Talk:2012 Summer Paralympics/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:2012 Summer Paralympics/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:2012 Summer Paralympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 21:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article. On the face of it, it will need some work in order to pass. Please allow a day or two for me to post comments. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?
2. :A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: {{GAList/check|y}}
3. ::
4. :B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: {{GAList/check|y}}
5. ::
6. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
7. :A. Has an appropriate reference section: {{GAList/check|y}}
8. ::
9. :B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}}
10. :: See below
11. :C. No original research: {{GAList/check|y}}
12. ::
13. Is it broad in its coverage?
14. :A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|y}}
15. :: See below
16. :B. Focused: {{GAList/check|y}}
17. ::
18. Is it neutral?
19. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
20. ::
21. Is it stable?
22. : No edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|y}}
23. ::
24. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
25. :A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: {{GAList/check|y}}
26. ::
27. :B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: {{GAList/check|y}}
28. ::
29. Overall:
30. :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|pass}}
31. ::

; Controversies

• A little embarrassed that a controversy that we started gets so much. You should also add the one about the medal that was taken away after the handicap was re-calculated.

::{{done}}, assuming you mean Mariia Pomazan - Eron^Talk 19:02, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

; References

• FN 1 has a raw URL
• FN 2 is broken
• FN 11 is broken
• FN 19 is broken
• FN 21 is broken
• FN 52 has a raw URL (Site also appears to be virus infected)
• FN 57 publisher? access date?
• FN 58 publisher? access date?
• FN 65 has a raw URL
• FN 66 is broken
• FN 92 is broken
• FN 93 is broken

::{{done}}All the above references have been reviewed and fixed - Eron^Talk 20:49, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

; External links

• First one is broken

::{{done}} - Eron^Talk 18:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

( A few fixes is all we need. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:57, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

• Three {{tl|citation needed}} tags that need fixing, and we'll be good. Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

::{{done}} - Eron^Talk 19:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

• Passing article. Well done. I note in passing that Sir Phillip Craven's comments about media coverage (in the controversies section) were in response to questions at a press conference from Wikipedia reporters. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)