Talk:David Beckham/GA2
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 10:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
This nomination is very troubling to me. There are somewhere between 2 dozen and 30 entire paragraphs without a single WP:IC, which for me is always enough for a quickfail. It violates WP:MOS on a couple of fronts including that the WP:LEAD is five paragraphs whereas four is the maximum number recommended. At over 75KB readable prose, the article's WP:SIZE suggests it should be considered for some WP:SPLIT. The article seems to need some reorganization with very long sections with many paragraphs that give it a tedious feel. This seems to be a bit of a drive-by nomination since the nominator has not edited the page in 2013 and the nominator has [https://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=David_Beckham fewer than 10 edits to the page's entire history]. Due to its size and need for organization and the questionable familiarity with the article (not the topic) of the nominator, I am quickfailing this article. Please review WP:WIAGA before renominating this article. The reason that this is so troubling is that this nominator has among the highest number of nominations at WP:GAC of all nominators.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 10:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)