Login
Login

Talk:Apollo 16/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Apollo 16/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Apollo 16/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grondemar (talk · contribs) 01:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

This is an excellent article, very close to GA status. I have just a couple of minor concerns that need to be addressed before I pass the review:

  • Apolune and Perilune: According to Apsis, the forms Apocynthion and Pericynthion were preferred during the Apollo program. Perhaps we should use those instead?

::{{done}}

  • In the Lunar Surface section, a direct quote from geologist Don Wilhelms needs an immediate citation.

::{{done}}

:GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|y}} b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y}}
  3. ::
  4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  5. :a (references): {{GAList/check|y}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|hold}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}}
  6. ::
  7. It is broad in its coverage.
  8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
  9. ::
  10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
  12. ::
  13. It is stable.
  14. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
  15. ::
  16. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  17. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
  18. ::
  19. Overall:
  20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|hold}}
  21. :: This review is being placed {{icon|GAH}} on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.

Thanks. –Grondemar 06:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

:I've addressed both of your concerns. Thanks very much for your review. Tyrol5 [Talk] 14:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

::Thanks for addressing my concerns; I can now {{icon|GA}} pass this good article nomination. Congratulations! –Grondemar 21:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)