of Early Christianity |location=New York and London |publisher=Routledge |edition=1st |series=Ancient Philosophies |pages=151 |isbn=9781844655670}}
• {{Cite book|last=Long|first=A A|title=Problems in Stoicism|publisher=Athlone Press|year=1971|isbn=0485111187|location=London|language=English|url=https://philpapers.org/rec/LONPIS|url-status=live|access-date=13 January 2023|archive-date=28 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230328220147/https://philpapers.org/rec/LONPIS}}
• {{cite book|editor1-first=A. A. |editor1-last=Long |editor2-first=D. N. |editor2-last=Sedley |title=The Hellenistic Philosophers |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1987}}
• {{Citation|author-last=Long|author-first=A. A.|chapter=Dialectic and the Stoic Sage|title=Stoic Studies|year=2001|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=0-520-22974-6}}
• {{Citation |last=Mates |first=Benson |author-link=Benson Mates |year=1953 |title=Stoic Logic|url=https://archive.org/details/stoiclogic |publisher=University of California Press}}
• {{Citation|author-last=Nussbaum|author-first=Martha C.|title=The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics|year=2009|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-14131-2}}
• {{Citation|author1-last=O'Toole|author1-first=Robert R.|author2-last=Jennings|author2-first=Raymond E.|contribution=The Megarians and the Stoics|title=Handbook of the History of Logic|volume=1|year=2004|editor1-first=Dov M.|editor1-last=Gabbay|editor2-first=John|editor2-last=Woods|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=0-444-51596-8}}
• {{Cite book| author-last1=Robertson |author-first1=Donald | title=The Philosophy of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy: Stoicism as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy| year=2010| publisher=Karnac| location=London| isbn=978-1855757561| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XsOFyJaR5vEC| access-date=27 January 2016| archive-date=8 July 2023| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230708083227/https://books.google.com/books?id=XsOFyJaR5vEC| url-status=live}}
• {{Citation|last=Sellars|first=John|year=2006|title=Ancient Philosophies: Stoicism|publisher=Acumen|isbn=978-1-84465-053-8}}
• {{Citation|author1-last=Shenefelt|author1-first=Michael|author2-last=White|author2-first=Heidi|title=If A, Then B: How Logic Shaped the World|year=2013|publisher=Columbia University Press|isbn=978-0-231-53519-9}}
• {{Citation|author-last=Sharples|author-first=Robert W.|contribution=The Peripatetic School|title=Routledge History of Philosophy Volume II: Aristotle to Augustine|year=2003|editor-last=Furley|editor-first=David|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-4153-0874-8}}
• {{Citation|last=Sorabji|first=Richard|title=Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation|year=2000|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0198250050|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/emotionpeaceofmi0000sora}}
• {{Citation|last=White|first=Michael J.|year=2003|contribution=Stoic Natural Philosophy (Physics and Cosmology)|title=The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics|editor-last=Inwood|editor-first=Brad|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0521779855}}

• {{Citation|title=The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy|editor1-first=Keimpe|editor1-last=Algra|year=1999|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0-521-25028-5}}
• {{cite book |editor-last1=Armstrong |editor-first1=A.H. |title=Classical Mediterranean spirituality : Egyptian, Greek, Roman |date=1986 |publisher=New York : Crossroad |isbn=978-0-8245-0764-0 |url=https://archive.org/details/classicalmediter0000unse |access-date=21 May 2025}}
• {{cite book |last1=Bobzien |first1=Susanne |title=Determinism and freedom in Stoic philosophy |date=1998 |publisher=Clarendon |location=Oxford |isbn=9780191597091 |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/27236 |access-date=21 May 2025}}
• {{cite book |editor-last1=Boudouris |editor-first1=K.J. |title=Hellenistic philosophy |date=1993–1994 |publisher=Internat. Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture and K.B |location=Athens |isbn=9789607670014}}
• {{cite book |last1=Bulloch |first1=Anthony W. |title=Images and ideologies: self-definition in the Hellenistic world |date=1993 |publisher=Univ. of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=9780520075269 |url=http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft4r29p0kg |access-date=21 May 2025}}
• {{cite book |last1=Colish |first1=Marcia L. |title=The Stoic tradition from antiquity to the early Middle Ages |date=1990 |publisher=E.J. Brill |location=Leiden ; New York |isbn=9789004093300}}
• {{cite book |editor1=Miriam Griffin |editor2=Jonathan Barnes|title=Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society |date=1997 |publisher=Clarendon Press |location=Oxford |isbn=9780198150855}}
• {{Cite book|year=1999|title=Topics in Stoic Philosophy|editor-last=Ierodiakonou|editor-first=Katerina|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=0198237685}}
• {{Citation|title=The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics|editor-last=Inwood|editor-first=Brad|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0521779855}}
• {{cite book |editor-last1=Irwin| editor-first1=Terence|title=Classical philosophy : collected papers |date=1995 |publisher=New York : Garland |isbn=978-0-8153-1829-3 |url=https://archive.org/details/classicalphiloso0008unse |access-date=21 May 2025}}
• {{cite book |last1=Long |first1=A. A. |title=Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics |date=1986 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-0-7156-1238-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5HFFSAAACAAJ |access-date=21 May 2025 |language=en}}
• {{Citation|last=Long|first=A. A.|year=1996|title=Stoic Studies|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=0520229746}}
• Long, A. A. 2006. From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• {{cite book |last1=Meijer |first1=P. A. |title=Stoic Theology: Proofs for the Existence of the Cosmic God and of the Traditional Gods : Including a Commentary on Cleanthes' Hymn on Zeus |date=2007 |publisher=Eburon Uitgeverij B.V. |isbn=978-90-5972-202-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9lFlb4dn51sC |access-date=21 May 2025 |language=en}}
• {{cite book |editor-last1=Osler |editor-first1=Margaret J. |title=Atoms, pneuma, and tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic themes in European thought |date=1991 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-40048-0}}
• {{cite book|editor-first=John M. |editor-last=Rist|editor-link=John Rist|title=The Stoics|publisher=University of California Press |year=1978|isbn=0-520-03135-0}}
• {{cite book |editor-last1=Salles |editor-first1=Ricardo |title=Metaphysics, soul, and ethics in ancient thought: themes from the work of Richard Sorabji |date=2005 |publisher=Clarendon Press |location=Oxford |isbn=9780199261307}}
• {{Cite book|year=2009|title=God and Cosmos in Stoicism|editor-last=Salles|editor-first=Ricardo|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=9780199556144}}
• {{cite book |last1=Schofield |first1=Malcolm |title=The Stoic idea of the city |date=1999 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |isbn=9780226740065 |edition=Repr}}
• {{cite book |editor-last1=Schofield |editor-first1=Malcolm |editor-last2=Striker |editor-first2=Gisela |title=The norms of nature: studies in Hellenistic ethics |date=1986 |publisher=Cambridge Univ. Pr. [u.a.] |location=Cambridge |isbn=9782735101474}}
• {{cite book |last1=Sellars |first1=John |title=The Art of Living: The Stoics on the Nature and Function of Philosophy |date=18 January 2018 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-351-77274-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aLpHDwAAQBAJ |access-date=21 May 2025 |language=en}}
• {{cite book |last1=Sharples |first1=R. W. |title=Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy |date=7 August 2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-83640-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CwuIAgAAQBAJ |access-date=21 May 2025 |language=en}}
• {{cite book |editor-last1=Sihvola |editor-first1=J. |editor-last2=Engberg-Pedersen |editor-first2=T. |title=The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy |date=9 March 2013 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-94-015-9082-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OKNfBgAAQBAJ |access-date=21 May 2025 |language=en}}
• {{cite book |editor-last1=Sorabji |editor-first1=Richard |title=Aristotle and After |date=1997 |publisher=Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London |isbn=978-0-900587-79-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P7p4AAAAIAAJ |access-date=21 May 2025 |language=en}}
• {{cite book |editor-last1=Strange |editor-first1=Steven K. |editor-last2=Zupko |editor-first2=Jack |title=Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations |date=31 December 2010 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-18164-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yG0UYgEACAAJ |access-date=21 May 2025 |language=en}}
• {{cite book |last1=Striker |first1=Gisela |title=Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics |date=13 June 1996 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-47641-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jFtsu574PFQC |access-date=21 May 2025 |language=en}}

{{subject bar|auto=y|d=y|portal=Philosophy}}

{{Library resources box |by=no |onlinebooks=yes |others=yes |about=yes |label=Stoicism

|viaf= |lccn= |lcheading= |wikititle= }}

• {{cite SEP |url-id=stoicism |title=Stoicism |last=Baltzly |first=Dirk}}
• {{cite IEP |url-id=s/stoicism.htm |title=Stoicism}}
• {{cite IEP |url-id=s/stoiceth.htm |title= Stoic Ethics}}
• {{cite IEP |url-id=s/stoicmind.htm |title= Stoic Philosophy of Mind}}
• {{Cite EB1911|wstitle=Stoics |author-link=Robert Drew Hicks |first=Robert Drew |last=Hicks |short=x}}
• [https://www.britannica.com/topic/Stoicism Stoicism] at Encyclopedia Britannica

• [https://modernstoicism.com/modern-stoicism-the-organization-and-what-it-does/ Modern Stoicism Organization]
• [https://sites.google.com/view/csas-rhul Centre for the Study and Application of Stoicism]
• [https://newstoicism.org/ Stoa Nova]
• [https://aureliusfoundation.com/ Aurelius Foundation]

{{Stoicism}}

{{Greek schools of philosophy}}

{{Philosophy topics}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:Ancient Greece

Category:Ancient Rome

Category:Schools and traditions in hellenistic philosophy