Talk:Council of Tripoli/GA1
GA review
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
Nominator: {{User|Borsoka}} 04:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 19:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
I am on it, but it might take me some time. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- The History of the Expedition to Jerusalem, a chronicle written by the German monk Albert of Aachen contains – needs comma behind "Aachen"?
- :Done.
- the head of Western (or Catholic) Church, – "the" Western (or Catholic) church
- :Done.
- Another crusader leader Godfrey of Bouillon – comma after "leader"
- :Done.
- Bohemund – Is this the same as the aforementioned Bohemond?
- :Done.
- Daimbert of Pisa arrived to the Levant – "arrived in"
- :Done.
- Their conflict was resolved at what Albert of Aachen calls "a council of magnates" – resolved when?
- :Done (?)
- Content-wise an excellent article. However, I found it quite difficult to follow, simply because of the large number of names and facts provided (e.g., some of the names introduced apparently did not play any role in the concil itself). Within all those facts, the key information, the take-aways, the big picture somehow gets lost. I am not sure if it is possible to improve on this, and how, but if you see information in the background sections that are not precisely pertinent to the council itself, it would help the reader to remove them in order to draw attention to the things that matter. Having said that, this point is optional for this GAN. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 13:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- :Thank you for you review. I try to shorten the article in accordance with your suggestions in a few days. Borsoka (talk) 00:53, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- ::Thanks. Since this last point is optional, and I am not entirely sure myself if this has to be fixed or what the best solution would be, I am promoting now. Congrats! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
{{abot}}