Talk:A-flat clarinet/GA1
GA Review
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. Schminnte [talk to me] 00:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: Schminnte (talk · contribs) 08:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Jonathanischoice, you know the drill by now so I'll skip the boring bits. I'll start working on this review soon, at least within the week. As a clarinettist, I'm excited to get started and spotcheck with my own copies! All the best, Schminnte [talk to me] 08:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
:@Jonathanischoice, I think I have finished with review comments. I will now place the article on the standard hold period to give you time to address them. All the best, Schminnte [talk to me] 21:26, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
:: {{ping|Schminnte}} - Hi, I'm half-way through, but it's now Christmas in my part of the world (Merry Christmas!) so I might not be able to get to this for another few days. Cheers, Jon (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
:::@Jonathanischoice: Still a few hours here! I'm more than happy to extend the hold for a while, say until New Year's Day? Would that work for you? Schminnte [talk to me] 22:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
::::That would be good - I've just got back to it today. Cheers — Jon (talk) 10:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Schminnte}} nearly but not quite finished, can you let me know what you think so far? Cheers — Jon (talk) 00:19, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
:::::@Jonathanischoice, great progress. Just a few more points. Schminnte [talk to me] 02:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
:::: {{ping|Schminnte}} side note... I'm trying to get hold of [https://tewaharoa.victoria.ac.nz/permalink/64VUW_INST/1m9iv9v/cdi_askewsholts_vlebooks_9780810886483 this resource] (Dictionary for the Modern Clarinetist) which could be a good RS for remaining points, but I might not get to it in time; apparently the full text is available through ProQuest but my library doesn't get to it, and I won't be able to interloan the physical book until after 8 January. Are you able to get it? — Jon (talk) 08:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
:::::It appears to be available on [https://archive.org/details/dictionaryformod0000ells/mode/1up archive.org] with a free membership. Can you get it through that? Schminnte [talk to me] 09:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|Schminnte}} happy new year :) thanks for finding that, I didn't think to look on IA. I've attempted to address the remaining points, where possible, and marked them with a yellow (!) icon for convenience. Zero luck with images or sound samples so far, alas. Jon (talk) 20:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
:::::::Happy new year Jon. Seeing as all other points are resolved and User:Mscuthbert has been inactive for two weeks, I'm going to pass this review. Other discussions about new images and sounds can be discussed on the talk page: for now I am aware that the review has been open for two weeks and content that locating the best quality media has been attempted. Congratulations on another GA! All the best, Schminnte [talk to me] 00:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
= Comments =
:GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- :a (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y}} b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: §Lede:
- :::
Turn the two links to clarinet and clarinet family into a single link to clarinet family over both words - S - :::: Done — Jon (talk)
- :::
{{tq|common B♭ clarinet, and pitched a minor seventh higher}}: remove comma since we are still discussing the Bb - S - :::: Done — Jon (talk)
- :::
{{tq|Around the beginning of the 19th century several}}: comma needed after century for clarity - S - :::: Done — Jon (talk)
- :::
More generally I would like to see the lede expanded to include more points from §Construction and §Repertoire - S - :::: Have had an initial go, thoughts? — Jon (talk)
- ::::: Good start, maybe mention some of the makers and more famous composers (Verdi, Bartók)? - S
- ::: Including infobox things here:
- ::::
Arguably "Wind Woodwind" is not necessary since woodwind is linked above. I think you can remove these but keep "single-reed" - S - ::::: have indicated a classification heirarchy, but this is not done on other instrument pages, so maybe you're right? — Jon (talk)
- :::::: I think the arrows work quite well as a compromise, not entirely sure on the MOS for this - S
- ::::
Clarinet might not be needed to be linked in "related instruments" since clarinet family is linked below. If it is kept, I would like a link to Bb clarinet or Bb clarinet specifically - S - ::::: Done (fixed other things here too) — Jon (talk)
- :: §History:
- :::
Could we have links to the musicologists mentioned in the first sentence? - S - :::: Done — Jon (talk)
- :::
"Small" should be in italics, not quotes per MOS:WAW - S - :::: Done — Jon (talk)
- :::
{{tq|Of the three highest and smallest "octave" clarinets [...] only 28 centimetres (11 in) long}}: I think a split is called for after "bands" - S - :::: Done — Jon (talk)
- ::::: Much better, thanks - S
- :: §Construction:
- :::
Wiki-link mouthpiece and bell - S - :::: Done — Jon (talk)
- :::
{{tq|larger clarinets, or even}}: this last comma seems a bit too much separation - S - :::: Have reworded sentence for hopefully better clarity. — Jon (talk)
- :: §Repertoire:
- :::
Do we need to know that go featured other tangentially related instruments? - S - :::: Maybe not, but it's kind of fun... Vérifications also has piccolo, musette and Casio SK-1 — Jon (talk)
- ::::: I think it's fine on reflection - S
- :::
I think the contemporary works list is unnecessary since its already in prose form - S - :::: Me too, fixed, moved Vérifications into prose — Jon (talk)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- :a (reference section): {{GAList/check|y}} b (inline citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}} d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: No copyvio found in internet sources with Earwig's - S
- :: Source spot checks for copyvio and text-source integrity (copyvio only checked when mentioned):
- ::: Ref 2 (Shackleton 2001): pass for verifiability.
Maybe consider mentioning that Shackleton also calls these octave clarinets- S - ::::
He clarifies later thatTschaikov (p43) clarifies that "octave" clarinets refer to the three highest in A B♭ and C, an octave above the more common regular-sized (soprano) clarinets in those keys. - ::: Ref 3 (Lawson 1995): pass for verifiability - S
- ::: Ref 4 (Baines 1977): pass for verifiability - S
- ::: Ref 5a&b (Rice 2017): both passes for verifiability - S
- ::: Ref 6 (Tschaikov 1995): pass for verifiability,
perhaps also mention he calls them "little" at some points- S - :::: Done — Jon (talk)
- ::: Ref 9 (Rice 2017): pass for verifiability and copyvio - S
- ::: Ref 10 (Forsyth 1914): pass for verifiability - S
- ::: Ref 11 (Tschaikov 1995): pass for verifiability and copyvio,
though is there any reason not to use the given spelling of picksüsses Hölzl (or picksüßes Hölzl as is given in other sources)?- S - :::: Fixed, as in the cited ref — Jon (talk)
- ::: Ref 14a&b (Baines 1977):
a is a fail for verifiability but a pass for copyvio, page doesn't mention any time-frames or countries with regards to military bands. b is also a fail for verifiability for aforementioned reasons and as it doesn't mention doubling the piccolo flute line, only being able to play into piccolo range - S - :::: That's because for 14a I was using the wrong ref (now 11b, Tschaikov 1995 p.53), and for now I can't remember where I read that it largely copies the piccolo line in band parts, but I will find it and update the other ref (for now, ref 15) — Jon (talk)
- :::: I've given up on the piccolo factoid; I can't recall where I read it at the time, and now can't find it. — Jon (talk)
- ::: Ref 16 (Tschaikov 1995): pass for verifiability and copyvio - S
- ::: Ref 18 (Tschaikov 1995): pass for verifiability and copyvio - S
- ::
Can we have author-links for Nicholas Shackleton, Colin Lawson, Cecil Forsyth and Anthony Baines? - S - ::: Done — Jon (talk)
- ::
"Hans-Joachim Hespos website", "website" is not needed - S - ::: Done — Jon (talk)
- ::
What makes The Clarinet BBoard a reliable source? - S - ::: It really isn't, but I have been hoping to find this in a more reliable place, without luck so far. Can always remove/revise the claim I suppose. — Jon (talk)
- :::: Unless a better source can be found, I think the statement should be removed - S
- ::::: Rephrased, cites a Leblanc museum specimen built 1983 — Jon (talk)
- ::
YouTube and Discogs are unreliable and shouldn't be used to support that text - S - ::: Moved to §External links — Jon (talk)
- ::
The first paragraph of §Construction and the last of §Repertoire need citations - S - ::: Reworked the last repertoire paragraph, found a choir history article and Cailliet Grove entry. There's literally nothing written about the construction of A♭ clarinets, but at least the one-piece body segment is self-evident from photos in manufacturer catalogs/websites, and I'm thinking it's bordering on WP:SKYBLUE? Have used a web-ref to an example museum item which states the obvious.
- ::
When the publisher is Cambridge University Press, the location isn't needed - S - ::: Fixed — Jon (talk)
- It is broad in its coverage.
- :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: Although short, the article holds up when compared to other literature (Cambridge Companion, Grove, etc.) - S
- :: I was hesitant on the inclusion of other piccolo here, but on reflection I think this is fine. It makes sense to address them as well in this article - S
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: Not sure how you could be biased towards a clarinet, but the articles seems neutral. Bias is not present when discussing makers - S
- It is stable.
- :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: Just a question here, is the content dispute detailed at talk page section "Military bands and composers in Italy" completely over? A simple yes/no is fine - S
- ::: I'm not certain; it's entirely possible I'm misunderstanding something, and I'd be interested what Mscuthbert thinks about things. — Jon (talk)
- :::: Seeing as the user is inactive and it was quite a while ago, I'm AGFing this criterion and passing it - S
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- :a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: Images tagged properly with CC licenses - S
- :: Is there any way to get a non-free sound file here, or an external link to an appropriate site? - S
- ::: {{ping|Mscuthbert}} would you be interested in recording something for the article? Otherwise I haven't been able to find anything on Commons or elsewhere that is compatibly-licensed (public domain, CC, etc.) — Jon (talk)
- :: Can a better picture of reeds be found than :File:B-flat e-flat a-flat reeds.jpg, which looks quite low quality? - S
- ::: {{ping|Mscuthbert}} I don't think it's that bad, but could you take another photo of your reeds? I'm assuming Schminnte means the reflection/glare. — Jon (talk)
- ::
Per MOS:CAPLENGTH, a caption is not needed for this infobox photo - S - ::: Done — Jon (talk)
- ::
Caption 3: {{tq|Note the greater difference in size between A♭ and E♭ than between E♭ and B♭}}: why should we note this? It isn't mentioned in text and seems unnecessary to say. - S - ::: Fair enough. — Jon (talk)
- Overall:
- :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
- ::
{{abot}}