Talk:Coastal fortifications of New Zealand/GA1
GA Review
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
{{#if:This looks very nice, but a citation is needed for every battery in addition to the ones I've already noted.|
This looks very nice, but a citation is needed for every battery in addition to the ones I've already noted.|}}
- Is it reasonably well written?
- :A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :B. MoS compliance: {{GAList/check|n}}
- :: {{#if:web citations need publisher, date of access, date of publication (if given) and author (if given). Books need publisher and place of publication.|web citations need publisher, date of access, date of publication (if given) and author (if given). Books need publisher and place of publication.|}}
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- :A. References to sources: {{GAList/check|n}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|n}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :C. No original research: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- :A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:Complete dates of completion and decommissioning would be nice for each battery if available.|Complete dates of completion and decommissioning would be nice for each battery if available.|}}
- :B. Focused: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Is it neutral?
- :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Is it stable?
- : No edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- :A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: {{GAList/check|}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Overall:
- :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|n}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
Failed for lack of response.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:13, 3 July 2010 (UTC)