Talk:Anini/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: – Quadell (talk) 13:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Nominator: User:KRajaratnam1
| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" |
| valign="top"
! width="30" | Rate ! width="300"| Attribute ! | Review Comment |
| valign="top"
| | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: | {{GATable/item|1a |
| The article has frequent prose problems. There are sentence fragments and awkward phrasing throughout. I would recommend getting someone at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors to copyedit the article for smoother reading.
}} {{GATable/item|1b |
| According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lead section), the lede should summarize all important aspects of the article. This lede is insufficient. There are other problems as well. There are lists that should be incorporated into prose. Words are bolded which should not be. Nearly every section is a single paragraph, indicating that either more information should be added or the organization should be made more general.
}} |
| valign="top"
| | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}: | {{GATable/item|2a |
| References are not consistently formatted. (Some have ISBNs and some do not, some have page numbers and some do not, etc.) Also, references such as "Google Maps", "Google Earth", and "Maps of India" are not sufficient.
}} {{GATable/item|2b |
| Many sections have sourcing which is fine. But there are several important unsourced statements in History, Earthquakes, Demographics, and others. The Airports section gives an unsourced opinion. The Protests of neglect section has direct quotes that are unsourced.
}} {{GATable/item|2c|und| Many of the unsourced statements could be original research, or could not be. I can't tell with the current sourcing. }} |
| valign="top"
| | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: | {{GATable/item|3a |
| The are many sections where more information is needed. I think that Geography and Demographics are fine, even though they are short. But the History section really needs more information. Other sections could certainly use more information, if the sources provide it.
}} {{GATable/item|3b|+| Not a problem. }} {{GATable/item|4|+| Not a problem. }} {{GATable/item|5|+| Not a problem. }} |
| valign="top"
| | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: | {{GATable/item|6a|und| Were you the photographer for :File:Anini.jpg? The image description says "No rights reserved", but it also says that the image is released under a limited license that reserves some rights. Which is correct? More importantly, were you actually the photographer for :File:41 - Rajesh Tacho MLA (41 - Anini).jpg? }} {{GATable/item|6b|+| As a minor issue, captions should not end in a period unless they are complete sentences. But besides that nitpick, the captions are all suitable and the choice and placement are good. }} {{GATable/item|7 |
| Does not pass GA requirements at this time. Feel free to improve the article based on these suggestions and renominate, though it would probably be a good idea to submit the article to Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors first. – Quadell (talk) 14:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
}} |
