Talk:Atlanta Compromise/GA1
GA review
{{Good article tools}}
Nominator: {{User|Noleander}} 03:58, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Governor Sheng (talk · contribs) 11:48, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" |
style="vertical-align:top;"
! width="30" | Rate ! width="300"| Attribute ! | Review Comment |
style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: {{GATable/item|1a|hold|
There's a lot of double spacing; fix that as well. }} {{GATable/item|1b|y| }} |
style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}: {{GATable/item|2a|y| }} {{GATable/item|2b|y| }} {{GATable/item|2c|y| }} {{GATable/item|2d|y|Earwig's Copyvio Detector gives 73.5% similarity. This will not do. Fix this as well. A huge similarity was detected with Britannica and Teaching American History. }} |
style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: {{GATable/item|3a|hold|All major aspects are well addressed, as far as I'm aware. While reading, I never felt that something was missing or unexplained. Good work. }} {{GATable/item|3b|y|No undue weight, very well written. }} {{GATable/item|4|y| }} {{GATable/item|5|y| }} |
style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: {{GATable/item|6a|y| }} {{GATable/item|6b|y| }} {{GATable/item|7|hold|Comments need to be addressed before I can pass this. Sorry for the huge wait! }} |
{{yo| Governor Sheng}} Thanks for the detailed & thorough review. I have addressed all the issues in the right column above, and implemented the fixes as suggested.
Regarding the copyright violation tool: The results of the tool are at: https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=1&title=Atlanta_Compromise
That shows two potential violations:
- https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1291334352&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.britannica.com%2Fevent%2FAtlanta-Compromise
- https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1291334352&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Fteachingamericanhistory.org%2Fdocument%2Fthe-evolution-of-negro-leadership%2F
Examining the two reported violations, the copied text is 99% quotations from primary sources (e.g. speeches or writings of Washington or Du Bois). The duplicated text is not from secondary sources (academics or journal articles). The quotations themselves are long out of copyright, and in any case the larger quotes are rather famous quotations that are permitted under fair use doctrine.
Let me know if there are any remaining issues to be resolved to meet the GA requirements. Noleander (talk) 15:29, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
:Ok, thank you for the explanation. Should have noticed myself this. Well, since there are no remaining issues, the article is good to go. Thank you for the interesting read. Governor Sheng (talk) 07:04, 22 May 2025 (UTC)