Talk:1971 San Fernando earthquake/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 15:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
:{{u|Some Dude From North Carolina}}, Thanks for that. Take your time. Dawnseeker2000 19:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
=Infobox and lead=
- Couldn't find any issues with the infobox.
- I don't think the word "extraordinary" is neutral to use, so try replacing it. {{done}} I've replaced extraordinary with unprecedented. Maybe that will sound more in line with neutral wording.
- Other than that, the lead looks good.
=Tectonic setting=
- Remove the comma after "Channel Islands offshore". {{done}}
=Earthquake=
- Add a serial comma after "east–west strike". {{done}}
- I don't think "landsliding" is an actual word, so reword. {{done}}
- Add a comma after "the Tujunga segment". {{done}}
- "frequently-encountered" {{right arrow}} "frequently encountered" {{done}}
=Damage=
- "heart attack" {{right arrow}} "heart attacks" {{done}}
- Is "proper ties" the correct words being used, or is it a typo? {{done}} Yes, it's correct. I've linked Tie (engineering) to assist the reader.
- "The large" {{right arrow}} "A large" {{done}}
- Remove the comma after "closest school to Pacoima dam". {{done}}
=Aftermath=
- Add a comma after "Long Beach earthquake". {{done}}
- "debate began" {{right arrow}} "a debate began" {{done}}
=References=
- Sources are archived and well-cited. {{smiley}}
=Progress=
class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; width:50em" |
height=50|GA review {{small|(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)}} |
---|
#It is reasonably well written.
|
style="text-align:center;" |
Overall: Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|Pass}} |
height=30|15px · 15px · 15px · 15px |