Talk:Danny Deever/GA1

{{al|{{#titleparts:Danny Deever/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Danny Deever/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starting GA reassessment. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment

1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
2. ::* {{GAList/check|y}}
3. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
4. ::* {{GAList/check|y}}
5. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
6. ::* {{GAList/check|y}} Some page needed tags but not all are needed. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
7. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
8. ::* {{GAList/check|y}}
9. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
10. ::* {{GAList/check|y}}

No probs with quick fail criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|y}}
3. ::*
4. :b (MoS): {{GAList/check|y}}
5. ::*
6. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
7. :a (references): {{GAList/check|y}}
8. ::*Some references to print material have page needed tags. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
9. :b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}}
10. ::*
11. :c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}}
12. ::*
13. It is broad in its scope.
14. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}}
15. ::*
16. :b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
17. ::*
18. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
19. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
20. ::*
21. It is stable.
22. :No edit wars etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
23. ::*
24. ::
25. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
26. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}}
27. ::*
28. :b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
29. ::*
30. ::
31. Overall:
32. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
33. ::*This is an excellent article, but there is one small problem. Page numbers are needed for reference #3, #4 and #5. Tag have been left by another editor. I managed to find an online source for reference #6. I am placing the reassessemnt on hold, whilst this is addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
34. :::*All now directly reffed. I've removed one of the cites, as it seemed to just duplicate material found in another one, and I couldn't find a print copy to confirm. Anything else looks like it needs brought up to spec? Shimgray | talk | 16:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
35. ::::*All OK, now. I am happy to keep at GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
36. ::