Talk:Atlanta Braves/GA1
{{notice|1=This GA review was seen as sub-standard by multiple editors, so while it's preserved here for the record, it is not considered a complete review; the article was put back into the queue. See WT:GAN discussion.|heading=Note:}}
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Nominator: {{User|Nemov}} 16:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
:your nomination for the article Atlanta Braves is being reviewed to become a GA article we will keep you posted via this page or my talk page best of luck to your nomonation ~best regards Paytonisboss (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Paytonisboss (talk · contribs) 13:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
= RELIABLE AND GOOD NOBILITY =
this article is a reliable and a informative article it also has major nobility Paytonisboss (talk) 13:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Note: this article is still under review
= Meets GA Criteria =
::I have reviewed this article and found that it meets the GA article criteria
::in the review I found the following things
::The articles references establish major nobility
::The article isn't in danger of having a copyright strike and dose not contain any plagiarism
::The article is well written(meaning the article is clear and easy to understand)
::The article addresses the main aspect of the article(meaning the article is written mainly about what the article is titled)
::This article is neutral with multi-pal 3rd party sources
::The article is stable(meaning it dose not have an ongoing edit war going on)
::The article has multi-pal media, and image illustrations that are relevant to the topic and they don´t contain a copyright violation Paytonisboss (talk) 15:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)