Talk:Beckman–Quarles theorem/GA1
GA Review
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. The person who loves reading (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: The person who loves reading (talk · contribs) 16:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
{{pb}}
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- : a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: The prose is very clear, and there is no spelling or grammar mistakes.
- : b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: No known manual of style issues.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- : a. (reference section): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: This article contains many references which I can identify the source.
- : b. (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: All reliable sources.
- : c. (OR): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: No original research.
- : d. (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: No close paraphrasing.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- : a. (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: Main aspects are covered.
- : b. (focused): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: No unnecessary details.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- : Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: Very neutral.
- It is stable.
- : No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: No edit wars.
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- : a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- : b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- :: Nice image with a suitable caption.
- Overall:
- : Pass/fail: {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
(Criteria marked 14px are unassessed)
{{abot}}