Talk:Cold fusion/Archive index

! Discussion Topic !! Replies (estimated) !! Archive Link

| cuts?

| revert

| From Steven

| Picture / diagram request

| Peer review request

| Reproducibility of the result

| Sparging

| DOE report

| Ratio?

| Suggest you solicit information from the cold fusion researchers

| Made a few changes to "Energy source vs power store"

| pseudoscience -> pathological science

| Pseudo

| Protoscience

| Cluster Impact Fusion

| Cold Fusion is...

| Has this content been included? (UCLA research)

| Two Topics To Add

| Patent rejection

| Is "Pathological" and "Pseudo" NPOV?

| Revised "Current understanding of physics" section

| Non-english links moved out of article

| Why is this nonsense about "secets" still here?

| Removed bogus definition of "pathological science"

| Changes "peer review" in intro.

| Scientific papers

| Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

| Research History

| Moved NCFI stuff back to early history

| Comments

| Comments on general policy

| totallydisputed - Problems with the FA version

| Message sent to HelpDesk

| The article is fine

| Explanation of thermonuclear fusion

| No polls?

| Wow, is this ever a blast from the past!

| The Term Cold Fusion

| Jabs at Nature

| Commerce vs Science

| Commerce vs Science, The Sequel

| Mallove

| OO's outline for rewrite

| Moved Sound waves induce nuclear fusion

| Plasma, liquid or solid: what phase is better?

| Powerpedia

| Please stop using conditional grammar incorrectly!

| Article removed from Wikipedia:Good articles

| Blaming F&P for the Press Conference

| Maybe add Jones and Rafelski to muon article

| totallydisputed tag

| Specific NPOV problems

| Mainstream Western peer-reviewed papers through the years

| please keep POV tag until the tagger is satisfied

| on the subject of NPOV

| Restructure to avoid repetitions

| NPOV, finally ?

| On the funny side

| Allegations of Suppression

| Please stop adding imaginary nonsense to this article.

| What is "commenting out" and why did you do it?

| Intro again

| assertion that authors are never allowed to peer review themselves and related claims

| Acceptable sources

| Rothwell struggles in vain to withdraw from Wikipedia

| Let's list all remaining POV issues

| Various Issues

| These two links...

| Scientific Consensus

| Possible Mod to Intro

| Deuterium Oxide = Heavy Water?

| Peer Review

| Possible Rewrite of Intro

| GA promotion

| On papers

| Nuclear Transmutation

| Length of the "Nuclear transmutation" section

| DOE 2004 Review

| Delisted from Good Article

| minor changes to summary

| is LENR a subset of CMNS ?

| Do we need sources in intro?

| Citation needed

| placement of Mizuno in Nuclear Transmutation

| about the "quotefarm" tag

| M's comments on bias

| DOE review

| Will be reverting

| Survey (request for comment)

| Disgracefaul behavior on talk:WikiProject Physics

| Positions

| Mediation request

| Ummm...

| article seems to have gotten a lot worse

| A Primer on cold fusion

| new draft of theory/mechanism section

| background

| Still disputed ?

| Recent partial reversion

| Why a separate section on mechanism ?

| 2004 DOE did not conclude on the potential as a source of energy

| Promote CR-39 image?

| Psuedoscience classification

| Disambiguation hatnote

| New Energy Times

| Disputed

| New Scientist link

| Is cold fusion a "fringe" theory

| why no mention of ion band state theory?

| Questionable statement

| Page maintainers?

| POV tag

| Proof of Helium...

| Codeposition

| Removing hoax tag

| Disputed

| Extra shielding from conduction band electrons?

| Re: "No strawman tactics on Wikipedia please"

| Confirmation of Fleischmann-Pons excess heat?

| Hawkins (the third author)

| Talk page rules

| Reference for the Mitchell Swartz theory

| 'Cold fusion' patent

| Michaelbusch: Stop deleting important books!

| Moved cold fusion to cold fusion research

| Current to-do list

| "Kook"?

| question about cold fusion

| Can there be a disambiguation page link here?

| Page now semi-protected

| Arbitration

| Checking sources

| European Physical Journal article

| POV tag

| Todd Rider thesis

| News section

| Sentence in intro

| Some beating of a dead horse

| Cold Fusion = IMPOSSIBLE

| The DoE did recommend further research

| Lack of parity and lack of controversy

| misleading edit summaries

| dispute: intro wording

| Experiments

| Condensed matter nuclear science

| Reorder

| Editing protected page

| Experimental reports

| Report summary

| Mediation (take 2)

| Shoud wikipedia present the view of "most scientists" ?

| The Faraday-efficiency effect

| NOT RENEWABLE!

| 2004 DoE panel on cold fusion article

| Why is the page protected?

| Not renewable

| Patents Filed Days after Newspaper Articles

| new lead: "other scientists failed to replicate the results."

| Pathological science

| Palladium

| lenr-canr.org

| cold fusion research laboratory page...

| Good Article review

| mediation block on top of page

| Mizuno

| Preparing for WP:FAC

| Regarding last night's changes

| Scientific community position (was References)

| To do list

| Inccuracies in Researcher's Attributions

| Extent of the effect: power ratios

| Regarding the Lead

| New proposal

| What two peer-reviewed literature reviews?

| Lack of reproducibility section biased

| Better version

| Extraneous lead sentence

| Some violations of WikiPhilosophy

| RfC: Is this topic fringe?

| Status of other disputed edits ?

| Comments removed

| Response to "Nealparr's" suggestion to remove "Further reading" links to New Energy Times

| For ScienceApologist and Nealparr

| Review Paper Clarification

| A doubt

| Each disputed point, one by one

| California

| Lists of researchers and publications

| and that most of the research groups have occasionally seen 50-200% excess heat for hours to days.

| Administrator's Noticeboard discussion over JzG's revert to 2004 version

| on wikipedia guidelines

| Please explain why presence of excess helium is not conclusive evidence of cold fusion

| Bias on both sides

| Kirk Shanahan additions

| Inclusion of Mizuno's paper

| LENR-CANR.org site useful?

| Specific edit requests

| More eyes needed again

| Sub-Section Merge

| Shanahan's non-electrochemical recombination

| Courtesy link for Hubler paper

| Why remove well-sourced statements from the "Recent development" section ?

| Does the volume yeilded from recombination of evolved output gases exclude in-cell recombination?

| Which series of experiment to cite in intro : DOE's or Hubler's

| Plans to restore a better version

| Tags

| It Doesn't Look Like Fusion

| "Cite error:"

| Proper title in front of M.R. Srinivasan ?

| New book coming out for answer to certain cf-proponents' recentist claims

| on the use of "advocates"

| Journal of Scientific Exploration

| U.S. Dept. of Energy theory vs. U.S. Navy empericism

| Summarizing Biberian's update

| Proposal for conflict reduction

| Citation style -- let's get rid of the two-level abomination

| Current quote conflicts with WP:WEIGHT

| Brooks' book

| WP:ANI

| Ranking of sources per reliability

| I take a leave

| Image Verification?

| Another try at the intro

| Reliable sources?

| Please undelete mediation pages

| Intro edit

| 2 new papers on CR-39 in European Physical Journal

| WP:AE's request for a formal warning

| New Guess

| Use of collapse boxes on talk pages

| Hypothetical

| The theory of cold fusion

| Proposed New Layout

| State of CF Research

| Keep the to-do list?

| Major changes to the article

| Reorganization

| Intro edits by ScienceApologist

| Weasel words tag

| Kowalski and Mosier-Boss et al (2008)

| New skeptical reference available

| Jed Rothwell

| Balance in the 2004 DOE report

| long sentences in the intro

| Citation Format

| A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science

| A Parting Comment on RS

| Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments

| Improving the outline

| Three Wikipedia's Pillars that don't seems respected at the voice "Cold fusion"

| Reliability of patent authorship for purposes of to-do item 1?

| archiving

| Image caption

| Who defines "improved"?

| Discussion with and about Minhducthandan's edits here

| Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article

| The probability of reaction.

| A New Reference

| Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded

| Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?

| Yoshiaki Arata's experiment

| Clarity of article, etc.

| Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded

| Example of the hysteria in 1989

| Muon-catalysed fusion

| BBC News article on ACS cold fusion session.

| Additions to "further developments"

| Variations on "pathological science"

| Die Naturwissenschaften isn't properly described as a "Life Sciences" journal.

| "one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper"

| "Lack of accepted explanation using conventional physics"

| Navy research cold fusion reports

| Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)"

| DOE reviews question: inconclusive mechanism versus [promising?] observations?

| recent RS reviiewing the topic of cold fusion

| Removal of comments from this page

| New paper out

| Some more relevant info?

| or muons

| Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist

| Revert over alleged copyvio

| Neutron radiation

| Another fine source

| Sourcing

| Lecture by Robert Duncan

| Removal of Storms material.

| The elephant in the living room: What "proposed explanations"?

| Vysotskii and biological transmutation

| I'm dropping work on the version of the article here

| Some News of work with superdense deuterium

| "excess heat observations" section

| On Improving the Article

| Sources

| Prot (again)

| Criticism of hydrino theory

| Proposal to move "non-nuclear" section to the "Discussion" section

| Notability of Storms (2007)

| Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat

| Specific article suggestions from Kirk Shanahan

| Probability of Reaction

| Proposed change to intro

| The 1989 DoE review and the 2004 review.

| Page protection

| Links available for article, mostly convenience copies.

| Mediation process

| Decision

| Something Awkward

| How to get patent story NPOV?

| Britz bibliography

| Ref Consolidation

| SPAWAR neutrons but not charged particles?

| New article

| A Uranium-Platinum Key to CF?

| Secondary sources?

| FYI: on hydrinos

| Britz' bibliography

| Removing the To-do list?

| Secondary sources? II

| Contamination as the cause of 'new' heavy metals

| Stresses

| Branching ratio

| U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency document

| New Peer-Reviewed Journal Paper Published

| Reliable Sources

| Deuteron tunnelling at electron-volt energies

| Some RS and Non-RS news

| Nature Magazine and the non-importance of failed replications

| "Loading Time" discussion

| Neutrons from glow discharge cathode deuterium fusion for transmuting nuclear waste and medical isotopes

| EEPS vs DoE

| Community ban discussion of Pcarbonn

| "Loading Time" convenience break

| "Cold Fusion" - But not LENR - Disproved

| Some news

| Some News

| New Physical Effects in Metal Deuterides

| New Book Out

| FWIW - The CCS and new paper

| Old claims and new data

| Widom-Larsen theory, heavy fermions, and heavy electron/proton interactions

| Add section on x-rays

| Measuring calibration constant shift

| Question for the Wikilawyers

| Fringe theories noticeboard post

| New Naturwissenschaften review paper

| hyphen vs en dash in subject headers

| Requests for editors of this talk page

| About X-rays

| Facepalm

| Mainstream journals

| Convenience links to papers cited in article

| X-rays

| Helium

| Should the article have a neutrality warning?

| ARL

| "Explain the difference"?

| Does Ura Ursa have sock puppets?

| Gas loading

| journal of nuclear fusion Journal of Nuclear Physics: focardi and rossi to present hydrogen-nickel fusion at low temperatures

| Conferences and Helium, heavy elements, and neutrons sections out of date.

| There is no "most vs small group"

| Proposed changes to Helium, heavy elements, and neutrons

| This Article

| Letter to editor in bibliography

| Excess Heat and Energy Production

| Publications

| Banned user

| Pathological science?

| "Unlikelihood of hot fusion"

| flaws

| NASA research deleted with WP:WEIGHT

| What most mainstream scientists believe

| Energy Catalyzer is Cold Fusion?

| LENR vs cold fusion

| Laser experiments

| chemical environment

| Proponent's theories

| mainstream respectability

| notice of general sanctions

| POV edits

| Oriani

| GroundReport

| MIT progress report

| News Flash

| e-cat not room temperature

| Describe modern meaning of "cold fusion" under "Before the Fleischmann–Pons experiment"

| non-fusion nuclear reactions

| List of LENR researchers was "List of cold fusion researchers"

| issues section

| DOE

| exceptions

| Italian source

| Nuclear technology in the wild?

| Edits to lede

| NASA

| Misleading info about reactors being 'available on the market'

| Move all pathological references to historical footnotes

| Peacock

| Suggest reverting

| Mitt Romney

| FAQ section

| Weasel words: deletion of inline tags asking for specifics

| newenergytimes

| presenting a public demonstration as scientific work

| Biberian's 2007 secondary source is also misrepresented by the article

| Add to: In popular culture - Cold Fusion

| NASA mention in intro

| McKubre talk at SRI

| Hubler quote

| Claims of working devices

| 2007 US DTRA High Energy Science & Technology Workshop assessment report

| Dispute resolution

| Current Science

| Thousands of atmospheres?

| Remove Sentence from Conferences Section

| Josephson video from Cambridge University

| LENR is in mainstream science

| Arbitration Enforcement

| several proposed revisions

| removing Cartwright

| Section: Publications

| All mention of NASA has been deleted from this article 2

| Oriani

| MIT progress report again

| Italian DOE vs American DOE

| Removed for discussion

| Binksternet

| Dubious

| initial cold fusion explanation

| plasmons

| Many conferences

| Question about journals' handling of cold fusion submissions

| McKubre photo

| Sections on "energy too large" and "small quantities of reaction products"

| Leopoldo Pirelli school

| Article section

| 1989 MIT Patents - Cold Fusion

| In Popular Culture - Cold Fusion

| POSSIBLE SLANDER

| Widom-Larsen theory

| LOVE

| Seen this?

| Cold fusion/LERN: "The existence of the effect is no longer in doubt"

| US News secondary news source on MIT, NASA, Boeing; lenrforum.eu

| Referencing Style

| Is the Widom-Larsen mechanism notable?

| Millions of Degrees?

| Bad science or Good science, Controlled experiments or Lack of, Peer review or Not, Criticism allowed?

| In Popular Culture

| Article's ABOUT header

| Romney quote

| Upcoming Conferences

| Word choice

| The Francesco Celani Replication project.

| Speaking of NASA

| context of researchers

| Use cite journal to reformat in 7 seconds not 15-27

| European Physical Journal articles on the topic

| Stresses in the Palladium

| New Sources

| International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science

| Proposed mechanisms

| unlock the article

| Misconceived reversion by DV

| Unnecessary duplication in Scientific American ref

| Huizenga's reasoning to Nernst equation missinterpretation

| Huizenga's reasoning to Nernst equation missinterpretation

| Patent

| Reliability of journals articles

| Reliability of journals articles

| Reproducibility (again)

| Reproducibility (again)

| Content suggestions that don't provide any source

| Collapsable text box - abusive use

| Collapsable text box - abusive use

| Collapsable text box - abusive use

| Collapsable text box - abusive use

| Use of archives′ content

| Use of archives′ content

| Use of archives′ content

| Neutron involvement in triggering cold fusion

| Neutron involvement in triggering cold fusion

| Rewrite proposal

| Rewrite proposal

| Rewrite proposal

| Reported helium generation - competing hypothesized mechanisms

| Reported helium generation - competing hypothesized mechanisms

| Reported helium generation - competing hypothesized mechanisms

| Excess heat as due to difference in conductivity of heavy water/water with lithium salts

| Excess heat as due to difference in conductivity of heavy water/water with lithium salts

| Excess heat as due to difference in conductivity of heavy water/water with lithium salts

| Archiving the talk page

| Quality of experiments

| Quality of experiments

| Types of models

| Connection with bubble fusion and sonoluminescense

| Biased language

| DOE ARPA-E Funding

| DOE ARPA-E Funding

| Wired

| Wired

| High temperatures are not in fact a prerequisite

| Howmany users have been banned as a result of the confusing scope?

| no accepted model

| Semi-protected edit request

| Publications

| Closure of some subsections

| Template Housekeeping

| Content handling

| Second DOE report

| Policy on Non Peer Reviewed Journal Articles

| New reference - CF is rejected by mainstream

| Adding a paragraph on Reproducibility

| Copied from User talk: Robert McClenon

| RFC

| NASA Article

| ArbCom Clarification Request, and IP Addresses

| Recent Reports on Restarting Cold Fusion Research

| Current Science Journal Has Special Section on LENR in upcoming issue

| We seem to be missing an explanation of LENR!

| Pseudo palladium tests in CMNS

| Multiple meanings?

| Tohoku University CMNS research program

| factual errors in Cold Fusion

| Oscillatory behavior and anomalous heat evolution in recombination of H2 and O2 on Pd-based catalysts

| Looks like cold fusion

| use of different name

| Publications -- Current state of research

| APS session on cold fusion.

| External links modified

| US Armed Services Committee Report

| SPAWAR Systems Center -Pacific Pd:D Co-Deposition Research: Overview of Refereed LENR Publications

| A massive proponderance of scientific evicence says the effect is real. The only objections come from the hot fusion guys, who expect to see a different reaction and by products.

| Scientific American, December 2016

| Proposed edit

| Quote

| Semi-protected edit request on 25 November 2017

| Organiclies's proposed references

| Electron+proton capture?

| Forked page?

| Problematic reference

| New Paper in Physical Review C

| boron-hydrogen fusion

| Muon-catalyzed

| Fleischmann–Pons experiment

| Rename page as LENR?

| Recent updates

| Article issues and classification

| off topic

| Wigner Energy

| Mainstream?

| Interesting read and neutrality

| Rename article to LENR (Low-energy Nuclear Reactions)