Login
Login

Talk:Cod'ine/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Cod'ine/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Cod'ine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Moneytrees (talk · contribs) 04:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Reviewed for Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/October 2020

I'll take this one and start filling it out. They were writin songs about Codine back in the 60s? I guess things don't change much. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 04:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

:Thanks for taking this on. Yes, it almost seems topical. ;) —Ojorojo (talk) 15:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y}} b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y}}

:: Well written, with some minor improvements:

:::For specificity, "{{tq|health problem}}" in the lede could be replaced with "bronchial infection".

::::Done. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

::: Opiate, Drug withdrawal, and New York City could be wikilinked.

::::Linked the first two, but NYC is well-known (:MOS:OVERLINK#locations). —Ojorojo (talk) 15:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

:::"{{tq|Later, group retrospectives sometimes include it with the title "Codine Blues", such as The Amazing Charlatans (1996).}}" I'm a bit confused by this sentence. What a group retrospective is is unclear, and "include it with the title" could be rephrased to something clearer, such as "included it under the title".

::::1) Clarified with "album"; as both a noun and adjective, "retrospective" is used for "an exhibition or compilation showing the development of the work of a particular artist over a period of time" (New Oxford American Dictionary). 2) Changed; I've seen "under the title of" used in WP articles, but thought it was more Brit Eng. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

:::I think #Release and reception could be reorganized, with the reception of the actual song first and then the reception of the album.

:::"{{tq|She managed to shake her addiction, but it had a profound effect on her: the pain she experienced was compounded by a feeling of betrayal of trust and personal violation.}}", Is rather wordy and I think could be reworded slightly.

::::Trimmed and reworded. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

:::"{{tq|In 1964, Scottish folk singer Donovan recorded a demo version of "Cod'ine". He had success with another one of Sainte-Marie's compositions, "Universal Soldier", but it was not until 1992 that his rendition of "Cod'ine" (with the title "Codine") was released on the 1992 box set, Troubadour: The Definitive Collection 1964–1976.}}" Is also rather wordy, and could be a little more clear. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 18:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

::::Trimmed and clarified; moved "Universal Soldier" to efn. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  2. :a (reference section): {{GAList/check|y}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}} d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y}}
  3. ::
  4. It is broad in its coverage.
  5. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
  6. ::
  7. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  8. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
  9. ::
  10. It is stable.
  11. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
  12. ::
  13. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
  14. :a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
  15. :: An image of Codeine or Sainte-Marie could be used but I don't really think that's necessary. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 04:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

:::::My oversight{{snd}}added a free image from Commons. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

  1. Overall:
  2. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
  3. ::

Overall a very interesting article about a great song that ended up being very predictive of modern musical trends. Just needs some minor cleanup and it'll be good to go. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 18:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

::Thanks for the fixes, I'll pass this now. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 15:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

:::Wow, that went well. Thank you for your suggestions and pass. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)