Talk:Aluminium/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Aluminium/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Aluminium/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kepler-1229b (talk · contribs) 18:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

class="wikitable" style="text-align:left"

style="vertical-align:top;" ! width="30" | Rate ! width="300"| Attribute ! | Review Comment

style="vertical-align:top;" | colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: {{GATable/item|1a|?|A rather technical topic. }} {{GATable/item|1b|y| }}

style="vertical-align:top;" | colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}: {{GATable/item|2a|y| }} {{GATable/item|2b|y|No issues noted. }} {{GATable/item|2c|y|Sourced. }} {{GATable/item|2d|y|No apparent plagiarism or copyright violations. }}

style="vertical-align:top;" | colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: {{GATable/item|3a|y| }} {{GATable/item|3b|y| }} {{GATable/item|4|y|No issues noted. }} {{GATable/item|5|y|Stable. }}

style="vertical-align:top;" | colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: {{GATable/item|6a|y|Fine. }} {{GATable/item|6b|y| }} {{GATable/item|7|y|Pass? }}

{{ping|Kepler-1229b}} Do you have any specific concerns re 1a? Double sharp (talk) 13:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

:{{ping|Kepler-1229b}} Double sharp (talk) 13:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

::No. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 21:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

• An observation, the first five (5) sentences of the lead all start "Aluminium..." - that should be tweaked if possible....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
• {{ping|Casliber}} Tweaked it. Double sharp (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

So pass? Keresluna (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

:{{ping|Kepler-1229b}}Keresluna (talk) 22:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

::Pass, it has been two months. I see no reason to oppose that change. Keresluna (talk) 17:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC)