Talk:Debate on the monarchy in Canada#rfc 37592AF

• General feeling I found from this article is a lack of objectivity.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:4|one external link|4 external links}} on Debate on the monarchy in Canada. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=687774909 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090708012006/http://www.monarchist.ca/cmn/2001/opinion.htm to http://www.monarchist.ca/cmn/2001/opinion.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111206105106/http://www.thestrategiccounsel.com/our_news/polls/0905%20GMCTV%20September%2026%20GG.pdf to http://www.thestrategiccounsel.com/our_news/polls/0905%20GMCTV%20September%2026%20GG.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080829172459/http://www.angus-reid.com/uppdf/ARS_Monarchy.pdf to http://www.angus-reid.com/uppdf/ARS_Monarchy.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120304032127/http://www.visioncritical.com/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/2008.03.12_Monarchy.pdf to http://www.visioncritical.com/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/2008.03.12_Monarchy.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

At present the article shows a photo of John Manley, who is probably here as a representative anti-monarchist. There is nothing about John Manley in the text of the article, to explain why a picture is included. Searching for his name in other articles, I found this mention in Republicanism in Canada: {{green|..on Victoria Day 2001, Manley said on CBC Radio that he believed that hereditary succession was outdated, and that the country's head of state should be elected.{{cite news| title=Canada no longer needs Queen: Manley| publisher=CBC| date=18 May 2001| url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2001/05/18/monarchy_010517.html| accessdate=18 February 2009}}}} I suggest that a mention of Manley's views should be added to the present article, using this as a reference. EdJohnston (talk) 01:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:8|one external link|8 external links}} on Debate on the monarchy in Canada. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=753881145 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120217112938/http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/may99/smith.pdf to http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/may99/smith.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120217112947/http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/may99/valpy.pdf to http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/may99/valpy.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923060531/http://odesi1.scholarsportal.info/webview/index/en/Odesi/ODESI-Click-to-View-Categories-.d.6/Public-Opinion-Polls.d.28/CANADA.d.29/Ipsos-Reid.d.717/1990s.d.718/1993.d.722/National-Angus-Reid-Poll-January-1993-Canada-.s.ir-1-555-40-E-1993-01/Royal-Family.h.13F1/Regarding-the-Monarchy-in-Canada-/fVariable/ir-1-555-40-E-1993-01_V11 to http://odesi1.scholarsportal.info/webview/index/en/Odesi/ODESI-Click-to-View-Categories-.d.6/Public-Opinion-Polls.d.28/CANADA.d.29/Ipsos-Reid.d.717/1990s.d.718/1993.d.722/National-Angus-Reid-Poll-January-1993-Canada-.s.ir-1-555-40-E-1993-01/Royal-Family.h.13F1/Regarding-the-Monarchy-in-Canada-/fVariable/ir-1-555-40-E-1993-01_V11
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923061015/http://odesi2.scholarsportal.info/documentation/Gallup/sep1999.pdf to http://odesi2.scholarsportal.info/documentation/Gallup/sep1999.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923060907/http://odesi2.scholarsportal.info/webview/index.jsp?study=http%3A%2F%2F142.150.190.128%3A80%2Fobj%2FfStudy%2Fcipo-E-1999-09&node=0&mode=download&v=2&analysismode=table&top=yes&language=en to http://odesi2.scholarsportal.info/webview/index.jsp?study=http%3A%2F%2F142.150.190.128%3A80%2Fobj%2FfStudy%2Fcipo-E-1999-09&node=0&mode=download&v=2&analysismode=table&top=yes&language=en
• Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=462c1fbb-fae6-43e9-9d82-5dc77dfdb07d&p=1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124221027/http://ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=4819 to http://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=4819
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5o4XQi18u?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww2.parl.gc.ca%2FSites%2FLOP%2FInfoparl%2F27%2F2%2F27n2_04e_trepanier.pdf to http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Sites/LOP/Infoparl/27/2/27n2_04e_trepanier.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003102014/http://www.ops.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=4c4f7726-bc9c-497c-ac85-158c1b8c8d9d to http://www.ops.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=4c4f7726-bc9c-497c-ac85-158c1b8c8d9d

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Debate on the monarchy in Canada. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=799410845 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150521124231/http://www.monarchist.ca/sites/default/files/documents/2003/11/177.pdf to http://www.monarchist.ca/sites/default/files/documents/2003/11/177.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120427000732/http://www.monarchist.ca/en/node/136 to http://www.monarchist.ca/en/node/136
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Sites/LOP/Infoparl/27/2/27n2_04e_trepanier.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

I'd argue with Finch's theory. The lack of engagement, interest, awareness of the Canadian monarchy, is that institution's strength & not its potential downfall. Not to mention the high bar the Supreme Court has put in place, to abolish the monarchy. Now, if only we had some sources, to counter Finch's theory. GoodDay (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

This section is based on wp:synth. None of the sources talk about referring to the monarchy as 'British' relative to the debate sounding it. I don't understand why this important or anything other than irrelevant minutia—blindlynx 22:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

The majority of the 'the debate' section of this article is a collection of random quotes and newspaper articles as direct evidence from claims. There precious little in terms of actual reliable sources—blindlynx 23:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

This article seems to have a strong bias towards Republican Opinion with quotes from different sources being added in to conflate polling results

I believe the page needs to be re wrote in whole in a more neutral and factual point of view. Knowledgework69 (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

:what sections are you referring to? —blindlynx 20:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

:{{small|The question of whether a royal who is not a "working royal" is entitled to state-funded security is one that has been answered "No" by both Canada ([https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51636835 Feb 2020]) and the UK ([https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/prince-harry-loses-appeal-for-uk-government-funded-security-detail May 2025]). I would imagine that the most fervently pro-monarchist people would support such funding for all royals, even non-working, but might draw the line at funding royals who had disgraced or been exiled from the family. But that's all background to the following question that I want to raise that is relevant to this Wikipedia article:}}

In the 2019-2020 period during which it seemed likely that Harry and Meghan would be spending a lot of time in Canada, did monarchists and non-monarchists in Canada comment differently on this? Did comment interact with the general debate on monarchy in Canada? Was Harry regarded as in some sense Canadian, as just another foreign celebrity, ...? jnestorius^(talk) 12:12, 12 May 2025 (UTC)