Talk:Ciutat Morta/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Ciutat Morta/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Ciutat Morta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

:: Thanks for the review so far, the article is improved for it. I've answered everything with some queries, see what you think. Mujinga (talk) 11:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

:::: re "expanding #Production to meet the third criteria" I added some lines yesterday and I've added some more today from the last review I found. I've also put in the academic analysis that was previously in further reading. I don't think this film will ever have a production section the size of say Blade Runner 2049, I'm happy the main aspects are covered. Back to you, thanks! Mujinga (talk) 11:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

=Infobox and lead=

  • Improve the non-free use rationale for the poster with this template.

:* {{done}} Mujinga (talk) 10:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • "Poster" {{right arrow}} "Promotional release poster"

:* {{done}} Mujinga (talk) 10:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Don't use "
    " in the infobox. Use "plainlist" instead.

:* is this a MOS issue? Mujinga (talk) 10:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

::: Well, it says on the film infobox template that plainlist is preferred, and it also helps mobile readers.

:::: Those are good reasons, thanks. {{done}} Mujinga (talk) 11:17, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

  • In the lead, remove the comma after "until 2015".

:* I've read it a few times, I prefer it with the comma. Could rephrase if it's a big issue. Might be a British English / US English thing? Mujinga (talk) 10:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

::: The issue was that the sentence is kinda short, so a comma wasn't necessary.

=Plot=

  • This section is over 400 words, so that passes WP:FILMPLOT.
  • Remove the comma after "hit on the head".

:* agreed on that one Mujinga (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Add a comma after the first naming of Rodrigo Lanza.

:* in the brackets? I'd rather not add one there Mujinga (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

::: I see your point; it was an Oxford comma thing.

  • Remove the comma after "Alfredo Pestana".

:* that one seems good to keep since the commas are bracketing the names Mujinga (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Add a comma after "they looked".

:* i didn't add the comma but i did rephrase since the sentence was clunky Mujinga (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • "son of diplomat" {{right arrow}} "son of a diplomat"

:* {{done}} Mujinga (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

=Themes=

  • Add a comma after "gentrification".

:* don't see the need for it, we must have different comma styles Mujinga (talk) 10:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

::: Yeah, it was another Oxford comma thing.

  • Other than that, this section looks good.

=Production=

  • "seven-storey" {{right arrow}} "seven-story"

:* "storey" is BrEng Mujinga (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Add a comma after "Guàrdia Urbana".

:* again, not seeing the need for it Mujinga (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • "decide" {{right arrow}} "decided"

:* {{done}} good spot! Mujinga (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • This section is extremely short, so try expanding it.

:* I'll have a look to see if there are any more sources since November when I wrote it. Mujinga (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

::* I've added a few more lines Mujinga (talk) 11:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

::* added in the academic analysis from further reading Mujinga (talk) 11:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

=Release=

  • Add a comma after "June 8, 2013".

:* agreed! Mujinga (talk) 10:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • "action" {{right arrow}} "act"

:* yeah that makes sense Mujinga (talk) 10:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • "department" {{right arrow}} "Department"

:* rephrased tighter to source Mujinga (talk) 10:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

=Critical response=

  • The word "onesidedness" doesn't sound right, so maybe reword it?

:* went back to the source, rephrased Mujinga (talk) 10:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Add more reviews (if possible).

:* I'll have another check although this is all I could find before Mujinga (talk) 10:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

:* added two more reviews Mujinga (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

=Legacy=

  • Remove the comma after "Guàrdia Urbana".

:* i rather keep it, since it provides a space for breath. Mujinga (talk) 10:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Add a comma after "Cs, PP".

:* i rather not add one Mujinga (talk) 10:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

=Progress=

class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; width:50em"
height=50|GA review
{{small|(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)}}
#It is reasonably well written.

  1. :a (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  3. :a (references): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    c (OR): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
  4. It is broad in its coverage.
  5. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    b (focused): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
  6. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  7. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|Pass}}
  8. It is stable.
  9. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|Pass}}
  10. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  11. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|Pass}}
style="text-align:center;" |

Overall:

Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|Pass}}

height=30|15px · 15px · 15px · 15px